Of Entry Masquerade Entry Form: Fill & Download for Free

Quick SummaryRating: Negative amounts of stars.Pros: Can’t think of any really…Cons: Home typing and data entry jobs are being masqueraded as ways to make millions online by filling in forms. Real home typing jobs are almost impossible to find and usually don’t pay more than minimum wage.Our Recommendation: Stop looking for something that doesn’t exist. Easy work is outsourced to overseas companies who will work for pennies on the dollar. You just can’t compete and you certainly won’t get rich by doing it. We recommend you learn how to build a real, sustainable business online with our top recommendation.Full ReviewWe just couldn’t do it, y’all. Even though we promised here to review home typing jobs, the top search results are so blatantly misleading that we couldn’t bring ourselves to sign up. Not only are we certain that home typing jobs sites are are lying, but we also don’t want to give personal information and credit card numbers to dishonest people.So we can’t claim to have tried what we’re about to trash. It’s just our collective opinion. Take that for what it’s worth. However, we are writing from lots of experience with sites that are long on hype and short on delivery.Earn Cash Online for Reading Paid Email, Taking Surveys and More! is like all the others we’ve seen before. This post is an analysis of the red flags that are all over the site, not an insider’s review of the program.Can You Make Money with Earn Cash Online for Reading Paid Email, Taking Surveys and More!?No. Well, a very few will. In fact, if you choose to pursue the program that you bought, you’ll end up spending money, not earning it. That’s because you won’t be doing “typing jobs” at all. You’ll be doing affiliate marketing.Why Earn Cash Online for Reading Paid Email, Taking Surveys and More!?There are tons of sites offering to sell you the secrets of getting rich by typing at home. The link above includes a list of the top search results for “home typiing jobs,” each of them pretty much the same. Why settle on Earn Cash Online for Reading Paid Email, Taking Surveys and More!? It’s very simple: because of the gorgeous babe at the top of the page. Oh, be still, my heart! If I’m going to spend a lot of time looking at a site to dissect it, I might as well look at her instead of the cheesy stock photos and ugly snapshots at typingwealth.com.What You Mean by “Typist Jobs”When you go to Google looking for “home typing jobs,” here’s what you imagine: You think you’ll get hooked up with some company that needs you to type up paper documents to digitize them. Or maybe a law firm that needs you to transcribe audio files. You think you’ll do, you know, typing. You also believe that, in return for your work, you’ll get a paycheck. That’s what “job” means, after all.Sites like Earn Cash Online for Reading Paid Email, Taking Surveys and More! know this is what you’re looking for, and they use that knowledge to take your money. They know you’ll ask yourself, “Is this legitimate? Is it really possible?” They also know most people won’t think to ask, “Will I really be doing typing work? Will I get paid by the hour or based on my volume?”What They Mean by “Typist Jobs”You see, they let you think that their definition of “typist jobs” is the same as yours. That assumption is what gets people to take out their credit cards. But when you complain that they lied to you, they’ll say you misunderstood. To them, “typist jobs” means: “Creating affiliate ads and then sending them all over the Net.” To them, “getting paid” means: “Commissions you get if someone clicks on your ad and then buys what it offers.”If that’s what you want to do, go for it. Lots of people make money online with affiliate ads, and if you’re going to get into it, you might as well start by buying from the page with the beautiful woman.But if that’s not what you had in mind when you searched for typing jobs, run fast, run far. Earn Cash Online for Reading Paid Email, Taking Surveys and More! is chock full of red flags that shout, YOU ARE BEING MISLED. Here are some of them:It claims you can make “$200, $500,or even $1,000 – EVERY single day, workingjust 15-30 minutes a day!It should go without saying, but it doesn’t: life doesn’t work that way, folks. You’re not going to get rich with no effort. Unless you’re Paris Hilton or a smoking-hot 22-year-old female friend of Eliot Spitzer, that’s true all the time.The words, “…doing data entry.”In our experience, this phrase is a dead giveaway. It’s a virtual guarantee that you won’t be doing “data entry” in the way you think of it. I once worked at the IRS. Now THAT’s data entry. Those people type so fast it makes you dizzy. And they made about $9 an hour. (See our series of smackdowns on data entry jobs here.)The words, “…99% of them are total scams!.”But this one isn’t. Really! We promise! They pretend to be your friend by acknowledging what you already suspect: that you’re being scammed. This is a “good-cop” strategy meant to tear down your defenses.The “proof” of earnings.Every site that tries to sell you a money-making program includes a picture like the one on the page as if that proves anything. But Earn Cash Online for Reading Paid Email, Taking Surveys and More! was less careful than most sites. They left the word “Clickbank” on the graph, which shows that we are in fact dealing with affiliate marketing, not typing. Those may very well be real earnings, but they’re not from filling out forms. They probably come from selling the “home typing” program to desperate people.Real typing jobs have speed requirements.If you’ve ever applied for a real typing or data entry job, you know that the employer wants to see proof of how fast you can type. If you’re slower than 70 words a minute, you won’t even get a second look from a potential employer. That’s the nature of real typing jobs. Sites like this one and many others insist that you don’t need any special skills. That’s like a company setting out to hire a computer programmer and saying, “No programming skills necessary.”Further Proof of Affiliate MarketingWe sometimes take a lot of heat for reviewing a program that we haven’t actually tried. However, when it comes to websites like these, we know what we’re dealing with because we’ve already seen it all. To emphasize my point, take for example a screen shot of a “sample” entry form for your “home typing” job. (It’s found at the bottom of the FAQ page) The site leads you to believe that all you have to do is fill in this form and get paid. What they fail to tell you is that after you fill in the form, you’ll have to spend quite a few dollars in order to get an advertisement up and running through Google Adwords.Click here to view the screen shot of their sample form.And now click here to view my screen shot of Google Adword’s back-end panel.Notice the similarities? The screen shots aren’t matching exactly because the sample form used by Earn Cash Online for Reading Paid Email, Taking Surveys and More! is a few years old. You could say that it’s pretty convenient that they “forgot” to add in the Google Adwords logo, but I say it’s a deceptive ploy to scam you out of money.The Bottom LineYou likely won’t make any money as a home typist or a home data entry clerk. It’s not you. You’re more than qualified. It’s that the work is often outsourced or you have tens of thousands of qualified people fighting over 1 spot that likely doesn’t pay over minimum wage.Source:- Online Program and Product Reviews

There exists as yet no agreement among physicists as to even the very existence of the graviton. That makes this an open access topic and emboldens indulgence in a modicum of speculation and shameless self-promotion with little actual concern for repercussion.Mandalic geometry has a lot to say about the matter. Just as soon as I gather my rambling thoughts on the subject. So much is still in flux. I need first to swirl my mind about the eddies and vortices surrounding this highly debated issue.As a teaser I will offer this much: the mathematics used in mandalic geometry is consistent with existence of eight distinctive gravitons, four of which can be their own anti-particle. We could equally say there exists a single graviton which occurs in eight different phases, like phases of the moon. But in the mad, mad, mad world of quantum mechanics all eight forms are superimposed in mandalic space-time.Are we confused yet? We have every right to be.The last Alice saw of them Mad Hatter and March Hare were trying to put Dormouse into the teapot. Had they possessed knowledge of quantum mechanics, they would have succeeded too. Without benefit of such proprietary knowledge, the two were having a difficult time of it though. Just seemed like a lot of hand-waving going on.ENTER STRING THEORYString theory suggests that the Universe has at least 10 dimensions, four of ordinary space-time and six dimensions in the Calabi-Yau manifold rolled-up so small as to be imperceptible to our senses. Mandalic geometry is in basic agreement with this conclusion but arrives at it differently than does string theory.Calabi-Yau manifoldIn mandalic geometry every hexagram or 6-tuple is analogous to a Calabi–Yau manifold. A hexagram has six Lines. Each of these Lines represents a logic gate allowing entry and exit to and from the hexagram by application of appropriate logic operators In mandalic geometry these are logic gates of a different kind. Think here of the difference between operator and operand in arithmetic.Entering a hexagram through any of its six Lines places one at a different location corresponding to the particular gate of entry. The specific gate of exit carries one to the corresponding gate of entry in one of six possible ports of call. You can refer to these as degrees of freedom if you like.The specific mathematical interactions involved can model various quantum phenomena. Now things are becoming clearer. You knew they would eventually.In a sense these dancing hexagrams can be compared to vibrating strings which are embedded in larger geometric formations that can be likened to the branes of M-theory, string theory’s newer, more inclusive incarnation. Don’t ask what “M” stands for. No one seems to know, though there is no dearth of possible candidates in circulation. One has to wonder what the big secret is all about.The hexagrams are positioned according to the rule of dimensional compositing which is a kind of addition across dimensions involving wavelike mathematical interference. The dimensional compositing rule relates hexagram positions to Cartesian coordinates in a pattern that mimics a probability distribution but is really a mandalic distribution with its own peculiar characteristics, among which randomness is conspicuously absent.Nature. as it turns out, may have no more fondness of haphazard randomness than did Einstein. Now we are beginning to see the light. There seem definite strict rules underlying the apparent randomness. Emmy Noether would approve too. How else could all those symmetries appear. And without having symmetry first, how could symmetry-breaking ever occur? Elementary, Watson.Before departing this matter, I would be amiss if I did not point out that the methodology of dimensional compositing reproduces the results of the Born rule on first principle. I don’t believe this has been done before. The wave equation predicts superpositions. The density of the various superpositions are tallied and used to determine probabilities manually. Mandalic geometry says there are no probabiilites; only certainties and spatiotemporal alternatives in a mandalic distribution masquerading as a probability distribution. And it proves this mathematically. Case closed.There are some things we still need to learn about space and time. Gravitons are among the entities trying to tell us this.Tibetan monks creating their intricate sand mandalas know much more about the geometry and potencies of mandalic form than do any physicists alive today. This is a shortcoming physicists will need to address in order to create new physics related to quantum mechanics and particularly to quantum gravity and the graviton.New physics is more likely to come from new mathematics than old mathematics.It is becoming increasingly evident that the appropriate route to quantum gravity lies not in the smooth Riemannian manifolds of general relativity but the discrete inter-dimensional geometry of the mandala.It should be clear by now that gravity in the vicinity of massive celestial bodies dealt with so successfully by Einstein in general relativity cannot be similarly constituted in context of the strangely different environment and unique conditions presented by subatomic spaces with the same success.Though gravitons are predicted by general relativity, naive quantization of general relativity cannot lead to quantum gravity, irrespective of the question of existence of gravitons.Quantum gravity will neither rise nor fall predicated on existence of the graviton. The position of mandalic geometry though is that some sort of graviton does exist in fact, and the nature of that graviton provides a major clue to what quantum gravity is really about. It may not be what we think it is.“Sometimes the questions are complicated and the answers are simple.”Dr. SeussA kōanForget the soundof one hand clapping.There are better pursuitsby which to loose your mind.What does it mean, for instance,to be living in a universeWhere there are planetswith days longerthan their years.Einstein objected to his theory being called the theory of relativity.“It is not about relativity,” he insisted.“It has to do with invariance of the velocity of light.”In committee meeting, Einstein was outvoted.The logic operators acting on the hexagrams function by a kind of multiplication analogous to the type of matrix multiplication known as the Hadamard product. They are positioned within the Cartesian context on basis of these logic operations of multiplication involving one to six parameters rather than Cartesian coordinate dynamics. There might be a connection here with the de Broglie-Bohm pilot wave theory as well since these operators in ensemble form a second mathematical wave that redirects hexagram location according to the rule of matrix multiplication.It is always the negative yin Line that brings about this redirection by geometric inversion through a point, exactly as the negative sign does in arithmetic. On the other hand, the positive yang Line is like +1 or the + sign of identity, which is to say, the identity element of multiplication that produces no change in what it interacts with.MULTIPLICATION OF TRIGRAMS:EXAMPLES OF FOUR OPERATORSTrigrams are to mandalic geometry as tensors are to general relativity. No, that’s not quite right. Trigrams are the tensors of mandalic geometry. That’s much better.In mandalic geometry these multiplicative operators and operations can implicate one to six Lines in a hexagram, changing them concurrently, thereby determining the composition of Lines in the new hexagram resulting from these changes.Changing Lines can therefore model beginning and ending particles of quantum phenomena in a manner not all that unlike the way Feynman diagrams do.How can changing Lines do this? Simple. They are specific patterns of information within greater patterns of information. And that is precisely what quantum objects and events are too. What we have here is just information modeling information. All information is in continual process. And so are hexagrams and Lines in hexagrams.What is the original source of these hexagrams?As far as we know the original source is the Chinese Classic of Change, the primordial portions of which date to 2 or 3 millennia BCE. I think the ancient Chinese were on to something. They may not have known anything about the principles of quantum mechanics but they sure knew a lot about principles of relationship and change. And what is quantum mechanics about exactly? Relationships and changing relationships.The Classic of Change is the world’s oldest surviving treatise on combinatorics, multidimensional parameters of change, and quaternary logic, all concealed in a text that has been passed from generation to generation in the guise of a method of divination. That was a brilliant cloaking device which allowed the work to survive book burnings of ancient China intact. It was one of the very few texts of Chinese antiquity that did so.According to the Classic of Change and the geometry inspired by it, there are eight gravitons (or is it one graviton with eight distinct phases?) at the central point, the point of possibility from which all points emanate: the origin of all things; where circumference meets center; the eternal Spring; the fount of all existence.The Classic of Change calls them hexagrams and bestows on each a different name. Eight stand watch at the center. There are sixty-four hexagrams in all. All of them interrelated, each to each.According to mandalic geometry the essence of quantum gravity lies hidden in this each to each. It is reflexive (4b) and hyper-volumetric. It defies reason.What does it mean to be living in a Universe in which clock hands are moving in both directions at once?What does it mean to be living in a Universe in which gravitons travel uphill and downhill at the same time?What does it mean that at Planck scale something is winding up at the same time that its reflection is winding down, and the two are inevitable reflections of one another.At a “later” stage of development, nature hits upon the idea of using DNA to create life capable of recreating itself. Where does it get such an idea? Was it always there? Is it always there? A corkscrew winding and unwinding simultaneously? Possibly a triple helix. Possibly two.Perhaps no beginning. No end perhaps. Gravitons and photons endlessly at work. Endlessly at play. Interchanging partners. Musical chairs. With a seat for all when the music stops. Only the music never ends. One helluva hoedown.“Sometimes the questions are complicated and the answers are simple.”Dr. SeussThank you for the A2A, Peter. It has been great fun. I learned a lot too.See alsoMartin Hauser's answer to What are some of the physical implications of the mathematics and logic of mandalic geometry?Martin Hauser's answer to What is compositing of dimensions, and how is it used in mandalic geometry?Martin Hauser's answer to How is the operation of multiplication performed in mandalic geometry?

Because two words: road trip! Our skulls are different because we took a road trip. I had better explain. But we’re going to have to go back to the beginning. Our beginning. The beginning of the homo sapiens.Long, long ago, in a land far, far, away, our fathers had a home.That’s the cradle of life. Modern science almost unanimously agrees that we started there. That is also where the fabled Garden of Eden probably was. The Biblical account in the book of Genesis describes it this way:Genesis chapter 2 (NIV)5 Now no shrub had yet appeared on the earth and no plant had yet sprung up, for the Lord God had not sent rain on the earth and there was no one to work the ground, 6 but streams came up from the earth and watered the whole surface of the ground.10 A river watering the garden flowed from Eden; from there it was separated into four headwaters. 11 The name of the first is the Pishon; it winds through the entire land of Havilah, where there is gold. 12 (The gold of that land is good; aromatic resin and onyx are also there.) 13 The name of the second river is the Gihon; it winds through the entire land of Cush. 14 The name of the third river is the Tigris; it runs along the east side of Ashur. And the fourth river is the Euphrates.We got our start in a hot and dry place; but we were built for it. Hot, dry climates favor long, thin frames, because these frames would have a higher body surface area to mass ratio, enabling the body to lose heat faster. So that is how we were built. And heavy sunlight favors dark skin. So this is what we probably looked like.The same principles applied to our faces as well. Our skulls were narrow in portrait (from the front/coronal plane) and broad in profile (from the side/sagittal plane).And so we looked like this.Some of the greatest art in the history of mankind is art themed on Genesis (thank God!). And some of the worst art in the history of mankind is art themed on Genesis (Why, God, WHY?). Like this painting. The first homo sapiens looked nothing like this. (Not that the Bible says they did, for that matter. This is all the artist’s lack of informed imagination.)The first of us more likely looked like this.Anyways, we left home. We moved out, along the path of least resistance.When I say moved, I mean a process of gradual relocation and resettlement. We moved slowly. We fought wars with homo neanderthalensis, our more brutish cousin who still occupied the neighboring regions. We beat them at hunting. We won, we lost, we won again. We gained ground. Entire generations lived and died between moves that happened sporadically and gradually.Over time, we moved from Africa into Eurasia.Some of us went into the Indian subcontinent. We were still dark-skinned, with the skulls of our negroid ancestors. But unlike the hot grass of Africa, the wet, hot, and leafy tropical climate of India required a different set of features.We gained a tendency to store fat. Our skin tone lightened a bit. And our facial skeleton smoothed out a little. Since the overhead sun was no longer that strong, our hairlines slipped upward a little. We developed more prominent foreheads. Our faces became less narrow; and broadened out a little.We settled into the Indian subcontinent and then went island hopping on a Pacific honeymoon.Some of us spread out into the vast steppes of Eurasia. Endless plains of grass. Bitter cold. Overcast skies. Snow in the winter.So we developed a different set of features. Since the sunlight wasn’t that strong here, our skin tone further lightened out. To deal with the harsh wind that blew almost continually, our facial skeletons decreased any prominence. Our noses grew flatter to decrease exposure to cold.Facial hair increased the risk of condensation and ice forming on our faces, so we lost most of our facial hair. To deal with the harsh sunlight, we developed a set of epicanthal folds that reduced the glare from snow and ice. The folds gave our eyes an almond shape.As we moved north, the climate intensified. It grew colder, windier, harsher.So these new features (developed to enable us to adapt to the environment) increased in intensity.Our epicanthal folds got more prominent to the point we were looking out at the world through near-slits (not that we got any less efficient or alert as hunters). Our noses flattened further. But the harsh sunlight was incentive for our skin tone to darken a little one again. We didn’t get darker as much as we got redder, more sunburned. We began to store more fat in preparation for the long lean winters.And then we began to cross continents. We crossed the Arctic circle. And we crossed into America.We retained our original features in both places.In the Arctic.And in America.As we moved into the American mainland, away from the cold and closer to the equator, we grew leaner once more. Our faces grew more angular. The epicanthal folds around our eyes grew less prominent. Our skin turned a smooth shade of nut brown.That’s right. We got really good-looking.Later immigrants to America certainly seemed to think so. Context matters, of course. The later immigrants were essentially desperate refugees or glorified bandits, and had pale complexions, like the underbelly of a fish, with minuscule marks of pink and tan on close inspection. Their ears, noses and cheekbones stuck out at conspicuous angles. They were fleeing poverty and violence, and came a long way over the water. So when they reached America, this was what they had to say about us.They were well-built, with good bodies and handsome features…And when they met the Americans at Rhode Island (the Naragansetts) they described us thus:This is the finest looking tribe, and the handsomest in their costumes, that we found in our voyage. They exceed us in size, and they are of a very fair complexion; some of them incline more to a white and others to a tawny color. Their faces are sharp, their hair long and black, upon the adorning of which they bestow great pains; their eyes are black and sharp, their expressions mild and pleasant greatly resembling the antique. I say nothing to your Majesty of the other parts of the body, which are all in good proportion, and such as belong to well-formed men. Their women are of the same form and beauty, very graceful, of fine countenance, and of pleasing appearance and manners and modesty. ...They are very generous, giving away whatever they have. We formed a great friendship with them…The people making these remarks were some of us who made a side trip via Eurasia. We had gone west into Europe.Europe was north of Africa, and further from the equator, so it was colder. We grew fairer. And we met a dying ancestor of ours: homo neanderthalensis. They existed in a belt north of our original home, but they were present in higher concentrations here. And so we began to compete. We fought a lot. Then we f**ked (a little).Because we selectively slept with their women who resembled us the most, our gene pool was slightly diluted. So we still looked like us for the most part, except for the fact that we inherited the neanderthal’s most prominent features: their prominent brows and jutting chin.So when a lot of us (on the left) mated with a few of these (on the right) a new face shape emerged. Our chin grew and supraorbital ridges (above the eyes) grew more prominent. Our faces grew less narrow, so our mouths protruded less, causing our teeth to become more crowded together.And we began to look like this.As we moved up north in Europe, into colder and harsher climates, we retained those features but gained modifications for the climate. Like epicanthal folds (just like we had in north Asia) to hood our eyes. And thinner lips.Note: So when Hitler suggested that the ‘Nordic’ look represented the most developed of all races, the Master Race, he was the opposite of correct. If anything, the “master race” got its signature face shape by breeding with the ‘lowest’: a subspecies just below us. So much for that idiotic theory of racial purity that helped kill millions of ‘undesirables’. (I am not denigrating Scandinavians, who themselves are very nice people and don’t particularly think too much of their looks. And science would tell you that interbreeding results in hybrid vigor.)Whew. And that is the larger reason for the broad variation in skull shapes.As for individual variations, there is one reason that produces consistent results: growth hormone. This hormone induces growth of bones, both in the limbs and spine, as well as the face. Now, the bones of the limbs and spine close around puberty, but the bones of the face don’t. They can grow further if plied with more growth hormone.So if a person’s testosterone/growth hormone levels were consistently high in childhood, or rise in adulthood, after puberty (they cannot grow taller): their skull shape will change. The brow and chin will become more prominent. This is called acromegaly if it happens after adulthood is attained.Observe the differences below (normal to the left, acromegalic to the right).The skull does increase in size somewhat, and some features become more prominent. This happens gradually over time, as in the case of this man with acromegaly who graciously allowed himself to be photographed over the years.The rise in growth hormone, post-puberty, can happen for any number of reasons. It could be due to a tumor secreting growth hormone. It could be due to a rise in testosterone, which activates growth hormone. Athletes often tend to have prominent chins because of their naturally higher testosterone levels. People who abuse anabolic steroids for a very long time tend to gain similar features to a smaller extent.And then there’s genetics at the individual level. If you really want to know why your jaw sticks out more than your friend’s jaw, despite the fact that you are both of the same race, and have the same hormonal history, do what every male does when he has no clue and Google will not give him the answer: go ask your mom, moms know everything.Just remember this: the differences in skull shapes mean nothing. The shape and size of your skull does not determine your intelligence or your ability to do well in life. That is science. The opposite of this is racism. (It may call itself phrenology or Nazism, but it is racism masquerading as pseudoscience.)They say beauty is in the eyes of the beholder. But I’ve been the opposite of a romantic all my life. I’m utilitarian. Beauty, for me, is in the hands of the user. So I look at these two faces below and see that they are profoundly different. But I also know that both these faces were carefully evolved via a long, slow, and painful process of experimentation and elimination, to bring them to the point where they would do the most important thing anything could do: their job.So for an unromantic functionally-oriented person like me, both these faces, and every other face I’ve used in this answer of mine, are equally beautiful. Anyone who thinks otherwise is entitled to their own opinion.(Just kidding. Anyone who thinks otherwise is wrong. Period.)P.S. I’m deliberately omitting obscure practices like artificial cranial deformation that are incapable of being transmitted down generations via epigenetics. Those are obviously irrelevant to this question. And I’m omitting finer details on interbreeding because this is an entry on Quora, not the Encyclopedia f**king Britannica, and because I really need to pee. Excuse me.Advertising is a fundamentally bad habit, but I don’t smoke, or drink, or use, so I allow myself this one vice: if you liked this answer, you may like these as well.Asher Nitin's answer to How does Clark Kent get his company medical checkup without the doctors finding out he is Superman?Asher Nitin's answer to How do I form more connections in my brain so I can be a livelier conversationalist and a quicker writer?