I- 730 L: Fill & Download for Free

Depends on the implementation, of course.On my computerecho "#include <stdio.h>" | gcc -E - | wc -l 837 echo "#include <stdio.h>" | clang -E - | wc -l 730 echo "#include <stdio.h>" | icc -E - | wc -l 2353 On another:echo "#include <stdio.h>" | gcc -E - | wc -l 229 echo "#include <stdio.h>" | cc -E - | wc -l 632 On another:cl.exe /E /I..\include D:\test.c | wc -l Microsoft (R) C/C++ Optimizing Compiler Version 18.00.30723 for x86 Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. test.c 6517 etc...

A lithium ion battery has two electrodes, one of which is commonly made of carbon, the other of a metal oxide, and the electrolyte between is a lithium salt in an organic solvent.A lithium poly battery is a further development, and instead of using an organic solvent, it uses a polymer electrolyte gelled with conventional salts which remains a semi-solid.Interestingly, there is a fourth major component, separators, and in both cases these are polymers, usually polypropylene or polyethylene, so a lithium ion will have polymer parts but they’re completely passive.Energy densities are 250–730 Wh/L for a polymer, and 250–693 Wh/L for an ion according to the figures I’ve just looked at on Wikipedia. Polymers are more popular in small electronic devices as they’re easily formed into soft, flat and pouchy shapes.The big disadvantage is that it’s easy to make lithium go boom. Soft and pouchy polymers can suffer from compression, which degrades them, and all types can suffer from expansion due to overcharging, but without the rigid casing associated with ion batteries, the polymers can bulge alarmingly and rupture. (I’ve seen a battery in a Samsung phone “bloat” to such an extent that the cover bowed visibly. I quarantined it (it was a business phone) and carefully extracted the battery and SIM and put the latter in a new phone for the individual to use whilst the old went on test. It looked like the battery had gone bad rather than the phone or charger, so after a few hours in a “bucket” where it didn’t go boom I put the phone back in service).Here’s a bloat on a soft pack:This image comes from Lovephone, who specialise in i-Phones, but any device can suffer from this. Really, you shouldn’t charge it at less than 1 deg C, or more than 45, which isn’t usually a problem (some devices won’t let you). Overuse can cause it too; talking for hours or playing video games all day can do it sometimes.

The Army conducted thorough testing of Dragon Skin and found it to be inadequate and dangerous. The famous tests conducted by NBC News were not thorough and should not be seen as evidence.All information I post here is from the May 2006 Evaluation of Pinnacle Armor's SOV 3000 "Dragon Skin". The PDF can be found here: http://archive.defense.gov/DODCMSShare/briefingslide/304/070521-D-6570C-001.pdfPrior to testing, all ESAPI plates must go through a variety of extreme conditions (conditions that exist in the battlefield). This includes high temperatures (160+ F), low temperatures, (-60 F), diesel fuel, oil, and salt water immersion.The NBC News test did not treat the body armor to combat conditions. Because of this, their testing cannot be trusted. What the Army found, was that the individual Dragon Skin ceramic plates (the inserts that make up the "dragon skin" designed to stop rifle rounds) became ineffective after being subjected to those conditions. This happened because the ceramic plates are being held by an adhesive that fails in extreme conditions. In room temperature, this adhesive works well. However, when subjected to heat (120 F and 160 F), the adhesive fails. This adhesive fails in cold temperatures as well. (-60). In fact, it fails to such an extent that most ceramic plates fall to the bottom of the vest, thus exposing the vitals.In the ambient temperature test, the 2nd shot penetrated the front side. In the motor oil exposure test, two shots penetrated on the back and front. In the diesel fuel test, the front, back, and right side were penetrated. When the Dragon Skin armor was dropped (much like hitting the dirt), the first shot penetrated. In the high temperature test, all shots penetrated because the ceramic plates had detached and fallen to the bottom of the vest. This would not happen with the IBA or IOTV.Furthermore, an XL sized "Dragon Skin" is 47.5 pounds by itself. If you include ammunition, a weapon, NVGs, mission essential equipment, water, etc, the soldier would be over-encumbered. He or she would be carrying approximately 70 to 80 pounds of equipment. With a heavier weapon like an M249 or M240, this weight would increase further to 90 to 100 pounds. This is not including all equipment that would be carried in a ruck for extended missions. On the other hand, an L sized IOTV (the current body armor the Army is using) is approximately 35 pounds with all inserts. Both offer 730 square inches of protection. The IOTV is more reliable in combat conditions. It's also 12.5 pounds lighter (which is a significant amount of weight).Bottom line, "Dragon Skin" is unacceptable for combat.