Welcome To The 2014-2015 Hockey Season Thank You So Much: Fill & Download for Free

Wrong. There is no such data. First according the scientific method global warming is an hypothesis that can be disproved, falsified or debunked by data, but no science hyposthesis can proved.Indeed, there is growing amounts of data that shows that current warming is not unusual and that it has been warmer around the world in the past. This data debunks the fear of global warming posited from the fudged and infamous hockey stick of temperatures by Michael Mann adopted by the UN IPCC then after being exposed as a fraud deleted.Further data also shows the earth is cooling today - including the Middle East with record snowfall.Electroverse - Documenting Earth Changes during the next GSM and Pole ShiftExtreme Weather Archives - ElectroverseMonster Snowdrifts block Scottish roads, Southern Croatia sees first April Snow ever, as Whitehorse Snowpack reaches 300% of normalExtreme Weather GSMMONSTER SNOWDRIFTS BLOCK SCOTTISH ROADS, SOUTHERN CROATIA SEES FIRST APRIL SNOW EVER, AS WHITEHORSE SNOWPACK REACHES 300% OF NORMALAPRIL 7, 2021 CAP ALLONFlake, flake, flake, little April snow-showers.The Northern Hemisphere’s snowpack remains reluctant to return to 1982-2012 norms.This real-world observation (aka fact) is a sign of the times, it is a dismantling of the AGW hypothesis, as well as a humiliation for modern climate science and every parroting proponent of an imminent heat-induced catastrophe.Total snow mass for the Northern Hemisphere is holding at some 500 Gigatons above the multidecadal average (see the FMI chart below) — this reality is, and always has been, an impossibility under the Global Warming hypothesis:[FMI]MONSTER SNOWDRIFTS BLOCK SCOTTISH ROADSPictures from Aberdeenshire showed banks of deep, wind-blown snow on the morning of April 6.The road between Fyvie in Turriff and Cross of Jackston in Inverurie was completely blocked following the extreme weather conditions, reports dailyrecord.co.uk — this event coming just a few months after the UK Met Office declared that AGW would render British snowfall a thing of the past by as soon as 2040.What a joke:April snowdrifts, Scotland [Image: Fubar News].In addition to record snow, record cold is also besieging the British Isles.Staying in Scotland, the city of Aberdeen registered a low of -3.4C (25.9F) on April 5, busting its previous record of -3.2C (26.2F) set back in 1984—which is not only the title of an eerily prophetic dystopian social science fiction novel, it is also the year of the commencement of the solar min of cycle 21.The mercury ACROSS the UK fell further on Tuesday and Wednesday, with parts of northern England registering -7C (19.4F) and below–some of the coldest April temperatures ever recorded in Britain. In fact, -10C (14F) was forecast for the Scottish Glens on April 7, and if that played out –something I’m working on confirming– then the all-time daily low for the date, which currently stands as the -8.9C (16F) set back in 1935, would have been comfortably surpassed.The UK is struggling to see the back of what was a historically cold winter, particularly in Scotland — back in February it was reported that after nearly two months of largely sub-zero temperatures, Scotland was suffering “one of the longest spells of cold snowy weather this century;” and even now, as we enter the second week of April, there are few signs that old man winter is done.SOUTHERN CROATIA SEES FIRST APRIL SNOW EVERIt was a historic meteorological evening in the city of Split, Dalmatia on April 6, reports dalmacijadanas.hr.The temperature at the official DHMZ station, located on Marjan (a hill located on the peninsula of Split) dropped to 0.4C (32.7F) on Tuesday morning — a reading just a tenth of a degree above the lowest-ever minimum registered in April (from April 8, 2003).Snow fell all over the city, continues the dalmacijadanas.hr article: “Southern Croatia does not remember when the last snow fell in April … it is the first known snow cover in Split in April in known history.”Historic April snow in Split [Miroslav Lelas/PIXSELL]Snow fell on the entire Split area, including Kaštela.In other parts of Dalmatia (one of the four historical regions of Croatia, and home to Split), heavier totals were observed; here, as much as 20 cm (8 inches) of April pow-pow settled.Kaštel Gomilica suffered a powerful snowstorm with hurricane gusts of up to 120 km / h.Snow also fell along the coast in Vodice, Šibenik, and Brela.While on the Dinara (a 100km-long mountain range), the mercury plunged to -24C (-11.2F)–again, one of the coldest-ever temperatures suffered in Dalmatia at this time of year, according to total-croatia-news.com.Spring in Croatia.WHITEHORSE SNOWPACK REACHES 300% OF NORMALEven taking into account the city’s Arctic locale, this past winter was epically snowy for the Yukon capital of Whitehorse, reports theweathernetwork.com.As of April 5, there was a whopping 70 cm (2.3 feet) of snow left on the ground across Whitehorse–the most on record for the date. And for reference, the snowpack usually peaks around 30 cm (1 foot), and then by late April the base has diminished to all-but zero — this year is proving quite exceptional, visualized in the below chart:Temperatures are forecast to remain unusually cold over the next couple of weeks up north, meaning some of that snowpack will inevitably make it into May, perhaps even June! A formidable shot of January-like cold is en route to Alaska and parts of northern Canada this weekend, with Anchorage expected to extend its current streak of 161 days with temps below the freezing mark. The city could actually see its chilliest temperature of the season during the coming freeze — extraordinarily rare for April, concludes the theweathernetwork.com article.UPDATE on the historic Arctic front moving across Europe this weekend, May 3-6thBy Marko Korosec | Mesoscale Discussion | 03 May 201A very intense Arctic front is moving south across Europe this weekend and is expected to bring unusually low temperatures, snow and dangerous frost into some vulnerable areas on Sunday, Monday and Tuesday. Some areas could experience morning temperatures well below zero, which would be potentially devastating for vineyards and agriculture. Overall, very cold days are expected across much of our continent through mid next week, while it remains mild and warm across the Iberian peninsula.Ireland Temperatures Cooling Since 1988. And Deep Blue Vermont Says ‘No’ To Wind PowerBy P Gosselin on17. January 2020Share this...By Kiryeand P. GosselinYes, climate change is real.But what they don’t tell us is that in many places that change has gone in the opposite direction of what alarmists like to have us think.Moreover, that change is obviously driven far more by natural causes, such as solar and oceanic cycles, and has very little to do with man-made CO2.Today we look at the untampered temperature datasets of the Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA) that go back to 1988 and which are mostly complete.Here’s the plot of the 6 stations with adequate data:Data: JMAFive of the 6 stations show cooling or no upward trend. Earlier predictions of rapid warming are proving to be false.Next is a plot of 8 stations using data from NASA, which show notable cooling trend over the past 25 years:Deep blue Vermont says no to Big WindWhen it comes to wind energy, we’re seeing strong signals against it coming from Vermont, a state that is as politically blue, and thus pro-green, as any state could possibly be.One would think that the Green Mountain State would welcome “clean”, renewable wind energy and happily make its contribution to rescuing the climate and environment. Vermont, after all, is home to Bernie Sanders and Bill McKibben.Ironically, Vermont’s strong environmental streak is backfiring on industrial wind. Vermont citizens are realizing industrial wind parks are not green after all, and aren’t worth defacing the rural landscape. Vermonters now more than ever want them the hell out.For example, Windpower Engineering Development site here reports how Vermont’s political environment now “is hostile to wind energy”.“In 2012, there were over a dozen wind projects in development. Now there are none. This is truly a sad state of affairs for Vermont,” stated David Blittersdorf, CEO and founder of AllEarth Renewables.Large wind facilities bannedMeanwhile voters in the tiny Vermont village of Grafton have endorsed a new town plan that prohibits industrial and commercial wind, reports the Brattleboro Reformer here. “On a 95-66 vote during an all-day ballot Monday, residents approved the new town plan, which bans any large wind facility, and includes other planning updates.”Also neighboring Windham has said “no” to industrial wind parks by developer Iberdrola, which has since “dropped its plans to build what would have been the largest wind project in the state of Vermont,” writes the Brattleboro Reformer.Good to see Vermonters are finally waking up to the green energy madness and landscape blight and zero benefit it all leads to.Ireland Temperatures Cooling Since 1988. And Deep Blue Vermont Says ‘No’ To Wind Power81 Graphs From 62 New (2018) Papers Invalidate Claims Of Unprecedented Global-Scale Modern WarmingBy Kenneth Richard on10. May 2018During 2017, there were 150 graphs from 122 scientific papers published in peer-reviewed journals indicating modern temperatures are not unprecedented, unusual, or hockey-stick-shaped — nor do they fall outside the range of natural variability. We are a little over 4 months into the new publication year and already 81 graphs from 62 scientific papers undermine claims that modern era warming is climatically unusual.Zheng et al., 2018“In this study we present a detailed GDGT data set covering the last 13,000 years from a peat sequence in the Changbai Mountain in NE China. The brGDGT-based temperature reconstruction from Gushantun peat indicates that mean annual air temperatures in NE China during the early Holocene were 5–7°C higher than today. Furthermore, MAAT records from the Chinese Loess Plateau also suggested temperature maxima 7–9°C higher than modern during the early Holocene (Peterse et al., 2014; Gao et al., 2012; Jia et al., 2013). Consequently, we consider the temperatures obtained using the global peat calibration to be representative of climate in (NE) China. … The highest temperatures occurred between ca. 8 and 6.8 kyr BP, with occasional annual mean temperatures >8.0 ± 4.7°C, compared to the modern-day MAAT of ∼3°C.”Anderson et al., 2018“We estimate that air temperatures were 2.5–3.0 °C higher during the Holocene Thermal Maximum than the local 1960–1990 average. … Between 1700 and 1925 CE temperatures were likely 0.6–0.8 °C lower than the 1950–2015 reference temperature.“Harning et al., 2018“Iceland’s terrestrial HTM [Holocene Thermal Maximum] has previously been constrained to ~7.9 to 5.5 ka based on qualitative lake sediment proxies (Larsen et al., 2012; Geirsdottir et al., 2013), likely in association with progressive strengthening and warming of the Irminger Current (Castaneda et al., 2004; Smith et al., 2005; Olafsdottir et al., 2010). Numerical modeling experiments for Drangajokull suggest that peak air temperatures were 2.5 – 3°C warmer at this time relative to the 1961-1990 CE average (Anderson et al., 2018). … During the Little Ice Age (LIA, 1250-1850 CE), the Vestfirðir region entered the lowest multi centennial spring/summer temperature anomalies of the last 9 ka. Based on recent numerical modeling simulations, this anomaly is estimated to be 0.6-0.8°C below the 1950-2015 average on Vestfirðir (Anderson et al., 2018).”Grieman et al., 2018“[C]limate anomalies appear to be reflected in the Tunu VA [vanillic acid] record, with elevated VA [vanillic acid] during the warm periods and lower levels during the colder periods. The data suggest a positive correlation between North American fire and hemispheric mean temperature. This relationship could be due to climate-driven changes in temperature or precipitation on burning extent, frequency, or location, as well as to changes in atmospheric transport patterns. … … [E]levated VA [vanillic acid] early in the record [Roman Warm Period] and around the MCA [Medieval Climate Anomaly]. It also emphasizes the decreasing trend from 1200-1900 CE [Little Ice Age] and the increase during the 20th century [Current Warm Period].”Go to this site to see full data dump.81 Graphs From 62 New (2018) Papers Invalidate Claims Of Unprecedented Global-Scale Modern WarmingThe data debunks the Mann hockey stick and he lost his court case for libel against the famous Dr. Tim Ball because Mann refused to disclose the source of his data. What do you think of Mann’s integrity and ethics and that he continues to hold a prominent position in University and public life? This story like climate gate email scandal is a reason the politicizing science and denying open debate is so harmful to the public often unaware of the circumlocutions.Monday, 01 October 2018NASA Sees Climate Cooling Trend Thanks to Low Sun ActivityWritten by James Murphyhttp://Tweethttps://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/30214-nasa-sees-climate-cooling-trend-thanks-to-low-sun-activityNASA Sees Climate Cooling Trend Thanks to Low Sun ActivityThe climate alarmists just can’t catch a break. NASA is reporting that the sun is entering one of the deepest Solar Minima of the Space Age; and Earth’s atmosphere is responding in kind.So, start pumping out that CO2, everyone. We’re going to need all the greenhouse gases we can get.“We see a cooling trend,” said Martin Mlynczak of NASA’s Langley Research Center. “High above Earth’s surface, near the edge of space, our atmosphere is losing heat energy. If current trends continue, it could soon set a Space Age record for cold.”The new data is coming from NASA’s Sounding of the Atmosphere using Broadband Emission Radiometry or SABER instrument, which is onboard the space agency’s Thermosphere Ionosphere Mesosphere Energetics and Dynamics (TIMED) satellite. SABER monitors infrared radiation from carbon dioxide (CO2) and nitric oxide (NO), two substances that play a vital role in the energy output of our thermosphere, the very top level of our atmosphere.“The thermosphere always cools off during Solar Minimum. It’s one of the most important ways the solar cycle affects our planet,” said Mlynczak, who is the associate principal investigator for SABER.Who knew that that big yellow ball of light in the sky had such a big influence on our climate?There’s a bit of good news in all of this. When the thermosphere cools, it literally shrinks, therefore reducing aerodynamic drag on satellites in low Earth orbit. In effect, the shrinking thermosphere increases a satellite’s lifetime.But that appears to be where the good news ends, unless you prefer cold weather and increased space junk. “The bad news,” according to Dr. Tony Phillips, editor of SpaceWeather.com -- News and information about meteor showers, solar flares, auroras, and near-Earth asteroids -- News and information about meteor showers, solar flares, auroras, and near-Earth asteroids, is: “It also delays the natural decay of space junk, resulting in a more cluttered environment around Earth.”Mlynczak and his colleagues have created the Thermosphere Climate Index (TCI), which measures how much NO is dumped from the Thermosphere into outer space. During Solar Maximum the TCI number is very high. At times of Solar Minimum, TCI is low.“Right now, (TCI) is very low indeed,” said Mlynczak. “SABER is currently measuring 33 billion Watts of infrared power from NO. That’s ten times smaller than we see during more active phases of the solar cycle."SABER has been in orbit for only 17 years, but Mlynczak and the scientists at NASA’s Langley Research Center have been able to recreate TCI measurements back to the 1940s. “SABER taught us how to do this by revealing how TCI depends on other variables such as geomagnetic activity and the sun’s UV output — things that have been measured for decades,” said Mlynczak.In fact, TCI numbers now, in the closing months of 2018, are very close to setting record lows since measurements began. “We’re not quite there yet,” Mlynczak reports. “but it could happen in a matter of months.”The new NASA findings are in line with studies released by UC-San Diego and Northumbria University in Great Britain last year, both of which predict a Grand Solar Minimum in coming decades due to low sunspot activity. Both studies predicted sun activity similar to the Maunder Minimum of the mid-17th to early 18th centuries, which coincided to a time known as the Little Ice Age, during which temperatures were much lower than those of today.If all of this seems as if NASA is contradicting itself, you’re right — sort of. After all, NASA also reported last week that Arctic sea ice was at its sixth lowest level since measuring began. Isn’t that a sure sign of global warming?All any of this “proves” is that we have, at best, a cursory understanding of Earth’s incredibly complex climate system. So when mainstream media and carbon-credit salesman Al Gore breathlessly warn you that we must do something about climate change, it’s all right to step back, take a deep breath, and realize that we don’t have the knowledge, skill or resources to have much effect on the Earth’s climate. God — and that big yellow ball of light in the sky — have much more impact on our climate than we ever could.COMMENTSJames Matkin • The earth is actually cooling and NASA grudgingly begins to admit reality over the fiction of failed computer modelling by the iPCC. So much waste and damage from the futile attempt to reduce our Co2 emissions for a colder climate. The climate alarmists have ignored solar natural variability not because of the science but because of their left wing economic agenda. They have ignored leading science papers like the 400 page study THE NEGLECTED SUN Why the Sun Precludes Climate Catastrophe, by Professor Fritz Vahreholt and Dr. Sebastian Luning. This study demonstrates that "the critical cause of global temperature change has been, and continues to be, the sun's activity." As NASA admits the sun is in a cooling phase and the solar cycles make impossible "the catastrophic prospects put forward by the United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and the alarmist agenda dominant in contemporary Western politics."Jim_AZ • a month agoWell, see, it was all of our CO2 that made the Sun get colder.It was also probably responsible for the mental ailments which made the UN "scientists" commit Climate-Gate, repeatedly--And the cause of the media's lack of reasoning re to MMGW (and everything else).So, they should Still take away my money, so that they can afford to take away my choices and opportunities. I mean, it's only fair.NASA Sees Climate Cooling Trend Thanks to Low Sun ActivityRecord! China’s northwestern Qinghai Province receives biggest early winter snow in 57 yearsBy: PTI | Published: November 20, 2018 10:44 PMChina's northwestern Qinghai Province has witnessed record precipitation in the last 57 years as continuous snow swept the region since the beginning of November, a media report said Tuesday.The Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, known as the “roof of the world,” is an important region to monitor climate changes with the weather and the glaciers as indicators. (Reuters)China’s northwestern Qinghai Province has witnessed record precipitation in the last 57 years as continuous snow swept the region since the beginning of November, a media report said Tuesday. Snow accumulation between November 2 and 7 has reached 18 cm on the ground in Dulan County, Haixi Mongolian Tibet Autonomous Prefecture, where the height above mean sea-level averages 3,180 metres, the state-run Xinhua news agency reported.The Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, known as the “roof of the world,” is an important region to monitor climate changes with the weather and the glaciers as indicators.“Twenty-seven counties in Qinghai have seen the November snow set historical records. The provincial capital of Xining has seen precipitation reach 25.8 mm, also a record high,” said Ma Zhanliang, senior engineer with the provincial climate centre.China is keeping the meteorological records of the region for the last 57 years.He said the big snowfall was triggered by the collision of southward polar cold air and warm air from southern China.The provincial meteorological station warned that severe snowstorms and continuous cold weather would cause difficulties in road traffic, transport, agriculture and animal husbandry, the report said.Record cold temperatures are being set across the west as temperatures plunge in the first real dose of winter weather. The cold front is reaching from California all the way to Michigan and as far south as MexicoBritain faces FREEZING winters as slump in solar activity threatens 'little Ice Age'BRITAIN could face colder than average winters with a plunge in solar activity threatening a new "little ice age" in the next few decades.By NATHAN RAOPUBLISHED: 05:53, Wed, Jun 24, 2015 | UPDATED: 12:03, Wed, Jun 24, 2015Winter storm freezes the eastern U.S. with record coldPOSTED 11:29 AM, FEBRUARY 14, 2016, BY CNN WIRENEW YORK — So much for a warm and fuzzy Valentine’s Day. As many as 18 cities across the East could endure record-breaking cold Sunday, forecasters say.New York City’s temperature could plummet to 0 degrees Fahrenheit — shattering the record of 2 degrees set during World War I. Bridgeport, Conn., could suffer an all-time low of -1 degrees. Philadelphia could tie its record low of 2 degrees. And those are just the ‘real’ temperatures.And those are just the ‘real’ temperatures. Factor in brutal wind and every state from northern Pennsylvania to Maine will feel wind chills below -15 degrees.New York Mayor Bill de Blasio urged residents to brace for dangerous conditions.“The city is facing some of the coldest temperatures and wind chills we’ve seen in the last 20 years,” de Blasio said. “Extremely cold weather can be life-threatening — especially for seniors, infants and people with medical conditions.”Winter storm freezes the eastern U.S. with record coldAsia cold snap: Scores dead as freezing 'polar vortex' sweeps across eastern AsiaAsia's 'polar vortex' has seen some regions hit by their coldest weather for more than half a centuryAdam Withnall Jan. 25, 2016Scores dead as freezing 'polar vortex' sweeps across eastern AsiaAt least 57 people died, mostly hypothermia and cardiovascular disease, in Taiwan following a sudden drop in temperature over the weekend Getty ImagesMore than 60 people have died as a band of extreme cold weather spread across eastern Asia, stranding tens of thousands of tourists and bringing some regions their lowest temperatures for half a century.While much international attention has been focussed on the heavy snowfalls in the eastern US, another cold snap has descended over Korea, China, Hong Kong and Japan.Climate Scam Collapsing: ‘Reality Is Cooling…MORE Snowfall’Published on November 19, 2018Written by Tony HellerThe global warming scam is beginning to collapse. Even CBS News Boston is starting to understand.BOSTON (CBS) — Despite the snow blitz of 2015, many baby boomers still insist that, overall, we don’t get the harsh bitter cold and deep snowy winters like we did in the good ole days.Weather records prove that just isn’t the case and despite the ongoing claims that snows are becoming rare and hurting winter sports, this millennium has been a blessing to snow lovers and winter sports enthusiasts.The last decade stands out like a sore thumb! It has had 29 major impact northeast winter storms with NO previous 10-year period with more than 10 storms! In Boston, 7 out of the last 10 years have produced snowfall above the average 43.7 inches.2008-09: 65.9″2009-10: 35.7″2010-11: 81.0″2011-12: 9.3″2012-13: 63.4″2013-14: 58.9″2014-15: 110.6″ Greatest On Record Back To 18722015-16: 36.1″2016-17: 47.6″2017-18: 59.9″Principia Scientific Intl....MY CONCLUSION“It is not all clear that the warming we’ve seen is in any way caused by human activity. And to the extent some of it might be, the effect is likely small compared to natural variations. We are still emerging from the last ice age, and have been for thousands of years.”

No. People have good reason to deny climate change because the claims are wrong. We cannot see climate change as we do not live long enough therefore weather is the only observable climate. Weather is in constant change creating climate variability with a zigzag between hot and cold, but this variability is natural and is not climate change. No one denies weather but many wrongly claim some weather event like a hurricane, wild fire or winter snow story is climate change. This is wrong and impossible.For climate science the data most followed is temperature and yet it is surely the most unreliable at the global level. Also temperature has shown no evidence over the past 140 years of anything but natural variability.Yes don’t worry be happy! This just in - Writing in Real Clear Markets, Aaron Brown looked at the official NASA global temperature data and noticed something surprising. From February 2016 to February 2018, "global average temperatures dropped by 0.56 degrees Celsius." That, he notes, is the biggest two-year drop in the past century."The 2016-2018 Big Chill," he writes, "was composed of two Little Chills, the biggest five month drop ever (February to June 2016) and the fourth biggest (February to June 2017). A similar event from February to June 2018 would bring global average temperatures below the 1980s average."NO CLIMATE CHANGE IN TEMPERATURE.Temperature increases over the past 140 years are too small and within the range of natural variability to constitute human made global warming.NASA Goddard Institute finds warming of 0.8* Celsius (1.4* Fahrenheit) since 1880. This means an average of only 0.0175 degree Celsius temperature increase annually. This minute amount is within the statistical error of the data.No weather by itself is evidence of global warming/ climate change as the test is whether the weather adds to a new weather pattern over many years even millennia.Weather is observable such as rain, wind, snow, clouds, tornados and hurricanes when you look outside your kitchen window. Climate change on the other hand is not. It is a statistical fiction and not observable. Also temperature is a statistical fiction and not observable.You or no one else as ever observed climate change because we cannot sit at the window for centuries or more.Climate change occurs when changes in Earth's climate system result in new weather patterns that last for at least a few decades, and maybe for millions of years.WikipediaBy definition the term climate change is all about the time scale of data that confirms a breakthrough of ‘new weather patterns.’ This means weather is everything when it comes to understanding the climate and assessing whether the climate change has changed.Climate change is only a statistical fiction of math averages and cannot be observed yet these temperature averages used as a proxy for climate change. There is an irony that the most relied upon data for climate science are two key statistical fictions: temperature and climate change. This is undoubtedly why there is so little certainty in climate science.The science of measuring temperature is beyond complex and helps explain the over the top poor modelling of the climate by the UN IPCC.Earth’s temperature started going up BEFORE human emissions were significant.And then for 30 years, while human CO2 emissions grew 500%, Earth’s temperature went DOWN.And the when Earth started warming again, it did so, only at the rate that it had naturally, back in the earlier part of the century.Hardly the “fingerprint” of human influence that some would claim.THERE IS NO SINGLE VALUE FOR TEMPERATURE ONLY A TEMPERATURE FIELDThe physical phenomena in climate and weather are among the most complex in nature, and science can say very little about what they will do in the future. Yet a large international policy framework has been built precisely on the assumption that we know what is happening and how to control it. In TAKEN BY STORM,Christopher Essex and Ross McKitrick prove this assumption false, carefully explaining the science of climate change and deconstructing the widespread myth of global warming. They argue that the connection between science and society is disintegrating, and they propose a vital first step toward repairing this relationship.From Chapter 10 of Taken by Storm:?It is understandable that people think only a handful of ?marginal? critics have doubts {about global warming}. The critics, when not dismissed as ?contrarians,? are often referred to as ?skeptics.? ?They have also been called ?dissidents,? bringing to mind internal opponents of the Cold War Soviet Union. Lately, the terms ?deniers? and ?climate criminals? have become more common as the political nastiness has grown?We have shown, page after page, that certainty on the subject of the future direction of climate is impossible?that anyone who thinks we can predict the climate only courts the laughter of the gods.?In addition from the beginning data tampering has been rampant to try vainly to show more warming.Massive Data Tampering Uncovered At NASA – Warmth, Cooling Disappears Due To Incompatibility With ModelsBy Kenneth Richard on 16. January 2017Why Did NASA Eliminate The Early 20th Century Warming And Mid-20th Century Cooling?The fundamental reason why NASA has manipulated past temperature data is so that the historical climate record may conform to the IPCC models that presume variations in surface temperatures are predominantly determined by anthropogenic CO2 emissions. Fossil fuels consumption in particular and anthropogenic CO2 emissions in general plodded along steadily at about 1 GtC/year (gigatons of carbon per year) during the 1900 to 1945 period. Then, after 1945, human emissions exploded. They reached 4 GtC/year by the 1970s, 6 GtC/year by the 1990s, and 10 GtC/year by 2014.Massive Data Tampering Uncovered At NASA - Warmth, Cooling Disappears Due To Incompatibility With ModelsThe scientists finding global warming were fooled by randomness and short term dataThe debate about the relevance of winter weather starts with the fact those who have advanced the global warming hypothesis have predicted as evidence that winters will be moderate with little or no snow as the climate gets hotter.I will show many references so many that it has been alleged that as many as 97% of warmists saw a snowless future for the planet. They could not be more wrong.The truth showing colder winters everywhere with massive snowfall must be relevant to discredit the hypothesis industry is making the climate too hot.The UN and alarmist scientists put the state of winter weather in play. They predicted moderate winters without snow would be the key evidence validating their hypothesis denying Mother Nature controls the climate. It is believed that 97% of scientists followed the UN on this false premise as well as every major media group.Snowfall will become “A very rare and exciting event…Children just aren’t going to know what snow is.”Dr David Viner – Senior scientist, climatic research unit (CRU)The prediction that “children just aren’t going to know what snow is” was made by Dr David Viner, a senior research scientist at the Climatic Research Unit (CRU) of the University of East Anglia, in the year 2000. It could not be more wrong and is evidence that the new weather pattern of global warming/ climate change is not happening.NOAA Predicted an ice free summer Arctic 2085.Here is a key graph by NOAA, a government agency, how the future global warming should impact the Arctic. Arctic melting buying the false hype a model simulation showing the Arctic future according to the alarmists. First in 1885 showing Aug, Sept and Oct average ice concentration and concluding in 2085 with NO SNOW left after the expected summer melt. WRONG WRONG WRONG. This is amazingly bad science for a government agency. It is the most relevant evidence of how the weather mattered if it was SNOW to alarmism.It gets worse as actual climate fails to cooperate with the radical alarmism denying nature. For example the warming historically of the Medieval Warm period rebutted the claim that current warming is unprecedented. The solution from junior scientist Michael Mann is get rid of history.James Hansen was a leading alarmist scientist who regularly changed historical temperature data to make current data warmer than it was.The cheating and fudging of the truth has been aimed in one direction everytime - to hide the fact the warming is not happening. This motive is understandable when the goal is to scare the public into thinking believe the earth is burning up with end of winters and snow.BUT MOTHER NATURE REFUSED TO GO ALONG WITH THE HOAX.PHOTOS OF THE ARCTIC 1979, 2012 AND 2017 COMPARED TO 79 LEVELS.Largest Increase In November 2018 Sea Ice Volume On RecordPosted on December 13, 2018 by tonyhellerThe increase in Arctic sea ice volume during November was the largest on record.Understanding the relevance of the snow albedo is keyAlbedo is an expression of the ability of surfaces to reflect sunlight (heat from the sun). Light-coloured surfaces return a large part of the sunrays back to the atmosphere (high albedo). Dark surfaces absorb the rays from the sun (low albedo).As the simple graph shows snow reflects 85% of sunlight back into space making the climate cooler.Ice- and snow-covered areas have high albedo, and an ice-covered Arctic reflects solar radiation which otherwise would be absorbed by the oceans and cause the Earth's surface to heat up. The proportion of the Earth's surface that is covered by snow and ice has a great deal to say for how much of the incoming solar radiation is reflected or absorbed. Low albedo (dark surfaces) leads to higher uptake of energy and, hence, warming. Moreover, when more ice and snow melt, there will be more dark surfaces. This is therefore a self-reinforcing effect. Climate change in the Arctic is consequently important for the development of climate change globally.http://www.npolar.no/en/facts/al...Norwegian Polar InstituteALBEDO is often key in academic articles about Climate Change. For example, in this paper research finds as the Albedo declines the temperature increases melting mountains etc.Recent Northern Hemisphere snow cover extent trends and implications for the snow‐albedo feedbackStephen J. Déry Ross D. BrownFirst published: 27 November 2007https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL03...1. Introduction[2] Snow cover over the Northern Hemisphere (NH) ranges, on average, from a minimum extent of 2 × 106 km each August to a maximum extent of 45 × 106km each January or nearly one half of the NH land surface [Lemke et al., 2007]. Because of its large seasonal variability and distinctive physical properties, snow plays a major role in the climate system through strong positive feedbacks related to albedo [e.g., Groisman et al., 1994a] and other weaker feedbacks related to moisture storage, latent heat, and insulation of the underlying surface [Stieglitz et al., 2003]. The snow‐albedo feedback, along with the ice‐albedo feedback, is invoked as a leading cause of amplified warming in polar and mountainous regions [Serreze and Francis, 2006; Fyfe and Flato, 1999]. Consistent with this hypothesis, changes in snow cover duration during the first and second halves of the hydrological year over 1967–2004 show a contrasting seasonal response, with the largest decreases occurring in spring over mainly NH high elevations [Robinson and Dewey, 1990; Groisman et al., 1994a; Fyfe and Flato, 1999].Recent Northern Hemisphere snow cover extent trends and implications for the snow‐albedo feedbackEasy to see why glaciers expand when the Albedo / snow cover is so bright.As the Arctic expands with increased ice and snow the albedo is triggered and that makes the temperature colder like we witnessed this year. The snow albedo from the Arctic is a loop where snow makes is colder which makes more snow which makes it colder and so on. This is surely a more common sense explanation than the bizarre unproved theory that global warming causes the shift in Arctic air.Also there are major science peer reviewed papers that identify the ALBEDO as the cause of this unique cooling.To realize how significant the snow albedo impact on temperature can be consider this evidence of our climate past.“The Earth is currently in an interglacial period of an ice age that started about two and a half million years ago. The Earth’s current ice age is primarily caused by Antarctica drifting over the South Pole 30 million years ago. This meant that a large area of the Earth’s surface changed from being very low-albedo ocean to highly reflective ice and snow. “https://wattsupwiththat.com/2009...An extreme ice age hit the planet around 717 million years ago. Known as the Sturtian glaciation, this event is more informally dubbed "Snowball Earth" and it's thought to be the most extreme, and long-lasting, ice age the planet ever experienced. For around 50 million years, the entire globe was essentially covered in ice.https://newatlas.com/rise-of-algae-snowball-earth-animal-evolution/50934/#gallerySnowball Earth - Wikipediahttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sn...The Snowball Earth hypothesis proposes that during one or more of Earth's icehouse climates, .... According to modelling, an ice–albedo feedback would result in glacial ice rapidly ..... The increase in Earth's coverage of snow and ice would in turn increase Earth's albedo, which would result in positive feedback for cooling.The research about the causes snowball earth continues and includes Harvard science paper pointing to major volcanic impacts in addition to snow albedo.SNOW : Setting The Record StraightPosted: November 12, 2018 | Author: Jamie Spry | Filed under: Alarmism Debunked,|1 CommentSNOWTHE problem with lying or perpetuating a scam is that you have to be aware of the spin you’ve spun to get you there.IN the realm of climate and weather, you pray to god (or Gaia) that the prognostications and rules, as laid out by the “97%” of ‘experts’, come to fruition or go close enough to bolster your alarmist position.CLIMATE and weather outcomes vary greatly, depending on many factors, most of which we are yet to fully understand. Perhaps if ever, owing to the fact that “The climate system is a coupled non-linear chaotic system, and therefore the long-term prediction of future climate states is not possible.” (IPCC TAR 2001)WITH that in mind, it is feasible and encouraged to identify errors in predictions. From this we can identify uncertainty in order to sharpen hypothesis and curb costly hysteria.*SNOWA good example of climate predictions gone awry is in the area of snow.“97%” of venerated ‘scientific’ institutions in concert with the warmist mainstream media were predicting the end of snow…IN 2000, climate expert Dr David Viner of the University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit(CRU) assured us that :SNOWFALL Will Become “A Very Rare And Exciting Event…” | ClimatismIN 2001, the UN IPCC predicted diminished snowfalls as human CO2 increased, claiming that “milder winter temperatures will decrease heavy snowstorms” due to the activities ofmankindpersonkind…IPCC – Intergovernmental Panel on Climate ChangeTHEY also forecast “warmer winters and fewer cold spells, because of climate change…”warmer-winters-ipcc*THE “97% of Experts” Agreed Too!2000 : a prediction from Professor Mojib Latif of Germany’s GEOMAR Heimholtz Centre for Ocean Research…“Winters with strong frosts and lots of snow like we had 20 years ago will no longer exist at our latitudes.” – Professor Mojib Latif2000 : Spiegel…“Good bye winter. Never again snow?”2004 : Mark Lynas told us…“Snow has become so rare that when it does fall – often just for a few hours – everything grinds to a halt. In early 2003 a ‘mighty’ five-centimetre snowfall in southeast England caused such severe traffic jams that many motorists had to stay in their cars overnight. Today’s kids are missing out . . . Many of these changes are already underway, but have been accelerating over the last two decades. Termites have already moved into southern England. Garden centres are beginning to stock exotic sub-tropical species, which only a few years ago would have been killed off by winter…” – Mark Lynas2005 : Christopher Krull, Black Forest Tourism Association / Spiegel…Planning for a snowless future: “Our study is already showing that that there will be a much worse situation in 20 years.”2005 : George Monbiot on climate change and snow…Winter is no longer the great grey longing of my childhood. The freezes this country suffered in 1982 and 1963 are – unless the Gulf Stream stops – unlikely to recur. Our summers will be long and warm. Across most of the upper northern hemisphere, climate change, so far, has been kind to us…2006 : Daniela Jacob of Max Planck Institute for Meterology, Hamburg …“Yesterday’s snow… Because temperatures in the Alps are rising quickly, there will be more precipitation in many places. But because it will rain more often than it snows, this will be bad news for tourists. For many ski lifts this means the end of business.”Less Snow and Drier Summers in German Forecast | Germany| News and in-depth reporting from Berlin and beyond | DW | 30.04.20062006 : The Independent‘s somber editorial admonished us that the lack of snow was evidence of a “dangerous seasonal disorder”…The countryside is looking rather peculiar this winter. It seems we have a number of unexpected guests for Christmas. Dragonflies, bumblebees and red admiral butterflies, which would normally be killed off by the frost, can still be seen in some parts of the country . . . Some might be tempted to welcome this late blossoming of the natural world as a delightful diversion from the bleakness of this time of year. But these fluctuations should be cause for concern because it is overwhelmingly likely that they are a consequence of global warming . . . all this is also evidence that global warming is occurring at a faster rate than many imagined…2007 : BBC “One Planet Special”…“It Seems the Winters of Our Youth are Unlikely to Return” presenter Richard Hollingham … speaks to climate scientists to get their views. Their conclusion? In the words of the BBC, they all give “predictions of warmer winters, for UK & the Northern Hemisphere”.2007 : Schleswig Holstein NABU…“Ice, snow, and frost will disappear, i.e. milder winters” … “Unusually warm winters without snow and ice are now being viewed by many as signs of climate change.”2007 : Western Mail (Wales Online) … article, entititled “Snowless Winters Forecast for Wales as World Warms Up” quotes one of the global warming movement’s key figures, Sir John Houghton, former head of the IPCC and former head of the UK Met Office…Former head of the Met Office Sir John Houghton, who is one of the UK’s leading authorities on climate change, said all the indicators suggest snowy winters will become increasingly rare He said, “Snowlines are going up in altitude all over the world. The idea that we will get less snow is absolutely in line with what we expect from global warming.”2007 : Die Zeit…“First the snow disappears, and then winter.”2008 : Another prediction…A study of snowfall spanning 60 years has indicated that the Alps’s entire winter sports industry could grind to a halt through lack of snow…. In some years the amount that fell was 60 per cent lower than was typical in the early 1980s, said Christoph Marty, from the Swiss Federal Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research in Davos, who analysed the records. ”I don’t believe we will see the kind of snow conditions we have experienced in past decades,” he said.2014 : the global warming theory-obsessed New York Times touted “The End of Snow?”…“The truth is, it is too late for all of that. Greening the ski industry is commendable, but it isn’t nearly enough. Nothing besides a national policy shift on how we create and consume energy will keep our mountains white in the winter — and slow global warming to a safe level.This is no longer a scientific debate. It is scientific fact. The greatest fear of most climate scientists is continued complacency that leads to a series of natural climatic feedbacks…”(Climatism bolds)The End of Snow? – The New York TimesCold and snow in South AfricaHistory of Snow in South Africa 2010 to 2018 https://www.google.ca/search?q=south+africa+snowfall&client=safari&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj-xMyy587hAhVoIjQIHfuXDi0Q_AUIDigB&biw=2432&bih=1305#imgrc=ZBkDACU6xgWFJM:US hit with unusual May snow stormA potent late-April snowstorm is forecast to dump up to 9 inches of snow across a 1,200-mile stripe of the Midwest and Great Lakes states over the weekend."A stripe of heavy snow is forecast this weekend from eastern South Dakota across a portion of the Upper Midwest into southern lower Michigan," the National Weather Service said.Winter storm watches have been posted by the National Weather Service for parts of Montana as well as southeastern Minnesota, northern Iowa and southern Wisconsin, the Weather Channel reported. More than 4 million people live where winter storm watches have been posted.The weather service office in La Crosse, Wisconsin, said that hourly snow rates could be in the 1 to 2 inch per hour range at times. If this occurs, a slushy snow accumulation would make travel difficult."The biggest cities to see significant snow are in Wisconsin, including Madison (4-8 inches) and Milwaukee (2-6 inches.)Because temperature change and climate change are only statistical concepts beyond the pale of actual observation the temptation to fudge the statistics is rampant in the recent history. The most startling deception engineered by Michael Mann and others was to make temperature data over the past 100 years look unprecedented. The device for this tampering was the erasure of the temperature records of the Medieval Warming Period and the Little Ice Age to create the infamous hockey stick graph of warming. The new temperature record then looked very alarming and became the fodder for Al Gore’s Inconvenient Truth video winning him a Nobel Prize and millions of dollars.Lawrence Solomon: Finally it's safe for the whistleblowers of corrupted climate science to speak outThe greatest scientific fraud of the century will be laid bare, along with its corrupt enablers in government, academia, industry and the mediaLawrence SolomonFebruary 16, 20173:26 PM ESTFiled underWhistleblowers at the U.S. government’s official keeper of the global warming stats, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), claim their agency doctored temperature data to hide the fact that global temperatures plateaued almost 20 years ago.Can the whistleblowers be believed in this claim, originally made in 2015? And in the further claim that NOAA then rushed this doctored data into print in time for the UN’s Paris global warming summit of world leaders, to dupe any doubters that the planet was in fact overheated?Of course the whistleblowers can be believed, and not just because NOAA repeatedly stonewalled inquiries, even failing to comply with a congressional subpoena. No one paying attention can have any doubt that the governmental global warming enterprise has been a fraud. It’s been lies from the start, starting with the very mandate of the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which astonishingly ruled out factors like the sun as being worthy of investigation.Among those astonished was the Danish delegation to the IPCC. It discovered at one of the IPCC’s early meetings a quarter-century ago that its scientists could not present their study, newly published in the prestigious journal Science, showing a remarkable correlation between global warming and solar activity. To their further astonishment, to squelch dissent the IPCC cabal set out to destroy the reputation of its chief author, falsely accusing him of fabricating data.Whistleblowers now know they will no longer be silenced.Dissenters from the climate change orthodoxy soon learned that, if they refused to recant, they stood to lose their jobs, their funding, and their reputations. They also learned the corollary: to get hired, to get funded, to get promoted, they needed to produce the science the authorities wanted. Governments annually spent billions of dollars on climate change research, virtually all of it commissioned to prove that the science was settled — that man-made climate change represented an existential threat to the planet.None of the billions spent on research amounted to anything — none of the models proved reliable, none of the predictions were borne out, none of the expected effects materialized. The Arctic ice cap hasn’t disappeared, polar bear populations haven’t declined, hurricanes haven’t become more common, malaria hasn’t spread, temperatures haven’t continued to climb. What did materialize was fraud after fraud.Climategate — the 2009 revelations of hacked emails showing scientists labouring to manipulate data and cover their tracks — was followed by Climategate 2.0 (a second damning batch of hacked emails), by Amazongate (the revelation that the IPCC’s claim of coming devastation in the Amazon was based on non-peer-reviewed research by WWF eco-activists), Glaciergate (here the IPCC relied on speculation in a popular magazine) and other scandals.The mega-fraud was the assertion that the science was settled, which the IPCC trumpeted with claims that 2,500 scientists from around the world endorsed its findings. Except those 2,500 — a number that was soon inflated to 3,000 and then 4,000 — didn’t endorse anything. They merely reviewed some of the studies heaved into the IPCC’s maw, many of them giving the research the thumbs down.Likewise, a much heralded claim that 97 per cent of scientists believed the planet was overheating came from a 2008 master’s thesis by a student at the University of Illinois who obtained her results by conducting a survey of 10,257 earth scientists, then discarding the views of all but 77 of them. Of those 77 scientists, 75 thought humans contributed to climate change. The ratio 75/77 produced the 97-per-cent figure that global warming activists then touted.In fact, major surveys show that scientists in the tens of thousands do not believe that global warming represents a threat. With the departure of president Obama and his administration, which had blocked independent investigations from being pursued, whistleblowers in greater numbers will now dare to come forward, knowing they will no longer be silenced.One of them is Dr. John Bates, a recently retired principal scientist at NOAA, who described how his agency manipulated data to manufacture a non-existent increase in global temperatures. In a press release last week, U.S. House Science, Space, and Technology Committee chairman Lamar Smith thanked “Dr. John Bates for courageously stepping forward to tell the truth about NOAA’s senior officials playing fast and loose with the data in order to meet a politically predetermined conclusion.” This week a second press release from the same committee indicated that NOAA will be brought to account.The blizzard of lies from NOAA and other corrupted agencies will soon be outed in excruciating detail. The greatest scientific fraud of the century will thus be laid bare, along with its craven and corrupt enablers in government, academia, industry and the media.Lawrence Solomon is executive director of Energy Probe, a Toronto-based environmental group.Lawrence Solomon: Finally it’s safe for the whistleblowers of corrupted climate science to speak out