New York Forms And Documents: Fill & Download for Free

I never could; here’s why:What service-member or veteran could ever support a Commander in Chief who said this, under any circumstances?Would you accept this from your military or civilian supervisor? Would you ever tolerate hearing it from your child?Trump said it while the whole planet watched, on March 13th, 2020:2. Trump used his fake "Foundation" during his 2016 campaign to steal from our veterans and the people trying to support them; yes he did. And he got caught!Downloadable .pdf doc. of lawsuit: https://ag.ny.gov/sites/default/files/court_stamped_petition.pdf(See pages 11-13):"33. In 2016, the Board knowingly permitted the Foundation to be co-opted by Mr. Trump's presidential campaign, and thereby violated its certificate of incorporation and state and federal law by engaging in political activity and prohibited related party transactions.Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. (the "Campaign"), Mr. Trump's political committee, extensively directed and coordinated the Foundation's activities in connection with a nationally televised charity fundraiser for the Foundation in Des Moines, Iowa on January 28, 2016 (the "Iowa Fundraiser"), and the disbursements of the proceeds from the event.34. Candidate Trump decided to conduct the Iowa Fundraiser in lieu of participating in a televised debate of the Republican presidential candidates. The events took place less than one week before the February 1, 2016 Iowa caucuses.35. In a filing submitted to the Attorney General's Charities Bureau, signed by Mr. Trump as President of the Foundation and dated October 20, 2016, the Foundation asserted that it "held [the Iowa Fundraiser] to raise funds for veterans' organizations . . . [and that it] created a website to allow donors to make charitable contributions online." (2016 Form CHAR410-A, Part G, Line 3(c).)This statement was false because, in reality, the Fundraiser was a Trump Campaign event in which the Foundation participated.36. The Investigation revealed that the Iowa Fundraiser was planned, organized, financed, and directed by the Campaign, with administrative assistance from the Foundation. The event was billed as the "Donald J. Trump Special Event for Veterans," and the website through which the public could get tickets for the event listed a Campaign staffer - the Iowa Deputy State Director for Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. - as the event "Organizer." (...)[REMEMBER THIS?](...) 39. The Fundraiser, which solicited donations from members of the public, including New York residents, reaped approximately $5.6 million in tax free donations. Of that total, $2.823 million was contributed to the Foundation. The remainder was donated directly by private donors to veterans charity groups, without going through the Foundation.40. Following the Iowa Fundraiser, the Foundation ceded control over the charitable funds it raised to senior Trump Campaign staff, who dictated the manner in which the Foundation would disburse those proceeds, directing the timing, amounts and recipients of the grants."[The “and he got caught”, part]:"Judge signs off on shutdown of Trump Foundation after ‘pattern of illegality’; Charity allegedly used as Trump’s ‘checkbook’" (Thu 20 Dec 2018):"A New York judge has signed off on a deal to shut down Donald Trump’s personal charity after a lawsuit exposed a “shocking pattern of illegality”.Justice Saliann Scarpulla approved the deal to close the Trump Foundation and split its remaining $1.7m funds between other charities.New York’s attorney general and lawyers for the Trump Foundation will have 30 days to provide Scarpulla with a list of organisations and the attorney general’s office will have the right to reject ones it deems unfit.Trump had used the charity to pay off legal settlements within his business and even to buy a painting of himself to hang in one of his golf clubs.The news that the charity will shut down was announced on Tuesday by New York’s attorney general, Barbara Underwood, who said the Trump Foundation had signed a stipulation agreeing to dissolve the foundation under judicial supervision.The action follows a court decision last month allowing Underwood’s lawsuit against the Trump Foundation, whose directors are Trump and his children Ivanka, Don Jr and Eric.In a statement, Underwood said: “Our petition detailed a shocking pattern of illegality involving the Trump Foundation – including unlawful coordination with the Trump presidential campaign, repeated and willful self-dealing, and much more.This amounted to the Trump Foundation functioning as little more than a checkbook to serve Mr Trump’s business and political interests.”She added: “This is an important victory for the rule of law, making clear that there is one set of rules for everyone.”The attorney general had claimed the charity was used as a “piggy bank” to boost Trump Sr’s 2016 presidential campaign, violating rules that bar not-for-profit groups from engaging in certain types of political activity.The suit claimed that up to $3m in such funds boosted Trump’s campaign. Among examples of improperly used funds is the allegation that the charity spent $10,000 on a giant painting of Trump himself.4. As a result of these persistent violations of law by the Respondents, the Attorney General brings this special proceeding to dissolve the Foundation pursuant to Article 11 of the N-PCL and New York Civil Practice Law and Rules ("CPLR") Article 4.In addition, pursuant to the N-PCL, EPTL, Executive Law and CPLR Article 4, the Attorney General seeks an order (i);…directing Mr. Trump, Donald J. Trump, Jr., Ivanka Trump, and Eric Trump (together, the "Individual Respondents") to make restitution and pay all penalties resulting from the breach of fiduciary duties and their misuse of charitable assets for the benefit of Mr. Trump and his interests; (ii);…enjoining Mr. Trump from future service as an officer, director or trustee, or in any other capacity as a fiduciary of any not-for-profit or charitable organization incorporated or authorized to conduct business in the State of New York, or which solicits charitable donations in the State of New York for a period of ten years, and;….enjoining the remaining Individual Respondents from future service as an officer, director or trustee, or in any other capacity as a fiduciary of any not-for-profit or charitable organization incorporated or authorized to conduct business in the State of New York, or which solicits charitable donations in the State of New York for a period of one year..."11-7-2019: “Judge Says Trump Must Pay $2 Million Over Misuse Of Foundation Funds”:"A New York judge has ruled that President Trump must pay $2 million in damages to settle claims that the Trump Foundation misused funds. The money will go to a group of charities, and the foundation is in the process of dissolving.The case is tied to a televised fundraiser for veterans held by Trump in Iowa when he was running for president in January 2016. Trump had said the funds raised would be distributed to charities. But according to court documents, the Trump Foundation improperly used $2.82 million it received from that fundraiser.According to the judgment, that money "was used for Mr. Trump's political campaign and disbursed by Mr. Trump's campaign staff, rather than by the Foundation," which is unlawful. However, Justice Saliann Scarpulla says the funds did eventually reach charity organizations supporting veterans.The Trump Foundation has shut down, funds that were illegally misused are being restored, the president will be subject to ongoing supervision by my office, and the Trump children had to undergo compulsory training to ensure this type of illegal activity never takes place again,"New York Attorney General Letitia James, whose office filed the case, said in a statement. "The court's decision, together with the settlements we negotiated, are a major victory in our efforts to protect charitable assets and hold accountable those who would abuse charities for personal gain."

Oh yes. I sued an attorney who turned out to be associated with a prestigious law firm.He had an unpaid balance owed on a credit card.He responded to the summons with a letter claiming the lawsuit was commenced improperly, negating any requirement that he file a formal response.Although his letter didn't state a reason i found out he thought that I had neglected to purchase an index number BEFORE serving the Summons and Complaint on him. But purchasing the index number first was NOT required in the Court where the action was pending…I countered with a letter advising that if he didnt file a formal Answer to the Complaint that accompanied the Summons, a Default Judgment would be entered against him.He ignored my letter.As promised I submitted the proper forms and judgment was entered in due course by the judgment clerk.When a “judgment on default” is submitted the clerk pulls the court file and makes sure that the pre requisite documents are already in the file or accompany the judgment form. No judge need be involved if the person sued does not file an answer and the clerk sees all the documentary requirements were met.Additionally, I knew ALL the judgment clerks. I designed my forms to please the judgment clerks. I used to bring pastries to share with them when I visited the clerk's office to file papers or check my “can" for judgments. They would watch out for me.After post judgment enforcement efforts commenced the attorney filed a motion to vacate the judgment setting forth his reasons why the judgment should be thrown out.I opposed the motion and attached the letters we exchanged as exhibits. The judge has the court file with all the documents for his review.On the date the attorney’s motion was heard in court he went first arguing in support of his motion to vacate the judgment and dismiss the underlying complaint.He said a clerk in his firm advised him he did not have to respond to the “defectively” commenced lawsuit.The clerk was wrong…he confused the procedures of the Civil Court of the City of New York with those of the Supreme Court of the County of New York. Different courts, different procedures.I didn't even have to respond because the judge laid into the attorney for heeding a non-attorney's advice.My law suit had been properly commenced, the Judge stated, judgment was properly entered and the Judge not only denied the motion but compelled the attorney, who admitted owing the debt, to pay up, in full, plus accrued interest and court costs, right then and there.Good day for Justice. The prestigious firm apparently did not regularly handle matters in the Civil Court and the clerk in that firm apparently was unfamiliar with that court's procedures.I prosecuted literally thousands of matters in the Civil Court in Manhattan. It is the busiest court in the country.

Most of the time, when banks don't honor a power of attorney it is because they are not satisfied with the document or they are suspicious of the conduct. Some banks require people to use their own forms, which, of course, can cause a problem if the person you are seeking to use the power for is disabled and unable to create a new one.I would suggest checking with a New York attorney to find out your options.