Flourish 2013 Summer Camp Application: Fill & Download for Free

Yes, President Donald John Trump will be re-elected. A growing economy, lowest unemployment rates, lower illegal entries at the southern border, more drugs seized at the southern border,withdrawn from disastrous trade deals, withdrawn from the catastrophic Paris climate accord,more regulations slashed, more conservative federal judges installed, prison reform,finally a pay raise for our US military members, finally a pay raise for our senior citizens on social security, improvements to Medicare and Medicaid coverages for senior citizens, improvements to Veterans Affairs coverages and veterans care,reopened more national forests, national park, national recreation areas, national monuments, national wilderness areas to public access public use and public enjoyment,clean coal initiative to open and build more clean coal power plants, build and open more natural gas power plants, build new and more petroleum refinement facilities, build new and more nuclear power plants based on thorium,revitalized and improve the US space program, revitalize and improve the US military capabilities,improve the US solar observatory program satellites, funding earth science, and climate research by Professor Valentina Zharkova and her presentation of how the Earth’s Natural Climate Cycles are controlled and determined by the Natural Solar Cycles (Solar Maximums, Grand Solar Maximums, Solar Minimums, Grand Solar Minimums),funding earth science and climate research by John L. Casey, author of the books, “‎Upheaval, Dark Winter, Cold Sun” and a climate researcher who has independently proven the Natural Solar Cycles of Solar Maximums, Grand Solar Maximums, Solar Minimums, Grand Solar Minimums, which in turn, controls and directly causes the Earth’s Natural Climate Cycles,funding earth science and climate research by other well-respected scientists who have been fired or threatened with dismissal if they do not stop talking about Natural Solar Cycles of Solar Maximums, Grand Solar Maximums, Solar Minimums, Grand Solar Minimums, which in turn, controls and directly causes the Earth’s Natural Climate Cycles,Here are more earth science and climate research the Trump Administration has funded on Natural Solar Cycles of Solar Maximums, Grand Solar Maximums, Solar Minimums, Grand Solar Minimums, which in turn, controls and directly causes the Earth’s Natural Climate Cycles.#GlobalWarming #JohnColeman #TheWeatherChannelFounder of The Weather Channel Slams Global Warming!109,918 views • Published on Mar 20, 2008The John Birch SocietyPart 1: Founder of The Weather Channel Slams Global Warming! (Founder of The Weather Channel Slams Global Warming!)Part 2: Founder of The Weather Channel Slams Global Warming! (Part 2) (Founder of The Weather Channel Slams Global Warming! (Part 2))Part 3: Founder of The Weather Channel Slams Global Warming! (Part 3) (Founder of The Weather Channel Slams Global Warming! (Part 3))Part 4: Founder of The Weather Channel Slams Global Warming! (Part 4) (Founder of The Weather Channel Slams Global Warming! (Part 4))___________________________________________________________________________________The Last Time the Globe WarmedTry CuriosityStream today: http://curiositystream.com/eons (http://curiositystream.com/eons)https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ldLBoErAhz4Viewers like you help make PBS (Thank you 😃) . Support your local PBS Member Station here: PBS: Donate (PBS: Donate)Imagine an enormous, lush rainforest teeming with life...in the Arctic. Well, there was a time -- and not too long ago -- when the world warmed more than any human has ever seen. (So far)Produced in collaboration with PBS Digital Studios: http://youtube.com/pbsdigitalstudios.com (http://youtube.com/pbsdigitalstudios.com)Special thanks to Nobumichi Tamura for allowing us to use his work:Spinops (Spinops)Want to follow Eons elsewhere on the internet?Facebook - Log In or Sign Up to View (Log In or Sign Up to View)Twitter - Eons (@EonsShow) | Twitter (Eons (@EonsShow) | Twitter)Instagram - Eons (@eonsshow) • Instagram photos and videos (Eons (@eonsshow) • Instagram photos and videos)References:CU Boulder Today (CU Boulder Today)Science Advances (Science Advances)Geology | GeoScienceWorld (Geology | GeoScienceWorld)Science, health and medical journals, full-text articles and books. (Science, health and medical journals, full-text articles and books.)Science (Science)130 million publications on ResearchGate (130 million publications on ResearchGate)Archive of all online content (Archive of all online content)http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/ (http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/)https://www.e-education.psu.edu/earth (https://www.e-education.psu.edu/earth)NASA Earth Observatory - Home (NASA Earth Observatory - Home)Palaeontology [online] (Palaeontology [online])http://www.nature.com/ngeo/journal/ (http://www.nature.com/ngeo/journal/)http://cdiac.ess-dive.lbl.gov/trends/ (http://cdiac.ess-dive.lbl.gov/trends/)Index of /FTP (Index of /FTP)https://www.sciencealert.com/carbon-emergency (https://www.sciencealert.com/carbon-emergency)https://www.nature.com/ngeo/journal/ (https://www.nature.com/ngeo/journal/)https://ucsdnews.ucsd.edu/pressrelease (https://ucsdnews.ucsd.edu/pressrelease)NASA Earth Observatory - Home (NASA Earth Observatory - Home)http://www.ei.lehigh.edu/eli/cc/resource (http://www.ei.lehigh.edu/eli/cc/resource)http://people.earth.yale.edu/paleocenane (http://people.earth.yale.edu/paleocenane)Thomas Kammer, West Virginia University (Thomas Kammer, West Virginia University)Eocene (Eocene)http://all-geo.org/highlyallochthonou (http://all-geo.org/highlyallochthonou)...http://academic.evergreen.edu/z/zita/ (http://academic.evergreen.edu/z/zita/)...http://naturalhistory.si.edu/ete/ETE_ (http://naturalhistory.si.edu/ete/ETE_)...https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/arti (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/arti)...National Geographic Magazine (National Geographic Magazine)...Science, health and medical journals, full-text articles and books. (Science, health and medical journals, full-text articles and books.)...https://www.livescience.com/15597-pri (https://www.livescience.com/15597-pri)...https://news.nationalgeographic.com/n (https://news.nationalgeographic.com/n)...http://electronic-earth.net/3/19/2008 (http://electronic-earth.net/3/19/2008)...The Geological Society of London (https://www.geolsoc.org.uk/Geoscienti)...https://www.nature.com/articles/ngeo1 (https://www.nature.com/articles/ngeo1)...http://www.whoi.edu/fileserver.do?id= (http://www.whoi.edu/fileserver.do?id=)...Caption authors (Spanish)Juan de Dios Ayala GonzálezMariana Sánchez TapiaRodrigo Valenzuela ShawcroftCategory: Science & Technology___________________________________________________________________________________Is an Ice Age Coming? | Space Time | PBS Digital Studios2,894,274 views•Published on May 25, 2016https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ztninkgZ0wsSpoiler: no (and climate change has nothing to do with this).Get your own Space Time t­shirt at http://bit.ly/1QlzoBi (http://bit.ly/1QlzoBi)Tweet at us! @pbsspacetimeFacebook: PBS SpaceTime (http://facebook.com/pbsspacetime)Email us! [email protected] (mailto:[email protected])Comment on Reddit: PBS Space Time • r/pbsspacetime (http://www.reddit.com/r/pbsspacetime)Support us on Patreon! PBS Space Time is creating Astrophysics Videos | Patreon (http://www.patreon.com/pbsspacetime)Help translate our videos! http://www.youtube.com/timedtext_cs_p (http://www.youtube.com/timedtext_cs_p)...We’re living in a brief window of time where our planet isn’t frozen underneath a giant layer of glaciers. How much longer will the moderate climate that we’ve come to know as “normal” continue? What causes these dramatic shifts in temperature that thaw our planet and then throw it back into a state of deep freeze? This episode looks at how the changes in our planet’s orbit and rotation impacts our climate.Written and hosted by Matt O’DowdMade by Kornhaber Brown (Home | kornhaberbrown (http://www.kornhaberbrown.com))Comments: 4798alexander4798https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UwYSW...Ryan Lidsterhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UwYSW...Physics Videos by Eugene Khutoryanskyhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UwYSW...Other Links:Physics Girl: Is Energy Always Conserved?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GHCc9...PBS Idea Channel: Is Math a Feature of the Universe or a Feature of Human Creation?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TbNym...Caption authors (Turkish)Uzak EvrenlerMelih Rustu CALIKOGLUCategory: Education___________________________________________________________________________________How Volcanoes Froze the Earth (Twice)675,313 views•Published on Jul 17, 2019https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ONwQV26L-kOver 600 million years ago, sheets of ice coated our planet on both land and sea. How did this happen? And most importantly for us, why did the planet eventually thaw again? The evidence for Snowball Earth is written on every continent today.Thanks to Julio Lacerda and Franz Anthony from Studio 252mya for their wonderful illustrations. You can find more of their work here: Studio 252MYA (https://252mya.com/)Special thanks to Judy Pu for answering our questions about Snowball Earth.Produced in collaboration with PBS Digital Studios: PBS Digital Studios (http://youtube.com/pbsdigitalstudios)Super special thanks to the following Patreon patrons for helping make Eons possible:Katie Fichtner, Anthony Callaghan, MissyElliottSmith, The Scintillating Spencer, AA, Zachary Spencer, Stefan Weber, Ilya Murashov, Charles Kahle, Robert Amling, Po Foon Kwong, Larry Wilson, Merri Snaidman, John Vanek, Neil H. Gray, Esmeralda Rupp-Spangle, Gregory Donovan, الخليفي سلطان, Gabriel Cortez, Marcus Lejon, Robert Arévalo, Robert Hill, Todd Dittman, Betsy Radley, PS, Philip Slingerland, Jose Garcia, Eric Vonk, Tony Wamsley, Henrik Peteri, Jonathan Wright, Jon Monteiro, James Bording, Brad Nicholls, Miles Chaston, Michael McClellan, Jeff Graham, Maria Humphrey, Nathan Paskett, Connor Jensen, Daisuke Goto, Hubert Rady, Gregory Kintz, Tyson Cleary, Chandler Bass, Joao Ascensao, Tsee Lee, Sarah Fritts, Alex Yan.If you'd like to support the channel, head over to http://patreon.com/eons (http://patreon.com/eons), and pledge for some cool rewards!Want to follow Eons elsewhere on the internet?Facebook - Log In or Sign Up to View (Log In or Sign Up to View)Twitter - Eons (@EonsShow) | Twitter (Eons (@EonsShow) | Twitter)Instagram - Eons (@eonsshow) • Instagram photos and videos (Eons (@eonsshow) • Instagram photos and videos)References: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1d (https://docs.google.com/document/d/1d)...Category: Science & Technology___________________________________________________________________________________The Power of Volcanoes Pt. 1: Years without Summer | Full Documentary1,009,637 views•Published on Jun 3, 2017https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7fR2Z880z8In the 6th century AD, large parts of the world were affected by mysterious weather events causing temperature drop, crop failures and famines. The series’ first episode analyzes how one single volcano probably caused “The Years Without Summer”, also known as Little Ice Age.The Power of Volcanoes Pt. 2: In the Shade of burning Mountains | Full Documentary702,558 views•Published on Jun 17, 2017https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gzJ5oy-DBoABig Volcanic eruptions are very rare compared to the duration of human life. Only indications of passed catastrophes can give us a clue what could happen in the future. An epidemic in Europe, Sulphur sediments found in the ice of Greenland and a forever disappeared nation – could a volcano connect all these things? Scientists reconstruct passed catastrophes and explain the power of the stone giants.Category: Science & Technology___________________________________________________________________________________How Much Does the Sun Affect Earth's Climate?90,045 views•Published on Jul 10, 2018https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JlYgFM9ndd4The sun is obviously a big factor in the earth's weather, but changes in the solar cycle don't always affect our climate in straightforward ways.Host: Caitlin HofmeisterFor special, curated artifacts of this universe, check out https://scishowfinds.com/ (https://scishowfinds.com/)Support SciShow by becoming a patron on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/scishow (https://www.patreon.com/scishow)Dooblydoo thanks go to the following Patreon supporters:Lazarus G, Sam Lutfi, Nicholas Smith, D.A. Noe, سلطان الخليفي, Piya Shedden, KatieMarie Magnone, Scott Satovsky Jr, Charles Southerland, Patrick D. Ashmore, Tim Curwick, Charles George, Kevin Bealer, Chris Peters. Like SciShow? Want to help support us, and also get things to put on your walls, cover your torso and hold your liquids? Check out our awesome products over at DFTBA Records: http://dftba.com/scishow (http://dftba.com/scishow)Looking for SciShow elsewhere on the internet?Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/scishow (http://www.facebook.com/scishow)Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/scishow (http://www.twitter.com/scishow)Tumblr: http://scishow.tumblr.com (http://scishow.tumblr.com)Instagram: http://instagram.com/thescishow (http://instagram.com/thescishow)Sources:https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/no (https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/no)...https://arxiv.org/pdf/1204.4449.pdf (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1204.4449.pdf)https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.c (https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.c)...https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/su (https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/su)...https://www.giss.nasa.gov/research/br (https://www.giss.nasa.gov/research/br)...https://www.ucsusa.org/global-warming (https://www.ucsusa.org/global-warming)...https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Fea (https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Fea)...https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/e (https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/e)...https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/global-warm (https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/global-warm)...http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/1 (http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/1)...https://phys.org/news/2017-03-sun-imp (https://phys.org/news/2017-03-sun-imp)...https://www.scientificamerican.com/ar (https://www.scientificamerican.com/ar)...https://www.space.com/19280-solar-act (https://www.space.com/19280-solar-act)...http://science.sciencemag.org/content (http://science.sciencemag.org/content)...http://faculty.wcas.northwestern.edu/ (http://faculty.wcas.northwestern.edu/)...Images:https://www.istockphoto.com/vector/tr (https://www.istockphoto.com/vector/tr)...https://www.istockphoto.com/vector/th (https://www.istockphoto.com/vector/th)...https://images.nasa.gov/details-GSFC_ (https://images.nasa.gov/details-GSFC_)...https://www.videoblocks.com/video/sno (https://www.videoblocks.com/video/sno)...https://www.istockphoto.com/vector/wi (https://www.istockphoto.com/vector/wi)...https://images.nasa.gov/details-PIA18 (https://images.nasa.gov/details-PIA18)...https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/10804 (https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/10804)https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/4551 (https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/4551)https://www.istockphoto.com/vector/ea (https://www.istockphoto.com/vector/ea)...Category: Education___________________________________________________________________________________Solar Variability and Climate - Joanna D. Haigh11,385 views•Published on Jul 12, 2017https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1MPQYN6fnQSerious Science - http://serious-science.org (http://serious-science.org)Joanna D. Haigh on the ‘little ice age’, solar radiation, and global warminghttp://serious-science.org/solar-vari (http://serious-science.org/solar-vari)...Category: Science & Technology___________________________________________________________________________________Dan Britt - Orbits and Ice Ages: The History of ClimateDr. Britt does a fantastic job at explaining how the earth’s non-linear orbits around the sun, the swinging magnetic poles, the oscillating spin, and planetary ocean heating and cooling cycles, and the solar cycles are all major factors in normal climate change.However, in the last 1/3 of the film, Dr. Britt does jump on liberal bandwagon, blaming human use of agriculture and fossil fuels as the major contributors of higher CO2 and Methane releases as the reason for the delayed normal galactical formation into the next Ice Age.330,564 views•Published on Feb 8, 2012Another lecture in IHMC's award-winning lecture series. http://www.ihmc.us (http://www.ihmc.us)Climate change has become a major political issue, but few understand how climate has changed in the past and the forces that drive climate. Most people don't know that fifty million years ago there were breadfruit trees and crocodiles on the shores of the Arctic Ocean, or that 18,000 years ago there was a mile-thick glacier on Manhattan and a continuous belt of winter sea ice extending south to Cape Hatteras. The History of Climate provides the context of our current climate debate and fundamental insight into how the climate works.Dr. Daniel Britt is a Professor of Astronomy and Planetary Sciences at the Department of Physics, University of Central Florida. He was educated at the University of Washington and Brown University, receiving a Ph.D. from Brown in 1991. He has had a varied career including service in the US Air Force as an ICBM missile launch officer and an economist for Boeing before going into planetary sciences. He has served on the science teams of two NASA missions, Mars Pathfinder and Deep Space 1. He was the project manager for the camera on Mars Pathfinder and has built hardware for all the NASA Mars landers.Britt currently does research on the physical properties and mineralogy of asteroids, comets, the Moon, and Mars under several NASA grants. Honors include 5 NASA Achievement Awards, election as a Fellow of the Meteoritical Society, and an asteroid named after him; 4395 Dan Britt. He is currently President of the Division for Planetary Sciences of the American Astronomical Society. He lives in Orlando with his wife, Judith. They have two sons, ages 16 and 21.Category: Science & Technology___________________________________________________________________________________Princeton's William Happer rebuts myth of carbon pollution128,059 viewshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M8iEEO2UIbADr. William Happer, professor of physics at Princeton University, summarizes his arguments about the myth of carbon pollution. It's that myth that underlies global warming alarmists' key arguments. Happer offered these comments during a Sept. 8, 2014, speech for the John Locke Foundation's Shaftesbury Society.Category: News & Politics___________________________________________________________________________________Global Warming: Fact or Fiction? Featuring Physicists Willie Soon and Elliott Bloom241,166 views•Published on Aug 16, 2019https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1zrejG-WI3UIs global warming real? Have any such predictions been established scientifically? Would massive “carbon” taxes and other controls put America and the world—especially the poor—at great risk? “Especially the “Green New Deal” will have a catastrophic financial effect on all nations, especially with the poverty and working class peoples.”At this special event, a geoscientist and astrophysicist Willie Soon separates fact from fiction in the global warming debate. He explains why the forecasts from CO2 climate models have been so wrong—and why solar influences on clouds, oceans, and wind drive climate change, not CO2 emissions. Stanford University physicist Elliott Bloom then comments.“The whole point of science is to question accepted dogmas. For that reason, I respect Willie Soon as a good scientist and a courageous citizen.”—Freeman J. Dyson, Professor Emeritus of Physics, Institute for Advanced Study; Templeton Prize Laureate“I am writing to express my deep admiration and respect for Dr. Willie Soon, a fine astrophysicist and human being... As Willie has shown in many ways, observational facts do not fit the CO2 dogma, and an enormous amount of evidence points to the Sun as a much more important driver of climate... Willie was right—whatever the cause of changing temperature, the main driver cannot be the concentration of atmospheric CO2.”—William Happer, Chairman, Presidential Committee on Climate Security; Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Emeritus, Princeton University; Member, National Academy of SciencesWillie Soon is a geophysicist at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. He received his Ph.D. (with distinction) in aeronautical engineering from the University of Southern California, and he has been Astronomer at the Mount Wilson Observatory; Senior Scientist at the George C. Marshall Institute; Senior Visiting Fellow at the State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science at Xiamen University; and Professor of Environmental Studies at the University of Putra Malaysia. The author of 90 scientific papers, he has IEEE received the Nuclear & Plasma Sciences Society Award, Rockwell Dennis Hunt Award, Smithsonian Institution Award, Courage in Defense of Science Award, Petr Beckmann Award for Courage and Achievement in Defense of Scientific Truth and Freedom, and Frederick Seitz Memorial Award.Elliott D. Bloom is Professor Emeritus in the Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Laboratory (SLAC) at Stanford University and a Fellow of the American Physical Society. He was a member of the SLAC team with Jerome I. Friedman, Henry W. Kendall and Richard E. Taylor who received the Nobel Prize in Physics. He received his Ph.D. in physics from the California Institute of Technology, he is the author of numerous scientific papers, and he is the recipient of the Senior Scientist Award from the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation.For further information on and to order copies of the Independent Institute book, "Hot Talk, Cold Science: Global Warming's Unfinished Debate," by geophysicist S. Fred Singer, please go here:http://www.independent.org/store/book (http://www.independent.org/store/book)...The Independent Institute is a non-profit, non-partisan, public-policy research and educational organization that shapes ideas into profound and lasting impact. The mission of Independent is to advance peaceful, prosperous boldly, and free societies grounded in a commitment to human worth and dignity. Applying independent thinking to issues that matter, the Independent Institute creates transformational ideas for today’s most pressing social and economic challenges. The results of this work are published as books, the quarterly journal, "The Independent Review," and other publications and form the basis for numerous conference and media programs. By connecting these ideas with other organizations and networks, Independent seeks to inspire action that can unleash an era of unparalleled human flourishing at home and around the globe.Independent Institute:http://www.independent.org/ (http://www.independent.org/)“The Independent Review: A Journal of Political Economy” (Quarterly Journal):http://www.independent.org/publicatio (http://www.independent.org/publicatio)...Independent Institute Books:http://www.independent.org/store/inde (http://www.independent.org/store/inde)...FREE Email Updates from the Independent Institute:http://www.independent.org/register/s (http://www.independent.org/register/s)...Become a Member of the Independent Institute and receive a FREE gift:https://secure.independent.org/donate/ (https://secure.independent.org/donate/)Category: Education___________________________________________________________________________________A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to Global Warming717,286 views•Published on Nov 11, 2014https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RZlICdawHRASteven F. Hayward, Pepperdine UniversityThis lecture is part of Hillsdale College's 2014 CCA series. To learn more about Hillsdale College and the CCA programs, visit http://www.hillsdale.edu/outreach/cca (http://www.hillsdale.edu/outreach/cca)Category: EducationCreated using YouTube Video EditorSource videos View attributions___________________________________________________________________________________Climate Change Reconsidered: Science the U.N. Will Exclude from Its Next Climate Report54,486 views•Published on Sep 24, 2013https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jaVL1Ham-4A"Climate Change Reconsidered II: Physical Science" -- produced by a team of 40 scientists -- is the newest volume in the Climate Change Reconsidered series produced by The Heartland Institute and members of the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change (NIPCC). As in previous reports, thousands of peer-reviewed articles are cited to determine the current state-of-the-art of climate science. This newest volume's findings challenge the alarmist reports of the United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), whose next report is due out later this month. NIPCC authors paid special attention to contributions that were overlooked by the IPCC or that presented data, discussion, or implications, arguing against the IPCC's claim that dangerous global warming is occurring, or will occur, from human-related greenhouse gas emissions.Category: News & Politics___________________________________________________________________________________Dr Willie Soon demolishes the extreme weather panic and other hysterical arguments20,701 views•Published on Aug 23, 2019Dr. Willie Soon covers a range of issues including extreme weather, climate models, and possible alternative explanations for the observed variation.For more info, see http://swarnabharat.in/climate (http://swarnabharat.in/climate)Category: News & Politics___________________________________________________________________________________These are just a handful of the dozens of videos and pieces of science-based information which can be used to COMPLETELY DESTROY the PARIS “Climate Change” and the “Global Warming” conspiracy theories. These are the scientists who have proven, Al Gore is a LIAR!Please, think before simply believing everything the mainstream news media keeps cramming into your cranium. The US mainstream news media and US social media platforms are all corporately owned, professional spin doctors. The news anchors all look similar to the over-dressed Hunger Games Hosts or Sleazy Televangelists strutting around in their glitzy glammed up studios. All of the US mainstream news media and social media are purely ultra-leftists biased, special interest groups influenced, completely funded by ultra-wealthy multi-billionaire and muti-trillionaire families.Remember, the US mainstream news media and US social media platforms are completely compliant and subservient to the Globalist agenda of the CIA, NSA, MI5, and Mossad. The news media and social media news are only allowed to crank out the Globalist filth through Operation Mockingbird, the CIA, NSA, MI5, and Mossad Global news media control network. The big problem is, now that Operation Mockingbird has been “outed” the CIA, NSA, MI5, and Mossad has begun to use other more sophisticated covert mainstream news media manipulation operations, entertainment industry manipulation operations, and social media manipulation operations. These newer and more sophisticated covert mainstream news media manipulation operations, covert entertainment industry manipulation operations, and covert social media manipulation operations are specifically designed to “feed” directly to the global populations only the information, entertainment, and social media interaction they (CIA, NSA, MI5, Mossad) have chosen for the US, UK, EU, Israel, and basically the majority of the world’s populations to read, hear, see, and believe. If you doubt me, go ahead and click on these links, read for yourself, these credible news networks, who are now reporting on Operation Mockingbird, after a blizzard of Freedom of Information Act applications were filed by US Citizens, UK Citizens, French Citizens, German Citizens, Russian Citizens, Canadian Citizens, Italian Citizens, Australian Citizens, and Israeli Citizens. Operation Mockingbird | Operation, Outcome, Facts & Summary Notes (Operation Mockingbird | Operation, Outcome, Facts & Summary Notes) // User Clip: Operation Mockingbird exposed on C-Span (User Clip: Operation Mockingbird exposed on C-Span) // Underground Knowledge - A discussion group (Underground Knowledge - A discussion group) / Carl Bernstein (Carl Bernstein) // Operation Mockingbird: New York Times confesses to role in subverting First Amendment (Operation Mockingbird: New York Times confesses to role in subverting First Amendment)Project Echelon is the CIA, NSA, MI5, and Mossad information and intelligence gathering program to sweep up all telecommunications, cellular, internet, social media, cable television subscriptions, cable television viewing habits, satellite television subscriptions, satellite television viewing habits, law enforcement fire-rescue and ambulance radio communications and location tracking, CB radio communications and location tracking, HAM radio communications and location tracking, all other electronic communications and location tracking. Ex-Snoop Confirms Echelon Network (Ex-Snoop Confirms Echelon Network)Project Nightingale is the CIA, NSA, MI5, and Mossad mission to collect, store, and constantly update DNA samples and detailed health information on as many people around the globe as they can. Fortunately, one of their front companies, Google, got caught collecting detailed health information on US Citizens. WSJ News Exclusive | Google’s ‘Project Nightingale’ Triggers Federal Inquiry (WSJ News Exclusive | Google’s ‘Project Nightingale’ Triggers Federal Inquiry)Some of these videos are frequently deleted from YouTube, then resubmitted in an edited format, until the college or original posting educational program files a civil suit against YouTube. YouTube then relents and allows the original video and presentation to be posted in an unedited format.Might the actions of YouTube clue you into the political camp YouTube chooses to side with? It would seem the ultra-liberal camp has taken a firm hold of YouTube. YouTube’s ultra-liberal self-appointed sensors, at will, sensors the substance of all videos, comments, accounts, and users on YouTube, without any oversite. The sad thing is, these videos are available some days, gone or highly edited a few days, then back on a few days later.Respectfully,Randy Jay Pine

Re-elected President Donald John Trump. A growing economy, lowest unemployment rates, lower illegal entries at the southern border, more drugs seized at the southern border,withdrawn from disastrous trade deals, withdrawn from the catastrophic Paris climate accord,more regulations slashed, more conservative federal judges installed, prison reform,finally a pay raise for our US military members, finally a pay raise for our senior citizens on social security, improvements to Medicare and Medicaid coverages for senior citizens, improvements to Veterans Affairs coverages and veterans care,reopened more national forests, national park, national recreation areas, national monuments, national wilderness areas to public access public use and public enjoyment,clean coal initiative to open and build more clean coal power plants, build and open more natural gas power plants, build new and more petroleum refinement facilities, build new and more nuclear power plants based on thorium,revitalized and improve the US space program, revitalize and improve the US military capabilities,improve the US solar observatory program satellites, funding earth science, and climate research by Professor Valentina Zharkova and her presentation of how the Earth’s Natural Climate Cycles are controlled and determined by the Natural Solar Cycles (Solar Maximums, Grand Solar Maximums, Solar Minimums, Grand Solar Minimums),funding earth science and climate research by John L. Casey, author of the books, “‎Upheaval, Dark Winter, Cold Sun” and a climate researcher who has independently proven the Natural Solar Cycles of Solar Maximums, Grand Solar Maximums, Solar Minimums, Grand Solar Minimums, which in turn, controls and directly causes the Earth’s Natural Climate Cycles,funding earth science and climate research by other well-respected scientists who have been fired or threatened with dismissal if they do not stop talking about Natural Solar Cycles of Solar Maximums, Grand Solar Maximums, Solar Minimums, Grand Solar Minimums, which in turn, controls and directly causes the Earth’s Natural Climate Cycles,Here are more earth science and climate research the Trump Administration has funded on Natural Solar Cycles of Solar Maximums, Grand Solar Maximums, Solar Minimums, Grand Solar Minimums, which in turn, controls and directly causes the Earth’s Natural Climate Cycles.#GlobalWarming #JohnColeman #TheWeatherChannelFounder of The Weather Channel Slams Global Warming!109,918 views • Published on Mar 20, 2008The John Birch SocietyPart 1: Founder of The Weather Channel Slams Global Warming!Part 2: Founder of The Weather Channel Slams Global Warming! (Part 2)Part 3: Founder of The Weather Channel Slams Global Warming! (Part 3)Part 4: Founder of The Weather Channel Slams Global Warming! (Part 4)___________________________________________________________________________________The Last Time the Globe WarmedTry CuriosityStream today: http://curiositystream.com/eonsViewers like you help make PBS (Thank you 😃) . Support your local PBS Member Station here: PBS: DonateImagine an enormous, lush rainforest teeming with life...in the Arctic. Well there was a time -- and not too long ago -- when the world warmed more than any human has ever seen. (So far)Produced in collaboration with PBS Digital Studios: http://youtube.com/pbsdigitalstudios.comSpecial thanks to Nobumichi Tamura for allowing us to use his work:SpinopsWant to follow Eons elsewhere on the internet?Facebook - Log In or Sign Up to ViewTwitter - Eons (@EonsShow) | TwitterInstagram - Eons (@eonsshow) • Instagram photos and videosReferences:CU Boulder TodayScience AdvancesGeology | GeoScienceWorldScience, health and medical journals, full-text articles and books.Science130 million publications on ResearchGateArchive of all online contenthttp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/https://www.e-education.psu.edu/earthNASA Earth Observatory - HomePalaeontology [online]http://www.nature.com/ngeo/journal/http://cdiac.ess-dive.lbl.gov/trends/Index of /FTPhttps://www.sciencealert.com/carbon-emergencyhttps://www.nature.com/ngeo/journal/https://ucsdnews.ucsd.edu/pressreleaseNASA Earth Observatory - Homehttp://www.ei.lehigh.edu/eli/cc/resourcehttp://people.earth.yale.edu/paleocenaneThomas Kammer, West Virginia UniversityEocenehttp://all-geo.org/highlyallochthonou...http://academic.evergreen.edu/z/zita/...http://naturalhistory.si.edu/ete/ETE_...https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/arti...National Geographic Magazine...Science, health and medical journals, full-text articles and books....https://www.livescience.com/15597-pri...https://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...http://electronic-earth.net/3/19/2008...The Geological Society of London...https://www.nature.com/articles/ngeo1...http://www.whoi.edu/fileserver.do?id=...Caption authors (Spanish)Juan de Dios Ayala GonzálezMariana Sánchez TapiaRodrigo Valenzuela ShawcroftCategory: Science & Technology___________________________________________________________________________________Is an Ice Age Coming? | Space Time | PBS Digital Studios2,894,274 views•Published on May 25, 2016Spoiler: no (and climate change has nothing to do with this).Get your own Space Time t­shirt at http://bit.ly/1QlzoBiTweet at us! @pbsspacetimeFacebook: PBS SpaceTimeEmail us! [email protected] on Reddit: PBS Space Time • r/pbsspacetimeSupport us on Patreon! PBS Space Time is creating Astrophysics Videos | PatreonHelp translate our videos! http://www.youtube.com/timedtext_cs_p...We’re living in a brief window of time where our planet isn’t frozen underneath a giant layer of glaciers. How much longer will the moderate climate that we’ve come to know as “normal” continue? What causes these dramatic shifts in temperature that thaw our planet and then throw it back into a state of deep freeze? This episode looks at how the changes in our planet’s orbit and rotation impacts our climate.Written and hosted by Matt O’DowdMade by Kornhaber Brown (Home | kornhaberbrown)Comments: 4798alexander4798Ryan LidsterPhysics Videos by Eugene KhutoryanskyOther Links:Physics Girl: Is Energy Always Conserved?PBS Idea Channel: Is Math a Feature of the Universe or a Feature of Human Creation?Caption authors (Turkish)Uzak EvrenlerMelih Rustu CALIKOGLUCategory: Education___________________________________________________________________________________How Volcanoes Froze the Earth (Twice)675,313 views•Published on Jul 17, 2019Over 600 million years ago, sheets of ice coated our planet on both land and sea. How did this happen? And most importantly for us, why did the planet eventually thaw again? The evidence for Snowball Earth is written on every continent today.Thanks to Julio Lacerda and Franz Anthony from Studio 252mya for their wonderful illustrations. You can find more of their work here: Studio 252MYASpecial thanks to Judy Pu for answering our questions about Snowball Earth.Produced in collaboration with PBS Digital Studios: PBS Digital StudiosSuper special thanks to the following Patreon patrons for helping make Eons possible:Katie Fichtner, Anthony Callaghan, MissyElliottSmith, The Scintillating Spencer, AA, Zachary Spencer, Stefan Weber, Ilya Murashov, Charles Kahle, Robert Amling, Po Foon Kwong, Larry Wilson, Merri Snaidman, John Vanek, Neil H. Gray, Esmeralda Rupp-Spangle, Gregory Donovan, الخليفي سلطان, Gabriel Cortez, Marcus Lejon, Robert Arévalo, Robert Hill, Todd Dittman, Betsy Radley, PS, Philip Slingerland, Jose Garcia, Eric Vonk, Tony Wamsley, Henrik Peteri, Jonathan Wright, Jon Monteiro, James Bording, Brad Nicholls, Miles Chaston, Michael McClellan, Jeff Graham, Maria Humphrey, Nathan Paskett, Connor Jensen, Daisuke Goto, Hubert Rady, Gregory Kintz, Tyson Cleary, Chandler Bass, Joao Ascensao, Tsee Lee, Sarah Fritts, Alex Yan.If you'd like to support the channel, head over to http://patreon.com/eons, and pledge for some cool rewards!Want to follow Eons elsewhere on the internet?Facebook - Log In or Sign Up to ViewTwitter - Eons (@EonsShow) | TwitterInstagram - Eons (@eonsshow) • Instagram photos and videosReferences: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1d...Category: Science & Technology___________________________________________________________________________________The Power of Volcanoes Pt. 1: Years without Summer | Full Documentary1,009,637 views•Published on Jun 3, 2017In the 6th century AD, large parts of the world were affected by mysterious weather events causing temperature drop, crop failures and famines. The series’ first episode analyzes how one single volcano probably caused “The Years Without Summer”, also known as Little Ice Age.The Power of Volcanoes Pt. 2: In the Shade of burning Mountains | Full Documentary702,558 views•Published on Jun 17, 2017Big Volcanic eruptions are very rare compared to the duration of human life. Only indications of passed catastrophes can give us a clue what could happen in the future. An epidemic in Europe, Sulphur sediments found in the ice of Greenland and a forever disappeared nation – could a volcano connect all these things? Scientists reconstruct passed catastrophes and explain the power of the stone giants.Category: Science & Technology___________________________________________________________________________________How Much Does the Sun Affect Earth's Climate?90,045 views•Published on Jul 10, 2018The sun is obviously a big factor in the earth's weather, but changes in the solar cycle don't always affect our climate in straightforward ways.Host: Caitlin HofmeisterFor special, curated artifacts of this universe, check out https://scishowfinds.com/Support SciShow by becoming a patron on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/scishowDooblydoo thanks go to the following Patreon supporters:Lazarus G, Sam Lutfi, Nicholas Smith, D.A. Noe, سلطان الخليفي, Piya Shedden, KatieMarie Magnone, Scott Satovsky Jr, Charles Southerland, Patrick D. Ashmore, Tim Curwick, Charles George, Kevin Bealer, Chris Peters. Like SciShow? Want to help support us, and also get things to put on your walls, cover your torso and hold your liquids? Check out our awesome products over at DFTBA Records: http://dftba.com/scishowLooking for SciShow elsewhere on the internet?Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/scishowTwitter: http://www.twitter.com/scishowTumblr: http://scishow.tumblr.comInstagram: http://instagram.com/thescishowSources:https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/no...https://arxiv.org/pdf/1204.4449.pdfhttps://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.c...https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/su...https://www.giss.nasa.gov/research/br...https://www.ucsusa.org/global-warming...https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Fea...https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/e...https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/global-warm...http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/1...https://phys.org/news/2017-03-sun-imp...https://www.scientificamerican.com/ar...https://www.space.com/19280-solar-act...http://science.sciencemag.org/content...http://faculty.wcas.northwestern.edu/...Images:https://www.istockphoto.com/vector/tr...https://www.istockphoto.com/vector/th...https://images.nasa.gov/details-GSFC_...https://www.videoblocks.com/video/sno...https://www.istockphoto.com/vector/wi...https://images.nasa.gov/details-PIA18...https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/10804https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/4551https://www.istockphoto.com/vector/ea...Category: Education___________________________________________________________________________________Solar Variability and Climate - Joanna D. Haigh11,385 views•Published on Jul 12, 2017Serious Science - http://serious-science.orgJoanna D. Haigh on the ‘little ice age’, solar radiation, and global warminghttp://serious-science.org/solar-vari...Category: Science & Technology___________________________________________________________________________________Dan Britt - Orbits and Ice Ages: The History of ClimateDr. Britt does a fantastic job at explaining how the earth’s non-linear orbits around the sun, the swinging magnetic poles, the oscillating spin, and planetary ocean heating and cooling cycles, and the solar cycles are all major factors in normal climate change.However, in the last 1/3 of the film, Dr. Britt does jump on liberal bandwagon, blaming human use of agriculture and fossil fuels as the major contributors of higher CO2 and Methane releases as the reason for the delayed normal galactical formation into the next Ice Age.330,564 views•Published on Feb 8, 2012Another lecture in IHMC's award-winning lecture series. http://www.ihmc.usClimate change has become a major political issue, but few understand how climate has changed in the past and the forces that drive climate. Most people don't know that fifty million years ago there were breadfruit trees and crocodiles on the shores of the Arctic Ocean, or that 18,000 years ago there was a mile-thick glacier on Manhattan and a continuous belt of winter sea ice extending south to Cape Hatteras. The History of Climate provides the context of our current climate debate and fundamental insight into how the climate works.Dr. Daniel Britt is a Professor of Astronomy and Planetary Sciences at the Department of Physics, University of Central Florida. He was educated at the University of Washington and Brown University, receiving a Ph.D. from Brown in 1991. He has had a varied career including service in the US Air Force as an ICBM missile launch officer and an economist for Boeing before going into planetary sciences. He has served on the science teams of two NASA missions, Mars Pathfinder and Deep Space 1. He was the project manager for the camera on Mars Pathfinder and has built hardware for all the NASA Mars landers.Britt currently does research on the physical properties and mineralogy of asteroids, comets, the Moon, and Mars under several NASA grants. Honors include 5 NASA Achievement Awards, election as a Fellow of the Meteoritical Society, and an asteroid named after him; 4395 Dan Britt. He is currently President of the Division for Planetary Sciences of the American Astronomical Society. He lives in Orlando with his wife, Judith. They have two sons, ages 16 and 21.Category: Science & Technology___________________________________________________________________________________Princeton's William Happer rebuts myth of carbon pollution128,059 viewsDr. William Happer, professor of physics at Princeton University, summarizes his arguments about the myth of carbon pollution. It's that myth that underlies global warming alarmists' key arguments. Happer offered these comments during a Sept. 8, 2014, speech for the John Locke Foundation's Shaftesbury Society.Category: News & Politics___________________________________________________________________________________Global Warming: Fact or Fiction? Featuring Physicists Willie Soon and Elliott Bloom241,166 views•Published on Aug 16, 2019Is global warming real? Have any such predictions been established scientifically? Would massive “carbon” taxes and other controls put America and the world—especially the poor—at great risk? “Especially the “Green New Deal” will have a catastrophic financial effect on all nations, especially with the poverty and working class peoples.”At this special event, a geoscientist and astrophysicist Willie Soon separates fact from fiction in the global warming debate. He explains why the forecasts from CO2 climate models have been so wrong—and why solar influences on clouds, oceans, and wind drive climate change, not CO2 emissions. Stanford University physicist Elliott Bloom then comments.“The whole point of science is to question accepted dogmas. For that reason, I respect Willie Soon as a good scientist and a courageous citizen.”—Freeman J. Dyson, Professor Emeritus of Physics, Institute for Advanced Study; Templeton Prize Laureate“I am writing to express my deep admiration and respect for Dr. Willie Soon, a fine astrophysicist and human being... As Willie has shown in many ways, observational facts do not fit the CO2 dogma, and an enormous amount of evidence points to the Sun as a much more important driver of climate... Willie was right—whatever the cause of changing temperature, the main driver cannot be the concentration of atmospheric CO2.”—William Happer, Chairman, Presidential Committee on Climate Security; Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Emeritus, Princeton University; Member, National Academy of SciencesWillie Soon is a geophysicist at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. He received his Ph.D. (with distinction) in aeronautical engineering from the University of Southern California, and he has been Astronomer at the Mount Wilson Observatory; Senior Scientist at the George C. Marshall Institute; Senior Visiting Fellow at the State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science at Xiamen University; and Professor of Environmental Studies at the University of Putra Malaysia. The author of 90 scientific papers, he has IEEE received the Nuclear & Plasma Sciences Society Award, Rockwell Dennis Hunt Award, Smithsonian Institution Award, Courage in Defense of Science Award, Petr Beckmann Award for Courage and Achievement in Defense of Scientific Truth and Freedom, and Frederick Seitz Memorial Award.Elliott D. Bloom is Professor Emeritus in the Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Laboratory (SLAC) at Stanford University and a Fellow of the American Physical Society. He was a member of the SLAC team with Jerome I. Friedman, Henry W. Kendall and Richard E. Taylor who received the Nobel Prize in Physics. He received his Ph.D. in physics from the California Institute of Technology, he is the author of numerous scientific papers, and he is the recipient of the Senior Scientist Award from the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation.For further information on and to order copies of the Independent Institute book, "Hot Talk, Cold Science: Global Warming's Unfinished Debate," by geophysicist S. Fred Singer, please go here:http://www.independent.org/store/book...The Independent Institute is a non-profit, non-partisan, public-policy research and educational organization that shapes ideas into profound and lasting impact. The mission of Independent is to advance peaceful, prosperous boldly, and free societies grounded in a commitment to human worth and dignity. Applying independent thinking to issues that matter, the Independent Institute creates transformational ideas for today’s most pressing social and economic challenges. The results of this work are published as books, the quarterly journal, "The Independent Review," and other publications and form the basis for numerous conference and media programs. By connecting these ideas with other organizations and networks, Independent seeks to inspire action that can unleash an era of unparalleled human flourishing at home and around the globe.Independent Institute:http://www.independent.org/“The Independent Review: A Journal of Political Economy” (Quarterly Journal):http://www.independent.org/publicatio...Independent Institute Books:http://www.independent.org/store/inde...FREE Email Updates from the Independent Institute:http://www.independent.org/register/s...Become a Member of the Independent Institute and receive a FREE gift:https://secure.independent.org/donate/Category: Education___________________________________________________________________________________A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to Global Warming717,286 views•Published on Nov 11, 2014Steven F. Hayward, Pepperdine UniversityThis lecture is part of Hillsdale College's 2014 CCA series. To learn more about Hillsdale College and the CCA programs, visit http://www.hillsdale.edu/outreach/ccaCategory: EducationCreated using YouTube Video EditorSource videos View attributions___________________________________________________________________________________Climate Change Reconsidered: Science the U.N. Will Exclude from Its Next Climate Report54,486 views•Published on Sep 24, 2013"Climate Change Reconsidered II: Physical Science" -- produced by a team of 40 scientists -- is the newest volume in the Climate Change Reconsidered series produced by The Heartland Institute and members of the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change (NIPCC). As in previous reports, thousands of peer-reviewed articles are cited to determine the current state-of-the-art of climate science. This newest volume's findings challenge the alarmist reports of the United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), whose next report is due out later this month. NIPCC authors paid special attention to contributions that were overlooked by the IPCC or that presented data, discussion, or implications, arguing against the IPCC's claim that dangerous global warming is occurring, or will occur, from human-related greenhouse gas emissions.Category: News & Politics___________________________________________________________________________________Dr Willie Soon demolishes the extreme weather panic and other hysterical arguments20,701 views•Published on Aug 23, 2019Extract, taken from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1zrej...Dr. Willie Soon covers a range of issues including extreme weather, climate models, and possible alternative explanations for the observed variation.For more info, see http://swarnabharat.in/climateCategory: News & Politics___________________________________________________________________________________These are just a handful of the dozens of videos and pieces of science-based information which can be used to COMPLETELY DESTROY the PARIS “Climate Change” and the “Global Warming” conspiracy theories. These are the scientists who have proven, Al Gore is a LIAR!Please, think before simply believing everything the mainstream news media keeps cramming into your cranium. The US mainstream news media and US social media platforms are all corporately owned, professional spin doctors. The news anchors all look similar to the over-dressed Hunger Games Hosts or Sleazy Televangelists strutting around in their glitzy glammed up studios. All of the US mainstream news media and social media are purely ultra-leftists biased, special interest groups influenced, completely funded by ultra-wealthy multi-billionaire and muti-trillionaire families.Remember, the US mainstream news media and US social media platforms are completely compliant and subservient to the Globalist agenda of the CIA, NSA, MI5, and Mossad. The news media and social media news are only allowed to crank out the Globalist filth through Operation Mockingbird, the CIA, NSA, MI5, and Mossad Global news media control network. The big problem is, now that Operation Mockingbird has been “outed” the CIA, NSA, MI5, and Mossad has begun to use other more sophisticated covert mainstream news media manipulation operations, entertainment industry manipulation operations, and social media manipulation operations. These newer and more sophisticated covert mainstream news media manipulation operations, covert entertainment industry manipulation operations, and covert social media manipulation operations are specifically designed to “feed” directly to the global populations only the information, entertainment, and social media interaction they (CIA, NSA, MI5, Mossad) have chosen for the US, UK, EU, Israel, and basically the majority of the world’s populations to read, hear, see, and believe. If you doubt me, go ahead and click on these links, read for yourself, these credible news networks, who are now reporting on Operation Mockingbird, after a blizzard of Freedom of Information Act applications were filed by US Citizens, UK Citizens, French Citizens, German Citizens, Russian Citizens, Canadian Citizens, Italian Citizens, Australian Citizens, and Israeli Citizens. Operation Mockingbird | Operation, Outcome, Facts & Summary Notes // User Clip: Operation Mockingbird exposed on C-Span // Underground Knowledge - A discussion group / Carl Bernstein // Operation Mockingbird: New York Times confesses to role in subverting First AmendmentProject Echelon is the CIA, NSA, MI5, and Mossad information and intelligence gathering program to sweep up all telecommunications, cellular, internet, social media, cable television subscriptions, cable television viewing habits, satellite television subscriptions, satellite television viewing habits, law enforcement fire-rescue and ambulance radio communications and location tracking, CB radio communications and location tracking, HAM radio communications and location tracking, all other electronic communications and location tracking. Ex-Snoop Confirms Echelon NetworkProject Nightingale is the CIA, NSA, MI5, and Mossad mission to collect, store, and constantly update DNA samples and detailed health information on as many people around the globe as they can. Fortunately, one of their front companies, Google, got caught collecting detailed health information on US Citizens. WSJ News Exclusive | Google’s ‘Project Nightingale’ Triggers Federal InquirySome of these videos are frequently deleted from YouTube, then resubmitted in an edited format, until the college or original posting educational program files a civil suit against YouTube. YouTube then relents and allows the original video and presentation to be posted in an unedited format.Might the actions of YouTube clue you into the political camp YouTube chooses to side with? It would seem the ultra-liberal camp has taken a firm hold of YouTube. YouTube’s ultra-liberal self-appointed sensors, at will, sensors the substance of all videos, comments, accounts, and users on YouTube, without any oversite. The sad thing is, these videos are available some days, gone or highly edited a few days, then back on a few days later.Respectfully,Randy Jay Pine

It is a wonderful article. It s a good read.Business ImpactTechnology and InequalityThe disparity between the rich and everyone else is larger than ever in the United States and increasing in much of Europe. Why?by David RotmanOctober 21, 2014Income inequality hinders economic opportunity and innovation.The signs of the gap—really, a chasm—between the poor and the super-rich are hard to miss in Silicon Valley. On a bustling morning in downtown Palo Alto, the center of today’s technology boom, apparently homeless people and their meager belongings occupy almost every available public bench. Twenty minutes away in San Jose, the largest city in the Valley, a camp of homeless people known as the Jungle—reputed to be the largest in the country—has taken root along a creek within walking distance of Adobe’s headquarters and the gleaming, ultramodern city hall.The homeless are the most visible signs of poverty in the region. But the numbers back up first impressions. Median income in Silicon Valley reached $94,000 in 2013, far above the national median of around $53,000. Yet an estimated 31 percent of jobs pay $16 per hour or less, below what is needed to support a family in an area with notoriously expensive housing. The poverty rate in Santa Clara County, the heart of Silicon Valley, is around 19 percent, according to calculations that factor in the high cost of living.Even some of the area’s biggest technology boosters are appalled. “You have people begging in the street on University Avenue [Palo Alto’s main street],” says Vivek Wadhwa, a fellow at Stanford University’s Rock Center for Corporate Governance and at Singularity University, an education corporation in Moffett Field with ties to the elites in Silicon Valley. “It’s like what you see in India,” adds Wadhwa, who was born in Delhi. “Silicon Valley is a look at the future we’re creating, and it’s really disturbing.” Many of those made rich by the recent technology boom, he adds, don’t seem to care about “the mess they’re creating.”The wealth generated in Silicon Valley is “as prodigious as it has ever been,” says Russell Hancock, president of Joint Venture Silicon Valley, a nonprofit group that promotes regional development. “But when we used to have booms in the tech sector, it would lift all boats. That’s not how it works anymore. And suddenly you’re seeing a backlash and people are upset.” Indeed, people are stoning buses transporting Google employees to work from their homes in San Francisco.The anger in Northern California and elsewhere in the United States springs from an increasingly obvious reality: the rich are getting richer while many other people are struggling. It’s hard not to wonder whether Silicon Valley, rather than just exemplifying this growing inequality, is actually contributing to it, by producing digital technologies that eliminate the need for many middle-class jobs. Here, technology is arguably evolving faster than anywhere else in the world. Does the region really portend a future, as Wadhwa would have it, in which a few very rich people leave the rest of us hopelessly behind?The desire to understand why inequality seems to be reaching such troubling levels no doubt accounts for the remarkable success this year of the French academic economist Thomas Piketty’s Capital in the Twenty-First Century, which its publisher sold out soon after its initial publication. With its multitude of equations, its references to the Belle Époque and Ancien Régime, and a title that harks back to Karl Marx and the politics of the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the 700-page tome seemed an unlikely candidate for popular reading. Yet it quickly rose to the top of best-seller lists this spring and remained on them for months.Economists have long warned that inflation-adjusted wages for low- and middle-income workers have been flat or declining since the late 1970s in the United States, even as its economy has grown. Piketty, a professor at the Paris School of Economics, greatly expands on this idea, documenting the exploding wealth of the very rich in the United States and Europe and comparing the trend with developments over the last few centuries. Building on research conducted with his colleagues Emmanuel Saez, a professor at the University of California, Berkeley, and Anthony Atkinson, an economist at the University of Oxford, Piketty collected and analyzed data, including tax records, to show just how extreme the disparity in wealth between the rich and the rest of the population has grown. (The story necessarily revolves around the United States, France, and several other European countries in which such historical data are available.)The gap between the wealthy and everyone else is largest in the United States. The richest 1 percent of the population has 34 percent of the accumulated wealth; the top 0.1 percent has some 15 percent.The gap between the wealthy and everyone else is largest in the United States. In 2010, the richest 1 percent of the population had 34 percent of the accumulated wealth; the top 0.1 percent had some 15 percent. And the inequality has only gotten worse since the last recession ended: the top 1 percent captured 95 percent of income growth from 2009 to 2012, if capital gains are included.The top 10 percent now accounts for 48 percent of national income; the top 1 percent makes almost 20 percent and the top 0.1 makes nearly 9 percent. The disparity in the portion of income earned from work—what economists call labor income—is particularly striking. Wage inequality in the United States is “probably higher than in any other society at any time in the past, anywhere in the world,” writes Piketty.Why is this going on? Piketty attributes it in part to unjustifiably large salaries for people he calls “supermanagers.” About 70 percent of the top 0.1 percent of earners are corporate executives, by his calculations. “The standard explanation for rising inequality is the race between the demand and the supply for high skills,” he told me. “I think that this is an important part of the overall explanation. But this is not all. In order to explain why rising inequality has been so strong at the very top in the U.S., one needs more than a skill-based explanation.” Piketty points to “pay-setting institutions and corporate governance” as factors. He adds, “Above a certain level, it is very hard to find in the data any link between pay and performance.”In Britain and France the overall rise of inequality is less dramatic, but in those countries something else is happening that could be even more worrisome: accumulated wealth, much of it inherited, is returning to relative levels not seen since before the First World War. Privately held wealth in some European countries is now about 500 to 600 percent of annual national income, a level approaching that of the early 1900s.What particularly worries Piketty is the long-term effect of this concentration of wealth. A central point of his book is the simple statement r > g, where r is the average return on capital and g is the economic growth rate. When the rate of return on capital exceeds the growth rate (which he says is what happened until the beginning of the 20th century and is likely to happen again as growth slows), then the money that rich people make from their wealth piles up while wages rise more slowly if at all.The implications of this should be frightening for anyone who believes in a merit-based system. It means we are in danger of entering into an era that, like the 19th century in France and England, is socially and politically dominated by those with vast amounts of inherited wealth. Piketty describes it as the world of Jane Austen, in which people’s lives and fates are determined by their inheritance and not their talents or professional achievements.As Piketty points out, it is a radical departure from how we have thought about progress. Since the 1950s, economics has been dominated by the idea—notably formulated by Simon Kuznets, a Harvard economist and Nobel laureate—that inequality diminishes as countries become more technologically developed and more people are able to take advantage of the resulting opportunities. Many of us suppose that our talents, skills, training, and acumen will allow us to prosper; it is what economists like to call “human capital.” But the belief that technological progress will lead to “the triumph of human capital over financial capital and real estate, capable managers over fat cat stockholders, and skill over nepotism” is, writes Piketty, “largely illusory.”Not all economists are so pessimistic; in fact, g has been higher than r for most of the 20th century and continues to be so. Nonetheless, Piketty’s book is important because of the way he has clarified the magnitude of the problem and its dangers. And he has done so at a time of increasing soul-searching about the role technology plays in exacerbating inequality. “It just seems so obvious to me [that] technology is accelerating the rich-poor gap,” says Steve Jurvetson, a venture capitalist at DFJ Venture in Menlo Park, California. In many discussions with his peers in the high-tech community, he says, it has been “the elephant in the room, stomping around, banging off the walls.”Still, as Piketty’s lengthy analysis suggests, the explanation for the rise in inequality is not a simple one. Specifically, the role technology is playing is complex—and contested.Racing Ahead“My reading of the data is that technology is the main driver of the recent increases in inequality. It’s the biggest factor,” says Erik Brynjolfsson, a professor of management at MIT’s Sloan School. The coauthor, with fellow MIT academic Andrew McAfee, of The Second Machine Age, Brynjolfsson, like Piketty, has recently gained unlikely prominence for an academic economist.Piketty and Brynjolfsson both earned their degrees in the early 1990s, and both were professors at MIT during the following years. But beyond an agreement that growing inequality is a problem, their thinking could hardly be more different. While Piketty’s writing is sprinkled with references to Jane Austen and Honoré de Balzac, Brynjolfsson talks of advanced robots and the vast potential of artificial intelligence. While Piketty warns against a return to a world where inherited wealth determines social and political fates, Brynjolfsson worries that a growing share of the workforce could be left behind even as digital technologies increase overall income.Central to Brynjolfsson’s argument is the idea that innovation is rapidly accelerating as trends in computing and networking advance at an exponential rate. Largely as a result of these advances, productivity and GDP continue to increase. But while “the pie is increasing,” he says, not everyone is benefiting. (Brynjolfsson notes that productivity has, according to conventional measurements, grown slowly since around 2005. But he attributes that “disappointing” slowdown to the recession and its aftermath—and, perhaps most important, to the fact that organizations have yet to fully capture the benefits expected to come from digital technologies.)The biggest factor is that the technology-driven economy greatly favors a small group of successful individuals by amplifying their talent and luck.Brynjolfsson lists several ways that technological changes can contribute to inequality: robots and automation, for example, are eliminating some routine jobs while requiring new skills in others (see “How Technology is Destroying Jobs”). But the biggest factor, he says, is that the technology-driven economy greatly favors a small group of successful individuals by amplifying their talent and luck, and dramatically increasing their rewards.Brynjolfsson argues that these people are benefiting from a winner-take-all effect originally described by Sherwin Rosen in a 1981 paper called “The Economics of Superstars.” Rosen said that such breakthroughs as motion pictures, radio, and TV had greatly broadened the audiences—and hence the rewards—for those in show business and sports. Thirty years later, Brynjolfsson sees a similar effect for high-tech entrepreneurs, whose ideas and products can be widely distributed and produced thanks to software and other digital technologies. Why hire a local tax consultant when you can use a cheap, state-of-the-art program that is constantly being updated and refined? Likewise, why buy a second-best program or app? The ability to copy software and distribute digital products anywhere means customers will buy the top one. Why use a search engine that is almost as good as Google? Such economic logic now rules a growing share of the marketplace; it is, according to Brynjolfsson, an increasingly important reason why a few entrepreneurs, including the founders of such startups as Instagram, are growing rich at a staggering rate.The distinction between Piketty’s supermanagers and Brynjolfsson’s superstars is critical: the latter derive their high incomes directly from the effects of technology. As machines increasingly substitute for labor and building a business becomes less capital-intensive—you don’t need a printing plant to produce an online news site, or large investments to create an app—the biggest economic winners will not be those owning conventional capital but, instead, those with the ideas behind innovative new products and successful business models.In an article called “New World Order,” published this summer in Foreign Affairs, Brynjolfsson, McAfee, and Michael Spence, a Nobel laureate and professor at New York University, argued that “superstar-based technical change … is upending the global economy.” That economy, they conclude, will increasingly be dominated by members of the small elite that “innovate and create.”Stay in SchoolThe exploding wealth of the very rich is only one part of the story of inequality. For much of the population, incomes have stagnated or even shrunk, and technology is one of the leading culprits. Simply put, as we getter better at automating routine tasks, the people who benefit most are those with the expertise and creativity to use these advances. And that drives income inequality: demand for highly skilled workers rises, while workers with less education and expertise fall behind.Though income growth among the top 1 percent is an important phenomenon, says David Autor, an MIT economist, the disparity in skills and education among the other 99 percent is “a big deal, a much bigger deal.” The gap between median earnings for people with a high school diploma and those with a college degree was $17,411 for men and $12,887 for women in 1979; by 2012 it had risen to $34,969 and $23,280. Education, Autor says, “is the most powerful thing you can do to affect lifetime earnings.”In the United States, this education premium began rising steeply in the late 1970s, when the surge of college entrants dramatically slowed and the availability of high-skill workers consequently dwindled. More recent decades have seen an additional twist. Automation and digital technologies have reduced the need for many production, sales, administrative, and clerical jobs, while demand has increased for low-pay jobs that can’t be automated, such as those in cleaning services and restaurants. The result has been what Autor describes as a “barbell-shaped” job market, with strong demand at the high and low ends and a “hollowing out” of the middle. And despite the increase in demand for workers in service jobs, there is an ample supply of people who need the work and can do these tasks. Hence wages for these jobs dropped throughout much of the 2000s, further worsening income inequality.Autor, for one, is skeptical of Brynjolfsson and McAfee’s argument that the transformation of work is speeding up as technological change accelerates. Research he conducted with a fellow MIT economist, Daron Acemoglu, suggests that productivity growth is not in fact accelerating, nor is such growth concentrated in computer-intensive sectors. According to Autor, the changes wrought by digital technologies are transforming the economy, but the pace of that change is not necessarily increasing. He says that’s because progress in robotics, artificial intelligence, and such high-profile technologies as Google’s driverless car are happening more slowly than some people may think. Despite impressive anecdotal accounts, these technologies are not ready for widespread use. “You would be actually pretty hard pressed to find a robot in your day-to-day life,” he observes.Indeed, Autor believes many tasks that people are particularly good at, such as recognizing objects and dealing with suddenly changing environments, will remain difficult or expensive to automate for decades to come. The implications for inequality are significant: it could mean that the market for middle-skill jobs may be stabilizing and the earning disparity between low- and high-skill jobs leveling off, albeit “at a very high level.” What’s more, many middle-skill workers could flourish as they increasingly learn to use digital technologies in their jobs.It’s an unusual spot of optimism in the inequality discussion. But the underlying problem for much of the population remains. “We have a very skill-driven economy without a very skilled workforce,” Autor says. “If you have the high skills—and that’s a big if—you can make a fortune.”Silicon ValleyIn his quiet suite in a large office building in downtown San Jose, Joint Venture president Russell Hancock seems impatient when asked about inequality in the region. “I have more questions than answers. I can’t explain it. I can’t tell you how to fix it,” he begins abruptly. “We used to be a classic middle-class economy. But that’s all gone. There’s no longer a middle class. The economy is bifurcated and there’s nothing in the middle.”He blames globalization for wiping out the semiconductor industry and other high-tech manufacturing that once prospered in the region, as well as changes in technology that have eliminated well-paid jobs in administration and other support services. “There used to be a ladder to get into the middle class, and some sense of mobility,” Hancock says. But that ladder, he says, is gone: “It didn’t happen suddenly, but in 2014 everyone has woken up to it.”Though California’s economy—the world’s eighth-largest—is strong in many sectors, the state has the highest poverty rate in the country, if cost of living is factored in. The situation in Silicon Valley helps explain why. About 20 to 25 percent of the population works in the high-tech sector, and the wealth is concentrated among them. This relatively small but prosperous group is driving up the cost of housing, transportation, and other living expenses. At the same time, much of the employment growth in the area is happening in retail, restaurant, and manual jobs, where wages are stagnant or even declining. It’s a simple formula for income inequality and poverty. But the nature of technology itself seems to have made it worse. According to Chris Benner, a regional economist at the University of California, Davis, there has been no net increase in jobs in Silicon Valley since 1998; digital technologies inevitably mean you can generate billions of dollars from a low employment base.“There used to be a ladder to get into the middle class, and some sense of mobility,” Hancock says. But that ladder, he says, is gone: “It didn’t happen suddenly, but in 2014 everyone has woken up to it.”If economists are right that income inequality is fueled by disparities in skills and education, then the last chance for many people to find a route into the middle class may be in places like Foothill College. Sprawling across some of Silicon Valley’s most prized real estate in Los Altos Hills, the community college draws students from all over the region. Many come from its poorest areas, such as East Palo Alto and East San Jose. Ladder or no ladder, the college provides a fleeting opportunity for those students to at least get within striking distance of the elusive jobs in the “knowledge economy” that dominates the area.Judy Miner, president of Foothill, is justifiably proud of its accomplishments. Students routinely transfer to prestigious four-year colleges, including the University of California’s Berkeley and Santa Cruz campuses; as of a few years ago, 17 had gone on to MIT. But talented though some students are, Miner is also blunt about the challenges facing a school that proudly accepts “the top 100 percent of all applicants.” Foothill, like other community colleges, is playing catch-up with many students who aren’t academically prepared for universities. And, she says, one goal is to change their “worldview of where they fit in.”When she was growing up in San Francisco, Miner says, her achievements and aptitude opened the possibility of Harvard or Yale, but no one else in her family had gone to college, and she couldn’t imagine leaving home to do so. So she commuted on the bus to Lone Mountain College, a small Catholic school that has since closed. Now, at Foothill, she works with families and local communities to expand the ambitions of students from backgrounds like hers. “Piketty says the best predictor of access to universities is parents’ income,” says Miner. “In California, it’s the zip code.”A ribbon-cutting ceremony at East Palo Alto Academy is a poignant indication of how much needs to be done to close the zip-code divide. It’s a cloudless, hot day in late August, a reminder that the region was once prized land for orchards. A handful of new two-story concrete buildings surround a courtyard holding a smattering of enthusiastic administrators and a few teachers. It’s a relatively modest facility but, by all descriptions, a huge improvement over the cramped building the 13-year-old charter school occupied before.In a city whose only public high school was shut down in the 1970s (students were bused to neighboring district schools), East Palo Alto Academy represents a noteworthy attempt to address the educational needs of the local community. The school seems to be turning around the lives of many of its 300 students. But no one needs to be reminded that less than three miles down University Avenue is the campus of Palo Alto High, a public school with multiple tennis courts, a synthetic running track, and a multimillion-dollar media center complete with rows of new iMacs and state-of-the-art video equipment. Meanwhile, East Palo Alto Academy has only just gotten a properly equipped chemistry lab, with a fume hood and storage facilities for the chemicals. The athletic facilities are a newly paved outdoor basketball court whose rims, as one student excitedly points out, actually have nets.“One of the largest and most prominent debates in social sciences is the role of technology in inequality,” says David Grusky, director of Stanford’s Center on Poverty and Inequality. But “one fact that everyone agrees on,” he says, is that the income gaps between those with different levels of education “account for a good share of the inequality.” And, he says, “we know what the solution is. It’s equalizing access to high-quality education. The problem is that we just pay lip service to it.” The issue is not, as many suggest, the overall quality of education, he argues: “We have fine schools. For example, Palo Alto High School is a fine school. But everyone needs access to these types of schools. Everyone should have access to the kind of schools we routinely provide middle-class kids.” (Local governments, using property taxes, supply an average of 44 percent of the funding for elementary and secondary schools in the United States, helping to fuel the disparity in educational investments between poor and rich communities.)Perhaps technology is changing so quickly that people are slow to grasp which skills they might need, or don’t understand that the demand for skilled labor will only grow. “But I don’t think labor is that stupid,” says Grusky. “If you’re born into a poor neighborhood, you don’t have access to a high-quality preschool, a high-quality primary school, and a high-quality secondary school. And then you’re simply not in position to go to college.” If workers aren’t equipped to do the jobs that technology is creating, he says, “it’s because our institutions are failing us.”Dirty WordsUnderstanding what causes income inequality is important because different answers suggest very different policy solutions. If, as Piketty fears, the gap between the very rich and everyone else is partly due to unjustifiably high compensation for top executives and will only worsen with the seemingly inexorable shift of wealth to the already wealthy, then it makes sense to find ways to redistribute those gains through progressive tax policies. Piketty and his colleague Emmanuel Saez believe that the tax cuts made by Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan in the late 1970s and early 1980s jump-started the growth of income inequality seen today in Britain and the United States. Indeed, Piketty spends much of the last quarter of Capital outlining how increasingly progressive taxes, including a global wealth tax, could begin to close the economic gap.But at least in the United States, “redistribution” is a dirty word in almost any political setting. “If we know one thing,” says Robert Solow, a professor emeritus of economics at MIT, “it’s that redistributing income is not something we’re very good at.” And, he adds, “it’s not about to happen.”“Any decent person should find … extreme poverty coexisting in the same society with extreme wealth immoral.”Solow, a Nobel laureate who is one of the most influential economists of the last half-century, published a landmark paper in 1956 that transformed the way the profession views the critical role of technological progress in productivity and the growth of national wealth. Now 90, Solow published a lengthy and largely admiring review of Capital in The New Republic titled “Thomas Piketty Is Right,” acclaiming his “new and powerful” insight that if r > g holds, “the income and wealth of the rich will grow faster than the typical income from work.” However, Solow told me that the struggles of Americans with middle and lower incomes represent a very different phenomenon from the growth of the super-rich—and a far more worrisome one. “Any decent person should find having extreme poverty coexisting in the same society with extreme wealth immoral,” he says.The most obvious policy recommendations point to education, including, as social scientists are increasingly learning, pre-kindergarten and other early education programs. As Sean Reardon, a sociologist at Stanford, points out, differences in educational achievement are now associated more closely with family income than they are with factors that have been more important in the past, including race and ethnic background. And researchers have shown that those differences in achievement levels are already set by the time children enter kindergarten.Inequality in education is not only hurting the chances of poor children to get ahead, says David Grusky. It is also affecting the supply of high-skill labor. By stifling opportunities for countless talented individuals, it artificially restricts the potential pool of those with technological expertise. As a result, Grusky says, “we overpay for high-skill workers,” which is damaging to the economy. In other words, the lack of access to high-quality education is not just bad for the students in East Palo Alto; it is bad for the companies a few miles away in the world’s most concentrated center of technology innovation.Of course, a diagnosis is far from a cure, and a call to improve educational opportunities is far too facile—who could argue with that? The challenges inherent in this kind of change must be acknowledged, and previous efforts to accomplish it have failed. Providing everyone with access to quality education would require us to transform our schooling system and the way we pay for it. But if differences in educational achievement based on family incomes are really what’s driving inequality, Grusky worries, we can’t solve the problem by letting people who have privileged access to a good education reap the advantages and then taxing their resulting higher earnings. That, he says, is “an after-the-fact Band-Aid that doesn’t address the source of the problem.” It will also strike many as unfairly taking money from those who have earned it. If the goal is the “merit-based inequality” that results when everyone has a fair chance to compete, Grusky argues, then we must attempt to reform educational institutions.That’s why asking whether technology causes inequality is the wrong question. Instead, we should be asking how advancing technologies have changed the relative demand for high-skill and low-skill workers, and how well we are adapting to such changes. Surely, rapid advances in technology have exacerbated discrepancies in education and skills, and the rise of digital technologies could possibly be playing a part in creating an extreme elite of the very rich. But it makes no sense to blame technology, just as it makes no sense to blame the rich. It is our institutions, including but not only our schools, that need to change. The reforms that experts recommend are numerous and varied, ranging from a higher minimum wage to stronger job protections to modifications of our tax policy. And if Piketty is right about the supermanagers, we need improved corporate governance and oversight to more closely tie compensation to executive productivity.But a good place to start is by asking what the problem is and why we care. It is here that Piketty’s book is so valuable. In particular, it reminds us how an elite class of the super-rich can both warp our political process and erode our sense of fairness.In the technology industry where some of those elites are created, many will surely be left wondering whether the future looks more like Silicon Valley—a high-tech dynamo driving economic prosperity and wealth inequality at once—or, as Piketty would have it, more like France, increasingly dominated by inherited wealth. Is the creativity and productivity of places like Silicon Valley threatened by a future that favors the fortunes of the very rich over the ambitions of the many?What Role Does Technology Play in Record Levels of Income Inequality?