Rehoming Dogs Template: Fill & Download for Free

i’m assuming you’re either a breeder, rehoming your pets, or fostering puppies. you could put so many things in the goodie bags, i’m sure any expecting puppy parent would appreciate anything you gave them. i have a few ideas for you, based on my experience with adopting my chinchilla and just from speaking to puppy breeders near me.first, you might want to give them a week supply of the food your puppies are used to eating. this is for transitioning the puppy from the food its used to eating to the food its new owners are providing it.second, you want to give them a few objects that smell like the puppy’s mom, such as a towel, blanket or duvet she’s slept on. also, if the puppy has a favorite toy, put it in the goodie bag. you can always buy a new one and i’m sure the puppy would love having their toy with them.third, i think a puppy certificate would be a cute idea. i saw many chinchilla and dog breeders who did this. you can find free doggy certificates templates to print out online or get a offical pedigree certificate of the puppy’s heritage. on the homemade certificate you can put their birthdate, their birth weight, their paw print stamped on the certificate with puppy-safe ink, etc. i think it’s a super cute idea and lots of pet parents cherish their dog’s ‘birth certificate.’fourth, identification of the dog if the puppy is microchipped. some breeders microchip their puppies in advance or in this case if you are fostering / rehoming your puppies, they are probably microchipped. give the new owners the information they need in that department. also, healthscreening and dna test information should be given to the owners as well. a handwritten or typed out list of all the puppy’s medical / vet visits should be given, as well as all the vaccines the puppy has had, the boosters still left that the puppy needs in the near future, the deworming product used and the dates it’s been given and what is left to do to finish the course, and any other medical related information such as allergies and if they’ve been neutered / spayed. a document on the puppy’s daily routine and feeding instructions is also useful.fifth, a scrapbook of photo’s of the puppy at birth and throughout its life at your home is a wonderful idea. my chinchilla’s breeder made me a scrapbook of my chinchilla, including pictures of him at birth, pictures of him with his mom, pictures of him with his sister, a picture of just his mom and sister, holiday themed pictures (i got him a few weeks after christmas), etc. i absolutely adore the gift and it is so precious to me.sixth, a handwritten and personal letter wishing the best to the new family is always super sweet and touching and new dog owners, especially those who are new to being dog parents will greatly appreciate it.now onto the actual goodie bag, like i said you can honestly put anything in there and i’m sure they would love it. depending on how much your dog costs, you might want to add more expensive items to your goodie bag / box. you could put:a rubber toya tug-of-war toya teething / chew toya plush toypuppy blanketssmall throw pillowshealthy dog treatsdental care chewsfrisbeea few potty-training padsa personalized or non-personalized food and water bowlpuppy-safe carpet cleanera cute collar / leashnail clippersflea combspuppy toothbrush and toothpastea book or dvd on helping new puppies adjust, puppy care, dog health, basic dog training, how to puppy-proof your house, potty-training, crate-training, etc. if you sell working line dogs, a book about the dog's particular job could be a nice toucha premade or homemade puppy first aid kit including bandaging materials, antiseptic wash or wipes, eye and ear wash materials, scissors, tweezers, styptic sticks, diphenhydramine for allergic reactions, puppy-safe pain medicine, cold and heat packs, tick removal tool, cotton balls, cotton swabs, disposable gloves, oral syringe or turkey baster, artificial tear gel, canine first aid manual, antibiotic spray / ointment, etcleaflets, business cards and samples. samples from dog food manufacturers, pet insurance companies, smaller-scale dog professionals (groomers, trainers, doggy daycare), online stores, etc. message companies, industries and stores and let them know you are a breeder of responsibly bred, quality dogs and ask them for some promotional packs you can add to your puppy packs / bags. they will usually offer free bags of food, coupons, discounts, codes, and samples for promoting themwaste pickup bagsdog bone or puppy paw stickerscheap but cute dog decor for their housea diy cement paw of the puppy (do you know what i’m talking about? my grandma did one for her dogs when they were puppies, very cute)that’s all i can think of, hope it helps!of course, you do not need to give them every single item on that list, that is the new owners job to purchase the basics. but a few of those items is kind of you and would be great for your puppy pack / goodie bag.

I don’t think there is a single example of a National Socialist politician of the day who admitted to knowing anything about a ‘genocide’. Goering’s denials are probably the best known, as he was put on trial in Nuernberg and was the most vocal of the defendants. There was actually no official plan for ‘genocide’, so there would be no need for ‘Hitler’ to convince anyone for it. The official plan for for ‘emigration’. So the argument amongst the leadership would be about ‘emigration’ solving the ‘jewish question’. Perhaps discrete encouragement to emigrate would be enough or perhaps more overt action like acquiring the island of Madagascar might be needed so as to give the emigrating jews a new home. This would be the nature of the discussions. We need to keep in mind that right up until the late stages of the war Jews loaded onto trains would be given an ‘emigration pack’ which includes things like a spade and seeds — all the things they would need for their new life in the ‘east’. They were officially ‘evacuated’ to the ‘east’. Pretty clearly, most of the people administering this ‘evacuation’ genuinely believed the official line.What happened then is easier to understand if we put it into a more modern context. We are right now quite regularly subjected to political rhetoric about the ‘total annihilation’ of what is called the ‘Islamic state’ in Syria and Iraq. A lot of young western people have found it attractive to go to Syria and Iraq to defend the ‘Islamic world’ from American (and British) crusader-like aggression. Just like a century ago, a lot of British young people thought it was a good idea to go to Spain to defend the Spanish from ‘fascist aggression’ (the author George Orwell being one of the people who answered the call for the defence of ‘democracy’). In our time, quite a few of European young people have gone to Iraq and Syria. Quite a lot of those people have been female and of school going age. What has been the response of the British state? The official position of the British government is that these children ‘stabbed us in the back’, that they should therefore have their citizenship ‘revoked’ and that they should be classified as ‘terrorists’. No formal charges are needed, no conviction in a court of law is necessary. They are just labeled as ‘terrorists’. In other words, the British government is creating a licence to murder its own citizens. They are also doing things like ‘freezing’ their bank accounts and seizing their assets. In other words, stealing their property. Leaving them stateless and impoverished. What happens to these people? Well, the British government uses its ‘foreign aid’ money to generously fund concentration camps in the deserts of Syria where these people live in atrocious conditions. So atrocious that lots of them die, especially children.There is the well known case of Shamima Begum (Shamima Begum), a British schoolgirl with 3 children forced to live in the concentration camps of Syria. She is a British citizen, whose children are also British. She has never been convicted of any crime, indeed has never been charged with anything criminal. She has never had the chance to defend her self in court or to anyone making the decisions about her. A British court has decided in effect that what has been done to her is illegal. Yet she is still deemed a ‘security risk’ and not allowed to go home. Conditions in the concentration camps are so bad that all 3 children died. The British government knew that they would die and did nothing to save them, which they could easily have done by just sending a plane to rescue them.The most appalling thing about this instance of outrageous and shameful act of British administrative villainy is that pretty much everyone knows about it but just shrugs their shoulders and pretends its not happening, saying to themselves ‘I’m glad its not me’. As far as I know, no one has lodged a complaint at the Hague for crimes against humanity. Most people would not even think of doing this because they would much rather not be associated with ‘terrorists’. And that is exactly how people in the 1930s felt about ‘jews’. Jews were ‘communists’, ‘anarchists’ and ‘terrorists’. Something had to be done about them. This was common not only in Germany by also in France, Britain and America. There was no ‘Hitler’ needed to convince anyone that there needed to be a ‘solution’ to the ‘jewish problem’. Politicians at the time were inundated with requests and demands that something be done about the terrible ‘jewish threat’. No politician at the time would survive if they were seen as sympathetic to (or ‘soft’ on) ‘jews’ (just like it was dangerous in 1950s America to be seen to be ‘soft’ on communists). Even now anyone who is seen as sympathetic to ‘terrorists’ is liable to be persecuted by the state. The sad fact is that there is no evil villain at the head of government who manages to convince everyone else to carry out their diabolical plans. Even if we managed to have Boris Johnson arrested and dragged off to the Hague, the Syrian concentration camps would not be closed and Shamima Begum would not be welcomed back to her British home.The most idiotic thing about ‘islamic terror’ is that it is almost entirely a fiction created by American intelligence to fight a ‘war’ against communism. People would arrive in the deserts of Arabia expecting to fight the enemies of ‘islam’ but in reality all they would find there was just a few camel herders. The ‘jihad’ was a fiction designed and manufactured in Washington. Finding nothing, they actually created ‘Islamic state’ from the ideology provided for them from the efforts to engineer war in the middle east. The whole history of this is explained in an excellent BBC documentary called The Power of Nightmares (The Power of Nightmares). It was unavailable for many years, but can now be found on YouTube:In the case of Shamima Begum we can very clearly point to 3 dead children in concentration camps paid for and in-part managed by the British state. It is to a certain degree a cause celebre, and so we can with certainty say that it was the British state and establishment which intentionally murdered the three children. The case was publicised while the children were still alive and it was known that the children would die if nothing was done. Nothing was done and they did in fact die, all three of them, one by one. There was no outrage, there were no public demonstrations. Quite the opposite. There was the hope that now that the children were dead then the publicity would die away, along with the mother. In fact, the murder of other well known (more ‘native’) ‘terrorists’ would actually bring people out to dance in the streets. The case of Shamima Begum is not an isolated case. There are thousands like her, languishing in concentration camps in Iraq and Syria. These are people from Europe and other western countries. People from the middle east or other third world countries are generally just killed outright (again, something that is well documented and generally not remarked on). It is quite clear therefore that this is a ‘genocide’, not of a specific race but of people of a specific political affiliation.So who exactly is responsible for this ‘genocide’? Is there some evil mad-man who is twirling his moustache while convincing his innocent British underlings to carry out his evil plans? Sadly there is not. There isn’t now and there wasn’t in 1933. Working out who is responsible for the deaths of British children in the concentration camps of Syria is a good exercise in finding out why people died in German concentration camps.I should probably add the disclaimer that I am expressly not equating ‘ISIS terrorists’ with the Jewish people killed during the National Socialist period in Germany. It is our government which is doing that, not in the distant past but right now. Just because you insult someone and call them an ‘ISIS terrorist’ doesn’t mean that you can strip someone of their citizenship and throw them and their children into a concentration camp, where you know that they are likely to die due to the terrible conditions there. Just because the gutter media insults someone, just underlines the point. For anyone who reads headlines in the Daily Mail or the Express about an ‘a Islamic State theocracy built on blood and terror’ you have to keep in mind that these are exactly the same kind of base perverse insults with no basis in fact or law that were stock in trade with the nationalist media in Germany during the NS period. The headlines found in the populist newspapers (mostly the foreign owned ones) in the UK are almost word-for-word identical to the headlines you would find day after day in the National Socialist media; just replace the word ‘Jew’ with ‘ISIS’. People like Goebbels’s literally wrote the playbook on how to insult people. What makes these headlines so pernicious is that they have the full support of the government, and that they are repeated day after day until people actually believe it. People actually believed that ‘jews’ were responsible for all kinds of terrible ‘crimes’ after reading a decade of vile insults in the media headlines. It was mostly just pure invention. Just because you insult someone in the populist media doesn’t make it true. Just about everything people say about ISIS is just that, crude insult from the popular media which is almost pure invention and has no basis in fact whatsoever. What we should take particular note of is that the government shows no interest in prosecuting any of these people who are described by the populist media as having a ‘blood thirst’ that would put a vampire to shame, even though they are our own citizens and are entitled to a fair trial if they are accused of a crime. The point is that there is actually not even any interest in drawing up formal charges against them, never mind allowing them a fair trial.As a further edit:It is absolutely astonishing what various people are saying in the comments. Not only do people wish to deny that our own citizens are being arbitrarily stripped of their citizenship and then systematically murdered but practically in the same sentence they want to explain why this is both important and necessary. This is despite the fact that I have made it abundantly clear that the supposedly ‘totally terrible and evil international terrorist organization’ that these people supposed joined is a just a crude fiction. All you have to do is watch the authoritative BBC documentary that I helpfully provide a link to. You literally can watch it right from the same screen that you are reading this answer on. For those who don’t have the attention span to watch a 3 hour documentary, perhaps it might be useful to give a short tutorial about the use of the word ‘terrorism’.This is what a ‘terrorist’ looks like:Convicted in a court of law of crimes associated with a state sponsored terror campaign in America’s ‘backyard’.This is a picture of another ‘terrorist’:No, not the (Kenyan) man in the center of the picture (whose middle name is Hussein), but rather the very white looking European man on the right and left of the 44′th President of the United States. Detained by the British as a ‘terrorist’ suspect, arrested by the British on ‘terror’ charges, found guilty and imprisoned by the British for 6 months. Admitted to being a member of the IRA. Funded by Irish Americans. Welcomed into the White House for a photo-op with the President.This is a picture of genuine ‘terrorists’ from Afghanistan:Another photo-opportunity for ‘terrorists’ in the White House with the President of the United States. The President had this to say about them “They are the moral equal of our Founding Fathers and the brave men and women of the French Resistance.” Pretty high praise for a gang of criminals who would go on (after the war) to destroy their country fighting each other and then (after the American money had run out) they would turn on their former benefactor and destroy the WTC in 9/11 (and also partially destroy the Pentagon). Some of these guys are still around today, although not welcomed to the White House for tea parties any more.This is a picture of a well known fictional character:It has been alleged (but never proven) that this person is the leader of a terrible and evil terrorist cult called the ‘jedi knights’. He has been stripped of his imperial citizenship and if found will be put into a concentration camp where he will be slowly starved to death. He is in hiding on a remote desert planet from where he sends out cryptic messages to his followers, who may be carrying out suicide bombings on his behalf. In his previous career he was lavishly funded by the Republic to fight the ‘dark side’. Where he did exactly the same job — sitting in a big chair sending out cryptic messages to his followers, who sometimes carry out suicide bombings. Killed mysteriously during a raid on the Death Star and never seen again (except in spirit).This is a real person but dressed up playing a very similar looking fictional character:It has been alleged (but never proven) that this person is the leader of a terrible and evil terrorist cult called the ‘al-qaeda’ (which means something similar to ‘jedi knight’ in Langleyese arabic). He has been stripped of his ‘royal’ citizenship and if found will be put into a concentration camp where he will be slowly starved to death. He is in hiding on a remote desert country from where he sends out cryptic messages to his followers, who may be carrying out suicide bombings on his behalf. In his previous career he was lavishly funded by the American Republic to fight ‘communism’. Where he did exactly the same job — sitting in a big chair sending out cryptic messages to his followers. Killed mysteriously during a raid from the Death Star and never seen again (except in spirit) … I mean, killed in a raid by elite stormtroopers and taken to a giant nuclear power aircraft carrier from which he is secretly dumped into the ocean, never to be seen again (except constantly on our TV screens).Here he is building roads on a remote desert planet allied to the Republic … I mean a remote desert country funded by the American Republic and their clients state, the Saudis. Again, dressed up as Obi-Wan Kenobi for the cameras.You can read the text of the story here:Anti-Soviet warrior puts his army on the road to peace | The IndependentThis is his replacement when the original Obi-Wan outlived his usefulness:They are using exactly the same playbook, so I don’t need to repeat the exact same text again (and it is indeed exactly the same): the only difference is that this time the mysterious and evil ‘terror organization’ is now called ‘ISIS’ or ‘Islamic State’. Unfortunately the actors are 2nd rate this time (as they usually are in sequels), not quite up to the job. You can see in this picture that underneath his Obi-Wan garb he is wearing an expensive modern western wrist watch. Everyone was greatly disappointed by this pantomime style error. As a result he was never seen in public again. No dramatic Death Star style ending for his story line.I hope you can see from this little montage what real genuine ‘terrorists’ look like. We don’t strip them of their citizenship and throw them into a concentration camp where they will die a horrible death. We usually call them ‘freedom fighters’. Even if they are fighting in the north of Ireland and are blowing up entire city blocks in London. Another very obvious indicator is the clothing they wear. Real ‘terrorists’ don’t wear some kind of weird fantasy medieval monk type of garb. We see that only in Hollywood movies. People in the middle east just don’t wear that type of clothing. Even that gang of criminals who visited the White House from Afghanistan wear fairly normal looking clothes. Its pretty obvious that whosoever is responsible for ‘al-qaeda’ and ‘ISIS’ in Langley, Virginia is a fan of Star Wars. Maybe its a subtle message that people are so stupid they won’t notice, or they thought that Star Wars was some kind of instruction manual on how a ‘terrorist leader’/holy warrior freedom fighter should look. Either way, its obvious that its a work of fiction. You can go to the middle east and just ask people. They will all tell you the same thing. People just don’t dress like that, they don’t act like that, and they don’t look like that. Also, the ‘religious’ mumbo jumbo is all wrong. Real muslims from the middle east think its pretty weird and ‘foreign’. They don’t get it. They also don’t get Star Wars. What the people in Langley didn’t account for with their little inside joke is that lots of people in the ‘West’ love Star Wars, and almost treat it like a real religion. So if the people in Langley put out the message that Obi-Wan Kenobi is living in the deserts of Syria its going to be very attractive to them.This has led to what is essentially a ‘crusade’ of what are essentially children and young adults going to the deserts of Arabia to play out fantasies of fighting the dark forces of an ‘evil empire’. To pretend that these people are some kind of great menace or pose any real danger to anyone (except to themselves) is just sheer idiocy. Even Adolph Hitler himself would not stoop so low as to pretend that some misguided teenage children could be considered any kind of genuine danger. At least there were (and still are) genuine ‘international financiers’ and they do indeed pose a genuine danger. They look like this guy:Nasty, sleazy, slimy and almost always as fat as Jabba the Hut. This guy specializes in stealing people’s pensions and bribing government to legitimize his theft (by agreeing to give a bit of it back). He and others of his ilk genuinely deserve to be thrown into a concentration camp and made to do at least a few days of real labour. Some of them happen to be Jewish. Its easy to see the temptation to conclude that they must form an ‘international Jewish conspiracy’. Especially if you have to explain it to simple uneducated people. You can understand how talking about talking about one thing can mistakenly lead to the other. That is how this guy got into trouble:A man so pure of heart that he is about as close to being as a real life Obi-Wan Kenobi as its possible to get. Yet he was brought down by the Jabba the Hut style financiers who constantly pushed lurid stories in the media (which they mostly own) about him being an ‘anti-semite’. If anyone was ever an exemplar of not being an anti-semite it was probably him. That shows you just how bad (and vile) the British gutter press is. Its absolutely despicable, and in this case they are just doing it for light entertainment. In the case of ‘al-qaeda’ and ‘ISIS’ they are doing for real, and with tragic consequences. One of those consequences is that ordinary well educated intelligent people genuinely believe that their own fellow citizens should ‘rot in hell’.Lets look at what the steps on the path to ‘hell’ looks like.You start with a simple seemingly innocuous statement like the following:If the international semites of Islamic State should succeed in plunging us once more into a war in the middle east, the result will be not be … the victory of the Caliphate , but the utter global annihilation of al-qaeda as a whole.Politicians are right now literally making statement just like the above. As I outlined above, they have already begun stripping people of their citizenship and forcing them into concentration camps. Where lots of them are dying. This primes the pump for a self-fulfilling ‘prophecy’. Putting people into concentration camps and murdering them makes a lot of people angry. If you start rounding up and murder semitic people, then this makes other semitic people get angry.At first its just a few unfortunate individuals who for example travel to Syria or Iraq. But they have brothers and sisters, parents and relatives. Naturally they want to rescue their kin. But you are ready for them. As soon as they cross the border you kidnap them and put them into the concentration camps as well. You take care to produce daily statistics about the ‘terror threat’. The numbers are rising! Day on day, week on week! You make sure that there are daily front page headlines about the ‘rising threat’. What would the tens of thousands of these people do if they were released and returned home? This would not be a lie. A whole generation of young people are being ‘radicalized’ in these camps. Then you wait patiently until some unfortunate individual who has seen enough of his relatives murdered in the camps decides to explode a bomb in a shopping center or train station. You quietly prepare for this inevitable event. You make sure there will be wall-to-wall media coverage. You ask journalists to prepare templates for the stories. You the press releases are pre-drafted.Maybe when the first bombing happens you let it pass. People are angry and demand action but you say no, we need to remain calm, preserve the peace. With the second bombing you again caution restraint. But you give a stern warning, if there are more bombings there will be ‘consequences’. You prepare the bureaucratic machinery for those ‘consequences’. You make sure the media hammers home the daily message that there is an ‘international’ conspiracy behind the bombings. If ‘ISIS’ dares to bomb us one more time there will be dire ‘consequences’. If there don’t happen to be any bombings you make sure your intelligence agencies work overtime to make sure there are some (at the right place and at the right time). All they have to do is give a bit of funding, material and encouragement to the right people. Jails have plenty of the right kind of people. Or you can bring home a few of the angriest people from the camps.Then, when the public mood is right and the next ‘outrage’ happens then you announce the next phase. Everyone agrees that those in the camps are the worst of the worst. They chose to travel to Syria and to join an evil terror organization. No doubt about it. They ‘made their bed and now they have to lie in it’. Everyone will agree. 100%. Now we start talking about where these terrible people might have gotten their ideas from. Obviously it must be the parents and relatives. We have the evidence for that … a terrible bombing campaign. Lots of people killed, maimed and so forth. What can we do? Well, you have prepared a very obvious solution. The children have been ‘radicalized’. It must have been a few ‘bad eggs’ who did the radicalizing. We shall test them to see if they are one of these terrible ‘radicalizers’. Of course the test is just bogus nonsense, as is the very idea of ‘radicalization’. But once people have accepted the idea of ‘radicalization’ it makes sense to test for those who are doing the radicalization. No one notices the vital step of moving from putting those who voluntarily crossed the ‘border’ and ‘made their own bed’ to taking people who did nothing at all. You make sure that you keep the contents of the ‘test’ a state secret so that no one can see that it is bogus. The decision about who is a ‘radicalizer’ actually depends on the targets and quotas for the number of people who you want to detain, not whether they pose any actual genuine danger. At first you start with people who are genuinely bad and you publicise how many lives you have ‘saved’ by sending these ‘bad’ people to the camps. You make sure the dossiers of the worst are daily front page headlines. People will think what a great job the police are doing by putting these terrible people away to some place where they can never harm ordinary decent people ever again. People now feel safe when the daily quota for ‘bad’ people has been met. But soon enough you run out of genuinely ‘bad’ people, and then people will start to complain. The daily numbers are in decline, people are starting to feel ‘unsafe’ — something must be done! So you start lowering the threshold for ‘bad’, bit by bit. No one notices that you are now sending quite ordinary people away into the camps. And in no time at all, you’ve got every single ‘international semite’ in the whole country. They are ‘international’ because you strip them of their citizenship as soon as they are sent to the camps. They can ‘appeal’ from the camps but you make sure this leads nowhere. It will only succeed if a non-semite has been mistakenly sent to the camps, and then only if that non-semite is not an ‘undesirable’. Gypsies are not very desirable, ‘communists’ are not very desirable. Benefit claiming single mothers are not very desirable. In fact there is no shortage of people who you can classify as just as undesirable as those ‘international semites’.In the camps you make sure that conditions are so poor that plenty of people die naturally by starvation, disease and crime. You make sure the crime aspect get lots of coverage in the media. This will convince everyone that it was absolutely right to send these terrible people to the camps. You also make sure that everyone gets a chance to express their ‘opinion’ on social media. You encourage people to participate in weekly ‘hate’ sessions. You make sure your intelligence agencies keep a record of these ‘opinions’. You encourage statements like ‘I hope they rot in hell’. You can even censure people for going too far. You show restraint, but you make sure the most extreme views get lots of media coverage. After all these camps are officially called ‘deradicalization and rehabilitation’ camps. You make sure there is plenty of ‘dirt’ on people that might be influential in the future.Then you start telling people the terrible truth. You would intimate that if these people in the camps were ever released there would be a terrible vengeance, a reckoning. You make sure everyone understand there is a record of all the ‘hate’ on social media. There would be a terrible judgement on those who participated. But you are on their side. You will make sure this never happens. You ask them to leave the ‘international semite’ problem in your hands. The solution will be tough, it will be difficult, but if everyone works together we will manage. And now you can do whatever you want and no one will say a single word. Indeed anyone who dares to say anything untoward will be denounced as an ‘enemy of the people’ and sent straight to the camps themselves. Again, no one will say a word against it.This is not just a story. It has happened before in the past, and it will undoubtedly happen again. Its happening right now. Its happening in China with the muslim turkish minority, and its happening right here in our midst with kids of middle eastern heritage who just happen to travel to Iraq or Syria (which they are perfectly entitled to do). Stripping citizenship has so far only happened in a few cases, but nevertheless even those not stripped of their citizenship languish in the camps and are not allowed to go home (for various spurious reasons).And this brings us to who is responsible. Is it that terrible ‘dictator’ whose ‘prophecy’ made it all happen. Is it some terrible group of people who have the power to control people’s minds and infect them with terrible ideas? No dear reader … the responsibility lies with you! The little old lady who never says anything bad to anyone but who thinks to herself ‘I hope she rots in hell’. That is where it all starts. Just that tiny bit of prejudice, that little bit of ‘anti-semetism’. Compound that millions of times and you arrive at Auschwitz. The politician is actually just doing what that kind little old lady wants and the newspapers just tells her what she wants to read. That kind little old lady, who volunteers at the animal shelter and who posts on facebook on rehoming abandoned dogs, who subscribes to schemes to feed the starving children in Africa, who volunteers to allow disadvantaged children play sports. That is where the most evil of ideas have their origin. The responsibility lies with you. What can be done about this? I will leave that as a task for you to think about.