Medication Reconciliation Form Template: Fill & Download for Free

Technological innovation has a transformative effect on the way we live and work as we are living in a digital generation. Gradually and consistently, Technological innovation has been making progress in revolutionizing techniques for learning and educating. Technological Innovation empowered educational curriculum and smart boards have successfully replaced traditional slates and 2-D textbooks.Schooling is one of the basic components adding to the upliftment of society. Education is tied in with bestowing knowledge and the advancement of society in different fields and areas. Yet, because of the progressing COVID-19 pandemic, schools, universities, and other educational foundations are compelled to be shut. However, the coming of technological innovation brings tutors and understudies nearer, assisting them with learning their homes. Their homes have been changed over into study halls, PC and cell phone screens into blackboards. Learning from home is an alternative at this point.Modern technological advancements like AR (Augmented Reality) and VR (Virtual Reality) are turning into the hottest subjects in changing environments. However, what precisely are AR and VR? Let us study.The gap which bridges the digital and physical world is AR (Augmented Reality) & VR(Virtual Reality). They permit you to learn and content visually, similarly you take on this planet. Augmented reality drastically extends the manners in which our devices can assist with regular activities like looking for data, shopping, and communicating. Virtual Reality lets you experience what it resembles to go anywhere — from the first row to last in outer space.Augmented reality (AR) adds digital components to a live view frequently by utilizing the camera on a cell phone. Instances of Augmented reality encounters incorporate Snapchat and the game Pokemon Go.Virtual reality (VR) suggests a total inundation experience that closes out the actual world. Utilizing VR devices, for example, Google Cardboard, Oculus Rift, or HTC Vive, clients can be shipped into various real-world and envisioned environment, for example, the center of a squawking penguin province or even the back of a dragon.Anatomy of AR & VR in Education SystemIn the education system Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality stands on the four pillars that are: Faster, Bester, Harder, and StrongerMuch the same as any sector, the education framework needs the most recent technological innovation developments to remain relevant in the consistently changing world and to remain on the course of its remarkable mission. Virtual Reality app development services and augmented reality app development services are the next breakthrough in the development of the Education System. From a business perspective, AR and VR executed in education applies to various business models, which is consistently an incredible selling point.There is no compelling reason to sort out sustainable models of business that can harvest benefit in the present moment as schooling is a public service and has more guidelines. Since sorting out the plans of action is a significant problem area with AR and VR, however, it very well may be viewed as later on.Making educational or learning content is longer and is a vast process that requires tight coordinated effort and adaptability when managing understudies, particularly with kids. The content made should be proper and pertinent. top ar app development services or application should have the option to catch the fine working of the content and make a convincing visualAt the point when AR/VR technological innovation meets education, the effect it makes is immense. In any case, the fundamental test in building up a custom AR/VR learning application is that the majority of the components must be worked without any preparation. Notwithstanding, building applications that enable teachers to develop AR/VR applications for instructive purposes from building blocks, utilizing available tool compartments and templates is conceivable.By making an intuitive and drawing in learning experience without course readings or boards, AR and VR engage understudies to explore information and learn at their solace, consequently animating learning and perception, improving critical retention. Applications made by the best ar app development company, which are intended for educational purposes, consolidates digital technologies, improving the learning cycle, and permit understudies to gain data outwardly, giving a strong base to improve the schooling cycle. For instance, a student can find out about a rainforest by taking an expedition through a digital forest utilizing an application, simple cardboard VR glasses, and headphones. Without having step out of their homes, particularly because of the COVID-19 pandemic and the forced lockdown, students can encounter new and dynamic learning ways. Instructors could train different science subjects through virtual labs, keeping the students drew in, yet additionally permitting them to rehearse before they can test the investigations in genuine research facilities. Students of medication can contemplate the exactness of life systems, get familiar with the compelling artwork of medical anatomy, and recreate circumstances where they could rehearse virtually.AR and VR can be a surprisingly positive development for students who have different inabilities. AR/VR solutions can assist understudies with different weaknesses by controlling the differentiation, text sizes, add sound discourse, adding to the reconciliation of the understudies with inabilities into the community.Here is a portion of the vital advantages of utilizing AR and VR technological innovation in education and learning.Encourages student learning through gamification and intelligenceKeeps students connected even while learning troublesome pointsImproves innovative thinkingFewer interruptionsEncourages collaborationsCan be utilized for practical trainingExtended training prospects with the 3D plan, modeling, and ppts.AR and VR Technology ChallengesA portion of the normal challenges of utilizing augmented reality technology is that there’s a battle to utilize the new technology advances by teachers. Also, not all understudies have the cell phones fit for supporting AR content. Virtual Reality, then again, faces various challenges. Significant expenses of equipment, openness, and absence of value content are a portion of the imperatives that have kept VR from being the advancement of innovation in education.As indicated by a report by Goldman Sachs, in 2020 the total revenue generated for AR & VR learning educational software would be around $300 million and this figure is required to develop to $700 million by 2025. As investment keep on rising, the nature of content improves and the expense of equipment diminishes, the innovation is currently open to educational organizations around the world. The AR/VR innovation has the capability of being the greatest achievement in the education and learning framework in the 21st century.Both AR and VR innovations contribute different energizing open doors for training framework which can be key in unravelling the key difficulties and bringing another change. With this quick developing universe of innovation, the current instructive framework must receive these creative advancements to remain on the ball.After having a deep study about AR & VR in the education industry you must be thinking about how to get it done. You don’t need to worry about it ,CDN solution group, the top ar app development company is ready to help you in any manner you want. We provide all sorts of solutions related to software development and other IT business needs. We are having bunch of excellent developers and designers. Let’s connect.

It’s not just among Conservatives or Republicans (not necessarily synonymous) and the phrasing of your question only serves to further divide us on a major problem facing our Country (Edit - The question was changed. It was originally worded in a way that demonized Conservatives).This is problem that we must to come together on with a viable solution that a significant majority of us can support - A solution that could potentially affect every single one of us. In order for any plan that proposes such sweeping reform to be successful, it necessarily must be enacted with significant bipartisan support - Not an easy task given our current, and somewhat toxic political climate. No matter one's opinion on how good or bad the ACA (aka PPACA or Obamacare) was/is/could've been, it was doomed to failure for this reason alone - Even among Democrats there was a significant lack of support both in Congress and among the electorate and it was passed with legislative jujitsu. We all remember the “Louisiana Purchase” and other legal bribes and promises that were made just to secure enough Democrats to pass it. Then the election of Scott Brown (R) to the Senate in MA of all places being that Romneycare was the basis for Obamacare was telling. What should've been a mundane special election and slam dunk for a Democrat to replace the iconic Ted Kennedy (D) became a nationalized referendum on the ACA once someone realized that he could potentially stop its passage & he was elected. But Speaker Harry Reid had one last trick up his sleeve - Passing the House version as a Budget Reconciliation bill which meant that it only required 50 votes, but that no changes to the House bill could be made.Of course there will be unforseen issues with any such sweeping reform but, just as has been done in Canada over the years, we can go under the hood and fix/modify a plan if we all have skin in the game. They can modify their plan in Canada periodically because their system has broad based support.It’s really not simply a matter of whether the Canadian system, or the United Kingdom’s NHS, or any other country’s system is better or worse than our “system” (a term I use loosely). Every country is different. If those systems work well for those countries and if their people are happy with them, then in all of those individual cases their system is better for them.The real question should be: What system is best for our Country? Stick with me here for a couple minutes if I may humbly request. This is long but I believe the real problem at hand is completely misunderstood by many, if not most people and I believe there is a solution to this problem. A uniquely American solution that will solve the commonly cited problems and that a significant majority of us can support.The issue in the US, is that we don't actually have a “healthcare system.” We have a poorly conceived and/or coordinated patchwork of sub-systems that has evolved over time. Even among the significant portion of our population who are getting good healthcare, we all more or less know that our “system” is broken. Hopelessly broken IMHO. However most people, even those in foreign countries who mock our system, would also acknowledge that there are aspects of our healthcare that are world-class. So the first goal in any reform is that while we acknowledge that our system is broken, we also intuitively know that we don't want to throw the baby out with the bathwater and we fear, not completely unjustly, that a government run single payer payer system will do just that.As a country, we do still have as part of our deep seated culture, an inherent distrust of government. It’s part of our moral fabric. Like it or not, America is different. To Conservatives, classical Liberals, and Libertarians alike, and even to many on the Progressive Left though they may or may not admit it, the only thing worse than our current “system,” or lack thereof, is the thought of a government run healthcare system. So in lieu of a viable alternative plan that is not government run yet still solves all of the commonly cited problems, we are forced to defend the indefensible status quo. In other words, we are faced with a debate that in reality is a false dichotomy. A debate between the bad and the unknown. While not completely unknown as we do have other country’s systems to study, a significant portion of Americans don't like what they see and so we choose to stay with the bad rather than to risk the unknown.If, as a unified voice we wanted a government run Single-Payer system, we’d already have it. Yes, the overall healthcare industry has tremendous influence on our politicians, but still not as much as the electorate if we were anywhere nearly united on the issue. It wasn’t the healthcare industry that made HillaryCare a non-starter in ‘93, it was the people. There is simply no bipartisan or nationwide consensus on government run healthcare, even among many who’s best interests it would serve. It’s not, as many would want you to believe, simply because those people are just dumb and uneducated (Trump supporters). It's because as a country, we know, or at least we believe, that not only is our government incapable of administering healthcare for 330+M people effectively or efficiently, but we do not want our government intimately involved in our everyday lives, let alone controling something as important to us as our healthcare.This debate is about MORE than just healthcare. Government run healthcare would fundamentally change our country and the relationship that we have with our government. That, is the REAL impediment to implementing a solution to this problem.Not mention that one of the major complaints of our healthcare is the cost. We already spend, depending on who’s report you believe, 30% ($1T/year) more on healthcare per person than what would be expected based on our GDP and when compared to other OECD nations. There are a variety of reasons for this (Accounting for the cost of US health care: A new look at why Americans spend more) and they’re not necessarily driven in large part by what you’ve been led to believe. That report is useful in that it pre-dates the ACA. Things have gotten worse because the ACA did not contain cost controls and actually, albeit possibly an unintended consequence, actually incentivized cost increases.A fact that has seemingly been lost in this debate is that even if the current estimates for Single-Payer are correct, and the last time a government program came in at the estimated cost was…, those estimates increase our per capita cost! But, we also know imperically that the utilization of healthcare services will go up when healthcare is “free” and that the reimbursement rates used to calculate those estimates are unsustainably low. In other words, People will use more care and Hospitals and providers will go out of business. There’s a sarcastic saying in business: “We lose a little bit on every sale, but we make it up on volume.” That cannot work so those rates will necessarily have to be increased and therefore we already know the cost estimates for Single-Payer are low. Plus we’ll also lose the tax revenue that the industry currently generates and honestly I don't know whether or not that was taken into account in the estimates - I haven't had a chance to research that, yet.What also seems to be lost in this debate is that we are currently $22.5T in debt. We’re broke. We’re borrowing (or printing) $40k per second. Let that sink in for minute. And during that minute, we’ll have gone an additional $2.4 million in debt. Every minute, every day, 24/7/365. Don’t even start, both sides are to blame. We are to blame. Washington, D.C. is to blame. Is it any wonder we don’t trust Washington to take over 17% of our economy and control our healthcare? There is a very real possibility that with single payer that we replace individual bankruptcies as a result of medical bills with the collective bankruptcy of our country or at a minimum with a permanent slowdown of our economic growth. Nobody knows for sure and anyone who says they do with certainty is lying to you.What most don’t seem to realize in this hyper-partisan era is that it’s not so much us against each other as it is us against the ruling class elite of both parties. But this constant division is good for politicians and for ratings. We’re not talking to each other. We’re talking past each other. Or we’re talking to ourselves in our own echo chambers. Social media could be, and in many ways is, such an extremely powerful tool for good and allows us to communicate with people we would’ve never known in ways we could've never imagined just a few years ago, but it’s also a tool for sewing division among us depending upon how we choose to use it. Most of us, barring a couple key issues and sans the rhetoric really aren't all that far apart politically. To a large extent, we all want the same things. We may just have different ideas on how to get there.The bureaucracy to run this new healthcare system will be the size and expense of which the world has never seen. We’ll simply, in a tremendous upheaval, merely be shifting millions of people from the private sector, that is those who currently work at insurance companies and for healthcare providers, to this new government bureaucracy. Along with it will come multiple levels of government G-XX level managers and administrators and directors and deputy directors and chiefs of staff to the deputy director and so on, and so on. Much has been written already about this incredibly costly and nearly impossible transition.Remember, our Federal Government, by it’s own admission so it's probably more, spent $1.7B on the website alone (aka marketplace) for the ACA. Have you ever been on that website? $1.7B? Seriously? Private sector web-developers have said they could’ve done it for a few $million but even if they didn't fully grasp the complexity and were off by a factor of 100, that’s still only 10-20% of what the government spent. And the states, for whatever reason, were given the option to not utilize the federal government’s website but the Federal Government would still provide the funding for them to develop their own. States that chose not to use the Federal website spent hundreds of millions of dollars more and some of those websites never did work. Why wouldn’t the Federal Government have provided a template for the states to be able to customize? The entire process was fraught with waste, favoritism, mis-management, and outright fraud.Additionally, we have been promised things over and over again that our government would (or wouldn't) do and that have or have not come to fruition in one way or another &/or that have cost far more than originally estimated - We could cite countless examples (“if you like your doctor you can keep your doctor,” the “highway trust fund,” the Social Security “lock box,” the cost of the F-35 fighter jets, etc., etc.). I’m sure you can think of plenty more. “Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice [or a few dozen times]…” and the American citizenry is tired of playing the part of the fool.Yet, we must solve this healthcare problem. Nobody, and I mean nobody, including the oft deamonized Conservatives or Republicans or the evil rich in this debate are just plain “mean” and want to see their fellow citizens suffer without access to healthcare. But, the notion that as the most innovative and prosperous nation in the world, that the best we can do is to adopt some form of what are, at best, the marginally successful healthcare systems of other countries is simply unacceptable to myself and I think, or at least I hope to most of my fellow citizens. There must be a better way. A way that works for us. But given the false dichotomy we face and in lieu of any viable alternative, it’s probably only a matter of time before we adopt some form of a top down government run healthcare system and once we do, if it fails there's no going back to the old “system.” We all hold hands and jump off this cliff together albeit with some of us scratching and clawing to keep us from taking that giant leap of faith.Even among those who have finally succombed and now begrudgingly support Single-Payer, many, if not most do so only because they don't see any other viable alternative being proposed. And many of those withdraw their support when how the system would work in practice is explained. It’s also become obvious that the Republicans (aka the Stupid Party) do not have a plan and even if they do come out with this “great” plan they’ve been threatening (Here’s the Conservative Plan to Improve Health Care), it’ll undoubtedly be overly complicated and nothing more than modifications to our existing and hopelessly broken system. Amazingly, as far as I know, there really is no other viable, comprehensive, and detailed alternative being proposed other than some form of a top down government run system. I’ve also concluded that any solution to this problem that actually benefits us, the ones paying for it, cannot come out of the healthcare industry. Their agenda, depending on the sector, is naturally to protect their individual pieces of the pie. It also cannot come from government, who’s agenda is to amass more power and collect more of our money to fund the largess of Washington. No, this solution needs to come from someone who's only agenda is what's best for our Country and its citizens.I believe that I actually have such a solution. A unique & comprehensive reform that is in stark contrast to Single-Payer yet one where, because as a society we have decided that this will be the case, the government still plays a significant role and still provides the social safety net that we demand. A plan that I believe will be able to garner the necessary bipartisan support to succeed. It’s not really a conservative plan or a liberal plan. It’s an American plan - One that I think we can all live with (no pun intended). Among the limited people I’ve shared the details with so far, including Single-Payer advocates, Conservatives, and a couple of Canadian friends, 100% have thought my plan had merit. It’s a plan that I believe will actually fix all of the commonly cited issues, including:Significantly bringing down the cost for citizens, employers (public & private), and the government100% Universal coverage for citizens and legal resident aliens100% control over our own healthcareCoverage of pre-existing and chronic conditionsHealthcare no longer tied to employersElimination of medical bills as the leading cause of bankruptciesBuilt-in fraud detectionBuilt in preventative care incentivesFreedom to opt-in to the new system or stay with the status quoConsolidation of all existing Federal healthcare programs: Medicaid, CHIP, Tri-Care, VA, IHS, Bureau of Prisions, ACA, and eventually MedicareMedicare presents a unique problem because we’ve paid into it separately and it’s part of the third rail of politics. It was enacted approx. 55 years ago and according Medicare’s own actuaries it’ll collapse under it’s own weight around 60-65 years from its initial passage (5-10 years from now). Coincidentally (or not?) right around the same time those who were born when it was passed would be eligible to receive it. This is the real reason why the plans being proposed are being called “Medicare for All.” It’s actually much closer to Medicaid for all. It’s actually Medicare by name only, not Medicare as we know it but because our crown jewel of government run healthcare is about to become insolvent and because people have paid into it, it must be killed off and remade under the same name. By doing so, the looming Medicare financial crisis vanishes like magic, just as if David Copperfield himself was Speaker of the House with a magic gavel. And, our seasoned citizens who are on or close to receiving Medicare as we know it don't stage a revolt because their “Medicare” is being taken away - Simply brilliant. The icing on the magic cake is that MFA focus group tests well. Under my plan, it’ll take almost 50 years again to very slowly unravel and it never really fully goes away - It will always be there in some form, incorpotated as part of an overall government safety net. Of course under my plan, people in retirement would be covered and better than they are now.I believe my plan will take our healthcare from its current state of being mocked by rest of the industrialized world to being the envy of the world. A plan so that we can have a real debate between two viable options. We can include a 3rd option of retaining the status quo if we want to include that although my plan allows for anyone who wishes to not switch over however I’m sure, once people see my plan, that few will want to and that a significant majority will support it. However, it is a plan that if most do agree with me, that we’ll have to fight to force our politicians to enact as it takes power away from them and puts our healthcare in our own hands. A plan that the industry will also have to accept, and I think it will - It may even embrace it as a whole or at least in certain sectors. Our healthcare industry must know that the current state of affairs cannot go on unabated forever.The issue with any government run healthcare system is that the endgame is universal coverage by whatever means that is. It forces everyone into the same box. Some will necissarily get better care and some worse. It's analogous to the public schools when we stopped dividing kids based on their intellectual ability. My plan starts with the premise that everyone should control their own healthcare and receive the highest level and quality of care that they desire. Universal coverage is merely a byproduct, not the endgame. This is an important yet maybe, or maybe not, subtle distinction.I am not part of the healthcare industry or government. All I care about is what's best for my fellow citizens and our Country. This idea came to me a couple of years ago. I’m not a policy expert but I am an engineer so I solve real-world problems and while this is not a problem I was asked to solve, it is a topic I’ve been interested in for a long time. My initial inclination was to turn an outline of my plan over to someone who could run with it and I could simply carry on with my life and my business with the hopes that maybe I could take on a cursory role in crafting the end policy. But after numerous letters to politicians, media, political pundits, and some in the healthcare industry, understandably no one took me seriously (and I fully realize you may not either) so I decided to do this on my own which is both a blessing and a curse. A blessing in that I have the vision of how this would all work in practice and that I’m an outsider, yet a curse in that I am an (unknown) outsider, have zero credibility, this is a much more difficult path to take, and is a turn in life that I had not anticipated - This is all uncharted territory for me. But I love our Country and I cannot imagine lying on my death bed and thinking that I had a chance to change history for the better and didn't act. Maybe I’ll fail. Maybe people won’t like my plan. That, I can live (or die) with.I’m currently reading like mad to become an expert on this topic, developing the minute details of how this plan would work in practice, what the legislation would have to look like, developing the economic models to prove it’ll do as intended, and detailing how it would be implemented. I’m also currently a one-man show and I have zero budget. I’ll then be consulting with some experts in certain healthcare related fields to get their feedback and doing some somewhat informal focus group testing to further refine my plan. Finally, I’m developing a marketing plan, will be starting a Podcast, and also a nonprofit to help promote this plan as the book gets closer to (self) publication. I’ll probably have to start a go fund me or kickstarter type campaign just to finance the starting of the nonprofit (it’s not cheap) and for the funds to publish the book (also not cheap).Stay tuned. The working title of my book and this project in general is “Single-Payer Alternative: An Uniquely American Approach to Universal Health Coverage.” I know, it’s a boring title - I’m completely open to suggestions. It’s also a boring, wonky policy subject but one that affects us all. And I’m open to help if anyone is interested. I could use a health economist pretty soon if not right now and at some point, an attorney familiar with non-profits, a copyright editor, a web developer, an administrator/bookkeeper/executive assistant familiar with non-profits, a graphic artist for cover design, etc., a social media expert, and I’m sure many others.Thank you to those who read all of this. It was far longer than I’d anticipated when I started answering this question and as much as I love being on here and Twitter, etc., I’m going to try and curtail my activity and just work on this project - If you like what I’ve teased here, please share the heck out it on any platform you can. This will become OUR plan and it will need to be a grass roots effort. Will everyone love it? No. It will however, I believe separate those who are simply either greedy or who are “tyrants masquerading as compassionate” from those who truly care and just want this problem fixed. (Please note: This was all written off the cuff on my phone when I was away from my desk, so please pardon any typos).