You Dont Need A Time Machine To Change The Future: Fill & Download for Free

The group tries to find Suzuha’s father.They are unable to find him but hear that someone looking “like a barrel” tried to make the same pin badge they have (hint it might be her father as it came from him).Okabe finds out that Daru is the one who wanted to create (or rather, “recreate”) the badge.Okabe tells Daru it’s bad because it would be a lie to create a fake father.Daru says that Suzuha told him that her time machine can’t go to the future only to the past (so she can’t go back, in 2010 and neither in her own time after the success of her mission) so it’s why he wanted to create a comforting lie. But he abandons the idea.Daru finishes with the time machine reparations.Mayuri finds out who is Suzuha’s father (it’s Daru). The letters on the pin are their family name initials with the exception of Faris (Okabe, Shiina, Hashida, Makise, Kiryu, Urushibara, Faris, Amane, 2010). Mayuri also gives the other clues (Suzuha’s father created the resistance along with Okabe, he knew about Okabe’s reading steiner, he was in Akihabara in 2010, his code name barrel comes from the way he looks but also is a pun on his name itaru (taru being barrel in japanese they say) and he constructed a time machine, the time machine interior is similar to the phone microwave (name subject to change).Suzuha goes to 1975 after finally finding her father and can continue her mission happily. Shes goes there to find the IBN5100 that is missing (it is missing because some of the d-mails messed with what I like to call its “position causality”, that’s why it disappeared from the lab, where is it and how to get it back will be explained further into the story). They need the IBN in order to break the alpha attractor field convergence that is forcing the fate of SERN taking over the world. For Okabe, it also means he can save Mayuri inescapable death in the alpha attractor field that way.Something happened. The repair wasn’t complete so Suzuha had an accident in the past. She became amnesic and lost the memories of who she is and what was her mission. She lived until it was too late to find any IBN and couldn’t do her mission. When she regained her memories, she fell into despair. At the end, she committed suicide after writing a letter to Okabe.In the letter she says that Okabe forcing her to stay is probably the cause of her accident and thus amnesia as if she didn’t stay selfishly in 2010 in order to find her father, the time machine wouldn’t have broken (from the flood).After being torn about what to do (erase the fact that she found about her father) he ultimately decide to send a d-mail to stop himself from keeping her in this era. The worldline shifts because when she goes to the past she can obtain the IBN for the lab.Suzuha still died in 2000 but this time was no suicide. It was from illness which you might say is a lot better. But she had obtained the IBN. She still got involved with Mr. Braun but this time she took care of him and even saved his life in an accident. The divergence meter is still in his house and Okabe can see that the divergence number changed.In this worldline, the rounders dont attack the lab that one night. Will it do later on? IS Mayuri safe or not? We’ll see that next epîsode.

The main problem with nearly every negative response to this question, in my mind, is based on a false premise. Eg, “Well if we killed someone ……you will change time…!”? Why does everyone assume a time traveller can automatically be seen, heard - sensed?! Let alone effect the happenings in that time.My belief is that we can time travel but we cannot affect anything. We cannot be seen, heard or sensed in anyway & this seems to be the biggest hurdle in the minds of the cynics. They dont appear to want to go any further with this debate to see another way of “being somewhere else”.If we were able to change things in the past someone wouldnt someone have already done it? Do we live in a world where strangely dressed humans from the future come back to us & say “Hold up everybody! I m just gonna change history!.. or the future!…er.. or the past! well.whatever?Of course not.So that rules out tangible evidence of futuristic people travelling back to, say where we are now. 2016. Which leaves the possability of non intrusive time travel.One problem is if we travelled on a time machine we, as a passenger, would be dead by the time the machine got to the year 2100. Is it possible, therefore, that the machine itself would have aged accordingly? If so, how long into the future could the machine continue?Is it possible, therefore, to have the passenger age but not the machine?If you age then why doesnt the machine age? I think the answer is that if one exists then the other also has to exist.So that leaves us with the question of how do we go back or forward in time without affecting our own age?We would need an advanced form of our understanding of science to enable time travel & within that understanding we need to include ourselvelves surviving this experience. Thats actually more simple than may first appear.If you can time travel the materials which make up the machine, we can time travel the materials which make up ourselves.So I dont agree with the reasons against this.

But a collective insanity has sprouted around the new field of “cryptocurrencies”, causing an irrational gold rush worldwide. It has gotten to the point where a large number of financial stories – and questions in my inbox – ask whether or not to “invest” in BitCoin.Let’s start with the answer: no. You should not invest in Bitcoin.The reason why is that it’s not an investment; just as gold, tulip bulbs, Beanie Babies, and rare baseball cards are also not investments.Considering a lot of fake websites and ICOS and also exchange platforms that engages in fraudulent activities where they eventually rip you of your cryptocurrency I introduce you to hedge gainers(www.cryptohedgegainers.tech) where they help you recover your lost cryptocurrency and help shut down the fake platforms and also offer financial advices.These are all things that people have bought in the past, driving them to absurd prices, not because they did anything useful or produced money or had social value, but solely because people thought they could sell them on to someone else for more money in the future.When you make this kind of purchase – which you should never do – you are speculating. This is not a useful activity. You’re playing a psychological, win-lose battle against other humans with money as the sole objective. Even if you win money through dumb luck, you have lost time and energy, which means you have lost.Investing means buying an asset that actually creates products, services or cashflow, such as a profitable business or a rentable piece of real estate, for an extended period of time. An investment is something that has intrinsic value – that is, it would be worth owning from a financial perspective, even if you could never sell it.To answer why bitcoin has become so big, we need to separate the usefulness of the underlying technology called “blockchain” from the mania of people turning bitcoin into a big dumb lottery. Blockchain is simply a nifty software invention (which is open-source and free for anyone to use), whereas bitcoin is just one well-known way to use it.A bitcoin is not an investment, just as gold, tulip bulbs, Beanie Babies, and rare baseball cards are also not investments. Photograph: Michael S Green/APBlockchain is a computer protocol that allows two people (or machines) to do transactions (sometimes anonymously) even if they don’t trust each other or the network between them. It can have monetary applications or in sharing files, but it’s not some instant trillionaire magic.As a real-world comparison for blockchain and bitcoin, take this example from the blogger the unassuming broker:Imagine that someone had found a cure for cancer and posted the step-by-step instructions on how to make it online, freely available for anyone to use.Now imagine that the same person also created a product called Cancer-Pill using their own instructions, trade marked it, and started selling it to the highest bidders.I think we can all agree a cure for cancer is immensely valuable to society (blockchain may or may not be, we still have to see), however, how much is a Cancer-Pill worth?Our banker goes on to explain that the first Cancer-Pill (bitcoin) might initially see some great sales. Prices would rise, especially if supply was limited (just as an artificial supply limit is built into the bitcoin algorithm).Bitcoin has become a bubble with the forces of human herd behavior, greed, and fear of missing out amplifying itBut since the formula is open and free, other companies quickly come out with their own cancer pills. Cancer-Away, CancerBgone, CancEthereum, and any other number of competitors would spring up. Anybody can make a pill, and it costs only a few cents per dose.Yet imagine everybody starts bidding up Cancer-Pills to the point that they cost $17,000 each and fluctuate widely in price, seemingly for no reason. Newspapers start reporting on prices daily, triggering so many tales of instant riches that even your barber and your massage therapist are offering tips on how to invest in this new “asset class”.Instead of seeing how ridiculous this is, more people start bidding up every new variety of pill (cryptocurrencies), until they are some of the most “valuable” things on the planet.Various cryptocurrencies, ranked by how many people have been fooled.“Holy shit!” is the only reasonable reaction.You’ve got bitcoin with a market value of $238bn, then Ethereum at $124bn, and so on.The imaginary value of these valueless bits of computer data represents enough money to change the course of the human race, for example, eliminating poverty or replacing the world’s 800 gigawatts of coal power plants with solar generation.Bitcoin (AKA Cancer-Pills) has become an investment bubble, with the complementary forces of human herd behavior, greed, fear of missing out, and a lack of understanding of past financial bubbles amplifying it.To better understand this mania, we need to look at why bitcoin was invented in the first place.As the legend goes, in 2008 an anonymous developer published a white paper under the fake name Satoshi Nakamoto. The author was evidently a software and math person. But the paper also has some in-built ideology: the assumption that giving national governments the ability to monitor flows of money in the financial system and use it as a form of law enforcement is wrong.