A Literature Review On Importance Of Creative & Innovation - Ijrmee: Fill & Download for Free

There are two main kinds of literature review: 1) the review written for a term paper, thesis, or research article, and 2) literature reviews that are free-standing articles that are intended to describe the "state of the art" of a particular research field or specialty. This second kind of review may appear in journals or in books published annually called "Annual Review of Psychology," or whatever other field.Your objectives are somewhat different in these two cases. In the first case, the purpose of your literature review is to put the main study or analysis in context. Regarding the first kind of review, here is some text from an article of mine that is to appear in a 2016 book:"One of the standard requirements of an academic article is that theauthor should show how the work fits in with other research andthinking in the area. This is not an idle requirement of fussy journaleditors; it is done for a reason. Work that is published should not onlybe new, but also be shown to be new. One does this by describing priorwork and explaining how the current work relates to the prior workand yet advances beyond it. The literature review in an article (1)contextualizes the research presented in the article, so the reader can seewhere the work fits with other work in the field; (2) demonstrates thatthe author is current with other work in the area, and so is not rediscovering things already known; (3) affords recognition to those authorsfor the earlier work; and (4) claims its own new territory.So the literature review, which may be seen superficially as a boringprelude to the real action of the article where the research is described,is actually a socially very significant part of the article, andneeds to be thought about carefully." (In M.J. Bates (2016). Many paths to theory: The creative process in the information sciences. In D. Sonnenwald (Ed.), Theory development in the information sciences. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, p. 28).The purpose of the second kind of review is to survey the current state of the art in a research specialty. These are usually written by experts in that specialty. For example, the Annual Review of Psychology usually has about 20 articles in it, covering important areas within the field of psychology, and written by people well-known in each of those areas. Topic reviews may be repeated every year or once every several years, depending on their importance in the field.So with this kind of review, you want to be sure you have found all the good research literature since the last review. You search exhaustively for the publications, keeping some sort of record of them, such as in an EndNote file. You read over the articles, group them by sub-area, and/or by hot-topic research questions, then summarize the state of the art in each of these sub-areas. You are telling readers where the research front stands in each of those areas.

Writing a literature review requires not only good writings skills, but also a deep knowledge about making it informative as well as creative and appropriate.A good literature review don't only show a great background and sources used for your papers, but also demonstrate a strong connection between the field/sphere and your work.So, what things should be learned before starting writing?Define your content: what should be included, what should be missed, what is important or notMake sure your work has a strong idea which is supported by all the sources which you useDefine an exact capacity for your review: typically that is about 25% of your academic paperWrite a plan or a list of questions which will guide your workShow your researching skillsTake care about keywords and key themesAsk someone who could critically sum up your review to read itSure, those tips would help you.

I'm doing this right now — the literature review from my PhD thesis just got accepted as a review paper.My tips & experiences:Ideally, you decide that you want to publish your literature review in a journal before you write it up, so you can write it in a form that is suitable for an academic journal and won’t need much revising and adapting for the journal publication (you are typically much more free in your dissertation, where you can include stories, quotes, and other creative elements).Moreover, knowing that you will publish your literature review in a journal can greatly increase your motivation to put in the needed effort and do it properly.However, a literature review in a dissertation is typically more detailed and contains more background information than what you would publish in a journal, so you should be prepared to remove some bits for the journal publication. How much background information is appropriate to keep depends, among others, on whether there are other (recent) reviews published on the same (or related) topic. In my case, there was no review paper ever published on my topic, so I kept almost all content from my dissertation review.Next, there is the question of where to publish your review article. Depending on your discipline, it can happen that most reputable review journals publish only upon invitation. Nevertheless, some of them allow you to make suggestions, that is, you can inquire with the editor whether they are interested in your manuscript. Otherwise, shorter reviews are typically published also in “normal” journals, which focus on original research articles.In my case, the manuscript was too long for most “normal” journals, and invitation-only journals didn’t answer my inquiries.. But I found a less-known journal with a lower impact factor that allowed for longer reviews without invitation. Important for me was that they offer an open-access option — because publishing open-access is (slowly) becoming more relevant than journal’s impact factor (Point of View: How open science helps researchers succeed).So: go ahead & publish the literature review from your thesis! It feels great that all the hard work was not for nothing and the review gets the readership it deserves :)