Washington State Health Care Directive Rcw: Fill & Download for Free

Anthony Caputo asks the question:“Why do supporters of WA I-1639 think it will reduce crime when murders with rifles in WA historically have been in the single digits?”As I work in Washington (for the time being) but live in Oregon I was unfamiliar with this measure and went to do some research.HOLY CRAP!!!!!!!!!!!!!Here are some important details from the measure (no, this is not a direct copy of the entirety of the text, no I did not read all of it as I was losing my mind to the vacuous nature of the measure:In particular, shootings involving the use of semiautomatic assault rifles have resulted in hundreds of lives lost,The impacts of gun violence by assault weapons fall heavily on children and teenagers.Implementing an enhanced background check system for semiautomatic assault rifles that is as strong as the one required to purchase a handgun and requiring safety training and a waiting period will help ensure that we keep these weapons out of dangerous hands.ENHANCED BACKGROUND CHECKS. RCW 9.41.090 and 2018 c 201 s 6003 are each amended to read as follows:(1) In addition to the other requirements of this chapter, no dealer may deliver a pistol to the purchaser thereof until:(a) The purchaser produces a valid concealed pistol license and the dealer has recorded the purchaser's name, license number, and issuing agency, such record to be made in triplicate and processed as provided in subsection (((5))) (6) of this section. 9.41.070 at the time of issuance;(b) The dealer is notified in writing by (i) the chief of police or the sheriff of the jurisdiction in which the purchaser resides that the purchaser is eligible to possess a pistol under RCW 9.41.040 and that the application to purchase is approved by the chief of police or sheriff;(2) In addition to the other requirements of this chapter, no dealer may deliver a semiautomatic assault rifle to the purchaser thereof until:(a) The purchaser provides proof that he or she has completed a recognized firearm safety training program within the last five years that, at a minimum, includes instruction on:(i) Basic firearms safety rules;(ii) Firearms and children, including secure gun storage and talking to children about gun safety;(iii) Firearms and suicide prevention; (iv) Secure gun storage to prevent unauthorized access and use;(v) Safe handling of firearms; and(vi) State and federal firearms laws, including prohibited firearms transfers.The training must be sponsored by a federal, state, county, or municipal law enforcement agency, a college or university, a nationally recognized organization that customarily offers firearms training, or a firearms training school with instructors certified by a nationally recognized organization that customarily offers firearms training.The proof of training shall be in the form of a certification that states under the penalty of perjury the training included the minimum requirements;and (b) The dealer is notified in writing by (i) the chief of police or the sheriff of the jurisdiction in which the purchaser resides that the purchaser is eligible to possess a firearm under RCW 9.41.040 and that the application to purchase is approved by the chief of police or sheriff;or (ii) the state that the purchaser is 5 eligible to possess a firearm under RCW 9.41.040, as provided in subsection (3)(b) of this section; or (c) The requirements or time periods in RCW 9.41.092 have been satisfied. (3)(a) Except as provided in (b) of this subsection, in determining whether the purchaser meets the requirements of RCW 9.41.040, the chief of police or sheriff, or the designee of either, shall check with the national crime information center, including the national instant criminal background check system, provided for by the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act (18 U.S.C. Sec. 921 et seq.), the Washington state patrol electronic database, the health care authority electronic database, and with other agencies or resources as appropriate, to determine whether the applicant is ineligible under RCW 9.41.040 to possess a firearm.(b) The state, through the legislature or initiative process, may enact a statewide firearms background check system equivalent to, or more comprehensive than, the check required by (a) of this subsection to determine that a purchaser is eligible to possess a firearm under RCW 9.41.040.Once ((the)) a state system is established, a dealer shall use the state system and national instant criminal background check system, provided for by the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act (18 U.S.C. Sec. 921 et seq.), to make criminal background checks of applicants to purchase firearms.(((2))) (b) Ten business days have elapsed from the date the licensed dealer requested the background check. However, for sales and transfers of pistols if the purchaser or transferee does not 10 have a valid permanent Washington driver's license or state identification card or has not been a resident of the state for the previous consecutive ninety days, then the time period in this subsection shall be extended from ten business days to sixty days.(3) Every store, shop, or sales outlet where firearms are sold that is registered as a dealer in firearms with the department of licensing, upon the sale or transfer of a firearm, shall deliver a written warning to the purchaser or transferee that states, in block letters not less than one-fourth inch in height:WARNING: YOU MAY FACE CRIMINAL PROSECUTION IF YOU STORE OR LEAVE AN UNSECURED FIREARM WHERE A PERSON WHO IS PROHIBITED FROM POSSESSING FIREARMS CAN AND DOES OBTAIN POSSESSIONSec. 7. RCW 9.41.094 and 2018 c 201 s 6004 are each amended to read as follows: A signed application to purchase a pistol or semiautomatic assault rifle shall constitute a waiver of confidentiality and written request that the health care authority, mental health institutions, and other health care facilities release, to an inquiring court or law enforcement agency, information relevant to the applicant's eligibility to purchase a pistol or semiautomatic assault rifle to an inquiring court or law enforcement agency.Sec. 9. RCW 9.41.0975 and 2009 c 216 s 7 are each amended to read as follows: (1) The state, local governmental entities, any public or private agency, and the employees of any state or local governmental entity or public or private agency, acting in good faith, are immune from liability:(25) "Semiautomatic assault rifle" means any rifle which utilizes a portion of the energy of a firing cartridge to extract the fired cartridge case and chamber the next round, and which requires a separate pull of the trigger to fire each cartridge.[edited for readability and emphasis added]https://www.sos.wa.gov/_assets/elections/initiatives/finaltext_1531.pdfWow, what a steaming pile of infringement that is.So, for the laity who don’t get the gist of this:EVERY semi-automatic rifle in existence would be defined by this Washington Initiative as a “semiautomatic assault rifle”That includes this one:Don’t believe me? Here is the pertinent section of the measure again:(25) "Semiautomatic assault rifle" means any rifle which utilizes a portion of the energy of a firing cartridge to extract the fired cartridge case and chamber the next round, and which requires a separate pull of the trigger to fire each cartridge.Now, should this measure pass it is important to note that you have to give up your HIPPA rights so that the State can dig through your medical records.It is also important to note that the state can penalize you for the actions of others if someone gets their hands on your firearmsWARNING: YOU MAY FACE CRIMINAL PROSECUTION IF YOU STORE OR LEAVE AN UNSECURED FIREARM WHERE A PERSON WHO IS PROHIBITED FROM POSSESSING FIREARMS CAN AND DOES OBTAIN POSSESSION(24) "Secure gun storage" means: (a) A locked box, gun safe, or other secure locked storage space that is designed to prevent unauthorized use or discharge of a firearm; and (b) The act of keeping an unloaded firearm stored by such means.While the state exempts everyone who may have legal authority to stop someone:Sec. 9. RCW 9.41.0975 and 2009 c 216 s 7 are each amended to read as follows: (1) The state, local governmental entities, any public or private agency, and the employees of any state or local governmental entity or public or private agency, acting in good faith, are immune from liability:This essentially creates a two class system.Further, if you move into the state and find a nice new rifle you want to buy, you would now have to wait not 10 days, but SIXTY days.Honestly I’m not sure if I would want this measure to pass or not.Given the current makeup of the SCOTUS I’m 93% certain it would be struck down as unconstitutional.Then again, I don’t want the nose of the camel in the tent.It is measures like this that are continuing proof that the anti-freedom caucus of the American Political Left is hell-bent on a step-by-step disarmament of the citizenry and this kind of behavior must be stopped.I urge a NO!!!!!!!!!!!!! vote on WA I-1639Here is a nice summary from Ballotpedia:Washington Initiative 1639, Changes to Gun Ownership and Purchase Requirements Measure (2018) - Ballotpedia

They are required to have told you how you can get and what records are yours when you start treatment. The records you have a right to may not include therapy notes in many cases. Your health care provider usually must let you see your medical record or give you a copy of it as promptly as required by the circumstances, but no later than 15 working days after they receive your request. This right is called the right to access your medical record. Your health care provider cannot deny you access to your record because they think the information in the record might upset you or that it might cause you mental harm. However, they can deny your request if they believe you will become upset enough to physically harm yourself or another person.Here are some of the Washington State laws.(1) A health care provider who provides health care at a health care facility that the provider operates and who maintains a record of a patient's health care information shall create a "notice of information practices" that contains substantially the following:NOTICE"We keep a record of the health care services we provide you. You may ask us to see and copy that record. You may also ask us to correct that record. We will not disclose your record to others unless you direct us to do so or unless the law authorizes or compels us to do so. You may see your record or get more information about it at . . . . . ."(2) The health care provider shall place a copy of the notice of information practices in a conspicuous place in the health care facility, on a consent form or with a billing or other notice provided to the patient.Here is the Washington State law:RCW 70.02.310Mental health services—Information and records.(1) Resource management services shall establish procedures to provide reasonable and timely access to information and records related to mental health services for an individual. However, access may not be denied at any time to records of all medications and somatic treatments received by the person.(2) Following discharge, a person who has received mental health services has a right to a complete record of all medications and somatic treatments prescribed during evaluation, admission, or commitment and to a copy of the discharge summary prepared at the time of his or her discharge. A reasonable and uniform charge for reproduction may be assessed.(3) Information and records related to mental health services may be modified prior to inspection to protect the confidentiality of other patients or the names of any other persons referred to in the record who gave information on the condition that his or her identity remain confidential. Entire documents may not be withheld to protect such confidentiality.(4) At the time of discharge resource management services shall inform all persons who have received mental health services of their rights as provided in this chapter .The exceptions when they can deny you your records are this:Patient's request—Denial of examination and copying.(1) Subject to any conflicting requirement in the public records act, chapter 42.56 RCW, a health care provider may deny access to health care information by a patient if the health care provider reasonably concludes that:(a) Knowledge of the health care information would be injurious to the health of the patient;(b) Knowledge of the health care information could reasonably be expected to lead to the patient's identification of an individual who provided the information in confidence and under circumstances in which confidentiality was appropriate;(c) Knowledge of the health care information could reasonably be expected to cause danger to the life or safety of any individual;(d) The health care information was compiled and is used solely for litigation, quality assurance, peer review, or administrative purposes; or(e) Access to the health care information is otherwise prohibited by law.(2) If a health care provider denies a request for examination and copying under this section, the provider, to the extent possible, shall segregate health care information for which access has been denied under subsection (1) of this section from information for which access cannot be denied and permit the patient to examine or copy the disclosable information.(3) If a health care provider denies a patient's request for examination and copying, in whole or in part, under subsection (1)(a) or (c) of this section, the provider shall permit examination and copying of the record by another health care provider, selected by the patient, who is licensed, certified, registered, or otherwise authorized under the laws of this state to treat the patient for the same condition as the health care provider denying the request. The health care provider denying the request shall inform the patient of the patient's right to select another health care provider under this subsection. The patient shall be responsible for arranging for compensation of the other health care provider so selected.The guidelines state: "In the absence of a superseding requirement, psychologists may consider retaining full records until seven years after the last date of service delivery for adults or until three years after a minor reaches the age of majority, whichever is later." So, if it is longer than that they may have disposed of them.Civil remedies.(1) A person who has complied with this chapter may maintain an action for the relief provided in this section against a health care provider or facility who has not complied with this chapter.(2) The court may order the health care provider or other person to comply with this chapter. Such relief may include actual damages, but shall not include consequential or incidental damages. The court shall award reasonable attorneys' fees and all other expenses reasonably incurred to the prevailing party.(3) Any action under this chapter is barred unless the action is commenced within two years after the cause of action is discovered.(4) A violation of this chapter shall not be deemed a violation of the consumer protection act,Here is a typical notice from a psychological services facility:Client RightsThe health and financial records we create and store are the property of the Washington State University Psychology Clinic. The protected health information in it, however, generally belongs to you. You have a right to:Receive a copy, read, and ask questions about your protected health information as well as request restrictions to its use and/or disclosure. You must deliver this request to us in writing. Although we are not required to grant the request, we consider it and typically comply unless the request could pose a potential harm.Request and receive a paper copy of the most current “Notice of Privacy Practices” for protected health information.Request that you be allowed to see and obtain a copy of your protected health information. You may make this request in writing. Charges for copies of your medical record will apply in accordance with Washington state law.Ask that your health information be given to you by another means or at another location. Please sign, date, and give us your request in writing.Cancel prior authorizations to use or disclose health information by giving us a written revocation. Your revocation does not affect information that has already been released. Also, it does not affect any action taken before we have received it.Please note that we do not normally include raw psychological testing materials in disclosures of information, in order to protect the security of these tests.

“Enjoy your time in jail. I will not bail you out. I will not attend your trial. I will report the car stolen and where it’s expected to be”Is a good start.A drivers licence, is not a ‘you have a car’ pass.Are they paying rent?Are they paying for the car?Is their name on the car title?Is there any insurance listing them as the primary driver of a vehicle?Do they even know and understand how much it is to have a car? Or is it just a ‘GIMME THE THING! I WANT THE THING! I DON’T CARE NUMBERS ARE STUPID JUST GIVE ME THE THING!’They are just brushing up against being an ‘adult’. The age at which you are no longer obligated to provide anything for them. A fact my abusive ex family brought up again and again.Now, they ‘helped’ me by getting me an overpriced used car which soaked up all my disposable income.Perhaps you should ‘help’ this idiot via the same method.Offer to help with a bit of the downpayment. None of the monthlies. Offer to let them be on your insurance, but them having to pay for it.If they complain that they don’t have any money, then well. They’re of age to work. Jobs are amazingly shocking ways of showing just how much, or little, ones time is actually worth.Many idiot humans leave high school thinking ‘oh, i’m going to be rich, because INCOME’ then run into ‘wait, i have to spend most of it every month to not be homeless?’ and realize how freaking expensive it is to tread water and what their family had been doing for them. Even without actually having to move out.Some stay asses and manage to get random jobs which allow them to, with no giant weight of RENT to carry, live a party life for a while. Til they get too noxious, told to move out, then must carry the ANCHOR OF RENT about like everyone else.A lot of idiot humans who don’t understand budgeting, or how a single zero is actually a MASSIVE deal when it comes to money…Pick an overpriced car, because the monthly payment is just barely doable for themselves.Then realize after a while that no, it’s actually NOT worth every cent they make to keep it running, and sell it at a loss.The entirety of living, is one long extended word problem.And if you messup, you either ‘borrow’ money from other people, or wind up on someones couch with no stuff.If you want to be even more blunt, tell them ‘you are an idiot who can’t do math. sityour ass down, and I’m going to go over exactly how much comes in, how much goes out, and why if you steal my car i’m going to be pissed, and exactly WHY, with NUMBERS you can’t have a new car’You, are the parent of another human.You have physically shoveled their shit.You don’t get the luxury of being embarased, or ashamed, or even giving a shit that someone might know your finances; you have had a FAMILY member, supposedly, threaten to STEAL something of a high enough money value that it runs the risk of actually demolishing their life before it gets started. This is beyond stupid.Some violent apes will suggest physical threatening and posturing.This is on the basis that some humans react to a single physical instance of violence in the same fashion as some animals. Such tend to stop trying to become the dominant part of a relationship when pain is inflicted for trying. Personally, I think this shows a lack of care and a desire to ‘get back’ at said no longer underage humans for being annoying, but that’s my opinion.If they can’t COMMUNICATE beyond hitting, then what is the point of having an overly large brain and the capacity to use language? They might as well be poo flinging monkies.And that’s basically what I’m suggesting. Talk.If you must, use calm direct words and insult their capacity to do math, their lack of patience, their incapacity to aparently plan things out in detail, and lack of capacity or willingness to think about consequences.Being underage means you can get away with some shit, in exchange for having more or less no rights. But the second that timer hits 18, suddenly it’s no longer fun. It’s legal issues, lack of jobs later on, lack of college, etc. They NEED to get this, or they’ll wind up doing something very, very stupid for minimal gain and loose a few years of freedom.In the meantime, don’t hang any spare keys out. And tell him for that stupid bit of bluster and threatening, that he’s lost his car privelages. No time limit. If he throws a fit, state one year.Again, this is not a computer or a toy to throw a fit to have time with.IT. IS. A. CAR. An object starting at roughly 1 year and four months of working 8 hour days at minimum wage, in cost. 1.3 years. And that’s without the cost of running it, fuel and insurance. It is not a toy, nor is it cheap. And that’s for a ford festiva or other, literally, cheapest new car on the market.But, still. It’s only a bit over a year, at any minimum wage job, if he can not spend it all like an idiot as fast as he gets it, before he can get it himself, in cash, with not having to spend all spare income on either shelter or food.If you want to be even more blunt with an idiot, ask exactly, what car, and how much, and then tell them how much of their lifetime that is, doing something they don’t particularly want to do, and having exactly zero other money to do anything else with, despite working full time.Selling and profiting off someone elses time and effort, for a toy one has little regard for, is very murican. And very much a behavior which never really gains friends. I hope you see this as a chance to help them understand this.You see it was the ‘new’ that caught my eye and made me want to answer this.And, you are free to use this in response to your idiot: a stranger on the internet, told me that they would have zero respect for me giving a new car to a new driver, on account of how they would almost certainly wreck it. Because it’s true~I would think you actually would need a mental health evaluation, personally, for the above reasons. ^_^;New drivers break cars.New drivers should NEVER TOUCH new cars.New drivers should never use a car with more than about 140-180 horsepower, though power to weight should also never be extremely poor.New drivers should not use expensive cars, nor ones with any degree of special paint or body work.new drivers should never have a car capable of doing a burnout. chriping tires, not a problem. Burnout, big problems.New drivers should not have any car considered ‘cool’ or which would give a reason to try to show off.IMO: best choices: 10 year old volvo station wagon.Plenty of room for stuff, people, they’re AWD or RWD, and they’re high rated in safety to the point the insurance won’t be ultra horrible.Sorry if this answer seems a bit long winded, rambling or such; If one is going to say ‘no’ one MUST have a reason. Ideally, lots of reasons, to be piled up, one after another til the other party simply understands that they are being unreasonable. Else as mentioned, the story will simply go ‘…and he stole my car, and wrecked it, got arrested, and now i have no car and i’m not sure if I should post bail’ You can’t just say no. You have to get him to agree that yes, the answer is no, and he’s a bad/stupid person if he keeps pressing more. So smile when you explain it, complain gently that apparently public school math was not soaking in and ask them to look up what the local equivalent of:Taking a Motor Vehicle without Permission (TMV) in the 2nd Degree (9A.56.075):A person commits TMV 2nd degree by intentionally taking a vehicle without the permission of the owner or by voluntarily riding in a vehicle with knowledge that the vehicle was unlawfully taken.TMV 2nd Degree is a class C felony punishable by a maximum of 5 years in jail and a $10,000 fine. Actual penalties for a Washington theft crime, however, are determined by the Sentencing Reform Act, RCW 9.94A and the Washington State Sentencing Guidelines.is.Cause, seriously, that’s the price of a car there, and way longer than it would take to save up for one in ‘you get to do nothing’ time.And lastly, um. If you’re using the car to job/work/etc, and then can’t due to it not being there, and then get fired, then HE is out of a place to live too.Again, idiot who is not thinking things through all the way, so gets no respect from me. ^-^Good luck with whatever happens!