Child Care Licensing Request For Background Check: Fill & Download for Free

Please tell me which gun show will allow me to avoid a background check because of the gun show loophole. I will be first in line to buy some of those guns the government cannot trace back to me. I have been to several gun shows and the ones I have been to have not allowed me to use the gun show loophole to buy without a background check.I did stop going to gun shows a few years ago. I made the mistake of taking my tech savvy son with me. He brought this high tech device called a smart phone. Every time he saw a knife he was interested in (he collects knives which are common at gun shows) he pulled out his phone, tapped on it a few times then put it away and said dad, forget it.I was confused because he knows his dad is an old softy and he is my only child. I have told him many times, if I cannot spoil him from time to time, then why do I have a son? He certainly has caused me more than a few sleepless nights and a few heart stopping scares (like waking up in the morning on vacation in the middle of nowhere to him having a seizure—his mother and I were scared shitless and he did not remember a thing. We had to drive him 10 miles on a 4wd road to a ranger station then wait 30 minutes for an EMT and then he and his mother went for a 2 hour ambulance ride while I went back, got what was needed, locked up, then took off after the ambulance). It is moments like those that scare the hell out of parents and kids just come to and say what happened just as the ambulance gets to the hospital. When nothing can be found he said, well I got you, you should treat me better. He had two more on the 4 hour drive home only to discover that the neurologist cannot figure out why. At college it happened one more time and we get called in the middle of the night to inform us he is in the hospital so we drive like hell for two hours and stay for two days and again nobody knows why.Parents understand this. My son is smart. He knows how much I was willing to spend and he was going to maximize his returns. He learned everything that was supposed to be cheaper at the gun show, was not. He could get it cheaper off the Internet. He also learned some of the stuff being sold were cheap knockoffs. He had fun informing the show promotors and showing them how he knew and then watching the booths get shut down and items confiscated.I wanted to show him what I knew about guns and started pointing out good deals. I was wrong, cheaper and better on the Internet.He was right, why pay for parking, entrance, overpriced food and drinks to buy overpriced goods that might be fakes. We decided it was better to use that time at the gun range.So, I had heard about the Internet loophole, buying guns without background checks. So I finally found a few guns at really great prices and went through the process to buy them. Damn, foiled again, background check time. It was all and good, I pass background checks because I actually have a super clean background and when I worked as a science researcher I had top secret clearance, not because I was working on a top secret project, but because I worked in a building where top secret projects were being worked on at the University I worked at and I needed it to gain access to use the equipment needed for my mundane research project. The building had a small nuclear reactor in it and nobody could go it with out top secret clearance because the people in charge of those decisions thought it was a good idea.Why is the gun show loophole a myth? First, the GCA of 1968 only applies to people who buy guns from a Federal Firearms Licensee (FFL). These are people in the business of selling firearms. With the passage of the Brady act and the mandatory background checks (NICS or national instant criminal check system) all gun sales through a FFL requires a background check. The Federal law does not apply to sales between private parties. So, I have a used gun that I no longer want and I decide to sell it and find a buyer willing to buy it for an agreed on price, he gives me the money and I give him the gun. Under Federal law that is legalUnderstand, the Feds really cannot mandate that the states do much of anything. Federal power is limited. So how does the Federal government get states to go along? Money!!Now, the Feds control the Federal licensing system for firearms dealers because they can involve themselves in anything that is involved in Interstate commerce, even if it does not actually get sold across state lines. It just has to have the potential to be sold or eventually be moved across state lines. People buy guns and then decide later to move to a different state and take their guns with them. That is Interstate commerce. So the can control how FFLs conduct business and require them to do background checks.The feds cannot mandate that private parties conduct background checks. They are not licensed and by definition not in the firearms business. People also cannot be prevented from selling a legal item they own at a later time if they decide for what ever reason they no longer wish to own it. As long as they do not do it regularly enough to meet the definition of being in the business of selling firearms, the feds cannot interfere.Now, the states have the power to mandate their own laws, as long as they are not unconstitutional. So states can mandate background checks for private party sales. Some states do.I live in CA which has mandated this for probably over 20 years (a long time and I am not going to look up the date). So, if I want to sell a gun to another private party, we both have to go to a FFL. The buyer pays a fee mandated by the state and the state conducts the background check. CA does things differently because, well they are CA and just have to complicate matters. This is the state where laws rarely make sense and anyone who tries to make any sense of them will go crazy.CA does not trust the Federal NICS check. I also think they do not trust the FFLs. So the FFLs cannot run the background check like they do in the rest of the country. Nope, they collect all the information and send it to the CA DOJ so their people can run the background checks. CA does not want to share their information with the Feds either, which creates another problem (I will explain later). So CA runs the NICS check, and then searches all of their databases. I once knew how many, but I have since forgotten. It is more than one. The CA database are very incomplete because the county court systems rarely enter the information the DOJ requires, they are underfunded and barely have enough money to keep the courts running at a minimal level. So if you have been arrested, you will not be approved because if no charges were filed, nothing else was entered. The DOJ though demands a disposition be entered, they want to know what happened, were charges dismissed, did it go to trial, what was the result etc. They want to make sure nobody falls through the cracks.So when that happens, the buy has to spend about a year and a few hundred to a few thousand dollars to hunt down everything, get all the records in order, and often this means someone has to personally walk the paperwork to each person who needs to sign off. A lawyer does it much faster but it is costlier.Try to get this done for an arrest 40 years ago when records were not computerized and stored in the courthouse basement.You are guilty until you prove you are innocent. Have the same name as criminal, you will get delayed every time even if you go through the process to get a unique ID number to differentiate yourself from the criminal. With that ID number sometimes you are approved, sometimes delayed, and sometimes denied. You have a better chance of just reapplying again than going through the paperwork and effort to fix it. The odds are better you will get approved faster this way than trying to clear it up again. It always seems the DOJ loses the paperwork or forgets to enter it in their computer system. Keep copies of everything. If you use an attorney the first time, it is faster, a call from the attorney often speeds things up to light speed because at that point their is a real threat with the real documents to back up legal action resulting in a fine and the attorney being compensated by the state rather than by his client. Attorneys cost but it is money worth spending if you need to repeat the same script with the state.Under federal law, only FFLs can use the NICS system. Bloomberg’s group learned the hard way when they pushed Question 1 on Nevada which was to include background checks for private parties. It passed but it could not be implemented and was tossed by the NV Supreme court because it was an impossible regulation. Question 1 required private parties to go to a FFL to conduct the NICS. It was the only way to get enough voters to buy into it. If the state had to set up a system, it would be too costly and require taxpayer money which was a deal killer.The problem was the feds made it clear, FFLs could not access the system for non-FFLs. I believe it was due to privacy issues, accessing personal information about another person. The two private parties might get personal information about each other that could be used for criminal purposes (ID theft) in the future. If a background check is to be conducted for private sales, it has to be done by the state or one of its agencies. I believe for Oregon, it is done through the State Police.As for the weakness with CA, they do not share their information with the Feds. So if someone from CA moves out of state they just might be able to pass a NICS background check because CA withheld information about a conviction for a felony, a DV situation, or even a mental health involuntary hold. Us gun people in CA call these people CA prohibited people. They just have to move to another state and they can legally buy guns because CA will not share their information. CA also has some laws that disqualify people from owning guns that other states do not have. So again if you want a gun and this applies, move to another state. There are many reasons to move and people in this position usually are at the point of screw CA I’m leaving. They do and when they get to the border they take a selfie at the welcome to CA sign flipping the bird or mooning the state. I knew a few who stood on the other side and threw a few high capacity magazines back into the state in front of CA Highway Patrol officers just for laughs and then drove off. They were not in CA and the state was not going to waste the time and effort to arrest them. The CHP officers usually do not even collect the magazines, someone else picks them up.I have attended gun shows in NV. What I have found, every show requires every buyer to go through a NICS background check, even if it is between two private parties. Why? Because every gun show close to CA has undercover ATF agents, undercover CA DOJ agents that have been federally deputized so they can make arrests out of state and are free to conduct investigations out of state and do not need to inform the locals about their presence. They rarely make arrests, they wait for the CA resident to return to CA, it avoids the whole state extradition process. Besides, if they are violating federal law, they take the evidence and hand it over to the ATF agent at the show. The federal penalty for a CA resident buying out of state is 10 years, while the best CA can do it a couple of years for illegally importing guns without going through a CA FFL first.CA will sue the gun show promoter if they find any cause to do so, and have done so even with very little cause. The CA government has the taxpayer money backing them and will go all out because really, it is not their money. The promoter cannot afford to fight so caves quickly. The promotor could be 100% in the right, but it will cost him a few million up front to take that gamble and after a multi-year fight and the long appeals process the state will force if they lose, he might win and might get some attorneys fees but will be out of business and bankrupt. So he settles fast. One settles and most all the others institute the same policies to avoid the same legal battles, it is not worth it.Every sale goes through a background check, mostly to ensure no sales to CA residents. Many promotors require ID to buy larger than 10 round mags. They do not want to have any DA or the DOJ claiming they sell large capacity magazines to CA residents that will end up back in CA. This is BS, because the sales are legal in NV, it is importation into CA that is illegal. Many of us have friends and family in NV. Many who compete in the various gun competitions have storage places or do training in NV part of the year to store the CA banned items that they can legally own, just not possess in CA. So ID is at times required. Some sellers will not sell, others have you sign a paper to acknowledge importing into CA is illegal. Others just pretend to look at the ID and sell anyway.I forgot to mention, we have our own tattle tale in CA, Dr. Garen Wintemute. He teaches at the UC Med Center in Sacramento. He perfected using student interns to secretly videotape Californians buying illegal to own in CA or even illegally buying guns in NV and AZ gun shows. He has his own state funded research center now, The Violence Prevention Research Center Welcome to the Violence Prevention Research ProgramHe is so well known that his picture is posted at every gun show in NV as a person that is not allowed in. He will be forcibly ejected for trespassing. He had himself filmed while this was happening a few times to use for propaganda. The Gun show people got smart and started swarming his camera crew and separated him from them. They had restraining orders against him so brought him to the back and out of camera view he would have some accidents. When handed over to the police, he would have a few more accidents on the way to jail. He decided the pain from the accidents was not worth the publicity and the cops and judges were not sympathetic to him. He walked onto private property in a state that allowed reasonable force to be used to stop a trespasser and evict him after he had been served a restraining order. Every person in his camera crew was served restraining orders which went onto their records and messed up their ability to get scholarships and federal money. A few had some federally banned drugs on them so that just added to their problems, loss of all federal college aid money.Now, I want to point out a misdirection in the CSGV “fact sheet” that is in the link provided under the question.Part way down is this tidbit, “The Gun Control Act of 1968 requires anyone engaged in the business of selling guns to have a Federal Firearms License (FFL) and keep a record of their sales. However, this law does not cover all gun sellers. If a supplier is selling from his or her private collection and the principal objective is not to make a profit, the seller is not “engaged in the business” and is not required to have a license. Because they are unlicensed, these sellers are not required to keep records of sales and are not required to perform background checks on potential buyers, even those prohibited from purchasing guns by the Gun Control Act. The gun show loophole refers to the fact that prohibited purchasers can avoid required background checks by seeking out these unlicensed sellers at gun shows.”The part I bolded is the misdirection. I do have a FFL03 otherwise known as a C&R. This is often referred to as the gun collectors license. People who have these are not true FFLs, they are not in the business of buying and selling guns for a profit. They are the gun collectors. The C&R stands for curio and relics. These are defined as guns that are 50 years or older as well as other that have value as collectors pieces and are listed as such by the ATF. So there are guns newer than 50 years old that are C&R, but they are determined on a case by case basis by the ATF. These are not standard guns people buy at the gun stores and many of these are rather expensive. These are not the ones criminals are out to buy.What is nice about the FFL03, is I can by a C&R gun out of state. It is illegal for me to buy a modern gun outside of my state of residence unless I have that gun sent to a FFL in my state and then go through the background check. Since it has to go through an FFL under federal law, a background check has to be done. If I find a gun on the Internet from an out-of-state private seller, to be legal, the seller has to send it to an FFL in my state. This is done quite a bit these days. The majority of these private sellers are unwilling to sell the gun illegally and if asked to do so, even for a few hundred dollars more will turn you down and likely report you to the admin of the gun selling forum. They do not want to end up with a 10 year federal prison sentence. The ATF does monitor and does have undercover people offer to buy for extra money if the background check can be skipped. It is not worth it. Also, any buyer willing to sell without going through proper channels is either a scammer that will disappear with your money and not deliver the gun, an ATF undercover operation, or a bad guy that wants to meet in a dark ally where you will lose your money and much more and be lucky to leave with your life. This is not worth it.So this part “selling from his or her private collection and the principal objective is not to make a profit, the seller is not “engaged in the business” “ is the exact wording to describe how the AFT determines if a FFL03 needs to get a real FFL (FFL01) license to sell guns from his or her collection or can do it with just their FFL03. There comes a time when age catches up to us and it is time to sell the collection. Several years ago a bunch of old guys in FL were busted because they each had their own FFL03 but were working together as a group to buy and sell C&R guns out of a warehouse and were making a decent profit from it to supplement their SS income. When I mean decent enough, they were making more money than they had at their jobs before retirement and claimed since it was not a business they also did not have to pay taxes. They lost so many ways and ended up spending the rest of their retirement years in a Club Fed resort.I obtained my FFL03 around this time and I got the letter from the ATF making it very clear, I could buy and sell but only for the purposes of the collection and not to engage in a business. So if they discovered I was buying and selling a couple hundred of guns a month for several months, they will take a much closer look, otherwise, enjoy your new hobby.When someone got ahold of a copy of my FFL03 and tried to use it illegally to buy, the ATF agents actually did not treat me as a criminal. They looked over my books, realized I could not have done the buying as I had a job and was present at the job while the guns were being bought 1500 miles away. They helped me get a new license with a new number and all was good. It was determined that the copy was stolen from the records of the last FFL I had purchased from just before he had a heart attack. He specialized in restoring and repairing WWII rifles and then selling them. Someone broke into shop because the local police had not secured it as instructed by the local FBI. They were using various FFL03 they had found to buy C&R guns because the ATF does not have a system to instantly verify them like they do FFL01. He used the guys credit from hacking into his computer system.I can go to a gun show and buy a C&R gun without a background check because I have a federal license that allows me to do so. I can do this in any state. Because of my state’s laws, when I return, I have to register them with the state. I also have to record the guns I acquire using my FFL03 into my own bound book and record when I dispose of them and to whom just like a regular FFL01.So, on many of the undercover gun shows buys of buying without a background check, some of them are because the buyer has a federal license that allows them to buy without a background check and that is just overlooked because it does not sell the narrative.Other times, it is just Joe Blow selling a few guns he has because he no longer needs them or he has unexpected expenses he needs to pay and needs the money. It is legal, it is between two private parties. Many times these same sales happen in the parking lot of Walmarts because they are everywhere and they have cameras so if anything goes wrong, there will be a video for the police. I know of guys in free states that conduct the transaction at the local police station parking lots and nobody gives it a second though, including the police officers that are present.Criminals do not go to gun shows to buy their guns. That is where the ATF is, the police are, anti-gun people are filming everything. That is a lie perpetuated by the MSN and anti-gun groups.Criminals have someone who is not prohibited buy their guns, the straw purchaser. The person selling rarely knows this is the case. How can I know the person buying, who is legally able to buy, will go home and hand the gun over to a relative, friend, or whoever that is prohibited. I am not a mind reader. You might say, well, if a couple comes in and the guy does all the talking and they women buys and does the background check, it is a straw purchase. Go to a local gun range. At mine, on any given day it is very close to 50/50% women and men. I have teen girls who compete in local shooting competitions and they are good. I have shot with them at my local gun range and they put my skills to shame. I can hit what I aim for, I am confident enough for SD but these young ladies come extremely close to 10 bullets in one ragged hole with either a pistol or rifle.Some women take their husbands or BF with them to avoid the still male centric world of gun buying. Some men insist on buying for their women. I wish they would not. I know of many women who are very capable of buying their own guns.Criminals do not buy their guns at gun shows, at least the smart ones. It is only the stupid people that try. I have watched a few dumb people try. People from CA trying to buy at a NV gun show or even a NV gun shop and then getting upset because they can legally buy guns, WTF does being from CA have to do with anything. Their only crime is being stupid.So if you can find a gun show where I can use the loophole to buy a bunch of guns to stash away incase the government goes full retard and wants to take my guns. I could offer up the ones they know about and still rest peacefully knowing I have my guns and am no longer on their hit list. I can now join the resistance as a double agent. The feds think I am clean while at the same time I am working against them. That would be so cool, a real double agent fighting for gun rights. This is the thing that gives the progressive-liberals nightmares because the politicians do know, they can do their best to ban all guns and gun crime will not drop, it will increase. They just use that mantra to get reelected and keep the donations rolling in from those that are scared about guns. The problem is, the gun control crowd support is a mile wide and an inch deep. They do not put up their own money, they have two very rich supporters backing them. If that money dried up overnight, their activist groups would fall apart in days because they would have no money to keep up the fight.Us gun people though, we vote at the ballot box at a much higher percentage than the non-gun people do and we support our cause with our own money.Most do not realize that a large portion of money collected for buying land for wildlife and other conservation activities comes from a federal tax on guns, ammo, and other outdoor equipment and supplies bought by gun people, hunters, fishermen, boaters, and such. This was a self-imposed tax at our request decades ago to preserve wild and open spaces for recreation. If our money was not available for this, these lands would not be available today.In CA, this past year, a budget report noted that the sales of hunting and fishing licenses have sharply declined over the past 10 years. The new background checks for ammo purchases will greatly cut into the money available for conservation efforts because gun and ammo sales are expected to drop sharply. They know people will buy out of state and import back illegally and the state cannot stop that. It is an infraction if caught and to enforce it, a LEO has to personally witness the purchase out of state, then follow the person back to CA before a citation can be issued and it is legally equivalent to a speeding ticket. It is not happening. The law was written with so many exceptions to allow for non-residents to bring ammo into the state legally because the law would be struck down if these were not there. The feds can only control interstate transportation. They did such a terrible job of it that by reading the letter of the law, if my wife and I were out of state, and I bought ammo and then gave it to her, she could legally bring it back into the state without having to bring it to a FFL for a background check.Family members can send ammo to relatives into the state (only certain relationships) without background checks. The rules for significant others is so loose, we have to be politically correct in this state, that you could easily have a partner send you the ammo into the state legally. So, hey, you can be my intimate partner today, and I will get a new one tomorrow. Nobody is going to check the bedroom and besides relationships are whatever we define them to be.You know who is starting to get upset over this realization, the progressive liberals, especially the LGBT because it is exploiting their cause for violence. The more conservatives do not care, what ever you want fine, we will play your game and still get our ammo. We also win because now we do not have to pay sales tax to this state and we get to help starve the beast.I get to use the FFL03 loophole. I can bring ammo into the state without a background check because the law allows it. The ATF has seen a huge spike recently in the number of FFL03 applications from CA. So sell the reasonable gun control laws fiction, FFL03 who also pass a state yearly background check and get something called a COE are exempt from several gun laws because we are the law abiding gun owners.Our previous Attorney General and now US Senator, camel toe harris did not like this several years ago and tried to reinterpret the meaning of the law and said it did not mean what it said. The CA Supreme Court just ruled that was an illegal interpretation and the laws mean exactly what they say. The legislature is very capable of writing laws to mean what they say and if they can’t do that, it is their problem, that is their job and they have the Attorney General and hundreds of attorneys working for the state to assist with that.So, all of us law abiding gun owners can now go through 2 more background checks that will again prove that no matter how many background checks we go through in a day, 1 or 100, we are still not criminals so just leave us alone and go after the real criminals that you keep releasing from prison because you waste money fighting against the rights of the law abiding citizens that could be used to actually take the real criminals off the streets and do something that will reduce violence.

More times than can be counted. For everything from unconscionable wild party damage (even to 9 foot ceilings) to filth so disgusting no one could even figure out how it got there or what it was.Also for calling and texting me 80 times in 2 days with assinine requests for things that were the responsibility of police. This was in a somewhat high-end neighborhood, not a war zone).A very, very few can be greedy, malicious, and stupid in how to con you out of money.One threatened to sue me and file complaints with HUD, the BBB, and any state agency she could think of of for discrimination. This was months after she was in the condo and she wanted a big reduction in rent when the rent was already slightly below market value. She said I was both a misogynist and a racist.I'm not minority but I am female, and I “discriminate” only against those who are not credit worthy, have insufficient income, or whose background checks turn up criminal records, evictions, etcThis tenant said that I was discriminating against her because I had declined to hold the property for an indefinite period of time for her, Why wouldn't I? Because she did not give me one penny of deposit, an application, a phone number, any indication of her income or ability to qualify, any way to contact her, or any information at all. I was supposed to hold the property until whenever she decided to give me some information, simply because she, a complete stranger about whom I knew nothing, told me to. No landlord is that stupid.When she applied properly the next day she was accepted. So what was her problem? None. Now, months later, she comes up with this because she wanted a big rent reduction.Another made repeated cursing, screaming, insulting demands over 2. months, followed by a letter of demand from her attorney threatening a lawsuit because I would not replace an almost new dishwasher that 2 DW repairmen from 2 different independent companies had told me was functioning perfectly and that they could find nothing to repair.The tenant and her attorney still insisted that moisture from it destroyed her four-year-old’s health and they wanted compensation for his illness, his distress, his alleged disability, and his mother's time off from work to care for this allegedly disabled child, They provided no evidence whatsoever.Being Hard-hearted Hannah, I pointed out that if necessary I would admit to the judge that neither the 2 repairman nor I knew how to make a DW work without water and heat, the combination of which could conceivably release a little steam if you opened the door before it finished drying and cooling. And I would also provide the judge the invoices from the 2 separate service companies that said in writing that the dishwasher worked exactly as it was supposed to - and charge the tenant for the cost, as I already should have. (Of course, I had had to pay for two separate service calls for no reason except tenant maliciousness.)I responded to the attorney’s threatening letter by repeating that, and also pointed out to them that if the son was allergic to water and heat contained in a waterproof cabinet, and it was destroying his health, one might wonder why my tenant had not stopped using the heated drying cycle or stopped using the dishwasher at all. I also sent copies of the invoices for the service calls that both stated no repairs were necessary and a picture of the open dishwasher looking exactly as it would have looked in the appliance store. No indication of mold or anything of the sort.I never heard another word from the lawyer (yes, this moron was a licensed attorney) and nothing on the subject from the tenant again..Then there are the tenants who can't read a lease or state law to see that the landlord has not only a right, but a legal responsibility, to enter the property for a variety of reasons and won't let you in, even to do even repairs that they ask for, except at night when they are home.Repair companies don't work that way, and it's ridiculous to expect the landlord to pay the repair companies emergency rates, which is what you get at night. It's aso harder to get people to respond to the work requests for night work, too.Those are the terrible types of tenants. But most tenants are either just fine or absolutely wonderful, and I enjoyed knowing them and working with them. They were the best part of the business, which could be fun for me. Some even became good friends and remained so after moving out of the property.When I was working only for myself and had no underfunded owners pushing me to put somebody, anybody with money up front, in their vacant properties, as underfunded landlords often do, I didn’t have such problems, although that may have been partly luck.But with careful screening, I could weed out the tenants from hell easily. They don't become terrible tenants the instant they are in your property. They were already terrible, and would have a record of it. Awful credit with lots of write-offs, can't keep a job, evictions, criminal records, leaving prior properties with damage unpaid for, problems with neighbors that required homeowners association or law enforcement involvement, etc.That's why good landlords do those background checks. That saves them and their other tenants who would be exposed to these people a lot of headaches.

Criminal history checks can be performed at backgroundtool.com Look at personal reports or check out any individual. Arrest and Public records include things like general public, courtroom, police arrest, felony, essential, and many other documents.Do most pre-employment background checks look for federal convictions?What Is A Criminal Background Check For Employment?A Criminal History Background Check For Employment is a search of criminal history files for an applicant's possible criminal records. Criminal record searches are the core of most employment background checks and are the most common of all searches requested from A Matter of Fact.Criminal Background Check, Criminal Record Check, and Employment Criminal Background Check are common names that are used interchangeably.What Does An Employment Criminal Background Check Consist of?By far the most common criminal record check is a County Criminal Records Check in the applicant's counties of residence for the last seven years.Several Criminal Record Searches are available to help meet employer and job requirements including:County Criminal Records Check: checks county court recordsFederal Criminal Records Check: expands criminal records checks to federal offenses'Statewide' Criminal Records Check and 'Nationwide' Criminal Database Check: are useful supplements to County Criminal Record ChecksSex Offender Registry Check: is essential for health care, child/youth/elder care, teaching, residential management, hospitality, social services, and similar at-risk positionsGlobal Homeland Security Search: checks databases such as the Health and Human Services Exclusion List, Interpol Most Wanted, and OFACInternational Criminal History Records Searches: are also availableNote: Criminal history is only one facet of an applicant's character. For example, Education, Employment, and Professional License verifications check an applicant's history for appropriate skills, experience, and workplace behaviors. Relatively few prospective employees have criminal records relevant to the position for which they are being considered. On the other hand issues are regularly uncovered when conducting Education, Employment, and Professional License verifications. For information about what goes into a complete background check see Comprehensive Background Checks