Rd 1944 37: Fill & Download for Free

In the use of piston airplane airframes to create “semi-jet” aviation technology in the 40s of the last century, there is nothing unusual: the significance of the wing sweep and the airfoil shape were not obvious, the reasons for pulling aircraft at high speeds into a dive were based on conjectures. The answer to the question can be found by analyzing the stages of the formation of high-altitude and high-speed aviation, which used mixed-type power plants …(1) Motorjet-powered aircraft: airplanes with a motorjet engines in which the compressor turbine is driven by a piston engine. Motorjet engines provide greater thrust than a propeller alone mounted on a piston engine; this has been successfully demonstrated in a number of different aircraftFig. Coanda-1910 — the first jet propulsor for airplane(a) The first airplane with a motorjet engine was designed in 1910 by the Romanian engineer Henri CoandaClerget four-cylinder piston engine with 50 hp (1,000 rpm) was used to drive the compressor, which ensured the movement of the aircraft by creating a flow of air/ gases at the outlet. Air was pumped into two combustion chambers located on the sides of the fuselage, where it was mixed with fuel and burned. The only flight of the aircraft took place in October 1910 …Fig. The first jet aircraft with a turbojet engine made its flight on August 27, 1939. It was a German Heinkel He 178, equipped with a Heinkel HeS 3 engine with a thrust of 1,098 lbfIn 1931, engineer Secondo Campini founded a jet propulsion research company, and in 1939 he manufactured the power plant, which was installed on the Caproni Campini N.1 aircraft …(b) The first flying Caproni Campini N.1 was equipped with a motorjet engine operating on the principle of creating a jet thrustFig. World’s second jet aircraftThe all-metal monoplane was powered by a 900 hp Isotta-Fraschini L.121/ RC.40 piston engine installed in the front of the fuselage and driving a compressor that supplied compressed air to the combustion chamber, where air mixed with fuel, ignited, burned and expired through a jet nozzle (with a central body) of variable cross-sectional area. The engine provided the aircraft with a speed of 233 mph …The first flight of the aircraft took place on August 28, 1940. In the absence of interest from the official authorities, further work was stopped …Aircraft with motorjet engines were built in small series in the USSR …Fig. I-250/ MiG-13 fighterOn May 22, 1944, the development of the I-250 fighter with a power plant consisting of a piston (VK-107R) and an aerojet with a compressor (VRDK) engines began. In front of the fuselage there was a piston engine with a three-blade propeller. The engine was a modification of the VK-107A serial engine with a drive box for taking off power for rotation of the VRDK compressor. Under the piston engine, there was an air intake and a channel for supplying air to the VRDK. An axial compressor was located inside the channel. The combustion chamber was located behind the cockpit and ended in the tail section of the fuselage with a jet shutter-controlled nozzle. Gasoline served as fuel for both engines. The power of the VK-107R engine was 1,650 hp. The shaft, through a gearbox with a clutch, drove a two-stage axial compressor into rotation. The VRDK thrust power was 900 hp …The first flight on a fighter took place on March 3, 1945. In March 1945, in one of its flights, the I-250 at an altitude of 25,591 ft reached a speed of 513 mph …(c) The speed of the I-250 was 93–109 mph higher than the speed of the domestic production Yak and La fighters and by 19 mph — the fastest at that time, the experimental La-7R with an auxiliary Liquid Propellant Rocket Engine (LPRE)In May 1948, the I-250 under the designation MiG-13 was put into service. By the beginning of the 50s the production of modern jet fighters began in the USSR so the MiG-13 aircraft were withdrawn from service …(2) Aircraft with auxiliary jet engines: aircraft with main piston engines and ramjets/ LPREs used as boostersAuxiliary ramjet engines temporarily increase the aircraft's flight characteristics — speed and ceiling. In cruise flight, ramjet engines are not used. A ramjet engine has a number of advantages over a LPRE: less time to prepare for flight; work on the same fuel as the main engine; absence of aggressive components on board; multiple switching on and off in flight …Fig. The acceptance into service of the MiG-15 jet fighters led to the need to increase the flight speed of the B-36 bombers — to increase their survivability. The solution (starting with B-36D, 1949) was to install, in addition to piston engines, turbojets — J47-GE-19, which were used for takeoff and high-speed flight. As a result, the speed increased by 56 mph. The installation of additional turbojet engines improved the takeoff characteristics of the aircraft — the takeoff run decreased by almost 1,640 ft; and the rate of climb increased by more than 7 ft/s(d) The La-138 aircraft was created on the basis of the La-9 serial fighter and was equipped with two auxiliary ramjet engines, each of which was attached under the wing on three adjustable nodesFig. La-138, La-9 top leftThe power plant (an ASh-82FN piston engine with a capacity of 1,850 hp and two ramjet engines with a thrust of 948 lbf each) provided the aircraft with a speed of 472 mph, a flight range of 777 mi …Reliable operation of the ramjet engine was provided only at altitudes up to 9,843 ft, where the speed increase in relation to the serial La-9 was 37 mph. Due to the low reliability of the ramjet engine, work on the aircraft was suspended, for good …(3) Mixed-power aircraft: aircraft with piston engines as main and turbojet engines as additionalPreliminary calculations showed that a purely jet aircraft of the early 40s will have a long takeoff distance, low rate of climb and flight range. The resource of the first jet engines was small. So, the idea to create an airplane with a mixed power plant appeared …(e) The specification provided for the installation of a piston engine on the aircraft, on which takeoff, cruise flight and landing were to be carried out, and a jet engine used only in combat modesThe California firm Ryan Aeronautical won the competition in January 1943 and in February received an order for the construction of three prototypes of the fighter that designated XFR-1 …Fig. The Ryan FR FireballOn December 2, 1943, an order was received for the construction of 100 aircraft, named FR-1 Fireball. On June 25, 1944, the first prototype took off; instead of a jet engine, its weight analogue was installed …The Fireball was an all-metal low-wing monoplane with a mixed/ combined power plant. A nine-cylinder Wright R-1820-72W Cyclone piston engine; 1,425 hp; with a three-blade all-metal variable-pitch propeller was installed in the nose of the fuselage. In the tail section — General Electric J-31-GE-3 turbojet engine with a thrust of 1,598 lbf. The engines shared a common fuel system. The turbojet engine had three attachment points, after the release of which the engine could be extended along the monorail, which passed in the upper part of the fuselage. Complete jet engine replacement took no more than four hours …(f) Engines had separate cranking panels and throttle control levers. The propeller pitch control system automatically changed the blade angle depending on the thrust of the turbojet engineThe turbojet engine air intakes were located in the forward wing root part …Maximum aircraft speed: without turbojet engine — 295 mph, with turbojet engine — 426 mph, flight range — 994 mi, service ceiling — 42,979 ft …After the victory over Japan, the need for a large number of fighters disappeared, and the prospects of jet aviation became obvious. FR-1 serial production was stopped …(g) On September 26, 1945, FR-1 performed a single turbojet flight with a feathered propellerFig. Fireball traps on board the carrier USS Ranger (CV-4), May 1945. Top right the de Havilland Vampire(h) On November 6, 1945, one of the fighters had a piston engine failure. The pilot launched the turbojet engine and made the world's first jet landing on the deck. This happened a month before the British tested the carrier-based fighter Sea VampireIn February–April 1948, all aircraft were put into reserve …(4) Turbojet-powered aircraftFig. The development of the Yak-15 fighter pursued several goals: the creation of an aircraft in the shortest possible time; the ability to quickly master it in mass use; overcoming the habit of pilots to a new type of technology. The Yak-3 fighter was taken as a basis. On it, the VK piston engine was replaced by an axial compressor turbojet engine installed in the fuselage nose, under the wing and the cockpit, with a jet nozzle outlet in the aft fuselage. The cockpit was retained in size and equipment — the pilot felt familiar, retrained easily (top down: Yak-3; Yak-15; RD-10/ Jumo 004 turbojet engine)The development of the I-300 fighter began in February 1945. On April 24, 1946, the prototype I-300 (F) performed its first flight. The power plant of the aircraft consisted of two RD-20 turbojet engines (a copy of the captured BMW-003) with a thrust of 1,764 lbf each. The jet nozzle of the engine was equipped with a central body that moved stepwise upon reaching an altitude of 26,247 ft. Kerosene was used as fuel. A piston engine running on gasoline was used to start the engines …I-300 is a classic cantilever mid-wing monoplane. The engines layout led to a decrease in the drag of the I-300 in comparison with the Me-262 — the speed of the I-300 increased by 22 mph. The I-300 was inferior only in-flight range …In January 1948, the fighter was put into service, designating the MiG-9 …Fig. I-300/ MiG-9 — the first Soviet turbojet fighter to takeoffEngines BMW-003 were mass-produced at the Kazan plant and were named: RD-20 (with a thrust of 1,764 lbf; for I-300, MiG-9, I-301T aircraft); RD-20F (with a thrust of 2,205 lbf); RD-21 (with a thrust of 2,315 lbf; for the MiG-9M aircraft) …The deepest modification of the fighter was the I-308 (FR), prepared for serial production and receiving the MiG-9M index. The first flight took place in July 1947 …(i) The RD-21 engines, combined with improved aerodynamics, made it possible to increase the maximum horizontal flight speed to 600 mph, and vertical near the ground — to 92 ft/s. The service ceiling has reached 45,932 ftIn 1948, with the MiG-15 production start, the production of the MiG-9 was limited …SummaryThe life of “semi-jet” aviation turned out to be short-lived — the 40s last century. It was, for the most part, research work: many unfinished projects, the construction of aircraft in small series, operation for 1–2 yearsEveryone understood that the winner would be the one who flies faster. Nobody tried to change the airplane's airframe. The solution was seen in improving the aircraft power plantIn a short struggle, aircraft with a motorjet power plant, which had a speed of about 200 mph, by the mid-40s were supplanted by a mixed-power aircraft, flying at a speed of more than 400 mph, until by the end of the decade the first-borns of turbojet technologies took the dominant position, overcoming speeds of over 600 mphIt took a decade for the turbojet engine to go from the first low-reliability samples to auxiliary/ additional engines of the aircraft power plant, and as they improved, they became the main aircraft enginesLater, with an increase in speeds to the limiting values, the airframe will be refined: changing the sweep of the wing, using new airfoils, compensating for the displacement of the wing aerodynamic center, automating control processes … But that will be later …

Not so long ago, I read of a Filipino single parent who left her two young daughters in the grandmother's charge whilst she went to an Arab country to work in order to lift her family out of poverty. When the grandmother was indisposed, a neighbour came and sexually molested the two pre-pubescent girls. On hearing this, the mother went into a deep depression; her anxiety was intensified in the knowledge that she could not afford the flight home to comfort and protect her children from further violation.There is a profound question each one of us must ask about this : was this man just “dancing to his DNA?” If so, who can point a finger? After all, if subjective morality does not exist, we each choose our own ethical code. Viva la permissive universe you could say. Besides, the man who raped the children, was he not propagating his evolutionary right to leave his seed and flourish the species?However, maybe, just maybe, when you read of the Filipino woman’s sad plight you were moved with a profound sense of injustice. “Injustice”, this is an interesting way of describing it. Where does that sense of injustice emerge from? It is as mysterious as the laws that govern nature. C. S. Lewis put it this way: “How could I know injustice if I didn’t know justice; how could I know a straight line if I did not know a crooked line?” In other words, how can we know morality unless there is a standard beyond us? If you say something is wicked, you imply there is good. Where does this moral code have its roots? In truth, subjective morality, like the laws of mathematics and logic is deeply woven into the fabric of the universe.The Bible tells us that they are “laws written in our hearts.” After all, objective morality and justice in an atheistic world are arbitrary terms. However, atheists like to have their cake and eat it. Consider a radio interview where Dawkins, a scientist discusses this in the shallowest of terms:JB: But when you make a value judgement don't you immediately step yourself outside of this evolutionary process and say the reason this is good is because it's good, and you don't have any way to stand on that statement?RD: But my value judgement itself could come from my evolutionary past.JB: So, therefore, it's just as random in a sense as any product of evolution.RD: Well, you could say that. But it doesn't in any case - nothing about it makes it more probable that there is anything supernatural.JB: Okay, but ultimately, your belief that rape is wrong is as arbitrary as the fact that we've evolved five fingers rather than six.RD: You could say that, yeah.The interview implies that? Dawkins thinks that raping a child is as arbitrary as evolving five fingers, rather than six. Do you think raping a child is as arbitrary as just… let’s say, being unfashionable? That’s subjective morality. However, perhaps you agree that our sense of morality and justice comes from a source deeper than human mores.In Nietzsche’s Parable of The Madman, Nietzsche prophesised the end result of rejecting subjective morality:“”The madman jumped into their midst and pierced them with his eyes. "Whither is God?" he cried; "I will tell you. We have killed him -- you and I. All of us are his murderers. But how did we do this? How could we drink up the sea? Who gave us the sponge to wipe away the entire horizon? What were we doing when we unchained this earth from its sun? Whither is it moving now? Whither are we moving? Away from all suns? Are we not plunging continually? Backward, sideward, forward, in all directions? Is there still any up or down? Are we not straying, as through an infinite nothing? Do we not feel the breath of empty space? Has it not become colder? Is not night continually closing in on us? Do we not need to light lanterns in the morning? Do we hear nothing as yet of the noise of the gravediggers who are burying God? Do we smell nothing as yet of the divine decomposition? Gods, too, decompose. God is dead. God remains dead. And we have killed him.How shall we comfort ourselves, the murderers of all murderers? What was holiest and mightiest of all that the world has yet owned has bled to death under our knives: who will wipe this blood off us? What water is there for us to clean ourselves? What festivals of atonement, what sacred games shall we have to invent? Is not the greatness of this deed too great for us? Must we ourselves not become gods simply to appear worthy of it? There has never been a greater deed; and whoever is born after us -- for the sake of this deed he will belong to a higher history than all history hitherto."Here the madman fell silent and looked again at his listeners; and they, too, were silent and stared at him in astonishment. At last he threw his lantern on the ground, and it broke into pieces and went out. "I have come too early," he said then; "my time is not yet. This tremendous event is still on its way, still wandering; it has not yet reached the ears of men. Lightning and thunder require time; the light of the stars requires time; deeds, though done, still require time to be seen and heard. This deed is still more distant from them than most distant stars -- and yet they have done it themselves.””Here Nietzsche confronts the existential reality: a world spun out of control by the abandonment of a higher moralitySome argue that our morals come from an evolutionary distilled wisdom that tribal sages have honed over the ages as a survival mechanism-This is confusing survival with an objective preference, not a subjective moral code. But, and it’s a big “but”, if this were true, we would see great strides of progress as intelligent man syphons out all the unethical dross. However, atheism started to emerge in the 19th Century and lo and behold, the 20th Century was the bloodiest period in modern history (see chart at end). Just look at modern Jerusalem; two groups with opposing world views that have being going on for six thousand years, one group with a world view of unforgiveness. How to you stand in a room and arbitrate two opposing world views like this? Let me put it this way, if heavenly wisdom does not curb evil, what chance does subjective morality have? Yes, you do not need to be a believer to be good, but I still like to lock my doors at night.For the dear Filipino woman, there is a justice; a justice based on the morals of a great lawgiver, “The religion our God and Father accepts as pure and faultless is this: to look after orphans and widows in their distress…” James 1:27Dawkins on rapeExcess deaths caused by modern warfareFirst World War (1914–18): . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 million.Russian Civil War (1917–22): . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 millionSoviet Union, Stalin’s regime (1924–53): . . . . . . . . . 20 millionSecond World War (1937–45): . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 millionChinese Civil War (1945–49): . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.5 millionMao Zedong’s regime (1949–75): . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .40 millionTibet (1950 et seq.): . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .600,000Congo Free State (1886–1908): . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 millionMexico (1910–20): . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 millionTurkish massacres of Armenians (1915–23): . . . . . 1.5 millionChina (1917–28): . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 800,000China, Nationalist era (1928–37): . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.1 millionKorean War (1950–53): . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.8 millionNorth Korea (1948 et seq.): . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 millionRwanda and Burundi (1959–95): . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.35 millionSecond Indochina War (1960–75): . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.5 millionEthiopia (1962–92): . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 400,000Nigeria (1966–70): . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 millionBangladesh (1971): . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.25 millionCambodia, Khmer Rouge (1975–78): . . . . . . . . . . . 1.65 millionMozambique (1975–92): . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 millionAfghanistan (1979–2001): . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.8 millionIran–Iraq War (1980–88): . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 millionSudan (1983 et seq.): . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.9 millionKinshasa, Congo (1998 et seq.): . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.8 millionPhilippines Insurgency (1899–1902): . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 220,000Brazil (1900 et seq.): . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 500,000Amazonia (1900–1912): . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 250,000 Portuguese colonies (1900–1925): . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 325,000French colonies (1900–1940): . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200,000 Japanese War (1904–5): . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130,000German East Africa (1905–7): . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 175,000Libya (1911–31): . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 125,000Balkan Wars (1912–13): . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 140,000Greco–Turkish War (1919–22): . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 250,000Spanish Civil War (1936–39): . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 365,000Franco Regime (1939–75): . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100,000Abyssinian Conquest (1935–41): . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 400,000Finnish War (1939–40): . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150,000Greek Civil War (1943–49): . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 158,000Yugoslavia, Tito’s regime (1944–80): . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200,000First Indochina War (1945–54): . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 400,000Colombia (1946–58): . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200,000India (1947): . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 500,000Romania (1948–89): . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150,000Burma/Myanmar (1948 et seq.): . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130,000Algeria (1954–62): . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 537,000Sudan (1955–72): . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 500,000Guatemala (1960–96): . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200,000Indonesia (1965–66): . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 400,000Uganda, Idi Amin’s regime (1972–79): . . . . . . . . . . . . . 300,000Vietnam, postwar (1975 et seq.): . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 430,000Angola (1975–2002): . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 550,000East Timor, conquest by Indonesia (1975–99): . . . . . 200,000Lebanon (1975–90): . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150,000Cambodian Civil War (1978–91): . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 225,000Iraq, Saddam Hussein (1979–2003): . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 300,000Uganda (1979–86): . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 300,000Kurdistan (1980s, 1990s): . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 300,000Liberia (1989–97): . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150,000Iraq (1990– ): . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 350,000Bosnia and Herzegovina (1992–95): . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 175,000Somalia (1991 et seq.): . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 400,000The Devil’s Delusion, pp. 22–25

Who told you that? There are hundreds. Possibly thousands.Haber P, Moro PL, Ng C, Dores GM, Perez-Vilar S, Marquez PL, Cano M. Safety review of tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, acellular pertussis vaccines (Tdap) in adults aged ≥ 65 years, Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), United States, September 2010 – December 2018.external iconVaccine.. 2020 Feb 5;38(6):1476-1480. Epub 2019 Dec 28.Li R, Stewart B, Rose C. A Bayesian approach to sequential analysis in post-licensure vaccine safety surveillance.external iconPharm Stat. 2019 Dec 22. Epub ahead of printSu JR, Haber P, Ng CS, Marquez PL, Dores GM, Perez-Vilar S, Cano MV. Erythema multiforme, Stevens Johnson syndrome, and toxic epidermal necrolysis reported after vaccination, 1999-2017.external iconVaccine. 2019 Dec 20. pii: S0264-410X(19) 31670-6. Epub ahead of print.Yu W, Zheng C, Xie F, Chen W, Mercado C, Sy LS, Qian L, Glenn S, Tseng HF, Lee G, Duffy J, McNeil MM, Daley MF, Crane B, McLean HQ, Jackson LA, Jacobsen SJ. The use of natural language processing to identify vaccine-related anaphylaxis at five health care systems in the Vaccine Safety Datalink.external iconPharmacoepidemiolo Drug Saf. 2019 Dec 3. Epub ahead of print.Hibbs BF, Ng CS, Museru O, Moro PL, Marquez P, Woo EJ, Cano MV, Shimabukuro TT. Reports of atypical shoulder pain and dysfunction following inactivated influenza vaccine, Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), 2010-2017.external iconVaccine. 2020 Jan 29;38(5):1137-1143. Epub 2019 Nov 26.Donahue JG, Kieke BA, Lewis EM, Weintraub ES, Hanson KE, McClure DL, Vickers ER, Gee J, Daley MF, Destefano F, Hechter RC, Jackson LA, Klein NP, Naleway AL, Nelson JC, Belongia EA. Near Real-Time Surveillance to Assess the Safety of the 9-valent Human Papillomavirus Vaccine.external iconPediatrics. 2019 Dec; 144(6): e20191808. Epub 2019 Nov 18.Shimabukuro TT, Su JR, Marquez PL, Mba-Jonas A, Arana JE, Cano MV. Safety of the 9-Valent Human Papillomavirus Vaccine.external iconPediatrics 2019 Dec; 144(6). pii: e20191791. Epub 2019 Nov 18.Moro PL, McNeil MM. Challenges in evaluating post-licensure vaccine safety: observations from the Center for Disease Control and Prevention.external iconExpert Rev Vaccines. 2019 Oct; 18(10): 1091-1101 Epub 2019 Oct 19.Groom HC, Smith N, Irving SA, Koppolu P, Vazquez-Benitez G, Kharbanda EO, Daley MF, Donahue JG, Getahun D, Jackson LA, Klein NP, McCarthy NL, Nordin JD, Panagiotakopoulos L, Naleway AL. Uptake and safety of hepatitis A vaccination during pregnancy: A Vaccine Safety Datalink study.external iconVaccine. 2019 Oct 16;37(44):6648-6655. Epub 2019 Sep 20.McNeil MM, Paradowska-Stankiewicz I, Miller ER, Marquez PL, Seshadri S, Collins LC Jr, Cano MV. Adverse events following adenovirus type 4 and type 7 vaccine, live, oral in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), United States, October 2011-July 2018.external iconVaccine. 2019 Oct 16; 37(44): 6760-6767 Epub 2019 Sep 20.Donahue JG, Kieke BA, King JP, Mascola MA, Shimabukuro TT, DeStefano F, Hanson KE, McClure DL, Olaiya O, Glanz JM, Hechter RC, Irving SA, Jackson LA, Klein NP, Naleway AL, Weintraub ES, Belongia EA. Inactivated influenza vaccine and spontaneous abortion in the Vaccine Safety Datalink in 2012-13, 2013-14, and 2014-15.external iconVaccine. 2019 Oct 16;37(44):6673-6681. Epub 2019 Sep 17.Kochhar S, Excler JL, Bok K, Gurwith M, McNeil MM, Seligman SJ, Khuri-Bulos N, Klug B, Laderoute M, Robertson JS, Singh V, Brighton Collaboration Viral Vector Vaccines Safety Working Group (V3SWG). Defining the Interval for Monitoring Potential Adverse Events Following Immunization (AEFIs) After Receipt of Live Viral Vectored Vaccines.external iconVaccine. 2019 Sep 10;37(38): 5796-5802.Christianson MS, Wodi P, Talaat K, Halsey N. Primary Ovarian Insufficiency and Human Papilloma Virus Vaccines: A Review of the Current Evidence.external iconAm J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Aug 31. Epub ahead of print.DeStefano F, Monk Bodenstab H, Offit PA. Principal Controversies in Vaccine Safety in the United States.external iconClin Infect Dis. 2019 Aug 1;69(4):726-731.McNeil MM. Vaccine-Associated Anaphylaxis.external iconCurr Treat Options Allergy. 2019 Sep; 6(3): 297-308. Epub 2019 Jul 16.Edwards K, Hanquet G, Black S, Mignot E, Jankosky C, Shimabukuro T, Miller E, Nohynek H, Neels P. Meeting Report Narcolepsy and Pandemic Influenza Vaccination: What We Know and What We Need to Know Before the Next Pandemic? A Report From the 2nd IABS Meeting.external iconBiologicals. 2019 Jul;60:1-7.Hesse EM, Hibbs BF, Cano MV. Notes from the Field: Administration of Expired Injectable Influenza Vaccines Reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System — United States, July 2018–March 2019.external iconMMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019; 68: 529–530. 2019 June 14.Weinmann S, Naleway AL, Koppolu P, Baxter R, Belongia EA, Hambidge SJ, Irving SA, Jackson ML, Lewin B, Liles E, Marin M, Smith N, Weintraub E, Chun C. Incidence of Herpes Zoster Among Children: 2003-2014.external iconPediatrics. 2019 Jul; 144(1). Pii: e20182917. Epub 2019 Jun 10.Moro PL, Arana J, Marquez PL, Ng C, Barash F, Hibbs BF, Cano M. Is there any harm in administering extra-doses of vaccine to a person? Excess doses of vaccine reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), 2007-2017.external iconVaccine. 2019 Jun 19; 37(28): 3730-3734. Epub 2019 May 30.Hanson KE, McLean HQ, Belongia EA, Stokley S, McNeil MM, Gee J, VanWormer JJ. Sociodemopgrahic and clinical correlates of human papillomavirus vaccine attitudes and receipt among Wisconsin adolescentsexternal icon. Papillomavirus Res. 2019 Dec; 8: 100168; Epub 2019 May 25.Kochhar S, Edwards KM, Ropero Alvarez AM, Moro PL, Ortiz JR. Introduction of new vaccines for immunization in pregnancy – Programmatic, regulatory, safety and ethical considerationsexternal icon. Vaccine. 2019 May 31; 37(25): 3267-3277. Epub 2019 May 6.Hechter RC, Qian L, Tartof SY, Sy LS, Klein NP, Weintraub E, Mercado C, Naleway A, McLean HQ, Jacobsen SJ. Vaccine safety in HIV-infected adults within the Vaccine Safety Datalink Projectexternal icon. Vaccine. 2019 May 31; 37(25): 3296-3302. Epub 2019 May 4.Cook AJ, Wellman RD, Marsh T, Shoaibi A, Tiwari R, Nguyen M, Boudreau D, Weintraub ES, Jackson L, Nelson JS. Applying sequential surveillance methods that use regression adjustment or weighting to control confounding in a multisite, rare-event, distributed setting: Part 2 in-depth example of a reanalysis of the measles-mumps-rubella-varicella combination vaccine and seizure risk.external iconJ Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Sep; 113: 114-122. Epub 2019 May 2.DeStefano F, Shimabukuro TT. The MMR Vaccine and Autism.external iconAnnu Rev Virol. 2019 Sep; 6. Epub 2019 Apr 15.Zheng C, Yu W, Xie F, Chen W, Mercado C, Sy LS, Qian L, Glenn S, Lee G, Tseng HF, Duffy J, Jackson LA, Daley MF, Crane B, McLean HQ, Jacobsen SJ. The use of natural language processing to identify Tdap-related local reactions at five health care systems in the Vaccine Safety Datalinkexternal icon, International Journal of Medical Informatics, 2019 Jul; 127(1386-5056): 27-34. Epub 2019 Apr 13.Myers TR, McCarthy NL, Panagiotakopoulos L, Omer SB. Estimation of the Incidence of Guillain-Barré Syndrome During Pregnancy in the United Statesexternal icon. Open Forum Infectious Diseases. 2019 Mar; 6(3): ofz071.Klein NP, Goddard K, Lewis E, Ross P, Gee J, DeStefano F, Baxter R. Long term risk of developing type 1 diabetes after HPV vaccination in males and females.external iconVaccine. 2019 Mar 28; 37(14):1938-1944. Epub 2019 Mar 1.Haber P, Moro PL, Ng C, Dores GM, Lewis P, Cano M. Post-licensure surveillance of trivalent adjuvanted influenza vaccine (aIIV3; Fluad), Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), United States, July 2016-June 2018.external iconVaccine. 2019 Mar 7;37(11):1516-1520. Epub 2019 Feb 7.Hesse EM, Shimabukuro TT, Su JR, et al. Postlicensure Safety Surveillance of Recombinant Zoster Vaccine (Shingrix) — United States, October 2017–June 2018. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019 Feb 1; 68(4):91–94.Landazabal CS, Moro PL, Lewis P, Omer SB. Safety of 9-valent human papillomavirus vaccine administration among pregnant women: Adverse event reports in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), 2014-2017external icon. Vaccine. 2019 Feb 21; 37(9):1229-1234. Epub 2019 Jan 16.Su JR, Moro PL, Ng CS, Lewis PW, Said MA, Cano MV. Anaphylaxis after vaccination reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, 1990-2016.external iconJ Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019 Apr; 143(4):1465-1473. Epub 2019 Jan 14.Tartof SY, Qian L, Liu IA, Tseng HF, Sy LS, Hechter RC, Lewin BJ, Jacobsen SJ. Safety of Influenza Vaccination Administered During Hospitalizationexternal icon. Mayo Clin Proc. 2019 Mar; 94(3):397-407. Epub 2019 Jan 8.That’s just 2019. You can find more at the source: Vaccine Safety Publications