Declaration Copyright Agreement Form: Fill & Download for Free

Yes.During the late evening of May 17, 2019 on my twitter timeline, I retweeted @MunaHawaa and her AJ+ video entitled "Let's Talk About the Holocaust". We retained that video as per "the Fair Use Allowance for educational, research, and commentary purposes under the Fair Use Act Copyright Disclaimer law under section 107 of Copyright Act of 1976.” I have attached here the audio of the video with our translations from American Islamic Forum for Democracy. Al Jazeera is trying to scrub the net of this defining ideology for their Islamists. In the interest of getting you the information, we are starting with just the audio. We hope to post the video later. This is the audio and we hope to have the video available once we understand how they are getting them removed.This video isn't a one-off and simply brings in to one defining place many common radical antisemitic conspiracy theories that so many Islamists propagate on the AlJazeera network, Qatar’s state media and global radicalization arm.The slick video, like others at AJ+, obviously timed to support the recent and similar radicalism of Congressowman @RashidaTlaib (D-MI) involved many production staff and approving eyes at AlJazeera. This video is a teaching moment for the world about the theocratic, inhuman #Islamistworld view of the Muslim Brotherhood and its allies and its inherent radicalization.The following is a full English translation of the video provided by AIFD (@aifdemocracy) a member of the Muslim Reform Movement(@TheMuslimReform).Qatar's state media arm tries to claim this video "didn't meet their editorial standards" and wants everyone to just scurry along, dismiss it, and expunge the 10,000s of views and shares already- never mind all the unscathed tyrannical mindsets that created them still left with no antiseptic of sunlight.Even shades of the ideas their radical 'talent' produced are emblematic of rampant Islamist supremacism and antisemitism of the Ikhwan (Muslim Brotherhood) that must be and can only be confronted by us Muslims.The following is a rather complete translation of the original audio from the AJ+ video noted above:BEGIN TRANSLATION:Let’s Talk About the Holocaust:Six million Jews were killed at the hands of Nazis. It’s a story that was adopted by Zionists and has been recalled every year in what is called the “Commemoration of the Holocaust”.Come with us to discuss with you on the “story of the Holocaust”“Holocaust” is a Greek word that means devastation by burning and it refers to the genocide of the Jewish race by the Nazis. It also refers to sacrifice for God in the old teachings of Judaism. They were burned completely in the slaughter.More than 9 million Jews resided in Europe before WWII. Most of them were in countries under Nazi control. After the Holocaust, members of the Zionist movement claim that 2 out of 3 Jews were killed. M Zuhdi JasserFalse. That number was the Nazis’ own estimate. [1]So why and how did this all happen?Let’s go back through the history.Germany lost WWI and with poverty, the Nazi party was formed. The notion of change to a better lifestyle strengthened the Nazi party and made them take advantage of two thoughts:First, was the superiority of the Aryan race. Simply, Germany was the preferred nation standing on the head and sequence of an entire people.Second, was a modern Germany built on nationalism. This was a creed that was spreading in Europe at that time. Its roots of colonialism viewed the Asian and African races in a condescending (superior) way. Based on that, they viewed every non-Aryan race as beneath them because of either their low socioeconomic status or because they were not accepted politically.That means that Jews were not the only victims during this period. The Nazis targeted the Gypsies of Europe, Slavic people, and some Arabs, and some other minority groups including socialists, gays, and the mentally ill. Some of the victims included Christians. These groups were mistreated before the Holocaust and they (the Nazis) wanted the “Final Solution”.They burned their books and fired them from their jobs, and confiscated their assets. They were kicked out of their homes and sent to concentration camps. They were forced to wear the Nazi symbols on their clothes. They were forced to work hard labor jobs, almost to death in some situations.Hitler’s victims exceeded 20 million people, and the Jews were part of them.So why are we focused on making this a Jewish issue only?The reason is that Jews had a lot of wealth, access to the media, and representation in academia. Therefore, they were able to portray themselves as the main victims of the Nazis. M Zuhdi JasserDo I need to explain how toxic this is?There are various perceptions of the Holocaust that have developed throughout history. People are divided into a few groups. Some people deny the Holocaust entirely. Some exaggerate the outcome, and some blame the Zionist movement for inflating it in order to form the country of Israel.Here we will stop.How did Israel benefit from the Holocaust?During the first few months of Nazi rule, the Zionists and the German Nazis formed the Haavara agreement in 1933. Its goal is to make it easy for Jews to immigrate to Palestine under the condition that they leave their assets to Germany. That’s the only known historical formal agreement. Even though it was criticized by many sides, it empowered more than 60,000 Jews to immigrate to Palestine between 1933 and 1939 and opened the door for immigration by others. M Zuhdi JasserThose 60,000 Jews escaped being gassed in Sobibor. What is there to criticize about saving 60,000 innocent lives?No other country was willing to take them!Immigration (of Jews) doubled with the rise of the Nazis until the time of the Palestinian Nakba (Catastrophe) in 1948. M Zuhdi JasserWhat event is skipped over here? Oh yes, the mass murder of the Jews and why they were immigrating, or as a more honest answer might be, why they fled for their lives from genocide.This agreement and other factors show that Hitler supported Zionism. This led the Mayor of London to publicly declare that Hitler was behind the Zionist movement, which led to his resignation from the Labor Party in 2016. The narrative of the Holocaust, its torture and suffering of the Jews, made it easier to open the path for them to immigrate to Palestine. M Zuhdi JasserStripping 60,000 Jews of their money and citizenship in exchange for their lives isn’t support for Zionism. It’s just called ethnic cleansing. Would AJ have preferred those Jews be gassed?And the “narrative” of the Holocaust and its torture and suffering? You mean, REALITY?I’ll skip over the grand finale.Rejecting the Holocaust is a moral obligation, but Israel is the largest winner of the Holocaust because they justify the ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians with the same justification that the Nazis used to kill the Jews.The ideology upon which the state of Israel was established is on religious, national and geographic premises that stemmed from the Nazi belief (spirit) and its initial foundations.How can the Palestinians condemn a crime that became their own misery?CREDITS/ AJ+Presented by: Muna HawwaPhotography by: Hadi ZanjeeMontage: Julie AlhajjLanguage Supervision: Amer Alsayed OmarEND TRANSLATION M Zuhdi JasserAccording to Al Jazeera, Israel is a “winner” of the Holocaust and benefited from the mass murder of its own citizens. And of course, comparing the genocide of the Jews with a conflict.This is just putridly evil lies.Biased is too kind.Evil is a better term.Not a fan of Canary Mission, but the video is pretty damning.Footnotes[1] Holocaust facts: Where does the figure of 6 million victims come from?

Copyright is not like other intellectual property, compared to patents or trademarks.You probably need a basic understanding of different kinds of intellectual property to understand this going forward.Here’s my 50,000 foot view, and then a more in depth answer on your specific copyright question.Patents.If you get a patent, it’s first to patent, although it’s possible to show prior art and parallel development, it quickly becomes expensive.Prior art is a big deal; the patent for the laser was initially granted to someone else, because the inventor believed it was still required to reduce an invention to practice. Eventually, the patent was re-awarded to the original inventor.Trademarks and service marks.If you get a trademark, or a service mark, then that is first to register; it can get fuzzy around the edges, however.For example, Apple Corps, the holding company established by the Beatles for their Apple Records label sued Apple Computer, and they settled for $80,000 and an agreement by Apple Computer to stay out of the music industry.When Apple Computer, Inc. started getting into music, by adding MIDI support to the Apple II GS in 1986, they were sued again.So these things apply to limited domains, and how limited — or not — those domains end up being tends to be determined by “who has the bigger wallet”.Trade secrets.A trade secret is a secret, like the formula for Coca-cola, or the recipe for Kentucky Fried Chicken.Trade secrets may be shared with “a select group”, so long as it’s limited; once a trade secret is disclosed, it’s no longer a secret, and no longer protected. While you can, in theory, pursue damages against a trade secret discloser — as a practical matter, you may get a “cease and desist” out of it, and your damages will be limited by the depth of the discloser’s pockets.Trade secrets are usually used for things you would have patented or copyright, but for which they pass neither the patent “obviousness” test — making them non-patentable — nor the copyright “triviality” test — making their copyright possible, but generally useless.Copyright.Copyright attaches immediately, as soon as you “reduce it to tangible form”.Copyright has a number of exceptions:Triviality; something which is trivial may not be copyright, as it does not meet the originality requirement. The originality requirement, however, is a pretty low bar, and in the case of software, has only been ruled in favor of the defendant in a small number of cases.Expressive alternatives; even if you implement a completely novel algorithm, it may not be copyrightable, if there are no expressive alternatives. This has also only been ruled on in a small number of cases.Fair Use Doctrine; fair use allows for use of excerpts for research, criticism, or educational purposes. The music industry is pretty good at getting things declared “not fair use”; again: it comes down to the relative size of the wallets involved.Simultaneity; it’s possible to simultaneously develop something that someone else has also developed, and for the timing and documentation to be close enough that both you and they could conceivably register copyright at the same time. It’s pretty rare.An important consideration in copyright is reduction to tangible form.Patents may be lost internationally by disclosure; in other words, publication results in you not being able to file for a patent in another jurisdiction under some circumstances.Copyright — this is not the case. Copyright attaches on reduction to tangible form: you write it on a piece of paper, it’s yours under copyright law.In the specific case of your question, you would need to be able to prove provenance.This is sometimes hard to do; in most dispute cases, in fact: it’s very hard to do.For computer programs and content, it’s pretty common to use a CMS (Content Management System) or an SCCS (Source Code Control System) whose date stamps could be used to prove time of origin for the copyrighted material.Like lab notebooks in a patent dispute case, they provide documentation.This is much harder to do with random thoughts on paper, where you and someone else happened to hit the same zeitgeist, and come up with the same sentence or few sentences.If you have a conflict in copyright — or any other intellectual property — you should probably consult an intellectual property attorney.P.S.: keep a CMS, SCCS, or lab journal, or just a journal, as appropriate; without that, it’s going to be your word against theirs, if you are ever in a dispute.

Explained: Everything you need to know about Nagaland insurgencyExplained: Everything you need to know about Nagaland insurgencyThe story of the long-running Naga insurgency — and peace moves that picked up pace with the efforts of Prime Ministers from P V Narasimha Rao to Narendra ModiSamudra Gupta KashyapPraveen SwamiUpdated: August 4, 2015 7:47 pmPrime Minister Narendra Modi with Union Home Minister Rajnath Singh, NSCN (IM) General Secretary, Thuingaleng Muivah, NSA, Ajit Doval and others at the signing ceremony of historic peace accord between Government of India & NSCN, in New Delhi on Monday. (Source; PTI)HOW OLD IS THE NAGA POLITICAL ISSUE?The British annexed Assam in 1826, and in 1881, the Naga Hills too became part of British India. The first sign of Naga resistance was seen in the formation of the Naga Club in 1918, which told the Simon Commission in 1929 “to leave us alone to determine for ourselves as in ancient times”. In 1946 came the Naga National Council (NNC), which, under the leadership of Angami Zapu Phizo, declared Nagaland an independent state on August 14, 1947. The NNC resolved to establish a “sovereign Naga state” and conducted a “referendum” in 1951, in which “99 per cent” supported an “independent” Nagaland.WHEN DID THE ARMED MOVEMENT BEGIN?On March 22, 1952, Phizo formed the underground Naga Federal Government (NFG) and the Naga Federal Army (NFA). The Government of India sent in the Army to crush the insurgency and, in 1958, enacted the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act.WHEN DID THE PEACE EFFORTS START?Almost simultaneously with the resistance. On June 29, 1947, Assam Governor Sir Akbar Hyderi signed a 9-point agreement with moderates T Sakhrie and Aliba Imti, which was almost immediately rejected by Phizo. The Naga Hills, a district of Assam, was upgraded to a state in 1963, by also adding the Tuensang Tract that was then part of NEFA. In April the next year, Jai Prakash Narain, Assam Chief Minister Bimala Prasad Chaliha and Rev. Michael Scott formed a Peace Mission, and got the government and NNC to sign an agreement to suspend operations that September. But the NNC/NFG/NFA continued to indulge in violence, and after six rounds of talks, the Peace Mission was abandoned in 1967, and a massive counter-insurgency operation launched.WHEN DID THE NSCN COME INTO BEING?On November 11, 1975, the government got a section of NNC leaders to sign the Shillong Accord, under which this section of NNC and NFG agreed to give up arms. A group of about 140 members led by Thuingaleng Muivah, who were at that time in China, refused to accept the Shillong Accord, and formed the National Socialist Council of Nagaland in 1980. Muivah also had Isak Chisi Swu and S S Khaplang with him. In 1988, the NSCN split into NSCN (IM) and NSCN (K) after a violent clash. While the NNC began to fade away, and Phizo died in London in 1991, the NSCN (IM) came to be seen as the “mother of all insurgencies” in the region.WHAT DID THE NSCN (IM) WANT?A “Greater Nagalim” comprising “all contiguous Naga-inhabited areas”, along with Nagaland. That included several districts of Assam, Arunachal and Manipur, as also a large tract of Myanmar. The map of “Greater Nagalim” has about 1,20,000 sq km, while the state of Nagaland consists of 16,527 sq km. The claims have always kept Assam, Manipur and Arunachal Pradesh wary of a peace settlement that might affect their territories. The Nagaland Assembly has endorsed the ‘Greater Nagalim’ demand — “Integration of all Naga-inhabited contiguous areas under one administrative umbrella” — as many as five times: in December 1964, August 1970, September 1994, December 2003 and as recently as on July 27, 2015.WHEN DID NSCN (IM) JOIN PEACE TALKS?Muivah, Swu and other top NSCN (IM) leaders escaped to Thailand in the early 1990s. While Nagaland Governor M M Thomas, a Church leader from Kerala, extracted the first positive response from the NSCN(IM), Prime Minister P V Narasimha Rao met Muivah, Swu and others in Paris on June 15, 1995. In November 1995, then MoS (Home) Rajesh Pilot met them in Bangkok. Subsequently, Prime Minister H D Deve Gowda met them in Zurich on February 3, 1997, which was followed by meetings with officers in Geneva and Bangkok. Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee met them in Paris on September 30, 1998. The Government of India signed a ceasefire agreement with NSCN (IM) on July 25, 1997, which came into effect on August 1, 1997. Over 80 rounds of talks between the two sides were held subsequently.HOW DID PRIME MINISTER MODI TRAVEL THE LAST MILE?For the NSCN (IM), the Modi government continues from where Vajpayee left. The RSS’s Northeast veteran P B Acharya is currently Nagaland Governor, and Joint Intelligence Committee chairman R N Ravi, with his IB background, is an old Northeast hand. The state’s political scenario has changed, with T R Zeliang’s Naga People’s Front, an NDA ally, persuading all groups in the Assembly, including the Congress, to become partners in an all-party government.HOW HAVE MANIPUR, ASSAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH REACTED?Leaders cutting across party lines have preferred to wait and watch. Nobody in these three states would allow even an inch of their land to be added to a ‘Greater Nagalim’, if at all that term is part of the accord.WHAT ABOUT S S KHAPLANG?In March this year, he abrogated the ceasefire he had signed in 2001, and is sure to oppose the accord. Security forces have been already alerted across Nagaland, Assam, Manipur and Arunachal Pradesh.HOW ATAL WON NAGA HEARTS“Ami laga bhai aru boyni-khan. Aami Nagaland-te matiye karone besi khusi paise dei. (My dear brothers and sisters. I am very happy to be amid you on the soil of Nagaland.)”This was Atal Bihari Vajpayee, opening his speech at a public reception in Kohima on October 28, 2003. He went on to speak about the “unique history” of the Nagas — the sentence that Nagas, and especially the NSCN (IM), have always remembered.Neither Indira Gandhi nor Rajiv Gandhi ever visited Kohima as Prime Minister. A visit by Jawaharlal Nehru had witnessed an embarrassing spectacle of 5,000 Nagas turning their backs on the PM after he rejected the demand for a “sovereign” Nagaland on March 30, 1953. Morarji Desai and H D Deve Gowda travelled to Kohima, but neither of them is remembered with the fondness that the Nagas have for Vajpayee. The first NDA Prime Minister not only recognised the “unique history” of the Nagas, but also admitted that mistakes had been committed, and lamented the unnecessary spilling of blood in the state.“It is true that of all the states in India, Nagaland has a unique history. We are sensitive to this historical fact,” Vajpayee said in his speech. “But this uniqueness has in no way diminished the spirit of patriotism among the Naga people. We have the inspiring examples of patriot Jadunong, who became a martyr, and Rani Gaidinliu. Who can forget that in critical times of war in 1962, 1965 and 1971, Naga underground organisations did not fire on the Indian Army? They showed restraint. I would also like to acknowledge the sacrifices of jawans from Nagaland during the Kargil War,” he said.CHRONICLES OF CONFLICT AND (ATTEMPTED) PEACEJune 1947: Naga-Akbar Hydari AgreementSigned by The Naga National Convention and the Governor of AssamTHE AGREEMENT: “That the right of the Nagas to develop themselves according to their freely expressed wishes is recognized.”THE CATCH: “The Governor of Assam as the Agent of the Government of the Indian Union will have a special responsibility for a period of 10 years to ensure the observance of the agreement, at the end of this period the Naga Council will be asked whether they require the above agreement to be extended for a further period or a new agreement regarding the future of Naga people arrived at.”July 1960: Sixteen-point Agreement with the Naga People’s ConventionNagaland formed as a state, under the charge of the Ministry of External AffairsTHE AGREEMENT: “No Act or law passed by the Union Parliament affecting the following provisions shall have legal force in the Nagaland unless specially applied to it by a majority vote of the Nagaland Legislative Assembly:(a) The Religious or Social Practices of the Nagas,(b) The Customary Laws and Procedure,(c) Civil and Criminal Justice so far as these concern decision according to the Naga Customary Law.”THE CATCH: “The Naga leaders expressed the view that other Nagas inhabiting contiguous areas should be enabled to join the new state. It was pointed out to them on behalf of the Government of India that Article 3 and 4 of the Constitution provided for increasing the area of any state, but it was not possible for the Government of India to make any commitment in this regard at this stage”.1964: Ceasefire AgreementTHE AGREEMENT: “The Government of India welcomes the steps intended to bring about peace in Nagaland and with this object in view… they will depute representatives, with whom will be associated the representatives of the Government of Nagaland, to take part in talks with leaders of the underground. To facilitate these talks and taking note of the letter of August 10, 1964… it has been ordered that with effect from September 6, 1964, and for a period thereafter of one month at present, the security forces will not undertake: a. jungle operations; b. raiding of camps of the underground; c. patrolling beyond one thousand yards of Security posts; d. searching of villages; e. aerial action; f. arrests; and g. imposition of labour by way of punishment.THE CATCH: “Operations will be suspended as above on the understanding that the underground have accepted that during this period they will refrain from: (i) sniping and ambushing; (ii) imposition of fines; (iii) kidnapping and recruiting; (iv) sabotage activities; (v) raiding and firing on Security posts, towns and administrative centres; and (vi) moving with arms or in uniform in towns, villages and administrative centres, wherever there are Security posts and approaching within one thousand yards of Security posts.”1975: Shillong AgreementBetween Nagaland Governor L P Singh and underground leadersTHE AGREEMENT: “The representatives of the underground organisations conveyed their decision, of their own volition, to accept, without condition, the Constitution of India. It was agreed that the arms, now underground, would be brought out and deposited at appointed places. Details for giving effect of this agreement will be worked out between them and representatives of the Government, the security forces, and members of the Liaison Committee.”THE CATCH: “It was agreed that the representatives of the underground organisations should have reasonable time to formulate other issues for discussion for final settlement.”Copyright © 2018 The Indian Express [P] Ltd. All Rights Reserved