Proposal By China - United Nations Office On Drugs And Crime: Fill & Download for Free

GET FORM

Download the form

How to Edit and sign Proposal By China - United Nations Office On Drugs And Crime Online

Read the following instructions to use CocoDoc to start editing and writing your Proposal By China - United Nations Office On Drugs And Crime:

  • First of all, look for the “Get Form” button and press it.
  • Wait until Proposal By China - United Nations Office On Drugs And Crime is shown.
  • Customize your document by using the toolbar on the top.
  • Download your customized form and share it as you needed.
Get Form

Download the form

An Easy Editing Tool for Modifying Proposal By China - United Nations Office On Drugs And Crime on Your Way

Open Your Proposal By China - United Nations Office On Drugs And Crime Immediately

Get Form

Download the form

How to Edit Your PDF Proposal By China - United Nations Office On Drugs And Crime Online

Editing your form online is quite effortless. You don't have to download any software via your computer or phone to use this feature. CocoDoc offers an easy tool to edit your document directly through any web browser you use. The entire interface is well-organized.

Follow the step-by-step guide below to eidt your PDF files online:

  • Find CocoDoc official website on your laptop where you have your file.
  • Seek the ‘Edit PDF Online’ option and press it.
  • Then you will visit here. Just drag and drop the PDF, or import the file through the ‘Choose File’ option.
  • Once the document is uploaded, you can edit it using the toolbar as you needed.
  • When the modification is done, press the ‘Download’ option to save the file.

How to Edit Proposal By China - United Nations Office On Drugs And Crime on Windows

Windows is the most widespread operating system. However, Windows does not contain any default application that can directly edit document. In this case, you can download CocoDoc's desktop software for Windows, which can help you to work on documents efficiently.

All you have to do is follow the guidelines below:

  • Get CocoDoc software from your Windows Store.
  • Open the software and then attach your PDF document.
  • You can also attach the PDF file from OneDrive.
  • After that, edit the document as you needed by using the diverse tools on the top.
  • Once done, you can now save the customized form to your cloud storage. You can also check more details about how do you edit a PDF file.

How to Edit Proposal By China - United Nations Office On Drugs And Crime on Mac

macOS comes with a default feature - Preview, to open PDF files. Although Mac users can view PDF files and even mark text on it, it does not support editing. By using CocoDoc, you can edit your document on Mac quickly.

Follow the effortless instructions below to start editing:

  • To get started, install CocoDoc desktop app on your Mac computer.
  • Then, attach your PDF file through the app.
  • You can attach the document from any cloud storage, such as Dropbox, Google Drive, or OneDrive.
  • Edit, fill and sign your paper by utilizing this CocoDoc tool.
  • Lastly, download the document to save it on your device.

How to Edit PDF Proposal By China - United Nations Office On Drugs And Crime via G Suite

G Suite is a widespread Google's suite of intelligent apps, which is designed to make your work faster and increase collaboration across departments. Integrating CocoDoc's PDF document editor with G Suite can help to accomplish work effectively.

Here are the guidelines to do it:

  • Open Google WorkPlace Marketplace on your laptop.
  • Seek for CocoDoc PDF Editor and download the add-on.
  • Attach the document that you want to edit and find CocoDoc PDF Editor by selecting "Open with" in Drive.
  • Edit and sign your paper using the toolbar.
  • Save the customized PDF file on your computer.

PDF Editor FAQ

Warren and Sanders won the CNN debate, but who will pay for their plans? Are you okay with much higher federal taxes?

I am okay with higher taxes.Do you know how okay I am? I moved to a country with higher taxes.And much, much higher wages.I earn three times as much as I did before and pay slightly more of a percentage of my income in taxes. For the same job. Actually, not the same job. A less skilled job requiring less experience, and not at the management level anymore either. Still coming out ahead in this deal.And what do I get in return for higher taxes? (and much higher wages, enabling me to come out ahead, so we’re already done comparing these two countries fairly, it’s already no contest which is better)The cheapest doctor’s visits I have ever seen, by an order of magnitude. That means a factor of 10 and I am not exaggerating. The cheapest operations I have ever seen, by a literal order of magnitude OR TWO.In return for a slightly higher percentage, I see a doctor anytime I need to. I get the medication I need to take every week to stay healthy. I get operations when I need them. I go to the doctor when I am sick or have an accident.Here, college tuition is free. My kids will go to college and not begin their lives 100,000 dollars in debt or more just to become a teacher. They will then earn more in their career, in most careers, than they do back in the States. And they will pay a bit more in taxes, and again, earn a lot, lot more in wages.They will never worry about their pensions vanishing if their employer goes under. They will never worry about bankruptcy due to illness or injury, or due to getting an education.They won’t worry about the solvency of the country (The government runs at a surplus because they don’t have a trillion dollar deficit by giving tax breaks to billionaires).They won’t have to worry as much about unemployment or job security in general. Norway has pretty much always had a lower unemployment rate than the USA, going back decades now. Often much, much lower.They have a higher percentage of people in the workforce as well. That’s because people both want to work and there are more jobs available per capita. We actually have to import laborers from other countries to fill all the jobs. Seasonal workers flock here for the better wages and benefits.That’s another thing, benefits. My god the benefits are great here. Even for the minimum wage folks like myself. That’s all thanks to unions, another wonderful idea that came from your friends on the center/left spectrum of economic politics.And they will grow up in a nation with a microscopic murder rate per capita, an order of magnitude smaller (even after adjusting for the population difference).A country that takes in an order of magnitude more refugees per capita than the USA, so hold your racist arguments that the country is nicer because it is full of white people. Which is always the argument. Because certain people cite Hispanics and black Americans, some of whom have been living in the territory that is now the USA for generations longer than the nation even existed, due to a thing we learned about in American schools, called slavery. Or the war with Mexico, or the annexation of Texas, for example, when it comes to Hispanics. Some of these families have lived there longer than the land was part of the USA or the USA even existed.Folks that have been in the USA for generations longer than the USA was even a thing, some of whom within my parent’s lifetime only just then got their full civil rights at long last, yeah, some of them are poorer than average and were forced to live in communities which received few tax dollars or administrative oversight. Those are called ghettos. And those things are a problem because your elected governments and policy positions created them and the problems associated with them by denying people employment and rights based on race and then flooding the area with drugs and not spending much on schools or on economic development.Black folks emigrate to Norway and Arab folks do and brown skinned folks from South America do, and have been doing so for quite some time, and they are not from here, don’t even have the advantage of already knowing the language or the culture, and come here with even less money because they’re often refugees from war torn countries or kleptocratic dictatorships. And we get 10 times more of these kinds of people per capita than the United States does.And are they a problem?My goodness, you could just look up our crime and murder rates and find out. The information is public domain. Use government data and neutral encyclopediae and you can find out. Spoiler alert: No, we are literally safer than the safest state in the USA.And I have to repeat this argument every single time I talk about Norway and leave the comments on BECAUSE THERE ALWAYS IS AT LEAST ONE PERSON who says Norway is so great because it doesn’t have as much racial diversity.Sure, that’s the problem. That’s the whole problem with America. It’s the skin color. Not your policies going back decades, particularly in the Southern states that have plenty of black folks and do whatever they can to make sure their votes represent as few congresspersons as possible. AKA gerrymandering and voter ID laws, or poll taxes in the past.Sure, it’s all their fault. Good job. It was the skin color all along, wow, you’re right.The black folks and Arabs here in Norway would like a word with you. But they can probably say it to you in about five languages at this point. You have to learn a lot of languages growing up in places like that, and then moving to a well run country like Norway, where you probably should know both English and Norwegian.Or how about this one: Norway is doing so well because they produce oil.Sure, and the USA doesn’t produce anything. Doesn’t have any corporations that span the globe, any intellectual property or consumer culture spanning the globe, they don’t produce a ton of oil and coal and timber and export agricultural products, certainly no software being developed, no TV shows, no movies, no books, no music, no natural resources. In fact, last I heard, the USA was dirt poor, contained no billionaires, and wasn’t the single largest economy on Earth but also contained a population with shit wages and millions of working class people had no healthcare at all.It’s because America is the greatest country on Earth, until you compare it to other countries and have to start making excuses.Canada can have a healthcare plan, but that won’t work in America because Canada produces what, Maple syrup and timber, so they have an advantage? Poor USA can’t keep up with Canada? Not a fair comparison? Can’t keep up with Australia either, or the United Kingdom, or Germany, or Norway, Sweden, Denmark, or Finland? By the way, Sweden doesn’t produce oil, so what’s your excuse there?God I get so tired of the excuses, coming out of the same mouths that brag about how America is the greatest and best country that they are so proud of and can do anything it wants, except basic services provided in every single other society in the free world.That stuff is out of the question. A living wage? We can’t do it, the economy will collapse. Equal pay for women? Out of the question, America will never be able to compete…. with the countries that already pay women equally. Overtime laws that get enforced? Labor laws that get enforced? Unions that have negotiated guaranteed wage increases when the cost of living increases? Can’t do that, our economy might actually look like Norway’s and not suffer an economic downturn at the end of every Republican presidential administration in my lifetime, and plunge millions of homeowners into financial ruin, and put countless millions more into under-employment if not unemployment. College education and healthcare? No way.Tax cuts for billionaires, and running a trillion dollar deficit while the economy is supposedly strong? Of course.But basic services for our working class and seniors and our young people who want an education and our sick who need healthcare, out of the question.It’s only been done in every other advanced free democracy in existence to great effect and with a more stable economy, more prosperous working class, with a population added up that dwarfs that of the USA several times over, but you see, in the USA, math works differently and facts have a left wing bias, so it can’t be done there.That’s what I always hear. How awful and horrible and dystopian the results of their ideas will be.Then, I look at places on Earth whose governments run with those policies.Places like Canada, where Americans have to flock for cheaper drugs and insulin, and sometimes have to frigging move just to get healthcare.It’s like when poor folks have to move out of Republican states and go to Democratic ones just to get basic services and jobs, because you can find those in Democratic states and Democratic stronghold cities, not in Trump country.I look at places like Australia and the UK and most if not all of Europe. But most of all, I look at places like Norway, places that go further and farther than Sanders and Warren even propose. And they do just fine.And I look at the states in the USA that have been voting Republican since Ronald Reagan and I look at their healthcare and crime and joblessness and wages, and I don’t see good numbers there.The results of the experiment of democracy are in. Since Ronald Reagan, drugs and crime have become a serious problem in the USA, and it has only gotten worse and worse. Our prisons are full and our paychecks are thin, if we have them at all. Corporate profits have never been better, and they sure got their bailouts when the economic downturn happened. Republicans and Democrats alike agreed that Wall Street was too big to fail after gambling with our pensions and mortgages. And they both agreed that well, the best way to increase wages for working Americans was to give billionaires a tax break while we were fighting 2 public wars and several private ones.Followed by another tax break, and another. Obama extended the Bush tax cuts. Trump gave them even more tax cuts. And now he’s talking about even more cuts.Fiscal conservatives like Paul Ryan signed those tax cuts into law, and created our trillion dollar a year deficit in a time when we should not need to stimulate the already rich, but do something at long last for the working class.Those fiscal conservatives talked a lot of crap about how Obama ran a deficit. A deficit that shrank every year, because the deficit was caused by the wars Bush started and the bailouts to the economy that were needed when his policies tanked the economy.A deficit that was much, much smaller and an economy which was much, much better when Trump took over, and then took credit.Then he did nothing but cause financial ruin for America’s farmers in ruby red states with his idiotic tariffs which have INCREASED the trade gap between China and the United States, because we do not stop buying Chinese products and filling Wal-Mart shelves with those products, but we do pay the tariffs. The Chinese, on the other hand, stopped buying our grain and soybeans and got them cheaper elsewhere, thanks to Trump’s tariffs. So he had to bail out our farmers to the tune of billions.Great job Trump, you’ve saved us from a slowly recovering economy and shat all over the economies of most of the states that put you in office, greatly increased our debt and yearly deficit, never followed through on your promise to deliver better healthcare, cheaper, to cover everyone, that we all knew was smoke and bullshit.You never drained the swamp, as your administration racks up more indictments than the Nixon administration. You hired crony capitalists, crooked businessmen, and your idiot in-laws and blood relatives to represent and govern the country, with more and more of them resigning in disgrace every month, pleading guilty, or, best case scenario, being fired for actually doing a service to the country and opposing your idiocy.To answer your question one more time, since I already said so at the beginning of this diatribe, yes, I will gladly pay more in taxes, if, as every other country that governs worth a damn does with those tax dollars:Covers most or all of their citizens’ medical needs, and guarantees they will never go bankrupt.Covers most or all of their citizens’ educational costs or staggers them over the course of a lifetime and guarantees no one will go bankrupt.Either the federal government or the state governments provide higher wages to accompany the always rising costs of goods and services as a result of the monetary policy set by the Fed which benefits the billionaire class and because businessmen will charge whatever consumers will pay, and over time, they will collect every dollar the poor working class person earns just by jacking up prices. So, minimum wage increases, orProtects unions and ends “right to work” and other laws which allow consequence free firing of any person at any time for any reason without covering their unemployment welfare costs. That protects the worker from employer abuse.Actually fines the ever loving shit out of companies that violate wage laws, overtime laws, employment laws, safety laws, and undocumented migrant worker laws, since those are the people who cause the entire “problem” of “losing jobs to immigrants” in the first place. If you paid every worker fairly, according to the law, or had to pay an enormous fine, my gosh, American workers would be cheaper than Mexican crop pickers. And then, you’d have to pay someone 10 dollars an hour to pick tomatoes for 8 hours a day. Oh dear, oh dear, do you know how expensive your tomatoes would be then? They might cost an extra two cents apiece. And then American workers would be getting paid living wages and qualifying for healthcare, and paying taxes to cover that healthcare.Am I okay with higher taxes?I am certainly opposed to continuing to lower taxes, lower wages, remove worker’s rights, voter’s rights, defendant’s rights, human rights, right to free assembly, speech, protest, and seeing our “President” blame the poorest among us and the least able to vote and participate in our democracy, the youngest, the lowest ranked in the corporate class, the people least represented in our government, for all of society’s problems, instead of blaming the richest class that owns the political class and the media, makes up 99 percent of all of our voting representatives in Congress, and also, blaming himself, because as President, the buck is supposed to stop at his desk.Instead, he’s busy blaming Obama almost 3 years into his own Presidency for the current status of the white house air conditioning system.The air conditioning system is not like an economy. You can fix it today, dumbass. And if it is broke, you own the problem and you also own the solution. You apparently have waited almost three years to say or do anything about a problem that was there all along. And it’s something you feel you have to bitch about publicly, is your minor discomfort sitting in the White House.Take your own advice, Trump: If you don’t like it, leave. You can always resign, and I promise you, the world will celebrate that day for the next 100 years. Or, since you’re the President and this isn’t your first week, month, or year in office, stop blaming others and DO something about it, you demented moron.

Why is the Indian Army not willing to hand over operational control of the Assam rifle to the MHA?

Answer to your question are few counter questions.When there is dispute on the Indian Borders and the enemy uses these borders to push terrorists, war like stores and counterfeit currency to destroy India despite the borders being under control of the Border Security Force, ITBP and SSB etc. Why should they not be held accountable?Why did Indian Army have to create a Paramilitary Force such as Rashtriya Rifles in J & K and North East? It was meant to be raised out of Ex Servicemen and Ex Policemen as a Paramilitary Force under MHA but eventually MHA disowned it leaving MoD to administer it. Today it is run exclusively by Indian Army by contributing Officers and Soldiers on tenures from the already deficient strength of Indian Army?Why does the MHA want the control of Assam Rifles but not Rashtriya Rifles? Answers are not easy. But here is the bitter truth. The bitter truth is the Indian Police Service ambitions and contradictions.What is Indian Police Service (IPS)?“The Indian Police Service (IPS) is one of the three All India Services constituted under Article 312 of the Constitution of India. The IPS officers provide senior level leadership to Police Forces both in the States and at the Centre. The Police Division in the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) is responsible for Cadre management of IPS and Policy Decisions such as cadre structure, recruitment, training, cadre allocation, confirmation, empanelment, deputation, pay and allowances, disciplinary matters of IPS Officers.”[1]Now read carefully. IPS is a Service. It provides Senior Level Leadership to Police Forces.A service provides senior level but not junior level leadership to police forces.What has IPS to say about its current Role?“Central IPS Association declares that “The current rules and functions of an Indian Police Service Officer are as follows:To fulfill duties based on border responsibilities, in the areas of maintenance of public peace and order, crime prevention, investigation, and detection, collection of intelligence, VIP security, counter-terrorism, border policing, railway policing, tackling smuggling, drug trafficking, economic offences, corruption in public life, disaster management, enforcement of socio-economic legislation, bio-diversity and protection of environmental laws etc.Leading and commanding the Indian Intelligence Agencies like Research and Analysis Wing (R&AW), Intelligence Bureau (IB), Central Bureau of Investigations (CBI), Criminal Investigation Department (CID) etc., Indian Federal Law Enforcement Agencies, Civil and Armed Police Forces in all the states and union territories.Leading and commanding the Central Armed Police Forces (CAPF) which include the Central Police Organisations (CPO) and Central Paramilitary Forces (CPF) such as Border Security Force (BSF), Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF), Indo-Tibetan Border Police (ITBP), National Security Guard (NSG), Central Industrial Security Force (CISF), Vigilance Organisations, Indian Federal Law Enforcement Agencies.To interact and coordinate closely with the members of other All India Services and also with the Indian Armed Forces primarily with the Indian Army.Last but not the least, to lead and command the force with courage, uprightness, dedication and a strong sense of service to the people.”[2]Does it leave anything for any other Service or Force to do anything in the matters of Security and Safety?What are Police Forces?As per MHA following are the Police Forces of India.[3]Assam Rifles (AR)Border Security Force (BSF)Central Industrial Security Force (CISF)Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF)Indo Tibetan Border Police (ITBP)National Security Guard (NSG)Sashastra Seema Bal (SSB)What is Role of Central Armed Police Forces (CAPFs)?“Under the Constitution, police and public order are state subjects. However, the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) assists state governments by providing them support of the Central Armed Police Forces. The Ministry maintains seven CAPFs: (i) the Central Reserve Police Force, which assists in internal security and counterinsurgency, (ii) the Central Industrial Security Force, which protects vital installations (like airports) and public sector undertakings, (iii) the National Security Guards, which is a special counterterrorism force, and (iv) four border guarding forces, which are the Border Security Force, Indo-Tibetan Border Police, Sashastra Seema Bal, and Assam Rifles.As of January 2017, the sanctioned strength of the seven CAPFs was 10,78,514 personnel.”[4] In comparison strength of Indian Army is 1,443,921.What is the History of Assam Rifles?“The Assam Rifles came into being in 1835, as a militia called the ‘Cachar Levy’. With approximately 750 men, this Force was formed to primarily protect British Tea estates and their settlements against tribal raids. Subsequently, all these Forces were reorganised and renamed as the ‘Frontier Force’ as their role was increased to conduct of punitive expeditions across the borders of Assam. This Force significantly contributed in opening the region to administration and commerce and over time they came to be known as the “right arm of the civil and left arm of the military”.In 1917, recognising their work during the Great War, fighting shoulder to shoulder with Rifle Regiments of the regular British Army, the name of the Force was changed to ‘Assam Rifles’.Post-Independence role of the Assam Rifles continued to evolve ranging from conventional combat role during Sino-India War 1962, operating in foreign land as part of the Indian Peace Keeping Force (IPKF) to Sri Lanka in 1987 (Op Pawan) to peacekeeping role[5] in the North-Eastern areas of India in the face of growing tribal unrest and insurgency wherein the maintenance of law and order, countering insurgency and reassuring the people of the region became important tasks for the Assam Rifles.”[6]What does Assam Rifles call itself?Fondly called ‘Friends of the North East People’, the Force is the highest awarded and decorated Para Military Force of the Republic of India.[7]What are its current Role and Tasks?“Conduct counter insurgency operations in the north-east and other areas where deemed necessary, under control of the army.During peace and ‘proxy war’, ensure security of the Indo-China and Indo-Myanmar borders. During war, rear area security in the TBA.Act as penultimate interventionist force of the central government in internal security situation, under the control of army; when the situation goes beyond the control of central paramilitary operations.”[8]Why the fight over Control between IPS and Indian Army?“The Assam Rifles, at present, has a total of 46 battalions, and most of its units are headed by Army officers since 1884. The Assam Rifles was put under complete operational control of the Army in 1965.The nearly 55,000-strong Assam Rifles has been guarding India's 1,640-km long border with Myanmar besides providing operational and logistics support to the Army in keeping a strict vigil in several key sectors along the Sino-India boundary in Arunachal Pradesh.At present, the Home Ministry has the administrative authority over the paramilitary force Assam Rifles while the Army has its operational control.The Cabinet Committee on Security (CCS), headed by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, is likely to examine the Home Ministry's proposal to merge the Assam Rifles with the Indo-Tibetan Border Police (ITBP) and bring overall operational control under it.The Army thinks shifting the operational control of the Assam Rifles to the Home Ministry will adversely impact the Army's capability to effectively guard the sensitive border with China when the neighbouring country has been enhancing its military infrastructure along the frontier, sources said. They said the Assam Rifles provides significant assistance to the Army in keeping strict surveillance over the border with China as it frees up Army units from "static defensive" role. Moreover, 70-80 per cent personnel of the Assam Rifles are deployed in conventional military roles."The Assam Rifles fills the void when Army units carry forward the battle to the enemy territory. This is the only genuine paramilitary force which actively participated in all the wars since Independence including the 1962 and 1971 wars," said a senior Army official.”[9]Current Status of the matter“The sources said concerned over the proposal by the Home Ministry to take operational control of the nearly 185 years old Assam Rifles, the Army has taken up the issue with the Defence Ministry last week seeking its immediate intervention in the matter.Strongly opposing the move, the Army has instead sought overall responsibility of guarding the entire Sino-India border in the Eastern sector to effectively deal with any Chinese transgression, top military sources told PTI.The Army has also questioned the timing of the proposal to bring the paramilitary force under the Home Ministry when the security scenario in the North Eastern region has been fragile due to the issue of National Register of Citizens (NRC). ”[10]Why should not ITBP be placed under Assam Rifles instead?Indian Army has suggested just that. Why should ITBP operate independently in the most volatile LAC region in Ladakh against China whereas relatively calm Myanmar Border is with Assam Rifles under operational control of the Army?Why doesn't the IPS provide Junior Level leadership to Assam Rifles if it wants Senior Level Leadership through ITBP?“The Indian Army alone is short of 7,298 officers, Minister of State for Defence Subhash Bhamre said in a written reply in the Lok Sabha. He said the Army has an authorised strength of 49,933 officers but as on January 1, 2018 it had only 42,635.”[11] If IPS provides Junior Level Leadership for Assam Rifles it would have the natural right to assume Senior Level Leadership too. It will help reduce shortage of Army Officers relieved from Assam Rifles as well as six other CAPFs. Parachuting into Senior Level Leadership by an All India Service in the organisations of Armed Forces whether Military or Police has no justification let alone parallel anywhere in the World.What’s the real matter?Reality is the Leadership claim at the Senior Level. IPS have arrogated the Senior Level leadership of all Police Forces to themselves. Since 1965 the Assam Rifles having been under operational control was never questioned. But recent attempts to bring it under operational control of ITBP means another turf war over Senior Level (Director General) and several ADG Level appointments that the IPS and ITBP seeks by emerging as one Border Force for China Border and LAC from Ladakh to Arunanchal Pradesh.Latest Update:Union Cabinet approves 2 Commands and Two Lt Gen Equivalent Posts at Srinagar and Guwahati for ITBP. What will he do at Guwahati is anyone's guess.ITBP to have two more commandsAnd that's ITBP for you.0:00-0:30Footnotes[1] https://ips.gov.in/[2] INDIAN POLICE SERVICE(CENTRAL) ASSOCIATION[3] Central Armed Police Forces[4] Central Police Forces: Overview and Issues[5] Welcome to Assam Rifles[6] Welcome to Assam Rifles[7] Welcome to Assam Rifles[8] Welcome to Assam Rifles[9] Giving total control of Assam Rifles to MHA will adversely impact vigil: Army to Govt[10] Giving total control of Assam Rifles to MHA will adversely impact vigil: Army to Govt[11] Indian Armed Forces short of 9,000 officers: MoS Defence Subhash Bhamre

Donald Trump: Why wouldn't you vote for Donald Trump for president?

At the point when Americans are called upon to defend their nation, not so much from remote tyrants or war or fear mongers, but from those individuals who have no intention to commit to their duty, to progress or to democracy or delegate government; who deny any responsibility for anything with the exception of their own wild and unfathomable pits that are their egos, it becomes a very serious matter.The most perilous individual ever selected by a significant gathering for the highest office is sitting in the White House wearing his Oompa Loompa suit, where his base needs scarcely any details and even fewer facts and donald trump is their immoral saviour. Following each offence, our shock and repugnance have been refracted like light through a crystal.You requested a specific list of reasons not to vote for trump. Very well, here it is.Seen all at once, it is horrifying.The Republican Party nominated a man who obnoxiously assaulted the Pope; who assaulted John McCain for being caught by the North Vietnamese; who assaulted Gold Star guardians Khizr and Ghazala Khan and afterwards compared their names with the expression "Radical Islamic Terrorism."He’s the man who assaulted Hillary Clinton, calling her a "bigot." Who labelled her as "brainwashed." As "unhinged." As "a monster." As "the devil." As "the most corrupt candidate ever" showing her face on heaps of hundred-dollar notes and the Star of David. He labelled her as somebody whom "Second Amendment people" ought to take care of. As somebody whose religion "we know nothing about," after he clarified he had never approached God for absolution.He who assaulted President Obama and inferred he was a double-crosser. Who accused him as having been complicit in the Orlando terrorist attack. Who assaulted him for having lower endorsement appraisals than Vladimir Putin, as though Putin's could be trusted; who assaulted him as being born in another nation; who assaulted him as the founder of ISIS, then at that point said it was sarcasm, then said it wasn't sarcasm, then attacked him again as the founder of ISIS.This is a “president” who assaulted the women who accused Roger Ailes of provocation; who assaulted the women who chose abortion and said there ought to be disciplinary actions.The Republican Party nominated a man who assaulted U.S. troops in Iraq and asserted they stole millions; who assaulted Ted Cruz's father claiming he was associated with the death of President Kennedy; assaulted Bill Clinton and claimed he was a rapist. He labelled Mexicans as rapists who brought in drugs and crime; he verbally assaulted African-Americans and asserted they were all living in destitution without any occupations and schools, that they were nothing more than a bad memory; he who assaulted Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, as a "war zone" and assaulted the United States of America and guaranteed it was in a "death spiral."The Republican Party designated for president a man who lied about opposing the war in Iraq, when there is a tape of him condoning it. It was a tape-recorded on the main commemoration of 9/11… trump lied about six million dollars in altruistic gifts to veterans' gatherings from his fundraiser; he lied about bequeathing his benefits from The Celebrity Apprentice, and from "Trump the Game" to St. Jude Cancer Centre. He lied as to why he wouldn't discharge his taxes since he was being audited and substantiated himself a liar by saying he would release his taxes if Hillary Clinton discharged her email messages; he lied about sending his personal jet to ferry stranded U.S. servicemen; he lied about his business in Russia; he lied about meeting Russian president Putin; he lied about "a few people" needing a moment of silence for the killer of five Dallas police officers; he lied about observing a large number of Muslims in New Jersey praising 9/11; he lied about 9/11 criminals sending their wives and lovers home to Saudi Arabia.He lied about a huge number of Syrian exile militants being furtively admitted into the country; and lied about the Chicago police asking him to cancel a rally; he lied about the Chicago police saying they could unravel crime there with "tough police tactics"; he lied about ISIS making millions per week selling Libyan oil; he lied that a nonconformist who attempted to surge onto his stage had "ties to ISIS"; and he lied about refugees entering America carrying mobile phones with "ISIS flags on them" and telephone plans paid ahead of time by ISIS!The Republican Party designated for president a man who praised himself in two tweets and an official statement for anticipating terrorist assaults like Orlando, while bodies still lay in the Pulse dance nightclub. He praised himself after the murder of Dwyane Wade's cousin. He praised himself on foreseeing Brexit, despite the fact that three weeks prior he had never even heard of Brexit.It was he who recommended that Russia or China ought to sanction a Watergate-like hacking of Hillary Clinton's messages; who proposed forbidding Muslims from entering the nation, then at that point said it was just a recommendation, then backflipped again and proposed it once more; who proposed open racial profiling; who proposed restricting individuals from "terror countries," saying, " Look it up, they have a list"; who proposed "ideological accreditation" for foreigners; who proposed more regrettable than waterboarding while at the same time applauding how Saddam Hussein, Vladimir Putin, and Kim Jong-un took care of protests and psychological warfare; who suggested that regular American people be tried by military commissions at Gitmo; who proposed killing the families of psychological militants and suspected terrorists.Here’s a “president” who proposed that schools teach compulsory patriotism; recommended that his supporters designate themselves as political race day voting monitors; proposed evading government debt by printing more money; proposed reducing national obligation by paying short of what was agreed to. He’s a man who planned a wall along the Mexican border to keep out undocumented foreigners; proposed mass expelling of undocumented workers; proposed a smaller divider and fewer deportations during a taped TV interview that played at the same time he was giving a speech in Phoenix demanding a bigger wall and even more expulsions; he suggested promptly removing a few million undocumented migrants, despite the fact that this would resemble attempting to empty the city of Chicago in one day; he proposed ousting any others not indicted but accused of a wrongdoing.All this would be enacted by a man who proposed to order this by bypassing Congress, despite the fact that he employed undocumented migrants in the construction of Trump Tower; despite the fact that those outsiders state not only did he know about them but he personally procured them; despite the fact that his modelling agency and TV programs enabled undocumented settlers; despite the fact that his wife may have worked here without legitimate documentation; despite the fact that his own grandfather was purportedly not just a deceitful displaced person to this nation but was denied re-entry to Germany since he was a draft-dodger.This is a man who guaranteed he comprehended prejudice against African-Americans in light of the fact that the framework is likewise rigged against him; who claimed the political race will be fixed against him; who asserted the opinion polls are fixed against him, at that point lauded one of precisely the same surveys when it favoured him; who has asserted he was his own best international strategy consultant; guaranteed that Putin won't go into Ukraine when he previously attacked Ukraine in 2014; asserted the U.S. is paying rent for an army installation in Saudi Arabia when the last one there shut in 2003.Here’s a “president” who claims that any competitor using a teleprompter ought to be ineligible, and afterwards started using one; he declared that he doesn't use notes for speeches during a discourse he gave that came essentially from notes; he declared he will fix the issues of African-Americans, then days after the fact, proposed that an African-American athlete objecting to police shootings should leave America.The Republican Party has really done a job selecting a man who was discovered to have asked his international strategy counsellors multiple times in a single hour why America cannot utilise atomic weapons since she has atomic weapons in the wake of having asked a TV interviewer a similar inquiry; who was seen to have not comprehended what the "nuclear triad” (set of three) was.Here’s a hypocrite who was exposed to have been the political recipient of fake Internet accounts guaranteed by the Kremlin; discovered to have inappropriately sought crusade commitments from remote nationals, including authorities of remote governments; a man who was revealed to have deleted all his email messages, incorporating those looked for in a lawsuit for five years; uncovered to have plagiarized up to 20 pages in his Trump Institute handbook; revealed to have hired the author of his wife’s Convention speech which appropriated some portion of a speech composed for Michelle Obama by Hillary Clinton's previous speech specialist; and who has aligned himself with his own son, who follows a progression of racial oppressor Twitter accounts.The Republican Party has assigned for “president”, a man who tweeted thanks to Billy Joel for dedicating a song to him, never acknowledging who Joel was, thus, by doing so, deriding him; he who gave a trade speech in Monessen, Pennsylvania, stood before a wall made out of bundles of compacted rubbish; who boasted during a presidential discussion about the size of his genitalia; who gave a TV interview while situated before a photo of himself wearing an all too similar suit, shirt, and tie (Oompa Loompa); who showed up in a joint news gathering with the leader of Mexico, with two bobby pins so obvious, they were holding his hairdo in place because he’d run out of hairspray.If it wasn’t so serious it would be laughable.The Republican Party has really paid homage to America. Choosing for president an untrustworthy, naïve, whimsical, malignant bigot. An Islamophobic, fascistic, vindictive, barbaric individual named donald john trump.Crazy. Just utter madness.

View Our Customer Reviews

I've been using Cocodoc for years and years now! Sending a document for an electronic signature has never been easier. I love how my clients can sign the documents straight from their phones. CocoDoc makes it sooooo easy for my clients to review and sign documents!

Justin Miller