Desired Date Of Occupancy: Fill & Download for Free

Ah, you’ve been listening to the oppositional Mr. Norman Finkelstein, who likes to go around referring to Elie Wiesel as a “Holocaust Wh*re” for (Mr. Weisel, who is now deceased) daring to write about his (Mr. Wiesel’s) own experiences in the Nazi Death Camps—and then compounding that great moral lapse for daring to be vocal in his support of Israel.The fact that Mr. Wiesel’s support of Israel had something to do with his fervent desire to never see such an inhumane disaster ever happen again is a real bummer to Anti-Jewish wannabe Pseudo-socialist Demi-Gods like Norman Finkelstein and his mentor, Noam Chomsky. The fact that Mr. Finkelstein rhetorically exploits his own mother’s escape from the Nazis as a DEFENSE for calling Mr. Wiesel “a Holocaust Wh*re” in public EVERY SINGLE TIME HE DOES IT does not seem to compute in the minds of “Anti-Zionists” who find it very convenient when “useful idiot” Jews in Name Only do their dirty work for them.The hypocrisy completely escapes them. There is no historical date of “Palestine” because the Palestinians refuse to negotiate in good faith for their legitimate statehood and have refused every single two-state offer that has ever come their way.Elie Wiesel, unlike the Palestinians, did not let the inhuman treatment he endured make him a bitter person obsessed with vengeance and a need to punish scapegoats for his losses and the misery he suffered because of them. He fought for peace and justice and part of that fight was to support the existence of the one sole majority Jewish nation in existence on the entire planet.Elie Wiesel, more than anyone, personally knew the cost of Jews bending their heads to chopping block ever again. It is something that others might have the luxury of overlooking in their current circumstances but Israelis can’t and neither can other Jews worldwide, whether they see it at the present moment or not. More and more Jews ARE seeing growing evidence of it everyday. And it isn’t because Israel exists—it is the reason WHY Israel must continue to exist. The hypocrites are the Pseudo-Social Justice Warriors who argue against that fact.

The limiting factor was when Japan surrendered, not the atomic bombings. Put it another way: if Japan had not surrendered after the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the Red Army could have invaded one of the Japanese Home Islands, most likely Hokkaido.Sometime shortly before or after Japan's surrender on August 15, Stalin ordered Aleksandr Vasilevsky, commander of Soviet Forces in the Far East, to begin planning for the invasion of Hokkaido and occupation of the Kuriles to be completed by September 1. By August 18, Stalin was insisting on a start date of August 21 for the invasion, but he also equivocated on whether the goal was the invasion of Hokkaido and the Kuriles or the invasion of Hokkaido or the Kuriles.Red Army commanders complied with Stalin's orders and formulated plans for an invasion of Hokkaido by two or three infantry divisions[1] but they would have to be landed in three phases due to the lack of ships. A start date of August 23 was set.At the same time Truman and Stalin were exchanging testy communiques, with Stalin demanding amendments to the agreements reached at Potsdam surrounding concessions in the Far East.By August 22 Stalin had changed his mind and the invasion of Hokkaido was put off, but the occupation of all the Kuriles would continue, the occupation having been started on August 18. The occupation of all the Kuriles, not just the northern Kuril islands as was agreed at Potsdam was completed by September 1.The occupation of the Kuriles by the Red Army was two bit operation by Pacific War standards: one reinforced infantry division, about sixty ships and assorted bombers and fighters.Remember, Japan had announced its surrender on August 15, and the surrender agreement was signed on September 2. Soviet moves on Japanese territories have the appearance of grabbing everything they could before the war was officially over.Since all this went down after Japan announced its surrender, absent a Japanese surrender, the invasion of Hokkaido would seem to be a certainty. However, I am not certain that Stalin would undertaken it.Truman had already denied Stalin an occupation zone in Japan at Potsdam. Stalin might have reasoned that possession is nine tenths of the law and Hokkaido might have gained him a de facto or de jure occupation zone in Japan, in spite of Truman.However, possession of Hokkaido didn't confer much strategic advantage; regaining Sakhalin was more strategically desirable (the US had conceded this at Potsdam) and possession of all the Kuriles meant the USSR had an outlet into the Pacific (the US thought it had conceded half Kuriles at Potsdam but did not protest overmuch when Stalin took them all).I think that Stalin might have settled for Kuriles and not attempted an invasion of Hokkaido. The cost in blood and treasure was never an issue for Stalin, however, he knew that taking Hokkaido would have been a serious breach of what he had agreed to at Potsdam and would prompted serious pushback by Truman, not just in the Far East, but in Europe. Stalin's grip on Eastern Europe was tenuous and Hokkaido was just wasn't worth it.[1] Soviet divisions was smaller on paper and in practice than US divisions. Two Red Army infantry divisions might have equated to one reinforced Marine division.

This seems to be a smart move by the Government of India to collect the necessary data by NPR, which can then be used for NRC. It was stated clearly on record in Rajya Sabha by NDA government that NPR is the base document from where NRC work will start,” The then Union minister Kiren Rijiju in RS on November 26, 2014 said NPR was a register of all “usual residents” of India. The written response also said NPR was “the first step towards creation of an NRIC by verifying citizenship status of every usual citizen”.[1]Let us understand how NPR may be a precursor of NRC.The following demographic details of every individual are required for every usual resident under NPR:Name of personRelationship to head of householdFather’s nameMother’s nameSpouse’s name (if married)SexDate of BirthMarital statusPlace of birthNationality (as declared)Present address of usual residenceDuration of stay at present addressPermanent residential addressOccupation/ActivityEducational qualification[2]It is true that these information was also collected in 2011. However, it was then not linked with Aadhar. It is clearly evident from the following media report,Union Cabinet of India on 24th December 2019 announced that it has allocated around Rs 3,500 crores for updating National Population Register (NPR). The process shall commence from April next year and will be completed by September. NPR was first done in 2010 and was later updated in 2015 when it was linked with the Aadhar.[3]Most of the Indians did not have Aadhar in 2015 and hence, this exercise was incomplete.In the current NPR, the linking of Aadhar with NPR shall be completed as evident from the following gist of the NPR proposed by Government as published in The Times of India today[4].Once Government is able to capture the Aadhar of your parents and then their parents (which they have to provide in their NPR details), the computer shall automatically make a family tree and identify where the link is broken.In this way, they can easily identify, if you or your parents are citizen of India or not based on any deadline Government may select.It is true that giving the details of Aadhar, passport and driving license would be voluntary. However, if you don’t provide these details, you become a suspect and then necessary inquiry can be started against you.In this smart way, Government can identify the suspected people who may not qualify to be the citizen of India. Thereafter, the rest of the people (unsuspected) can be declared as citizen of India by publishing the Provisional NRC containing their names and Aadhar number. Rest of the citizens may be asked to submit the desired documents to prove their citizenship, if there name is missing in the Provisional NRC before the Final NRC is released.Hence, it appears that NPR is the precursor of the NRC as already declared by the Government in Parliament and repeated several times by Mr Amit Shah in public gathering.No one from the Government, including the Prime Minister has ever said to best of my knowledge that there shall be no NRC in India. They have only said that NRC is not being discussed at this stage. However, NRC proceedings may soon start after NPR proceedings are completed in 2021.Those who oppose NRC may also oppose the NPR as proposed by the Government because NPR may not be a problem in itself, but when it is linked with NRC and CAA, it can create huge problem for certain communities in India.This fear can be allayed only if CAA is either repealed or made religion-neutral according to the principles of secularism enshrined in Indian Constitution.Footnotes[1] We started NPR but BJP tied it to NRC: Congress | India News - Times of India[2] Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India[3] What is NPR: All you need to know about National Population Register[4] Government approves update of national population register, says no link to NRC | India News - Times of India