Police General Order Template: Fill & Download for Free

I am now almost completely convinced that the situation in Xinjiang is analogous with Northern Ireland - although on a vastly larger scale - in the 1980’s. A difficult security situation characterized by dense security and intermittent examples of local over reach. So some of the horror stories are probably going to be true. Just like the horror stories of atrocities in Iraq and Afghanistan and in Northern Ireland itself.However, many countries have been through similar situations and handled them far worse than the approach of containment and economic uplift that China appears to be taking in Xinjiang.We need to get a grip and put what is happening in context. China has elected to implement a local mandatory educational conscription to deal with a serious terrorist threat that has been ongoing for about 5 or 6 years. As usual, it’s at a scale that leaves the west gasping; entire new facilities springing up out of the flat earth - we saw the same thing with bespoke covid-19 hospitals - within weeks and months. However, there is almost certainly no genocide. Villages and cities are not being bombed and hundreds of thousands of people have not been killed. The breathlessly promoted “before and after” satellite photos show educational facilities not concentration camps. As far as outcomes go, China is already light years ahead of every response the US has taken to a threat in the last 50 years. Think Korea, Vietnam, Iraq or the “war” on drugs.Am I thrilled about it? No. Does it sound repressive? Absolutely. But it isn’t my country and I am not convinced - especially given that the loudest voices promoting this narrative lack all credibility - that this rises to the level of human rights violations. Not even technically. I also don’t have suggestions about how they should proceed because from Iraq to Afghanistan to Libya to Chechnya I’m not seeing the US or European (here I mean the member states not the EU - the EU has no army) responses to these situations as a particularly helpful template.Could I be horrifically wrong? Maybe, But my common sense is screaming at me - that in a world flooded with Wi-Fi and smart phones and not so much as 15 fucking seconds of convincing footage of the “camps” - that I’m not.I am increasingly persuaded that the steady trickle of stories about rape, murder and abuse are produced to serve the predictable function of robbing people of their common sense and bouncing the general public into a foaming outrage. We really need to ask ourselves - especially given the very thin evidence base - who does this serve? I think we all know the answer to that question and they have pulled this before.There's an old saying in Tennessee—I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee—that says, 'Fool me once, shame on...shame on you. Fool me—you can't get fooled again.President George W. Bush.In the meantime, we have plenty to worry about at home. Until the US get’s its own horrific unchecked-capitalist-hell-scape-enforced-with-impunity-by-murderous-racist-police in order and we begin to roll-back the same relentless privatizing rot that has been steadily infecting the EU for decades, how about we concentrate on that? How about we worry about the resurgent threat of fascism - the perpetual Achilles heel of democracies - in the US, the UK and multiple EU member states and let China manage their own affairs?What this is almost certainly about is geopolitics. The same reason for all the whining about Chinese “theft” and technology transfer - Jesus Christ - they laid the foundations of the modern world: paper, gunpowder, printing, the compass. We took all that stuff and then fucked them for 200 years. Maybe we owe them? Besides, if it’s so terrible, why do we keep trading with them? You know the answer to that - because it’s still worth it.So no actions will flow from this because you can’t stop a genocide that isn’t happening and China is a valuable trading partner that no one can afford to ditch on the basis of fiction.

The “United States” by which we mean the settler-colonial nation-state that controls the political-economy of a large portion of North America would not exist if libertarian socialists succeeded. We are necessarily state-abolitionists and anti-nationalists.Instead, what you’d have are various overlapping industrial, cultural, and geographical federative associations.It is hard to predict what these associations would look like exactly or precisely, given that they would be based on concrete social connections and not abstracted forms, but in order to be genuinely “libertarian-socialist” they’d have to have some bare minimum qualities.Rather than be constructed according to some hierarchical or authoritarian principle they’d be the product of a (or a multiplicity of) free associations of working people(s.)These associations likely would be federated from the bottom up — a merging of most local to least local. The federative form as opposed to the unitary form is conductive toward and instills the basis of free-association.All associated industry would be controlled by those who produce in it, and the management of the means of associated production would be placed in collective institutions of various social bond strengths. Some of these associations might be loose and flexible, others very rigid and tight. Some would be short-lived, and others longer-lived. It depends considerably on the minutia of the association and its intended goals.Capitalism would have been fully abolished. No longer would the profit-motive and private ownership of the means of associated production dominate production and distribution. Labor would become free from commodification.Incentives of production would instead be to generally reduce costs and increase the well-being of oneself and those with which one is socially entangled or embedded, as well as to self-create and self-reflect via individualized and associated creativity.Indigenous people would have total freedom to manage their own affairs.African diaspora would have total freedom to manage their own affairs.Police would have been abolished with capitalism and the state — those institutions which demand police to exist in order to protect their exploitation of the working population.Certain regions and non-regional associations of this former United States might become fully anarchic (choose to organize without legal order or apriori abstracted templates) while others might support local and federative democratic government and law (see: Communalism, Libertarian Marxism.) There might be political-economic conflict between anarchist and radical-democratic libertarian-socialists when it comes to accepting some legal or democratic authority — with consistent anarchists opposing all legal order and authority and other libertarian socialists supporting it in some contexts.

I am now almost completely convinced that the situation in Xinjiang is analogous with Northern Ireland - although on a vastly larger scale - in the 1980’s. A difficult security situation characterized by dense security and intermittent examples of local over reach. So some of the horror stories are probably going to be true. Just like the horror stories of atrocities in Iraq and Afghanistan and in Northern Ireland itself.However, many countries have been through similar situations and handled them far worse than the approach of containment and economic uplift that China appears to be taking in Xinjiang.We need to get a grip and put what is happening in context. China has elected to implement a local mandatory educational conscription to deal with a serious terrorist threat that has been ongoing for about 5 or 6 years. As usual, it’s at a scale that leaves the west gasping; entire new facilities springing up out of the flat earth - we saw the same thing with bespoke covid-19 hospitals - within weeks and months. However, there is almost certainly no genocide. Villages and cities are not being bombed and hundreds of thousands of people have not been killed. The breathlessly promoted “before and after” satellite photos show educational facilities not concentration camps. As far as outcomes go, China is already light years ahead of every response the US has taken to a threat in the last 50 years. Think Korea, Vietnam, Iraq or the “war” on drugs.Am I thrilled about it? No. Does it sound repressive? Absolutely. But it isn’t my country and I am not convinced - especially given that the loudest voices promoting this narrative lack all credibility - that this rises to the level of human rights violations. Not even technically. I also don’t have suggestions about how they should proceed because from Iraq to Afghanistan to Libya to Chechnya I’m not seeing the US or European (here I mean the member states not the EU - the EU has no army) responses to these situations as a particularly helpful template.Could I be horrifically wrong? Maybe, But my common sense is screaming at me - that in a world flooded with Wi-Fi and smart phones and not so much as 15 fucking seconds of convincing footage of the “camps” - that I’m not.I am increasingly persuaded that the steady trickle of stories about rape, murder and abuse are produced to serve the predictable function of robbing people of their common sense and bouncing the general public into a foaming outrage. We really need to ask ourselves - especially given the very thin evidence base - who does this serve? I think we all know the answer to that question and they have pulled this before.There's an old saying in Tennessee—I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee—that says, 'Fool me once, shame on...shame on you. Fool me—you can't get fooled again.President George W. Bush.In the meantime, we have plenty to worry about at home. Until the US get’s its own horrific unchecked-capitalist-hell-scape-enforced-with-impunity-by-murderous-racist-police in order and we begin to roll-back the same relentless privatizing rot that has been steadily infecting the EU for decades, how about we concentrate on that? How about we worry about the resurgent threat of fascism - the perpetual Achilles heel of democracies - in the US, the UK and multiple EU member states and let China manage their own affairs?What this is almost certainly about is geopolitics. The same reason for all the whining about Chinese “theft” and technology transfer - Jesus Christ - they laid the foundations of the modern world: paper, gunpowder, printing, the compass. We took all that stuff and then fucked them for 200 years. Maybe we owe them? Besides, if it’s so terrible, why do we keep trading with them? You know the answer to that - because it’s not happening.