Browns Farm 2012 Web Ad Agreement Form: Fill & Download for Free

CO2 is many things.Essential for life, a greenhouse gas, a polluter.Just as your body needs the right amount of nutrients, the Earth and nature just need the right amount of CO2. As the plants grow, they bind CO2. When the plants die, and eventually rot, CO2 is released, and new plants can use it again. In this way, CO2 goes into a natural cycle. But when we burn coal, oil and gas, CO2 is emitted that is not part of the cycle. Then there will be much more CO2 than nature needs, and the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere will increase.Pollution is not a measure of somethings make-up, or if something is toxic or not, it is about how much of it you have and where. Water is great in the sea. Not great when flooding your house. The US supreme court ruled that carbon dioxide is a pollutant in a landmark 2007 case.“CO2 Is Plant Food.” Conservative climate skeptics call this a sound argument. Climate change communicators should call it what it is: a clever sound-bite that depends on cherry-picked facts and on a major premise that is demonstrably false.”Uprooting the carbon dioxide is plant food argument » Yale Climate ConnectionsPlants thrived during the deepest of glacial phases over the past million years when atmospheric CO2 levels dropped as low as 171 ppm. CO2 availability is not a major contributor to plant growth, compared to available sunlight, moisture, nutrients and proper temperature rangesPlants cannot live on CO2 alone; a complete plant metabolism depends on a number of elements. Plant growth has one limiting factor. In most of the world the limit is water. In mid-high latitudes it's sunlight. In really high latitudes it's water again (for plants frozen water is the same as no water). In tropical rain-forests the limit is trace nutrients; there's practically none in the soil, it's all in the biomass and leaf litter. The thing was that CO2 never was the limiting factor so more CO2 won't give more plant life. Less C02 wont give less plant life.Inside greenhouses, plants get only the extra CO2 and fertilizers, and weeds are not a problem. They dont get the problems from the warming that comes with more C02 which causes floods and droughts in nature.Greenhouses also add extra water and extra nutrients to go with that extra CO2. Without those you can’t increase growth. A recipe analogy. If you use 2 cups of flour, 1 cup of sugar and two eggs to make cookies but you suddenly have a dozen eggs. Does that mean you can make more cookies? No, not without the other elements increasing in your ratio. Well in the real world nutrients and water availability are NOT increasing in the same ratios carbon dioxide is."Changes in vegetation alter the balance between the amount of carbon captured and its release into the atmosphere. Small variations could significantly impact efforts to keep warming below 1.5 degrees centigrade”. Fewer white spots to reflect sun rays means a greener earth is amplifying global warming.Arctic on red alert as lands grow greenerThe brutal truth... the increasing CO2 concentration of the atmosphere cannot compensate the stress of the trees resulting from extreme climate conditions”..Trees growing under simulated heat and drought conditions reveal that the negatives of increased atmospheric CO2 levels outweigh the benefits for plantsStudy shows why trees won't benefit much from extra CO2 in the airThe world is gradually becoming less green, scientists have found. Plant growth is declining all over the planet, and new research links the phenomenon to decreasing moisture in the air—a consequence of climate change.The study published yesterday in Science Advances points to satellite observations that revealed expanding vegetation worldwide during much of the 1980s and 1990s. But then, about 20 years ago, the trend stopped.Since then, more than half of the world’s vegetated landscapes have been experiencing a “browning” trend, or decrease in plant growth, according to the authors.Climate records suggest the declines are associated with a metric known as vapor pressure deficit—that’s the difference between the amount of moisture the air actually holds versus the maximum amount of moisture it could be holding. A high deficit is sometimes referred to as an atmospheric drought.- Chelsea Harvey, E&E News/Scientific American, Aug 15, 2019Earth Stopped Getting Greener 20 Years AgoPlant growth has declined drastically around the world due to dry airAbstractAtmospheric vapor pressure deficit (VPD) is a critical variable in determining plant photosynthesis. Synthesis of four global climate datasets reveals a sharp increase of VPD after the late 1990s. In response, the vegetation greening trend indicated by a satellite-derived vegetation index (GIMMS3g), which was evident before the late 1990s, was subsequently stalled or reversed. Terrestrial gross primary production derived from two satellite-based models (revised EC-LUE and MODIS) exhibits persistent and widespread decreases after the late 1990s due to increased VPD, which offset the positive CO2 fertilization effect. Six Earth system models have consistently projected continuous increases of VPD throughout the current century. Our results highlight that the impacts of VPD on vegetation growth should be adequately considered to assess ecosystem responses to future climate conditions.Increased atmospheric vapor pressure deficit reduces global vegetation growthThe NASA “Greening Earth” study predicted it would happen.“Studies have shown that plants acclimatize, or adjust, to rising carbon dioxide concentration and the fertilization effect diminishes over time.”More C02 also bad for humans;"Simulated multi-models project the atmospheric average CO2 concentrations to range between 794 and 1142 ppm by 2100 (IPCC, 2013)."Effects of low-level inhalation exposure to carbon dioxide in indoor environments: A short review on human health and psychomotor performance[…] This early evidence indicates potential health risks at CO2 exposures as low as 1,000 ppm—a threshold that is already exceeded in many indoor environments with increased room occupancy and reduced building ventilation rates, and equivalent to some estimates for urban outdoor air concentrations before 2100.“Continuous exposure to increased atmospheric CO2 could be an overlooked stressor of the modern and/or future environment”Direct human health risks of increased atmospheric carbon dioxideReality:Someone please tell the farmers of the world more CO2 is "plant food" and “greening the Earth” when they cant even plant their corn or they have their harvest hit by droughts or flooded by billions of tons of water because of AGW. And maybe those same people can send “thoughts and prayers” while we wait for the humanitarian and atheist help organizations to arrive with actual help?Farmers needs stability and predictability, not a rapidly warming and changing world.After brutal spring floods, US farmers face big losseshttps://www.gulftoday.ae/opinion/2019/10/08/extreme-weather-patterns-wreak-havoc-in-india?fbclid=IwAR299ZO6_Q9FY4g3uD7cbM-KB3zhUbZrHtM1EuplCF-s4Mc9AulYgy9rc4ITakeaways:"Growing evidence suggests that environmentally relevant elevations in CO2 (<5,000 ppm) may pose direct risks for human health”Plants cannot live on CO2 alone; a complete plant metabolism depends on a number of elements. Plant growth has one limiting factor. In most of the world the limit is water. In mid-high latitudes it's sunlight. In really high latitudes it's water again (for plants frozen water is the same as no water). In tropical rain-forests the limit is trace nutrients; there's practically none in the soil, it's all in the biomass and leaf litter. The thing was that CO2 never was the limiting factor so more CO2 won't give more plant life. Less C02 wont give less plant life.Increased carbon dioxide levels in air restrict plants' ability to absorb nutrients. Rising carbon levels threaten diets of hundreds of millions of poor. Carbon dioxide makes plants grow faster and create fewer micro-nutrients. Rising carbon emissions could make vital food crops from wheat to rice less nutritious and endanger the health of hundreds of millions of the world's poorest.More C02 is not good for world food production. World hunger has risen for tree years in a row.“Studies have shown that plants acclimatize, or adjust, to rising carbon dioxide concentration and the fertilization effect diminishes over time.”Earth Stopped Getting Greener 20 Years Ago. Declining plant growth is linked to decreasing air moisture tied to global warmingInside greenhouses, plants get only the extra CO2 and fertilizers, and weeds are not a problem. They dont get the problems from the warming that comes with more C02 which causes floods and droughts in nature.There are some short termed positive sides to increased CO2 in the atmosphere for some plants, but the added heat cancels out this, and the net impact is very likely negative, especially in the future. Not all crops are hybrides like durum wheat altered to tackle harsher and warmer climates. Weeds benefits faster from more C02. Biodiversity, insects and oxygen producing phytoplankton in the oceans are already effected by global warming. Farmers world wide are hit hard by floods and drougts. They need stability for their crops/harvest, not a rapidly warming world.Negatives from more C02 include:Plant Extinction Is Happening 500x Faster Than Before the Industrial Revolution. 571 species had definitely been wiped out since 1750 but with knowledge of many plant species still very limited the true number is likely to be much higher.The added heat cancels out any short termed positive effect for some of the plants. Heavy downpours and droughts are likely to reduce crop yields. The net result is depressed food production. Rising carbon levels threaten diets of hundreds of millions of poor. Carbon dioxide makes plants grow faster and create fewer micro-nutrients. Rising carbon emissions could make vital food crops from wheat to rice less nutritious and endanger the health of hundreds of millions of the world's poorest. World hunger has risen three straight years. Farmers world wide are hit hard by floods and drougts. Natural Disasters Are Costing Farming Billions of Dollars a YearPlant quality declines as CO2 levels rise. CO2 enhanced plants will need extra water both to maintain their larger growth as well as to compensate for greater moisture evaporation as the heat increases. Where will it come from? In many places rainwater is not sufficient for current agriculture and the aquifers they rely on are running dry throughout the Earth. Increased carbon dioxide levels in air restrict plants' ability to absorb nutrients. A 20 years study of crops grown under enhanced CO2 finds that there is an upper limit to C3 enhancement from CO2, while C4 plants, after a sufficient length of time, adapt to high CO2 by improving their uptake of nitrogen. So: Increased CO2 ultimately depresses C3 growth, while C4 plants, which include numerous pest varieties, will become more vigorous.Greening the earth adds to the land albedo effect and is amplifying global warming. Two new studies confirm that as atmospheric chemistry changes and the thermometer shifts, so does vegetation’s reaction to climate change. One team of scientists, focusing on any new leaves that plants may turn over in a fast-changing climate, found that leaves will become thicker as carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere soar – the consequence of fossil fuel combustion, and the indisputable driver of global warming. This means that they − and therefore forests − could also become less efficient at sequestering carbon, allowing ever more greenhouse gas into the atmosphere to accelerate warming.Weeds benefits faster from more C02. Pesticides becomes less effective at higher C02 levels. Increase in crop losses to insect pests in a warming climate.Biodiversity is already affected by GW.Insects and their habitats are already affected by pollution and CC. 75% of our food crops and nearly 90% of wild flowering plants depend at least to some extent on animal pollination and that a high diversity of wild pollinators is critical to pollination. Insect pests also “benefits” from warming.Oxygen producing phytoplankton in the oceans are already effected by global warming.Extra C02 makes the oceans more acid. Coral reefs are already damaged from coral bleaching.Climate change happening 'too fast' for plant and animal species to adaptThere's so much CO2 in the atmosphere that planting trees can no longer save usPlant Extinction Is Happening 500x Faster Than Before the Industrial Revolution. 571 species had definitely been wiped out since 1750 but with knowledge of many plant species still very limited the true number is likely to be much higher.“Study shows 571 species “‘Frightening’ number of plant extinctions found in global surveyGlobal dataset shows geography and life form predict modern plant extinction and rediscoveryPlant Extinction Is Happening 500x Faster Than Before the Industrial RevolutionHorror 50C heatwave hits 200 millionRising carbon levels threaten diets of hundreds of millions of poorRising carbon emissions could make vital food crops from wheat to rice less nutritious and endanger the health of hundreds of millions of the world's poorestCertain staple crops grown in open fields with elevated carbon dioxide levels had up to 17 percent lower levels of protein, iron and zinc compared to those grown amid less of the gas, according to a study in the journal Nature Climate Change.Matthew Pot on TwitterMatthew Pot@MatthewPotThe USDA announced that 58% of the U.S. #corn crop has been planted as of May 26th, compared to the 5-year average pace of 90%. This is the slowest pace in recorded history. #NoPlant19 #Plant19202Twitter Ads info and privacy“Across the Midwest, torrential rains have soaked the fields, leaving the sodden soil unsuitable for planting millions of acres with corn, soybeans, and other crops, presaging a terrible harvest. Seeds are usually in the ground this time of year. But thanks to floods, unrelenting rains, hail, and scores of tornadoes—nearly 200 more than average (paywall) by this point in the year—the season is off to one of the worst starts in history. #NoPlant19 is trending on Twitter.”As the climate crisis heats up, flooded farms in the Midwest can’t plant cornCrop failure and bankruptcy threaten farmers as drought grips Europehttps://www.theguardian.com/envi...Another study published in Nature Climate Change last week concluded that higher temperatures will cause wheat production to decline. Just a 1°C rise in global temperature will decrease wheat yields by about 5% (approximately 35 million tons).Climate change will make rice less nutritious, putting millions of the world's poor at riskWorld Hunger Rises with Climate Shocks, Conflict and Economic SlumpsClimate change is bad news for several of our staple crops. For example, a 2012 paper found that higher temperatures are detrimental to French corn yields. While French corn production has increased steadily in recent decades due to a combination of technological improvements and CO2 fertilization (the former far more than the latter), yields have leveled off in recent years, and were particularly low when struck by heat waves.CO2: Friend or Foe to Agriculture? - FactCheck.org_____________________________________________________________________In sub-Saharan Africa, a much higher risk of droughts will lead to insufficient access to drinking and irrigation water, and reduced agricultural productivity.Vietnamese farmers are migrating en masse to escape climate changeThousands of kilometres of dykes, many over four metres high, now criss-cross the delta. They were built principally to protect people and crops from flooding, but those same dykes have fundamentally altered the ecosystem. The poor and the landless can no longer find fish to eat and sell, and the dykes prevent free nutrients being carried onto paddies by the flood.All this demonstrates that climate change threatens to exacerbate the existing trends of economic migration. One large scale study of migration in deltas has found that climate factors such as extreme floods, cyclones, erosion, and land degradation play a role in making natural resource-based livelihoods more tenuous, further encouraging inhabitants to migrate.Vietnamese farmers are migrating en masse to escape climate changeWe have left the stable temperatures that allowed the development of agriculture and human civilization to arise.Estimated 20 years of healthy life lost per 1000 people in Africa by 2050, with south-east asian and middle-eastern regions not far behind.The effects of climate change on hunger | Stanford NewsTrees absorbing less CO2 as world warms, study findsClimate change will make rice less nutritious, putting millions of the world's poor at riskA 16-year study found that we’re at a point where more CO2 won’t keep increasing plant production, but higher temperatures will decrease ithttps://www.theguardian.com/envi...More:During a 20-year field experiment in Minnesota, a widespread group of plants that initially grew faster when fed more CO2 stopped doing so after 12 years, researchers report in the April 20 Science.https://www.sciencenews.org/arti...The assumption has been that C3 crops are helped by higher CO2 levels while C4 plants (grasses, weeds, some grains) are hurt because of the unfavorable CO2 - nitrogen mix. However, a 20 years study of crops grown under enhanced CO2 finds that there is an upper limit to C3 enhancement from CO2, while C4 plants, after a sufficient length of time, adapt to high CO2 by improving their uptake of nitrogen. So: Increased CO2 ultimately depresses C3 growth, while C4 plants, which include numerous pest varieties, will become more vigorous. The net result is depressed food production.http://www.sciencemagazinedigita...Unexpected reversal of C3 versus C4 grass response to elevated CO2 during a 20-year field experimentWolf and Ziska comments:Photosynthesis fight: researchers see green over carbonResponse to Comment on “Unexpected reversal of C3 versus C4 grass response to elevated CO2 during a 20-year field experiment”In a thoughtful consideration of the mechanisms responsible for the unexpected reversal of C3 versus C4 grass community responses to elevated CO2 observed over a 20-year period (1), Wolf and Ziska (2) make many excellent points. However, they inaccurately represent the interpretations and conclusions of our paper, include at least one key factual error, and come to several conclusions that we believe the evidence does not support.Response to Comment on “Unexpected reversal of C3 versus C4 grass response to elevated CO2 during a 20-year field experiment”MORE C02 MAKES PLANTS LESS NUTRIENTNew science just in AUGUST 2018:This is published in Nature:More C02 is not good for world food production.Continued increased CO₂ emissions will make our food less nutritious.The number of people consuming too little protein, zinc and iron will increase by hundreds of millions.In particular, women and children in Asia, Africa and the Middle East will be affected by anemia (iron deficiency) and other deficiency diseases.Several billion people who already suffer from low nutrients will experience deterioration.The world's poorest, which accounts for the lowest CO₂ emissions, will suffer the most. The world's richest, which releases most CO₂ (carbon dioxide), will largely escape because we have a more varied diet.Abstract:“We analysed the impact of elevated CO2 concentrations on the sufficiency of dietary intake of iron, zinc and protein for the populations of 151 countries using a model of per-capita food availability stratified by age and sex, assuming constant diets and excluding other climate impacts on food production.We estimate that elevated CO2 could cause an additional 175 million people to be zinc deficient and an additional 122 million people to be protein deficient (assuming 2050 population and CO2 projections).For iron, 1.4 billion women of childbearing age and children under 5 are in countries with greater than 20% anaemia prevalence and would lose >4% of dietary iron. Regions at highest risk—South and Southeast Asia, Africa, and the Middle East—require extra precautions to sustain an already tenuous advance towards improved public health.”Climate change will make hundreds of millions more people nutrient deficientImpact of anthropogenic CO2 emissions on global human nutritionWorld hunger has risen for three straight years, and climate change is a causeIncreased carbon dioxide levels in air restrict plants' ability to absorb nutrientsPhotosynthesis makes plants important regulators of atmospheric carbon dioxide levels yet this study suggests that it may not be as reliable a carbon-removal system as previously thoughtIncreased carbon dioxide levels in air restrict plants' ability to absorb nutrientsPlants may absorb less carbon under climate change – Physics WorldPlant quality declines as CO2 levels riseSuch claims (more C02 is good) fail to take into account that increasing the availability of one substance that plants need requires other supply changes for benefits to accrue. It also fails to take into account that a warmer earth will see an increase in deserts and other arid lands, reducing the area available for crops. Plants cannot live on CO2 alone; a complete plant metabolism depends on a number of elements. [...] CO2 enhanced plants will need extra water both to maintain their larger growth as well as to compensate for greater moisture evaporation as the heat increases. Where will it come from? In many places rainwater is not sufficient for current agriculture and the aquifers they rely on are running dry throughout the Earth.What about that NASA “Greening Earth” study deniers love to link to?That study included a stark GW warning deniers always “forget” to mention;That NASA study also made it very clear that the "fertilization effect diminishes over time."“The gas (C02), which traps heat in Earth’s atmosphere, has been increasing since the industrial age due to the burning of oil, gas, coal and wood for energy and is continuing to reach concentrations not seen in at least 500,000 years. The impacts of climate change include global warming, rising sea levels, melting glaciers and sea ice as well as more severe weather events.”“Studies have shown that plants acclimatize, or adjust, to rising carbon dioxide concentration and the fertilization effect diminishes over time.”A greening earth also adds to the land albedo effect thus amplifies GW.As the land warms up, trees and forests migrate north. White snow that reflects sunlight back to space is covered with dark green leaves or dark brown tree trunks and branches, which absorb sunlight and convert it to heat, with the same effect of amplifying global warming.Although the greening might sound like good news as it means more carbon uptake and biomass production, it represents a major disruption to the delicate balance in cold ecosystems,” said Keenan. “Temperatures will warm sufficiently so that new species of trees could move in and compete with vegetation that had previously dominated the landscape. This change in vegetation would also affect insects and animals that relied on native vegetation for food.”Darkening the earth's albedo is a very bad idea right now.Latest august 2019:Earth Stopped Getting Greener 20 Years AgoDeclining plant growth is linked to decreasing air moisture tied to global warmingThe world is gradually becoming less green, scientists have found. Plant growth is declining all over the planet, and new research links the phenomenon to decreasing moisture in the air—a consequence of climate change.The study published yesterday in Science Advances points to satellite observations that revealed expanding vegetation worldwide during much of the 1980s and 1990s. But then, about 20 years ago, the trend stopped.Increased atmospheric vapor pressure deficit reduces global vegetation growthAreas Where Cold Temperatures Limit Plant Growth Are ShrinkingFlourishing forests pose carbon questions | Climate News NetworkMore:Ask the Experts: Does Rising CO2 Benefit Plants?Climate change’s negative effects on plants will likely outweigh any gains from elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide levelsA lack of nitrogen or other nutrients does not affect agricultural plants as much as wild ones, thanks to fertilizer. Still, research shows plants “get some benefits early on from higher CO2, but that [benefit] starts to saturate” after the gas reaches a certain level, Moore says—adding, “The more CO2 you have, the less and less benefit you get.” And while rising carbon dioxide might seem like a boon for agriculture, Moore also emphasizes any potential positive effects cannot be considered in isolation, and will likely be outweighed by many drawbacks. “Even with the benefit of CO2 fertilization, when you start getting up to 1 to 2 degrees of warming, you see negative effects,” she says. “There are a lot of different pathways by which temperature can negatively affect crop yield: soil moisture deficit [or] heat directly damaging the plants and interfering with their reproductive process.” On top of all that, Moore points out increased CO2 also benefits weeds that compete with farm plants.IPCC report warns of future climate change risks, but is spun by contrarians | Dana Nuccitellihttps://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/wg2/ar5_wgII_spm_en.pdfThere will certainly be some positive climate change outcomes as well, but all evidence suggests the negatives will far outweigh the positives. Cherry picking one possible positive outcome and ignoring all the negatives as an excuse to maintain the status quo is simply a failure of basic risk management. And with a threat as dangerous as global climate change, engaging in proper risk management is incredibly important. Failure is simply not an option.OCEANS, PLANKTON AND ALGAESFourth National Climate Assessment (NCA4), Volume I“The world’s oceans are currently absorbing more than a quarter of the CO2 emitted to the atmosphere annually from human activities, making them more acidic”. (very high confidence)http://earthsky.org/earth/how-much-do-oceans-add-to-worlds-oxygenURI researchers: Small changes in oxygen levels have big implications for ocean lifeURI researchers: Small changes in oxygen levels have big implications for ocean lifeThe right combination of warm water, high nutrient levels, and adequate sunlight combined can cause a harmful algae bloom.http://www.climatecentral.org/gallery/graphics/algae-blooms-and-climate-changeWHAT ABOUT THE INSECTS?Climate change on track to cause major insect wipeout, scientists warnAbstractIn the Paris Agreement on Climate Change, the United Nations is pursuing efforts to limit global warming to 1.5°C, whereas earlier aspirations focused on a 2°C limit. With current pledges, corresponding to ~3.2°C warming, climatically determined geographic range losses of >50% are projected in ~49% of insects, 44% of plants, and 26% of vertebrates. At 2°C, this falls to 18% of insects, 16% of plants, and 8% of vertebrates and at 1.5°C, to 6% of insects, 8% of plants, and 4% of vertebrates. When warming is limited to 1.5°C as compared with 2°C, numbers of species projected to lose >50% of their range are reduced by ~66% in insects and by ~50% in plants and vertebrates.http://science.sciencemag.org/content/360/6390/791Insects are vital to ecosystems but will lose almost half their habitat under current climate projections.A report from The Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES), concludes that 75% of our food crops and nearly 90% of wild flowering plants depend at least to some extent on animal pollination and that a high diversity of wild pollinators is critical to pollination even when managed bees are present in high numbers.More than 75 percent decline over 27 years in total flying insect biomass in protected areas.'One of Most Disturbing Articles I Have Ever Read' Scientist Says of Study Detailing Climate-Driven 'Bugpocalypse'"A truly scary new study finds that insect populations in protected Puerto Rican rainforests have fallen as much as 60-fold.""Our analyses revealed synchronous declines in the lizards, frogs, and birds that eat arthropods. Over the past 30 years, forest temperatures have risen 2.0 °C, and our study indicates that climate warming is the driving force behind the collapse of the forest's food web. If supported by further research, the impact of climate change on tropical ecosystems may be much greater than currently anticipated."Analysis of 266 insects, amphibians, birds, mammals, and reptiles, suggests many face extinctionClimate change happening 'too fast' for species to adaptClimate Change Is Becoming a Top Threat to BiodiversityWarming rivals habitat loss and land degradation as a threat to global wildlifehttps://www.scientificamerican.com/article/climate-change-is-becoming-a-top-threat-to-biodiversity/With temperatures creeping up as the climate warms, those very hungry caterpillars could get even hungrier, and more abundant. Crop losses to pests may grow.Insects will be “eating more of our lunch,” says Curtis Deutsch of the University of Washington in Seattle.Mammals cannot evolve fast enough to escape current extinction crisisGlobal Ocean Circulation Appears To Be Collapsing Due To A Warming PlanetTHE INCREASE IN MORE DAMAGING WEATHER EVENTS'It's a problem for society': Climate change is making some homes uninsurablehttps://www.cbc.ca/news/business/it-s-a-problem-for-society-climate-change-is-making-some-homes-uninsurable-1.5173697The Number and Cost of Weather Disasters is Increasing in the U.S.Natural & Human-caused Coastal Flood Days in the U.S.Reinsurance company Munich Re provides data about the number of annual disasters, and the frequency of these events is indeed rising:"For thunderstorm-related losses the analysis reveals increasing volatility and a significant long-term upward trend in the normalized figures over the last 40 years. These figures have been adjusted to account for factors such as increasing values, population growth and inflation ... In all likelihood, we have to regard this finding as an initial climate-change footprint in our US loss data from the last four decades.""Nowhere in the world is the rising number of natural catastrophes more evident than in North America. The study shows a nearly quintupled number of weather-related loss events in North America for the past three decades, compared with an increase factor of 4 in Asia, 2.5 in Africa, 2 in Europe and 1.5 in South America. Anthropogenic climate change is believed to contribute to this trend, though it influences various perils in different ways."[1] Climate change: Soil respiration releases carbon[2] Land Degradation: An overview[3] Only 60 Years of Farming Left If Soil Degradation Continues[4] Climate Change Hastened Syria's Civil War[5] The Ominous Story of Syria's Climate Refugees[6] Why This Refugee Farmer Left His Land [Video][7] Salt Is Turning Farmland Into Wasteland Around the World[8] In California, salt taints soil, threatening food security.[9] Seawater Intrusion Threatens Some of California’s Richest Farmland[10] Mekong Delta's saltwater intrusion may hit 45% by 2030[11] Mollic Epipedon[12] Cost of soil erosion in Iowa, not a pretty picture | Agren Tools

They are already here:11 takeaways from the draft UN report on a 1.5C global warming limitUN draft report says missing 1.5C warming target will multiply hunger, migration and conflict, but staying under will require unprecedented global cooperation11 takeaways from the draft UN report on a 1.5C global warming limitLets look at how more C02 is not good for plant life:Increased carbon dioxide levels in air restrict plants' ability to absorb nutrients. Rising carbon levels threaten diets of hundreds of millions of poor. Carbon dioxide makes plants grow faster and create fewer micro-nutrients. Rising carbon emissions could make vital food crops from wheat to rice less nutritious and endanger the health of hundreds of millions of the world's poorest.Plants cannot live on CO2 alone; a complete plant metabolism depends on a number of elements.Plant growth has one limiting factor. In most of the world the limit is water. In mid-high latitudes it's sunlight. In really high latitudes it's water again (for plants frozen water is the same as no water). In tropical rain-forests the limit is trace nutrients; there's practically none in the soil, it's all in the biomass and leaf litter. The thing was that CO2 never was the limiting factor so more CO2 won't give more plant life.There are some short termed positive sides to increased CO2 in the atmosphere for some plants, but the added heat cancels out this, and the net impact is very likely negative, especially in the future. Not all crops are hybrides like durum wheat altered to tackle harsher and warmer climates. Weeds benefits faster from more C02. Biodiversity, insects and oxygen producing phytoplankton in the oceans are already effected by global warming. Farmers world wide are hit hard by floods and drougts. They need stability for their crops/harvest, not a rapidly warming world.Negatives from more C02 include:The added heat cancels out any short termed positive effect for some of the plants. Heavy downpours and droughts are likely to reduce crop yields. A 20 years study of crops grown under enhanced CO2 finds that there is an upper limit to C3 enhancement from CO2, while C4 plants, after a sufficient length of time, adapt to high CO2 by improving their uptake of nitrogen. So: Increased CO2 ultimately depresses C3 growth, while C4 plants, which include numerous pest varieties, will become more vigorous. The net result is depressed food production. Plant quality declines as CO2 levels rise. CO2 enhanced plants will need extra water both to maintain their larger growth as well as to compensate for greater moisture evaporation as the heat increases. Where will it come from? In many places rainwater is not sufficient for current agriculture and the aquifers they rely on are running dry throughout the Earth. Increased carbon dioxide levels in air restrict plants' ability to absorb nutrients. Rising carbon levels threaten diets of hundreds of millions of poor. Carbon dioxide makes plants grow faster and create fewer micro-nutrients. Rising carbon emissions could make vital food crops from wheat to rice less nutritious and endanger the health of hundreds of millions of the world's poorest. World hunger has risen three straight years.Weeds benefits faster from more C02. Pesticides becomes less effective at higher C02 levels. Increase in crop losses to insect pests in a warming climate.Biodiversity is already affected by GW.Insects and their habitats are already affected by pollution and CC. 75% of our food crops and nearly 90% of wild flowering plants depend at least to some extent on animal pollination and that a high diversity of wild pollinators is critical to pollination. Insect pests also “benefits” from warming.Oxygen producing phytoplankton in the oceans are already effected by global warming.Extra C02 makes the oceans more acid. Coral reefs are already damaged from coral bleaching.Greening the earth adds to the land albedo effect and is amplifying global warming. Two new studies confirm that as atmospheric chemistry changes and the thermometer shifts, so does vegetation’s reaction to climate change. One team of scientists, focusing on any new leaves that plants may turn over in a fast-changing climate, found that leaves will become thicker as carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere soar – the consequence of fossil fuel combustion, and the indisputable driver of global warming. This means that they − and therefore forests − could also become less efficient at sequestering carbon, allowing ever more greenhouse gas into the atmosphere to accelerate warming.Climate change happening 'too fast' for plant and animal species to adaptFarmers world wide are hit hard by floods and drougts. Natural Disasters Are Costing Farming Billions of Dollars a YearThere's so much CO2 in the atmosphere that planting trees can no longer save usGreening the earth adds to the land albedo effect;As the land warms up, trees and forests migrate north. White snow that reflects sunlight back to space is covered with dark green leaves or dark brown tree trunks and branches, which absorb sunlight and convert it to heat, with the same effect of amplifying global warming.Although the greening might sound like good news as it means more carbon uptake and biomass production, it represents a major disruption to the delicate balance in cold ecosystems,” said Keenan. “Temperatures will warm sufficiently so that new species of trees could move in and compete with vegetation that had previously dominated the landscape. This change in vegetation would also affect insects and animals that relied on native vegetation for food.”Areas Where Cold Temperatures Limit Plant Growth Are ShrinkingAt higher CO2 levels, leaves can thicken by as much as a third. That changes the ratio of surface area to mass in a leaf, and accordingly changes photosynthesis, evaporative cooling and sugar storage.Atmospheric carbon dioxide levels for most of human history have oscillated around 285 parts per million, but now they are at 410ppm and could reach 900ppm, by the close of the century.At around 710 ppm, and if all plant leaves thickened, the scientists found that plants worldwide would take up almost 6 billion tonnes less carbon.Humans spill around 8 billion tonnes of carbon into the atmosphere as they burn coal, oil and natural gas. So there would be ever more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, and higher global temperatures too.Flourishing forests pose carbon questions | Climate News NetworkDarkening the earth's albedo is a very bad idea right now.What about that NASA “Greening Earth” study deniers love to link to?That study included a stark GW warning deniers always “forget” to mention;“The gas (C02), which traps heat in Earth’s atmosphere, has been increasing since the industrial age due to the burning of oil, gas, coal and wood for energy and is continuing to reach concentrations not seen in at least 500,000 years. The impacts of climate change include global warming, rising sea levels, melting glaciers and sea ice as well as more severe weather events.”“Studies have shown that plants acclimatize, or adjust, to rising carbon dioxide concentration and the fertilization effect diminishes over time.”MORE C02 MAKES PLANTS LESS NUTRIENTNew science just in AUGUST 2018:This is published in Nature:More C02 is not good for world food production.Continued increased CO₂ emissions will make our food less nutritious.The number of people consuming too little protein, zinc and iron will increase by hundreds of millions.In particular, women and children in Asia, Africa and the Middle East will be affected by anemia (iron deficiency) and other deficiency diseases.Several billion people who already suffer from low nutrients will experience deterioration.The world's poorest, which accounts for the lowest CO₂ emissions, will suffer the most. The world's richest, which releases most CO₂ (carbon dioxide), will largely escape because we have a more varied diet.Abstract:“We analysed the impact of elevated CO2 concentrations on the sufficiency of dietary intake of iron, zinc and protein for the populations of 151 countries using a model of per-capita food availability stratified by age and sex, assuming constant diets and excluding other climate impacts on food production.We estimate that elevated CO2 could cause an additional 175 million people to be zinc deficient and an additional 122 million people to be protein deficient (assuming 2050 population and CO2 projections).For iron, 1.4 billion women of childbearing age and children under 5 are in countries with greater than 20% anaemia prevalence and would lose >4% of dietary iron. Regions at highest risk—South and Southeast Asia, Africa, and the Middle East—require extra precautions to sustain an already tenuous advance towards improved public health.”Climate change will make hundreds of millions more people nutrient deficientImpact of anthropogenic CO2 emissions on global human nutritionWorld hunger has risen for three straight years, and climate change is a causeMore:A 16-year study found that we’re at a point where more CO2 won’t keep increasing plant production, but higher temperatures will decrease ithttps://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2016/sep/19/new-study-undercuts-favorite-climate-myth-more-co2-is-good-for-plantsMore:During a 20-year field experiment in Minnesota, a widespread group of plants that initially grew faster when fed more CO2 stopped doing so after 12 years, researchers report in the April 20 Science.https://www.sciencenews.org/article/rising-co2-levels-might-not-be-good-plants-we-thoughtThe assumption has been that C3 crops are helped by higher CO2 levels while C4 plants (grasses, weeds, some grains) are hurt because of the unfavorable CO2 - nitrogen mix. However, a 20 years study of crops grown under enhanced CO2 finds that there is an upper limit to C3 enhancement from CO2, while C4 plants, after a sufficient length of time, adapt to high CO2 by improving their uptake of nitrogen. So: Increased CO2 ultimately depresses C3 growth, while C4 plants, which include numerous pest varieties, will become more vigorous. The net result is depressed food production.http://www.sciencemagazinedigital.org/sciencemagazine/20_april_2018_Main/MobilePagedReplica.action?pm=1&folio=263#pg27Unexpected reversal of C3 versus C4 grass response to elevated CO2 during a 20-year field experimentWolf and Ziska comments:Photosynthesis fight: researchers see green over carbonResponse to Comment on “Unexpected reversal of C3 versus C4 grass response to elevated CO2 during a 20-year field experiment”In a thoughtful consideration of the mechanisms responsible for the unexpected reversal of C3 versus C4 grass community responses to elevated CO2 observed over a 20-year period (1), Wolf and Ziska (2) make many excellent points. However, they inaccurately represent the interpretations and conclusions of our paper, include at least one key factual error, and come to several conclusions that we believe the evidence does not support.Response to Comment on “Unexpected reversal of C3 versus C4 grass response to elevated CO2 during a 20-year field experiment”Ask the Experts: Does Rising CO2 Benefit Plants?Climate change’s negative effects on plants will likely outweigh any gains from elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide levelsA lack of nitrogen or other nutrients does not affect agricultural plants as much as wild ones, thanks to fertilizer. Still, research shows plants “get some benefits early on from higher CO2, but that [benefit] starts to saturate” after the gas reaches a certain level, Moore says—adding, “The more CO2 you have, the less and less benefit you get.” And while rising carbon dioxide might seem like a boon for agriculture, Moore also emphasizes any potential positive effects cannot be considered in isolation, and will likely be outweighed by many drawbacks. “Even with the benefit of CO2 fertilization, when you start getting up to 1 to 2 degrees of warming, you see negative effects,” she says. “There are a lot of different pathways by which temperature can negatively affect crop yield: soil moisture deficit [or] heat directly damaging the plants and interfering with their reproductive process.” On top of all that, Moore points out increased CO2 also benefits weeds that compete with farm plants.IPCC report warns of future climate change risks, but is spun by contrarians | Dana Nuccitellihttps://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/wg2/ar5_wgII_spm_en.pdfIncreased carbon dioxide levels in air restrict plants' ability to absorb nutrientshttps://phys.org/news/2015-06-carbon-dioxide-air-restrict-ability.htmlSuch claims (more C02 is good) fail to take into account that increasing the availability of one substance that plants need requires other supply changes for benefits to accrue. It also fails to take into account that a warmer earth will see an increase in deserts and other arid lands, reducing the area available for crops. Plants cannot live on CO2 alone; a complete plant metabolism depends on a number of elements. [...] CO2 enhanced plants will need extra water both to maintain their larger growth as well as to compensate for greater moisture evaporation as the heat increases. Where will it come from? In many places rainwater is not sufficient for current agriculture and the aquifers they rely on are running dry throughout the Earth.There will certainly be some positive climate change outcomes as well, but all evidence suggests the negatives will far outweigh the positives. Cherry picking one possible positive outcome and ignoring all the negatives as an excuse to maintain the status quo is simply a failure of basic risk management. And with a threat as dangerous as global climate change, engaging in proper risk management is incredibly important. Failure is simply not an option.Plant quality declines as CO2 levels riseTHE FARMERSSomeone please tell the farmers of the world more C02 is "good for us" while they have their harvest hit by droughts or flooded by billions of tons of water because of AGW. And maybe those same people can send “thoughs and prayers” while we wait for the humanitarian and atheist help organizations to arrive with actual help?Farmers needs stability and predictability, not a rapidly warming and changing world.Rising carbon levels threaten diets of hundreds of millions of poorRising carbon emissions could make vital food crops from wheat to rice less nutritious and endanger the health of hundreds of millions of the world's poorestCertain staple crops grown in open fields with elevated carbon dioxide levels had up to 17 percent lower levels of protein, iron and zinc compared to those grown amid less of the gas, according to a study in the journal Nature Climate Change.Crop failure and bankruptcy threaten farmers as drought grips Europehttps://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/jul/20/crop-failure-and-bankruptcy-threaten-farmers-as-drought-grips-europe?CMP=share_btn_fbAnother study published in Nature Climate Change last week concluded that higher temperatures will cause wheat production to decline. Just a 1°C rise in global temperature will decrease wheat yields by about 5% (approximately 35 million tons).Climate change will make rice less nutritious, putting millions of the world's poor at riskClimate change is bad news for several of our staple crops. For example, a 2012 paper found that higher temperatures are detrimental to French corn yields. While French corn production has increased steadily in recent decades due to a combination of technological improvements and CO2 fertilization (the former far more than the latter), yields have leveled off in recent years, and were particularly low when struck by heat waves.CO2: Friend or Foe to Agriculture? - FactCheck.org_____________________________________________________________________In sub-Saharan Africa, a much higher risk of droughts will lead to insufficient access to drinking and irrigation water, and reduced agricultural productivity.Vietnamese farmers are migrating en masse to escape climate changeThousands of kilometres of dykes, many over four metres high, now criss-cross the delta. They were built principally to protect people and crops from flooding, but those same dykes have fundamentally altered the ecosystem. The poor and the landless can no longer find fish to eat and sell, and the dykes prevent free nutrients being carried onto paddies by the flood.All this demonstrates that climate change threatens to exacerbate the existing trends of economic migration. One large scale study of migration in deltas has found that climate factors such as extreme floods, cyclones, erosion, and land degradation play a role in making natural resource-based livelihoods more tenuous, further encouraging inhabitants to migrate.Vietnamese farmers are migrating en masse to escape climate changePLANKTON AND ALGAESMost of the oxygen we breed comes from plankton in the oceans.Scientists believe that phytoplankton contribute between 50 to 85 percent of the oxygen in Earth’s atmosphere.Researchers at Canada's Dalhousie University say the global population of phytoplankton has fallen about 40 percent since 1950. This is caused by AGW:They believe that rising sea temperatures are driving the decline. As surface water warms, it tends to form a distinct layer that does not mix well with cooler, nutrient-rich water below, depriving phytoplankton of some of the materials they need to turn CO2 and sunlight into energy.https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/phytoplankton-population/http://earthsky.org/earth/how-much-do-oceans-add-to-worlds-oxygenThe right combination of warm water, high nutrient levels, and adequate sunlight combined can cause a harmful algae bloom.http://www.climatecentral.org/gallery/graphics/algae-blooms-and-climate-changeWHAT ABOUT THE INSECTS?Climate change on track to cause major insect wipeout, scientists warnAbstractIn the Paris Agreement on Climate Change, the United Nations is pursuing efforts to limit global warming to 1.5°C, whereas earlier aspirations focused on a 2°C limit. With current pledges, corresponding to ~3.2°C warming, climatically determined geographic range losses of >50% are projected in ~49% of insects, 44% of plants, and 26% of vertebrates. At 2°C, this falls to 18% of insects, 16% of plants, and 8% of vertebrates and at 1.5°C, to 6% of insects, 8% of plants, and 4% of vertebrates. When warming is limited to 1.5°C as compared with 2°C, numbers of species projected to lose >50% of their range are reduced by ~66% in insects and by ~50% in plants and vertebrates.http://science.sciencemag.org/content/360/6390/791Insects are vital to ecosystems but will lose almost half their habitat under current climate projections.A report from The Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES), concludes that 75% of our food crops and nearly 90% of wild flowering plants depend at least to some extent on animal pollination and that a high diversity of wild pollinators is critical to pollination even when managed bees are present in high numbers.More than 75 percent decline over 27 years in total flying insect biomass in protected areas.'One of Most Disturbing Articles I Have Ever Read' Scientist Says of Study Detailing Climate-Driven 'Bugpocalypse'"A truly scary new study finds that insect populations in protected Puerto Rican rainforests have fallen as much as 60-fold.""Our analyses revealed synchronous declines in the lizards, frogs, and birds that eat arthropods. Over the past 30 years, forest temperatures have risen 2.0 °C, and our study indicates that climate warming is the driving force behind the collapse of the forest's food web. If supported by further research, the impact of climate change on tropical ecosystems may be much greater than currently anticipated."Analysis of 266 insects, amphibians, birds, mammals, and reptiles, suggests many face extinctionClimate change happening 'too fast' for species to adaptClimate Change Is Becoming a Top Threat to BiodiversityWarming rivals habitat loss and land degradation as a threat to global wildlifehttps://www.scientificamerican.com/article/climate-change-is-becoming-a-top-threat-to-biodiversity/With temperatures creeping up as the climate warms, those very hungry caterpillars could get even hungrier, and more abundant. Crop losses to pests may grow.Insects will be “eating more of our lunch,” says Curtis Deutsch of the University of Washington in Seattle.Mammals cannot evolve fast enough to escape current extinction crisisTHE INCREASE IN MORE DAMAGING WEATHER EVENTSThe Number and Cost of Weather Disasters is Increasing in the U.S.Natural & Human-caused Coastal Flood Days in the U.S.Reinsurance company Munich Re provides data about the number of annual disasters, and the frequency of these events is indeed rising:"For thunderstorm-related losses the analysis reveals increasing volatility and a significant long-term upward trend in the normalized figures over the last 40 years. These figures have been adjusted to account for factors such as increasing values, population growth and inflation ... In all likelihood, we have to regard this finding as an initial climate-change footprint in our US loss data from the last four decades.""Nowhere in the world is the rising number of natural catastrophes more evident than in North America. The study shows a nearly quintupled number of weather-related loss events in North America for the past three decades, compared with an increase factor of 4 in Asia, 2.5 in Africa, 2 in Europe and 1.5 in South America. Anthropogenic climate change is believed to contribute to this trend, though it influences various perils in different ways."[1] Climate change: Soil respiration releases carbon[2] Land Degradation: An overview[3] Only 60 Years of Farming Left If Soil Degradation Continues[4] Climate Change Hastened Syria's Civil War[5] The Ominous Story of Syria's Climate Refugees[6] Why This Refugee Farmer Left His Land [Video][7] Salt Is Turning Farmland Into Wasteland Around the World[8] In California, salt taints soil, threatening food security.[9] Seawater Intrusion Threatens Some of California’s Richest Farmland[10] Mekong Delta's saltwater intrusion may hit 45% by 2030[11] Mollic Epipedon[12] Cost of soil erosion in Iowa, not a pretty picture | Agren Tools

One way of looking at the next General Election is that it is a people’s vote. In a way it is a referendum. If you really believe in brexit vote Tory. If you really are opposed to Brexit vote Lib Dems or Green. If you believe that Brexit can be improved and should be and then voted on after that is a referendum vote Labour. The fact that the Tory’s and Brexit have linked is interesting and I would say from a brexiteer perspective a good move politically. However, this in a way puts Labour, Lib Dem and Greens who’s voters could be more in competition with each other.Let’s for a moment avoid politics and focus on truth. The truth is that due to bad weather, due to Universities on holiday. The fact that British nationals living outside of the EU as well as EU residents in the UK were hampered with voting inevitably influenced the result. We could go much further and say the design of the voting card was to the advantage of brexiteers, as was the incomplete news in the Uk of how policies had been created for more than a decade before brexit. However, on the other side of all this we have to acknowledge that more people turned out for the brexit vote than had ever done previously.We have to also consider that brexit is not only a UK issue. London affects the economy of the EU and actually the world. So there are many mitigating circumstances that should be considered. Much of the rhetoric of the brexit parties I agree with, however if the right conclussion of the all that has been said is to leave the EU is another matter. Will the situationbe better or worse? Nobody really knows until it happens.There is a get out clause in all this that is never spoken of. If brexit was so bad, so disruptive then both the Uk and the EU would have many good reasons for a re-think. With or without Brexit, the Uk and EU are good working together. Without membership is an experiment that could potentially be gone back on. However, I would say that brexit was seen as a potantial answer to what was not working in the UK. Whilst leading the EU may or may not be the best answer. The fact is there were well reasoned debates for both perspectives.I believe the next General Election is what will really decide what is the best way forward. If people are that opposed to Brexit they will vote one way. If they are really for Brexit they will vote another way.However, with the current positioning of parties, what could happen is that although many my want a second referendum or may be against brexit, they are split between parties.So there really are no easy answers to brexit. The democratic will of the people said yes and there are a great many reasons for saying that that yes was not actually democratic.However, what is more important than the question of either in or out of the EU, Is asking the question are Uk MP’s really on the side of the people? If the answer is no, then they will continue behavouir that is seen by the EU and EU citizens as not being good and this will create issues. If the answer is yes. They are really on the side of the people, then perhaps politicians can look at the following and be interested in making this work work for the benefit of the people. Not doing them incorrectly with a whole lot of rhetoric, which is the only opinion that makes the press, but in a more truthful way.The Uk leaving the Eu as a friend is very different from leaving the EU as not being a friend.So remainers have faith, bring this to public awareness and see this election as a type of referendum. The straightening out of the following work can really help the UK in future, if there is political and media transparency and discussion om this.The Tory;s misleading the public is nothing new. There has been more misleading information in more Uk media than probably any other country. This I will explain how this has not only affected Uk politics, but International politics too. I will explain in brief. Since April 2004, three Uk political parties have been copying work unofficially, without any Parliamentary discussion, public transparency or any press coverage from a unique and body of political science work. What happened just after what became known as “The Dodgy Dossier” continued. However, they applied some of the plagiarized work well. Other aspects of it they copied really completely wrong. In order to distract from this, they pointed the finger of blame at the EU for all the wrongs in UK politics, when in fact many of the faults were in the UK and due to the fact no media would question the very questionable practices that were going on and being kept from public knowledge. Anyway, the copied work that Boris Johnson did together with Ken Livingstone when they were mayors of London they did well. This is what enabled the UK to obtain the Olympic Games bid. Which was obtained on the basis of the improvements made to London’s transport over Paris and Madrid.However, other aspects were not copied very well. The truth is that some in the Tor’s Labour and Lib Dems did this and yet today this is never mentioned as it has been in the interests of all those parties to ignore this. However, the work they took and presented as their ideas “the truth” in all Uk media, was not the truth at all. What actually is the truth, as I have submitted in my House of Common’s freedom of Expression and free speech submission is that the copying of this work by them was overall not very good and secondly that the work, which is without question some of the best political strategy work in the world can be straightened out and done correctly in the UK, if the politicians are prepared for the first time since April 2004 to be honest about this.Complete list of concepts from our work that was instigated in London and the UK from 2004.1 Busking Licences for Buskers on the Tube- To enhance the lifestyle of the whole city.2. Ecological Grading Scheme for cars being sold in car showrooms.3. Reduction in car tax on the basis of ecological credentials.4. Free entry to the congestion zone for ecological vehicles.5. Presenting a method of adding renewable energy to existing public transport.6 Encouraging diversification beyond the traditional bus, tram, train,taxi,car options to include other forms of ecological transport.7. Encouraging collective thinking and shared creativity between public and the government to improve services, reduce costs and pollution.8. Using public transport to encourage acts of kindness-as a drive to improve values in society, developed as a message in advertisements on the tube.9 Big Strategy/Big Idea- (1994) Big Society (2010)10. Integrated transport System-(2004)- Primary adaptation to a more caring society can help "problem families" through inducing enhanced economic, community benefits.11. The Funding Agency/Planet Aid Agency LTD. (1991) feeding into Big Strategy became- The Green investment Bank feeding into Big Society Bank. (2012)12. Ecoplaza Lifestyle Centres (original meeting with London Zoo in 1994) Became under Gordon Brown lifestyle centres. (Perfect Storm piece on The BBC News)13. Then Life Centres (Conservative 2010)14. Bike Share- became concept in Ken Livingstone's office.15. Paradigm Shift and cultural shift through the community became Controlled Shift Conservative party Conference 2010)16. A closed Loop feedback System. Ie. One incremental solution feeding back into the system has been mentioned under New labour adapted by The Conservatives to become Feed-In Tariffs.17. Using collective creativity of the public to solve problems and enable the public to submit their ideas to reduce costs increase efficiency- taken up since and partly applied through "the green deal" and "localism" projects. This was unknown at the time of us writing the proposals presenting this as a good way forward for greener and greater public participation in daily politics.18. Expressing the need for the government and the public to create a deal that shifts government and the public simultaneously towards being greener. This also helping small green businesses simultaneously. This became known as "The green Deal. "19. The concept of infrastructure ie. understood as instigating solution modelling with a network structure similar to the internet in communities to improve the local economy and services for local people.20. "We can only win it together" (Ecoplaza 2009) referring to The Big Idea, as presented through the film Ecoplaza Paradise Oasis screened at Copenhagen Climate Conference. "It demonstrates that we are all actively involved and working together." (Ecological Transport System document. 2004) Followed later by "We are all in it together."21. The Marketing to The Big Idea relating it to the phenomenal effort that was achieved in the past sch as during the war effort of WW2. This concept described in depth in our Ecological transport System Document, 2004. This was copied again into the the BBC presentations for the marketing of Big Society on various occasions.22. Creating a "solution orientated Society" where through combined community wide volunteer efforts, services are improved upon and efficiency can be increased and money saved. The application they did was totally incorrect, rather than increasing services and therefore employment too through improving volunteering and cooperation facilities they reduced services and created austerity measures.23. "How did they begin? By Talking." -line in our earlier film referring to Big Idea and Lifestyle centres. (2009) "How is Big Society Going to be Instigated?" "We have to talk about it". David Cameron referring to Big society during presentation to charities and the media in 2011.24. Hubs and Zones are referred to in our documentation to London Zoo in 1992 Also in private meeting held with the employees. This was in reference to the re-development of London Zoo into more of a conservation centre.25. Mentioned at the Tory conference by Oliver Letwin. Applying "A three prong approach to solving climate change." Not how much, but what. having a specific infrastructure to meet climate targets. Best approach for addressing/adapting to and solving climate change presented in our film Ecoplaza as a flexible and adaptive method through shared resource centre's. The three prong approach we have promoted since 1990's and published articles on this in (Levante Lifestyle Magazine Series 2006-2008), we promoted this in IUCN conference in Barcelona and Copenhagen Climate conference 2009, as Plan B for Addressing Climate Change. Ie having flexible rather then fixed national targets and establishing cooperative methods between countries to achieve this. This is also written in our book A Big Strategy. This helps regenerate environment, community and economy simultaneously. This new perspective we presented became the basic key principle of The Paris Accord 2017. Rather than governments attempting to agree on targets, as they had attempted to do for more than two decades of COP conferences, agree to the premise, gain the agreement and then work out and extrapolate the details later.26. Gordon Brown "Plan B for Copenhagen." This got picked up and copied immediately after we had promoted A Plan B for Copenhagen. This had been picked up from our earlier correspondence with a DEFRA employee. regarding green lifestyle centre's See BBC's copy report. "The Perfect Storm-"Plan B is lifestyle centre's for the average earner and everyone else in-between."27. "The Future of Sustainable Development is joined-up-thinking." Tony Blair speech outside Downing Street within one week of receiving our work onJoined Up Thinking. Written into Ecological Transport Network. Additionally, our later book, A Big Strategy has a chapter and a half on what joined-up-thinking is. (A lack of understanding and application of this is a primary reason for the lack of interest and uptake of Big Society. The whole idea was structured around politicians and not the public. The Big idea is for everyone to benefit from.28. Win-win, triple win- Feedback loop concept created, yet never instigated correctly, the closest to this was feed-in-tariffs on solar panels, this was one single application, yet there were potentially thousands. Feed-in-tariffs alone is one aspect of a potential whole new science. It could be likened to using an I-phone only to clean windows with. Feed back loops in society properly applied can generate many meaningful opportunities and more employment that any other scheme applied.29. Our document referenced at 2010 Tory conference upon the introduction to Big Society by one of the four architects of Big Society. ".....we inherited a document from New Labour, Integrated Transport System, don't worry we will not let untrained and unqualified consultants loose on the business world." The audience then laughed with them and at us. Can be confirmed with media of the event. This is one piece of conclusive evidence that our work with Big Strategy is the real origin of Big Society. It demonstrates their wrong perception of their entitlement of taking our work and claiming it as being there's. It proves they were consciously taking this from us and then publicly insulted us makes this all the more unfair, wrong and immoral. Time has proven that it was them that they were unqualified with copying this work, they wasted tens of millions of pounds on their consultants, they achieved very little with it and then ended Big Society this year.30. Proposal of London "becoming the greenest capitol city"- Under Ken Livingstone. If the full Big Strategy model was created properly, London would be the greenest capitol city and have many more facilities, services, jobs and recreation facilities.31. Using incremental solutions, as a part of an integrated/interlinked solution web-like structure to solve many problems at the same time rather than one problem with one solution, in effect being able to find answers where none were previously found or perceived- Len Livingstone speaking to Frost and published by us in an earlier article in Levante Lifestyle Magazine 200832. The social enhancement and lifestyle improvements are an inevitable by-product of environmental and social solutions when introducing "life centres". Media coverage, previously in our earlier Ecoplaza film and articles.33. Proposed light-weight ecological transport for the South Bank. Publicly mentioned on various occasions but not instigated. (Originally in Integrated Transport System). London's cable transport plans, much more expensive adaptation. Our original, based upon wooden bridges running above the Thames would have been greener and generated more employment.34. Improvements to lifestyle as a communal effort by cleaning and greening. -Big Society media coverage with mops, buckets and replanting roundabouts. Relating a collective effort of people working together relating to collective resourcefulness and citing as an example the war effort. (Publicity on Big Society, described in Integrated Transport System.The green content was almost completely taken out of Big Society and at the time of them launching it they were reducing environmental gains over centuries by trying to sell off the countries forests.35. Talking about the integrated nature when applying solutions- Conservatives post Integrated Transport System sent to New Labour.36. The principle that a mutually helping society can be an enjoyable and productive pursuit for all. Tory's Citizens participatory process. "Rather than relying on the system alone. We wrote this in the context of improving transport/services and increasing leisure facilities. Yet when they attempted to instigate it, it was more like using these terms, not instigating the concepts properly and then using this as cover for austerity measures and cuts. With the deficit going up so much, rather than down with Austerity measures. It proves they got it all completely wrong. What should have happened is that by creating new local facilities such as expanding local libraries they then can provide local people with opportunities to meet and get together and from that new services, incomes, projects and small social enterprise businesses can get created.37. Proactive commuters, giving new options beyond the traditional bus, train, tube and taxi options so commuters can choose other modes of travel. (some options were instigated, many were not, such as park and ride on the M25 together with shuttle mini-buses travelling on M25, N&S Circular and main roads into London. This would reduce road congestion in London by up to 15%.38. Vertical planted walls and encouraging buildings to have bee hives on the roof. Instigated in St Pancreas Station.39. Smart Signs- Good city design referred to as "Smart". This was in Integrated Transport System. Based upon Ecotec Dreamtime, Smart Drink bar in 93/94. The "Smart" came from Smart Drinks served there, ie green smoothie drinks, like those now sold in Supermarkets. The "smart" aspect within he original proposal referred to "Smart Communities." Ie, engaged in local issues, wise and pro-active. Has since been frequently distorted into meaning technological equipment based, such as referring to "Smart Metres", Smart Design as in city design etc."40. Creating environmental templates in terms of solutions, such as making painting roofs white to reflect the sun. This and millions of other practices become a template from extrapolation. The optimal way of doing that is through The Big Strategy model applied correctly, so a country can pick up new technologies, ideas and best practices and these can be replicated nationally very quickly and then Internationally. This is what we presented in the film Ecoplaza as being Plan B for solving Climate Change. This coupled with a wide agreement for governments to agree upon as a priority, prior to specific climate mitigation and adaptation targets, this assertion then formed the basis of the Paris Climate Accord.41. Eco-Industrial parks/units- Creating self-sufficient communities by setting up carbon neutral clusters within regions- London's Development Agency Scheme. (Ecotec Industrial Park proposal with Good Earth Community, Reference in A Big Strategy.42. Creating a grading structure on roads based upon ecological criteria through road taxes and through showroom schemes.- Free entry to the congestion zone for green vehicles and through car showrooms. Reference Integrated Transport System.43. Producing environmental measures from both an an ecological and practical perspective. To find and extrapolate efficiently.44. Relating green transport to increased healthy options, lifestyle enhancement and enjoyment, seeing how linking leisure activities such as community gardens in public spaces can increase healthy diet, reduce obesity and provide more people with alternative options for sourcing food, whilst reducing council gardening costs. Integrated Transport System.45. Building a partnership between government, councils, the public and local businesses- promoting social enterprise and enhancing local services- Big Idea findings of 1994, defined in Integrated Transport System, picked up and put into Big Society, yet never implemented correctly by their "experts". So therefore not taken up properly and thus became another u-turn.46. Creating a catalyst away from a Top-down approach as being a crucial factor- Gordon Brown Lifestyle Centres were going to be used for this under a bottom-up and top-down approach, yet the scheme was never instigated. Can be confirmed on BBC News feature. As cited originally in film Ecoplaza, Integrated Transport system.47. Environmental Educational campaigns to households and partnership through government and public deal- The green deal, solar feed in tariff, recycling and community awareness schemes.48. The Big Idea scheme can be promoted and publicised in a similar way to to charity tv and telethon events. Advertising of Big Society was like this with an appeal type presentation made inside the Downing Street.- Big Society had repeated relaunches, was handed to outside consultants and then scrapped a few weeks ago, after tens of million of pounds was wasted and the British people lied too about the scheme for over seven years.49. Relating the launch to public and music festival events-Big Society launch making it look like Jubilee and linking it to art Gallery's. This is what they did in Birmingham during the launch where they incorrectly referenced us "...We inherited a document from the dusty filing cabinets of New Labour, Integrated Transport System, Don't worry, we will not let untrained and unqualified consultants loose on the business world." Reference BBC News coverage of Birmingham Conservative party conference 2010.50. Grants for solar panels with pay back scheme- Feed In tariffs- Integrated Transport System, then was interviewed on this in-depth on this, just prior to the launch, by someone I believe was spying, and staying in my home.51. Encouraging Londoners and other city residents permission to garden and share in the production of food in public spaces, as taken up in Totnes, Torquay and other villages and towns. (Integrated Transport System).52. billboards on the London underground and benches used for projects and government schemes that have a social dimension, promote acts of kindness and giving up seats for elderly people, as absent from public transport at the time- Instigated today with many signs for projects, asking for public participation in enhancement projects for public transport and the community. harnessing collective creativity and embroidered seats asking passengers to do acts of kindness for others. (Reference, Integrated Transport System)53. An open ended improvement strategy created on the principle of "kaisan", the ongoing pursuit of improvement. Whatever is obtained is improved upon on an ongoing basis- self perpetuating improvement. Conservatives cited this in theory yet misunderstood this and simply cited Big Society as being vague and amorphous. Big Idea correctly done is the complete opposite of this. It is super practical and tangible and builds upon positive results which are measured by everyone benefiting, the most vulnerable and needy in society benefiting the most.54. Creative a cross-party approach to solving problems. Big Idea was meant to be apolitical. The Conservatives took it as their own and then did not know what to do with it, handle it, present it. Tried to do it themselves, failed. Gave it to their managers, failed, gave it to their outside consultants, failed, did nothing with it and then scrapped it. They did this whilst wasting millions, lying to the public and all because they wanted to exclude the original green authors of the social enrichment strategy, which was meant to be for everyone and not just for the few.55. Finding the common sense approach to solving problems.- Cited in Big Society media coverage, taken from the original Big Idea as cited in Integrated Transport System.56. We need to promote Corporate Social Responsibility. (CSR) and train agents to stimulate it. Big Society sending council workers on social enterprise courses. It was the politicians that should have been trained by us originally, yet they thought they knew it all. They were too busy trying to sound like they knew what they were talking about and too arrogant to listen to people who had worked in the field for over twenty years, whilst all they had done was pursue their own personal careers and never had any earlier intention to work in the community. Under Margaret Thatcher, The Tory's did not believe there was any such thing as Community. Under John Major they talked about a classless Society. When they talked about it we created it at the venue, Ecotec Dreamtime in Camden Lock. They then took our findings from New Labour and lied saying it was their original work, presenting themselves as the experts in two elections to gain votes. David Cameron's first term, he was voted in on the promise of Big Society.57. Creating new branches of science to solve problems.- Olive Letwin at the time of Big Society introduction earlier mentioned in our communications with DEFRA, under Gordon Brown seeking to resolve what had taken place with the use of our work.58. Sustainable Development Ministry should be introduced. (Integrated Transport System, in 2004 it did not exist. This was later introduced with Energy and Climate change and Energy.59. Finding ways to join business, environment and community- Conservatives use business leaders and sustainable development experts, community workers to introduce aspects of this concept publicly to councils and charities. Yet we were the missing link to provide the details of how they could interact together and thus produce a significant social and environmental benefit on a win-win basis. A Win for the community, companies, charities, local and national government.60. Friendly parking metres is how we described parking metres that could be topped up from a mobile phone. At the time this did not exists. We described this as a time and money saving measure which would enhance lifestyle and be good for everyone. This is one measure that increases the flexibility of travel and therefore can reduce crowding on public transport, reduce city stress, with a positive knock on effect for all.61. promotion of rain connected with historical connections on train stations, ie Sheffield (Steel) Hampton Court (Henry VIII) Nottingham (Robin Hood) Big Society related to Stately homes, museums and cultural buildings. Yet what it should have related too were disused buildings that the community could regenerate together themselves and turn into local cultural centres for mutual self support for the whole community.62. Big Strategy needs to be apolitical to succeed. We stated this in Integrated Transport System. This was based upon our findings of Ecotec Dreamtime in Camden Lock in 1994 with Ecotec Dreamtime. The Conservatives ignored this at first saying that Big Society was there idea, then adapted this by saying it was a coalition ideas and then credited many other parties lying to the public of its origin. After they handed Big Society to their consultants. Their consultants concluded the same as we had originally stated. Big idea has to be apolitical. It should be something for the community, owned by the community and helping all the community. Big Idea can be and should be everyone's big idea, their personal access point into being able to improve their own lives and improve the lives of other people too, through the power of cooperation, supplimented by resources provided by the local and national government. That is how we can all "win it together", as cited in our earlier film Ecoplaza. Which they changed to "We are all in it together".63. Bike Adjusting streets in London to having Bicycle lanes.Stating that the Bike share scheme actually promotes the idea of cycling and that this therefore encourages more people to use bicycles.64. Adjusting Side streets in London to incorporate bike stops for the bike share scheme.65. Converting some residential streets in London after reducing cars in the city to being parks.66. Creating stacking systems for bicycle parking at train stations. (Integrated Transport System)67. To create walking bridges. Bridge created over the Thames and over The Dome.68. To improve transport to such a degree that London would be able to host The Olympic Games and create an Olympic village in a run down area of East London to regenerate the area and provide new long term facilities. (It was cited by The Olympic committee, upon awarding London the Olympic Games. This was done so on the basis of its improved public transport system over Paris and Madrid.69. Look for win-win and triple win in all decisions and improvements made.70. Rewarding the public through helping create social and financial improvements by the public adjusting work and lifestyles to be more socially attuned and greener. Big Society referenced rewarding innovation and changing behaviours, yet this was simply rhetorical and the measures for doing so were never included.70. Tap into and harness the nations collective focus, schools, colleges, universities and retirement homes can be part of a creative base to help provide new solutions in society. ( An Integrated Transport System and Ecoplaza.) Later mentioned in BBC press on "Life Centre's" referencing Sutton.71. Concept of creating middle ground- Integrated Transport System showed how across the political spectrum through Big Idea a middle ground could be created as a vehicle for the green agenda- Coalition tried to copy this, applied it with Green Investment band and retrofitting of old houses/Greed deal. Yet they did not fully apply the model and therefore the result was the failure of Big Society, coupled with severe austerity measures and cuts that then went on to produce nationwide dissatisfaction that then resulted in a more divided society than ever before. Many voted with Brexit as an anti-establishment vote, sensing that something was very wrong, yet without the full knowledge of what has really been going on in British politics since April 2004 behind the scenes. The use and misuse of our work has been why the promise of Big Society failed. It must be remembered that the promise of Big Society is what the country overwhelmingly voted on, and got got The Conservatives voted. They used the Big Society illusion coupled with blaming Labour for the economic crisis in the country at the time, which was in reality the result of a worldwide recession. Everything the public have ever been told about Big Society was either a partial lie or a complete lie. The charity bosses said, "There is a Big Idea in their somewhere". They had known that Big Society was a pirated copy of something else. The Conservatives were unable to deliver on Big Society, because it was based upon our work and therefore they knew enough to sound like they knew what they were talking about, yet in reality there entire party coupled with all of their experts were totally unqualified to be able to deliver the Big Idea properly and provide the very real benefits of the original strategy can provide for every person in the country.72. Zip wires providing entertainment and fun and a different perspective of London. This was opened last week.The true thesis of Big Idea can be read about in the book A Big Strategy. This is the applied science of how society can be better, fairer and improved for everyone and sumarises all the findings of Integrated Transport System into a book. Copies of the original Integrated Transport System are also available upon request.What are the real improvements to the UK if the original Big Strategy is instigated properly by people like us, that know what we are doing.1. An end to rough sleeping homelessness- Accomplished within 6 months at 20% of the cost of the budget currently allocate to homelessness. (Budget is 100 Million)2. Affordable housing for all. This is accomplished by starting at the bottom, solve homelessness and then introduce housing that is affordable for all young people.3. Regenerate the community.4. Improve health.5. Fund positive innovation, putting the Uk back in its rightful place as the leading innovative county on Earth, and thus rebuilt industry for all.6. Reduce pollution through innovation.7. Improve recyling on all levels and empower upcycling.8. Improve thinking and connect this to government for the benefit of all.9. Improve Social entrepreneur knowledge and uptake of good ideas that help companies and communities.10. Promote pride in the local area, the accomplishments of the past, present and lay the support mechanisms to provide support for the future.11. Increase community facilities.12. Enhance volunteering to provide experience and opportunities for employment.13. Improve efficiency through opening up to the public council resources.14. Fund new green inventions.15. Increase International opportunities.14. Create local opportunities.for employment.15. Improve the skill set of all throughout the country.16. Help. Pubs, Libraries and farms diversify and therefore become most economically stable.17. Create thousands of green jobs, starting with a local opperators initiative which enables people to start Bike-share schemes in every town and city creating 1000 green jobs in the first day.18. Improve education. This is firstly achieved by providing super food drinks to all students, making them the most healthy students of any county in the world. This is obtained by them producing their own super food drinks..19. Benefit all charities- This is obtained by encouraging links between charities and providing them with the best innovation information in the world.20. Improve all transport, giving more green transport options to all nationally.21 Help the elderly, provide means for them to participate in wider society for the benefit of all.22. Reduce depression- This is through greater participation and the the utilisation of resources to provide many real opportunities and connect people together.23. Help the disabled- This is achieved by the disabled being able to give to society and generate significant benefit from their input. This generates a more connected society by creating the facilities that enable all to derive benefit as well as improvements to the wider group of people known as the population of the UK.24. Save and create forests. This is facilitated through community wide schemes and through farmers providing land and the use of grass verges throughout the county to provide tens of millions of acres of land that can provide space for forest gardens and reduce the dependency upon food banks.25. Engage the community. This is achieved through people participating for both personal, mutual and collective benefit simultaneously, everyone's life becomes better together.26. Create more enjoyment, fun and happier lives for all. This is achieved by providing new links in community so people can meet each other and find mutual benefit from interacting together.27. Reduce stress- Many are stressed for a diverse range of reasons ranging from too much responsibility, to bullying in the workplace, to unemployment and not enough opportunities. Big Strategy operating nationally can reduce this stress considerably. The latent creative potential of many becomes realised and enhanced the country.28. Build more income streams for NGO's. The charity world and NGO's have not gained the support and funding they used too. Support has fallen away because donors feel the whole system is rigged. The Big Idea would increase pubic understanding of the role NGO's play and enable them to showcase projects in a way that communicates the reality of the situation and what they are doing to help/ Big Idea provides a new genuine platform and a range of facilities to expand upon their good results. It also provides the means for them to work better together to achieve more using less resources.29. Improves and saves resources.30. Increases biodiversity,31. Increases green leisure spaces and facilities,32. Improves understanding of local heritage,33. helps the elderly,34. Reduces depression,35. Improves the lifestyle of everyone, the people with the most difficult circumstances benefit the most,36. Creates new incentives to start positive projects.37. Increases the resources and results of charities.38. Improves CSR.39. Increases exercise therefore improves health.40. Provides new forms of diversification for businesses, so improves the economy.41. Increases organic and home-grown produce.42. Increases renewable energy.43. Improves recycling of resources.44. Improves access to training and skills.45. Helps the elderly and students.46. Increases low cost food options and reduces dependency upon food banks.47. Utilises waste ground and spare buildings.48. Increases local employment.49. Aligns the country to be the most advanced country in the EU in adapting to climate change.50. Provides a climate changes adaptation model for other countries to replicate and so can be the most effective method to adapt to climate change.These are the first fifty of the full 100 benefits. With a team of people that really understand this social science, it is feasible for Big Idea to provide most of these benefits simultaneously. Positive results would be evident very quickly.If the full ins and outs of Uk politics were known to the voters then they may vote differently However, see the General Election as an opportunity and General election as a referendum of sorts. If there are widescale influences opposed to brexiit of if the id thHowever, this is where this get’s really interesting. Boris Johnson and Ken Livingstone doing a good instigation of what I call “ An Integrated Strategy”, namely An Integrated Transport System, for London, proved to me that “Integrated Strategies” do really work in reality. Whilst I was very disheartened by my exclusion from this, fast forward to the start of the Trump Presidency. This issues between The Korea’s seemed to me to be at a level where unless there was a new answer, the situation would very likely follow the course of so many other situations in the past under other presidents and as a result there would be a war. However, the political dynamics of the Korea’s situation was very different to the Middle East and having a war in Asia, nearby many of the most populous cities on Earth, next to China, Russia, Japan, Philippine's, Vietnam, Indonesia was a really big mistake. A mistake that would have almost certainly caused a world war. So I used exactly the same methodology from my work copied by Boris Johnson and Ken Livingstone and used it to form the findings of “An Integrated Strategy for Peace in the Korea’s” This I then sent to people working in The White House.” President Trump, together with leaders from all sides then found a way to step back and into talks. They did so using the strategy I had presented of how to talk the situation into talks and peace.After seeing the success of that I then did exactly the same, using the same formula for the issues between the west in Iran and for Syria. The I did “integrated Strategies” for all of the major issues in the world today. President Trump, whether you like him or not as a President together with Boris Johnson in the early 00’s. Have both used my “Integrated Strategies” to solve specific political issues that no other strategist, thinker, political party or even political system has been able to solve. So, referencing this back to the original question. The fact and the provable testify-able in any court of law truth is that. Western democracies until 2004 used a normal democratic practice that is known and cited in the world’s press every day. However, from 2004 the UK was using both democracy and also “Integrated Strategies” in the context of improving it’s political discourse. A little bit under the Presidency of President Obama some work from “integrated Strategies” was applied and this helped in the obtaining of The Paris Climate Accord and there is one other example too. However, under President Trump, he used “integrated Strategies” as a part of his policy making and this has helped keep both the USA and the world safe and free from wars and has enabled policy decisions in many instances to have been better than they would otherwise have been in terms of saving lives, saving money and creating the capacity to be able to bring home US troops.So, with there being a new science, a new political science that is happening in the world. A new branch of science that has already helped the UK, USA, Russia, China, Philippine's, Korea’s, Japan, Vietnam. Then Iran and Syria together with all the countries that are bordering them you may question why has this not been in the news. The reason is that the story is so big no press want to be the first to bring the story out. Why? The inconvenient truth is that the work links back to the Greens and to specifically Caroline Lucas in a very interesting way. It was upon her advice that I sent out much of my “Integrated Strategy” work was sent out. Without the sending out of my idea’s my “integrated Strategies” the world today would not be in the fortunate position of having potential answers to many of The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, which in fact it does.Whilst the irony of the fact you can have one MP from the left that appreciates the value of “Integrated Strategies” you can have politicians on what is termed the UK right which appreciate “Integrated Strategies” and you can have countries that are the most different from the West is all their thinking towards politics, being able to find at least “something” to agree upon. Some way to find a way initially through gestures of “good will towards peace” the world has in fact began to embrace a new political science that began in London and has now already spread around the world. Whilst this is something in addition to democracy it is something that democracy can draw upon and use when of use. For example in the context of Iran, “An Integrated Strategy” to provide a way to maintain peace was produced within twelve hours. With the issues in Syria and Turkey recently again within twelve hours. The fact is that politics today can be so fast moving. having a way of producing a thesis to get out of any difficult political issue and a way for this to be produced is a very special gift to keeping peace on this planet.The reality is that we live in a very complicated world, where there are today alliances between countries such as NATO,, World Bank, BRIKS,, EU, ASEAN, Bilateral and multilateral agreements. There are the UN countries, G8, Arab League, Davos and a range of other meetings, agreements that link countries together in ways they have never been linked together before.. So therefore, what were conflicts can become wars and then incredibly complicated wars simply by one or two stupid decisions. The alliances in this world are incredibly complicated. Yet the vulnerability of the world is incredibly fragile. In terms of the natural world we can see all around us things are not as they used to be. We can see the largest cities of countries keeping back the effects of climate change by luck and wind direction more so than by skill or technology. We can see Los Angeles, the place that has produced more films about how we saved the planet from everything ranging from Godzilla to Dinosaurs, Aliens to warewolves and vampire’s however that city itself is teetering on what could be a man made natural disaster that could destroy so much. So really our culture as hukna beings that live in cities with smart phones that have a beer on the weekend and watch the tv during the week is being challenged in ways that we as people have never had to even consider before.Due to this, there can be a tendency to do the Ostrich thing and bury our heads in the sand. Change is uncomfortable, weird, should be handled with caution and yet our very existence depends upon embracing this change and fitting it into our national and international development narrative. Whilst a certain amount of world leaders have caught on to “Integrated Strategies” and how they can serve people, all people and planet. They have used them selectively and partly for their own personal political agenda’s. However, referring back to the questions. The Tory’s know very well about ‘Integrated Strategies’ they have used and called upon them since before Cameron was elected and throughout the time he was Prime MInister. They have not told the truth about this and neither have senior members in Labour and The Lib Dems. However, “Integrated Strategies” are no longer just a something in British politics that those in charge think they can take, use and personally benefit from how they wish. They are part of the world wide Insurance policy that is keeping this planet spinning and helping to protect humanity in ever corner of the globe and across the seven sea’s. “Integrated Strategies” today are as much a part of International politics, to those in the know, as The British Empire was. The sun never sets in a place where “An Integrated Strategy” is being looked at by a world leader. So, yes this is a very positive development, yes it does provide new answers to political issues thaat otherwise seemingly can not be answered. Yes, it does preserve life and the life systems on this planet in new and better ways than were aroud when Albert Einstein was on this planet. Whilst the politics of last century was them or us orientated, the politics of this century will become more about how we can all benefit and how we can all play a part and benefit in the process. Whilst in the context of last centuries perspectives there are so many reasons to not agree, today there are new ways and means to agree. Whilst the UK Tory party may want to manipulate voters to vote for them. They have been taking and using “Integrated Strategies” for many years.Whilst President Trump’s Presidency is under the microscope of a full, complete and thorough inquiry. That Inquiry is only fully legitimate if the whole of President Trump’s presidency is fully taken into consideration. President Trump has had a foreign policy conundrum that no other US President has ever had in the history of the USA. What that conundrum is, is this; How does a US President behave when with all the resources of the USA in terms of personal, methods, best practices and personel, there is information being sent through that actually works in a way that is much more in the interests, the safety and the postive development of the country being obtained from outside of the USA. What happened then when this information is not coming from a government, nor from an institution. It is not coming from an organisation or even from a company. What happens how doe the President of The United States of America respond to that really, really good quality information and perspective that is coming from a completely independent, unregistered source? What happens when that information could be in contrast to the information being given to him by his closest and most well established advisers?Well the way in which President Trump has responded to that new information I provided and the way in which he has used that information overall has been exceptional. If the same route had been taken instead by so many other President’s to ignore the information sent or not to consider this in the context of the information he had from his employees, then firstly there would not be the luxury of any “Impeachment Inquiry” today. No the USA and many other countries would be in the midst of a war on a scale that none of us have ever known. If it was not in Asia then it would have been in the Middle East or possibly even both. What President Trump dis is he looked at all the information and in my opinion made the right choices. However, to take this back to the original question again. What was Theresa May doing at the time of me writing my peace documents, based upon the work that her political party have been not telling the British people the truth about for years? She was preparing an aircraft carrier to be sent to Asia. Well all I can say is thank God that President Trump chose what my work was saying about having talks and all the many other aspects of that over and above what she was considering at that moment in time. and a war was prevented. So President Trump in the context of US Foreign Policy” listens to what various people advise. I’m one of those people. Due to the fact that the Tory’s do not want the truth known that they were copying my work, without my permission for years and given the fact that their chums run the UK press and have influence over the US press. The truth is that both UK and US citizens are being given on a daily basis “Fake News”. In order to further confirm what I’m saying the above is the latest example and I will provide many examples that date back to 2004 together with the misrepresentation of the news by New Labour.So I wrote to the former Chairman of The Conservative Party about the Conservative Party taking and using my work in the context of my work Big Strategy that got turned into so many of their policies. The letter I got back, which I would be willing to present in any court of law either in the UK or the USA was blaming Labour. Well I hope all those Tory’s that have their lovely houses bought in part by copying my work, that have their lovely sons and daughters at private schools that have their lovely luxuary holidays, that fiddle their expenses, that spend their entire careers misleading the public, taking from the British people all they can, reducing the gains that our forefathers fought and died for in wars. Whist they continue to pretend that they are helping the country, they are there for the people, whilst they use inflammatory language, yet recruit more police, yet reduce human rights, yet control the media, yet prevent the real work that is being done that actually protect The British Isles and many other countries in the world being even known of. The reality is that unless I had produced my work that they have worked so hard to suppress and to cover up they possibly would not even be on the planet today. If President Trump would have not listened to me, A A Dove with an attitude” and would have listened to “Hawks” instead, if the USA and Theresa May would have gone against North Korea. The North Korea, having already sent a missile over Japan could have responded by taking out the third most important stock market, Tokyo. North Korea with it’s cyber capabilities could not only have wrecked further havoc online. it has the capacity of EMP weapons that can stop technology. It has the capability of affecting the Internet cable. It has nuclear sites that could have contaminated the food supply, fish of many countries in the region. The links of North Korea to China and Russia, could have created a scenario where there was an opposing force on the border of the USA in Alaska. Russia with it’s 7000 nukes and the Uk with it’s 240. Yes NATO would have helped the USA and UK, however the entire situation would not be what is is today and that is for certain. That is said without factoring in all the unintended conseqences of a similar situation in Iran with the fact that country has 15 land borders and any attack on Iran would likely result in a reaction to Saudi Arabia, which has Mecca, which then brings into that situation every country in the world with a Muslim population, which is more or less every country. That’s without talking about Syria, which unless there was “An integrated Strategy” for there then there would have been two nuclear powers, Turkey and Israel a few hundred miles apart and then two other nuclear powers USA and Russia in the middle. The facts and the truth are this, that “Integrated Strategies” have helped prevent all these scenarios’s President Trump looking at this work and using this work wisely has kept world peace in the past three years. If the UK would have entered into any of the above scenario’s, which could well have happened with the Tory’s being the only voice of reason coming from the UK, they would not be in the situation they are in today to have the false believe that they are the “sensible party” in Uk politics. Far from that, without my work, that they do not ever consider “credible” yet have used this for the main narrative of their politics for the most part since Prime MInister John Major was leader. They really would not be in the safe and secure position they are today.President Trump, when it really counts has listened and although he does his politics in his own way. His interpretation and use of “integrated Strategies” has been the best of any leader since Boris Johnson used these for London as Mayor. Now it makes much more sense politically for the UK and the Uk press to accept waht has really happened and to amend all the fake news in the UK press that has been manufactured since Prime Minister’s, Mayor’s, Minister’s and MP’s began copying my work. It would be much better for this to be known in the UK and then possibly if the electorate wanted this for the work already instigated in order to be of the maximum benefit to the UK. If that does not happen, or should I say in addition to that happening, I connected and in contact with both White House employees and with Senator's from both the Republican and Democratic Parties in the USA. I cannot sit by and see President Trump potentially be impeached on the issues regarding Ukraine without also at least putting forward my explanation of how President Trump has also skillfully enabled the world to avoid World War 3 on three occasions. Whilst President Trump’s politics in many ways do not align to my politics. I believe resolutely in Climate Change and that this is the greatest threat to mankind. However, I also appreciate that good action with Climate Change would be impossible if there is a war. Therefore, President Trump has prevented this three times and in many ways has actually resolved or at least calmed issues that were of equally great concern under President Obama, such as the wider issues in Ukraine and the troops being located on the border of Russia. Whilst the US and Uk media against were focused for months on the concept of whether or not their was collusion with Russia or whether or not their has been the influence of Russia in elections. President Trump has helped mitigate that danger by his relations with President Putin. So, the conclusion here is that the press both in the UK and the USA with their focus on the present and the near future are completely failing the people in being able to join up the dots in how we arrived where we have arrived and that is in a place where there are new answers to the worlds issues. The UK and US media not acknowledging this, together with The Tory party themselves being caught doing the same actions that they in their unreleased report claim Russia was doing is not a decent action. it is not an ethical action. it is not an action that is in the interests of any British people whether they are voters for Conservative, Labour, Greens. Brey or any other shade of the British political spectrum. They are lying on top of lies, cheating and actually doing harm not only to their own cause. The Conservatives after all are meant to be respectful and respectable from what I have heard. They are doing an injustice to the entire fabric of the British way of life of fair play. That is the greatest concern and threat to the UK today. So really I would hope that not only do they apologize for that, they apologize for this too. This is the best and easiest way to get UK politics respected again. By cheating, they are only cheating themselves. Boris Johnson, knows that all that I write here is true and this of course I can prove with solicitor signed documents, letters and references from BBC broadcasts. I want to have faith in Uk politics and the media, however, if they still feel unable to tell the truth, full truth and nothing but the truth to the British public on the use and abuse of political strategy work in the Uk, then hopefully putting my Statement to the US justice system in the context of President Trump also using the same work with be heard and considered.I provide references here to the Uk’s use of my work from 2004 and this being unreported in the press. I also provide a list of benefits of this political science work being used correctly what would be the results and the benefits to the UK.e best case scenario brexit. There are so many opportunities in the findings of this work; for the Uk and wider world..