Sample Letter Of Guarantee: Fill & Download for Free

It seems this is still going and Dr Fearon is getting litigious:Sender: Dr William F FearonLocation, Beaufort Street, Chelsea, London, EnglandDear Colleague,Just to let you know I have sent you an update on the ongoing legal dispute betwen myself and Microsoft Plc and Google LLC which has been going on for over sixteen weeks. It centers on the blocking of my Microsoft Plc (MSN/Hotmail) and Googe LLC (Gmail)email accounts in May 2018 by their executuve boards and their efusal to restore my email account access. By all means if you are a juristician, a notary, juriste d’entreprise or indeed a non-legal practitioner but a potential complainant in a matter concerning the right to access your own data or related issues feel free to use whatever arguments I have raised, in my submission to the Sacremento Superior Court in California, USA for your own legal challenges. Unfortunately, when I tried to translate the text into French it produced a very inelegant version, so I have left it in the original English format.I can assure you that it is not the most perfect example of a petition to an American court and I acknowledge that there will be errors that are immediately apparent to more experienced litigants and attorneys. I am also not totally familiar with the institutions of the European Union either. There are some English terms, mainly compound nouns, and phraseology that I have used which may be new to you but are used every day in medicine or computer science and in the trades in the United Kingdom, North America and latterly Australia. If certain words or phrases are unfamliar to you, you may have to be a little creative/imaginative to try to determine what it is, that is being explained, but overall it should be straightforward. Then you could, if you wish send it to the Chinese news agencies Xinhua, and China News, their staff usually read my emails for information, theories and then filter it through into the Chinese press in London and Shanghai. As for Microsoft and Google they are going to have to gitch: Get In That Court House.RegardsDr William F FearonBeaufort StreetLondon SW3 5BJ24/05/2018Sacremento Superior Court720 9th Street, Sacremento,CA95814, USADear Sir/MadamRe: UK Breach of Contract Law/US Telecommunications Law/European Union GDPRNotice is hereby given, of the initiation on the grounds civil, of a lawsuit, against a corporation registered in the United States of America. In relation to such proceedings, it is to be recorded by Clerk to the Justices’ of the Sacremento Superior Court in the State of California, that I the prospective plaintiff Dr William F Fearon of the above postal address will seek legal redress in the aforesaid court against the following companies (1):Microsoft Plc and (2):Google LLC.As regards the particulars of my complaint I can initially state that I am a home based internet and broad band connected personal computer user. My PC runs in conjunction with a Microsoft Windows 10 operating system, and I have held it for over two years. I access the internet using either Google Chrome or Internet Explorer and I have three Google LLC (Gmail) email accounts, and seven Microsoft Plc, MSN/Hotmail email accounts the latter maintained by Microsoft Plc’s European computer services division, Microsoft Ltd. All the email accounts are co-registered in the United States and I have held them for between 4 and 15 years. Since the evening of Tuesday the 1st of May 2018, I have been unable to access both the internet and my email accounts from my home address. I was disconnected without warning or explanation. In response, I followed the Windows Network Diagnostics message and procedural guidelines that appeared onscreen in order to identify the problem and attempted to reconnect to the internet. When I followed the instructions, an error message appeared stating that:” ‘Ethernet’ does not have a valid IP configuration” which I assumed to mean, that my Internet Service Provider EE (UK company registration number: 02382161) had disconnected my internet account from the Public Switch Telephone Network (PSTN). My Internet Protocol address is now invalid and a further diagnostic message confirmed that I had no internet connection.I contacted EE by telephone on the same day, as the disconnection, and a member of staff I spoke to was able to manage a structured walkthrough of reconnection instructions whilst talking to me, to determine what the cause of the problem might be. However, the operative seemed unable or unwilling to allow my reconnection. Instead it was suggested that as my PC runs on the Microsoft Windows 10, operating system, I should contact the technical team at Microsoft head office on Buckingham Palace Road, London, SW1 9TQ, as they might be responsible, for the disconnection. I duly contacted Microsoft and I shall return to the response I received later in my submission.Both email account service providers Google LLC (Gmail) and Microsoft Plc (MSN/Hotmail) supposedly run their utilities on separate USbased operating systems managed from different corporate sites. As the email password interruptions occurred concurrently, it would suggest however, that a jointly agreed computer override mechanism is in place either in the US, the UK or elsewhere. Instantiating the disconnection process would have been a very straightforward procedure. A human or an automated signal, was sent out beginning an electronic process which bypassed, the different layers of security and mainframe computer defenses of each internet service provider. The signal broke through the intrusion detection systems, anti-virus, anti-hacking hardware and application firewall protection software that I have installed on my personal computer. It then crossed the Secure Sockets Layer/Transport Layer Security internet linked machine to machine encryption defenses, which secure the communication lines between my web browser and the multiple web servers I contact when trawling the internet. It interrupted transmission between all other external devices operating over the internet and blocked all intranet connections to my internal household electrical network. Access to each email service provider’s operating system was then gained and my individual passwords for each respective email address were deleted.Obviously, the loss of both my internet connection and my email access is a major inconvenience. I use my email accounts for business transactions with Account Information Service Providers; and for domestic and company financial record keeping including receiving updates from Payment Information Service Providers and for the dissemination of, prognostic and diagnostic medical information in reply to enquiries. My medical and academic opinions, are usually conveyed to hospital staff, consultants, university students, medical staff, and NGO healthcare workers in England, Washington DC, Chicago, California, Melbourne, Brussels, Italia, India, France, Kenya and finally China. Predictably without such telecommunications capabilities, I am unable to liaise with my work place when I work from home, nor can I retrieve email messages outside of office hours. As a result, I have lost opportunities to engage in further professional, commercial and charitable activity missed invitations to attend, networking and social events, curtailing my future earnings potential. I now have limited email and website contact with colleagues and institutions, and restricted access to information databases and membership services as my various online registration details and entitlements, and my employment and identity data are harder to verify on input from an unregistered or new email address and a new ISP location.My email accounts, some of which I use on a regular basis, and some intermittently, also contain;(a): medical records relating to General Practice visits and Hospital examinations;(b): my employment history dating back several decades;(c): records of my employers;(d): data on clients, agreed to be shared by the said clients, myself, partners and other networked mutual colleagues;(e): confirmation of membership records detailing my affiliations with professional American and Italian medical societies, and other organisations worldwide of which I am a member, secretary or a director;(f): my bank account and credit card details and related transactions and;(g): invitations to attend discussions at medical, economic, philosophical and scientific symposia, in US, the UK, the European Union, China, Singapore and other countries in South East Asia as a member of the audience, panel constituent, or as a lead podium speaker.Many of the email records and the content within are in effect public property, as they are of confirmed local and international historical interest, to members of heritage societies, libraries, museums and medical associations, in the Europe Union, Australia and North America. In the United Kingdom, the heritage status of tangible and intangible properties is detailed by the Treasury Department of the government. All my email records are to be reviewed by a solicitor after which they will be archived. Each relevant blocked email account is below undermentioned:[email protected]@[email protected]@[email protected]@[email protected]@[email protected]@hotmail.comIn order to verify the status of my Internet Service Provider registration, I searched an online database at another location and found that no ISP geolocation data for my address or name appeared. Neither did any information on my name, ISP and Internet Protocol (IP) appear, when I searched the: American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN) nor did any information appear on any European geolocation database registry. My home IP address is, however indirectly registered and the details obtainable from the United States Department of Commerce, as the IP address is logged, with their subcontracted service providers the: Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers(ICANN) based in California. To avoid IP address conflicts, the ICANN reserves certain IP address blocks in the US for both private and public use. When an organization such as EE requires a block of IP addresses, each IP address is assigned to a US Internet Service Provider. An identical process of submission and allocation, of ISP and IP address data, is used by database registration compilers in the European Union.After failing to regain access to my email accounts by using my normal username and password combinations, I attempted to access them three different times, from three other separate locations using three alternative personal computers all of which used the Windows operating system. Email password entry was blocked on each occasion. As is known to regular email users when such occurrences take place, a new password is required to reenter each email account. An online onscreen prompt will ask the email account holder to provide security information to verify their identity in order to reset their password. As I had done at my home address, I entered my name; the approximate date the email account contract was confirmed, and the account opened; my date of birth; sample email subject headings which I had used; and the email addresses of various recipients to which I had sent correspondence. Then I correctly answered a standard security question, the answer to which was known only to myself. My preaccount opening, emergency contact email address, was also entered, however, it had been rendered inaccessible by the invalidation of all my passwords. I therefore had to create a totally new email address in order to receive new password security codes for my Microsoft MSN/Hotmail and Google Gmail accounts which I did. I then received a new password retrieval code which allowed me to go through the security process once more. Yet even after recompleting the security procedure, and entering the required data from my new email address I was informed by the onscreen prompt that I had supplied insufficient information and as a result my email access was denied. As regards Microsoft and their data retrieval methods, it is the case, that once an email account data retrieval query is entered into the email password reaccess webpage by an email account holder via the computer keyboard a Microsoft supercomputer will retrieve the confirmatory data from their database of registered email accounts in a matter of nanoseconds. Their supercomputer email and social media data retrieval software is built for precisely such predictable eventualities. Retrieved details will appear in realtime on a Microsoft technical team monitor. They can also be voiced in panoramic soundscape at the same time. Envisage. If the password reconfirmation request is made over the telephone to a member of the email or social media sites technical team or even inputted orally via a close field computer microphone (the latter is also feasible) it will also be processed in a very standard format. Once the usual security verification questions are answered granting renewed email access to the email account holder is a formality.To gain, an explanation for the email account closures, I firstly wrote to Google LLC (Gmail) at their regional head office in the UK and at their global headquarters in Palo Alto, California, USA on the 2nd of May 2018; and sent a letter of complaint to Microsoft Ltd (MSN/Hotmail) at their headquarters in London, England on the on the 3rd of May 2018. Both corporations were asked to respond within fourteen days giving their explanations as to why my account passwords had been blocked, and to restore my email account access both declined to respond within the specified period. On the 18thof May, however, I did receive a written response from Google UK Limited, the UK subsidiary of Google LLC, from their UK headquarters in, London, (no telephone number was given) detailing their legal position in email related litigational disputes, namely, that it is their United States parent company Google LLC and not they, that are to be held liable in legal cases concerning Gmail accounts. Alphabet Inc. is the US holding company of Google LLC (Gmail) however, I can find no trace of their, United States company registration number on any online website. On the 19th of May 2018, I received a further written reply from the UK headquarters of Microsoft Limited at the Microsoft Campus at Thames Valley Park, England (listing an obsolete telephone number and their UK company registration number: 01624297) in which a Microsoft staff member implausibly, claimed not to be able to locate the email account(s) I had cited with the information I had submitted. It is not the case, as the email username details I supplied were adequate for a very standard email database records trace. To put matters into a very relatable perspective, for the court’s benefit, my local library in London can do a full trace of every library member account with a ‘Fearon’ surname with the initial ‘W’ timed from the moment of data entry to their appearance on screen in a hand timed approximately 2-3 seconds. My company database controller can carry out the process of checking on our clients at an even quicker pace.As we are concerned with data verification and recovery issues, it is important to remember that comparable organizations with similar supercomputer facilities to those used by Microsoft and Google do exist in the American public sector. Their computer security staff are equally adept at data retrieval and unscrambling and decrypting deliberately hidden information. For example, it is well known, and often and openly reported in the American press that both the FBI and the CIA computer examination forensic squads can recover information data from a rain or fire damaged portable phone and download the stored data on its SIM card. They can also regain seemingly permanently lost data from a formatted, deleted and damaged personal computer hard drive disc, and SCSI or USB memory sticks even after the details have supposedly been wiped. Then after security checks have been carried out they can return the recovered data in a digitized format to the correct owners. Then if circumstances dictate they can provisionally retain the reusable data, pending further enquiries; or keep the data as a forfeit if data transmission regulations or civil or criminal laws are alleged to have been infringed. In relation to data recovery from a mainframe server, the same success rate percentage in data retrieval accuracy is expected of their computer forensic teams. This would also apply when their forensic detectives are examining a mainframe supercomputer that has been exposed to a computer virus infection, or suffered an unexpected and unexplained system crash or hardware or software failure. Both the FBI and the CIA are obviously proud of their abilities in the field of computer data rescue and repair and don’t feel the need to hide their capabilities from the American public. Most likely the fallback method used to affect such accurate high percentage rate data retrieval by American policing and security agencies is, that it is achieved by searching Internet Service Provider data storage records held in a CLOUD data store. In the United Kingdom, our four main Security Service agencies use similar methods and retain full or partial records of every used, email account in Europe that has interacted with a UK internet or email address or those located in a UK overseas territory and can gain virtually unobstructed access to every UK email, corporate website or personal social media account.Given the preceding anecdotal evidence, and its reasonableness, when the comparable memory, speed and processing power of a high performance mainframe cluster of supercomputers as used by Microsoft Plc and its social media divisions, MSN, Hotmail, LinkedIn, etc.; are taken into account, and then compared with the supercomputer facilities used by both the CIA and FBI, each respective organizations mainframe computers would be matchable in terms of terahertz chip speed and random data retrieval access. Thus it can be sensibly assumed, and the sedentary conclusion drawn, that the written comments made by Microsoft staff, suggesting that they are unable to find my email records are little more than a pretext used by the technical and legal staff of each corporation, to prevent me from accessing my email accounts. I am not often prone to enumerating new additions to jurisprudential legal theory, although I have done so in the past; nor am I predisposed to making prescriptive comments or recommendations on future statutory inclusions in the legal canon itself. However, in this case, in the process of the creation of new law, I am willing to assert in relation to the former: that each of the email addresses I have registered in the United States has: (a) attached obvious intellectual property rights; in respect of additions to the latter:(b) it shall be the case that: legitimate retention of an email address conveys implied, and enforceable legal entitlements to the copyright protection of the username registered; and:(c) by extension, the law of copyright will be extended to cover the data contained within the email account irrespective of the format in which it is transmitted or recieved. In nondebatable terms, therefore, I interpret the remit of US statute law, corporation regulations and future judicial court decisions on data protection, as extending to the owners of US registered email accounts the same protected status and right of copyright and proprietal ownership that is given to the person or persons registering a unique internet website domain name, and its purpose or purposes. The aforementioned legal criteria should be applied and adhered to, by all email service providers; regardless of where the email or social media or account owner resides. Overseas residence temporary or permanent is not meant to be a legal loophole for US Information Technology companies who provide internet based services to use to justify their evasion of United States consumer protection laws or copyright legislation that upholds and imposes restrictions on the wanton sale or redistribution of intellectual or intangible property, of which the content of email transmissions are but one form out of many.Circumstantial evidence, suggests that Google LLC and Microsoft Plc work together on the maintaining of email and other social media websites and the transfer of associated data records between them. This is despite United States corporate registration legal guidelines for technology companies which stipulate that all internet collaborations should appear on an Internet Routing Registries list which contains information submitted and maintained by Internet Service Providers on shared projects. This would Include joint corporate enterprises such as the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) which creates separate Access Control Lists to permit or deny traffic on specific networks based on route registry information. No information on the joint data processing arrangement between Microsoft Plc and Google LLC is as far as I am aware, known to exist. Eventhough realtime information on their combined operations is difficult to obtain, without a warrant, or an installed telecommunications monitoring device the inferential evidence of their collusion, is quite high. Their telecommunications, software and internet market dominance statistically now appears to be close to the level of a market oligopoly, in some regions of the globe.To effect such a tethering of their financial business operations and their computer and information technology processes, there are likely to be a number of undeclared software compatibility tests and financial arrangements between the two companies. At boardroom level the development of their software and internet linked corporate model is likely to be approached from three quite distinct perspectives: firstly, agreement on their combined corporate policies; secondly an agreed set of business rules including; subscription or an agreement to subscribe for securities of one or both companies; or its subsidiaries or to underwrite, sub-underwrite or guarantee subscriptions for any such securities of one or both companies; and thirdly; the outlining of the technical specifications for shared product development and any new technological innovations. Periodically each company’s policies on their joint strategy will be reviewed and developed in consultation, primarily, with each corporation’s investment and strategic planning committee and their respective finance and audit teams. In conjunction with their computing departments each committee will take into account the uncertainty inherent in any forward looking business model and then create a joint software marketing and sales approach. It will need to provide flexibility for accurate future scenario planning; integration with each company’s finance system; and be required to support the iteration and updating of actual software testing results, departmental budgets and official forecasts. Whilst the exact nature and extent of their financial entanglements is predictably more of an issue for a team of Californian state auditors or the IRS, I can, within limits of course, provide a little insight into how certain shared software operational standards are likely to be arrived at by information technology firms working covertly and in unison. In this instance, in order to synchronize their online internet operations, it is likely to be the case that a combined Microsoft/Google programming unit would be assembled, either in one site or clustered across several locations. JavaScript is the shared programming language used by Microsoft and Google joint programming teams, and it supports interactive communications in accessing internet web browsers, popular searchengines and managing downloadable software, music and film videos, internet conference calls and other online applications. The same programming language is also used to manage and operate the communication and hardware access gateways on the internet network server that is nominally controlled by my Internet Service Provider EE. A vertically displayed touch sensitive software screen on a Perspex wall would probably be used to depict and move overlapping data flow and feedback model diagrams. Programmers can then construct an unlimited number of data transmission scenarios for instant display. These would tend to initially be centered on, the data processing requests of an idealized consumer software user or a machine, which would be interactively communicating with an online searchengine or website and any auxiliary email account portals. Both computer programming teams would generally use the same visual schematic model, using known procedures with the test results reflected within a strategic planning model at an aggregated level. Clear visual mobile representation of data programming entities will provide a straightforward monitorable means of capturing the flow of data movement across a hypothetical software website interface. At various stages in the testing process there will be team discussions concerning the value of the inclusion or the exclusion of each modular piece of software programming code and the associated risk factors if any, linked to the code segment remaining as part of the telemobile computer program that has been schematically represented. Once the visual software testing has been completed those items of code found to be inflexible or too lengthy and therefore responsible for limiting the ability of the programming team to refresh the testing model and to run different test case scenarios under times series conditions will also be removed.In this way the software team will reduce the possibility of the deleterious effects of accidental data strings or malicious program code being introduced into, and remaining in the program, and being undetected and effecting the integrity of, for example, a network server access procedure; or a Gmail or MSN/Hotmail password security and user identification and email account access routine. If sections of erroneous code are found at any stage in the implementation process the lead systems analysis team will make functional recommendations and systems programmers will make the necessary syntactical and semantical changes to individual data strings in the program code modules to delete the incorrect data block or lines and to make the amended code much simpler and quicker for software maintenance teams to review at a later stage and for the compiler to process at runtime during the testing of an executable program.It is likely to be the case that Microsoft and Google will use a specially developed cross-compiler as their software programs are built to connect with other computers whose CPU or Operating System is different from the one on which their dual standard independent compilers run.Basic machine to machine, anti-intrusion joint computer software program defenses are constructed, tested and installed when quite specific alterations to retail software are due to be made. For example, when a new version of the Microsoft Windows operating systems is being devised; or when changes to a Google web browser or a Google searchengine and its listing procedures. Software defenses are also normally reexamined when Gmail or Googlemail email new account designs and updates are planned. Appropriate software anti-hacking, anti-virus testing regimes will be even more rigorous than those usually carried out for conventional software upgrades. So the number of hypothetical software consumers trying to access the modelled schematic website or proxy email address set up for stress testing can be increased by several degrees and, exponentially if needs be, and if such stress tests show the inbuilt software defenses to be ineffective in delivering the correct defensive response or responses to an outside threat, solutions will again be drawn up and embedded in the code to rectify any identified problems. Conventionally, this might require, for example an enhanced hypertext transfer protocol for delivering precise computer security defense hypertext manipulation language options and a variety of rigid hyperlinks, for their jointly shared web application programs and internet and social media systems interfaces.However, there are obvious weaknesses in the programmed based security defenses of both Google and Microsoft meaning that neither corporation can ensure that whilst an internet user is connected to one of their software or internet media sites that the server they are connected to is the correct one. Nor can they certify that the data requested by an email or social media account holder from a third party over the internet is the same as that which is delivered or downloaded. There is also a legal implication within all social media and email account contracts, that ostensibly guarantees that rights of the consumer when a website based email message or social media data is received or downloaded from another telemedia or domestic intranet address. It is implied that the data received will be actually in the same format, with the correct semantic content, as originally dispatched from the sender’s ISP internet address and website, or email or social media account. However, such assurance by Google LLC or Microsoft Plc are unsustainable given their limited software security procedures.Both corporations computer security defences arenot strong enough at the junction between website and server to withstand determined efforts to rewrite password data security codes and the subsequent creation by a skilled programmer of an infinite data entry loop which will cause a password security program to accept a string of data or a singular datum but ultimately prevent the successful acceptance of a new password or other user identification code by a server network an email account or a social media website. Additionally, unauthorized new information can be added to the security and access routine of an email or other social media account by a third party. This can grant email or social media account access to a totally different user or a hive of users in remote locations. Eventhough when an original account username remains the same the account holder or holders may have their entitlement to exclusive email or social media access compromised or even denied completely in some cases. Situationally, other than in incidences of an outright email password entry block, the impression is created, despite the intervention by an intruder that the social media or email account and the data within it are still only viewable and under the privileged control of the person or persons who opened and maintained it. Unknowingly, existing email and other social media correspondents can continue to assume that they are communicating exclusively with the correct person or email or social media group. It is often the case that they arenot. Social media and email accounts holders will be unaware that their internet accounts can be cloned and that their private data can be displayed on numerous computer screens as a read and write random access visual data file for some Joe Liges to gawp at in their home or office or on a cellphone on a Palo Alto street corner. This security gap allows the possibility that data can be sent illicitly from an internet user’s email or social media website by an unauthorized person using a cellphone to an unknown and theoretically untraceable ISP address. Genuine social media and email account owners would not even know that their accounts had been either accessed or that their incoming emails had been sent to another file in their email account, or diverted and sent to the email account of another email account user who they do not even know. Whole files. Email messages. Social media data feeds. Downloads. All forms of received social media and email correspondence can be read, altered or deleted by an unauthorized user prior to their email and social media accounts being opened and their correspondence being checked by their legitimate owners. As all American computer scientists know, and I mean all American, a supercomputer mainframe virtual machine in private hands can provide unlimited multiple screening options to unauthorized viewers across the globe. In consequence because of the inability of Microsoft and Google to mitigate against these structural weaknesses in their network and software defences the State expects that both corporations be required to take additional measures, and increase their dilligence in detecting software and network defects. They will be required to ensure, as far as is practicable, that their software and network systems can rapidly determine the scope of any breach in data security before recommending such products to potential purchasers. Thoroughly tested software systems should be able to determine at the end of the test cycle the time and source, of a security breach and whether it originated within the United States or abroad or if it was caused by the actions of an authorized or unauthorized person or if it was due to the planned or unplanned intervention of an unmanned or automated computer system. Suitably configured software defense systems will be able to detect if any data erasure, data duplication or data transfer has occurred if a security breach is discovered. If a breach has taken place both Google LLC and Microsoft Plc must be able to ‘restore the integrity of the data system’ and retrieve if applicable, all displaced data. At the current time both corporations are demonstrably unable to do either. An effective way of promoting more transparent and conformative results in relation to consumer complaints made against large IT corporations is of course to emphasize any known structural or personnel inefficiencies based on first-hand experience and real recorded evidence and then have it relayed back to the relevant institution. I have repeatedly encountered problems in the Microsoft and Google client email data defense, explanation and recovery process. It suggests to me that there is a high probability that both companies use relatively out of date personnel training regimes, at middle managerial level in particular, leading in turn to a conveyor belt of relatively inefficient technical staff with little brain held knowledge of either Californian or US data protection or telecommunications law. Their staff have do not appear to have the sharpened ability to marry US electronic informatique regulations with consumer protection legislation. Their frontline technical staff can be less than capable of reacting dynamically to relatively small changes in the circumstances of social media or email accounts or the account holders. This in turn leads to the maintenance of poor advice records, inefficient time utilization and limited staff accessibility to the newest client data, whether contact with a client is carried out online, in person or over the telephone. This is evidenced by the fact that in relation to the blocking of my email accounts neither corporation’s technical staff could update their legal, or technical database records interactively whilst corresponding with myself whilst on the telephone, or by letter or online. They appeared not to have a customer file with the dates of previous recorded telephone or email correspondence records to hand. Presumably their email and social media customer account digital ledger, or individual account records are just as summarily recorded. I have made over eight email password block related complaints to either Microsoft or Google in the past twelve years. Each complaint should be recorded in a company complaints file or a personal file listing the date of each complaint, coupled with my address and personal details, which incidentally have not changed at all. Judging from their responses to my complaints it would appear that both corporations are prepared to deny in the exchange of particulars, and in court that I have lodged formal complaints regarding email blocked access against them in the past. Complaints which were all resolved after an exchange of emails sent from my now blocked secondary email accounts and letters and interventions by my local Member of Parliament in London. It is also likely, that neither company uses, at selected periodic intervals, modern data sensitivity measurement analyses techniques or regular updates of their defenses as recommended by cybersecurity institutions in the IT industry. Basic attention to such details can help define any prior breach of data security before the launch of new or upgraded software or the changeover to another email or social media platform. For example, in the critical period before a wholescale changeover from MSN email accounts to Microsoft Outlook a data breach sensitivity test should take place to check the security of the connection between an email client such as Microsoft outlook and an email server such as Microsoft exchange.Both corporation’s executive boards are acutely aware that if an information technology based company suffers from exposure to repeated data breaches of its data security defenses; it is a portent for other negative underlying structural conditions including those which may necessitate corporate surgery and financial restructuring. Generally, these are factors that I associate with the onset of industrial and commercial retrenchment and permanent decline.Their corporate level, bulk order sales legal, managerial and technical staff, and their single and large order online and instore level, sales management teams, will also need to reappraise their incorporation of rules from sale of goods, and copyright protection legislation at the point of sale online or instore and be prepared to do so in realtime if it is needed. As of the moment, neither Microsoft or Google can legitimately claim that their risk assessment systems, including it must be said their technical personnel are effective in interactively underwriting and insuring against data security threats to their clients.On first reading it may seem that the matters raised in my dispute with Microsoft Plc and Google LLC do not give rise to a series of data protection legal issues but rather reveal a litany of customer service errors and missed performance parameters. However, there are transparent data protection legal issues involved that support a prima facie claim in a court of law for damages or indeed special damages against the prospective defendants. Elements of the claim can be framed in terms of corporate negligence and the establishment in law of a factual breach of duty of care with foreseeable loss or deliberate corporate maladministration. Now we may turn to the current legal status of the two corporations in relation to their possible failure to comply with US regulatory procedure on the status and meaning of a business joint enterprise for a US company listed on the New York Stock Exchange. Legally, any unlisted commercial collaborations and issues of non-compliance with stock exchange rules, by the two companies are an issue for the market surveillance department of the New York Stock Exchange Regulation monitors. If an investigation by the NYSE is deemed necessary, and proven to be in the public interest, it will be undertaken to protect investors, to prevent manipulation of the market and to restore confidence in the running of either company. An NYSE investigation will look at any claims of unlawful or unethical behaviour by either company and if necessary report their findings to the Securities Exchange Commission to determine whether sanctions are appropriate. When undertaken, the usual reasons for an investigatory probe can be given by the regulatory authorities to the board members of Microsoft Plc and Google LLC. If that is, explanations are genuinely needed. Similarly, for Californian and United States federal taxation purposes, considering the apparent interdependency of each corporation both companies would need to have a declared, beneficial interest, to comply with each tier of relevant taxation law within each jurisdiction. Such a beneficial interest would probably be centered on joint agreements to share software technical specifications, pool software engineering resources and to annotate, list and distribute a number of undeclared and unregistered patents which will deliberately not be submitted to the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Both companies would thus avoid being held liable to pay United States corporation tax on revenue from the sale of all software products that include the patented items or derived intellectual properties. In the European Union in order to comply with relevant territorial legislation, each corporation would also need to file for patent registration marks with the European Patent Office and with the patent office of each national state where their software is sold in order to obtain multiple patent licences for all of the relevant European countries. Each corporation would also escape taxation in the US and the European Union on the nominal royalties gained by their joint investment in tax deductible economies of scale driven research and development programs. Then the proportion of their profits accrued from their lessened industrial process costs, is used to increase their marketing spend, and to saturate selected regional markets with internet, social media or conventional software products increasing their online internet and mobile telephonic presence and monopolising advertising revenue increasing the value of their market capitalisation. It reinforces their warped official corporate view, that their poorly disciplined financial capital base is the leading leverage based economic model for the computer software and internet market and related industries. It is not. It aids their domination of global online searchengine options; and underpins their leading positions in the information technology, internet and software production and associated services markets. It distorts the information technology market leading to each company perpetually recording above the curve abnormal profit margins relative to other competitors in the sector. Year on Year. It provides wholly disproportionate dividend returns for their shareholders and overvalues the earning per share ratio of the entire United States internet industry. Furthermore what is often left publically unsaid, in broadsheet analysis of the US technology sector, in respect of Microsoft Plc and Google LLC, is that their outright dominance of the technology sector routinely forces cellular phone and personal computer manufacturers and distributors in the US, Europe and Africa in particular, to favour their products and to make the inclusion of their internet searchengines and other software a legally binding and compulsory part of any mass order sales agreement. It increases their overall profit margins and revenue and renders the stocking of other software and hardware product options uncompetitive for wholesale importers, online distributors, retailers and insurers. Alternative software manufacturers are unable to compete on price and variety as well as product guarantees and online and over the counter insurance offers. More susceptible to inflationary price increases and are unable to defray passing on increased costs onto wholesalers and online retailers making their products more uncompetitive.Even after subtracting from the economic equation, the often irrational preferences that will persuade consumers to pay more for a particular technology brand rather than pay less for a similar alternative product their current sales statistics give a false picture of the long term commercial prospects and value of Microsoft Plc and Google LLC and their respective revenue intake. Venture capital funds and banks are less willing to treat their software investment and property rights, as low expense, high growth, projected royalty income streams that involve little to no negative cash flow. Thus they will continue lessening the value of their intellectual property and royalty based assets when they are proposed as collateral. This in turn forces both companies to rely more than ever before on short to medium term arbitrage; or expected profit based equity finance; or retained earnings rather than on advances from the banking sector.Each company is required under US law to submit formal returns setting out their marketing and administration expenditure and demonstrating that it has fallen within the limits declared by them. An auditor’s reading of each company’s balance sheet, cross checked with their annual company accounts and likely tax returns, prior to submission to the IRS at both state and federal level will show that their accountancy procedures are deliberately misleading.In relation to my own internet and email profile status, any theoretical conflict of identity issues with anyone living in, or outside of the United Kingdom can be summarily dismissed by the court. Likewise, in the United States, no alternative profiles with the same name or similar and with closely matching details have been brought to my attention by the security or legal teams at either technology corporation and cited as a reason for their joint refusal to reopen my email accounts. I have not seen online any alternative internet profiles bairing my name, which could be mistaken for mine by a stable person with an average IQ. There are no other legitimate claimants to any of the email accounts, I have sent correspondence from, or alternative claimants to the email messages I have received. Neither have I ever, received an email message addressed to someone who could be defined as a namesake and which was clearly not meant for myself. Not a single ground exists for any claims that my email accounts and their contents, were intended for another person and consequently should be held indefinitely or redistributed. Not one. Arguments, suggesting that there might be, would if raised before the bench by either the technical or legal teams of Microsoft Plc or Google LLC amount to little more than tiresome courtroom theatrics, masquerading as reason, and a wholly illegitimate defence strategy, designed to obstruct the court’s right of inquisition and my right to recover access to my email accounts and the data held within them. But, if the prospective defendants insist, that they have world class computer scientists at their disposable, that can double up as telecommunications and data regulation attorneys, to argue the adverse, I’m sure that juristicians and students of legal theory, in the state of California and in the European Union will be intrigued.As a matter of secondary, supporting, and mere inferential interest to the court, I can point out that my professional reputation in Africa, Australasia, Europe, and the United States is extensive. Thus although I live outside of the United States, my current domicile is known to the Central Intelligence Agency, Federal Bureau of Investigation, the National Security Agency and to a group of American lawyers who visit Runnymede in England once in a while. All four groups can confirm, if required, in any manner they choose that I live in the United Kingdom and that I am professionally recognised in Europe. As the Royal Society of Medicine in London, will verify, I am one of the most notable British based medical scientists of the past fifty years. Additionally, I am also a historical figure in American Information Technology, formal logic, logic programming and computer science and was known to boardroom staff at Google LLC and at Microsoft Headquarters in the USA and London prior to my current complaints. My reputation in computing alone was known at the IEEE, Microsoft, Apple, MIT and IBM and at the various collegiate centers of the University of California in the nineteen eighties. Nor am I regarded as an anonymous outlander within the Ivy League teaching and alumni network in both the USA and in London. My contact details, are, logged with various data collection departments at the National Institutes of Health in Bethesda, Maryland, and by, US, financial corporations, teaching academies, and historical societies.If the court for a moment chooses to focus on the conduct of Microsoft Plc and Google LLC and their joint enterprise, it is to be assumed that both corporations believe that they are acting within the parameters of legality. Nothing however, could be further from the truth, their joint conduct and the behaviour of Microsoft in particular, obviously amounts to a clear defense of their conduct centered on blatant false representation and concealment of material facts. The failure by the Microsoft Plc online technical team and their telephone support staff to take the requisite action to restore access to my email accounts, coupled with the written statements I have received from the corporation, indicate that Microsoft’s obstructional behaviour, is intended to ensure that I am severely prejudiced by the delay and constitutes a deliberate and malicious and knowing, foreseeable, and aggressive attempt at restraint of my right to trade and to use my own name in online communications. Such difficulties were obviously foreseen by the MSN/Hotmail technical team before they sanctioned the email password blockages. Therefore, Microsoft broke the implied terms of trust and confidence between an internet email or other social media service provider and a client which is inherent in all telemedia contracts. That such a situation, should persist, without immediate resolution, only emphasizes the clear onesidedness of the security matters involved, highlighting those issues that are to the detriment of myself the data subject and email account user, and those issues that overwhelmingly benefit Microsoft Plc the data service provider and data controller.An inordinate delay in my using my email accounts also allows both Microsoft Plc and Google LLC to claim that each of my email accounts has been inactive for too long and that as a result they are entitled to assert that I have voluntarily ceded my rights to retain each account thereby breaking any legal chain of causation tied to their own conduct and negating the possibility of a civil claim. Both email service providers, would then consider themselves free of any legal responsibility to maintain my accounts and then argue that they have the right to unilaterally close them, and sanction a permanent denial of my right of access, retrieval and transfer of all my email data to any other email account I open. They would not consider theirselves legally obliged to protect my email accounts from being illegally accessed by any unauthorized third party. Effectively, both companies are attempting to force through an act of novation, enacted by the unsanctioned closure of my existing email accounts and the repudiation of each individual email contract. Once that is achieved, the repercussions are, that I am then required to open up new email accounts and reenter into new contracts with each email service provider, but, and here is the caveat, I would then lose my rights to all of the data retained in my former accounts which both companies would then hold on their respective email servers as some type of corporate lien.As a very straightforward cognitive exercise, which the court may undertake before the hearing it is possible, to pose the rhetorical, and ask whether it is reasonable to believe that companies of the size, experience and efficiency Microsoft Plc (listed on the NASDAQ) or Google LLC (again NASDAQ listed, this time under the title of its parent company Alphabet Inc.) could lose track of sent or received email data or lose a complete email account or be unable to verify the details of the owner. A rational mind would quickly consider the facts and conclude that each scenario is almost unthinkable. There is no need for you here to consider an obvious, and rapidly constructed logical but purely semantic counterargument. If a process of email data loss or access denial of this type was to be defined and depicted schematically step by step, by a systems analyst it would be seen as a very simple argument to repudiate and a virtually impossible stance to maintain at a very early stage in the analysis process. Should such corporate practices be confirmed as regular occurrences, the simple possibility would lead to a general brokerage review of the share Price/Earnings ratio of both Google LLC and Microsoft Plc on the New York Stock Exchange, the Paris bourse, the London Stock Exchange where the ordinary shares of both companies are brokered. Similar decisions would probably be carried out by Wei traders on the Shanghai stock exchange on both ordinary and B class shares as well. Microsoft Plc and Google LLC ordinary shares are already apparently, judging by brokerage reports seen by registered stockbrokers and independent investors in North America and Europe alike as overvalued, tradeable commodities, on the grounds, amongst other things, that neither company will adequately guarantee the security, and accessibility on demand of customer data. Moreover, my complaint indicates, that both companies are unable to prove that their data security systems including those concerned with identity verification, have been adequately tested and that they are operating correctly. Neither company can demonstrate to an acceptable standard that their software testing and operational environments are completely separate, and that their network security devices are properly configured. As mentioned earlier it appears to be a fairly straightforward process for an unauthorized person, to be able to obtain Google and Microsoft default network server passwords in order to access the social media and email accounts of other people. A precarity, which of course, increases the risk of financial or systemic disadvantage to corporate clients, to independent traders, medical professionals and members of the general public who use their software or email portals and web sites. Both Microsoft Plc and Google LLC have to take the necessary steps to restore the integrity and defensive soundness of their data telecommunication systems and email and social media sites. It is noted that in June 2018 the CIA pulled out of a proposed billion dollar cloud data storage contract with Google LLC. The court, and the legal community in general, may assume that the reasons I have outlined above influenced the CIA directorate to make the correct decision.We can of course consider it likely that the Central Intelligence Agency would have put it to the tender/bid legal and technical team of Google LLC, during their negotiations over the cost and implementation strategy of the recently aborted proposed Cloud contract that: even when email and social media data is considered to have been ‘erased’ from a database processed on a super computer with a requisite server, from the viewpoint of a computer defense operative, a total eradication or complete disappearance of stored email or social media data is quite difficult to achieve. It is usually the case that such an end gambit is mentally ruled out prior to any computer security forensic investigation. Equally from a physicist’s perspective the likelihood of their being untraceable email or social media data records is also virtually impossible to countenance. You can delete the emails and associated data, such as address book contacts, from a visible and accessible email account, but you can not necessarily destroy them. This would also apply during the immediate damage assessment period immediately after a computer hack has been detected. I was tutored in the same data protection and telecommunications security principles decades ago in university. Before the term cybersecurity was even coined. Such guidelines are familiar to current undergraduate and postgraduate degree students on computer science based courses.Email and other data received via an android device for example, can be stored and backed up in a data cloud and retrieved. I suspect that both Gmail and MSN/Hotmail have done something similar with my email accounts; that is to say, they are likely to have stored my email data on a data cloud server in a third country, the Irish Republic, Iceland, Portugal or Liberia, being distinct possibilities and by doing so they avoid, in theory, United States federal law on the storage, retention and disposal of telecommunicated data records.I would not normally hazard an opinion, on the precise technicalities involved in initiating a full computer system override, from a remote location but on this occasion, I can, in the absence of a confirmation theory offer, a grounded and deductive, but nonetheless still informed speculative view of the options, used to affect the simultaneous disconnection of my internet service and the blocking of my email passwords.Firstly, severing the connections could have been carried out by a rather basic, crude and robotic, Real Independent Computer Controlled Intelligence System, of the type that has been in existence since before the first Gulf war. An automated RICCI system will allow an operator to indulge in enhanced methods of selection and targeting for tactile directed electronic manipulation of a variety of objects. In principle the premise behind the RICCI model, is that an electronically engineered neural network is created and then embedded in the hardware/software interface of a computer. Then the scale, speed and trajectory of synapse to synapse electron activity within the brain’s cerebral cortex can be replicated. The quantum neurological and electronic sensory inputs and outputs which occur when the brain instantiates the electrical muscular activity which controls the tactile movements of human hands for example can be automated and reproduced. A RICCI system can be seen as a variation of the brain computer interface interface modality, used in the control of modern standard neurological implants which allow the enhancement, reproduction and reconnection of neuromuscular electrical signals. If an arm or a leg has been severed in a motorway accident for example, the neurological implant will allow the disabled person to move a prosthetic brain controlled limb (BCL) and the appendages attached to it.Secondly, the computer system override and disconnections could have been initiated via a sequence of electronically aided quantum mechanical human thought processes of the type that convert a: Correlational Opposition-Ratio Enhanced (CORE) neurological electron signal in the brain into an electron manipulation operation. By way of explanation, we may examine in less detail than usual, it must be said, the rudimentary, mid to late 20th century CORE operational, medical and electronic origins of the thought processions, that orchestrate an neuroelectronic manipulative event. More importantly an event that will effect an unattached physical object. Contemporary neuroscience assures us, that the brain’s hippocampi controls memory, spatial navigation and electric fields and that ephaptic communication between the fibers of the nervous system is caused by the exchange of ions between cells. From that which precedes, we can deduce the following, namely, that at the precise moment when ionic interchange occurs in the brain, the electrical fields generated can be microelectronically amplified and their oscillating evoked potentials turned into exogenous neural communication signals. With assistance, an individual can be trained to neuroelectronically generate these hyper sensitive neural electron waves,effectively, becoming a human command and control central node propelling electron particles outwards with a level of kinetic energy, strong enough to mimic the staged gated transmissions of a microelectronic telecommunications network command center. A human brain, wirelessly coupled to a mains or battery powered radio frequency linked portable computer with an inbuilt spectrum analyser, can log and record the correct coordinates of specific locations. Then the brain’s enhanced electron flow of energy can be aimed via the cornea at the circuitry of an electronic switch or at a visible computer in direct view or one secreted in a remote location. The electron surge can replicate the actions of an on or off electrical decision gate by being able to flip the circuitry of an electronic switch or the embedded stop and start button of a personal computer and begin instantiating the starting process. Electronic neurons contained within what is basically a robotronic disembodied electronic brain, can be primed to fire a flow of particle wave electrons transmitting a signal which can be sent through an electro-magnetic field.Essentially, the locate, command, control and eliminate procedure used in a CORE operation to wirelessly attack and incapacitate a computer is an adaptation of the non-invasive, nucleus revolving, medical investigatory techniques that began to be used by radiologists in the early 1990s. Illustratively, and for comparative purposes only, let us look at some very basic medical radiological techniques of the type that might be employed during a surgical operation in the modern era, the 21st century that is. You as a radiologist, are working in a hospital theatre, alongside a neuro-oncologist, an anesthetist, a nurse and a dosimetrist. After having created a viable treatment plan you are scheduled to go into a medical operating theatre to conduct a chemotherapy examination and radiotherapeutic surgical procedure to treat a patient with a malignant cancerous brain tumor.Your planned radiographic data scans, will highlight the patient’s brain structure, cranial neural interaction, healthy tissues and those neuroanatomical substrates and organs at risk which are perfused by major cerebral arteries. Ions emitted by the radiographic scanner will elucidate the cerebral hemispheric organization highlighting each area of cognitive, motor and sensory function and specialised virtual simulation software will provide a clear unobstructed view. By employing a common neuroimaging radiological technique such as Computerised Tomography or Functional Magnetic Resonant Imaging all the radiological activity in the brain can be observed as conformal planned three dimensional televisual imageries on a high definition realtime virtual pixelated computer screen or pictograph images or a sonographic ultrasound display with 360 degree onscreen sliding window rotational field capabilities, and enlargement and miniaturisation focus. What you are then presented with is an unobstructed onscreen map of the shape and location of the tumor which will accurately delineate and localize the area to be treated and the sensitive, cerebral structures and cognitive areas to avoid, when the cancer tumour is being sonicated. A route is outlined and a centrum highlighted for the pulsed external beam of image guided electro-magnetic frequency radiation to lock onto. Then the radiation dosage that will follow is delivered via two-dimensional pencil beams which possess the capability of realtime adjustment achievable by controlling, or modulating, the radiation beam’s intensity and changing the speed and shape of the beam with a multileaf collimator. To ensure patient safety, input from an oximeter watched over by a nurse, is used to monitor the degree of blood oxygenation, blood flow velocity and neural activation in the patient’s brain which radio frequency ablation of this type might impair. Thereafter, guided by you, the radiologist, the neuro-oncologist, can step back and observe with a beam’s eye view the process of curative cancer treatment as the area of a malignant cancerous neuroendocrine brain tumour is eliminated by a precisely targeted beam or several beams from various angles of ionising electron energy eminating from a cathode ray tube linear particle accelerator. Then the radiation emitted will intersect the tumor and damage the DNA of the cancerous tissue halting its growth and leading to its cellular death. However, the magnetic-electron ultraviolet light emitting target in the case of an omnidirectional radiological guided electron probe of a computer hard drive or mainframe server is, quite different to the conventional examinatory matter used by physicians in medicine and associated forensic radiological sciences. Rather than being an invivo or an invitro biological sample or an anesthetised human being, or a corpse in a post mortem autopsy case, the target is an inanimate, static or mobile remote or close field, metallic or non-metallic entity. An object which will be highlighted and colored in various shades of the electro-magnetic spectrum radiating a fluorescent glow.Once the target has been selected, a stream of pulsed energy can manipulate a heat induced cathode ray tube propelling magnetic field particles which are responsive to experiential stimuli and under directional control. The particles would be transmitted over a privately owned and dedicated, and human operated Local Area Network towards the positively charged screen of a PC, it's hard drive, or a Microsoft and EE linked operating system server located elsewhere. If the magnetic-electron beam is on point, it can render a computer or another target immobile or otherwise inoperable, change the data content within it, including in realtime, the text on a web page or the spelling and orthographic outlay of letters on a word processing sheet whilst the file is still open. It can fuse the wiring, or rewrite the machine code on computer hardware, alter the structure of a silicon BIOS chip; or deactivate the cooling fan of a mainframe computer situated in a remote location. It can begin instantiating the computer starting process. Halt the motor of a computer when it is in full and active operational mode or completely erase personal websites, block email passwords and delete or alter computer software. Although the effects of an electron computer attack are known it is an exaggeration to suggest, that a computer screen under an electron cyberattack would give of a telltale sign of an electron overload by giving of phosphorus radiance. This is because the quanta energy of an electron is absorbed by the magnesium-aluminium metal in a computer when a cyberelectron operation of this nature is carried out, so there need not be any visible sign of electron intervention at all. Therefore, I cannot be precise, as to the realtime, the disconnections took place as I do not have an electron or ionising radiation monitor or a magnetic field sensitive transponder attached to my computer which can sense an incoming magnetic surge or an electron overload and can record coordinates, and log and measure incoming precisely aimed electrons. But, if I or any other computer user had such a transmitter device installed on their computer, it could be adapted by an electronician and turned into a sensor array and the data on the stream of electron sent to a positioning system and used for realtime tracking of the position of the sender. If a computer is attacked in this manner each electron sent to it, could be returned, ionic particle by ionic particle to its originating source, or redirected as per the laws of physics as controlled energy targeting the cerebral cortex of another human, or aimed at the beating electrical cardiovascular system of a moving animal stopping the beast in its tracks.In theory, the originating source of the electro-magnetic field energy that caused the disconnection of my internet and email accounts is traceable. You are also well aware, that a system override of a home personal computer or a mainframe supercomputer can also be carried out wirelessly from outside the United States or the United Kingdom; and that a computer system override can be achieved by directed energy emitted from a privately or publicly owned orbiting space satellite or an aeroplane or a radiation beam relayed from earth to a space station reflector and then deflected to hit a target on the planet’s surface.My Internet disconnection could have been carried out and coordinated through the main UK, postal and telephone telecommunications centre in the Mount Pleasant district, of north east London with electronic instructions issued from a PSTN console based computer screen command center with a full duplex switch panel under the control of a human operator. The telecommunications, internet and software systems of Microsoft Plc, Google LLC and EE in the United Kingdom are connected via a closed intranet network linking all three companies, across international borders with the likely acquiescence of state authorities.As regards infringements of the consumer protection laws of various United Nations territories and compositional federal states by the named corporations, my view of the legal position of Gmail and MSN/Hotmail; and EE; in relation to Californian United States, UK, and European Union legislation, is that all three corporations have been, since the 1stof May 2018 in breach of contract law applicable to each territory. In order to aid the court’s understanding of my contractual position with each named corporation, I can state, firstly that the internet connection contract between myself and the internet service provider EE is facilitated via a monthly direct debit arrangement under which I pay a specified amount, for uninterrupted broadband internet access for a set period of time. Actionable grounds for citing a breach of contract by either party are contained in the standard terms and conditions of the contractual agreement. Secondly, I have a set of confirmed online non fixedterm contracts, with both Gmail and MSN/Hotmail, in which reasons for a breach by either party are clearly stated. As regards consumer rights in the United Kingdom these are generally considered to be covered under the: United Kingdom Consumer Protection Act (2015), the remit of the Act is in no way comprehensive and should in my view, extend to the settlement of civil disputes concerning digital content whether it is paid for or supplied free with the option of paid for services. Currently UK law does not adequately cover digitized products and further lawyering and the introduction of new legal regulations on the issue are needed. Of course, what I am alluding to here, in the first instance, is the introduction of an amendment to the UK Consumer Protection Act (2015) that would be in keeping with the proportionate rise in internet commerce and associated payment assurances, mobile telephonic currency transactions, telemedical portable monitors, and injective devices, prosthetics and other wearable surgical equipment, and online personal and financial data storage.An amendment to the UK Consumer Protection Act can ensure that a clause is incorporated, that emphasises the point, that if transmitted digital content does not conform to the relevant contractual obligations, that consumers in the United Kingdom should then have the right to a repair or replacement of the aforesaid digital content. Existing UK consumer protection legislation allows for the reimbursement of the cost of faulty equipment in such situations but entitles no mandatory compensation for data loss. This is an obvious anomaly in the application of UK law.In actual fact, it is my interpretation of the future potential of telecommunications and consumer law in the state of California and throughout the remaining United States, and the European Union and how such new legislation may be applied in practice, is that if, whilst data is being processed digital content is returned or resupplied corrupted, or returned with noticeable omissions after an interruption in the continuity of data transmission has occurred, a consumer, corporate or individual has the legal right to force the corruptor of the data be it a broadband, email or internet service provider if proven, to repair the disarranged digital content, and replace the omitted data or be liable for monetary damages for the loss or the corruption of such data and the individual or corporate consumer may reserve the right to sue in court for monetary compensation in the form of unliquidated damages.An entitlement to compensation would correspond to the enforceable rights and remedies of a hypothetical plaintiff in a civil dispute, concerning the nature of actual, and fixed corporate liability where for example an electricity utility company is defined and assumed in law, as being potentially liable for monetary damages in negligence, devoid of intent, if a circuit breakage or powercut occurred in the home, at a factory, workary or office effecting the processing, legibility or memoritic storage of computerised and processable data held by a complainant. This should apply under the California Civil Code, United States federal law and under European Union legislation where the causal act or omission in question, is legally defined as an event leading to a negligent occurrence due to nonenvironmental factors.Regarding legislative exemptions to the extent of occupational or occupier’s liability in legal disputes involving the disruption of telecommunications transmissions which interrupt the processing of decipherable electronic data and or cause its loss, the court can take note that restrictions in law on the prosecutability of a freehold property owner or the proprietor of a leased or sublet premise be it private or corporate are not countervailing in the state of California. Given the cross border applicability of certain precepts of English law within nations that are predominately English speaking, it remains to be seen whether statutory legal exemptions from civil liability and a claim for damages for potential defendants in telecommunications disputes exist in the US due to what is sometimes termed by juristicians in the United Kingdom as, an Act of God. I may assert too, that complainants in telecommunications, data processing and social media and email disputes in the European Union and the United States should have the right to sue for the restoration of a deleted email account or other types of social media accounts. They should also be entitled to seek an injunction in a court of law, or equivalent authority to prevent the deletion of any email or social media account records by a service provider or the reallocation or sale to a third party by an email or social media service provider of a unique username, password or identification number. It should be borne in mind that an offer by an email or social media service provider to allocate a new username and a new password to a complainant’s profile, should a preexisting account be inaccessible, does not, unless mutually agreed, invalidate a contractual breach by the service provider involving the cessation of email or social media communications and any resultant data loss.Prior to a court or FBI application for an injunction against Microsoft Plc/Ltd and Google LLC preventing either from disposing or selling off my email accounts or usernames or incidentally those of any other American it should be clear to both potential defendants that no alternative accounts are to be set up and installed by third parties on Microsoft or Google owned websites which use the ‘Fearon’ forename and surname email address formats that I have listed and registered. This would apply whether the third party account in the ‘Fearon’ surname is in use as either an email alias or as an alternative email contact address. None of the email accounts I have registered using the ‘Fearon’ surname should be connected by Microsoft or Google to a third party email account or other social media account for the purpose of receiving diverted incoming emails originally intended for one of my listed accounts. Nor should a third party, who has registered an email account in another name be able to use any of my listed email accounts as a contactable and usable alternative email address if a password reset is needed to regain access to their primary email account and an alternative email address is required to receive a reconnection code be it alpha, alphanumeric or numerical. There are specified estimated limitations on the storage space for MSN/Hotmail email accounts (5 Gigabytes) and Gmail accounts (15 Gigabytes) space providing both companies with pseudo contractual reasons for not restoring all received email data. However, as computer mainframe electronicians, at Gmail and MSN/Hotmail know, all incoming emails to my accounts can be stored on a server if storage space in my email inbox is exceeded and it can no longer receive emails. Microsoft Plc or Google LLC have not produced an unanswerable technical or logical barrier to my complaints, and my background in the field of information processing allows me infer that there is not one. Therefore, the court may conclude that their corporate objections to the reopening of my email accounts are based on arguments that are either personal or due an adherence to some form of twisted political ideology and likely to have been endorsed at boardroom level and filtered down for enforcement by the management of their technical data recovery teams.In my opinion the ordinary shares of Microsoft Plc and Google LLC have a higher risk attached to them and mutual lower earnings growth potential in relation to other corporations in the telecommunications sector. Board members of both companies or a surrogate company, or independent brokers acting on their behalf will probably covertly buy their respective individual companies ordinary shares to uphold their share price and their company’s market capitalisation value, both of which are, as implied previously, grossly overvalued. Personnel details on the Google LLC board were unobtainable using online search engines. If they were viewable, I assume that they would reveal a number of interesting fiduciary appointments as well as unnamed trustees. The exoffficio members of their board would effectively form an institutional constructive trust whereby each person in a fiduciary position would be entitled to make an unauthorized and undeclared profit on their shareholdings or on the residual on any loans they have made to the corporation. despite the lack of transparency surrounding the details of the composition of board of Google LLC, the names, and ages of the Microsoft Plc board of directors and executive committee members were generally available online. Many of the names listed are aliases, used for tax avoidance purposes and a combined list is shown below:Satya NadellaAge 50William Gates IIIAge 62John ThompsonAge 68Charles NoskiAge 64Helmut Gunter PankeAge 71John StantonAge 62Teri List-StollAge 54Charles ScharfAge52Sandra PetersonAge58Padmasree WarriorAge 56Reid HoffmanAge 50Hugh JohnstonAge 55Penny PritzkerAge 58Arne SorensonAge 58Additional criteria on possible infringements of data privacy law are outlined in: Section.B.178 of the: California Electronic Communications Privacy Act (1986); detailing the legal prohibition of a third party from intercepting or disclosing electronic communications without authorisation from the data subject. It is my understanding upon reading the CECPA, that the status of my email accounts and their contents are also covered under section A.B.1541 as I am prevented from using my registered email addresses when combined with the correct password for access to my accounts. Indeed, the court may like to refer to: Senate Bill No.46 Chapter 396 of the State of California CivilCode2013 an act to amend Sections 1798.29 and 1798.82 of the Civil Code, relating to the retention of Personal Information and Data Privacy, by an agency, person or business in California in reference to a breach of the security of a computer system or personal data held within it. In this instance the security breaches would be the disconnection of my internet access and the rejection on input of my user identification codes and passwords for my email accounts and subsequent blocked email access. It should be noted by the court that the act stipulates that: ‘In the event of such security breaches being confirmed, the controller of the personal data is required to reveal any breach of the security of the system or data, to the person or organization whose data security is at risk or is believed to have been acquired by an unauthorized person’ or by an automated computer system. In particular, this applies to situations where a breach of data security involves the interception, retrieval and use thereafter of personal information that would permit access to an online email or other social media account by a third party.I would like a formal judicial recommendation to be made to both the Secretary of the Department of Justice and the Secretary of the Department of Business Oversight, in the state of California. I am advocating the passing of a future amendment to: Section 1798.29 of the State of California Civil Code relating to the retention and processing of personal information by a California based corporation. Subsequently matters can be sent to the Attorney General of the State of California with an additional recommendation that an amendment be made to the relevant act within the Californian Civil Code to include a clause which codifies the legal rights of overseas US and non US citizens, and foreign domiciled citizens resident in the state of California whose data is retained, processed and retransmitted over the internet or routed by telecommunications satellites owned by a US corporation with a fixed legal corporate identity and which is registered in the State of California for taxation purposes.Currently, individual citizens resident in the state of California and Californians who reside overseas or travel abroad for vacations, work or study, as well as other American citizens who use telecommunication services which are owned and controlled by Californian companies and who suffer a disconnection to their mobile telephony, or internet telecommunications, on for example a smartphone, kindle or a laptop computer or undergo a loss of their email services, resulting in a disruption to commercial or private activities, which may or may not include data loss; have limited enforceable rights of regulatory or statutory redress under either Californian consumer protection law or state data telecommunications legislation when their cause for complaint(s) arises irrespective of the location or locations. Californians arenot, it seems entitled to mandatory and equitable compensation, monetary or otherwise as justifiable payment for their inconvenience, loss of amenities and any resultant pecuniary disadvantage. So further legal remedies to protect Californians, and other American, digital data consumers are justifiably needed.At this juncture, I feel unfortunately, compelled to prepare you for my usage of a little more Latin, needed to emphasize a point of potential judicial deliberation on international law, the individual and the extent of territorial jurisdiction and whether such elements can be reenvisaged, interpreted and applied domestically in the state of California. Forthwith, it should be apparent to the court that the issues raised by the conduct of Microsoft Plc and Google LLC involve their international subsidiaries, based in the European Union. Most notably the Republic of Ireland. In light of such arrangements the, doctrinal legal principle of: erga omnes may have to be adopted in a mutually agreed manner to specifically enhance and protect the rights of individual citizens of the state of California and by implication, American citizens at home and abroad and non-Americans who use corporate services owned and supplied by American companies.The United States: Freedom of Information Act (1966) should in principle also apply in a US Federal civil law suit, involving myself as a single plaintiff or as a plaintiff likely to be cojoined with others in joint litigation against either Google LLC (Gmail); or Microsoft Plc/Ltd (MSN/Hotmail) or both. On this issue the advisory directions of the court as to the applicability of the of the Act may prove invaluable during the pretrial period. As the email blockage dispute involving Google(Gmail) relates to the activities of a United States company headquartered in California, my complaint may, and I stress may, also relate under Californian law to plausible grounds for civil litigation against Google LLC/Microsoft Plc under the: California Public Records Act (1968).To take this argument a stage further, the court might like to consider judicial rulings and statutory orders made under European Union legislative statutes, and European Union individual member state territorial bylaws, the state of California Civil Code, and United States federal law. In the first instance, it might well be the case that, Gmail, and MSN/Hotmail are in breach of the: United Kingdom Data Protection Act (1998/2018) and the UK General Data Protection Regulations Act 2018, in that they are restricting my rights as an individual to make a Subject Access Request regarding my own data as defined under the Act. Their actions amount to a clear breach of the legislation. As stated earlier it has to be recognised that neither corporation has taken the requisite technical and organizational security measures to prevent the unauthorized or unlawful processing, transfer, loss or destruction of personal data. Both corporations should be aware that the precourt settlement of UK Data Protection claims, are, referred to in European Union law on Alternative Dispute Resolution, and, supervened under: Article 15 of the European Union General Data Protection Regulations (GDPR 2018) which emphasises my rights as a data subject, to access my own data, and to be informed if such data is being shared with 3rdparties. A comparison with California and United States federal data law, on the sharing of data information with 3rd parties may also be regarded as appropriate by the court. All of my Gmail, and MSN/Hotmail email accounts and auxiliary records, such as the starting date of each contract, and which were stored on an updated Cray or an old IBM mainframe server before, on or after the 1st of May 2018 will have to be intact when my accounts are restored. Upon reviewing each agreed contract, I have determined that there is an absence of justifiable cause for the cessation of each internet service. I have committed no contractual infringements that would legally permit any of the providers to cease supplying their services with or without notification. I am not suggesting that it is illegal, for an email provider or internet service provider to act arbitrarily and without notice to interrupt internet or email telecommunications access. It is legal to do so, under particular circumstances as prescribed by Californian, United States, and individual European Union territories law. However, I am, in contravention, asserting that there are no legal grounds for preventing my internet and email access under Californian Law, United States Federal Law, or European Union law as introduced by the European Union Parliament or the European Commission or by the legislature of individual European Union member states. There have been no infringements by myself of laws, that relate to the illegal misuse of methods of telecommunications or forming and sending or attempting to send transmittable data of a malcontent and unlawful nature, be it crypted or unencrypted. Generally applicable prescriptive telecommunications and data protection legislation in the European Union and the United States relates to the prevention of a number of categories of auditory, visual, tactile telecommunicated acts, data transmissions, or, micro-transactions (including touch screen communications) and allows the permissibility of lawful intervention by a state agency, a service provider or a citizen. Disruptive methods employed include the retention of social media, or email data or the blocking of the transmission retransmission of stored data held in a social media or email account. Such interruptions are usually carried out, as we know, to prevent relayed data transmissions that would lead to a foreseeable threat to public safety or in extreme cases leading to a state of emergency. Restrictions on data transmission can also be employed to foreclose on telecommunications activities that could lead to or encourage the possible moral degeneration of a minor. Intervention may also be required to desist data transmissions that provide information that would assist in the abscontion of a suspect or a fugitive. There are also other generally specified or unspecified consensual legal grounds for intervention that reoccur from time to time within the jurisdiction of the state of California, or under the encompassing remit of United States federal legislation, or within the shared judicial territories of the European Union and which are all currently, valid legal reasons for intervention in telecommunications transmissions. However, the legal proviso to be considered here by all jurists, state agencies and citizens contemplating the sanctioning or legitimising of an intervention in data transmissions is, one of fidelity to lawful convention, and therefore interference in telecommunications and data displays should be justifiable, lawful and proportionate.Moreover, it should be noted that: Section 5(a) of the Federal Trade Commission Act (FTC Act) (15 USC §45)expressively states in clausal form the illegality of: ‘unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce, by a corporation and which causes or is likely to cause substantial injury to a consumer, and cannot be reasonably avoided by a consumer’. Its utility as a practical piece of data transmission law may need to be examined by the Bureau of Consumer Protection and members of Congress in the state of California. An amended state legislative codicil should be introduced into the California Civil Code based in part on the FTC Act. Guidelines, should be centered on the settlement of complaints by individuals wishing to litigate (including the self-employed) citing infringements of their contractual and commercial rights by corporations, or public authorities accused of using unfair, or deceptive practices or both. Public policy, as established by statute, regulation, or judicial decisions made in court, may be considered withall other evidence in determining whether, assuming intent can be proven, or negligence established, a particular corporate act, omission or practice falls outside the boundaries of legality.To encourage the expediation of the prompt lifting of restrictions on my ability to access my Gmail, and MSN/Hotmail registered email accounts(which are, as stated previously, in effect United States public, records); If the matters in dispute are not resolved by an exchange of particulars, within the next 28 days then either myself or an attorney acting on my behalf may retain the right to request, or petition (as I believe it is termed) the bench requesting that the prospective plaintiffs are made aware of the requirement that they comply with the law regarding the full disclosure, of any court, FBI, NSA or police orders issued in the State of California. This legal stricture applies to both Google LLC and Microsoft Plc and imposes an obligation on them to reveal any known court orders, police requests or directives from a state agency, in the European Union, sent to state authorities in California requesting the restricting of the disclosure of my registered email accounts and their content and any other associated public records. It also places the onus on Google LLC and Microsoft Plc to release upon request all available evidence supporting a European Union state, Californian or United States government agency’s decision of nondisclosure of my email account records.In cases where there have been legal precedential court rulings on the extent of the territorial remit of US law enforcement the court may like to review the declaratory judgement in the case of: US v Watchmakers of Switzerland Information Center Inc. 133 F Supp 40(1955), where certain activities undertaken by a US corporation put it in conflict with US legislation at the federal or municipal level. A similar legal principle was applied in the European Union legal theatre in respect of the questionable conduct of company subsidiaries in the case of: A Ahlstrom Oy V Commission [1988] ECR 5193. The court may also refer to the U.S Supreme Court appeal case ruling in the case of: United States v Microsoft Corp (2017); and the ultimate judgement of the bench, regarding the extraterritorial rights of US law enforcement agencies seeking to retrieve electronic data from an obstructive data holder Microsoft Corp, under: Section 2703 of the Stored Communications Act(SCA,1986), which set a legal precedent requiring American companies to produce remote data of which it has full control, when it is stored on servers outside of the United States, with no territorial limitations through the serving of SCA warrants. As I understand the matter, the FBI can ask for the creation of a mutual legal assistance treaty between the United States and another nation to assist in their data recovery during an investigation which requires cross-border law enforcement. Unfortunately, the right to use similar cross border legal entitlements and arrangements, are not legalities extended to Californian citizens.Expanding the remit of international law enforcement and cooperation on telecommunications and data mutual legal assistance treaties will need the inclusion as cosignatories of a number of nations who have not yet signed a joint protocol with the United States. Any new agreements that can be reached should provide legal coverage and protection for individual private US citizens involved in data and telecommunications disputes outside of the United States. These proposals will need to be considered in committee by Californian State and US Federal legislators.As the court knows the remit of the SCA has been superceeded and amended through the introduction by the United States Congress of the: Clarifying Lawful Overseas Use of Data Act H.R.4943 (Cloud Act 2018) a piece of legislation which allows US federal law enforcement agencies to compel US registered technology and telecommunications and data companies to provide requested data stored on a server on demand. Or require a corporation to supply the data upon receiving an appropriate warrant or subpoena irrespective of whether the data is stored in the United States or in a foreign territory. Further supersucession in law, on the range of both the CECPA and the CLOUD Act, is needed. A clarifying piece of legislation can be introduced by the state of California to incorporate a clause which caters for the legal entitlements of individual Californian citizens in relation to data processing and information transfer. New statutory changes to Californian law will need to be capable of being interpreted by an attorney or a court as legislative enactments which pair the rights of the individual in the state of California with the entitlements given to various States, Federal, civil, criminal and financial law enforcement agencies. Of course the implied complexity, in introducing new legislation at each level of the American legal system and the rigor needed to uphold such enactments will vary. Regardless of such minor impediments, in my opinion these future rights should be mandatory entitlements for all Californian and American citizens unless prescribed by statute and lawful reasons apply for statutory restrictions.Indeed, the court may like to refer to: Senate Bill No.46 of the State of California Civil Code regarding the retention of Personal Information and Data Privacy, in reference to a breach of the security of a system or its’ data, in this instance the disconnection of my internet access and the rejection on input of my user identification codes and passwords for my email accounts and blocked email access. I would like a formal judicial recommendation to be made to both the Secretary of the Department of Justice and the Secretary of the Department of Business Oversight, in the state of California advocating the passing of a future amendment to: Section 1798.29 of the State of California Civil Coderelating to the retention and processing of personal information by a California based corporation. Subsequently matters can be sent to the California state Attorney General with an additional recommendation that an amendment be made to the relevant act within the California Civil Code to include a clause which codifies the legal rights of overseas US and non US citizens, and foreign domiciled citizens resident in the state of California whose data is retained, processed and retransmitted over the internet or routed by telecommunications satellite owned by a US corporation which has a fixed legal corporate identity and is registered in California for the purpose of taxation.Microsoft Plc and Google LLC have both been involved in a clear abrogation of their legal contractual obligations. Citizens of the state of California, the United States, and European Union member states, local legislators and the judicial wing of the European Commission and Parliament have a clear legal interest in discouraging, preventing and if necessary, punishing such conduct. A breach of contract in relation to an agreement entered into by a European Union citizen, a Californian citizen and a United States corporation, regardless of whether the breach is carried out by a European registered subsidiary of the said United States company, in European Union territory or the breach is due to the actions of the US parent company, is a matter of interest to Californian citizens, state legislators, consumer protection organizations and citizens of the rest of the United States and to citizens of the European Union.In summation, I believe that I have not only made a compelling case in law against Microsoft Plc and Google but in addition, I have laid out reasonable grounds for the further harmonization of the law in California in relation to mobile telecommunications issues, and data disputes concerning the misuse of data, its’ loss, or inaccessibility and unwarranted interventions in data transmission when such incidents take place outside of the United States.It would be appreciated if the Department of Legal Affairs of the state of California, could take note of my opinions, and liaise with the DOJ and DOBO; and, the Sacremento Superior Court could forward my letter of complaint in the appropriate manner, to the head of Data Control/Legal Affairs at the Microsoft Corporation, Headquarters at One Microsoft Way, Redmond, WA 98052-6399.Yours SincerelyDr William F FearonCC: A. France and Sons, London, EnglandCC: Legal Department, Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern CaliforniaCC: Legal Department, Royal Society of Medicine, London, EnglandCC: Washington State Bar AssociationCC: A. Cheater, The Hundred, EnglandCC: CEN-CENELEC Management Centre, Brussels, BelgiumCC: Administrative Office of the Courts, Olympia, Washington State, USACC: Brain and Gamble, London, England

A great statesman is a great statesman I guess and where they come from is largely irrelevant. I can certainly imagine someone with zero political experience rising to the challenges of the presidency, but then I can imagine them falling flat on their asses too.I could just say ‘no,’ and get on with my day but in truth I think we have to look at the nature of Democracy and why we elect certain people in the first place.And that’s going to take me about 5000 words so… you have been warned.The real question is whether or not a statistical bias might exist that suggests the inexperienced maverick is less likely to succeed than someone who has chosen to take a more traditional path to power.Plato would argue that there must be.Democracy — he would say — is something of a shitty compromise. Well, OK, he wouldn't use those exact words. He’d probably have said something along the lines of “Η ακρίβεια βράζει,” but my point remains valid.Because he understood that a weak argument could destroy a strong argument if the weak argument was wielded by a ‘smooth talking fucker' or ‘σοφιστής,’ as he would have put it. The used chariot salesmen — gifted in the art of persuasion — might sell the mob a lemon or even-- as we learned to our collective chagrin in 2016 -- an orange.For Plato, only members of an idealized class of citizens should be allowed to rule. Such men — because, of course they would have to be men to an Athenian mind-- would undergo a rigorous and lengthy training process that was in many ways not dissimilar to the kind of preparation contestants had to go through prior to auditioning for the 1990’s hit show ‘Gladiators.’Military service was to be combined with years of quiet, contemplative study designed to take an ordinary citizen and transform them into someone resembling/actually being Dan Clark AKA Nitro from the 1990’s hit show ‘Gladiators.’Or…As Plato called them, Philosopher Kings; incorruptible paragons of virtue. Forbidden to own property and having dedicated their lives to the state-- thanks to the incessant whining of a limited electorate – such fine fellows were sure to be in the best possible position to make the kind of smart decisions that one has to make when one’s city is defended almost exclusively by lightly armored hoplites. Here was a solution to the terrifying notion of trusting decision making to the kind of people who put the ‘Demos’ in democracy; yet it it was beset with a single, simple flaw hidden somewhere in the small print.“What,” the perspective demagogues asked, “is all this crap about not owning property?”Most of human history — the vast majority of it in fact-- was entirely undemocratic. In fact, I’d go as far to say that it was positively ‘ademocratic,’ but my spell checker is insisting that isn’t even a word and as someone who struggles with dyslexia on a daily basis I trust my spell checker like pregnant women trust warning signals sent from their bladder region.The conspicuously late arrival of democracy to the ‘party,’ as it were, was hardly surprising.History is not as you might suspect, a series of things that happened. On the contrary, it is a thing that is happening right now and will continue to happen for quite some time (although sadly, not for ever.) It’s all a matter of perspective really.Well, that and the conjugation of verbs.I have doubtlessly harped on about this before so in brief. History moves through periods because history has a direction and that direction is progressive. Societal contradictions have to be ‘ironed out’ sooner or later via a process known as the Master/Slave dialectic. Said dialectic was conceived of by Hegel, one of the greatest minds of all time which is a pity because his work is mostly so difficult to understand that few people have the ten or twenty years it generally takes to decipher it. Fortunately, I have dedicated my life to trying to teach such ideas to people as best I can and an easily digestible explanation I wrote can be found here. I know what you’re thinking but I don’t get any royalties whatsoever from your purchase of such a book; I got a flat fee.And I already spent it.People — it was thought — are simply too stupid to know what's right for themselves and yet the undeniable truth – that there were an awful lot of them – was something of a problem. They kept sort of… rising up in rebellion and although most uprisings were suppressed they happened often enough that some of them— inevitably— stuck. Slave societies fell out of fashion and were replaced with feudalism, a sort of a cross between slavery and a crooked time share scheme. And although Feudalism contained fewer contradictions than the system that went before it, it was riddled with contradiction nonetheless. The concept of a hereditary monarchy was just no good. Endless internecine squabbling, dusted with a thick coating of fratricides, civil wars, decapitations and pink rose scented frosting… wait no that’s cakes… the occasional ill-timed bouts of life threatening dysentery a few dozen cases of dynastic implosion topped off with marzipan facsimile of the bride and groom to be… wait no, that’s wedding cakes.But you take my point.Idiot sons inherited vast lands. Brilliant younger sons were sent to distant corners of the land where they would brood and plot the kind of revenges that tended to end with several fields filled with dead peasants and not a lot to show for it. When not waging war they were often enjoying endless parties and indulging in the kind of sexual depravities that led to them walking home through the streets of London at 3am looking like a plasterer's radio.Best not try to unravel that simile is my advice.It was a horrible system. Indeed, if we still used it today, were Donald Trump to be found slumped over his desk (with a KFC Double Crunch Sandwich lodged sideways in his gizzard and a phone displaying the half-finished tweet ‘I have the widest mouth,’) Donald Trump Jnr would automatically assume the office.Shudders all round.Still, there was something Platonic about the whole thing. With a few notable exceptions, the monarchs of Europe and Asia were among the best educated people in the world (which is a bit like someone boasting that they are the tallest dwarf in the world since the vast majority of people were illiterate but oh well, big fish small pond and all that.) The masses were also mostly, if not entirely ignorant of the rules, laws, and intricacies of what was taken for international relations in those days. Which is not to say that the system didn’t suck even when it worked, which it often did not. A system of international relations based on the use of betrothal to prevent unwanted wars resulted in a leadership consisting almost entirely of scrofulous n’er do wells chiefly concerned with gambling, the collection or ornamental Pumphreys and the avoidance of serious venereal infections.Asia had avoided this trap -- at least in part -- by shutting itself off from the rest of the world whilst the Americas had managed to mirror Asiatic isolation as well (albeit by accident. At any rate the luxury of living in a very large, sparsely populated continent inoculated the New world from the worst effects of demagogic inbreeding. For a time. Because alas, the accident of European hegemony allowed the system to spread across the globe like butter in a hot pan. And with predictable results.Everywhere one looked one saw war, misery and death. (See my book on Global Crisis for more details.)The system had to go. The revolutions of the 18th and 19th centuries were inevitable if not – at the time – entirely predictable. The issue was what to replace it with? The idea of letting the masses make decisions was toyed with by several facially hirsute philosophers but mostly rejected by those actually in charge of running things. They had of course read their Plato and understood his ship of fools analogy all too well. It was time for another compromise. They opted to establish a limited franchise empowered to elect representatives, a sort of proto-democracy in much the same way that mercantilism had been a rough precursor to capitalism.The representatives elected to high office were expected to ‘really know their onions,’ but as before, contradictions remained. Corruption and favoritism was rife and although the system evolved over time — as the Hegelian Dialectic insisted it must — there was always the sense that there was something not quite right about it. The franchise expanded, buckled and ultimately became ubiquitous. Today of the 195 countries assessed, by Freedom House 87 (45 percent) were rated Free, 59 (30 percent) Partly Free, and 49 (25 percent) Not Free.From an historical perspective, that’s pretty good. Not great, but OK.The modern-day philosopher Kings were not expected to go through the regimen prescribed by Plato, although elements of his thinking remained. Military service whilst not compulsory is generally seen as a positive attribute – especially in the US – and there is still in most countries – with parts of the USA being a fairly obvious exception -- an expectation that a degree of academic competence is something of a perquisite.Here in the UK a 1st class degree in Politics Philosophy and Economics – generally shortened to PPE -- from Oxford or Cambridge is about as close as one to get to being fast tracked into the halls of power. (Aside from being born into privilege and enjoying a guaranteed seat in the undemocratic House of Lords that is, but that’s a discussion for another time.)The system put in place worked.Sort of.The perception that politicians get nothing done is an aspect of an all too human predilection to whine about things that we should probably be thankful for.Anyone who has taken the time to read Orwellian classics such as the Road to Wigan Pier or fictional warnings such as 1984 or Animal Farm will probably have noted two things. First, that things are not as bad as they were and second that things are not as bad as they could be.Artist’s impressionAs I write this I am eating a sandwich of my own devising. It is a secret sandwich that I intend to take to my grave and by that I do not mean that I wish to be buried with a sandwich. I mean that I refuse to tell anyone what is in it nor why exactly I think it’s so great. I only ever eat them when I’m alone.Delicious though it is, it also serves as a stark reminder to myself that I am living in a western democracy in the 21st century.Because it is fine. Considerably finer than the kind of fine things that Henry VIII ever got to sample. It represents the ability of a working-class lad such as myself to buy food of relatively high quality in sufficient quantities that I can experiment with and then perfect the culinary end product.That’s right. It’s perfect.And no, you can’t have any.The shipping lanes are open. Wars between great powers have not taken place since 1945. No Atomic weapon has been used since 1945 either and those two – frankly incredible – statements did not happen by accident. Educated men and women stepped forward and created a lasting peace. They engineered levels of prosperity that humanity had never experienced before. And again, it’s really important to emphasize that it was no accident.On the issue of Nuclear weapons alone we have deliberate efforts by multiple agencies have been put forward in order to curtail their use. The very first resolution adopted by the UN established a Commission to deal with problems related to the discovery of atomic energy. And it didn’t stop there. The NPT, PTBT, Salt I and Salt II and the not yet put into practice CTBT were supplemented by various treaties and initiatives such as the Nuclear Suppliers Group, the Missile Technology Control Regime, the Hague Code of Conduct against Ballistic Missile Proliferation, and the Wassenaar Arrangement. And if you are wondering what all these acronyms and treaties mean then kudos – you proved my point! It’s specialized knowledge, so unless you are on some kind of nuclear energy committee, teach/write or study International relations or in some way need to know such information then it’s OK if you don’t. (Though it is better if you have a passing familiarity with it since you are undoubtedly a voter.)I’d be willing to bet my pet Lizard that Donald Trump does not know what half of those organization are. And that’s a problem.The prosperity of the 20th century was not shared by all, although attempts to spread the wealth were made. Living in such prosperous times was no guarantee of success of course. Many people still live in poverty and human misery absolutely does exist and in great abundance.But the overall trend was a downwards one.Until 2007.You see, the problem with sounding so hideously upbeat is that the democratic experiment fell victim to the very things Plato warned it would. Politicians -- far from being forbidden to hold property – were allowed to quite openly enrich themselves. The idea that ‘most political careers end in failure ‘is no longer true. Upon losing the General election of 1945 Winston Churchill was surprised to find that he had nowhere to live and was – to put it mildly – broke. David Cameron after presiding over the disastrous Brexit campaign that looks set to cripple the otherwise robust UK economy went on to enjoy the kind of reading fees that make most of us wish he’d throw up a kidney and choke to death on it.He charges around £2000 ($2630) a minute for those of you who are wondering. Which must be lovely for him but less enjoyable for an audience forced to listen to the disingenuous caterwauling of a second-rate mind lamenting everyone’s inadequacies but his own. Of course, in order to get such speaking fees and open invitations to boards of directors, one has to get themselves elected to a prominent position in the first place and in order to do that… well, you all know the story of big money and politics. It’s a bit like Star Wars without the lightsabers.When added to the problems of sophistry – usually disseminated via news corps owned by rich white business men though more recently promulgated via Facebook thanks to Putin and co. – the whole system came close to collapse. The upward curve had been teetering since the 1990’s. As I have explained elsewhere, the existence of the Soviet Union acted as a break on how egregiously unfeeling the free market and capitalism was allowed to get. Politics is after all synonymous with property – just ask Proudhon – and instances where living standards dip below a certain level generally produce predictable ‘let them eat cake’ type results.Yes, dates etched in our minds like 1776 and 1789 serve as examples of zenithal moments in human history but so too do the likes of 1917. You do not have to be a fan of Marxism to accept that it painted a pretty picture; and it was fear that the masses would decide that they might as well try a system that promised to improve their lives than live in one that demonstrably kept them in drudgery that paved the way for the social improvements of the 20th century.Which brings me back to my sandwich. It’s low in calories too.Did I mention that?Since we’re taking a look at zenithal moments let’s not ignore the last one. The summer of 1990 saw the house of cards that was the Soviet Union begin to collapse. By 1991, the reality of what had happened had sunk in. Capitalism had won. Fascism – long discredited by the actions of the Nazis – had remained on the fringe of political society and as such was no real contender. The realization that Marxism had failed – and increasing evidence that it had never really worked anyway – was like a tonic to those who had long argued that the system was no good. They could barely contain their excitement.See my book on The End of History for more details of said jubilations.Liberals began to cling to the center ground for fear of upsetting their corporate sponsors. Conservatives no longer feared the specter of communism and in response to the centrist positions of liberals began to drift right. Supra national organizations were created and/or expanded and we set about reversing the gains of the past few decades. Wealth poured out of the pockets of ordinary people as the powers that be forgot that the basic economic calculations remained unchanged. The falcon could no longer hear the falconer, to paraphrase Yeats; Things fall apart; the center cannot hold.The unchecked greed that led to 2007 had few consequences for those who had engineered the whole fiasco. Some people resigned of course and slunk off to private islands to enjoy multimillion-dollar severances; one or two faced some not so serious jail time.Meanwhile we were busy being distracted by Instagram pictures such as this oneWhy are these apples so shiny?The cost of the crash was born by the majority. Living standards that had been stagnating during the party nosedived during the hangover. The real estate industry dovetailed and like a Boeing 747 that has lost the use of all four engines, it went into the ground like a fucking dart.Sophistry was in full force as the ‘recovery’ took hold.“Look at the jobs statistics!” we were told. “Look at the coal miners; we retrained them and 90 percent of them are back in work!”Slow clap for Obama, for the Bushes, for Clinton.A closer look would have revealed that the coal miners lost $72,000 jobs and were retrained for $45,000 jobs. Deregulation was permitting pharmaceutical companies to lie without fear of later lawsuit about how addictive opiate medication is and to aggressively push their use in the general population to the point where the abuse of opioids kills 140 American a day.And we though cigarettes were bad!They created a world in which the national minimum wage is equal to almost exactly half of what a person needs to have economic security. We were better off than the peasants of old, no question about it but were we better off than we had been? The power elite took to watching our every move, quietly installing cameras on every street corner, passing legislation that allowed them to read our emails without our consent and rescinding civil rights in the name of national security. They moved from coddling us to policing us in just a few short decades and they were right to do so. They could not continue to take so much and leave so little for the rest of us without consequence. They saw the link between socio- economic distress and violent revolution. They had read their Marx and their Goldstone.But within the framework of a political system dominated by vested interests, they were powerless to do anything about it. The vested interests themselves were acting according to rational human drives and motivations but only as seen from their own perspective; as a collective they were essentially attempting to shave their balls whilst riding a rollercoaster or… maybe they were trying to shave each other’s balls… OK imagine a runaway train with four men on board each of whom is holding a scythe…Scratch that analogy it’s far too graphic for this time of day.It’s more like a villager chopping down a tree up on a hill because he wants to re-roof his house. Nobody could, in good conscience, describe his motivations as reckless, or even that he was behaving in a selfish way. Certainly, he is acting out of self-interest but hey, the rain gets in and he’s got a family to feed!“As do we,” the other villages might point out mere seconds before their lives were cut short by a sudden and catastrophic mud slide that destroys the entire village and everyone in it.I really wish I’d gone with that analogy first…The rational actions of individuals were catastrophically irrational when taken as a whole, leading as they did to an economic crash that they refused to take responsibility for (even if they were willing to admit in private that they were most certainly culpable.) The net effect was twofold.People got poorer and faith in the political class hit rock bottom. Thanks to Duverger’s law, political fortunes switched back and forth between a predictable dichotomy. A right-wing government subsisting on the idiot xenophobia and moribund social conservative ideas of the past pursued a ruthlessly corporate agenda that helped accelerate the transfer of wealth. The mood of the country flipped and a centrist government would take over.Hurray!Alas, in order to not anger their corporate sponsors -- who were busily consolidating their power by buying up media outlets – they refused to undo the damage done to the socioeconomic wellbeing of the nation by the right and instead focused their attention on meaningless culture war garbage that had nothing to do with anything. They threw the peasants a few crumbs of course and as the right drifted further right even the crumbs – such as the piss-weak corporate compromise that is Obamacare – became intolerable. The left moved right, the right moved right too and nobody seemed willing to point out that everything was going circles.The right began to bump up against the outhouse latrine that people had steered clear of since 1945 and met their natural allies, the fascists. The ideological bum buddies sniffed each other for a while and spontaneously agreed to rebadge themselves as the ‘Alt-Right’ a sort of cease-fire between the hard-right’s mostly non-racist fascists and actual Nazis. The post war aversion to all things fascist disintegrated like tissue paper in a hot cup of piss. Less than 60 years after the holocaust people had learned to both forgive and forget.Enter the maverick.Enter Trump with his ‘gaze as blank and pitiless as the sun,’ that ‘rough beast, its hour come around at last.’People often ask me why I was so convinced that Trump was going to win when all the poll numbers indicated otherwise. My answer now is the same as it was back then.The Rust Belt.I still have my sandwich. Well actually I’m quietly digesting it right now but the principle remains the same. There are people in the world who are hungry right now. I don’t feel guilt exactly but I know that it’s a problem and I know that I could do more to help them if I really tried to. Still, the fact remains that if I were forced via economic circumstances to rationalize my lunch into a half sandwich for economic purposes I’d be somewhat vexed.How selfish am I?The answer is that I’m probably no more selfish than most people really. Anyone who thinks that they can separate politics from human psychology is a person that I want to sit down and have a stern talk with.Statistics paint frightening realities about who has it good and who has it not so good in the USA and if you set yourself the task of indulging in some Rawlsian thought experiments for a few moments then you’d realize that given the choice you wouldn’t pick being an Black woman over pretty much any other demographic. Not to be in anyway unkind to Black women of course; anyone who read my love letter to Michelle Obama will know that like her I think Black ‘girls’ rock.But they also belong to a subset of a demographic that is much beset with difficulties.African Americans have the lowest median income in America, perhaps in part because nationwide, black students graduated at a rate of only 69 percent compared to Hispanics at 73 and whites at a rate of 86 percent. Not to mention that Black women are almost three times as likely to experience death as a result of DV/IPV than White women or that Black women make up just 8 percent of the population yet 22% of homicides that result from DV/IPV happen to Black Women, making it one of the leading causes of death for Black women ages 15 to 35.So yes, White privilege is a thing and so is male privilege.But that isn’t to say that White people don’t suffer or indeed that they necessarily possess the intellectual and moral capacity to count their blessings and act only out of a sense of muted guilt when it comes to the complaints they do have.Human beings don’t work like that.Real people in a position of unquestioned societal privilege are more than capable of becoming embittered and bewildered when things just don’t seem to be going their way. Whilst Bill Maher surrounds himself with privileged liberals that repeatedly ask questions about what was so great about coal jobs, those of us who take time to look outside the bubble have less time to equivocate. How many of us would like to get fired and then retrained into a job that pays half as much?Any takers?Thought not.Obama invested some $14 million dollars – which is nothing short of a pittance – on retraining people from failing industries and on paper the results looked impressive. Job reports were good! But few people were looking at what kind of jobs were being created. By 2015, 42% of Americans were not making enough money to have any real sense of economic security.And here’s the rub. The difference between earning $50 more than you need every month and $50 less is not as one might think a quantitative issue; it’s a qualitative one. It means doing without this or doing without that. It means payday loans and eating left overs until the next cheque. It means an old mattress that fucks up your back or days spent working whilst sick for fear of not making rent. These were the issues on my mind during the 2016 election and they led me to warn people that betting anything more than $100 on Clinton was probably a bad idea. The GOP had long been the party of the wealthy but the Democratic party’s position at the center right of the political spectrum had given blue collar workers few ways to express their dismay about how things were going for them.They felt angry, they felt maligned and they wanted to lash out.Some of them — many of them — still had it OK. Like me, they missed the halcyon days of whole sandwiches washed down with a mug of the finest Assam tea that money could buy but they had a roof, they had a job, and they had a few luxuries. They also had memories of what they had lost. Had Obama earmarked $140 million for retraining heavy industry veterans then right now they’d be pulling in $80k a year working on solar farms. But that wouldn’t do. Tax cuts were needed and tax cuts were given. Lobbyists lobbied and for the most part got their way.The political class had failed us.Sure, as I stated around 3000 words ago, things weren’t really that bad but they were bad enough that people decided to turn their backs on the political class in the hope that someone would turn the clock back to a time when things were just a little bit rosier for them. After all, aside form the basic necessities of life such as food, shelter a flat screen TV (and a video game console that can render images in native 4K #xboxonex,) wealth was something of an abstract concept. It can only really be understood as a measure of expectation and expectation itself is intrinsically relativistic. A family earning $180,000 a year might be classed as Upper Middle Class but are they rich? As the Washington Post pointed out one such family had:“A mortgage and three kids, including one in day care and another in high school with plans to go to college… affluent enough for an annual family vacation but not enough for a boat or second home.”No second home? Holy shit!But it’s a valid observation. Their nice life is measured by other people’s nice lives and as the GOP plan to gut deductions for ­mortgage and student loan interest and state and local taxes they will have to watch their nice life degenerate. It will degenerate in something that is still really nice of course. Just less so. And come 2020, I’ll be factoring that into my predictions of who will win the election instead of relying solely on poll numbers.Some voted for Trump because they fell for his BS. They actually believed that he cared about them. Like fools, they saw something of themselves in Trump. Whilst the rest of us saw a fatuous gasbag wheezing out tired populist lies, others saw a straight-talking guy trying to do what was right for his country. For others, the fact that a Trump win was going to wipe the smile of so many of the liberal, educated, urbane hipster-doufases that they were convinced – rightly or wrongly -- looked down on them, was enough reason to vote for him anyway.Never underestimate the power of anticipatory Schadenfreude.Which takes us to the heart of the question. Is there liable to be a statistical bias that suggests a succession of presidents lacking political training might not be such a hot idea?The short answer is, just take a look at the oaf in the White House.The longer answer is that whilst there are undoubtedly men and women who not only aspire to the Presidency but would excel at the job given the opportunity, the harsh truth is that a disproportionate number of the best candidates will have spent much of their lives preparing for the role.The idea that there are levels of expertise for just about any profession you can think of aside from politics is patently absurd. Yes, everyone has an opinion when it comes to political action but that doesn’t mean that they know what they are talking about. Would it be a good thing if brain surgeons coming in from non-medical backgrounds became the new norm? Christ no, it would be a bloodbath and extreme example though that is it nevertheless underlines an important point. Plato was absolutely correct when it came to the concept of a Philosopher King.True I can see no practical way of creating a political class that was immune to corruption thanks to a prohibition on owning property. It might have been wishful thinking on Plato’s part too. What I do know is that the concept of training for a life in politics is an important first step in creating a fairer society. Yes, wealth inequality as measured by the Gin coefficient is on the rise and it’s going to get worse before it gets better. But that’s a function of a corrupt system and putting a man who looks like an overinflated Macy’s parade balloon of Fred from Scooby Doo in charge of the nukes isn’t going to change that anytime soon.For general musings or indeed if you want to contact me / yell at me, or ask for my phone number, you can reach me via Twitter.My analyses of seminal works of political philosophy for Macat can be found here on the Routledge portal.

These are the reasons why Trump supporters voted for him a second time, not necessarily for Trump himself, but for the following policies and accomplishments: [In alphabetical order (you might want to start with Racism, Morality, and COVID) ]ABORTION?: Deliberately killing an innocent human is murder. The number of chromosomes and the genome of a fetus (Latin for ‘baby’) living in a woman must be a human. S/he can not be ‘part of’ his or her mother because s/he is a distinct individual with his or her own unique blood type, finger prints, and may even be the completely opposite sex. Without love and care, a baby, after birth, can survive no better than s/he could beforehand.During the 81 wars and military conflicts since the War for Independence in the 1700’s to the recent conflict in Yemen, 2,852,901 Americans soldiers have died, but the number of American babies aborted since just 1970 is twenty-four times greater! Planned Parenthood alone kills 330,000 unborn babies a year and then sells their body parts for profit. If God is just, He will punish us for the murder of 48,000,000 of His children.In his first week as President, Trump reinstated and expanded the Mexico City Policy that blocks $9 billion in foreign aid being used for abortions and he stopped U.S. funding to the United Nations Population Fund, which promotes abortions. President Trump's PLGHA Policy requires U.S. global health funds recipients certify that they will not promote or perform abortions. Trump hosted 34 countries for a meeting on how to promote women's health and protect the lives of the unborn.At home, he announced, “I am for defunding Planned Parenthood as long as they are involved with abortion.” His Human Fetal Tissue Research Ethics Advisory Board issued recommendations on the ethics of fetal tissue research proposals and advised against funding 13 of the 14 proposals because of aborted babies would be used. America's foster care and adoption system has increased partnerships with faith-based organizations to care for children and preserve families.Trump became the first sitting president to give remarks in person at the annual March for Life in Washington, D.C. In his address he stated the eternal truth that every child is a sacred gift from God and reiterated his effort to defend the dignity and sanctity of every human life. Which president has been more pro-life than the one He has miraculously placed in power? If Jesus were Pro-Life, would He vote for Biden? Would you? (How are you doing with a logical rather than an emotional response?)ABUSE OF POWER?: Total Presidential pardons and sentence commutations: Carter: 566; Reagan: 406; HW Bush: 77; Clinton: 459; George W Bush: 200; Obama: 1,927; Trump: 26. Mueller came up empty in his Russia collusion probe. He wasted months and millions trying to find any dirt on Trump. Trump signed an Executive Order establishing new ethics commitments for all Executive branch appointees, putting in place a five-year lobbying ban and a permanent ban on lobbying for foreign governments, so that appointees would serve us instead of their own interests.ANIMAL RIGHTS?: Trump has made cruelty to animals a federal felony so that animal abusers face tougher consequences.ANTI-SEMITISM?: Trump moved the Israeli capital from Tel Aviv back to Jerusalem (as promised by so many previous US presidents). Prime Minister Netanyahu responded: “President Donald Trump, thank you for today’s historic decision to recognize Jerusalem as Israel’s capital. The Jewish people and the Jewish state will be forever grateful.” Trump signed an executive order that allows the government to withhold money from college campuses here in the USA deemed to be anti-Semitic and who fail to combat anti-Semitism. This is important. As Jeff Jacoby, a Jewish columnist at the Boston Globe explains: “This is a Christian country. It was founded by Christians and built on broad Christian principles. Threatening? Far from it. It is in precisely this Christian country that Jews have known the most peaceful, prosperous, and successful existence in their long history.” Aaron Zelman (a Jewish author and head of a civil rights organization) similarly declares: “Christian America is the best home our people have found in 2,000 years. . . . this remains the most tolerant, prosperous, and safest home we could be blessed with.” Dennis Prager, a Jewish national columnist and popular talkshow host, warns: “If America abandons its Judeo-Christian values basis and the central role of the Jewish and Christian Bibles (its Founders’ guiding text), we are all in big trouble, including, most especially, America’s non-Christians. Just ask the Jews of secular Europe.” Trump himself has Jewish grandchildren.BIAS?: Imagine that CNN had honestly and accurately reported then-candidate Biden’s close ties to foreign terrorists (Rashid Khalidi), domestic terrorists (William Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn), the mafia (Tony Rezko) or the true evils of Jeremiah Wright! Imagine if CNN had honestly and accurately covered the evils of Biden’s involvement in weaponizing the IRS to be used against political opponents, or his involvement in the running of guns to the Mexican cartels, or the truth about the murder of Ambassador Christopher Stevens and his involvement in the cover-up. Yet, can you think of anything good that fake news has ever said about Trump since the GOP primaries? No wonder he’s angry; wouldn’t you be also? Is it important to be balanced or better to simply believe everything that we watch on CNN and NBC? In 2007, the New York Times gave a discount to MoveOn.org for the ad hominem, anti-David Petraeus “General Betray Us”advertisement? Did they ever give a discount for any Republican ad?BLACK & HISPANIC EMPLOYEES?: Blacks and Hispanics benefited economically more than whites from the new measures Trump implemented. Median incomes for black households rose 7.9% and Hispanic households 7.1%, a faster rate than incomes for white households (5.7%).BUDGET?: Trump’s budget cut domestic spending by 5% ($2.7 trillion). Acting Office of Management and Budget Director Russ Vought pleaded, “It’s time for Congress to come to the table, work with the President, and rein in Washington’s spending addiction.” The Dept of Treasury reported a $182 billion surplus for April 2017 (2nd largest in history). It got better thereafter! He produced a budget that cut $54 billion from bloated federal bureaucracies, eliminate 50 programs, and more than 3,000 unnecessary federal jobs.CHRISTIAN?: Trump is a Scottish Presbyterian with no interest in occults, mysticism or exotic mythologies. Melania was raised as a Slovenian Roman Catholic. Trump grew up attending the First Presbyterian in Queens where he was confirmed, and Marble Collegiate Church where one of his sons was baptized. The others have been as well. Today, he and Melania prefer the church they got married in (The Episcopal Church of Bethesda by-the-Sea in Palm Beach). In D.C., they attended St. John's Episcopal Church when possible. Consider that when the President goes to church, it is extremely disruptive with the media and the Secret Service needing to check everything out. Fortunately, church is not the ‘meeting house’ but a group of believers and Trump encourages worship in the White House with a chaplain and a weekly 90 minute Bible Study (usually attended by 10 cabinet members, plus staff, led by Ralph Drollinger who reports that Trump, if he misses one week, “writes me back notes on my 8-page bible study print-outs.” In fact, a Bible from a wonderful revival in Scotland has passed down to Trump, a descendant of one of the evangelists. He keeps it in the White House. He has said that his favorite book is the Bible, followed by The Art of the Deal. Few presidents in the 20th-21st. century have had such a close adult relationship with a pastor as Trump did with Norman Vincent Peale. But is Trump Born Again? Is he authentic?On June 21, 2016 over 1000 Christian leaders from all over the U.S. gathered to ask Donald Trump tough specific questions in person. James Robison, Jerry Falwell Jr., Huckabee, Carson, and Franklin Graham addressed the crowd attesting to the authenticity and trustworthiness of Donald Trump. At the end, Trump received a standing ovation. Dr. James Dobson adds that Trump was saved fairly recently; he knows who led Trump to Christ (Pastor Paula White). "I believe he really made a commitment, but he's a baby Christian. We all need to be praying for him, especially if there's a possibility of him being our next chief executive officer. He doesn't know our language, he really doesn't, and he refers a lot to religion and not much to faith and belief.” Trump himself has admitted, “The office is so powerful that you need God even more because your decisions are no longer, ‘Gee I’m going to build a building in New York.’ These are questions of massive, life-and-death. There’s almost not a decision that you make when you’re sitting in this position that isn’t a really life-altering position. So God comes into it even more so.” Don’t we all sin? Yet, we can all get saved at any moment, at any age, although critics may continue bring up our past.Check Trump’s actions. His executive order prohibits the U.S. government from discriminating against Christians or punishing expressions of faith. Federal prosecutors have been directed to monitor and take action to correct state and local policies that discriminate against religious institutions and believers. His CARES Act made churches and religious nonprofits eligible for assistance like the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP). In addition, Trump ensured that large abortion providers like Planned Parenthood would not be eligible for coronavirus relief. The Depts of Agriculture, Education, Homeland Security, Veterans Affairs, Justice, Labor, Health & Human Services, Housing & Urban Development, plus the U.S. Agency for International Development leveled the playing field for faith-based organizations wishing to participate in grant programs or as contractors. The new rules eliminated two requirements placed on faith-based organizations that were not placed on secular organizations. The Depts of Education and Justice issued guidance on constitutionally protected prayer and religious expression in public elementary and secondary schools ensuring that prayer in schools is properly protected. Trump has been removing burdensome requirements that faith-based organizations (including foster care and adoption agencies) must accept same-sex marriages and profess gender identity, in order to be eligible to participate in grant programs. He also announced a coalition within the business community to protect religious freedom.Internationally, his Executive Order on Advancing International Religious Freedom recognized the promotion of international religious freedom as a moral and national security imperative. He set up a Special Adviser to the President on International Religious Freedom within the National Security Council authorized by the International Religious Freedom Act of 1998. Trump is the first president to dedicate a full-time staffer to this role on a permanent basis. His International Religious Freedom Alliance unites government leaders from like-minded nations to strategize ways to promote religious freedom and protect religious minorities around the world. Trump has placed targeted sanctions on Russian officials for their religious freedom violations and torture of Jehovah's Witnesses. He hosted a meeting during the U.N. General Assembly and gave a speech solely on the topic of religious freedom, providing $25 million to protect religious sites and relics around the world. This is the first time a U.S. president has hosted a meeting focused solely on religious freedom at the UN.Biden, on the other hand, went along with Obama’s declaration that the USA “is no longer a Christian nation.” Biden had no qualms about the cancelation of the 21st annual National Day of Prayer ceremony which had been supported by all our previous Vice Presidents. Then, on 9/25/09, Biden participated in an Islamic National Day of Prayer with over 50,000 Muslims. Biden also saw nothing wrong with sending $770,000,000 to support mosques in Egypt, Cyprus, etc.Trump fortunately reinstituded the National Day of Prayer and took us back to our roots and the warnings of our Founding Fathers: “No nation has ever existed or been governed without religion. Nor can be. The Christian religion is the best religion that has been given to man and I, as Chief Magistrate of this nation, am bound to give it the sanction of my example” (T. Jefferson). “We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion… Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” (Adams). "To the kindly influence of Christianity we owe that degree of civil freedom, and political and social happiness which mankind now enjoys. . . . Whenever the pillars of Christianity shall be overthrown, our present republican forms of government, and all blessings which flow from them, must fall with them.” (J. Morse)CONSUMER CONFIDENCE?: Trump achieved a 17-year-high in the consumer confidence index. In spite of COVID, confidence is still high and optimism still reigns and the recovery becomes ever more apparent. Trump did it once and it only took him three years. He can do it again. Biden never did it in 47 years.COVID-19 / SARS-CoV-2?: Before there were six cases in the USA, Trump jumped quickly to provide everything necessary to protect Americans regardless to how doing so might jeopardize his chance of reelection if the amazing economy he had made possible was destroyed. The Democrats, on the other hand, stalled for 3 months to let COVID get out of control by pursuing an obviously futile impeachment. Pelosi then sat on those impeachment papers for 28 days before sending them on to the Senate which shut down for 21 days leaving Trump to deal with Covid alone. When Trump closed travel to and from China, Chuck Schumer declared the action “racist”. DeBlasio, in March, said that everybody should ride the subways and go to Broadway. Twenty-eight days after the travel restriction, Nancy Pelosi, downplaying the severity of the virus, begged people to visit Chinatown in San Francisco, once again playing the race card. She then at the last hour of the stimulus package, added things that were pure politics and had nothing to do with the dire circumstances at hand.Why didn’t Biden during his Vice Presidency replenish the National Medical stockpile of masks after the H1N1 virus scare? What prevented all of these Democrat governors from ordering all the PPE and ventilators for emergency purposes during the last two years?Every day, every turn, every word, every breath since before he was elected, Trump has been attacked, mocked, accused, blamed and belittled by the socialists. Yet, he’s the guy that gets hospital ships readied in one week! He’s the guy that gets temporary hospitals with hundreds of beds built in three days! He’s the guy that gets industries to build ventilators and face masks inspite of regulations by agencies which move like sloths. He’s the guy that asks, “Why we aren’t using already existing drugs that may work on people who are dying; what the hell do we have to lose?” He’s the guy that shut down travel from China, when the liberals, the media, and the W.H.O. were screaming xenophobia and racist. Now, they are asking why didn't he react sooner?It has been revealed from ‘gain of function’ involving four inserts of HIV-1 gp 120 and HIV-1 Gag, plus Plasmodium falciparum, by technicians (using molecular tools which can only be done in a laboratory) that COVID-19 / SARS-CoV-2 had to have been manmade, with Harvard, Ft. Detrick, the US Army Research Institute of Infectious Disease, and at the Food and Drug Administration’s lab in Arkansas all involved. The SARS-CoV-2 has a strange furin polybasic cleavage site that its closest genetic relative, RaTG-13, does not have; four different amino acids have been inserted into the virus contributing to its infectivity and pathogenicity. These have never been detected in nature and could not have come straight from the bats. It was all funded by the CIA and USAID-EPT-PREDICT. The ‘gain of function’ aspect adding HSC-014 with SARS plus HIV and MERS was done at Univ. of North Carolina. When a 2014 US moratorium on biological weapons forced further research out of the USA. Fauchi (NIH) gave $3.7M to our communist enemy, the Laboratory of Special Pathogens and Biosafety, Wuhan Institute of Virology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, to finish it up! Laboratory materials, samples and equipment used were obtained from the US Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases. Then, in 2017, at George Washington Univ., Fauchi was recorded declaring that, “There will be a surprise outbreak” during Trump’s presidency. What made Fauchi so confident? Their hope was that by killing millions of citizens and ruining the economy, this plandemic would bring Trump down. In fact, in Nov.’19, the CDC advertised for quarantine managers. Not surprisingly, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation owns the the Pirbright Inst. which owns patent EP 3172319B1/EP 3172319A1 (US 20062577852). Check worldwide.espacenet.com. It was applied for on July 23, 2015. Patents are only good for a certain amount of time. So, the granting of this COVID-19 patent was delayed until November 20, 2019 just it was being released from China. These traitors are making huge amounts of money while successfully sabotaging our economy. Whether they can also bring Trump down will be decided by a hopefully educated electorate on November 3rd.DEFICIT & DEBT?: During Biden’s Vice Presidency, the national debt grew to a staggering $19 trillion, at a rate of $35 million/hour and $2 billion every 24 hours. The TOTAL debt accumulated by all the previous 43 US Presidents combined, from 1789 - 2008 was $6.3 trillion dollars. But the debt added during Biden’s Vice Presidency amounted to $6.5 trillion - in just one term! Overall, spending during Biden's Vice Presidency was 40% greater than tax revenue. As President, he would make everything ‘free’. During Trump’s attempts to balance the budget, the Democrats continued this irresponsible spending through their control of the House of Representatives.TRUMP’S record compared with BIDEN’S record1st. year deficit: $665B $1.4TTrump has added about $1.7 to the national debt and spending must come down. However, during Biden's Vice Presidency the US debt to GDP ratio increased by 40% from around 60% in 2009 to over 100% by the time he left office. But the Debt to GDP ratio under Trump had been declining! With his increasing GDP Trump has managed to decrease the debt to GDP ratio in the 2 years since the 2016 election.DISASTER?: Prophecies about Trump as he began his first term included: “This is Armageddon. It’s the end of the world.” (N. Pelosi, D-CA). “What has been sold as a job creator and wage booster will, of course, do little of either.” (C. Schumer, D-NY). Liberal economist-turned-columnist Paul Krugman guaranteed a “global recession, with no end in sight.” “10,000 people will die every year from tax reform if passed into law.” (L. Summers, Clinton economist). Think of how much more could have been accomplished for Americans if these corrupt politicians had worked with rather than against Trump!DISLIKED?: Yet, they chose to dislike Trump because: (1) he won’t tolerate the ‘good old boy’ method of ripping off taxpayers; (2) he won’t mince words but calls a spade a spade unencumbered by the financial shackles of those who have been bought off; (3) he is free from political ideology distrusting Republicans as much as Democrats; (4) he is keeping his promises as a statesman, rather than compromising as a politician; (5) his confidence is confused for arrogance politicians who never really solved problem.DIVISIVE?: Ought we blame Trump for the divisions we see in America? Did it begin before he became president when none of the Democrats showed up for his inauguration except for Clinton and Obama? What would have happened had Republicans not show up for Obama's inauguration because they lost? Or did it begin 19 minutes after Trump was inaugurated when the Washington Post declared the ‘IMPEACHMENT CAMPAIGN has STARTED'? Was that when Trump divided America? How about when Nancy Pelosi ripped up Trump's state of the union right in front of the world, showing complete disrespect for the President of the United States? Did that bring the country together? How about when Trump and Americans had to endure 3 years and over $30 million trying to prove that Trump only won because of Russian collusion, not because America voted him in. Bloomberg gave $27 million, Tom Steyer gave $17 million, George Soros gave $9 million and many others to Hillary expecting a return on their investment? Did that close the gap between the honest and dishonest? 90% of mainstream media are owned by big Democrat donors? Over the last 47 years, what did Joe Biden ever do for blacks or working class Americans? When the teacher said the electoral college had to be eliminated because Hillary lost, and a student offered reason it should stay, the teacher ripped him apart and gave the entire class a 5 hour test, stating it was because he dared to disagree with her. Is such divisiveness perpetuated by faculty in your schools? Have the Democrats ever once gotten behind Trump to make America the best it can be? Was it divisive to blame the cages which the left claimed Trump had built to put Illegal children in, were actually built during Biden’s Vice Presidency to put illegal children in? Was Trump divisive by commuted 10 people but Obama was not for commuted 1,715 inmates? Was Trump divisive for dealing with COVID-19 after 6 Americans had been infected, but not divisive when Biden as VP allowed the H1N1 - SWINE FLU to infect millions of Americans before declaring it a health emergency? Why is it the most homeless, the most crime, the most murders, the worst inner city schools, the most Antifa & BLM chaos and destruction are all in cities ‘run’ by Democrats, creating great division?ECONOMY?: Only 8% of Biden and his fellow cabinet members ever worked in private business! This helps to explain the incompetence of that administration. The economic recovery during Biden’s last seven years as vice president remains the worst in postwar American history! Biden was the only vice president in history to never see economic growth above 3 percent. Average gross domestic product (GDP) growth since the bottom of the recession in 2009 was barely above 2.1% per year which Biden considered the “new normal.” The average since 1949 is well above 4% per year during the previous 10 expansions. This result was not just bad, it was catastrophic.TRUMP COMPARED WITH BIDENGDP Growth: 4.1% 1.6%Best economic growth to start a year in four years (Imbert reports for CNBC)1st.Q GDP expanded by 3.2% (Bureau of Ec Analysis); Dow Jones poll of economists expect 2.5%1st. year deficit: $665 billion $1.4 trillionFood Stamps kept or given away: ? 10.7M (32%)Under Trump, over 700 companies have boosted wages, given bonuses and other benefits to their employees because of tax reform. The economy has achieved the longest positive job-growth streak on record. Companies have brought back over a TRILLION dollars from overseas because of the TCJA bill that Trump signed.EMPLOYMENT?: Because of Trump, the number of individuals in work increased by 2.2 million. The number of full-time, year-round workers increased by 1.2 million. Small business job creation broke a 45-year record. Note however that employment of White House staff was cut. 44 staff had been dedicated to Michelle; Melania does fine with five. In total, there are 140 fewer staffers. This saves tax payers $25.1 million!ENERGY?: Under Trump, America has become the “greatest energy superpower in the history of the world” surpassing both Russia and Saudi Arabia. We’re now the world leader in oil and natural gas production which has reached record highs. Coal exports reached their highest level in 5 years. Trump opened up federally owned land and offshore areas for exploration and production, approving permits for the crucial Dakota Access and Keystone XL pipelines. Biden claims he’d do likewise. So why didn’t he when he had the chance? Trump pulled America out of the fraudulent, ineffective, and one-sided Paris Climate Accord. Under Biden, the “Green New Deal” would be the most radical takeover of America’s economy ever contemplated. The ultimate goal is to eradicate all production of oil, coal, and natural gas in the United States—and millions of jobs along with it.EPA?: Under Trump, the carbon footprint of the USA has gone negative while Europe has increased further. He sent $100 million to clean the waters in Flint, MI. Trump signed the biggest wilderness protection & conservation bill in a decade and designated 375,000 acres as protected land. He also signed the Save our Seas Act which funds $10 million per year to clean tons of plastic & garbage from the ocean. Trump’s USDA committed $124 Million to rebuild rural water infrastructure. To keep things honest, Trump placed 66 new experts on three different EPA scientific committees to replace those with conflicts of interest, having received grants for serving on ‘independent' advisory boards.FARMERS?: Trump provided $12 billion in aid for farmers affected by unfair trade retaliation.FOREIGN AFFAIRS?: Trump has been protecting our sovereignty and restored our standing and respect in the world. He is known to be a loyal friend to friendly nations and won’t tolerate anti-Americanism. He withdrew from UNESCO which defends dictators and spreads anti-Americanism. He decertified the awful treaty with Iran. He withdrew the US from the hypocritical Paris Agreement on Climate Change and imposed a travel ban on the most likely terrorist countries. He ordered new sanctions on the dictatorship in Venezuela.Trump rescued over a dozen citizens imprisoned abroad and ignored by Biden. Trump signed the Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act into law, which affirms Hong Kong's semi-autonomous status and protects against Chinese government encroachment, which is a threat to Hong Kong's religious freedom.Amazingly, Trump convinced China to impose the toughest sanctions ever on North Korea.GAY?: Trump appointed five openly gay ambassadors, the most competent candidates for the job. He ordered Ric Grenell, his openly gay ambassador to Germany, to lead a global initiative to decriminalize homosexuality across the globe. HHS finalized its regulation that clarifies that discrimination on the basis of sex in section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act is to be interpreted under the plain meaning of the word. Therefore, it does not include "gender identity" or "termination of pregnancy" as previously set forth when Biden was vice president. Trump will not force physicians to participate in gender reassignment surgeries or abortions.GENEROUS?: Trump donates his entire salary to charities. Liz Crokin, an entertainment journalist paid to dig up dirt on celebrities, covered Trump for over a decade. She never heard anything negative about the man until he announced he was running for president. She found him to be one of the most generous celebrities in the world.In 1986, Trump financially prevented the foreclosure of Annabell Hill's family farm after her husband committed suicide. Trump took action after he saw Hill's pleas for help in news reports.In 1988, a commercial airline refused to fly Andrew Ten, a sick Orthodox Jewish child with a rare illness, across the country to get medical care because he had to travel with an elaborate life-support system. His grief-stricken parents contacted Trump for help and he didn't hesitate to send his own plane to take the child from Los Angeles to New York.In 1991, a scheduling mistake stranded 200 Desert Storm Marines returning to their families. When Trump got wind of this, he sent his plane to make two trips from North Carolina to Miami.In 1995, a motorist stopped to help Trump after the limo he was traveling in got a flat tire. Trump asked the good samaritan how he could repay him. The man suggested sending flowers to his wife. Trump sent a bouquet with a note that read: “We've paid off your mortgage.”In 1996, Trump filed a lawsuit against the city of Palm Beach which didn’t like his Mar-a-Lago resort club allowing in Jews and blacks. Abraham Foxman, Director of the Anti-Defamation League said that Trump would not tolerate discrimination and that his lawsuit had a trickle-down effect because other clubs followed Trumps lead and began admitting Jews and blacks.In 2000, Maury Povich interviewed a little girl named Megan who struggled with Brittle Bone Disease. Trump happened to be watching the show and gifted the little girl and her family with a very generous check.In 2008, after Jennifer Hudson's family members were tragically murdered in Chicago , Trump put the Oscar-winning actress and her family up, under full security, at his Windy City hotel for free.In 2013, New York bus driver Darnell Barton spotted a woman close to the edge of a bridge staring at the traffic below as he drove by. He stopped the bus and saved her life by convincing her to not jump. Trump sent the hero a check simply because he believed his good deed deserved to be rewarded.In 2014, Trump gave $25,000 to Sgt. Andrew Tamoressi after he spent seven months in a Mexican jail for accidentally crossing the US-Mexico border. Vice President Biden couldn't even be bothered to make one phone call to assist with the United States Marine's release; however, Trump opened his pocketbook to help this serviceman get back on his feet.In 2016, Melissa Consin Young attended a Trump rally and tearfully thanked Trump for changing her life. She said she proudly stood on stage with Trump as Miss Wisconsin USA in 2005. However, years later she found herself struggling with an incurable illness and during her darkest days, she explained that she received a handwritten letter from Trump telling her “You are the bravest woman I know.” She said the opportunities that she got from Trump and his organizations ultimately provided her Mexican-American son with a full-ride to college. Donald Trump's kindness knows no bounds and his generosity has and continues to touch the lives of people from every sex, race, and religion. When Trump sees someone in need, he wants to help. Any stories like this about Biden?GUNS?: Gun control isn’t about guns; it’s about control. The 2nd Amendment protects the rest in case the politicians ignore our inalienable rights. Trump understands that free people do not ask permission to bear arms; a citizen is armed, a subject or slave is not. As Jefferson observed, “Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not.” The War for Independence would never have happened with gun control. Only a government that is afraid of its citizens tries to control them and “Those who trade liberty for security have neither (John Adams). You only keep those rights which you are willing to fight for. Know guns, know peace, know safety (no guns, no peace, no safety). You don’t shoot to kill; you shoot to stay alive. Yet, 64,999,987 firearms killed no one yesterday. Banning guns because criminals have too many is like castrating yourself because your neighbor has lots of kids - Clint Eastwood.HEALTH REFORM?: During the 3-1/2 years of World War II that started with the Japanese bombing of Pearl Harbor in December 1941 and ended with the Surrender of Germany and Japan in 1945, the U.S. produced 22 aircraft carriers, 8 battleships, 48 cruisers, 349 destroyers, 420 destroyer escorts, 203 submarines, 34 million tons of merchant ships, 100,000 fighter aircraft, 98,000 bombers, 24,000 transport aircraft, 58,000 training aircraft, 93,000 tanks, 257,000 artillery pieces, 105,000 mortars, 3,000,000 machine guns, and 2,500,000 military trucks. We put 16.1 million men in uniform in the various armed services, invaded Africa, invaded Sicily and Italy, won the battle for the Atlantic, planned and executed D-Day, marched across the Pacific and Europe, developed the atomic bomb and ultimately conquered Japan and Germany. During this same amount of time, Biden as Vice President couldn't build a functioning health-insurance website!The health care program Biden was involved in included 21 new taxes which further suppressed middle-class income, slowing economic growth. The health care program Biden approved of also forced employers to provide health insurance to all full-time workers or pay a fine, which could be as high as $3,000 per employee, and penalized taxpayers for choosing not to buy health insurance. All this added to the cost of labor, which again had the effect of slowing growth. Consequently, full-time employees were replace with part-timers.So, Trump eliminated Biden’s government-controlled health-care system and forced the largest year-over-year drop in drug prices ever recorded. He also repealing Biden’s Independent Payment Advisory Board, also known as the “death panels.”Just one hundred days after Trump was elected, there were 60% fewer drug price increases, and 54% more price decreases! At least 15 manufacturers committed to lowering drug prices. Trump enacted changes to the Medicare 340B program, saving seniors an estimated $320 million on drugs in one year. The drug aspect had cost Americans 180% of what the Europeans, the Canadians, and the Japanese were paying. Big Pharma was making all their profit here in the United States so they could give sweetheart deals to other countries. The single largest decline in drug prices in 46 years just took place as the FDA approved a record number of generic drugs as alternatives to expensive brand-name medicines. Customers saved a staggering $26 billion. Pushed by Trump, the FDA set a new record for generic drug approvals in 2017, saving consumers nearly $9 billion.Trump extend and expand price transparency throughout health care. Hospitals, insurance companies, and drug companies are now required to disclose real prices to patients. Such competition will drive costs down. His executive order forces all healthcare providers to disclose the cost of their services so that Americans can comparison shop and know how much less providers charge insurance companies. He believes that Americans should never be blindsided by bills for medical services they never agreed to in advance. Trump also made it possible for more employers to form Association Health Plans joining together to affordably provide health insurance to their employees.Trump’s Right to Try lets those who are terminally-ill try treatments that might not normally be legal. It gives these patients a chance to live, the least that can be done when individuals have already been dealt a bad hand. He signed the most comprehensive childhood cancer legislation ever into law. Trump is now providing HIV prevention drugs for free to 200,000 uninsured patients per year for 11 years. He provided nearly $60.7 million for Lupus specific research and education programs.Trump invested more than $1 billion to improve access to health care for 2.5 million people in rural communities across 41 states. He is committed to lowering the cost of healthcare while protecting patients with preexisting conditions.HEMP?: Trump signed a bill making CBD and Hemp legal.HONEST?: During the past four years, Trump fulfilled almost all the promises he made during the primaries, even though he has been attacked and resisted by half the government. This is unheard of! After 47 years, Biden is still running on promises made but never kept. Can you think of just one achievement which Biden can offer? Is plain, pointed but honest speech preferable to polished lies and deception? Some equate Trump to a doctor with a horrible bed-side manner who scolds, “Stop smoking and lose 100 lbs.!” Offended and angry, you come up with 10 reasons why he’s crazy. Eventually, you realize that he’s the only one telling you the truth.HUMAN RIGHTS?: Trump declared a national emergency related to “serious human rights abuse and corruption around the world.” He then imposed sanctions on 13 criminals at large. Trump established the Global Magnitsky Act and the Anti-Trafficking Coordination Team (ACTeam) initiative. Consequently, Federal law enforcement more than doubled the convictions of human traffickers and increased the number of defendants charged by 75% in ACTeam districts. Trump’s Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s Homeland Security Investigations arrested 1,588 criminals associated with Human Trafficking. Trump’s Department of Health and Human Services provided funding to support the National Human Trafficking Hotline to identify perpetrators and give victims the help they need. Trump’s DOJ provided grants to organizations that support human trafficking victims.IMMIGRANTS (ILLEGAL)?: Hypocrites Clinton, Obama, Shumer, Biden, and other Democratic leaders repeatedly endorsed building a wall until Trump was elected and committed to doing so. Securing the border is paying off and making our country safer. Trump struck new agreements with Mexico and Central American countries stopping the flood and caravans funded by Soros. The result was 70% fewer apprehensions (lowest in 17 years)! ICE Director Thomas Homan, stated, "the President has done more for border security and public safety than any of the six Presidents I’ve worked for!” Trump is responsible for the hiring of 10,000 Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers and agents, and 5,000 more border patrol agents. He also established a Victims of Immigration Crime Engagement (VOICE) office to help those abused by illegal immigrants. We send our troops to defend the borders of foreign countries, but the Democrats won’t defend our own borders! The New York Post reported, “Truth is, the Democrats aren’t leveling with the public about the billions we are already forced to spend on shelters, food, diapers, medical care and child care for migrants sneaking across the border and claiming asylum.” If the gov’t was willing to spend $6 billion on 3,000 miles of walls to protect homeowners from traffic noise, why not $5 billion along the southern border to protect our lives?IMMIGRANTS (LEGAL) EMPLOYEES?: Median incomes for foreign-born workers grew at a greater rate (8.5 percent) than those for native-born Americans (6.2 percent). He is ending ‘chain migration’ where an individual approved can bring along dozens of family members. He withdrew from the U.N. Global Compact on Migration which was a threat to our borders He intends to reward those who enter legally.IMMORAL?: How do we assess the character of anyone outside of how one’s actions affect others? Ought we devalue policies which benefit millions of people, here at home and throughout the world if we dislike the person? When it comes to morality, talk is cheap; actions speak louder than words. Jesus said you would know His followers by their fruit (Mt 7:20). We’re to judge the tree by its fruit.Trump doesn’t drink, smoke, use drugs, or gamble for recreation. Neither does anyone in his family. He hasn’t ordered a 18-year-old female staffer to fellate a senior aide in the White House swimming pool, or exposed himself to staff, or had oral sex with a young female subordinate in the West Wing. Instead, Trump repealed the transgender public school bathroom mandate and regulations that prevented drug testing for unemployment compensation (instituted during Biden’s Vice Presidency).Sure, Trump lacks decorum, dignity, and statesmanship. He is not a politician afraid of offending someone. His only special interest group are American citizens. He calls things like he sees them. Should it matter to you if a fireman drops an "f-bomb" while he's pulling you from a burning building? Would you really care about what came out of his mouth in those moments? Heck no! You, like me, would care about what he was doing. He wasn't sent there to save your soul and you’re not looking to him for spiritual guidance. All you’re thinking in those moments is, "Thank you, Jesus, for sending the fireman!”Ulysses Grant was a crude, vulgar drunk but Lincoln realized that, “I cannot spare this man. He fights.” General Patton wasn’t any better but President Roosevelt needed him. During WWII, Winston Churchill was hated by Parliament whom he taunted and ridiculed. London was bombed every night. Churchill got the things done that were necessary to stop Hitler and comfort the people of Great Britain.Today, Trump, who attended the NY Military Academy, performed in WWE wrestling events, and is in the Professional Wrestling Hall of Fame, yells, “You magnificent bastards, I read your book!” He’s defeating the Left using their own tactics from Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals, destroying HAMAS and ISIS (which Biden said would be around for generations”), battling Antifa, targeting MS13 gangs, forcing China to be honest, getting out of the nuclear deal with Iran, killing Soleimani, and fighting fake news.The days of America being taken advantage of are over. Trump was courageous enough to be the first US President or foreign leader to dine in China’s Forbidden City since the founding of modern China. His meeting in Singapore with the North Korean leader Kim Jong-un shocked the world.Occasional crude language, intemperate tweets, locker-room language, and personal flaws like adultery (reminders of King David) ought not be excused; Biden committed adultery with the wife of another man to whom he is presently married. But personal flaws also ought not distract from how he has blessed so many people who were suffering or in danger. Trump, resisted by the Democrat controlled House of Representatives, nevertheless has managed to pass more legislation to bless us all in his first 100 days than any President since Truman.We are not voting for a minister. Trump is no saint. A vote for Trump is not an endorsement of all his sins but an acknowledgement that God picked him in 2016 to be another Samson when winning that election required a miracle! The GOP was against him. The DNP was against him. Even the media was against him. Sure, Trump has many flaws, but patriotism isn’t one of them.Biden will destroy America as we know it, undoing everything Trump has done. Biden’s deep state whispered to Trump, “You can not withstand the storm!” Trump whispered back, “I am the storm!!” So if you care about morality, vote Biblically as a way of loving your neighbor which makes not voting not an option.This nation can’t afford to have another 40 million evangelicals stay home! God always works through people. Will you let Him work through you this November 3rd? Trump gave up his billionaire lifestyle to be scorned, humiliated, ridiculed, and slandered in order to save this nation.INCOME?: No other President has brought as much wealth and prosperity to African-American, Asian-American, and Latino-American families. Paychecks rose by 3.3 percent between 2016 and 2017, the most in a decade.Real median income for American households increased 6.8 percent in 2019—a jump of almost $4,400 in one year!! “Real median income” takes inflation into account and represents the 50th percentile of American income. What happens to the income for the top 1% won’t move the median income number one bit. From 2009 to 2014, real median income fell overall. Note that now the median or average-income family has seen a gain of $5,003 since Trump came into office! Under George W. Bush, the household income gains were a little over $400, and during Biden’s Vice Presidency the gains (which took 8 years) were $1,043.Trump, in less than three years, created a three times larger gain! He can do it again. The benefits of this economic growth went to the vast majority of American households enabling minorities to find work at higher pay grades while lowering their taxes.JUSTICE?: Don’t you want justices who will uphold the US Constitution? Do you really want judges who, rather than interpret the law as written, would invent rulings according to their personal preferences? Trump has appointed 193 federal judges, including two Supreme Court justices and 51 federal appeals court judges who will follow the law and preserve our freedoms.Trump signed the groundbreaking First Step Act, enacting reforms to make our justice system fairer and help former inmates successfully return to society. Inequities in sentencing disproportionately harm Black Americans. Trump has been promoting second chance hiring to give former inmates the opportunity to live crime-free lives and find meaningful employment. He launched the new “Ready to Work Initiative” to help connect employers directly with former prisoners. He signed the 9/11 Victims Compensation Fund into law.LAW & ORDER?: Most all police organizations have endorsed Trump because they know that if he gets four more years, he’ll drain the swamp and finally put the socialist traitors and child traffickers away for life. Trump’s executive order increased penalties for crimes against police. He enhanced and updated the Project Safe Neighborhoods to help reduce violent crime. Have any law enforcement agencies endorsed Biden?The Wall Street Journal (1/30/20) admitted: “Democrats broke every standard of due process, transparency and fairness in their House investigation, making a mockery of their constitutional duty. They hid the identity of the original accuser, denying Republicans and the country the ability to judge his motives. They held secret depositions, barring more than three-quarters of House members, as well as the press and the American public. They called 18 witnesses, but blocked the president from calling any in his defense. The White House legal team was excluded from the proceedings—prohibited from cross-examining witnesses, denied the ability to introduce any evidence that spoke to the central question of the president’s focus on Ukrainian corruption. In the end, Democrats approved two articles of impeachment that failed to identify a crime.”Trump created a commission on child-trafficking. He put into place Operation Cross Country XI to combat human trafficking, rescuing 84 children and arresting 120 human traffickers.Trump is a strong advocate for your 2nd Amendment rights so that if the police can’t come to your assistance quickly enough, you can still defend those you love.Trump is upholding the immigration laws, ignored by Biden. He ended Biden’s “catch and release” of illegal immigrants. Trump has defunded 300 sanctuary cities that defy ICE and has added 100 more immigration judges.MALE CHAUVINIST?: Trump depended completely on a female campaign manager (Kellyanne Conway) for his 2016 election outcome when he didn’t stand a chance of willing. She became the first female campaign manager in the history of America to win a presidential campaign.Trump appointed Elaine Chao as Sec. of Transportation, Betsy DeVos as Sec. of Ed., Gina Haspel as Dir. of the CIA, and Jovita Carranza as Small Business Admin.Trump signed the Inspiring the Next Space Pioneers, Innovators, Researchers, and Explorers (INSPIRE) Women Act to encourage women to study science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM), pursue careers in aerospace, and further advance the nation's space science and exploration. Trump revived NASA and wants a woman to be the first to step foot on the moon in 2024.He gave the job of constructing the Trump Towers to Barbara Res making her the first woman in history to build a skyscraper. He established the Women In Entrepreneurship Act and prioritized women-owned businesses for some $500 million in SBA loans. He got Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau accept the United States-Canada Council for Advancement of Women Entrepreneurs and Business Leaders.Women’s unemployment reached its lowest rate in nearly 65 years, dropping to 3.6%. Trump’s economic policies which benefited all classes of Americans, benefited women more than men! Inflation-adjusted earnings for full-time, year-round workers increased by 2.1 percent for men, and 3.0 percent for women. Median incomes for women (7.8 percent) grew more than three times as fast as incomes for men (2.5 percent).That was possible because Trump increased the availability and affordability of child care for mothers, (even during nontraditional work hours and for mothers in school) with a one-time investment of $1 billion. He gave 12 weeks of paid parental leave for millions of federal workers. He increased by $2.4 billion funding for the Child Care and Development Fund which will bless low-income families. His Child and Dependent Care Tax Credit (CDCTC) provides a 20-35% tax credit for child care expenses ($3,000 per child & $6,000 per family), plus Flexible Spending Accounts so that mothers can set aside up to $5,000 in pre-tax dollars to use for child care.Trump implemented the Autism Collaboration, Accountability, Research, Education and Support Act (CARES) allocating $1.8 billion to help mothers with children suffering from autism spectrum disorder.He established the Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment Policy to empower women and girls to participate fully in and equally benefit from the development of their potential. This takes into account the biological differences between males and females and is supported by The Fairness in Women's Sports Act ensuring that only biologically female athletes are permitted to compete in female sports. By restricting male athletes, female athletes can once again have a fair shot at medals and scholarships. Biden would take this away from women! Trump is so pro-women that he has even required airports to provide spaces for breastfeeding moms.MANUFACTURING?: Biden said there were not going to be any more manufacturing jobs; almost 200,000 manufacturing jobs were lost because of his policies. Under Trump, the nation’s top manufacturers have experienced phenomenal growth with an average of 91.8 percent of manufacturers positive about their own firm, compared to an average of 68.6 percent during the last two years of Biden’s service as Vice President. For example, U.S. Steel is now spending $1 billion to upgrade its Mon Valley Works in order to keep the region’s last integrated steel mill operating for decades to come. A combined casting and rolling facility (the first of its kind at any American steel mill) and a cogeneration power plant will have reduced emissions and increased efficiency. During Biden’s Vice Presidency, the entire period from 2001 to 2016, the annualized rate of real GDP growth in the first half of the year averaged a dismal 1.9%.MENTALLY UNSTABLE?: Dr. Keith Abelow, psychiatrist, concludes that, “Donald Trump is stone cold sane. When a man acquires billions of dollars through complex real estate transactions, invests in many countries, goes on to phenomenal success in television and turns his name into a worldwide brand, it is very unlikely that he is mentally unstable. When the same man obviously enjoys the love and respect of his children and his wife, who seem to rely on him for support and guidance, it is extraordinarily unlikely that he is mentally unstable. When the same man walks into the political arena and deftly defeats 16 Republican opponents and then the Democratic heir-apparent to a two-term President’s administration, the odds of that man being mentally unstable become astonishingly thin. And when that very same man attracts to his team the kind of intellect and gravitas represented by Dr Ben Carson, Attorney General Jeff Sessions, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson and Secretary of Defense James Mattis, etc., he cannot be mentally deranged. Period.” The stock market doesn’t like instability. Investors, en masse, can take the measure of a man pretty darn well. The stock market sky-rocketed and is doing so again.NASA?: Jump started NASA and established a Space armed forces division.NATIVE AMERICANS?: Trump signed three bills to benefit Native people. One gives compensation to the Spokane tribe for loss of their lands in the mid-1900s, one funds Native language programs, and the third gives federal recognition to the Little Shell Tribe of Chippewa Indians in Montana.NATO?: After years of not paying their fair share, NATO Allies will have increased defense spending by $130 billion.OPIOD / DRUG EPIDEMIC?: Trump’s Stop Opioid Abuse and Reduce Drug Supply and Demand introduced new measures to keep dangerous drugs out the United States. He signed the INTERDICT Act into law, enhancing efforts to detect and intercept synthetic opioids. Under Trump, the nation’s deadly opioid epidemic slowed with a 5.1% drop in overdose deaths, with sharper declines in some of the most hard-hit states like OH (24%), KY (17%), WV (9%). U.S. Customs and Border Patrol seized enough fentanyl to kill over 50 million people from a truck that was trying to get past the wall; the biggest fentanyl drug bust in history.ICE HSI seized more than 980,000 pounds of narcotics in FY 2017, including 2,370 pounds of fentanyl and 6,967 pounds of heroin. ICE HSI dedicated nearly 630,000 investigative hours towards halting the illegal import of fentanyl. ICE HSI made 11,691 narcotics-related arrests in FY 2017. DOJ secured its first-ever indictments against Chinese fentanyl manufacturers. DOJ launched their Joint Criminal Opioid Darknet Enforcement (J-CODE) team, aimed at disrupting online illicit opioid sales.POLICING THE WORLD?: Trump resists the elite who get rich off never-ending wars. He believes that America should stay away from costly, endless foreign wars. “The job of our military is not to police the world… It is time for us to get out of these ridiculous Endless Wars, many of them tribal, and bring our soldiers home. We will fight where it is to our benefit, and only fight to win.” He achieved a permanent ceasefire between Turkey and Syria and oversaw a peace treaty in the Middle East between Israel and Arab nations.POVERTY RATE?: The poverty rate declined again in 2019 falling to its lowest rate (10.5 percent) since the federal government started keeping records in 1959. The poverty rates for blacks and Hispanics also fell to all-time lows. The poverty rate even declined for groups like single mothers and individuals with disabilities proving how the broad-based economic boom reduced inequality. This will only happen again if Trump is re-elected.PRAGMATIST?: Trump’s success comes from seeing a problem and understanding how it must be fixed. He doesn't see the problem as liberal or conservative, Republican or Democrat. That is a quality that should be admired and applauded, not condemned. Immigration, the economy, the manipulation of our currency by China isn't a political party issue. It’s a problem that threatens the very fabric and infrastructure of America.RACIST?: “We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population." (Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood, assisted by Bill Gates’ dad). Planned Parenthood of Greater New York told CNN, trying to temper this admission, ”It's not complicated. She championed birth control and she supported racist ideas.”Trump, on the other hand, received an award from Jesse Jackson for his lifetime record of hiring minorities. His Surgeon General is black. His Sec. of Housing & Urban Affairs is black. Lynne Patton, a black female executive for the Trump Organization, defended her boss in 2016 against claims that he was a racist and a bigot. She tearfully revealed how she's struggled with substance abuse and addiction for years. Instead of kicking her to the curb, she said the Trump Organization and his entire family loyally stood by her through immensely difficult times.Trump’s police-reform executive order, the First Step Act, released thousands of people from jail. Over 90% of those benefiting from this retroactive sentencing reductions in are Black Americans.He provided funding for states to better anticipate solutions for maternal complications. Presently, Black Americans suffer the most.He has promoted “opportunity zones” that incentivized private investment into marginalized communities.He increased federal funding to historically black colleges and universities by 17 percent — a total exceeding $100 million, more than any President in history. Trump received the Bipartisan Justice Award at a historically black college for his criminal justice reform accomplishments.Not surprisingly, after 3 yrs of delivering on his promises to the Blacks, their support for Trump had risen to 24 percent, according to one February poll. It had been 8%.During Biden's Vice Presidency, the administration removed a two-year Bush-administration program of $85 million to these black institutions. And the 1994 crime law, which Sen. Biden helped author incentivized local police departments to lock up as many blacks as possible, resulting in mass incarceration. He was also responsible for one of the most racially slanted sentencing policies on record in the 1986 crack law which disproportionately punishing African Americans while sparing whites. Nevertheless, if you don’t vote for him, “you ain’t black.” Meanwhile he can enjoy life knowing “some black woman is stocking my grocery shelves.”In contrast to the hypocritical Black Lives Matter, Trump supports black unborn babies, black police officers, black conservatives, and black store owners. All lives matter to him.REGULATORY REFORM?: Trump cut regulation by nearly 50% in 12 months! He rolled back nearly 8 regulations for every new one, saving American taxpayers more than $50 billion. In total, agencies issued 67 deregulatory actions while imposing only three new regulatory actions, a ratio of 22:1. Federal agencies also achieved $8.1 billion in lifetime net regulatory cost savings, the equivalent of $570 million per year.RELIGIOUS RIGHTS? Trump is the most positive president toward religious freedoms in a long time. He expanded enforcement of protections for medical workers with moral or faith-based objections to medical procedures such as abortion. His executive order protects other religious freedoms. Want to see them all go away?RESCUING?: Trump committed $42 million to his budget to expand support for victims of human trafficking and to boost investigations and prosecutions. ICE rescued or identified over 500 human trafficking victims and over 900 child exploitation victims in one year alone.RESTRAINT?: Foreign leaders across the world have treated the coronavirus as an opportunity for unprecedented power grabs. China and South Korea track their citizens digitally. Israel suspended some courts. Hungary’s executive seized emergency authorities. Elections were delayed. Domestically, governors banned children from going to school, banned people from going to church, and closed businesses for weeks and months at a time. Mask mandates were issued. Family gatherings were banned. Tracking of sick individuals was pushed. But not Trump. Ben Shapiro is voting for Trump after not having voted for him in 2016 because, “He’s resisted using the federal government to control everybody’s life during COVID. That’s a big thing. This is the biggest government power grab during my lifetime, and Trump refused to do it.” Trump also responded modestly to the BLM riots that destroyed the downtowns of cities across the country. Both of the previous two presidents were on the promise to move away from interventionist foreign policy. Both clearly failed. Obama launched an invasion of Libya, Yemen, Syria, and Somalia. Obama handed down to Trump more areas of conflict than he inherited from Bush. Trump has invaded no new countries and worked steadfastly to end the two-decade-long war in Afghanistan, under immense pushback from the military-industrial complex. Trump campaigned on pledges to improve the U.S. economy, nominate solid judges, reorient U.S. foreign policy by avoiding global interventions and taking on China, and fight on behalf of Americans who had been ill-served by the D.C. establishment. Voters are used to Republican candidates in particular forgetting their campaign promises. Trump hasn’t forgotten them. With tax reform, tax cuts, and unprecedented deregulation, the Trump administration helped oversee amazing economic improvements, including job and wage growth among all Americans. He has gotten hundreds of federal judges confirmed, including solid Supreme Court justices. One of those battles required amazing fortitude.RUSSIA?: Russia influenced the 2016 election after Hillary sold them 20% of all USA uranium deposits? Saudi Arabia funded 20% of Hillary’s campaign! Trump withdrew from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty because, “For far too long, Russia has violated the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty with impunity, covertly developing and fielding a prohibited missile system that poses a direct threat to our allies and troops abroad.”SAFETY FIRST?: When Biden left office, ISIS had made substantial progress achieving its stated goal of establishing a caliphate, boasting tens of thousands of fighters and territorial control over an area roughly the size of PA, from the gates of Damascus to the oil fields of Iraq. Mosul, Iraq's second-largest city, was occupied. Then, under Trump, they were soon all destroyed. Biden said they’d be a threat for generations but there was nothing to do about it.Trump oversaw the arrest and charge 4,000 MS-13 members, an 83% 1-year increase! He signed three executive orders aimed at cracking down on international criminal organizations. Trump elevated U.S. Cyber Command into a major war-fighting command. Trump enforced red lines against the use of chemical weapons in Syria.SAVING MONEY?: Trump took away 20 years of free vacations (the $2.1 billion to be paid for by taxpayers) which Biden’s running mate had arranged for during his retirement. It was for Obama, 24 members of his family, and his dog (with a dog-sitter). Obama is also going to have to repay the government $214 million for 692 days of vacation during his presidency which include no work but only eating, sleeping, golfing, and other entertainment while Michelle bought what she wanted using the Office of Discretionary Gifting Funds (which is supposed to be used only to buy presents for visiting dignitaries).Trump saved more money by denied the FBI a new building. He saved $700 million with F-35 renegotiations. It was costing $500B to handle illegal immigrants so Trump built the wall for $5.7B.Trump has called for a full audit of the Pentagon and its spending as well as audits of all executive branch agencies. Trump put in place a hiring freeze for Federal civilian employees to stop the further expansion of an already bloated government. He supports English as our official language and dropping the Spanish version of the White House website. Businesses, permitted to do likewise would halve their expenses in this area. Meanwhile, small businesses are now allowed to group together when buying insurance to get a better price.SCAMING THE SYSTEM?: During Biden's Vice Presidency, a scoundrel (if he doesn’t marry his girlfriend and uses his mom’s address to get mail) could get away with buying a 3-bedroom house and moving in, while renting it to his girlfriend. She and his two kids, thanks to Biden’s Section 8, would then receive $900/mo. for rent. Then, she could sign up for his healthcare program getting the scoundrel off the hook for paying for family insurance. Being a single mother, college is free. Under Biden, she could also gets $600/mo. for food stamps, a free cell phone, and free utilities! On separate income taxes, they would both claim head of household over one child to get a $2,000 credit. The girlfriend gets $1800 a month disability for having a "bad back" and never has to work again.This amounted to a free $75,000 a year ($21,600 disability + $10,800 free housing + $6,000 free healthcare + $6,000 free food + $4,800 free utilities + $6,000 Pell grant money + $12,000 college tuition + $8,800) for not marrying the scoundrel.Wonder why our country is $20 trillion in debt while half the population watches the other half work. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them, and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for, that is the beginning of the end of any nation.Trump brought this dishonesty to a screeching halt. Next on his agenda are hundreds of Congressmen. Nancy Pelosi will retire at $174,000 per year for life, plus another $223,500 for serving as Speaker of the House, plus an additional $193,400 for serving as Minority Leader. That's $803,700 every year for life (plus free medical which is not available to the taxpayers)! The average salary for a teacher is $40,065 and $38,000 for a soldier deployed in Afghanistan. Trump will bring back justice.SCHOOL CHOICE?: Trump is committed to school choice because the less privileged would benefit the most from being able to pick the schools they want to attend for safety and educational reasons. He has called on Congress to pass school choice legislation so that no child is trapped in a failing school because of his or her zip code. And the failing schools will be forced to improve. It’s a win-win situation. Trump increased funding for school choice by $42 million. Trump’s tax cuts which Biden promises to repeal, allow families to use 529 college savings plans for elementary and secondary education.SECURITY FIRST?: Trump is committed to strengthening our national defense. He increased the military budget (the greatest guarantor of world peace) and is securing our borders. Trump established the Space Force to oversee satellites, space stations, prevent interstellar warfare. The world's No. 1 terrorist leader, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, and General Qassem Soleimani won’t be killing any more Americans.SEX TRAFFICING?: Trump signed the “Allow States and Victims to Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act” (FOSTA), which includes the “Stop Enabling Sex Traffickers Act” (SESTA) which both give law enforcement and victims new tools to fight sex trafficking.STATES’ RIGHTS?: Trump signed two executive orders giving back about 2 million acres of land to the state of Utah by modifying executive orders implemented during Biden’s Vice Presidency. Trump reduced the federal government’s control of the Bear’s Ear National Monument to just 201,876 acres. He also reduced the Grand Staircase National Monument in Utah from nearly 1.9 million acres to about million.Trump also repealed the mandate implemented during Biden’s vice presidency that forced states to fund Planned Parenthood.STOCK MARKET?: Due to Trump’s policies, the Dow Jones Industrial Average had its best year in its 121-year history creating $5 trillion in new wealth for those who bought stock. It reached the highest levels in history and will come back after COVID to surge to new heights, breaking all records, and making the middle class wealthier than ever.Consider that the Dow broke the record for the fastest 500, 1,000, 2,000, 3,000, 4,000, 5,000, 6,000 and 7,000 point increases between major milestones in the history of the Dow. During Trump’s first year in office, the DOW saw the most all-time stock market closing highs (71) as well as the largest increase in DOW history (4,956 points).SWAMP?: Trump has been attacked in every way possible including 55 assassination attempts and coups. The assault has not slowed because if Trump is reelected, he will finally take the offense and many of the traitors will be arrested, tried, and end up in prison or receive their deserved capital punishment.TAX REFORM?: Trump managed to passage the biggest tax overhaul in 30 years, with some $3.2 trillion in tax cuts along with significant simplification of the tax code. Child tax credit went from $1,000 to $2,000 per child! The Standard Deduction was nearly doubled! The average family of four earning $75,000 saved $2,000! Nearly 60% of the $5.5T tax savings went back to families! Business tax code made American businesses competitive world-wide. $500M in investments returned to the USA in 2018 alone. “Americans don’t just benefit from the lower taxes. They benefit a second time from higher wages generated by a faster-growing economy. Lower taxes for businesses and individuals help fuel more investment and innovation, which means more jobs and higher wages.” (A. Michel in The Daily Signal)TAX RETURN?: Nothing illegal or improper was found on Trump’s tax return. In point of fact, America does not need to see the tax return of a billionaire who became a public servant. America needs to see the tax returns of politicians who became millionaires while supposedly being public servants and lining their pockets!TRADE DEALS?: Trump imposed tariffs on China in response to its forced technology transfer, intellectual property theft, and its chronically abusive trade practices. As a result, Trump secured $250 billion in new trade and investment deals in China and $12 billion in Vietnam. As part of a historic “phase 1” deal, Beijing has agreed to structural reforms in its trade practices and to make substantial purchases of American agricultural products. Due to Trump’s tariffs on steel, aluminum, solar panels and washing machines, 11,000 new jobs have already created.Trump withdraw from the Trans-Pacific Partnership, got better deals in the North American Free Trade Agreement, and induced companies like Toyota, Mazda, Broadcom Limited, and Foxconn to come back to the USA and open new plants here.Trump agreed to work with the European Union towards zero tariffs, zero non-tariff barriers, and zero subsides. He finalized a revised trade agreement with South Korea, which includes provisions to increase American automobile exports. He negotiated an historic U.S.-Mexico-Canada Trade Agreement to replace NAFTA and negotiated a very favorable U.S.-Japan trade agreement. Trump’s USMCA was a huge win for U.S. workers, farmers, and manufacturers creating 176,000 new jobs.TRAINING?: Trump signed the first Perkins CTE reauthorization since 2006, authorizing more than $1 billion for states each year to fund vocational and career education programs. His executive orders expanded apprenticeship opportunities for students and workers. The Pledge to America’s Workers has resulted in employers committing to train more than 4 million Americans.TRAITOR?: During Biden’s vice presidency, almost $700 million dollars of taxpayer money was used to buy Russian helicopters (strengthening our enemy’s economy) for the Afghan Air Force (strengthening our enemy’s military). $338.3 billion went to illegal immigrants, and our other enemies like Hamas which received $351M; Libya $1.45B; Russia $380M; and Iraq $1.08B. When Trump sent supplies to help Puerto Rico recover, they were hidden in warehouses rather than distributed to those in need. These traitors hoped that the resulting suffering and deaths would make Trump look bad.TRANSPARENCY?: Trump forced the National Archives to made public more than 15,800 documents from its files on President John F. Kennedy’s assassination. Trump has ordered the "complete declassification" of documents exposing the evidence behind the Russia collusion hoax as well as Hillary's email scandal. Once released, these documents will prove that Biden and the FBI (under Comey) ran an illegal spying operation with Hillary Clinton to fraudulently smear President Trump with fictional accusations related to Russia.UNEMPLOYMENT / JOB GROWTH?: Unemployment was lower than ever before in our history and it will drop again! African-American unemployment was at the lowest level ever recorded. Hispanic-American unemployment was also at a historic low. For those without a high school diploma, the unemployment rate fell to its lowest level in nearly 3 decades. Jobless claims were at lowest level in nearly five decades.By June of their 3rd year: Trump v Biden as Vice PresidentJob Approval: 56% 45%.Unemployment rate: 3.6% (lowest in a generation) 9.4%For Asian-Americans 2.1% (lowest ever recorded)There were more job openings than unemployed workers, for the first time ever.Jobs added or lost: + 3.2M - 2.9MThis has been the longest streak of consecutive American job growth in history! Youth unemployment recently reached its lowest level in more than 50 years. Youth unemployment rate of 9.2 percent was the lowest since July 1966. Veterans’ unemployment hit its lowest level in nearly two decades. July 2018’s veterans’ unemployment rate of 3.0 percent matched the lowest rate since May 2001. Unemployment rate for Americans without a high school diploma recently reached a record low. Rate for disabled Americans recently hit a record low. Blue-collar jobs recently grew at the fastest rate in more than three decades. 68% reported receiving a pay increase in the past year. Once COVID is dealt with, Trump can do this again, which Biden in 47 years never could. He’s a politician and doesn’t understand business.VETERANS?: Trump recently signed the National Defense Authorization Act which included the biggest pay raise for our military in a decade. He established the Veterans Appeals Improvement and Modernization Act, the Veterans Educational Assistance Act, the VA Choice and Quality Employment Act, a VA hotline, an “Access and Quality Tool,” and tele-health technology. He created a White House VA Hotline to help veterans, principally staffed by veterans. VA employees are finally being held accountable for poor performance, with more than 4,000 VA employees removed, demoted, and suspended so far. Trump signed measure funding prevention programs for Veteran suicide. Trump gave his entire salary ($400,000) to repair military cemeteries!VICIOUSNESS?: Long before Johnny Depp, Peter Fonda, Kathy Griffin, Robert De Niro, Madonna, Snoop Dogg, and a host of celebrities were vying to fantasize how best to dispatch Trump (shooting? burning? decapitation? fisticuffs? explosives?), Garrison Keillor, Linda Ronstadt, Harold Pinter, George Soros, and other notables competed to find the proper fascist/Nazi simile for George Bush. Did the Republicans do likewise for Biden or Obama? Democratic National Committee chairman Howard Dean, blustered, “I hate the Republicans and everything they stand for” and “This is a struggle of good and evil. And we’re the good”? But did the Republican chairman sprue such vile comments? Senator Hillary Clinton (D-N.Y.) called America’s supreme battlefield commander a veritable liar in the middle of a war.Long before Trump became President, didn’t Al Gore libeled Bush’s Internet supporters as “digital brownshirts”? And John Glenn talked of Bush in terms of “It’s the old Hitler business”. Did Trump’s crassness cause Julian Bond to slander the Bush Administration with, “Their idea of equal rights is the American flag and the Confederate swastika flying side by side” or Senator Byrd, to compare the Bush Administration’s legislative efforts to those of the Third Reich? In spite of all of this slam dunking on Bush, he chose not to respond in kind, an example of welcomed and much needed magnanimity.But that only inspired the Democrats to become more unreasonable. I have Democrat friends who can’t even discuss coherently these issues with me.Did Trumps callousness prompt the 2008 campaign rhetoric of “typical white person,” “get in their face” and “If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun, because from what I understand folks in Philly like a good brawl.” Of course not!Should we hold Trump responsible for Obama’s taunt of “you didn’t build that,” and a call for Latinos to “punish our enemies”? Of course not! Whose administration encouraged David Letterman to joke of the statutory rape of Sarah Palin’s 14-year-old daughter who had attended a recent New York Yankees game: “One awkward moment for Sarah Palin at the Yankee game—during the seventh inning, her daughter was knocked up by Alex Rodriguez”? Was essayist Andrew Sullivan, anticipating years in advance Donald Trump’s birther fantasies, when he kept peddling the absurd “truther” conspiracy theory of Sarah Palin faking her own pregnancy?Before Trump was elected, Peter Strzok, the FBI investigator at the center of so many of the FBI’s investigations from 2015 through 2017, wrote off Trump supporters as hillbillies fouling the air of Walmart. For a CNN reporter, Trump’s supporters were toothless nobodies. There is an ample corpus of elite fantasies of swapping out Trump supporters for supposedly more industrious and morally superior immigrants.The point is not to excuse any of Trump’s coarser tweets, but to emphasize that the idea of Trump as the fons et origio of all calumny is absurd. As far as the vitriol that now regularly is heard from Representatives Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) and Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.), they are simply reflections of a long-standing left-wing viciousness against Israel and Jews, deeply embedded within elements of the Democratic Party. The ‘sudden’ debasement of political discourse and behavior can not be blamed on the Republicans!During Trump’s State of the Union address, none of the Democrat women dressed in white wore an American Flag lapel. They failed to stand and clap for an ICE agent who has saved hundreds of children from human trafficking. They failed to clap for a little girl who beat cancer. It was reminiscent of The League of Nazi Socialist Women who supported Hitler’s dream of a socialist paradise and always went to public events dressed in white (as did the KKK). Pelosi found nothing good in any of the improvements Trump made for our nation and ripped up her copy.WAGES?: Wages will again rise the fastest for low-income workers. CNBC reported, “The recent jump in paychecks has come with an unusual characteristic, as workers at the lower end of the pay scale are getting the greater benefit.” “Average hourly earnings rose 3.4 percent in February from the same period a year ago, according to a Bureau of Labor Statistics. That’s the biggest gain since April 2009 and the seventh month in a row that compensation has been 3 percent or better. It will happen again under Trump.WELFARE?: During Biden's Vice Presidency, the food stamp program expanded to the point where 1 in 5 American families receive food stamps and are beholding to the Federal Government. During Biden’s vice presidency, the federal work requirement for those receiving government money was illegally gutted. The Democrats want to consolidate dictatorial powers by legalize 12 million illegal Mexican immigrants making them beholding to Democrats for free health care, aid to dependent children, food stamps, free education, tax credits, and Social Security which would overwhelm the system and bankrupt America.TRUMP BIDEN while Vice PresidentFood Stamps kept or given away: ? 10.7M(32% increase from 33,490,000) according to the USDA)WHISTLE BLOWERS?: Trump’s Veterans Accountability and Whistleblower Protection Act allows senior officials in the Department of Veterans Affairs to fire failing employees and establish safeguards to protect whistleblowers.The ‘debates’ have been a waste of time. Above are the issues to wrestle with. Do I wish we lived in a time when our president could be “collegial” and “dignified” and “proper”? Of course I do. These aren’t those times. This is a war that socialists have been fighting without opposition for the past 50 years. So, say anything you want about this president - I get it - he can be vulgar, he can be crude, he can be undignified at times. But he fights for America and how can you not want to make your own country great?The failure of God’s redeemed people to vote and to be more involved in politics during the past century has led to our current looming crisis (Jud 9:8-15). Civil government is a divine institution of God that exists to protect the life, liberty, and property of its citizens, enabling them to more effectively advance the Kingdom of God in the earth. Civil leaders are servants of God and His people, His ministers for good (Rm 13:4; Lk 22:25-26). For this to occur, Christians must be involved in selecting good men to office. Select able men of truth who fear God and hate dishonest gain” (Exodus 18:21). “Choose wise, discerning and experienced men” (Deut 1:13). How does Biden conform to this criteria? The only way for evil to prevail is for good people to do nothing. It is inconceivable that God would ordain government and then ask His people to stay out of it. Politics is a form of discipleship, our involvement in which helps shape us into the image of Christ.Sure, politics is evil - just like you and me and everything in this fallen world. "None is righteous, no, not one.” All our choices - not just political ones - are corrupted. Yet, we are to overcome evil with good. Wise policies have brought freedom to tens of millions of oppressed peoples around the world. Wise policies have welcomed the "poor, huddled masses yearning to be free," ~ the right of people to live their lives and carry out their business without the threat of unlawful search and seizure. All of these came about only when good people got involved in politics and voted.Liberals considered Biden a success as Vice President, having achieved the highest poverty level in American history, the high national debt, a record numbers of mass shootings, and a record numbers of people on food stamps, plus the lowest economic growth in American history, all during 8 years of war. Do you want to go back to that? If Biden wins, we become a socialist nation like the Union of Soviet Socialist Republic, and the National Socialist Party (Nazi). It’s unlikely we’ll ever get our freedoms back then.