Sales Support Administrator - Bayer: Fill & Download for Free

In my case, “today” was actually November 2008. But the experience remains seared in my memory.Auschwitz has two main sections, labelled I and II. Both are horrific.Auschwitz IThe original camp was Auschwitz I. It housed various administration buildings, where all kinds of notorious Nazi acts took place. Most of the buildings are museums brimming with information on their ugly past. Behind these plain looking walls, Nazis tested and perfected the exact amount of Xylon B poison gas to kill people cheaply and at scale. Some rooms housed kangaroo courts where prisoners were tried and condemned to become test subjects. Photography inside these buildings wasn’t allowed and so I can only describe my feelings when a huge glass window fronts a room filled floor to ceiling with human hair taken from prisoners to make wigs for sale, or another room filled with spectacles snatched from the weak-eyed and elderly. The worst still is a room filled with children’s toys taken from the youngest and most innocent of those incarcerated. This exhibit finally breaks me. Through misty eyes, I see everyone around me similarly dabbing eyes and blowing noses. Yet another room has a chart showing the hub and spoke arrangement of the concentration camps dotted across Europe, each one specialized in “managing” a different ethnicity. The hub camps were the main ones constantly supplied with fresh prisoners from the smaller spoke camps. In the same room, a diagram shows how carefully the Nazis tackled the matter of gassing and incinerating prisoners, as if they were solving an engineering problem for a factory producing goods. The human throughput of this ghastly assembly line was carefully calculated for ruthless optimal efficiency.Also important to remember that these camps started as forced labor camps supplying cheap workers to nearby factories for major firms such as Bayer (yes, the makers of aspirin) and BMW, who benefited greatly. The reward for those who could keep working was life itself. For those who couldn’t keep up, either nature stepped in or the merciless Nazi guards did.Auschwitz IIThis is the one that anyone who has seen Schindler’s List will recognize, from the train carrying in new batches of unfortunates, all the way to the elimination of the weak and infirm. Unlike Auschwitz I which is converted into informative museum exhibits, Auschwitz II is a bleakly preserved place, an enduring reminder of its past and purpose. The weight and gloom of a million dead souls permeates its atmosphere.The site has virtually endless rows of identically dreary prisoner quarters. Imagine being packed with up to 500 others into one such building, sleeping on wooden planks in frigid weather while lice, diarrhea, dehydration and famine run rampant.As a “fun fact”, the number of prisoners far outnumbered their guards and theoretically could have broken out. But the Germans used a “divide and conquer” principle. Each prisoner had his/her country’s national flag stitched on their uniform to clearly establish his/her different national identity and differentiate themselves from others. The Germans would always play up these national differences and rivalries which then ensured that Hungarians only mingled with other Hungarians, Poles with other Poles, and so on. With such dissension among the prisoners, breaking out was not even a consideration.Below, you see one of the gas chambers the Nazis blew up to conceal their deeds before abandoning the camp to advancing Allies. Its diabolically designed to look like any other prisoner’s quarter from above, but the steps take you right into the bowels of the infamous gas chambers and crematorium.The dreaded train tracks carrying in endless streams of hopeless human cargo. Each arrival either went direct to the gas chambers or to their new quarters.Auschwitz changes you, you leave it but it never leaves you. The Nazis were certainly monsters, but there’s nothing fundamentally different between them and anyone else. Given supporting conditions, each of us is fully capable of such atrocities.Auschwitz in that way becomes an unsettling but unavoidable mirror for ourselves. You will not like what you see.Evil as it may be, Auschwitz is you and me. If that doesn’t terrify you, nothing will.Its an awful place, I wish I’d never visited it. But its also a place everyone must see.If you want to learn more about Auschwitz, you can do so here: Auschwitz

A blockchain,originally block chainis a growing list of records, called blocks, that are linked using cryptographyEach block contains a cryptographic hash of the previous block,[6]a timestamp, and transaction data (generally represented as a Merkle tree).By design, a blockchain is resistant to modification of the data. It is "an open, distributed ledger that can record transactions between two parties efficiently and in a verifiable and permanent way".[7]For use as a distributed ledger, a blockchain is typically managed by a peer-to-peer network collectively adhering to a protocol for inter-node communication and validating new blocks. Once recorded, the data in any given block cannot be altered retroactively without alteration of all subsequent blocks, which requires consensus of the network majority. Although blockchain records are not unalterable, blockchains may be considered secure by design and exemplify a distributed computing system with high Byzantine fault tolerance. Decentralized consensus has therefore been claimed with a blockchain.[8]Blockchain was invented by a person (or group of people) using the name Satoshi Nakamoto in 2008 to serve as the public transaction ledger of the cryptocurrency bitcoin.[1]The identity of Satoshi Nakamoto is unknown. The invention of the blockchain for bitcoin made it the first digital currency to solve the double-spending problem without the need of a trusted authority or central server. The bitcoin design has inspired other applications,[1][3]and blockchains that are readable by the public are widely used by cryptocurrencies. Blockchain is considered a type of payment rail.[9]Private blockchains have been proposed for business use. Sources such as Computerworld called the marketing of such blockchains without a proper security model The first work on a cryptographically secured chain of blocks was described in 1991 by Stuart Haber and W. Scott Stornetta.[6][11]They wanted to implement a system where document timestamps could not be tampered with. In 1992, Bayer, Haber and Stornetta incorporated Merkle trees to the design, which improved its efficiency by allowing several document certificates to be collected into one block.[6][12]The first blockchain was conceptualized by a person (or group of people) known as Satoshi Nakamoto in 2008. Nakamoto improved the design in an important way using a Hashcash-like method to timestamp blocks without requiring them to be signed by a trusted party and introducing a difficulty parameter to stabilize rate with which blocks are added to the chain.[6]The design was implemented the following year by Nakamoto as a core component of the cryptocurrency bitcoin, where it serves as the public ledger for all transactions on the network.[1]In August 2014, the bitcoin blockchain file size, containing records of all transactions that have occurred on the network, reached 20 GB (gigabytes).[13]In January 2015, the size had grown to almost 30 GB, and from January 2016 to January 2017, the bitcoin blockchain grew from 50 GB to 100 GB in size. The ledger size had exceeded 200 GiB by early 2020.[14]The words block and chain were used separately in Satoshi Nakamoto's original paper, but were eventually popularized as a single word, blockchain, by 2016.According to Accenture, an application of the diffusion of innovations theory suggests that blockchains attained a 13.5% adoption rate within financial services in 2016, therefore reaching the early adopters phase.[15]Industry trade groups joined to create the Global Blockchain Forum in 2016, an initiative of the Chamber of Digital Commerce.In May 2018, Gartner found that only 1% of CIOs indicated any kind of blockchain adoption within their organisations, and only 8% of CIOs were in the short-term "planning or [looking at] active experimentation with blockchain".[16]StructureA blockchain is a decentralized, distributed, and oftentimes public, digital ledger that is used to record transactions across many computers so that any involved record cannot be altered retroactively, without the alteration of all subsequent blocks.[1][17]This allows the participants to verify and audit transactions independently and relatively inexpensively.[18]A blockchain database is managed autonomously using a peer-to-peer network and a distributed timestamping server. They are authenticated by mass collaboration powered by collective self-interests.[19]Such a design facilitates robustworkflow where participants' uncertainty regarding data security is marginal. The use of a blockchain removes the characteristic of infinite reproducibilityfrom a digital asset. It confirms that each unit of value was transferred only once, solving the long-standing problem of double spending. A blockchain has been described as a value-exchange protocol.[20]A blockchain can maintain title rights because, when properly set up to detail the exchange agreement, it provides a record that compels offer and acceptance.BlocksBlocks hold batches of valid transactions that are hashed and encoded into a Merkle tree.[1]Each block includes the cryptographic hash of the prior block in the blockchain, linking the two. The linked blocks form a chain.[1]This iterative process confirms the integrity of the previous block, all the way back to the original genesis block.[21]Sometimes separate blocks can be produced concurrently, creating a temporary fork. In addition to a secure hash-based history, any blockchain has a specified algorithm for scoring different versions of the history so that one with a higher score can be selected over others. Blocks not selected for inclusion in the chain are called orphan blocks.[21]Peers supporting the database have different versions of the history from time to time. They keep only the highest-scoring version of the database known to them. Whenever a peer receives a higher-scoring version (usually the old version with a single new block added) they extend or overwrite their own database and retransmit the improvement to their peers. There is never an absolute guarantee that any particular entry will remain in the best version of the history forever. Blockchains are typically built to add the score of new blocks onto old blocks and are given incentives to extend with new blocks rather than overwrite old blocks. Therefore, the probability of an entry becoming superseded decreases exponentially[22]as more blocks are built on top of it, eventually becoming very low.[1][23]:ch. 08[24]For example, bitcoin uses a proof-of-work system, where the chain with the most cumulative proof-of-work is considered the valid one by the network. There are a number of methods that can be used to demonstrate a sufficient level of computation. Within a blockchain the computation is carried out redundantly rather than in the traditional segregated and parallel manner.[25]Block timeThe block time is the average time it takes for the network to generate one extra block in the blockchain. Some blockchains create a new block as frequently as every five seconds. By the time of block completion, the included data becomes verifiable. In cryptocurrency, this is practically when the transaction takes place, so a shorter block time means faster transactions. The block time for Ethereum is set to between 14 and 15 seconds, while for bitcoin it is on average 10 minutes.[citation needed]Hard forksThis section is an excerpt from Fork (blockchain) § Hard fork[edit] [history]A hard fork is a rule change such that the software validating according to the old rules will see the blocks produced according to the new rules as invalid. In case of a hard fork, all nodes meant to work in accordance with the new rules need to upgrade their software.If one group of nodes continues to use the old software while the other nodes use the new software, a permanent split can occur. For example, Ethereumhas hard-forked to "make whole" the investors in The DAO, which had been hacked by exploiting a vulnerability in its code. In this case, the fork resulted in a split creating Ethereum and Ethereum Classic chains. In 2014 the Nxt community was asked to consider a hard fork that would have led to a rollback of the blockchain records to mitigate the effects of a theft of 50 million NXT from a major cryptocurrency exchange. The hard fork proposal was rejected, and some of the funds were recovered after negotiations and ransom payment. Alternatively, to prevent a permanent split, a majority of nodes using the new software may return to the old rules, as was the case of bitcoin split on 12 March 2013.[26]DecentralizationBy storing data across its peer-to-peer network, the blockchain eliminates a number of risks that come with data being held centrally.[1]The decentralized blockchain may use ad hoc message passing and distributed networking.Peer-to-peer blockchain networks lack centralized points of vulnerability that computer crackers can exploit; likewise, it has no central point of failure. Blockchain security methods include the use of public-key cryptography.[4]:5A public key (a long, random-looking string of numbers) is an address on the blockchain. Value tokens sent across the network are recorded as belonging to that address. A private key is like a password that gives its owner access to their digital assets or the means to otherwise interact with the various capabilities that blockchains now support. Data stored on the blockchain is generally considered incorruptible.[1]Every node in a decentralized system has a copy of the blockchain. Data quality is maintained by massive database replication[8]and computational trust. No centralized "official" copy exists and no user is "trusted" more than any other.[4]Transactions are broadcast to the network using software. Messages are delivered on a best-effort basis. Mining nodes validate transactions,[21]add them to the block they are building, and then broadcast the completed block to other nodes.[23]:ch. 08Blockchains use various time-stamping schemes, such as proof-of-work, to serialize changes.[27]Alternative consensus methods include proof-of-stake.[21]Growth of a decentralized blockchain is accompanied by the risk of centralization because the computer resources required to process larger amounts of data become more expensive.[28]OpennessOpen blockchains are more user-friendly than some traditional ownership records, which, while open to the public, still require physical access to view. Because all early blockchains were permissionless, controversy has arisen over the blockchain definition. An issue in this ongoing debate is whether a private system with verifiers tasked and authorized (permissioned) by a central authority should be considered a blockchain.[29][30][31][32][33]Proponents of permissioned or private chains argue that the term "blockchain" may be applied to any data structure that batches data into time-stamped blocks. These blockchains serve as a distributed version of multiversion concurrency control (MVCC) in databases.[34]Just as MVCC prevents two transactions from concurrently modifying a single object in a database, blockchains prevent two transactions from spending the same single output in a blockchain.[35]:30–31Opponents say that permissioned systems resemble traditional corporate databases, not supporting decentralized data verification, and that such systems are not hardened against operator tampering and revision.[29][31]Nikolai Hampton of Computerworld said that "many in-house blockchain solutions will be nothing more than cumbersome databases," and "without a clear security model, proprietary blockchains should be eyed with suspicion."[10][36]PermissionlessThe great advantage to an open, permissionless, or public, blockchain network is that guarding against bad actors is not required and no access controlis needed.[22]This means that applications can be added to the network without the approval or trust of others, using the blockchain as a transport layer.[22]Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies currently secure their blockchain by requiring new entries to include a proof of work. To prolong the blockchain, bitcoin uses Hashcash puzzles. While Hashcash was designed in 1997 by Adam Back, the original idea was first proposed by Cynthia Dwork and Moni Naorand Eli Ponyatovski in their 1992 paper "Pricing via Processing or Combatting Junk Mail".Financial companies have not prioritised decentralized blockchains.[citation needed]In 2016, venture capital investment for blockchain-related projects was weakening in the USA but increasing in China.[37]Bitcoin and many other cryptocurrencies use open (public) blockchains. As of April 2018, bitcoin has the highest market capitalization.Permissioned (private) blockchainSee also: Distributed ledgerPermissioned blockchains use an access control layer to govern who has access to the network.[38]In contrast to public blockchain networks, validators on private blockchain networks are vetted by the network owner. They do not rely on anonymous nodes to validate transactions nor do they benefit from the network effect.[citation needed]Permissioned blockchains can also go by the name of 'consortium' blockchains.[citation needed]Disadvantages of private blockchainNikolai Hampton pointed out in Computerworld that "There is also no need for a '51 percent' attack on a private blockchain, as the private blockchain (most likely) already controls 100 percent of all block creation resources. If you could attack or damage the blockchain creation tools on a private corporate server, you could effectively control 100 percent of their network and alter transactions however you wished."[10]This has a set of particularly profound adverse implications during a financial crisis or debt crisis like the financial crisis of 2007–08, where politically powerful actors may make decisions that favor some groups at the expense of others,[39][40]and "the bitcoin blockchain is protected by the massive group mining effort. It's unlikely that any private blockchain will try to protect records using gigawatts of computing power — it's time consuming and expensive."[10]He also said, "Within a private blockchain there is also no 'race'; there's no incentive to use more power or discover blocks faster than competitors. This means that many in-house blockchain solutions will be nothing more than cumbersome databases."[10]Blockchain analysisThe analysis of public blockchains has become increasingly important with the popularity of bitcoin, Ethereum, litecoin and other cryptocurrencies.[41]A blockchain, if it is public, provides anyone who wants access to observe and analyse the chain data, given one has the know-how. The process of understanding and accessing the flow of crypto has been an issue for many cryptocurrencies, crypto-exchanges and banks.[42][43]The reason for this is accusations of blockchain enabled cryptocurrencies enabling illicit dark market trade of drugs, weapons, money laundering etc.[44]A common belief has been that cryptocurrency is private and untraceable, thus leading many actors to use it for illegal purposes. This is changing and now specialised tech-companies provide blockchain tracking services, making crypto exchanges, law-enforcement and banks more aware of what is happening with crypto funds and fiat crypto exchanges. The development, some argue, has led criminals to prioritise use of new cryptos such as Monero.[45][46][47]The question is about public accessibility of blockchain data and the personal privacy of the very same data. It is a key debate in cryptocurrency and ultimately in blockchain.[48]UsesBlockchain technology can be integrated into multiple areas. The primary use of blockchains today is as a distributed ledger for cryptocurrencies, most notably bitcoin. There are a few operational products maturing from proof of concept by late 2016.[37]Businesses have been thus far reluctant to place blockchain at the core of the business structure.[49]CryptocurrenciesMain article: CryptocurrencyMost cryptocurrencies use blockchain technology to record transactions. For example, the bitcoin network and Ethereum network are both based on blockchain. On 8 May 2018 Facebook confirmed that it would open a new blockchain group[50]which would be headed by David Marcus, who previously was in charge of Messenger. Facebook's planned cryptocurrency platform, Libra, was formally announced on June 18, 2019.[51][52]Smart contractsMain article: Smart contractBlockchain-based smart contracts are proposed contracts that can be partially or fully executed or enforced without human interaction.[53]One of the main objectives of a smart contract is automated escrow. An IMF staff discussion reported that smart contracts based on blockchain technology might reduce moral hazards and optimize the use of contracts in general. But "no viable smart contract systems have yet emerged." Due to the lack of widespread use their legal status is unclear.[54][55]Financial servicesMajor portions of the financial industry are implementing distributed ledgers for use in banking,[56][57][58]and according to a September 2016 IBM study, this is occurring faster than expected.[59]Banks are interested in this technology because it has potential to speed up back office settlement systems.[60]Banks such as UBS are opening new research labs dedicated to blockchain technology in order to explore how blockchain can be used in financial services to increase efficiency and reduce costs.[61][62]Berenberg, a German bank, believes that blockchain is an "overhyped technology" that has had a large number of "proofs of concept", but still has major challenges, and very few success stories.[63]In December 2018, Bitwala (a crypto-friendly banking service[64]) launched Europe's first regulated blockchain banking solution that enables users to manage both their Bitcoin and Euro deposits in one place with the safety and convenience of a German bank account. The bank account is hosted by the Berlin-based solarisBank.[65]The blockchain has also given rise to Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs) as well as a new category of digital asset called Security Token Offerings (STOs), also sometimes referred to as Digital Security Offerings (DSOs).[66]STO/DSOs may be conducted privately or on a public, regulated stock exchange and are used to tokenize traditional assets such as company shares as well as more innovative ones like intellectual property, real estate, art, or individual products. A number of companies are active in this space providing services for compliant tokenization, private STOs, and public STOs.Video gamesA blockchain game CryptoKitties, launched in November 2017.[67]The game made headlines in December 2017 when a cryptokitty character - an in-game virtual pet - was sold for more than US$100,000.[68]CryptoKitties illustrated scalability problems for games on Ethereum when it created significant congestion on the Ethereum network with about 30% of all Ethereum transactions being for the game.[69]CryptoKitties also demonstrated how blockchains can be used to catalog game assets (digital assets).[70]Supply chainThere are a number of efforts and industry organizations working to employ blockchains in supply chain logistics and supply chain management.The Blockchain in Transport Alliance (BiTA) works to develop open standards for supply chains.[citation needed]Everledger is one of the inaugural clients of IBM's blockchain-based tracking service.[71]Walmart and IBM are running a trial to use a blockchain-backed system for supply chain monitoring — all nodes of the blockchain are administered by Walmart and are located on the IBM cloud.[72]Hyperledger Grid develops open components for blockchain supply chain solutions.[73][74]Other usesBlockchain technology can be used to create a permanent, public, transparent ledger system for compiling data on sales, tracking digital use and payments to content creators, such as wireless users[75]or musicians.[76]In 2017, IBM partnered with ASCAP and PRS for Music to adopt blockchain technology in music distribution.[77]Imogen Heap's Mycelia service has also been proposed as blockchain-based alternative "that gives artists more control over how their songs and associated data circulate among fans and other musicians."[78][79]New distribution methods are available for the insurance industry such as peer-to-peer insurance, parametric insurance and microinsurance following the adoption of blockchain.[80][81]The sharing economy and IoT are also set to benefit from blockchains because they involve many collaborating peers.[82]Online voting is another application of the blockchain.[83][84]The use of blockchain in libraries is being studied with a grant from the U.S. Institute of Museum and Library Services.[85]Other designs include:Hyperledger is a cross-industry collaborative effort from the Linux Foundation to support blockchain-based distributed ledgers, with projects under this initiative including Hyperledger Burrow (by Monax) and Hyperledger Fabric (spearheaded by IBM)[86]Quorum – a permissionable private blockchain by JPMorgan Chase with private storage, used for contract applications[87]Tezos, decentralized voting.[35]:94Proof of Existence is an online service that verifies the existence of computer files as of a specific time[88]TypesCurrently, there are at least four types of blockchain networks — public blockchains, private blockchains, consortium blockchains and hybrid blockchains.Public blockchainsA public blockchain has absolutely no access restrictions. Anyone with an Internet connection can send transactions to it as well as become a validator(i.e., participate in the execution of a consensus protocol).[89][self-published source?]Usually, such networks offer economic incentives for those who secure them and utilize some type of a Proof of Stake or Proof of Work algorithm.Some of the largest, most known public blockchains are the bitcoin blockchain and the Ethereum blockchain.Private blockchainsA private blockchain is permissioned.[38]One cannot join it unless invited by the network administrators. Participant and validator access is restricted.Hybrid blockchainsA hybrid blockchain has a combination of centralized and decentralized features.[90]The exact workings of the chain can vary based on which portions of centralization decentralization are used.Lastly, I will recommend(Cryptoavenue.org)Cryptocurrency Investment Platform (Cryptoavenue - Investing Digital Currency) as it was launched at mid-summer 2013) but has become the largest cryptocurrency Investment Platform right now with a total volume over 120 million dollars Traded. This is where I invest and get my invested Bitcoin after weeks, months. They Support variety of cryptocurrency like Bitcoin, Ethereum, Bitcoin Cash and Litecoin. I find that it has a really nice UI and support.

American corporations already own not just the amazon, but the Brazilian economy, sovereignty (even our armed forces are now under the directive of the us southern command), destroyed the democratic and judicial system through the bribery and corruption of the American DOJ(through the use of law fare), and not just in Brazil! The same was done to Paraguay, Peru, Chile, Ecuador, Argentina and a military coup in Bolivia! The companies operating, profiting and deforesting the Amazon are companies like:Black rock investment group(with investments in 116 of the over 160 companies deforesting and exploring the Amazon)CargillAlcoaChevronShellTexacoMobilMonsantoDownKochMicrosoftBank of AmericaBoeingGoogleFacebookAnd many more, it’s estimated that over 90% of the companies culpable for the deforestation are American based or subsidiaries!6/2019. At the European Parliament, the Workers Party (PT) formally accuses the US Government of coordinating Operation Lava Jato. Anglo media ignores it, @BrasilWire covers the story. https://t.co/431iqQpu8Y— Brasil Wire (@BrasilWire) March 12, 2020Brasil Wire (@BrasilWire) on Twitterrevealed collusion between US & Lava Jato in a speech by DOJ's Kenneth Blanco at Atlantic Council. As a result, Lula's defense team filed a motion of dismissal of charges against Lula due to illegal collaboration with a foreign power.US admits role in Operation Lava Jato, brags about Lula convictionbrasilwire.comHidden History: The US “War On Corruption” In BrasilIntercept's excellent new article is entitled "Secret History of US Involvement in Brazil's Scandal-Wracked Operation Car Wash". 1/2018:@BrasilWirepublished "Hidden History: The US “War On Corruption” In Brasil".https://t.co/DEakiUcJNg?amp=13/2018:@BrasilWireexposed how the US DOJ was using the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) to persecute certain leaders across Latin America who would not fully cooperate with the US.8/2018:@BrasilWiretraces the US DOJ partnership with far right political operative Sérgio Moro back to 2009.US DOJ and Operation Car Wash: Facts and Questionsbrasilwire.comThis is the corrupt judge (Sergio Moro) that recent leaks show received 9 billion Reails along with the prosecutors and paid another 50 billion to right wing politicians, buying their votes to overthrow our government and imprison the front runner in the presidential election! Traitors that by now have destroyed our economy (1/2 of the gdp), growth and sovereignty by turning all over to American corporations for pennies on the dollar!A common parody in Brazil:translation: Lula wouldn’t sell out, for that reason I bought Sergio Moro!Who was then the judge assigned to lock up the members of the left and buy the ones on the right for the USA! He is now the minister of justice in Brasil! Brasil is now just like the USA, ran by a mafia and white color organized crime, the problem is that our criminals are on the usa’s payroll! So as the Amazon is concerned, American corporations are the ones profiting, exploding, burning and deforesting the region!Brazil’s Armed Forces are “to defend US interests” says researcherhttp://www.brasilwire.com/notorious-us-intelligence-official-visits-lula-appeal-court-2/http://www.brasilwire.com/neoliberalism-at-gunpoint-bolsonaro-guedes/http://www.brasilwire.com/as-lula-emerges-from-prison-us-media-ignore-how-washington-helped-put-him-there/Here are some very good readings about how Wall Street recolonized Brasil and is behind the robbery of our economy, market, wealth, sovereignty and the destruction of our democracy:Convivial War: How Wall Street Recolonized Brazil. Part One.Convivial War: How Wall Street Recolonized Brazil. Part Two.http://www.brasilwire.com/gold-against-the-soul-convivial-war-part-three/http://www.brasilwire.com/part-four-how-wall-street-recolonized-brazil/http://www.brasilwire.com/20-ways-lawfare-led-to-brazils-state-of-exception/And here is a real good article about the deforestation itself, it can be found at the Brasilwire! This is just a part of the articles above written by a american now nationalized Brazilian citizen, just to give u an idea of how American corporations are 100% behind the corrupt governments and robbing Latin America through them:In September 2019, Brazilian Minister for Foreign Affairs Ernesto Araújo met US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo in Washington D.C. and the pair announced a new U.S.-Brazil bilateral agreement to open up the Amazon Rainforest to private sector development. Araújo called the agreement “…the Holy Grail of Brazil’s foreign policy, at least for the private sector”.Prior to taking office, Bolsonaro remarked in an interview that the Amazon does not “belong” to Brazil anymore, yet foreign rhetoric over the 2019 forest fires has perversely allowed him to appear as a defender of Brazilian sovereignty – the very opposite of what he, who during his election campaign saluted the U.S. flag at an event in Miami, actually was.Many of the US and Multinational companies benefitting most from Bolsonaro’s scorched earth strategy in Amazonia share something important, and overlooked, in common: they’re members of Wall Street Lobby and Think Tank, Council of the Americas (AS/COA). Headquartered at 680 Park Avenue, New York, it is also the publisher of its own in-house magazine, Americas Quarterly.Of its members invested in the Brazilian Amazon, the biggest is so called invisible giant, Cargill, Incorporated. With $115bn in yearly sales, it is the largest privately held company in the world. It is one of the foreign companies most active in Amazonian agribusiness, with the slogan: “helping the world thrive”.Minnesota-based Cargill arrived in Brazil during 1965, following the U.S.-backed Coup the previous year. Its present day activities include the growing of Sugar Cane for Ethanol biofuel, Cocoa, Cotton and key concern, Soybean cultivation and processing, with its own infrastructure of terminals spread across nine Brazilian states.U.S. Congress member Henry A. Waxman recently called Cargill “The Worst Company in the World” in an extensive report on its destructive activities, in particular related to Soy cultivation:“The people who have been sickened or died from eating contaminated Cargill meat, the child laborers who grow the cocoa Cargill sells for the world’s chocolate, the Midwesterners who drink water polluted by Cargill, the Indigenous People displaced by vast deforestation to make way for Cargill’s animal feed, and the ordinary consumers who’ve paid more to put food on the dinner table because of Cargill’s financial malfeasance all have felt the impact of this agribusiness giant. Their lives are worse for having come into contact with Cargill.” said Waxman.In 2018, once it was clear that former President Lula da Silva would be prevented from running for President, and literally weeks before Jair Bolsonaro’s election in October, Cargill revealed plans for expansion. These included building a brand new Soy Terminal at Porto Velho, in the state of Rondonia.The new facility would be on the edge of highway BR-319, where the so called “ring of fire” was burning out of control the following winter in neighbouring Amazonas state. At that time of announcement it made little sense logistically. It was as if they were betting on imminent deforestation, the opening up of indigenous and forest reserves, to make it viable. This is precisely what has happened. Bolsonaro had run on a platform that was explicit in its intent to strip Indigenous peoples of their reserves.With the extreme-right President in office, Cargill announced explicit support for deforestation in an open letter to soybean producers in Brazil, and its opposition to environmental protection projects in the irreplaceable Cerrado Savanna biome. The 2019 Mighty Earth report also presented evidence of merciless deforestation, led by demand from Cargill, Bunge Limited and ADM, on an industrial scale in the Cerrado. COA member Goldman Sachs is also heavily invested in Sugar Cane/Ethanol in the region which contradicts their stated policy, namely that they “will not finance any project or initiate loans where the specified use of proceeds would significantly convert or degrade a critical natural habitat.”Cargill, Bunge, ADM and Goldman Sachs are just four corporate members of Council of the Americas that are active in the Brazilian Amazon and Cerrado, and linked to the fires raging across the region, which were started intentionally to enable expansion of available land, principally for Soy cultivation and Cattle.Other current or recent members of the Council actively or historically invested in the Transmazonian region include, from agribusiness: Continental Grain Company. From finance: BlackRock, BNP Paribas, J.P. Morgan Chase, Bank of America, Scotiabank, Citigroup, Inc, Santander. From Seeds and Pesticides: Bayer-Monsanto, Dow Chemical. From Oil and Gas: Chevron, ConocoPhillips. From the mining sector: Barrick Gold Corporation, Rio Tinto, Hothschild Mining, and so on.Americas Society / Council of the Americas has an estimated $10M in annual revenue. In corporate memberships alone, Council of the Americas earned in excess of $30 million dollars between President Dilma Rousseff taking office in January 2011, and the inauguration of Jair Bolsonaro in January 2019. This is small change for the companies it represents. In addition it has extended funding from patron members Chevron and HSBC.Intriguingly it also has a dedicated, separately funded anti-corruption working group, which features, according to its website “AS/COA corporate, Chairman’s International Advisory Council, Board of Directors and President’s Circle members.” This group is bankrolled “by corporate members and foundations”, and is “an action-orientated network focused on producing concrete results and contributing to the reduction of corruption in Latin America. The AWG navigates Latin America’s evolving anti-corruption movement by convening the region’s top corruption figures and corporate leaders who are determined to see the historic crackdown on graft continue.”At this very moment a Coup d’état in Honduras was well in motion, one which Clinton – whose 2016 campaign team had also lobbied for COA member Monsanto – later admitted that she and her administration had supported.The ousted President Manuel Zelaya was given refuge in Brazil’s Tegucigalpa Embassy, which was besieged by U.S. trained Honduran Military, and even targeted with what was described as a “Neurotoxic” hydrogen cyanide gas attack, leaving Zelaya, his assembled allies, and embassy employees complaining of symptoms. The new U.S. supported post-coup regime threatened to close the Brazilian embassy altogether, in what was a major test for Brazil’s diplomacy under the government of Lula da Silva, and an early flashpoint with the new Obama administration. Clinton was already in conflict with Brazil, over its brokering of an Iranian nuclear deal, one which the new Obama administration were unhappy with, specifically how Brazil was able to negotiate without them. Brazil was also unique in the global south in that it had both mineral Uranium and the proprietary technology to process it. Only the United States and Russia shared this capability.A decade later the politically imprisoned Lula would remark that “Obama was much harder towards Brazil” than his predecessor George W. Bush, and that “I am sure that Hillary Clinton does not like Latin America.”In response to the degenerating human rights situation in Honduras, protesters invaded a Council of the Americas meeting at their New York headquarters. In a video of the incident, a demonstrator is violently ejected after accusing the Council of funding the Honduran Coup, and of complicity in the murder of activists Berta Caceres and Nelson Garcia. “Emotional issues, ladies and gentlemen.” responds AS/COA Vice President Eric Farnsworth, as the young activist is manhandled away down the corridor.Honduras was a harbinger of things to come for Latin America, but such brute force made way for more sophisticated processes, and far tighter control of optics.The then senior editor of Americas Quarterly, Jason Marczak, went on to found the Atlantic Council’s Adrienne Arsht Latin America Center in 2013, along with Peter Schechter of CLS Strategies, who had been contracted by the post-coup interim government of Roberto Micheletti to improve the Honduran regime’s image in the United States. NATO adjunct Atlantic Council would later throw its full weight behind Brazil’s Operation Lava Jato.Months after Clinton’s 2009 speech at COA, Judge Sérgio Moro would appear for the first time in leaked State Department cables, at a Rio de Janeiro event conducted in collaboration with the U.S. Department of Justice. The event was part of the so-called project bridges, in which Brazilian prosecutors would learn “best practices” from their U.S. counterparts, such the utilisation of plea bargain testimony, and the formation of prosecution task-forces – specifically in Brazil’s hard-right strongholds of Curitiba and Campo Grande.All of this is found on the articles above, and trump and pompeo whom both care only for profits and are global warming deniers, have really expanded both the deforestation, pillaging and robbery of Latin American resources exponentially! Although nothing as like the fascist, corrupt governments installed in Bolivia, Honduras, El Salvador and Colombia, Brazil and the rest of the right wing imposed governments by them are turning just as corrupt and fascists!Bolsonaro in the Hague: Charges filed over Coronavirus ResponseUN rules Bolsonaro violated torture treatyhttp://www.brasilwire.com/brasils-fascist-green-hens-are-back/The trump administration is overthrowing democracies and replacing them with organized crime, fascists and Nazis in Latin America!