On The Use Of The Eos: Fill & Download for Free

You all know the EOS lip balm right? You know, the ones that come in colourful and cute little egg-shaped containers?Well, a couple days ago, I was scrolling through the Instagram page for the eos company and went on a post. Just as I was about to click out of the post, the comment section caught my attention. Unfortunately, I didn’t have in mind for writing this answer at that time, so I didn’t screenshot it. But some of the comments went like this:Such a waste of money, their product makes your lips chapped more instead of smoothI have decided to sue eos for their terrible product….after one use, my lips became all rashed and redI think you get the idea. The comment section was filled with complaints against eos and their product. At first, I was confused, eos was such a popular company with so many celebrities all using it…even I use it.But then, I realized how correct people were from the comment section. When I bought my first ever eos, I tried it, and fell in love……with the scent. The whole moisturization part? Meh, it was moisturizing at first , but then later on, about half an hour or so in, your lips mysteriously become chapped. Not super chapped, but chapped enough that you feel like you need to re-apply.A woman named Rachel Cronin sued the company due to what happened to her lips after applying eos:Cronin's lips began cracking on the edges and, by the next day, the surrounding skin had "severe blistering and rashes causing her to seek medical care.The company’s response? Well, they claimed that their products were 99% natural, organic, and gluten free. On Wednesday afternoon EOS Products tweeted its reaction to the suit.The eos lip balms make your lips chapped because of the ingredients that go in to creating that aroma when you use it. But I would really prefer having no scent and soft lips over scent and chapped lips.All my friends who’ve used eos (basically everyone) all didn’t favour eos as much. They all had experiences of having worsen chapped lips after using it. But hey, this was only a small minority of people’s opinions gathered into one answer. No hate to the eos company, but wouldn’t consider purchasing again.Thanks for reading my “product review” :)

I used to have to argue this on social media during the Obama years because there were just a ton of people under the impression it was Obama.Not like Anthony Zarrella's typical criticism which is more about the WAY President Obama used executive orders; there were just a ton of people who actually thought Obama was running around tossing EOs out like candy.Oddly, now when I hear this kind of thing, it’s normally people under the impression that Trump has signed a historic number. (He hasn’t.)Obama actually issued fewer EOs per year than any President since Grover Cleveland's first non-consecutive Term, 1885–1889.Not that it actually matters. Most people who complain about EOs don't really understand what they are: directives to the departments of the Executive Branch of the government which report directly to the President.The undisputed king of the EO was FDR. Roosevelt signed 3,721 Executive Orders, 307 per year he was in office.By contrast, Obama signed 35 per year. Trump has signed 51 per year, George W 36.In my lifetime, Carter had the highest average, 80. No one else since Truman's 115 per year had a higher average than JFK’s 75.Executive Orders

What would be the point? The only one that is really controversial is the payroll tax cut. If you challenge them you are taking relief away from people purely out of spite for the President and have to admit that the only reason for the challenge is that the EOs deprive Democrats of a bit of leverage.The whole point was that Pelosi and Schumer were not going to budge on anything because if nothing got done they could blame Trump and Republicans as the party and President of “no!”Nancy and Chuck can go on and on about how they were ready to negotiate but they never had any intention of doing so. This whole we offered to drop a trillion if they would add a trillion was never meant to be accepted and they know that.Trump just flipped the script and now Nancy is scrambling. Nancy is running around saying the EOs don’t provide for this or that, they are unconstitutional, we need money for this etc. The problem she now has and did not address is that all those other things she is talking about can still be negotiated. Everything in the EOs can still be negotiated. Congress is not bound to them case closed.What Democrats are having a raging fit about is that Trump just erased a bit of leverage she thought she could use to get all of her demands met. It doesn’t really matter a whole lot if the EOs are unconstitutional. If they are challenged and maybe have an injunction placed on them Democrats still lose because people will have to sit and wait for negotiations to happen and Democrats would be the ones that took the bread from their childrens’ mouths while everyone waits.McConnell would come out everyday after a challenge and say that if not for the challenge to these orders people that need help the most would have atleast some relief until we in Congress come up with a more comprehensive deal. Instead they put a stop to the Presidents appeal to compassion just so they could leverage suffering.