Specifications For Architectural Review: Fill & Download for Free

LPU is amongst the Top 5 School of Architecture, Design, and Planning disciplines in India and the top 100 schools globally by 2025 by becoming a Center of design excellence in Academics, Consultancy, and Research. also, LPU School of Architecture and Design is among Punjab's best colleges and ranked among the top ten promising architecture institutes of India by Higher Education Review. and the proud thing is The Architecture Programmes are approved by the Council of Architecture (COA), a statutory body of the Government of India for the regulation of the architectural education and practice of the profession as required.Students are taken to regular industrial visits for giving a vision to their knowledge of the latest construction techniques and implement them into their design projects. Students are taken on educational tours like recently Architecture Students documented the buildings and learning from Live Case Examples during experiential learning week LPU focuses more on case studies and Case-based teaching to generate skills in analytical thinking, soft skills, etc. LPU students also got a chance to interact with World-Renowned Architect B. V. Doshi (one of the most important figures in South Indian Architecture.)at his working abode in Sangath, Ahmedabad. similarly department of Architecture, LSAD conducted an expert lecture on ArJit Kumar, Chairman of the Indian Green Building Council, Chandigarh for Architecture students to share his experience, concepts, and technical specifications of Green Architecture Buildings. So basically LPU keeps on conducting such types of workshops seminars and events where students get to learn from prominent personalities. And B. Arch student got placed at CP Kukreja Architects, New Delhi which is amongst the top 100 Architectural Firms in the World. Anushka Sharma ( B.Arch, Batch 2014-2019) has been placed for an internship in Dharamalya institute of compassionate living. Didi Contractor- a Renowned architect and a Lifetime Achievement Awardee, specializing in traditional eco-friendly earthen construction methods of the Himalayas one of the key advisors of the institute. there are a lot of examples like thisother than all these students gets a lot of exposure, witness huge diversity, opportunities, internship opportunities, and much more.I hope this helps :)

Don't manage, guide. IQ and experience are two attributes you want your team members to over-index on, but there are plenty of other attributes that also matter including judgment, work ethic, communication skills, and teamwork. Unlike raw IQ, these are things that can be developed in any employee. Your job is to provide individualized guidance to each of your team members in the areas where they need to develop.Here are other some general tips for guiding strong engineers.Guide what they build, not how they build. As a manager, your job is to make sure your engineering team is working on the most important things. Your idea of what is most important will often differ from theirs, so you need to spend some time explaining why you feel your priorities are the right ones and letting them make the case for theirs. Once you're agreed on priorities and the outcomes you need, give them latitude to decide how they achieve them.Ask probing questions. Ask them what their design optimizes for, what their availability target is, what the latency requirements are, why they chose a particular persistence layer, why they chose the specific language. Ask them what the standard in your company is for X or Y, and why they chose to diverge from the standard. Doing so will educate you, and also give you an opportunity to spot potential inconsistencies in their design or fuzzy thinking in general.Connect them with very senior engineers even smarter or experienced than they are, and set up a process to leverage that experience. This supports your engineers' learning and development and also ensures that their designs get an adequate architectural review if you're not equipped to do so.Mediate arguments and (too) long-running discussions. Strong engineers have confidence in their design and coding judgment and are inclined to get into debates with other engineers about the right way to do things. This is productive, to a point, but at some point it starts becoming unproductive and can create tension. Your job as a manager is to find ways to short-circuit arguments and long-running debates, which may mean listening to diverging viewpoints and then making a decision. If you're not equipped to make the decision than find a path to do so, which might mean reviewing with a very senior engineer not on your team and letting them make the decision.Continue to hire team members smarter than you. You may want to balance a team of mostly experienced engineers with some more junior engineers, but you always want to hire for high raw technical IQ. Hiring an engineer is a long-term decision. Don't relax your standards in order to fill an engineering role quickly.Manage out poor performers. Strong engineers don't like to work with weak ones. If you don't manage out poor performers your team will accumulate them and your strong performers will move on to other teams or companies.

There are several lists of the “Tops” out there, and would be well worth reviewing those for their listings. The Architectural Record lists the top ten as being Cornell, Rice, Cal Poly, Syracuse, Cooper, RISD, Pratt, Virginia Tech, SCIA and UT Austin. Interestingly, they then show the rankings over time, which gives one a sense as to the specific reputation stability of one school over another. In the 9-year rankings, Cornell is consistently rated #1, Rice fluctuates between 2 to 5, and so on through the list.Truth of it is, any one of the top ten would be decent. What one needs to do is to look at the specific programs… for me, when applying back in the dark ages, the criteria included:was the school founded as an independent school, or was it spun out of a Fine Arts or Engineering school? Is it still a subsidiary of another school, rather than retaining its own robust founding?What is the academic reputation of the University i which the Architecture program is embedded?What is the physical environment of the school? Is it out in the countryside? part of a fascinating urban context?What is the social life for students on campus/off campus? Is this a small academic setting, gi-normous, “Greek Culture”, or ?????Will note that, again, back in the dark ages, I applied to Cornell, Rice, Pratt, University of Michigan and two “Safety Schools”. Was admitted to all but UM, ended up going to Rice…. While I was at Rice, they initiated their highly reputed “Preceptorship Program”, in which, between one’s fourth and fifth year of academic study, one spent a year working as an intern at a highly reputed architectural firm - This provides one with a massively different approach towards one’s final year, and it also provides the student with a “brand name” work experience when one graduates and hits the job market. For most of my classmates (me included) shifting from Rice to NYC, Boston, Philly, Chicago, SF - for internships at nationally known firms with high records for design awards was a professional platform game-changer. I returned to the firm I worked for i Philly following my final year, and then used that firm as a patform for further professional development, including attending grad school, teaching, etc..Rice also has NO frats or sororities.. they have a residential college system that provides social context without some of the (sometimes challenging) social “selectiveness” of the Greek system…..