Instruction To Send Duplicate Statements: Fill & Download for Free

You Don’t Have To Make An Affidavit, Newspaper Ad,Press Notification or Identification Certificate from gazetted Officer.This QUORA Question is about MARK-SHEET (Mark Statement). So let me give the correct instruction. I request others to delete their answer as there is too much misinformation (and nonsensical copy pastes)Download the form from http://cbse.nic.in/faq/dupform.pdf . Fill it up and dont forget to mention the amount you made a DD for.Make a demand draft from any Bank. The amount to be paid depends on how old your marksheets are. You can check it here: http://cbse.nic.in/faq/notice%20of%20fee%20revision_2016.pdf. (I lost my mark-sheet from 2001, so i had to pay Rs1000. But for most of you, who gave exams between 2014 to 2019, it will costs only Rs250) . The DD should be made in favor of SECRETARY CBSE and then mention the Regional Office.Mail the Form and the DD photocopy to your CBSE Regional Office , as mentioned in the last page of your application form.Extra info for people who passed before 2001If you mark sheet is from 2001 and before, then you have to send your documents and pay your demand draft to CBSE Regional Office, Ajmer Todarmal Marg, Ajmer. 305001 (Rajasthan) This is because really really old documents are handled by this office only. Other regional offices no longer handle really old documents.

You should have notified your former employer(s) of your new address when you moved. Since you did not do so prior to January 31st of this year, your former employers have already, as required by law, mailed your W-2 statements to your last known address. You will need to contact each of your former employers and ask them to send you a duplicate W-2 at your new address, or arrange to obtain a duplicate form by some other means, such as electronic delivery or fax.If you are not able to obtain a duplicate for a missing W-2 from a former employer by February 28th, you should contact the IRS to initiate the process for filing a substitute W-2 using Form 4852 (instructions at link). The IRS will reconcile the information you provide on the substitute W-2 you file with the W-2 originals that your employer filed with the Social Security Administration, when the IRS gets them from the SSA in or around August. If that reconciliation results in a discrepancy, the IRS will bill you for additional tax due, issue you a refund for overpayment, call you in for an examination, or call your former employer in for an examination, in whatever combination as seems appropriate to the IRS in the circumstances.

For small enough and simple enough programs, it will. For anything larger, it’s generally a terrible idea.I’m going to stick to C code for the moment. In C, the two biggest reasons I factor some code into a function are:I want to encapsulate a computation and give it a name, even if I only invoke that computation from one place.I need to perform the same action from multiple places in my code.I’m ignoring other reasons, such as callbacks and function pointers, or recursive functions. Let’s just focus on the bread and butter for a moment.For #1, if the computation really is invoked from one place, then it’s usually fairly trivial for the compiler to inline the function at that call site. There’s really no reason not to, at least in a optimized, non-debug build.#2 gets at the heart of the matter: I want to invoke this function from multiple places in my code.If I inline everything into main(), I need to inline every called function into every caller.This duplicates the function at every place it’s called. And, if it calls any functions, those must be inlined as well. This will result in massive duplication of code for most programs. Your instruction cache will hate you.And if you truly want to inline everything, you’ll need to bring in every support function in the standard library that your program calls.Let’s say your C program calls printf() from multiple places. The printf() implementation calls a number of other support functions to format integers, floating point numbers, strings, etc. And ultimately, it calls fwrite or equivalent to send out the write data. Under the hood, at least on *nix-like systems, fwrite eventually calls down to write, which then calls down to a system-call layer which ultimately sends the text out.If you inline everything, then a copy of all of this will get inlined into main() for every call to printf that was in your original program. This is not an insignificant amount of code!(And those who’ve implemented real-world C libraries know I’m leaving a number of usual layers out, as the printf() family functions share a lot of code through some indirection.)You might counter: “OK, leave the C standard library out, and only inline stuff I wrote.”Any decent sized C program will have other facilities with similar properties within their own code base. The call graph for a decent sized program won’t be a tree. Multiple functions will get called from multiple places. Higher level functions will call into shared lower-level functions.By inlining everything, you’ll lose that code reuse by replicating the code everywhere. That *THWUMP* sound you just heard is the size of your compiled program exploding.That’s just the bread and butter before we get to more interesting topics.Sometimes, the compiler don’t know what function will get called at compile time. C offers function pointers, and one purpose of function pointers is to allow you to decide, at run time, what function to call.The compiler may be able to compute a list of potential functions that might get called for every function pointer that gets used. But, if we’re inlining everything, the compiler is now in a sticky situation: It must allow for all of those candidates to get invoked wherever we invoke a function via a function pointer.Ouch. You’ve just dropped a potentially very large switch-case statement at every point in the program where you might invoke a function through a function pointer.It gets worse. Sometimes, the call graph has cycles, and sometimes those cycles involve function pointers. You may not be possible to know what path you take through a given set of functions until run time.A long time back, I wrote a state-machine based ANSI / VT-100 interpreter. Being clever, I put each state in its own function, and had each function set a pointer to the function for the next state in the state machine.You could implement that with something like this:struct interp_state; // forward decl.  typedef void interp_fxn(struct interp_state *s, char c);  struct interp_state {  interp_fxn *advance_state;  // other state details };  void update_interp(struct interp_state *s, char c) {  s->advance_state(s, c); } Now you have nothing to go on to flatten this out into a set of inline functions in main(). The ANSI / VT-100 interpreter had maybe a dozen state functions that’d get called in somewhat arbitrary order based on the input data.Sure, if the compiler is smart enough, it could reduce the interp_fxn pointer into a state number and replace s->advance_state(s, c) with a switch-case. But is it likely?The compiler will need to know that it’s seen the entire program (which, to be honest, is a given anyway for this exercise) to know it’s seen all possible values for s->advance_state. It’s a doable transformation, but a lot to ask. And if update_interp gets called from many places, that’s ripe for code bloat.But what about recursion?I’m actually less worried about recursion. There are mechanical transformations that can turn that into loops and an explicit stack. They may not be pretty loops, but it’s at least theoretically possible.But again, code bloat.What about C++?C++ adds its own challenges.Virtual method dispatch is essentially function-pointer dispatch. So, apply almost everything I said about function pointers to virtual method dispatch, except now with the additional twist of run-time dynamic types.Exceptions definitely get complicated, although you can probably transform those into appropriate goto in the flattened code.And… I’d expect even more significant code bloat.