In Re The Domestic Partnership Of: Fill & Download for Free

Indulging in core competency is not a crime.People have different opinions about the performance of Modi as a Prime Minister. Some say, he is the best PM India ever. Others says, he is the worst PM. But I am certain all of them will agree that he is the best election campaigner ever. He knows how to put on a show. I still remember the trick he pulled when he entered the Indian Parliament for the first time after being chosen as PM.Anyway, this time he chose to endorse President Trump for upcoming elections in the US. This is not a smart thing to do. One must not take sides in the domestic political affairs of other countries. It could have been easily avoided. However, PM Modi in his usual style asked (indirectly) the Indian community in the US to vote for Trump."Abki bar, Trump sarkar". Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Sunday made a tacit backing for US President Donald Trump who is seeking re-election, and said his presence on the stage with him signaled the close partnership between the two nations.[1]I think this was premeditated. Ordinarily, the US Presidents avoid such gatherings. But, elections being not far way, President Trump needs every vote he can gather. A four-million-strong Indian community improves his prospects in the quarters traditionally held by democrats. The last time 80% of the Indian community in Houston voted for democrats. I am sure PM Modi will nudge them to vote for Trump. No wonder, Trump walked hand in hand with Modi during the event.Potential downside of endorsement.Having said that, endorsing the Presidential / PM candidates from other countries isn't unprecedented. American Presidents have endorsed their favorite candidates in other countries. Not to mention, Russian President Vladimir Putin, who gave a qualified endorsement of Donald Trump's candidacy back in 2015.Sure, it would have been prudent to stick to Indo-American relations. But I think we need not be bothered by such events. There is hardly any downside to this. If democrats win, they are smart enough to ignore personal proclivity of PM Modi.Conclusion: There are far important issues like “Climate Change” and “Human rights abuse in Kashmir” that need people’s undivided attention.Images: Google/ Washington PostFootnotes[1] ‘Ab ki baar, Trump sarkar’: Did Narendra Modi really endorse the US President for re-election?

Here’s the relevant Washington law re the prior wife:Dissolution, invalidation, or termination of marriage or domestic partnership.Assuming the old Will has not been revoked and the exception stated in the above statute (“unless …”) is ineffective, Decedent dies testate (with the old Will), prior wife is considered to have predeceased (getting nothing), and widow takes her intestate share as an “omitted spouse”:Omitted spouse or omitted domestic partner.Richard Wills, retired probate attorney originally licensed in CA & WA

5 reasons why PM Modi pulled out of RCEP in BangkokAs the second China International Import Expo is being held in Shanghai from November 5–10, India Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced India stayed out of the 16-member Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) pact. This announcement sounds weird as opening up is the irreversible tide for any country and close-door policy would cause sever consequences which had already been proven by China’s Qing Dynasty (1644–1911).The 16 members of RCEP negotiations were 10 ASEAN members plus Australia, China, India, Japan, New Zealand and South Korea. Without India, RCEP does not look as attractive trade pact as it promised to be during negotiation stage.India was questioned, persuaded and even encouraged after the announcement was made.Is it simply because India is afraid of competition and is afraid of opening up its market to the world? Don’t Modi and his team know close-door will be lagged behind? Of course, they know. Therefore, there must have other reasons.I am merciful and kind. I think criticizing somebody, or some nation, without figuring out the fact, is not good. We are not Indians and we do not know whether or not the RCEP pact fits the country now. But I believe, Modi, as a national leader, together with his team, must have made meticulous assessments and they must have taken all possibilities into consideration before they made the decision. They must have assessed how the pact would benefit the country and whether it would hurt the nation’s interests, economic development and manufacturing industry. If a free trade agreement is not favourable for a country, no matter how popular it is to other countries, it would be refused. It is not a hasty decision, but a carefully-made one.On November 4, “Neither the Talisman of Gandhiji nor my own conscience permits me to join RCEP,” said Prime Minister Narendra Modi in Bangkok. Let’s look at what happens in India now. The article “5 reasons why PM Modi pulled out of RCEP in Bangkok” posted on the website India Today explains why. It is an insightful article from the perspective of Indians, neither Chinese, nor Japanese.Difficult economic timeIndia is undergoing a difficult economic time. It reports:“The rate of GDP growth has been slowing down for five consecutive quarters, that is, since January-March 2018. The GDP growth figures have been a topsy-turvy curve since the roll out of goods and services tax.”When a government is struggling to deal with the domestic economic situation, a massive free trade pact like RCEP would have exposed the businesses and agriculture to unequal competition.Trade deficit“Of the 15 RCEP countries, India has serious trade deficits with at least 11. India’s trade deficit with these countries has almost doubled in the last five-six years - from US$54 billion in 2013–14 to US$105 billion in 2018–19.”In such situation, a free trade agreement with the grouping would have increased the trade deficit and widening trade deficit would empty foreign exchange reserve of India at a faster rate.Demands of farmers and industriesDifferent from China and ASEAN countries which have robust service and manufacturing sectors, these two are not doing well in India. RCEP pact is not popular to farmers.“In agriculture, domestic players dealing in dairy products, spices -- chiefly pepper and cardamom, rubber, and coconut would face dumping from the South Asian spice majors. Vietnam and Indonesia have very cheap rubber to export. Australia and New Zealand are waiting for a free access to India for their dairy products. Indian businesses would be hit hard as RCEP does not offer enough protection to them.”They are enough to explain Modi and the nation’s decision.