Building Permit Application Form Demolition: Fill & Download for Free

While Israel has a reasonable judicial system for Israelis (and I say reasonable because while there are checks and balances in place there is a strong bias in favour of Jewish Israelis over Arabs both within Israeli society and within the Israeli legal system), however bias, no such rights are extended to West Bank Palestinians.The West bank is run under two systems of Law, Israeli civil law for the Jewish settlers, and military law for Palestinian residents. The differences are stark.The IDF in the West BankFirst the soldiers that are commissioned to serve in the West Bank are told they are there simply to protect settlers and are given no authority over the settlers. Even if clashes break out over between the settlers and the Palestinian villagers, the soldiers cannot stop the settlers attacking the villagers but can arrest any Palestinian that chooses to fights back.Settlers assault Palestinians on their own land, as Israeli soldiers watchThe military commander has total control over the lives of the Palestinians with almost no checks and balances in place to ensure any semblance of a due process. Palestinians can be and are arrested without seeing any evidence, without any legal representation being allowed, detained indefinitely without charges being laid, and without notifying their families of either the arrest, where they are held, visitation rights or on what basis they have been arrested.Detained without trial and charges: Punished for being on hunger strike.Military Law allowing the arrest and detention of Palestinian Minors.In order to comply with internationally agreed protocols for human rights, Israel has strict laws preventing the incarceration of minors and for those arrested the law requires what one might consider to be reasonable protocols be adhered to. They have a right to be accompanied by a parent of guardian, a minor cannot be detained overnight without charge, interrogations must not be physical or threatening and the usual democratic rights to due processes that protects all arrested individuals in modern democratic societies must be upheld, the right to legal representation, the right to a fair trail etc. This of course only applies to Israelis.According to B’TSelem, a Israeli human rights organisation, in 2015 alone Israel had 422 Palestine minors under 18 in IPS and IDF facilities as security detainees and prisoners. 4 were under 14.Israel is known to detain Palestinian minors as young as 8.IDF troops detain 8-year-old PalestinianIsrael army arrests 8-year-old Palestinian in West BankAs of September 2020, according to B’TSalem 2 Palestinian minors are in Israeli prisons for the crime of being in Israel illegally and another 2 are in “administrative detention”, a process used exclusively for Palestinians in Israel which allows Israel to arrest and detain Palestinians without evidence, legal representation or charges for an indefinite period of time. (While the Israeli law states it is for a 6 months period, it can be extended indefinitely) without a crime ever having been committed on the basis that they suspect a crime might be committed or they might pose a threat to Israelis security at a later time.Statistics on Palestinian minors in the custody of Israeli security forcesIn total, as at the end of September 2020 of the 4184 Palestinian prisoners in Israel, 376 Palestinians were incarcerated under “administrative detention” for periods ranging from 6 months to 5 years without being charged of a crime.The use of Administrative detention laws was first introduced in the 80’s in response to the first intifada and it’s misuse did not come into prominence till 2011 when a Palestinian activist Khader Adnan detained under administrative detention for 12 months without charge went on a hunger strike for 55 days and made international headlines. This single event bought the misuse of administrative detention by Israel into the limelight. He was released before his strike became fatal to avoid international condemnation only to be re-arrested and detained months later.Khader Adnan - WikipediaHe has spent over 5 years of his life in Israeli prisons without charge.In the decades since its revival, Israel has used administrative detention to detain thousands of Palestinians and 9 Israelis.Under military rule, the IDF also conducts night raids on homes of Palestinians they want to detain. Often it’s to arrest children suspected of throwing stones..Applying the Law with a BiasSome laws that may be applicable to both Israelis and Palestinians are applied with vigor toward Palestinians and ignored or cushioned so much as to be ineffective when applied to Jewish Israelis.One example of this is laws that allow the demolition of Palestinian homes. While Palestinian homes are routinely destroyed or families evicted for a variety of reasons, including being built without Israeli building permits, not able to produce documents showing evidence of ownership, being absent from the property for a pre-determined length of time, being built on what is considered “state land”, being related to a terrorist, or simply being in the way of an Israeli settlement expansion, road project or to close to the what Israelis call the “security barrier” and Palestinians call the “Apartheid wall”. Over 1300 Palestinians homes have been estimated to have been demolished by Israel in the last decade in the West Bank with over 3500 people left homeless.Statistics on demolition of houses built without permits in East JerusalemPalestinian Communities Facing ExpulsionBy the same token, Israeli “Outposts” which are illegal under Israeli law and are the precursor to new settlements in the West Bank are ignored by the Israeli government or demolition orders not carried out for years, often even in spite of an Israeli court order to have the outposts dismantled.Israel’s High Court orders demolition of homes in outpost built on Palestinian landhttps://www.washingtonpost.com/world/middle_east/west-bank-outpost-at-center-of-israeli-battle-over-rule-of-law/2012/03/30/gIQASP3hkS_story.htmlSome of these laws (for example the absentee law) apply to only Palestinians, while others like “Obtaining a building permit”, or demolition of the family home of terrorists are only ever applied to Palestinians but are suppose to be administered to both equally.Israel's High Court turns down request to stop demolition of terrorists' homesThe rationale underlying the house-demolition policy is that would-be terrorists might not commit attacks if they know that their actions would cause suffering to people they loved and that the logic of the policy goes, family members of terrorists would be more keen to “keep an eye” on potential terrorists in order to avoid the demolition of the family house. These laws have been harshly criticized by many legal scholars in and outside Israel. The main criticism directed against the measure is that house demolitions constitute a form collective punishment forbidden both according to basic principles of human rights law and Articles 33 of the Fourth Geneva Convention of 1949 and Article 50 of the 1907 Hague Regulations. Others argue that house demolitions are discriminatory measures since they are used exclusively against Palestinians— never against Jews who committed acts of terrorism..impact of the racial bias in the Israeli legal system.So if a settler kid is throwing rocks at Palestinians, a phenomena that is not only common, but places like Hebron wire cages are erected in public places and around homes to safeguard people from just such an event,is seen doing so by an Israeli soldier, the soldier’s instructions are to do nothing. Should a Palestinian adult approach the kid, he is likely to be arrested by the soldier. The only people that have the ability to caution the Israeli settler are the Israeli police and by the time they are called, the incident is over. If evidence of the attack exists, in recent times the evidence has be “lost” while in the custody of the Israeli authorities and charges have been dropped.Lose the evidence, close the case twice: How a Palestinian's complaint was handledIf a Palestinian kid is suspected of throwing rocks, often at armoured vehicles or IDF soldiers using teargas and rubber bullets to disperse a Palestinian protest, or on occasions just because to exert authority, then the kid is arrested and detained immediatly. If a child is in the area when a protest has taken place, the IDF is able to arrest him just to obtain names of other kids that may have been present when the protest took place. Those names are then used to conduct night raids on the homes of the families and the kids taken away.Finally in the sentencing of Palestinians, we have already covered the regime of Administrative detention” but if you are fortunate enough to be granted “due process” under military rule and appear before a military court, convictions rates run at nearly 100% according to Haraatz a Jewish Israeli left wing media outlet.Separate and unequal: Inside Israel's military courts, where the only defendants are PalestiniansIn addition, compared to concivcted Israelis, sentences are harsh. Consider the soldier who was convicted of shooting an unarmed Palestinian boy at the Gaza protests last year. According to the NY Times “ sentenced to a month in military prison and demoted.”Israeli Soldier Gets One-Month Sentence Over Killing of Gaza Teenager (Published 2019)Contrast this to the well publicised case of Ahed Tamini the 16 year old girl who slapped a soldier just after hearing that her 15 year old cousin was shot in the head by an Israeli soldier,both she and her mother received an 8 month jail sentence as part of a plea deal without which she stood to serve 14 years in prison. Amnesty International has dubbed her the Rosa Parks of Palestine.What determines how you are treated by the Israeli legal system often comes down to a matter of a few hundred meters. Whether you were fortunate enough to be born to a Jewish family in an Israeli settlement or a Palestinian family, sometimes just a few hundred meters away.Many Israelis accuse Palestinians of being “brainwashed” by their leaders or their education system into hating Israel or Israelis. I would agree that many are brainwashed, not by the Palestinians but by Israeli themselves in the way it treats them while under occupation. Israel appears to be blind to it’s complicity in propagating the hate and ensuring the conflict continues from one generation to the next.

Are you confused about what you need in order to start a demolition project? In most cases, you’re going to need a demolition permit.It’s best to find out before starting the project whether the permit is something you’ll need to obtain. Fortunately, this article covers everything you need to know about demolition permits.What is a demolition permit?A demolition permit is a legal document that provides you with the right to demolish any structure that requires a building permit to construct. But just because a building permit was not acquired before construction does not mean you don’t need a demolition permit. If the structure was improperly built without obtaining a permit, you still have to get a permit to demolish it.If you’re working on more than one structure, you have to get a separate demolition permit for each one that requires demolition. A shed and detached garage on the same property, for instance, each requires their own demolition permit. So in that case, you would need to demolition permits.Depending on the area where you will be doing the demolition, various code provisions will specify permit requirements and the review process.When exactly do you need a demolition permit?You need a demolition permit when:A primary structure or structures will be razed or removed from a lot.Any accessory structures with utility systems, mechanical systems, hazardous materials, or a basement-type foundation will be raised or removed from a lot.A building that is having an addition renovation requires a substantial amount of demolition.Special considerationsSmaller residential structures that include four or fewer dwelling units typically require additional measures, including specific site control measures and potentially added inspections. You’ll also need an erosion control inspection for each permit you are issued. You will also need a tree preservation inspection prior to any demolition work if you are preserving trees on the site.What are the requirements of getting a demolition permit?In order to obtain a demolition permit you will need:A completed permit application.For many demolition projects, a grading plan—submitted and approved.A successfully completed and inspected plumbing permit.Depending on the municipality, a cash demolition escrow bond may be required to ensure the safe, sanitary, and secure completion of the demolition work. This bond is typically refundable at the end of demolition.Determine whether the proposed work is a demolition or a major alteration.You need a demolition permit only if the project is in fact a demolition project.These two types of work are very different from each other a demolition is defined by the removal of all exterior walls above the foundation. You may need to check your local code provisions to determine the definition of the word “wall” and to check on how you can determine if all exterior walls have been removed.A major alteration, on the other hand, involves removing at least 50% of the exterior walls above the foundation. Again, check your local code provisions to figure out whether your project meets the criteria for a major alteration.Make note, however, that if at any point your major alteration project becomes a demolition project according to code provisions, then you are required to stop your project and obtain a demolition permit before continuing work.Check for any ordinances that would require a demolition delay.In many places, the city codes surrounding demolition projects require a demolition delay in certain circumstances. The delay is there to ensure time for appropriate notices to be mailed and emailed to the appropriate organizations, and in some cases for appropriate signs to be placed on the properties prior to the beginning of demolition activity.This is especially likely in the case of single-family residential units.Check for appropriate site control measures that must be implemented.Many residential structures, or dwelling units, as well as their accessory structures, require site control measures for demolitions. These may include an asbestos survey, a demolition plan, documentation regarding lead paint certifications, documentation regarding certification for asbestos removal, removing exterior painted surfaces before mechanical demolition, implementing dust suppression measures mechanical demolition, agreements that demolition activities will be suspended if winds exceed a certain speed, and plans for demolition debris to be properly contained and covered on-site.Check for any deconstruction ordinance requirements.Many single-family dwelling structures, such as houses and duplexes, require a deconstruction ordinance if they meet certain criteria. This is often in the case that the structure is considered a historic building.In the case that the building is a historic resource, you may be required to have a certified deconstruction contractor safely disassemble the house in order to salvage valuable materials that can be reused. Additional permits for historic deconstruction will likely be required.Determine whether the soil will need to be compacted after demolition.After demolition, the site must be restored to a condition that is suitable for new construction. In some cases this means replacing the soil and then compacting it. Compacting is more likely to be necessary if the demolished building had a basement or foundation that resulted in the need for a large replacement fill.If this is the case, you will also need a soils special inspection, which must be completed by an independent agency. However, in some cases when a replacement structure is being constructed at the same time and the basement excavation will be reused, you may be able to disregard the compacted fill requirements if you sign an agreement that the excavation will get filled if the planned new construction does not occur.Check whether a sewer cap is required, or if there are any other utilities requirements.Different cities have different provisions regarding utilities. If a house that is being demolished is served by the city sewer, it may require a sewer To be placed during demolition. If the sanitary system was a septic tank or cesspool, you will likely need an inspection and decommissioning permit for the abandonment of the system.Make sure you get an intent to demolish form signed by all the property owners.Unless you are in fact the owner listed on the deed of the property, you’ll need to have this taken care of before any demolition work begins. If the property has multiple owners, you’ll need to make sure that the form is signed by each of them.Check the tree code requirements for the area.Before you can be issued a demolition permit, you will often need to provide tree preservation information. Those requirements will need to be completed within a certain amount of time before demolition, during the demolition delay period.Most municipalities will not approve the demolition permit until tree code requirements are met. This is important to know because not meeting tree code requirements could result in a delay in getting the permit issued.You do not need a demolition permit when:Removing small sheds, small garages, or other minor accessory structures that do not contain utilities with separate connections or basement-type foundations.Removing decks, porches, and other similar appendages to structures where the intent is to rebuild after removal.Performing interior demolition to a structure or structures, where the intent is to change or renovate the structure.Demolition grading plan requirements:As mentioned in the requirements for obtaining a demolition permit, a grading plan is required for many projects. The grading plan will need to be submitted for review, and will likely need to include, at the least, the following items:The property address and a legal description of the structure and property.Information regarding existing typography and boundaries.A description of basements or foundation locations that will be removed or filled.The proposed contours and elevations.Limits regarding the clearing and grading.A plan for control measures regarding erosion and sediment.And any other notes or items deemed necessary for demolition.This is not a complete list of grading plan requirements. Always check with the municipality where you will be completing the demolition.To summarize:A demolition permit is necessary to completely raze or remove a structure down to the foundation in most municipalities.You need a separate permit for each structure to be demolished.You fill out a permit application in order to start the process of obtaining the demolition permit.You will likely need to submit a demolition grading plan.You need to acquire plumbing permits for the demolition.Different types of structures will require various inspections and criteria to be met prior to being issued a demolition permit.Additional requirements may be present in the code provisions for various municipalities.

This makes him eligible under present politicised awards-Following is the text of the application filed before the Liberhan Commission of Inquiry, on behalf of Gauri Advani, for becoming a witness to bring out the truth of the Babri Masjid demolition before the Commission:Most respectfully showeth:1. That the applicant is a Hindu by religion.2. That the applicant got married on 12.10.1991 to Jayant Advani, son of L K Advani, the present home minister of India.3. That the applicant is currently pursuing her profession in law and is a practising solicitor in London.4. That the applicant has read in the newspapers that L K Advani, the current home minister of India was summoned and he had made a statement before this Hon'ble Commission. L K Advani has expressed his anguish at the demolition of Babri mosque and has denied any culpability or involvement in the demolition of Babri mosque.5. That the applicant submits that the statement made by L K Advani before this Hon'ble Commission is nothing but a bundle of lies based upon concocted and false facts. The applicant has the relevant and material information which would help this Hon'ble Commission to elicit the truth and unravel the controversy shrouding the demolition of Babri mosque.6. That the applicant got married in October 1991 became witness to the religious politics being played/advocated by Advani.7. That even prior to the marriage, the applicant had known L K Advani and his family. Right from November 1989 till her wedding in October 1991, the applicant had worked as Special Assistant with L K Advani and was looking after the New Delhi constituency from where L K Advani had contested and won the election. The applicant even used to go to the Parliament Secretariat alongwith Kamla Advani to help L K Advani in his parliamentary work. The applicant, at that time, had deep faith in the ideology which L K Advani used to propagate and bonafidely believed whatever Shri Advani used to tell her, as gospel truth.8. That soon after the marriage, the applicant came to know that L K Advani and his wife Kamla Advani and other family members do not follow the rites, rituals and ceremonies attached with Hinduism and are basically followers of the Sikh religion. Despite being a follower of the Sikh religion, L K Advani was using Hinduism to mobilise the Hindu vote bank. Hinduism was used to play with the sentiments of general Hindu masses in order to the garner support and the vote of the Hindu masses to enable the BJP to come in power at the Centre.9. That L K Advani, in the privacy of home had confided to the applicant on the occasion of Deepavali in 1991 that though he has no faith in Hinduism, but to maintain and appease the religious constituency of his Party, he had to keep this charade. He in fact, further informed the applicant that he has no "Gotra", but at the time of starting his rath yatra from Somnath in 1990, he had coined the Bhardwaj Brahmin Gotra to avoid embarrassment as the Pujaris in various temples en route to Ayodhya would have asked about his "Gotra" and Hindu connection.L K Advani told the applicant that this information about the Bhardwaj Gotra should remain secret and no one outside the family should come to know.10. That the fact that L K Advani had misled the general Hindu public by playing a fraud upon them by claiming to belong to Bhardwaj Gotra, came to the knowledge of the applicant only on Deepavali in 1991 though the applicant had also joined L K Advani for his rath yatra. Advani lied and misled the Hindu masses and the nation about his religious association in order to develop and nurture the vote bank of Hindus in favour of his Party.11. That on or around 28.11.1991, an application was moved in the Hon'ble Supreme Court seeking permission to carry out symbolic kar seva in Ayodhya. Anticipating favourable orders from the Hon'ble Supreme Court, L K Advani decided to start another rath yatra from Varanasi in eastern UP to mobilize kar sevaks for the kar seva. The applicant and Kamla Advani had accompanied L K Advani to Lucknow on 30.11.1992 morning when all of them left for Varanasi by North East Express from Delhi.12. That the applicant submits that L K Advani started his rath yatra on 1.12.1992 from Varanasi. Before the start of the Rath Yatra, Vinay Katiyar came to meet L K Advani. The applicant was also present in this meeting. It was in this meeting, L K Advani and Vinay Katiyar in the presence of the applicant, conspired to demolish the Babri mosque and discussed the details and finer aspects involved in the action plan to demolish the Babri mosque. L K Advani told Vinjay Katiyar that the ultimate aim of the rath yatra, which he had been undertaking right from 1990 and the build up to kar seva by mobilizing the Ram Bhakt Brick movement, is not only to do kar seva and appease Hindu sentiments but also to garner and muster votes and come to power at the Centre. L K Advani categorically linked religion, exploitation of Hindu sentiments and the opportunity to do the kar seva with the real aim of benefiting BJP politically by mustering the Hindu vote bank. He also discussed that in order to create a strong Hindu vote bank, which would vote for BJP, the time has come to encash the Hindu sentiments by carrying out the demolition of the Babri mosque. L K Advani told Vinay Katiyar that the movement to build a Ram Temple at Babri mosque had to be taken to its logical end, ie coming to power at the Centre and that would not be possible without demolishing the Babri mosque as that will unite the Hindu vote bank in favour of the BJP.13. While leaving to start the rath yatra, L K Advani told Vinay Katiyar that the right opportunity has come and since a large number of kar sevaks would be congregating in Ayodhya for kar seva, demolition can easily be done. The applicant remembers that L K Advani said, "Iska kaam kar do," then again said, "Kya Babri Masjid ka kalank nahin mit sakta" . Vinay Katiyar looked at the applicant and then said to L K Advani that "Ham to aapke aadesh ka intzar kar rahen hain, aur agar aap bole to masjid ka namo-nishaan mita de." L K Advani at that time smiled and then said "To intzar kis baat ka, kaam kar do, gulaami ke nishaan kab tak rahenge. Masjid ko dhawasth kar ke dikhao - sahi samay aa gaya hai."After this, L K Advani left the meeting to start the rath yatra. The applicant and Kamla Advani came back to Delhi.14. That the applicant was not surprised at this outpouring of L K Advani. Even at home, L K Advani and other family members used to say that the kar seva in Ayodhya would not remain restricted to "Bhajan or Kirtan" and we are not going to Ayodhya to only sing Bhajans. It was the common refrain during discussions at home that BJP can only come to power by playing the religion card. The Hindu vote bank has to be created and encashed for BJP to from the government at the Centre. L K Advani used to comment at home that the only possible way to achieve the above objective was by hoodwinking the Hindu masses and using Hindu sentiments to demolish the symbols of slavery and past Muslim domination.15. That after the demolition of Babri mosque, on his return home, when the applicant asked as to what had happened, L K Advani exulted "Jo karne gaye the, woh kar aye" and he expressed his happiness over the demolition.The applicant submits that L K Advani and Vinay Katiyar conspired together and are fully responsible for the demolition of the Babri mosque as it was they who not only instigated the Hindu masses to not restrict the symbolic kar seva to Bhajan and Kirtan but to demolish the Babri mosque. The said demolition was carried out with a view to capture power at the Centre for the BJP.16. That right after Somnath Yatra in 1990, during and after the demolition of the Babri mosque, L K Advani got various silver gifts in the form of Hindu Gods and Goddesses, swords and bricks from Hindu individuals, associations and temples. Since L K Advani and his family members do not follow Hinduism, all these silver items/gifts were melted in Bombay (with the help of Sarla Advani who is sister of Kamla Advani and lives in Bombay) to make silver utensils and cutlery items. L K Advani used to claim at home that he does not believe in Hindu Gods and Goddesses and keeping them at home serves no useful purpose. L K Advani therefore, decided to melt these gift items to use the silver to make the utensils and cutlery items. In fact, on many occasions, the applicant had with a heavy heart helped Kamla Advani in packing all these silver gift items associated with the Hindu religion in bags which Sarla Advani used to carry to Bombay by a train. She always used to travel by train because the baggage is not checked as it is done in the air journey.These silver utensils and cutlery items are being used in the house of L K Advani.17. That a big fraud has been perpetrated on this great Nation, Hindu masses and on this Hon'ble Commission by L K Advani. L K Advani and his family does not follow Hinduism and they did not permit the applicant to do Puja at home. In fact, in the privacy of L K Advani's home, Hinduism is ridiculed, scoffed and made fun of whereas in public L K Advani claims himself to be the guardian and symbol of Hinduism, as he did in the guise of Lord Rama on top of the Ram Rath. All these claims are false, bogus and fabricated to advance his political career by playing a fraud on the sentiments of Hindu masses and to hoodwink them into forming a vote bank which has been used by his party to come to power at the Centre.18. That the applicant shall make a detailed statement on this before this Hon'ble Commission, bringing out many other aspects not mentioned above as it is not possible to mention or enumerate all of them in writing. The applicant submits herself for examination by this Hon'ble Commission. In the facts and circumstances explained above, it is respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Commission be pleaseda. To summon the applicant to make her statement on oath and disclose the true and correct facts before this Hon'ble Commission to elicit the truth.b. Pass such order or further orders as this Hon'ble Commission may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.Signed(Mrs Gauri Advani)C-1/27, Pandara Park, New Delhi