Affidavit Of Legitimation: Fill & Download for Free

Many of the other answers have copied from Pakistani DG Passport website which has outdated and misleading information.There is no tourist visa scheme active between India and Pakistan. It is on papers but has yet to see the day of light. Other than business or pilgrimage you can only visit to see a friend or relative. Based on your case, you will need to have a host in Pakistan who must provide sponsorship documents that will go along with your visa application.These documents are:ID Card Copy of HostAffidavit of sponsorshipRecent Utility Bill CopyEvidence citing visit reasonsIf all goes well at Pakistan High Commission (PHC), Delhi, you will be given a 30 days visit visa with 90 days of validity to start your travel. Most first time visitors without strong relationship with Host are put in to Inquiry process. In this process, PHC will initiate procedures within Pakistan where officials will visit your Host in Pakistan and ask them to do some formalities to confirm that they are your legitimate hosts. After you host have completed those formalities (which requires filling and submitting various documents), you are eligible to reappear to PHC, Delhi and get your visa stamped.

An American who somehow ‘helps’ someone else obtain a US visa has no actual obligation to or for the traveler unless there is an official affidavit of support involved. Even if the American should complete and submit an I-134 on the applicants’ behalf, the consular officer is not obliged to accept it since there is no way to enforce it absent protracted and probably fruitless work in the US by ICE.As for any lesser indications of support, such as letters or personal pleas, those are not legally binding and consular officers should never accept them in lieu of the visa applicant’s convincing ability to support him/herself, and a strong and legitimate reason to travel to the US and then go home promptly.

I support making abortions illegal, UNDER THESE CONDITIONS:If all women are to be considered as criminals for having abortions then let us make it so for all abortions.All pregnancy that does not produce viable issue, regardless of cause, should result in criminal investigation.Women should have their menstrual flow analyzed each month for proof of legitimate menstruation. This shall commence upon menarche. Women may only be exempted from this by producing evidence of pregnancy or sterility.Spontaneous abortions (euphemistically called "miscarriage") should be considered suspect and criminally investigated.Stillbirths should be similarly considered suspect and criminally investigated.Ectopic pregnancies are still pregnancies, and must be carried to term.*Molar pregnancies are still pregnancies, and must be carried to term.*"Therapeutic abortion" postpartum for "products of conception" is still an abortion, and should be considered criminal abortion.IUDs, by preventing implantation, are considered abortifacients by some, so they should also be criminalized.Hormonal birth control is considered abortifacient by some, and so these should likewise be criminalized. This includes allegedly "therapeutic" use.The morning after pill is also criminalized.NO EXCEPTIONSIn recognition of the part of men in conception,All men should be sterilized at puberty. Current medical technology allows for reversible sperm inhibition (Vasalgel); reversal of the process should only take place with the notarized and consenting presence of a female partner.All men should have their ejaculate tested for presence of sperm on a regular basis. Presence of sperm without a conception and pregnancy agreement with a partner should be criminalized.All men must post a bond against the possible costs of childrearing.All infants should have DNA tested against possible paternity. Those whose parentage cannot be verified will be allotted funds from the general pool of male childrearing bonds.All vaginal/uterine issue should be examined, and anything determined to contain DNA evidence of paternity shall result in the criminal prosecution of the involved male, as an accessory to abortion.In order to remedy the horrors of unadopted children, all adoptions will take place on a first come, first-served basis, without regard for age, or any other matching criterion.All IVF requires an affidavit of guaranteed implantation, whether into the egg producer or surrogate.Any implements that might conceivably be used for artificially inducing abortion should be regulated as a potential murder weapon. This includes vacuum sealers, knitting needles, and hangers.All implements potentially used for surgical abortion procedures must be sealed under lock and only unsealed by specific judicial decree.The only female surgical sterilization available should be complete oophorectomy and hysterectomy.* miracles happen; all pregnancies are blessings, if you weren't willing to die for the child, you should not have allowed yourself to be impregnated.The only point I am not clear on is whether the pregnancy related death of a woman should be charged as murder against the impregnating male.In the interest of space, I have not gone into the ramifications of the precept that any action that might harm the fetus should be charged as abuse, nor into the concept that maternal support being of utmost importance to the developing child, all mothers should be supported by the state.Just a modest proposal. Doesn't even go as far as Enver Hoxha's attempt to keep all Albanian women constantly pregnant.[ADDENDUM April 2015 — I'm really saddened that my attempt at hyperbolic suggestion has been made all too real in Indiana this year, with the imprisonment of Purvi Patel.]