Research Paper Evaluation Form (Pdf: Fill & Download for Free

I have been working with such guys since year 2011, from my IIT Delhi days. Had closely watched the process and at the same time I am associated with UPSC too. So I am trying to put my view-I don't think so. Ph.D as a backup for UPSC?See, if you're going for Ph.D then this itself needs some months or year for getting enrolled. Either GATE/ CSIR or independent exam preparation. Once you get into it , you will have tobe in the department for long hours to finish your research paper/s,taking tutorials for undergraduate or postgraduate depend on your institution,Third, most important is - Fulfilling demand in the form of exam copy evaluation, some extra jobs allocated by your guide.(probably)These above steps will be covering your most of time. With Ph.D you can prepare for UPSC, only incase your guide is very humble to you and takes research very lightly (which doesn't happen in most of cases), otherwise your Ph.D will be just a piece of paper (copied research papers).Mindset-PhD needs a strict thinking in your particular topic only. It may not be that much required for your UPSC optional ( because UPSC needs undergraduate stuff, little bit from PG). Whereas in Research we tend to work more comprehensively with topic not in general or doesn't focus on practice questions like a graduate. So if you think you will rock in optional, believe me this can be disastrous. Many candidates are out of mains because of their such strategy only.NowIf still you wanna go for UPSC, then do it in either of the way-Focus for three years only on PhD , finish your research papers first. Try to do it in first one and half year only. Search a humble guide. Mentally being strong to face downs in UPSC journey. Yeah you can apply for teaching with your PhD side by side and back up job.Now in the third year of your research, when you have done almost your research work, go for full shot for UPSC , with complete dedication. UPSC needs it .OrIn other way, first two years go for UPSC preparation and finish all basics and take one attempt for UPSC . Now if clicked in the selected pdf of UPSC, then it's very good. Otherwise 6 hours in a day for UPSC and rest of the time for PhD research work with continuous attempt in UPSC.( It has less chances to go for PhD because that much enthusiasm wouldn't be remained, I think.)…….That is what I can say, rest any particular can better decide for himself/herself.

Choose the UGC listed journal related to your research topic and then select the relevant research paper.Submit your research article/manuscript in .DOC/.DOCX file format to us by mail or online submission.Submit online Submit by mail to editor In the subject of the mail write down “Submission of Manuscript/Research Paper: Name of Paper”. also mention paper category, title of the paper, fullname of author, designation, contact number In the message body of the mail.Next to submissionPlease prepare your research paper/manuscript in paper format(click here for download the paper format).also Submitted papers MUST be written in English.our team will give the acknowlegement by mail regarding paper submission. also author will get the submitted paper unique registration id.Author can track his/her submitted paper status online by login author account.for login authors have to use paper registration id and corresponding author mail id.Paper accept/reject notification - Out reviewer team will evaluate submitted research paper and give Notification of research paper accepted or not. the case of paper rejection, author have to make the modification as per instruction given by our reviewer committee.Document submission - once payment of the publication fees, author have to submit following document in single mail to editor Undertaking by Author Form (scanned copy)(Handwritten signed by author) (Download)Copy right transfer form (scanned copy) (Handwritten signed by author) (Download)Identity Proof of corresponding author only(scanned copy) (any one from election Card/PAN Card/College Identity card/Driving License)Payment Proof (pdf file of the mail i.e. received from PayUMoney if paid by payUMoney, OR Scan copy/Screen shot) also mentions Paid amount, Transaction ID, and Date of Payment in the mail whenever you send these documents.Final Manuscript/Research paper (must be in DOC file format and file name should be your registration ID)Paper Publication - after receivingabove mentioned documents, our team will publish your paper in 3 to 4 of days.Certificate of publication- author can download certificates of each author, confirmation letter, and published paper from AUTHOR HOME.

Molly Fro, (Below) The base used in e cigarettes is glycerol. Glycerol is an alcohol, not a lipid.Dr Konstantinos Farsalinos responded to a research paper claiming that a patient had developed Lipoid Pneumonia as a result of vaping. This is what he had to say…“…doctors and scientists should consult their textbooks before making such statements. To be exact, they should go back to chemistry books of secondary school. That will remind them that glycerol is an ALCOHOL, not a lipid. Therefore it is absolutely impossible that glycerol can cause lipoid pneumonia, even if it is aspirated in liquid form! That would violate basic chemistry laws!!”http://www.ecigarette-research.com/web/index.php/2013-04-07-09-50-07/2014/157-glycerolTaking the incident in Spain where two doctors diagnosed (correctly) lipoid https://pdfs.semanticschopneumonia and blamed (incorrectly) e cigarette use. lar.org/aa92/91b31eae8f1f6b51eea32511721d33f81313.pdfMaking the basic error of thinking that glycerol is an oil, adding to that the e cigarette was withdrawn, they concluded that the e cigarette was at fault.Another case of Lipoid pneumonia was published in Chest Journal. An Unexpected Consequence of Electronic Cigarette Use At the time, knowing that there was no oil in e liquid, I looked at the list of medications that the lady was on. One stood out - a metered dose asthma inhalator. Using Google (I am not a pharmacist) I found a list of the ingredients, amongst which was, oleic acid, which, of course is a lipid. This too would have been withdrawn. Using the doctors own logic: her condition could have been caused by her asthma inhalator, not her e cigarette. You should also note that her lung condition (asthma?) was pre-existing, but she had just started using an e cigarette.This implies that she was using the inhalator long before the e cigarette. I am not a doctor but believe lipoid pneumonia is caused by the accumulation of oil in the lung… this in turn implies an exposure over time.For convenience the PDF can be found here… https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/aa92/91b31eae8f1f6b51eea32511721d33f81313.pdfYou make a valid point in that flavorings may contain toxins (oils)which might cause harm, however, these exist in such tiny quantities that they are, in some cases, found at higher levels in ambient air than in e cigarette vapour. For example, in the kitchen where formaldehyde, metals (and yes), oils abound . Take a look at the oil filter on the extractor and see what it has been ‘breathing’ in… It did not come from my e cigarette, that is for sure.As for metals: The publicity and fear mongering regarding metals found in e cigarette vapour are outrageous. No, that term is a gross understatement. The publicity and fear mongering is, ‘murderous.’Read… Are Metals Emitted from Electronic Cigarettes a Reason for Health Concern? A Risk-Assessment Analysis of Currently Available Literature“In this study the hazardous potential of metals emitted to EC aerosol was evaluated, by using regulatory standards of acceptable exposure. The results show that the levels of daily exposure from EC use are significantly lower compared to acceptable exposure from inhalational medications and by orders of magnitude lower than the regulatory limits for daily occupational exposure. It is important to emphasize that such analysis was performed by using worst case scenarios: the daily exposure from ECs was overestimated (doubling the average number of daily puffs), while in the secondary analysis we additionally assumed that a person breaths with the resting respiratory rate and tidal volume over the whole day (underestimating the level of acceptable daily exposure calculated from MRLs and RELs). Still, the levels of metals exposure from EC use were of minimal apparent health concern. Exposure to multiple metals is also observed in medicinal products such as nicotine inhalers.”I will emphasize, Exposure to multiple metals is also observed in medicinal products such as nicotine inhalers.So where does that leave your assertion that e cigarettes are “potentially… more harmful than actual tobacco cigarettes”?The poison is in the dose.Let take an example: look at the formation of formaldehyde in e cigarette vapour.The creation of formaldehyde is easy… keep breathing. The creation of formaldehyde in e cigarette vapour (and creating a scare) is a little bit more complex.Take an old fashioned, outdated tank system with a 2.1 ohm, capillary activated coil.Match it up to a modern high powered, variable voltage / wattage vaporizer batteryPut it in a ‘puffing machine’ which does not replicate real usage.Make sure that the puff regime creates heat by overlong draws on the device and tiny intervals in between.If that does not produce the desired result, turn up the power, and again, and again, and again. Keep doing this till what you want to achieve is achieved.Voila! We have more formaldehyde than is found in a cigarette.Send the results with a suggested headline, missing out all of the above, to the media via a press release.And this is exactly how the formaldehyde scare was initiated.A note on the use of the term, ‘murderous,’ above.The assertion that e cigarettes are as, or more, toxic than tobacco smoking is outrageous. People hearing this will possibly be put off from making the transition from smoking to vaping as a result.The people responsible for fear mongering in the face of the evidence, by creating and presenting junk science to support their view, must take a share of the responsibility that they have contributed to the suffering and untimely death of those who listened to them.