Pro Forma Affidavit: Fill & Download for Free

First of all she is not a Hindu, she is a Christian with a birth name Edvige Antonia Albina Màino. Her parents were Italian with her Father Stefano Maino following his return from Russia where he had been a prisoner of war. Stefano had joined the Nazi army as a volunteer. Sonia is a Russian not Italian name. While spending two years in a Russian jail, Sonia’s father had become quite pro-Soviet; especially after the liberating US army in Italy had confiscated all fascists’ properties including his.She was not born in Orbassano as she claims in her bio data submitted to Parliament on becoming MP, but in Luciana as stated in her birth certificate. She perhaps would like to hide the place of her birth because of her father’s connection with the Nazis and Mussolini’s Fascists, and her family’s continuing connections with the Nazi-Fascists underground that is still surviving since 1945 in Italy. Luciana is where Nazi-Fascist network is headquartered, and is on the Italian-Swiss border. There can be no other explanation for this otherwiseShe met Rajiv Gandhi in a Bar where she had come for Internship “not as a bar dancer”. She fall in love and after marrying him Indira Gandhi had given her a name from which she can win Congress vote and then after her name became Sonia Gandhi.Her role as a party workerAfter Rajiv Gandhi's death she was a regular party worker winning from Amethi seat and after six-seven years became the president of party. Many say she was the real P.M. of India not Manmohan Singh that everyone thought.Now coming at the real question….Is Sonia Gandhi a Anti Hindu.,.,.,., the answer is yes. I can give you many evidences to support my claim. And here it goes…….Sonia cried for the killing of two terrorists by the police but had no words for the policemen being killedOn the evening of 13 Sept 2008 a series of bomb blasts rocked the Indian capital New Delhi. This blast killed around 30 people and injured more than 100. The Delhi Police was assigned to investigate the bombing. As part of their investigation, the Delhi Police examined several leads, witnesses and CCTV footages. During the examination of the leads available to the Delhi Police, they deduced that the suspects of the bombings or people connected with the bombings may be hiding in a building called Batla House in the Jamia Nagar area of New Delhi. In addition of the investigative leads, the Delhi Police received a specific piece of intelligence confirming the location of the terrorists hide-out "Batla House".In the ensuing firefight between the Delhi Police, two terrorists were killed, two were arrested and one escaped who reappeared in Syria two days ago as an ISIS recruiter. In the subsequent raids after interrogating the two captured terrorists many arrests were made across India which included many low level Muslim political leaders.What happened after this shoot-out between the Delhi Police and the terrorists is a matter of concern for Indian national security. Many popular political leaders belonging to the pseudo-secular political parties like Samajwadi Party, Indian National Congress, Aam Aadmi Party accused the Delhi Police of staging a false shoot-out and killing two innocent Muslim youth. The family of Insp. Mohan Chand Sharma returned the government money accusing the political party of playing vote bank politics and felt insulted. The Supreme Court of India ordered the National Human Right Commission of India to conduct an investigation to see if there were any truth in the accusations of fake killings of the two Muslim youth. The NHRCI submitted a report to the Supreme Court of India in which they concluded that there was no evidence that an extra-judicial killing took place and the two terrorists killed were a genuine police operation thus exhonarating the Delhi Police of any wrong doing in this operation.2. Do you know why a terrorist is simply a Muslim girl because she had not killed Modi yet..Her name was Ishrat Jahan.The Ishrat Jahan encounter case is an ongoing criminal case in the Gujarat state of India, in which the Indian Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) initially accused officers of the Ahmedabad Police Crime Branch and members of the Subsidiary Intelligence Bureau (SIB) of Ahmedabad have jointly having carried out a staged "encounter killing" by shooting dead four people on 15 June 2004.Several officials associated with the case, including those from Home Ministry and Intelligence Bureau, later accused the then UPA government of changing an affidavit for political gains.Following latest developments, SupremeThe Ishrat Jahan encounter case is an ongoing criminal case in the Gujarat state of India, in which the Indian Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) initially accused officers of the Ahmedabad Police Crime Branch and members of the Subsidiary Intelligence Bureau (SIB) of Ahmedabad..Those killed in the incident were Ishrat Jahan Raza, a 19-year-old woman from Mumbra, Maharashtra, and three men – Javed Ghulam Sheikh (born Pranesh Pillai), Amjad Ali Rana and Zeeshan Johar.The police claimed that Ishrat Jahan and her associates were Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) operatives involved in a terroristic plot to assassinate the Chief Minister of Gujarat, Narendra Modi. Though refuted by several human right activists and questioned by CBI, these claims have gained credence after revelations by several officials associated with this case.David Headley, a Pakistani-American terrorist who had collaborated with the LeT, later said that Ishrat Jahan was an operative of the LeT.But when he was deposing via video conferencing from the U.S. before Judge G.A. Sanap in the 26/11 trial against Abu Jundal, David Coleman Headley told the court that he didn't have any first hand knowledge about Ishrat Jahan who was killed in a police encounter.Later, David Coleman Headley claimed that LeT commander Zaki-ur Rehman Lakhvi had told him about Ishrat Jahan ‘operation’ though he had also learnt about the case through the media.These two persons(PP Pandey and DG Vanzara) were in jail from 2013–2015 for killing Israt Jahan. What a shame as they were later a special CBI court granted bail to them.3. Just see this imageRahul Gandhi the beloved son of Sonia Gandhi had said to the then U.S. ambasador that Hindu terror is much more vigorous than Laskar-e-taiba.This hindu only won them election after election since 1947 how can they say this when they carry their hindu name despite being a muslim(indira khan w/o Feroz Khan) and Sonia Gandhi(Entire name copied ascept gandhi).4. Congress vs. Ram SetuIt was a heated up topic when the Sonia Gandhi led congress government filed a affidavit in the court in favor of demolishing the Ram Setu which they said was a man made bridge in the 1850s which is needed to be demolished for the creation of a route which decreases the length of the cargo ships(passing about Sri Lanka) by more than 1000 km. But the main topic was the statements given up by the congress leaders that there was no Ram Setu in our History and this was a myth like the Ramayanas.If they don't have faith in our Indian culture then why the hell they say that they are a Pro Hindu party.And then the savior Sri Subramanium Swamy filed a case against it and won and was successful in saving one of our cultures great artifact or place or say proof(for the congress that the Ramayan and Mahabharat's were true)I can go on adding points after points that how the Sonia Gandhi or Congress is a Anti-Hindu party but I think you have understood this and now knows “who's in who's favour”.

I would say it’s a rather stern reminder to the Republican Party not to undermine the foundational integrity of the elections by claiming fraud in the absence of evidence. Although this has become their default approach in the modern era, President Bush is reminding them of a time when this wasn’t the case. And I say that even though he benefitted from a controversial Supreme Court decision which handed Bush his first term in office.He’s correct, however: the election was fair (as born out by the fact that Biden didn’t win in a magical landslide, but that the election was somewhat close), and the result will stand, since it would require a minimum of three different states seeing their results overturned to change the outcome.As it stands, nobody thinks that this is likely, and the Trump Campaign has not presented sufficient evidence to prove that there has been any widespread electoral fraud.What we do have are the outcomes of several court cases.In Michigan, the court threw out the request from the Trump Campaign to halt the counting of ballots, with the judge observing:"What I have at best is a hearsay affidavit, I believe, that addresses a harm that would be significant, but that's what we got. We've got an affidavit that is not firsthand knowledge."This asserting that the Campaign’s attempt to use the courts to prevent the full counting of ballots was based on hearsay and rumour, rather than concrete evidence.In Philadelphia, the Trump Campaign argued that it had not been able to observe the ballot-counting process, and that it should be invalidated.During a hearing in a separate case filed in federal court, Jerome Marcus, a lawyer for the campaign, told Judge Paul Diamond "there's a non-zero number of people in the room."[1]If it’s not clear, that means there were observers present, which invalidates their argument. Do, please, join me in laughing at “non-zero number of people”.And, if that’s not enough, we also have this: PA Republican state senate leader won't appoint pro-Trump electors.Pennsylvania's Senate Majority Leader Jake Corman slapped down a call echoed by Donald Trump Jr. that Republican state legislators appoint pro-Trump electors to the Electoral College to override the results of the 2020 presidential election.According to WHYY, Philadelphia and Wilmington's NPR affiliate, Corman's spokesperson said the GOP controlled state legislature would not move to appoint partisan electors, despite President Donald Trump voicing unfounded concerns about voting in Philadelphia - where votes had given Democrat Joe Biden the lead in Pennsylvania Friday morning.On Thursday, Trump Jr. retweeted conservative talk show host Mark Levin's demand, which was written in all caps, to put fellow Republicans on the Electoral College, which would then sway the count toward Trump.In other words, having failed to win the state at the ballot boxes, Trump Jr. wants the state’s electors to vote for Donald Trump anyway, thus overriding the public vote and announcing Pennsylvania for Trump even though he didn’t win the state. I can’t think of anything more blatantly undemocratic, and even though electors are there to vote as they see fit, it would be shocking to allow 20 electors to ignore the millions of Pennsylvanians who voted to elect Biden as President, particularly given that he won the majority of votes cast in the state.President Bush was trying to remind us that we cannot allow democracy in the US to be undermined so blatantly, otherwise we’ll simply have to acknowledge that the US’ decline into authoritarianism would be complete.Footnotes[1] Fact-checking Trump's claims on poll watchers

The multiple news reports of these individuals being a right wing militia is another disappointing example of bias from mainstream journalists. Did any of them investigate the backgrounds of these individuals who actually belong to a long standing anarchist organization?The 15-page FBI affidavit against the terrorists—who called their group the Wolverine Watchmen—contains verbatim excerpts of conversations, which were recorded by two informants and two FBI infiltrators. (The two informants—neither of whom knew that the other was an informant—were members of the group who got spooked by talk of committing violence, went to law enforcement, and agreed to wear wires while attending meetings.) At least in the passages cited in the affidavit, there are no racist remarks or references to President Donald Trump’s rhetoric. More typical is this soliloquy on July 24 by Adam Fox, clearly the group’s leader:“In all honesty, right now … I just wanna make the world glow, dude. I’m not even fuckin’ kidding. I just wanna make it all glow, dude. I don’t fuckin’ care anymore. I’m just so sick of it. That’s what it’s gonna take for us to take it back. … Everything’s gonna have to be annihilated, man. We’re gonna topple it all, dude. It’s what great frickin’ conquerors, man, we’re just gonna conquer every fuckin’ thing, man.”but there is no indication that the Wolverine Watchmen are pro-Trump. One of them tweeted a video some time ago (the date isn’t clear) in which he says, “Trump is not your friend, dude. … He’s a tyrant. Every single person that works for government is your enemy, dude.” The Michigan Kidnapping Plot Wasn’t About Trump. It Goes Deeper Than That.Alleged Whitmer kidnapping plotter posted anti-Trump video