Read Carefully: This Is A Waiver And Release Of Liability: Fill & Download for Free

Hey Daniel!This is just vintage the Die Plebs Die callous and sociopathic administration’s M.O.- forget the 132,000 Americans who have perished because of it. And to their relatives left behind, well, here’s a giant knee in the nuts. United States Coronavirus: 3,005,356 Cases and 132,684 DeathsIt’s—once again— all about the fanatic cruelty. If this doesn’t tell you that Trump and the GOP don’t care about you, me and the rest of the American people, then nothing ever will.This is apparently their “new normal”- just let people die, don't be accountable for anything. Do not denounce the Russia bounty story. While you’re at it, ignore all the lies and, if possible, support Q-Anon, and don’t forget about the Confederate flag!Trump and his toady minions know that the virus will not “magically” go away by November — and are instead hoping to convince Americans they can simply “live with” the deadly disease that is spreading unchecked.President Jim Jones for dummies is intentionally making Americans sick. Forcing Tulsa rally attendees to pack into the front of the arena (to give the illusion of a full house). Zip-tying chairs together at the Mount Russiamore rally. In a very real and criminally culpable sense, he’s killing his supporters, and while he’s at it, the rest of us as well.But taking responsibility? Oh no, he never does! Why would he now?Here’s a fun fact: The disclaimer when registering for Trump's upcoming Portsmouth rally reads: “In attending the event, you and any guests, voluntarily assume all risks related to exposure to COVID-19, and waive, release, and discharge Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. ... from any and all liability.” Make America Great Again! Rally - Portsmouth, NHNo one should sign a DEATH WAIVER to attend one of Trump’s hate rallies. Having said that- if you want to die for Donald Trump, we can’t stop you. But we should be able to stop you from endangering hospital workers and taking up hospital beds.Good luck!!

Anthony Caputo asks the question:“Why do supporters of WA I-1639 think it will reduce crime when murders with rifles in WA historically have been in the single digits?”As I work in Washington (for the time being) but live in Oregon I was unfamiliar with this measure and went to do some research.HOLY CRAP!!!!!!!!!!!!!Here are some important details from the measure (no, this is not a direct copy of the entirety of the text, no I did not read all of it as I was losing my mind to the vacuous nature of the measure:In particular, shootings involving the use of semiautomatic assault rifles have resulted in hundreds of lives lost,The impacts of gun violence by assault weapons fall heavily on children and teenagers.Implementing an enhanced background check system for semiautomatic assault rifles that is as strong as the one required to purchase a handgun and requiring safety training and a waiting period will help ensure that we keep these weapons out of dangerous hands.ENHANCED BACKGROUND CHECKS. RCW 9.41.090 and 2018 c 201 s 6003 are each amended to read as follows:(1) In addition to the other requirements of this chapter, no dealer may deliver a pistol to the purchaser thereof until:(a) The purchaser produces a valid concealed pistol license and the dealer has recorded the purchaser's name, license number, and issuing agency, such record to be made in triplicate and processed as provided in subsection (((5))) (6) of this section. 9.41.070 at the time of issuance;(b) The dealer is notified in writing by (i) the chief of police or the sheriff of the jurisdiction in which the purchaser resides that the purchaser is eligible to possess a pistol under RCW 9.41.040 and that the application to purchase is approved by the chief of police or sheriff;(2) In addition to the other requirements of this chapter, no dealer may deliver a semiautomatic assault rifle to the purchaser thereof until:(a) The purchaser provides proof that he or she has completed a recognized firearm safety training program within the last five years that, at a minimum, includes instruction on:(i) Basic firearms safety rules;(ii) Firearms and children, including secure gun storage and talking to children about gun safety;(iii) Firearms and suicide prevention; (iv) Secure gun storage to prevent unauthorized access and use;(v) Safe handling of firearms; and(vi) State and federal firearms laws, including prohibited firearms transfers.The training must be sponsored by a federal, state, county, or municipal law enforcement agency, a college or university, a nationally recognized organization that customarily offers firearms training, or a firearms training school with instructors certified by a nationally recognized organization that customarily offers firearms training.The proof of training shall be in the form of a certification that states under the penalty of perjury the training included the minimum requirements;and (b) The dealer is notified in writing by (i) the chief of police or the sheriff of the jurisdiction in which the purchaser resides that the purchaser is eligible to possess a firearm under RCW 9.41.040 and that the application to purchase is approved by the chief of police or sheriff;or (ii) the state that the purchaser is 5 eligible to possess a firearm under RCW 9.41.040, as provided in subsection (3)(b) of this section; or (c) The requirements or time periods in RCW 9.41.092 have been satisfied. (3)(a) Except as provided in (b) of this subsection, in determining whether the purchaser meets the requirements of RCW 9.41.040, the chief of police or sheriff, or the designee of either, shall check with the national crime information center, including the national instant criminal background check system, provided for by the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act (18 U.S.C. Sec. 921 et seq.), the Washington state patrol electronic database, the health care authority electronic database, and with other agencies or resources as appropriate, to determine whether the applicant is ineligible under RCW 9.41.040 to possess a firearm.(b) The state, through the legislature or initiative process, may enact a statewide firearms background check system equivalent to, or more comprehensive than, the check required by (a) of this subsection to determine that a purchaser is eligible to possess a firearm under RCW 9.41.040.Once ((the)) a state system is established, a dealer shall use the state system and national instant criminal background check system, provided for by the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act (18 U.S.C. Sec. 921 et seq.), to make criminal background checks of applicants to purchase firearms.(((2))) (b) Ten business days have elapsed from the date the licensed dealer requested the background check. However, for sales and transfers of pistols if the purchaser or transferee does not 10 have a valid permanent Washington driver's license or state identification card or has not been a resident of the state for the previous consecutive ninety days, then the time period in this subsection shall be extended from ten business days to sixty days.(3) Every store, shop, or sales outlet where firearms are sold that is registered as a dealer in firearms with the department of licensing, upon the sale or transfer of a firearm, shall deliver a written warning to the purchaser or transferee that states, in block letters not less than one-fourth inch in height:WARNING: YOU MAY FACE CRIMINAL PROSECUTION IF YOU STORE OR LEAVE AN UNSECURED FIREARM WHERE A PERSON WHO IS PROHIBITED FROM POSSESSING FIREARMS CAN AND DOES OBTAIN POSSESSIONSec. 7. RCW 9.41.094 and 2018 c 201 s 6004 are each amended to read as follows: A signed application to purchase a pistol or semiautomatic assault rifle shall constitute a waiver of confidentiality and written request that the health care authority, mental health institutions, and other health care facilities release, to an inquiring court or law enforcement agency, information relevant to the applicant's eligibility to purchase a pistol or semiautomatic assault rifle to an inquiring court or law enforcement agency.Sec. 9. RCW 9.41.0975 and 2009 c 216 s 7 are each amended to read as follows: (1) The state, local governmental entities, any public or private agency, and the employees of any state or local governmental entity or public or private agency, acting in good faith, are immune from liability:(25) "Semiautomatic assault rifle" means any rifle which utilizes a portion of the energy of a firing cartridge to extract the fired cartridge case and chamber the next round, and which requires a separate pull of the trigger to fire each cartridge.[edited for readability and emphasis added]https://www.sos.wa.gov/_assets/elections/initiatives/finaltext_1531.pdfWow, what a steaming pile of infringement that is.So, for the laity who don’t get the gist of this:EVERY semi-automatic rifle in existence would be defined by this Washington Initiative as a “semiautomatic assault rifle”That includes this one:Don’t believe me? Here is the pertinent section of the measure again:(25) "Semiautomatic assault rifle" means any rifle which utilizes a portion of the energy of a firing cartridge to extract the fired cartridge case and chamber the next round, and which requires a separate pull of the trigger to fire each cartridge.Now, should this measure pass it is important to note that you have to give up your HIPPA rights so that the State can dig through your medical records.It is also important to note that the state can penalize you for the actions of others if someone gets their hands on your firearmsWARNING: YOU MAY FACE CRIMINAL PROSECUTION IF YOU STORE OR LEAVE AN UNSECURED FIREARM WHERE A PERSON WHO IS PROHIBITED FROM POSSESSING FIREARMS CAN AND DOES OBTAIN POSSESSION(24) "Secure gun storage" means: (a) A locked box, gun safe, or other secure locked storage space that is designed to prevent unauthorized use or discharge of a firearm; and (b) The act of keeping an unloaded firearm stored by such means.While the state exempts everyone who may have legal authority to stop someone:Sec. 9. RCW 9.41.0975 and 2009 c 216 s 7 are each amended to read as follows: (1) The state, local governmental entities, any public or private agency, and the employees of any state or local governmental entity or public or private agency, acting in good faith, are immune from liability:This essentially creates a two class system.Further, if you move into the state and find a nice new rifle you want to buy, you would now have to wait not 10 days, but SIXTY days.Honestly I’m not sure if I would want this measure to pass or not.Given the current makeup of the SCOTUS I’m 93% certain it would be struck down as unconstitutional.Then again, I don’t want the nose of the camel in the tent.It is measures like this that are continuing proof that the anti-freedom caucus of the American Political Left is hell-bent on a step-by-step disarmament of the citizenry and this kind of behavior must be stopped.I urge a NO!!!!!!!!!!!!! vote on WA I-1639Here is a nice summary from Ballotpedia:Washington Initiative 1639, Changes to Gun Ownership and Purchase Requirements Measure (2018) - Ballotpedia

As my credential says, “I’m not a lawyer.” Therefore, this is not legal advice. However . . .The document looks fairly good—certainly better than most people use—but I still see some weaknesses. See my comments.INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR RELEASE, WAIVER OF LIABILITY AND COVENANT NOT TO SUEI fully understand that I have agreed to provide services, as an independent contractor, for David Loricchio. As an independent contractor, I understand that I am responsible for all related income/self-employment taxes for fees received from David Loricchio for services provided.The IRS has various tests to determine whether someone’s an independent contractor. See this. Just stating that someone is an independent contractor. For instance, if you dictate a schedule, tell someone how to do the work, provide tools or materials, pay business or travel expenses, and so on, those all are factors that could suggest that the person is not an independent contractor.In addition, I acknowledge that I am solely responsible for any medical or other costs arising out of any bodily injury or property damage sustained while providing services as an independent contractor.This is good, but you can’t force people to give up their rights. And there are situations in which you could be found liable for unsafe conditions even when using an independent contractor. I’d also remove “as an independent contractor.” You’ve already had him agree that he’s one. This actually can work against you. If it’s determined, for some reason, that he’s not an independent contractor, then this clause makes it clear that you are responsible. It’s saying that he’s responsible only so long as he’s acting as an independent contractor.I certify that I have adequate insurance coverage, including health and accident, for any injuries I may sustain while providing said services.Again, good. But rather than just asking for the person to “certify” that, you should ask to see evidence of insurance coverage. At least ask for his/her insurance agent, contact information, and policy number to verify that there is insurance coverage. I’d also change “adequate” to something specific. “Adequate” can mean different things to different people.I further covenant and agree that I will not sue David Loricchio for any claim for damages, for bodily injury or other, arising while performing services for David Loricchio as an independent contractor.I’m not sure this is legal. Rather, you may be able to require arbitration as a first step, or in place of a law suit. I also don’t know what “bodily injury or other” means. Specifically, “or other.”I certify that I am _____ years of age and suffering under no legal disabilities and that I have read the above carefully before signing.Check your phrasing: “legal disabilities” isn’t correct. Also, instead of “have read the above carefully” change it to “have read the above carefully and understand it.” Just reading something doesn’t mean that the person understands the meaning.Again, I’d urge you to consult with a lawyer.