Calculator Order Form: Fill & Download for Free

Well, it also seems to me that eXcentral in general can be evaluated as a suitable option for such a format. In addition, CFD trading is really relevant for a large number of traders, because this is exactly where the understanding of trading and the market as a whole starts. And there are a lot of assets in this category, so you have every opportunity to deal with it all and be able to form a quality investment portfolio that you can use on a long-term basis. It's always a good solution and it allows you to act in a more structured, precise and targeted way in all circumstances.For this purpose, you can use live market reports or chart overviews (technical analysis), because this will help you find the hottest moments in the market and it is especially useful for those who can not yet act independently and actively. And here you always have some guidelines, and this always gives you additional stability. But still, you shouldn't blindly trust such things, you should learn to analyze it and find patterns between events. And this definitely takes time, and experience, of course.I would also like to point out that there are other tools in eXcentral that can be used to work. For example, I can mention the economic calendar and fundamental analysis reviews, because it expands your horizons and allows you to better understand all this huge flow of information. It's because of these things that I've learned to work not only with key currency pairs, but also with more exotic moments, because many of them "react" to the market particularly interesting. And it attracts me.Well, if you're having difficulties with calculations, then pay attention to the calculators. This is an interesting tool that became popular not so long ago. But I can say that it immediately had a positive impact on the work of some traders. And it can also be used in CFD trading to correctly size an order and correctly calculate the free margin. After all, it depends on this security in your work and your results. So do not ignore the opportunities you have and achieve your goals. And do not pay attention to the difficulties, all this is temporary...

Concerned? More like wetting their collective pants. Governments are fearful, pathetic things, mostly composed of individuals seeking to retain access to whatever powers their roles in office afford them. Imagine, for a moment, if a being such as Superman were to exist on our Earth.​He possesses steel-hard skin, making him impervious to all forms of normal harm. Only the most powerful weapons can even give him pause, if you were able to hit him in the first place.His physical strength has NO equal. No machine is stronger, few substances on Earth can resist his physical might for long. He has enhanced reflexes to go with that strength, capable of moving faster than the eye can follow.He is able to project heat rays from his eyes capable of melting tanks.A being who is blessed with the power of supersonic, unaided flight, both silent and capable of hovering at will. Requiring no fuel, never needing to rest.His senses rival that of the most sophisticated information gathering technology on the planet. He can hear a pin drop, half a world away. No conversation is safe. Few rooms could be made completely proof against his power. He can see through walls and hear radio waves. He is a tireless information gathering platform with super-intellect.And given his mental abilities, he can learn to speak every language on Earth, memorize most physical and educational abilities. He can learn whatever he wants, whenever he wants to. He could play the stock market and calculate what the most likely returns would be.Everything I have mentioned assumes he would be honest and forthright with his powers. Using his powers in a less scrupulous manner he could be a thousand times more dangerous.Ask yourself what government would not quake in their boots given their levels of underhanded, questionable behavior taking place every day, concessions to graft, corruption and political business as usual.Do you suppose the appearance of an incorruptible, alien from another world would be welcome, especially if he decided he was going to enforce what he thought of as law and order?Would he be welcome? Would his ability to destabilize economies by bringing resources to everyone who needed them be wanted?What if he didn't like the war in the Ukraine or in the Middle East and decided to STOP it? Would any nation like this intrusion into their national sovereignty? Unlikely.Most governments would expend every effort doing two things: finding out who he was and where he lived. Then they would do everything in their power to kill him, benevolent or not.Their fear of what he would discover and what he might tell to the public, thus challenging their secular, economic power, would make keeping their secrets and getting rid of him their top priority.THE DEO: The DC Universe answers this quandary with the Department of Extranormal Operations.​The Department of Extranormal Operations (or DEO) is a fictional government agencyin the DC Universe appearing in several comic books published by DC Comics. It was co-created by Dan Curtis Johnson and J. H. Williams III and first appeared in Batman#550 (1998). The agency was the focus of the Chase series.The role of the DEO is to monitor those with superpowers and to prevent any threat to the general public.The DEO keeps dossiers on every metahuman known to the public and many private citizens who have even minor metahuman abilities. The head of the DEO is Mister Bones and its most famous operative is Agent Cameron Chase.​Think of the DEO as the spy agency's idea of what a well-funded super-spy agency would look like. They use the most advanced technology on Earth (and a number from other planets as well, captured from incursions from alien invasions and the like.)If Mister Bones had his way, most metahumans would be pushing up daisies, but the threat of alien invasion or spontaneous metahuman development means keeping metas alive who are powerful and have at least a sense of responsibility alive and available to protect humanity.But he doesn't have to like it.SHIELD AND SWORD: Marvel's answer to dealing with metahuman threats, foreign, domestic and alien.S.H.I.E.L.D. is a fictional espionage, law-enforcement, and counter-terrorism agency in the Marvel Comics Universe. Created by Stan Lee and Jack Kirby in Strange Tales #135 (Aug. 1965), it often deals with paranormal and superhuman threats.The acronym originally stood for Supreme Headquarters, International Espionage, Law-Enforcement Division. It was changed in 1991 to Strategic Hazard Intervention Espionage Logistics Directorate. Within the various films set in the Marvel Cinematic Universe, as well as multiple animated and live-action television series, the acronym stands for Strategic Homeland Intervention, Enforcement and Logistics Division.And the alternative for space-based alien intervention services…S.W.O.R.D. (Sentient World Observation and Response Department) is a fictional counterterrorism and intelligence agency in the Marvel Comics Universe. Its purpose is to deal with extraterrestrial threats to world security.The Marvel Universe's solution is SHIELD for local terrestrial threats and SWORD for the monitoring against alien invasion and other threats from space.Unlike the DC Universe's relatively recent development of the DEO, SHIELD has existed since the sixties as a super-spy agency monitoring other technology groups engaged in super-science, espionage and world conquest, such as HYDRA and Advanced Idea Mechanics.The leadership of SHIELD has rotated with its most famous director and notorious spy/soldier, Nicolas Fury, most often at the helm.On our Earth, there would be infighting...​Every intelligence agency in the United States (see above) and possibly on Earth would want a crack at these metahuman beings who are capable of flaunting the laws of man as easily as they flaunted the laws of physics.It is likely they would create one larger agency comprised of elements of these sixteen, where they would gather information and then assess the threat posed by each metahuman.Metahumans would be studied from afar whenever possible, scenes where they battle would be screened for visual, auditory and forensic evidence by said collective agency using the best agents, operatives and scientists money can buy.As information regarding these beings was gathered, reverse-engineering would be the inevitable result of study. If it were possible to create our own metahumans, they would be at the heart of the greatest arms race the world has ever known.And last, the Xavier Protocols or Batman's Justice League Protocols guidelines for observing, tracking, threatening and neutralizing said metahumans would be put together and resources collected and tested as best they could to determine their viability and efficacy.The Xavier Protocols are a set of doomsday plans created by Charles Xavier to defeat the most powerful mutants if they became a threat to the world. Protocols were stored in an encrypted form in the Xavier Institute and in Moira MacTaggart's Mutant Research Center on the Muir Island.In the famed Tower of Babel storyline (JLA #44): Ra's al Ghul and the League of Assassins launch a multi-pronged simultaneous strike on all members of the Justice League of America. The strike consists of a multitude of ingenious attacks that reveal a close knowledge of the members of the Justice League's personal lives and vulnerabilities. This information was collected by Batman, as preparation against the day, any one of the Leaguers were to go rogue and needed to be taken out.In SummaryGiven that the respective Earths where metahumans already existed created protocols for dealing with those groups (and perhaps with good reason) it would seem likely our own Earth would take the same or even more drastic steps to curb, control, or exterminate metahuman activity before it could threaten the social order.This does not mean there wouldn't be attempts to capitalize on the powers and abilities of these fantastic individuals (should more appear) but I suspect fear, loathing and control would always be most government's unofficial response, no matter how nice they might behave to the metahuman's face.Superpowers would be capable of threatening the financial, social and economic powers which enjoy nearly complete control over the society we live in.Metahumans would upset that balance and I suspect not only would government create agencies to stop thempersonal concerns: megacorporations and other nationalist powers would also do the same.​It might indeed be the only thing every world leader and every government could agree on: a being as powerful and capable of revealing states secrets cannot be allowed to survive. For the sake of humanity's continued existence, such as it is: Superman must die.

The population of Australia and the world is dependent on two elements, firstly the carrying capacity and sustainability of our planet and secondly what kind of society we feel can best provide health and happiness for people and the creatures we share this finite planet with. Much of this debate revolves around ideology, the main ideologies being those of politics and economics. We live in a world driven by capitalism, a system that promotes growth, grow your business or lose, expand or die, embrace consumerism as your guiding ideal. These philosophies clash with the reality of physical limits and therefore must account for infinite growth on a planet of finite resources.Another proponent of population growth is religion, an ideology that states gods have provided this planet for people and that they must go forth, be fruitful and multiply, and multiply they do at an alarming rate. The CIA World Factbook shows this correlation with many of the world’s highest birth rates being countries shown to be the most religious by a recent Gallup Poll. The more religious states of the US have higher birth rates than those less religious and the journal Reproductive Health found "a strong association between the teenage birth rate of a particular state and its level of religiosity." Religion does drive up population.EDIT 24/07/13 - David Urquharts comment on this answer led me to look further into the link between religion and population. Hans Rosling, a Swedish doctor and statistician has researched this subject and shown the link is far more to do with economics, as countries become richer there is greater education and less need for children to work alongside their parents. A link still exists but it is minimal and therefore not really worthy of mention. The following site has a 10 minute video that succinctly demonstrates these points.http://www.gapminder.org/videos/religions-and-babies/Humanities population was relatively stable for approximately 200,000 years, at 4000 BC there were approximately 7 million people, by 1000 BC it increased to 50 million, at 1800 AD there were 980 million, 1900 saw 1.7 billion, today our population is just over 7 billion and projections for 2050, expect a world population of 9 billion, that is almost the combined populations of China(1.35 billion) and India(1.22 billion) added to this planet of finite resources in just 37 years from now. The industrial revolution and medical advances have driven this phenomenal growth spurt in just two centuries and it impacts most people on the planet.7 Billion Minds, 7 Billion Hearts More than a billion people don’t have access to safe drinking water today and we have to nearly double our production of food for all humans to live healthily. The water we use personally is only a tiny proportion of what industry and agriculture uses to produce the goods we consume, the statistics are both amazing and alarming. A cup of coffee requires 120 litres, a can of beer 150 litres, a hamburger's production uses 800 litres, a cotton shirt's production uses 3000 litres. Few are aware of the water consumption required to create our goods. Few even care because it is largely unrelated to the lives they experience.Degradation of the Aral Sea due to diversion of rivers for cotton production.The disappearance of the Aral SeaWe are using 30 - 40% of the planets land surface for humans, we are using almost all arable land right at this moment, there is little left to produce anything to feed the existing humans, not to mention billions more in the coming decades. The advances of the Green Revolution are now reaching their optimum level, the richest countries are now buying up large tracts of land within the poorest countries on earth simply to sustain food production for their own populations.Food security is now affecting first world nations, international corporations and increasingly governments are involved in a process of scouring the planet for land suitable for the cultivation of food. Intensive farming will be used and the produce exported back to their countries, their own people. The deals made with these third world countries are under scrutiny as it is unsure what level of transparency is used in the business dealings and to what extent the people of these countries will benefit or be negatively impacted by trans-national deals made by savvy corporations and governments. Most of the targeted lands are within Africa with countries such as China, Saudi Arabia and Great Britain vying for their arable lands, lands where the people already have trouble feeding themselves. African countries such as Ethiopia currently have agricultural products being exported while at the same time being dependant on international food aid.Cheap energy, primarily in the form of oil and coal has allowed us to rapidly expand our population with minimal concern for the medium to long term consequences. We use in access of 85 million barrels of oil a day, or 13,515,000,000litres to keep the world running. Energy requirements are predicted to increase by up to 40% in the next 20 years while fossil fuel exploration has to go further and further afield to meet our requirements. Thankfully though the capitalist ideal of growth driven by cheap energy at the cost of environmental degradation is now catching our attention.Infrastructure is yet another concern for societies as detailed by US economist, MIT Professor Lester Thurow. Twenty seven years ago Professor Thurow explained that infrastructure has an average life of about 50 years, some longer, some shorter, but the average is 50 years. The normal repair bill is approximately 2% of invested capital per annum, so if the average rate of population growth is 2% (Melbourne’s population grew by 3.7% during the year ended 31 December 2012, Australia’s average was 1.8%) then you require the ongoing 2% per annum plus an extra 2% for the additional people. So the population growth doubles the cost of infrastructure while the revenue base only increases by 2%. Lester predicted that this would see governments having make unpopular choices, being forced to sell off public assets and/or create public-private partnerships in order to create and maintain infrastructure for societies use. At the time his prediction was considered improbable but today we see it as a normal element of life and yet another strain increased population puts on society while profiting corporations.William Rees is a human ecologist at the University of British Columbia and has formulated what he terms “the productive biomass of the earth”, which calculates the carrying capacity of this planet. The carrying capacity simply calculates the resources of the planet and then relates this to human populations, take resources and divide them by varying populations and you arrive at the different levels of quality of life for said numbers of people. He calculates this in “global hectares”, hectares of land required to meet the needs of human survival. Optimum global hectares per individual human alongside actual global hectares used by people in various countries at present illustrate how we presently live and what needs to be achieved for both parity and survival of populations.By his calculations we presently require 2 global hectares per person (ghpp) to equally share the planets resources. According to his data the Indian uses 0.89 ghpp, the majority of people in Africa use 1.37 ghpp, Chinese = 2.11 ghpp, Europeans = 4.45 ghpp, British = 5.33 ghpp, Australians = 7.8 ghpp, Americans = 9.42 ghpp. Should every person on earth consume as Indians do the planet could sustain 15 billion people, if as little as the average Rwandan it increases to 18 billion people and at the rate of those in the US it plummets to a mere 1.5 billion, less than a quarter of the worlds current population.An additional concern is that these rates of consumption are already calculated as being unsustainable in terms of the planets capacity to both meet our level of consumption and assimilate our level of waste products. Rees believes that as the population of the planet currently lives, we require the equivalent of 1.5 planet earths to sustain ourselves into the future, at the current population of approximately 7 billion consumers. This leaves the world with a number of choices; reduce our levels of consumption, drastically reduce our population growth, properly utilise current technologies and develop additional technologies or prepare for wars in the not too distant future for lands and their resources. My hope is that we adopt the first three choices to prevent the last.We have only relatively recently become aware that our appetite for devouring natural systems is causing them monumental harm and that as we are part of natural systems, we in turn suffer this harm. Fish stocks have been depleted enormously, somewhere in the vicinity of 10% of coral reefs have been degraded to the point of no return, a third of all amphibians, a fifth of all mammals and 70% of all plants are presently under threat of extinction. Do these figures prompt one to consider human population growth is wise?Education and the implementation of technology; these two ideals might be the saviours of us and many creatures we share planet earth with, the knowledge of our plight should and must propel us to educate as many people we can and to get a variety of technologies up and running in every corner of our precious world. Not only must we utilise existing technologies we must pump as much money and resourceful minds into researching technologies that can supplement attempts to slow the pace of population growth. This slowing has one major need, the need to educate everyone from the third world to the first, generally, but specifically to inform of the dangers of over population and the need for a sustainable population as well as the need for the first world to consume substantially less than what it does today.An example of how education slows population growth is the state of Kerala in southern India where today’s high level of education sees the people of this densely populated state privileged with one of the highest literacy rates in the world. The average fertility rate in Indian states ranges from 1.3 to 3.5 with the countries average at 2.4 and Kerala at 1.5. The people in this state are both proud of their education system and their level of child birth which is lower than that of Australia at 1.7 and the US at 2. Educational needs must step beyond national borders and encompass our global community.To the specifics of Australia, a nation of 23 million people and projected to reach 36 million by 2050. This country is the driest and least arable inhabited continent on the planet with soils and seas being among the most nutrient poor and unproductive in the world and only 6% of the land mass being arable. These soils have been under increasing pressure by agriculture with acidification a major concern. Approximately 50% of Australian agricultural land or 50 million ha is prone to acidification with up to a further 25% being highly acidic. Acidic soils cause significant losses in production, can lead to salinity, increased water usage and nutrient leaching which can pollute ground water supplies.These two maps show the relationship between arable lands and soil acidification.Department of Foreign Affairs and TradeState of the Environment 2011 (SoE 2011)Australia has the least amount of water in rivers, the lowest run-off and the smallest area of permanent wetlands of all continents. For these reasons Australia is one of the most urbanised nations with more than 80% of the population living within 100kms of the coast. Looking at the physical size of Australia in no way relates to its carrying capacity for human beings and often confuses the issue in people’s minds of Australia’s optimum population.Another confusion is that we are in danger of a shrinking population as demonstrated by the Howard governments baby bonus which was continued by the present government, the difference between births and deaths has Australia growing by somewhere in the vicinity of 150,000 per year. Add to that the muddled message that Australia is an unusually ageing society, this is simply untrue, we have as many citizens under the age of 15 as we have over the age of 60, we are in fact an unusually young society when compared to other developed nations. That then leads to the myth that we accept excessive numbers of refugees, we take in about 14,000 refugees of the total intake of approximately 300,000 migrant immigration. For some reason we as a people focus on this 14,000 arriving on leaky boats, opportunistic political strategy seems to have dominated a nations concern and corrupted political discourse. This disinformation then leads to bigotry and at times international condemnation of us as a society.Then there is the economic argument, that a growing population stimulates the economy with human mass. Joseph Chamie, the former head of the United Nations population division questions this theory with what he terms “Ponzi Demography”, a pyramid population growth policy pushed by vested interests in order to profit from a rapid expansion in consumer demand. Chamie says "Like all Ponzi schemes, Ponzi demography is unsustainable. Among its primary tactics, it exploits the fear of population decline and ageing. Without a young and growing population we are warned of becoming a nation facing financial ruin and a loss of national power. Appeals are also made to one's patriotic duty to have children in order to replenish and expand the homeland."None of the above takes into account the perils we face from climate change as this is a subject so laden with information it cannot be adequately discussed in this answer. Suffice to say the best minds in the sciences relating to climate change have clearly stated what the future might hold and that is migrating humans pushed from their lands by decreasing water and food supplies. Add this momentous catastrophe to what we currently face and it is abundantly clear that we as a species are in grave danger of tipping the scales against a prosperous future for humanity. We must look beyond petty politics and economics, beyond bordered nations and disparate cultures to see the reality of what all humans need to survive here and now and into the future. To do otherwise will be madness.ReferencesAttenborough: endless growth 'lunacy'Human PopulationsFor a sustainable futureFertility and intelligenceWilliam Rees, “the productive biomass of the earth”. William E. ReesMolly Brown, NASA - Food security. Page on NasaOlivier De Scutter, United Nations, foreign land use by corporations and governments. “Vulnerable land users must be protected by international guidelines” - UN expert urges Rome summiteconomics and fertility. Good news: America's birthrate is rising againpopulation growth proponents. Population Bomb? So Wrong -- How Electricity, Development, and TV Reduce Fertility population growth proponent funders. The Breakthrough Instituteanti population growth proponents. Debunking Breakthrough Institute’s attacks on Obama, Gore, and top climate scientistsreligion and higher populations. Don't Be Fruitful and MultiplyAustralian references.Department of Foreign Affairs and Tradehttp://soilquality.org.au/factsheets/soil-acidityProfessor Ian Lowe http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ian_LoweA preview of Professor Ian Lowes book “Bigger or better?”. Limited content from google books. Bigger Or Better?Joseph Chamie “Ponzi demography” Population sustainability and the Ponzi demographyDr John Coulter. Page on EnvironmentMelbourne continues to lead nation's population growth“Dr Jane O’Sullivan” | Damn the MatrixBigger or Better? Australia’s population debatePage on Phaa