Scope Of Work John Snow India Private Limited: Fill & Download for Free

Bangalore is also known as the ‘garden city of India’. With its pleasant climatic condition, Bangalore is one of the most favorable places to visit. Bangalore has the perfect blend of various historical places, traditions, different cultures, modernization, the colorful gardens and the pleasant climate adds a flavor for the tourist to visit. Bangalore has everything for a taste of all kinds of people, be it young or old, you are sure to get your corner of interest in this blooming city.There are many tourist places to visit in Bangalore. To name some of the attractions in Bangalore are the Nandi hills, Vidhana Soudha, Tipu Sultan's Summer Palace, Bangalore Palace, Jawahar Lal Nehru Planetarium, Innovative Film City, Wonder La, Bangalore Fort, Iskcon Temple and Big Bull Temple are only a few. A mixed blend of the religious temple to the exciting Film city is a worth experience in Bangalore.You will also have various options to visit the parks and get yourself relaxed amidst nature. Not only children but also adults love to visit the vast gardens with attractive fountains, different flowers, butterflies of a different. To name just a few of the parks in Bangalore are the Cubbon Park, Bannerghatta National Park, Indira Gandhi Musical Fountain Park, Bugle Rock Park, Butterfly Park, Lumbini Gardens and Freedom Park.As the name goes this is one of the most popular places to visit in Bangalore which is known for offering the spectacular sunrise from the top. Nandi Hills, otherwise called Nandidurg or Nandi Betta is an old slope fortification arranged in a region called Chikkabalapur in Karnataka. Arranged close to the town of Nandi, the antiquated conviction is that they are the cause of the Arkavathy River.At a tallness of 4851m above ocean level, Nandi Hills is a most loved spot for all nature lovers and is also favourites as a picnic spot. For those of you who are planning to take some photos and adore the beauty of nature then Nandi Hills is the perfect weekend getaway from Bangalore for you. Soak in the stunning view, amazing greenery, cool breeze and silence which makes the hills a perfect place for vacation.The best time to appreciate the excellence of this beautiful place is early mornings.In spite of the fact that you can visit the slopes whenever of the year, it is prescribed to go amid the stormy season. here are numerous stories about the name of Nandi Hills. Amid the Chola period, Nandi Hills was called Ananda Giri meaning The Hill of Happiness.While you are visiting Bangalore you would definitely want to visit the one and only Wonder la. As the name goes this amusement park is a perfect place in Bangalore for a day out with lots of fun and thrills. Wonder la is the loudest, craziest and the most astounding piece of Bangalore city. Whether you are planning to spend some big fun this place will definitely make everything an adventure for you and your loved ones.Head out for one of the many invigorating rides, or just laze by the pool. In any case, whatever you do, here, everyone gets to enjoy their part of the fun. What's more overcome your fear as you try the water rides or just soak in the beauty of the region? The park features a wide assortment of attractions including a few rides, water rides, a musical fountain and laser shows, a virtual reality show. Wonderla Bangalore has an undeniable dance floor with some twist, the electronically controlled rain showers. Wonderla likewise has attractions uncommonly intended for youngsters, and these are delicate yet irregular like a kiddies free-fall ride.There is no doubt in that Bangalore is the one city which holds some of the best places to visit. This stop is a noteworthy touring fascination, with 300 sections of land of green foliage. Having been set around Lord Cubbon, it is a perfect place for nature significant others and those looking for a quiet climate. It highlights a bandstand that hosts shows. The Bangalore Aquarium is likewise arranged in this park, and is a must visit for you in Bengaluru, being the second biggest aquarium in India.The park also houses buildings that are aesthetically designed, magnificent statues of famous personalities, and rich flora and fauna. The popularity of the park can be gaged from the way that Bengaluru is nicknamed the Garden City after the park. One can see a variety of park-flowerbeds, massive bamboo trees, monuments, statues and buildings which makes the landscape stunning for not only tourists but also enthusiasts, nature-lovers, joggers, naturalists and botanists.Cubbon Park was made by the British Chief Engineer of Mysore, Major General Richard Shankey in the year 1870. At first in 1870, the recreation center was named after the then acting Commissioner of Mysore, Sir John Meade, as the Meade's Park. Statues of Queen Victoria, King Edward VII, Sri Chamarajendra Wodeyar, Major General Sir Mark Cubbon and Rajya Dhurandhara Sir K. Sheshadri Iyer are introduced in the recreation center complex.While at the park you will see botanical species of both native and exotic types. Some of the native species are ficus, cassia fistula and artocarpus, the exotic ones include bamboo, peltophorum, araucaria and mahagoni. More than 6,000 trees and plants cover the park area here. While walking through the the streets of the park one can see the park ornamented with beautifully lined outlandish blossoming trees. One of them, the silver oak, is among the main oaks that were foreign made from Australia and introduced in Bengaluru.The Lalbagh Botanical Garden, Bangalore is of royal origin and was begun at first as a private garden in a region of 40 sections of land by Hyder Ali, most famous rulers amongst the most well known leaders of old Mysore in 1760. At first planned in Mughal style, on the model of a broad garden at Sira in Tumkur close Bangalore, this garden was additionally created by Hyder Ali's child Tipu Sultan and hence by the British and Indian doyens of horticulture by an expansion of range and option of various plant species.Lalbagh, for its one of a kind garden in supporting the idea of agriculture and helping the advancement of cultivation, has earned a pride of place among the gardens of the world and it has come to be viewed as one of the best gardens in the East for its design, maintenance, scientific treasure and scenic beauty. This place is magnificence in Bangalore which holds some of the best genetic resource centre for introduction, acclimatization and maintenance of plants; it envisages documentation of the variations available in plants of ornamental and economic value.It helps the advancement of cultivation in the state. It is a significant assistant to botanic study in educational institutions, an imperative lung space of Bangalore, a position of excellence that gives sound entertainment to the general population and it gives a scene to individuals to draw near to plants and nature.The garden with well-laid out streets, ways, open spaces, shade and a decent accumulation of many sorts of plant species draws in an extensive number of guests. Lalbagh is all around secured with stone walls as fenced in areas and it has four approach entryways. The principle entryway is at the North confronting towards Subbaiah circle, the West door is towards Basavanagudi, the South entryway is towards Jayanagar and the East door is towards the Double Road.The IT city, Bangalore is not only known for its fast forward work life and the day to day culture but also for the amazing attractions here. People from around the world come to visit Bangalore not just to make their living a better one but also to enjoy the beauty of this region. One of the main tourist places to visit in Bangalore is the famous Jawaharlal Nehru Planetarium. It planetarium has a Science Park and the Science Center. The most well-known show in the Jawaharlal Nehru Planetarium that pulls lakhs of people round the year is the Sky Theater.Sky Theater incorporates utilization of various visuals like computer animations, cartoon special-effects, and video clippings. The planetarium has an aggregate limit of 210 seats. One can also enjoy viewing of astronomical events such as solar eclipse, the transition of planets, passing of comets, etc. Amid this time, special preparation is made, such as introducing versatile telescopes in the open zone of the planetarium. For live scope show of astronomical events occurring vast display screens are furnished with exceptional video projectors. While visiting the planetarium one can also see that various educational activities and experiments on rocket launch, atmospheric pressure, and speedometer are held for the benefit of students.The classes are led on ends of the week from 10:30 in the morning till 4:30 at night. Short instructive projects and courses are embraced utilizing casual techniques amid summer vacations of the students. Distinctive projects like Tiny Tots, BASE Camp, PC helped Learning, one-day workshop for school understudies, and From Web of Life to Universe are led for students of various levels, beginning from class III till graduation. Unique workshops are additionally directed for physically challenged students.Although Bangalore is known to have the best weather of all times but still to beat the summer one definitely needs a getaway. With the perfect mixture with fun and snow, Snow city in Bangalore is another great place which is a must visit for you. Snow City, is one of the newest places in Bangalore to visit. This indoor snow-themed park has a zone of 12,500 sq feet and is a piece of the Fun World Complex.Head out with your friends and family and spend some time playing some of the adventurous games here. While at the snow city you can indulge in some activities like snowballing, mountain climbing, sliding, Zorbing, basketball, dancing, etc. alongside a fantasy snow castle and also the first of a kind 5D theatre enhancing your experience.While you are heading out for some fun time in Bangalore don’t miss your visit the one and only Innovative Film City which is another attraction here. The Innovative Film City in Bengaluru is an Indian theme park. It is situated at Bidadi, recently off the Bangalore-Mysore Highway and is effortlessly receptive by street. The Film City has a brilliant blend of various themes which advance for both children and in addition adults.Spend your day away from the hustle and bustle of life and indulge in an array of adventure in the park. Whether you are planning to visit this place with your friends or family you will have the best of experience here. Here children can play with different roles like fire fighter, policeman, specialist, pilot, and so forth with practical ensembles and types of gear. One of the best thing about this place is that one can explore a lot of places like Ripley's Believe It Or Not, Dinosaur World, Haunted Mansion, Wax Museum and Miniature city are few of the places to see in Bangalore that will definitely make you explore a lot more interesting.Visit the Wax Museum and click a picture with your favourite character or enjoy the miniature city where you can see various miniature replicas of various wonders of the world. And then again after your soulful explore, you would definitely want to fill your stomachs. For that, you have the one and only Moulin Rouge theme restaurant just inside the park. One can pick choose from various cuisine like French, Mexican, Italian and so on to eat as the DJs keeps you engaged with great music. One can even host a private gathering of up to 200 individuals here.If you’re interested in naturally crafted bears, then you must set your GPS straight for Toit. Famous for being one of the most amazing microbreweries among places to visit in Bangalore, Toit will charm you with fabulous foods in an unforgettable experience.Serving unique beers, this place is a must visit for all looking for an enthralling and boozier night in Bangalore.Now if you are in Bangalore then there is no doubt that you haven’t heard about this rocking place in Bangalore. Brigade road is the most happening part of the city. If you are new to Bangalore then this place is a must visit for you. From various pubs in Bangalore to the latest branded shop you will find everything at this place. Brigade Road is another famous shopping centre, particularly with the youths. There's an entire group of spots to shop at, including a high road chock-a-hinder with Mark showrooms, road slows down and multi-mark arcades.Vera Moda, Lee, Van Heusen and Louis Philippe have their leads here, while Fifth Avenue, Mota Royal Arcade and Eva shopping centre at Residency Road house a variety of various brands and remain open till later at night. The road slows down are heaped high with unbranded shoes, garments and knickknacks, and when you need break, there are a huge number of bars and eateries to stroll in to. Head out to this amazing road in Bangalore and spend some time with your loved ones while exploring the whole place.Charm your party demons with the nightlife at Big Brewsky in Bangalore. It boasts of an open-air poolside seating serving freshly brewed beer. It features live performances and makes up a compelling case for foodies with their Continental, North Indian and Thai dishes.Standing out amongst the tourist places in Bangalore, UB City Mall is famous for being India’s first luxury mall. If you wish to indulge in some high-end shopping, then this place is your one-stop destination in Bangalore.Along with shopping splurge, UB City Mall offers many other things like lavish dinner places, spa breaks and many fun places to take care of all your needs.

Yes, because more trees are good for us and the environment and cutting emissions is useless and harmful to the environment when the science of human caused global warming is not settled and shoddy.Ask yourself what is the greatest environmental problem causing the most immediate harm to mankind? If you said global warming or climate change you are wrong. Think about the Medieval Warm period when civilizations prospered in every way because of the warming.How Global Warming Made Civilization PossibleNow if you said the greatest environmental disaster killing more than 4 million annually is HOUSEHOLD AIR POLLUTION. You are right.The major environmental harm from climate change theory and alarmism is the broad hindering of the use of cheap fossil fuels like coal to reduce the horrible death rate of more than 4 million annually from Home Air Pollution. The victims need to be on the electric grid and stop harmful outdoor cooking with solid fuels, but the false theory that carbon dioxide has a climate effect and the Paris Accord have demonized coal when this is the best path and essential to bring grid power to Africa, India and China etc.HOW COOKING OFF GRID KILLSCookstove Smoke is “Largest Environmental Threat,” Global Health Study FindsPosted by Marianne Lavelle of The Daily Climate on December 13, 2012 (3)http://energyblog.nationalgeographic.com/2012/12/13/cookstove-smoke-is- largest-environmental-threat-global-health-study-finds/A woman bends over an improved cookstove in Cameroon. Photo courtesy of Trees for the Future/Flickr.In a finding that confirms the devastating health impact of energy poverty, the landmark Global Burden of Disease study published today tallied 3.5 million annual deaths from respiratory illness due to burning of wood, brush, dung, and other biomass for fuel.The Global Burden of Disease Study (GBD) is the most comprehensive worldwide observational epidemiological study to date. It describes mortality and morbidity from major diseases, injuries and risk factors to health at global, national and regional levels. Examining trends from 1990 to the present and making comparisons across populations enables understanding of the changing health challenges facing people across the world in the 21st century.]Cooking on traditional cookstoves is a far greater risk factor than poor water and sanitation, lead or radon pollution, or smog (ozone) and outdoor soot, according to the study in today’s Lancet, the largest ever systematic effort to describe the global distribution and causes of mortality. The data indicate that respiratory illness from breathing the emissions from inefficient cookstoves causes more than double the annual deaths attributed either to malaria (1.2 million) or to HIV/AIDS (1.5 million).Seven research institutions from around the world, including Harvard University, Johns Hopkins University, Imperial College London, the University of Tokyo, and the World Health Organization (WHO), collaborated on the study, which was funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. (Related: “How Healthy is the World?”) The research was much expanded in scope from the 1990 Global Burden of Disease study funded by the World Bank.The new study, if compared to the figures from 20 years ago, marks a decline in global deaths due to cookstove pollution (which stood at 4.6 million in the 1990 study.) But it is roughly double the 2 million annual figure that WHO has been attributing to deaths due to indoor smoke from solid fuels.“These results provide further momentum to our mission to ensure that cooking doesn’t kill,” said Radha Muthiah, executive director of the Global Alliance for Clean Cookstoves, a public-private partnership that has been working to deploy cleaner, safer cookstoves.Added Kirk R. Smith, a professor of global environmental health at the University of California, Berkeley, and a co-author of The Lancet article, “One of the most alarming findings is that smoke from cooking fires was found to be the largest environmental threat to health in the world today.”The most harmful environmental impact killing at least 4 million annually is often ignored and is relevant to future tragedy of advancing and following the unfounded theory of climate change. The alarmism carbon reduction targets implemented by the Paris Accord aimed at ending the use of cheap coal and other effective fossil fuels for electricity if followed will cause horrendous health harm to the underdeveloped living in the dark in Africa, India and Asia and more.COOKING OUTDOORS WITH HIGHLY POLLUTING SOLID FUELSHousehold air pollution and health8 May 2018Cookstove Smoke is “Largest Environmental Threat,” Global Health Study FindsPosted by Marianne Lavelle of The Daily Climate on December 13, 2012 (3)http://energyblog.nationalgeographic.com/2012/12/13/cookstove-smoke-is- largest-environmental-threat-global-health-study-finds/A woman bends over an improved cookstove in Cameroon. Photo courtesy of Trees for the Future/Flickr.In a finding that confirms the devastating health impact of energy poverty, the landmark Global Burden of Disease study published today tallied 3.5 million annual deaths from respiratory illness due to burning of wood, brush, dung, and other biomass for fuel.The Global Burden of Disease Study (GBD) is the most comprehensive worldwide observational epidemiological study to date. It describes mortality and morbidity from major diseases, injuries and risk factors to health at global, national and regional levels. Examining trends from 1990 to the present and making comparisons across populations enables understanding of the changing health challenges facing people across the world in the 21st century.]Cooking on traditional cookstoves is a far greater risk factor than poor water and sanitation, lead or radon pollution, or smog (ozone) and outdoor soot, according to the study in today’s Lancet, the largest ever systematic effort to describe the global distribution and causes of mortality. The data indicate that respiratory illness from breathing the emissions from inefficient cookstoves causes more than double the annual deaths attributed either to malaria (1.2 million) or to HIV/AIDS (1.5 million).Seven research institutions from around the world, including Harvard University, Johns Hopkins University, Imperial College London, the University of Tokyo, and the World Health Organization (WHO), collaborated on the study, which was funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. (Related: “How Healthy is the World?”) The research was much expanded in scope from the 1990 Global Burden of Disease study funded by the World Bank.The new study, if compared to the figures from 20 years ago, marks a decline in global deaths due to cookstove pollution (which stood at 4.6 million in the 1990 study.) But it is roughly double the 2 million annual figure that WHO has been attributing to deaths due to indoor smoke from solid fuels.“These results provide further momentum to our mission to ensure that cooking doesn’t kill,” said Radha Muthiah, executive director of the Global Alliance for Clean Cookstoves, a public-private partnership that has been working to deploy cleaner, safer cookstoves.Added Kirk R. Smith, a professor of global environmental health at the University of California, Berkeley, and a co-author of The Lancet article, “One of the most alarming findings is that smoke from cooking fires was found to be the largest environmental threat to health in the world today.”The most harmful environmental impact killing at least 4 million annually is often ignored and is relevant to future tragedy of advancing and following the unfounded theory of climate change. The alarmism carbon reduction targets implemented by the Paris Accord aimed at ending the use of cheap coal and other effective fossil fuels for electricity if followed will cause horrendous health harm to the underdeveloped living in the dark in Africa, India and Asia and more.COOKING OUTDOORS WITH HIGHLY POLLUTING SOLID FUELSHousehold air pollution and health8 May 2018العربيةKey - Around 3 billion people cook using polluting open fires or simpl stovefuelled by kerosene, biomass (wood, animal dung and crop waste) and coal.·Each year, close to 4 million people die prematurely from illness attributable to household air pollution from inefficient cooking practices using polluting stoves paired with solid fuels and kerosene.·Household air pollution causes noncommunicable diseases including stroke, ischaemic heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and lung cancer.·Close to half of deaths due to pneumonia among children under 5 years of age are caused by particulate matter (soot) inhaled from household air pollution.Indoor air pollution and household energy: the forgotten 3 billionAround 3 billion people still cook using solid fuels (such as wood, crop wastes, charcoal, coal and dung) and kerosene in open fires and inefficient stoves. Most of these people are poor, and live in low- and middle-income countries.These cooking practices are inefficient, and use fuels and technologies that produce high levels of household air pollution with a range of health-damaging pollutants, including small soot particles that penetrate deep into the lungs. In poorly ventilated dwellings, indoor smoke can be 100 times higher than acceptable levels for fine particles. Exposure is particularly high among women and young children, who spend the most time near the domestic hearth.Impacts on health3.8 million people a year die prematurely from illness attributable to the household air pollution caused by the inefficient use of solid fuels and kerosene for cooking. Among these 3.8 million deaths:·27% are due to pneumonia·18% from stroke·27% from ischaemic heart disease·20% from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)·8% from lung cancer.PneumoniaExposure to household air pollution almost doubles the risk for childhood pneumonia and is responsible for 45% of all pneumonia deaths in children less than 5 years old. Household air pollution is also risk for acute lower respiratory infections (pneumonia) in adults, and contributes to 28% of all adult deaths to pneumonia.Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseOne in four or 25% of deaths from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in adults in low- and middle-income countries are due to exposure to household air pollution. Women exposed to high levels of indoor smoke are more than twice as likely to suffer from COPD than women who use cleaner fuels and technologies. Among men (who already have a heightened risk of COPD due to their higher rates of smoking), exposure to household air pollution nearly doubles that risk.Stroke12% of all deaths due to stroke can be attributed to the daily exposure to household air pollution arising from cooking with solid fuels and kerosene.Ischaemic heart diseaseApproximately 11% of all deaths due to ischaemic heart disease, accounting for over a million premature deaths annually, can be attributed to exposure to household air pollution.Lung cancerApproximately 17% of lung cancer deaths in adults are attributable to exposure to carcinogens from household air pollution caused by cooking with kerosene or solid fuels like wood, charcoal or coal. The risk for women is higher, due to their role in food preparation.Other health impacts and risksMore generally, small particulate matter and other pollutants in indoor smoke inflame the airways and lungs, impairing immune response and reducing the oxygen-carrying capacity of the blood.There is also evidence of links between household air pollution and low birth weight, tuberculosis, cataract, nasopharyngeal and laryngeal cancers.Mortality from ischaemic heart disease and stroke are also affected by risk factors such as high blood pressure, unhealthy diet, lack of physical activity and smoking. Some other risks for childhood pneumonia include suboptimal breastfeeding, underweight and second-hand smoke. For lung cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, active smoking and second-hand tobacco smoke are also main risk factors.Impacts on health equity, development and climate changeWithout a substantial policy change, the total number of people lacking access to clean fuels and technologies will remain largely unchanged by 2030 (International Energy Agency, 2017 (1)) and therefore hinder the achievement of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.·Fuel gathering increases the risk of musculoskeletal damage, consumes considerable time for women and children, limits other productive activities (such as income generation) and takes children away from school. In less secure environments, women and children are at risk of injury and violence during fuel gathering.·Black carbon (sooty particles) and methane emitted by inefficient stove combustion are powerful climate change pollutants.·Many of the fuels and technologies used by households for cooking, heating and lighting present safety risks. The ingestion of kerosene is the leading cause of childhood poisonings, and a large fraction of the severe burns and injuries occurring in low- and middle-income countries are linked to household energy use for cooking, heating and/or lighting.·The lack of access to electricity for 1 billion people (many of whom then use kerosene lamps for lighting) exposes households to very high levels of fine particulate matter. The use of polluting lighting fuels introduces other health risks, such as burns, injuries, poisonings, and constrains other opportunities for health and development, like studying or engaging in small crafts and trades, which require adequate lighting.WHO responseWHO provides technical support to countries in their own evaluations and scale-up of health-promoting household fuels and technologies. WHO is building capacity at the country and regional level to address household air pollution through direct consultations and workshops on household energy and health. This is further complemented by the ongoing development of the Clean Household Energy Solutions Toolkit (CHEST) to support the implementation of WHO Guidelines for indoor air quality: household fuel combustion. CHEST is a suite of tools and information resources that help countries identify stakeholders working on household energy and/or public health to design, implement and monitor policies addressing household energy.Guidelines for indoor air quality: household fuel combustionTo ensure healthy air in and around the home, WHO’s Guidelines for indoor air quality: household fuel combustion provide health-based recommendations on the types of fuels and technologies to protect health as well as strategies for the effective dissemination and adoption of such home energy technologies. These build upon existing WHO outdoor air quality guidelines and WHO guidance on levels of specific indoor pollutants.Household energy databaseThe WHO Household energy database is used to monitor global progress in the transition to cleaner fuels and stove combinations in households. It also supports assessments of disease burden from the household air pollution generated from the use of polluting fuel and technologies. Currently the database includes housing data from more than 1100 surveys, representing 157 countries. It has been expanded to include information on household fuels and technologies used for heating and lighting.As the custodial agency for Sustainable Development Goal Indicator 3.9.1 (mortality rate from the joint effects of household and ambient air pollution) and 7.1.2 (population with primary reliance on clean fuels and technologies), WHO uses the Household energy database to derive estimates for tracking progress towards achieving universal clean energy access and related health impacts.Research and programme evaluationWHO is working with countries, researchers and other partners to harmonize methods of evaluation across settings so that health impacts are assessed consistently and rigorously and incorporate economic assessment of health benefits.Leadership and advocacy in the health, energy and climate communityHealth sectorIn May 2015, the World Health Assembly unanimously adopted a resolution on air pollution and health, calling for the integration of health concerns into national, regional and local air pollution-related policies. The following year, the World Health Assembly adopted a “Roadmap for Enhanced Action,” calling for increased cross-sector cooperation to address the health risks of air pollution.Building on this mandate, WHO is working to integrate guidance and resources for supporting clean household energy into global health initiatives and decision-support tools, such as the Global Action Plan for Pneumonia and Diarrheal Disease (GAPPD), or Global Strategy for Women and Children’s Health, as well as into other aspects of WHO's own health policy guidance. WHO emphasizes the compelling health arguments for cleaner household energy in a range of global forums addressing maternal and child health issues related to pneumonia as well as forums concerned with noncommunicable diseases. This advocacy can help increase awareness of the importance of providing and scaling up of cleaner household energy as a core preventive public health measure.WHO also supports international initiatives to improve air pollution and related health impacts such as the Global Alliance for Clean Cookstoves and the Climate Clean Air Coalition.(1) WEO-2017 Special Report: Energy Access Outlook, International Energy Agency, 2017 (WEO-2017 Special Report: Energy Access Outlook)Household air pollution and healthIt’s Not About the ClimateThe Great Progressive Reversal: Part OneSocial justice was once synonymous with equal access to modern amenities — electric lighting so poor children could read at night, refrigerators so milk could be kept on hand, and washing machines to save the hands and backs of women. But today's leading left-wing leaders, such as 350.org: A global campaign to confront the climate crisis's Naomi Klein (above right), advocate a return to energy penury and harmonizing human civilization to Nature.April 29, 2013 | Michael Shellenberger & Ted NordhausOver the last few decades, humans achieved one of the most remarkable victories for social justice in the history of the species. The percentage of people who live in extreme poverty — under $1.25 per day — was halved between 1990 and 2010. Average life expectancy globally rose from 56 to 68 years since 1970. And hundreds of millions of desperately poor people went from burning dung and wood for fuel (whose smoke takes two million souls a year) to using electricity, allowing them to enjoy refrigerators, washing machines, and smoke-free stoves.Of course, all of this new development puts big pressures on the environment. While the transition from wood to coal is overwhelmingly positive for forests, coal-burning is now a major contributor to global warming. The challenge for the4twenty-first century is thus to triple global energy demand, so that the world's poorest can enjoy modern living standards, while reducing our carbon emissions from energy production to zero.For the last 20 years, most everyone who cared about global warming hoped for a binding international treaty abroad, and some combination of carbon pricing, pollution regulations, and renewable energy mandates at home. That approach is now in ruins. In 2010, UN negotiations failed to create a successor to the failed Kyoto treaty. A few months later cap and trade died in the Senate. And two weeks ago, the slow motion collapse of the European Emissions Trading Scheme reached its nadir, with carbon prices, already at historic lows, collapsing after EU leaders refused to tighten the cap on emissions.What rushed into the vacuum was "climate justice," a movement headed by left-leaning groups like 350.org: A global campaign to confront the climate crisis, the Sierra Club, and Greenpeace. These groups invoke the vulnerability of the poor to climate change, but elide the reality that more energy makes them more resilient. "Huge swaths of the world have been developing over the last three decades at an unprecedented pace and scale," writes political scientist Christopher Foreman in "On Justice Movements," a new article for Breakthrough Journal. "Contemporary demands for climate justice have been, at best, indifferent to these rather remarkable developments and, at worst, openly hostile."For the climate justice movement, global warming is not to be dealt with by switching to cleaner forms of energy, but rather by returning to a pastoral, renewable-powered, and low-energy society. "Real climate solutions," writes Klein, "are ones that steer these interventions to systematically disperse and devolve power and control to the community level, whether through community-controlled renewable energy, local organic agriculture, or transit systems5genuinely accountable to their users..."Climate change can only be solved by "fixing everything," says McKibben, from how we eat, travel, produce, reproduce, consume, and live. “It’s not an engineering problem," McKibben argued recently in Rolling Stone. "It's a greed problem." Fixing it will require a "new civilizational paradigm," says Klein, "grounded not in dominance over nature, but in respect for natural cycles of renewal."Climate skeptics are right, Klein cheerily concludes: the Left is using climate change to advance policies they have long wanted. "In short," says Klein, "climate change supercharges the pre-existing case for virtually every progressive demand on the books, binding them into a coherent agenda based on a clear scientific imperative."As such, global warming is our most wicked problem. The end of our world is heralded by ideologues with specific solutions already in mind: de-growth, rural living, low- energy consumption, and renewable energies that will supposedly harmonize us with Nature. The response from the Right was all-too predictable. If climate change "supercharges the pre-existing case for virtually every progressive demand," as conservatives decided long ago, then climate change is either not happening or is not much to worry about.Wicked problems can only be solved if the ideological discourses that give rise to them are disrupted, and that's what political scientist Foreman does brilliantly in "On Justice Movements." If climate justice activists truly cared about poverty and climate change, Foreman notes, they would advocate things like better cook stoves and helping poor nations accelerate the transition from dirtier to cleaner fuels. Instead they make demands that range from the preposterous (eg, de-growth) to the picayune (eg, organic farming).Once upon a time, social justice was synonymous with equal6access to modern amenities — electric lighting so poor children could read at night, refrigerators so milk could be kept on hand, and washing machines to save the hands and backs of women. Malthus was rightly denounced by generations of socialists as a cruel aristocrat who cloaked his elitism in pseudo-science, and claimed that Nature couldn't possibly feed any more hungry months.Now, at the very moment modern energy arrives for global poor — something a prior generation of socialists would have celebrated and, indeed, demanded — today's leading left- wing leaders advocate a return to energy penury. The loudest advocates of cheap energy for the poor are on the libertarian Right, while The Nation dresses up neo-Malthusianism as revolutionary socialism.Left-wing politics was once about destabilizing power relations between the West and the Rest. Now, under the sign of climate justice, it's about sustaining them. http://thebreakthrough.org/index.php/voices/michael- shellenberger-and-ted-nordhaus/its-not-about-the-climateCHEAP PLENTIFUL COAL FOR NEW GRID ELECTRICITY IS THE ONLY REALISTIC RESPONSE TO THIS DEADLY ENVIRONMENTAL TRAGEDY.What follows is a summary of the key WHO sponsored research into household air pollution.Millions Dead: How Do We Know and What Does It Mean? Methods Used in the Comparative Risk Assessment of Household Air PollutionWhy the world’s third-largest economy is still betting on coal?Two reasons: little concern that CO2 is a problem and evidence is renewables make electricity too expensive.Image Source: Pereira et al., 2019Over 440 Scientific Papers Published In 2019 Support A Skeptical Position On Climate AlarmJapan is pushing ahead with a fuel source that’s exacerbating climate change.By Umair Irfan Feb 18, 2020, 11:30am EST….The Japanese government is more worried about the economy than the environmentThe government publicly proclaims its concerns about the environment and its green bona fides, but Japan’s powerful Ministry of Economy, Trade, and Industry (METI) is a key player in decisions about the country’s energy, and it prioritizes reliable and cheap power over low emissions. Japanese Prime Minister Abe Shinzo has also leveraged the ministry to advance his agenda to boost Japan’s economic growth, directly intervening in sectors like energy.METI has long complained that Japan pays some of the highest energy costs in the world and has been searching for a reliable and low-cost source of electricity.Japan has some of the highest electricity prices in the world. METIThat’s because Japan depends on exports and still has a lot of heavy industry that’s facing stiffer competition from competitors like China. Those high energy prices increase the prices of Japan’s exports. Add to that slowing economic growth and debt that is more than double Japan’s total economic output, and you have a government facing crushing pressure to lower costs and increase business.Right now, parts of Japan are betting heavily on renewable energy. Fukushima prefecture, where the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant is located, is trying to distance itself from nuclear, aiming to be powered 100 percent by renewables by 2040. Renewables currently provide 40 percent of the prefecture’s electricity.But across Japan as a whole, solar, wind, geothermal, and hydropower generation provide just 17 percent of the country’s electricity. As a densely populated island country, Japan has run into land use constraints around deploying large-scale wind and solar plants. Power market rules have also kept solar and wind prices high in Japan, though METI has recently taken steps to relax these regulations to help lower clean energy costs.Over the long term, the government remains skeptical that renewables can meet Japan’s economic and climate goals at the same time.“The current situation is that for renewable energy with fluctuating output such as solar power and wind power, etc. adjustments using demand control, pumping, thermal power, etc. are necessary, and complete decarbonization is difficult using these methods alone,” according to METI’s 2018 strategic energy plan. “They become more useful when combined with electricity storage and hydrogen, but there are the issues of the increase compared to overseas of the power generation cost and the power grid constraints, etc.”That pretty much leaves nuclear as Japan’s remaining option for carbon-free electricity. But the public is resolutely against it. “Nuclear has a pretty bad reputation in Japan,” said Scott Harold, a senior political scientist at the RAND Corporation.With nuclear largely off the table and skepticism around renewables, Japanese officials have increasingly turned to natural gas and coal, over the objections of environmentalists and locals in many of the communities where new plants are planned.Environmental activists see this as a decision motivated more by saving money than trying to improve energy reliability. “It is true that renewable is still more expensive than coal, and coal is one of the cheapest options in Japan, but it is also true that without building new coal power, we have no problem in electricity supply in Japan regardless [of the] nuclear shutdown,” said Hirata. In fact, some coal power projects were canceled due to lack of energy demand, as well as pressure from customers to use cleaner energy and tougher environmental regulations.The rise of China threatens Japan, and so it wants to use coal to solidify and expand its influenceBehind India and China, Japan is the world’s third-largest coal importer. About two-thirds of Japan’s coal is from Australia, a country that is also facing climate-linked disasters and is struggling to curb its economic reliance on coal.But Japan is also a major exporter of coal technology, and its government has used these power plants as a means to exert soft power. Through government institutions like the Japan Bank for International Cooperation, the government has financed new coal power plants in countries like Vietnam, Indonesia, and Bangladesh.Japan’s government has argued that these coal plants use ultra-supercritical boilers that are vastly more energy-efficient and pollute less per unit of energy. But these plants still emit greenhouse gases and are a nonstarter for activists who want the world to zero out carbon emissions.At the same time, China is financing coal plants in many of these same countries. China is using coal power financing as a key element of its Belt and Road Initiative to expand its economic and political influence throughout Asia and Africa. Both Japan and China are now racing to secure lucrative construction contracts in developing countries to expand their strategic reach.Japan is one of the largest financiers of coal power in the world, behind China. Natural Resources Defense CouncilMeanwhile, Japan has a rising rivalry with another growing regional power, South Korea. Seoul has made nuclear power a key plant of its export strategy and is also targeting many of the same markets as Japan, like Vietnam, Indonesia, and Thailand.However, Japan’s coal exports are eroding its international standing. At the December United Nations climate meeting in Madrid, Japanese Environment Minister Shinjiro Koizumi received a frosty reception as Japan arrived with no new commitments to curb its emissions and no indication that it would curb its financing of coal plants in other countries.Why the world’s third-largest economy is still betting on coalThe claim of global warming was based on computer models that showed dramatic increases in temperature and the end of snow. These models have been repudiated for failure to hind cast or predict the real climate. They are like fairy tales or dreams. Therefore the models “are not remotely plausible as policy tools” , in that “they …exaggerate the effect of greenhouse gases such as CO2” and “ignore the fact that enriching the atmosphere with CO2 is beneficial.”Ref. EUROPEAN CLIMATE DECLARATION[The intent of my answer is to show that the UN and alarmist computer models have failed miserably to simulate the climate and in reality global temperatures have not increased more than is expected from natural variability.]A few months ago 500 leading European scientists issued a declaration that there is no climate emergency because temperature increases are natural not unprecedented.The most glaring mistake of alarmist science is failure to take the long view essential for climate understanding. Weather changes in the short view of a few decades only will give a false signal, therefore this data is no more helpful than noise.This chart with a longer view > 300 years shows the oscillations of temperature have not changed much at all and this demolishes the fear of any anthropogenic global warming.Indeed spreading the data out more shows a clear decline in temperatures over the past 6000 years. This view makes sense as we are in the Quaternary ice age today evidenced by both poles iced over during the summers. There will be swings in temperature for decades or even centuries but with more than thousands of years of data temperature reality unfolds.Italian petition90 leading Italian Scientists have just issued a petition with details confirming no climate crisis from human industrialization and exposing the computer modeling errors of alarmists that deny the dominant role of the sun in the climate and natural variability. The petition says -Climate simulation models do not reproduce the observed natural variability of the climate and, in particular, do not reconstruct the warm periods of the last 10,000 years. These were repeated about every thousand years and include the well-known Medieval Warm Period , the Hot Roman Period, and generally warm periods during the Optimal Holocene period.These PERIODS OF THE PAST HAVE ALSO BEEN WARMER THAN THE PRESENT PERIOD, despite the CO2 concentration being lower than the current, while they are related to the millennial cycles of solar activity. These effects are not reproduced by the models.The full terms of the Italian petition follows -90 Leading Italian Scientists Sign Petition: CO2 Impact On Climate “UNJUSTIFIABLY EXAGGERATED” … Catastrophic Predictions “NOT REALISTIC”In 1517, a 33-year-old theology professor at Wittenberg University walked over to the Castle Church in Wittenberg and nailed a paper of 95 theses to the door, hoping to spark an academic discussion about their contents. Source. The same is happening today in Italy concerning climate science as dogma.90 Italian scientists sign petition addressed to Italian leadersTo the President of the RepublicTo the President of the SenateTo the President of the Chamber of DeputiesTo the President of the CouncilPETITION ON GLOBAL ANTHROPGENIC HEATING (Anthropogenic Global Warming, human-caused global warming)The undersigned, citizens and scientists, send a warm invitation to political leaders to adopt environmental protection policies consistent with scientific knowledge.In particular, it is urgent to combat pollution where it occurs, according to the indications of the best science. In this regard, the delay with which the wealth of knowledge made available by the world of research is used to reduce the anthropogenic pollutant emissions widely present in both continental and marine environmental systems is deplorable.But we must be aware that CARBON DIOXIDE IS ITSELF NOT A POLLUTANT. On the contrary, it is indispensable for life on our planet.In recent decades, a thesis has spread that the heating of the Earth’s surface of around 0.9°C observed from 1850 onwards would be anomalous and caused exclusively by human activities, in particular by the emission of CO2 from the use of fossil fuels in the atmosphere.This is the thesis of anthropogenic global warming [Anthropogenic Global Warming] promoted by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) of the United Nations, whose consequences would be environmental changes so serious as to fear enormous damage in an imminent future, unless drastic and costly mitigation measures are immediately adopted.In this regard, many nations of the world have joined programs to reduce carbon dioxide emissions and are pressured by a intense propaganda to adopt increasingly burdensome programs whose implementation involves heavy burdens on the economies of the individual member states and depend on climate control and, therefore, the “rescue” of the planet.However, the anthropogenic origin of global warming IS AN UNPROVEN HYPOTHESIS, deduced only from some climate models, that is complex computer programs, called General Circulation Models .On the contrary, the scientific literature has increasingly highlighted the existence of a natural climatic variability that the models are not able to reproduce.This natural variability explains a substantial part of global warming observed since 1850.The anthropogenic responsibility for climate change observed in the last century is therefore UNJUSTIFIABLY EXAGGERATED and catastrophic predictions ARE NOT REALISTIC.The climate is the most complex system on our planet, so it needs to be addressed with methods that are adequate and consistent with its level of complexity.Climate simulation models do not reproduce the observed natural variability of the climate and, in particular, do not reconstruct the warm periods of the last 10,000 years. These were repeated about every thousand years and include the well-known Medieval Warm Period , the Hot Roman Period, and generally warm periods during the Optimal Holocene period.These PERIODS OF THE PAST HAVE ALSO BEEN WARMER THAN THE PRESENT PERIOD, despite the CO2 concentration being lower than the current, while they are related to the millennial cycles of solar activity. These effects are not reproduced by the models.It should be remembered that the heating observed since 1900 has actually started in the 1700s, i.e. at the minimum of the Little Ice Age , the coldest period of the last 10,000 years (corresponding to the millennial minimum of solar activity that astrophysicists call Maunder Minimal Solar ). Since then, solar activity, following its millennial cycle, has increased by heating the earth’s surface.Furthermore, the models fail to reproduce the known climatic oscillations of about 60 years.These were responsible, for example, for a warming period (1850-1880) followed by a cooling period (1880-1910), a heating (1910-40), a cooling (1940-70) and a a new warming period (1970-2000) similar to that observed 60 years earlier.The following years (2000-2019) saw the increase not predicted by the models of about 0.2 ° C [two one-hundredths of a degree]per decade, but a substantial climatic stability that was sporadically interrupted by the rapid natural oscillations of the equatorial Pacific ocean, known as the El Nino Southern Oscillations , like the one that led to temporary warming between 2015 and 2016.The media also claim that extreme events, such as hurricanes and cyclones, have increased alarmingly. Conversely, these events, like many climate systems, have been modulated since the aforementioned 60-year cycle.For example, if we consider the official data from 1880 on tropical Atlantic cyclones that hit North America, they appear to have a strong 60-year oscillation, correlated with the Atlantic Ocean’s thermal oscillation called Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation .The peaks observed per decade are compatible with each other in the years 1880-90, 1940-50 and 1995-2005. From 2005 to 2015 the number of cyclones decreased precisely following the aforementioned cycle. Thus, in the period 1880-2015, between number of cyclones (which oscillates) and CO2 (which increases monotonically) there is no correlation.The climate system is not yet sufficiently understood. Although it is true that CO2 is a greenhouse gas, according to the IPCC itself the climate sensitivity to its increase in the atmosphere is still extremely uncertain.It is estimated that a doubling of the concentration of atmospheric CO2, from around 300 ppm pre-industrial to 600 ppm, can raise the average temperature of the planet from a minimum of 1° C to a maximum of 5° C.This uncertainty is enormous.In any case, many recent studies based on experimental data estimate that the climate sensitivity to CO2 is CONSIDERABLY LOWER than that estimated by the IPCC models.Then, it is scientifically unrealistic to attribute to humans the responsibility for warming observed from the past century to today. The advanced alarmist forecasts, therefore, are not credible, since they are based on models whose results contradict the experimental data.All the evidence suggests that these MODELS OVERESTIMATE the anthropogenic contribution and underestimate the natural climatic variability, especially that induced by the sun, the moon, and ocean oscillations.Finally, the media release the message according to which, with regard to the human cause of current climate change, there would be an almost unanimous consensus among scientists that the scientific debate would be closed.However, first of all we must be aware that the scientific method dictates that the facts, and not the number of adherents, make a conjecture a consolidated scientific theory .In any case, the same alleged consensus DOES NOT EXIST. In fact, there is a remarkable variability of opinions among specialists – climatologists, meteorologists, geologists, geophysicists, astrophysicists – many of whom recognize an important natural contribution to global warming observed from the pre-industrial period and even from the post-war period to today.There have also been petitions signed by thousands of scientists who have expressed dissent with the conjecture of anthropogenic global warming.These include the one promoted in 2007 by the physicist F. Seitz, former president of the American National Academy of Sciences, and the one promoted by the Non-governmental International Panel on Climate Change (NIPCC), whose 2009 report concludes that “Nature, not the activity of Man governs the climate”.In conclusion, given the CRUCIAL IMPORTANCE THAT FOSSIL FUELS have for the energy supply of humanity, we suggest that they should not adhere to policies of uncritically reducing carbon dioxide emissions into the atmosphere with THE ILLUSORY PRETENSE OF CONTROLLING THE CLIMATE.http://www.opinione.it/…/redazione_riscaldamento-globale-…/…PROMOTING COMMITTEE: