Enter Only One Tax: Fill & Download for Free

Yes.We feel hygienic enough to go to work.~ To exercise~ To dance~ to cook~ to nurse a child~ to have sexHowever, OP here is not understanding a fundamental question.It’s not about how “pure” (or hygienic, to use your word) we or you or god’s other followers feel.It’s about the fact that temples are public places and not allowing women to enter “public places” maintained by the government to whom everyone pays taxes, is discrimination based on sex.There is no rational nexus between women menstruating and women by law not being allowed inside the temple. Yes, the temple. It’s only one enforcing this hogwash.About someone entering temples with pee or excreta in their pants, the same logic wouldn’t apply.Because, men peeing or having excreta in their pants do not constitute a “class”. Women on the other hand constitute a “class” of people.And as per the Constitution of India, you cannot discriminate like that against a class.Yes, I did not fall for your bait of trying to separate between blood, piss and excreta. Because that is not the effing point.

I call Mr. Atal Bihari Vajpayee one of the best PMs of the country. In fact, to call anyone the best will be doing injustice to some equally competent people who worked in their circumstances in the best interest of the nation.I rate Atalji as one of the best for the following reasons.Atalji successfully dismantled the all important PMO, done so from the time of Mrs. Gandhi, to a more decentralised and democratic mode of governance. Nehruji had a similar style of democratic governance.Conducting nuclear tests was the easy part. The difficult part was getting India back into the world stream in face of sanctions, a form of technological and economic apartheid unleashed on India since Pokharan I and revisited with vengeance after Pokharan II. During the period the levels of sanctions differed but stayed in place. The strategic dialogue between Jaswant Singh and Strobe Talbott since the year 2000 actually helped this regime of sanctions loosened and later removed. This dialogue laid the foundation for the Indo US Nuclear Accord which was entered during UPA I regime. I have little hestitation in saying that the real roadmap of the accord and the subsequent entry of India in select clubs controlling the technological superiority o the world was drawn during Atalji’s reign. To the uninitiated I am giving a couple of links.https://www.foreignaffairs.com/reviews/capsule-review/2004-11-01/engaging-india-diplomacy-democracy-and-bombhttp://www.rediff.com/news/2004/sep/21inter.htm3. Atalji recognised that the path to express economic growth goes through infrastructure growth and economic reforms. To this end the two flagship projects of Golden Quadrilateral and PM Gramin Sadak Yojana (Village road project) were envisioned and brought on ground very successfully. The opening up of insurance sector which has been a glorious success and initiating the debate on one country one tax (GST was not named then) were the main highlights. Another infrastructure booster would have been linking up of rivers but nothing much could be achieved in that project in 4.5 years. He controlled the fiscal deficit very well and handed over the economy in very robust state to UPA I.4. He handled the pressure from the world’s sole superpower during height of Kargil War superbly and won the war for the country militarily and more important diplomatically.5. He handled the pulls and pressures of a minority government very competently. It will not be wrong to say that he set up a benchmark for running a government consisting of multiple parties. In this aspect the only competition he gets is from PV Narasimha Rao, another great PM. I rate Atalji just a bit better because the core of Rao's government was Congress, the dominant party of India for 4 decades while the core of Atal Government was, for the first time, a non-Congress government. And this government completed its term. This speak volumes about his leadership abilities.So in my opinion, the above five contribution from Atalji give him his rightful place among the best PMs of India.

The rules here are very complicated. In most cases it is the parent the child actually lives with the most (the rule is where the child sleeps). What matters is where the child actually sleeps, not which parent has legal custody. If the child did not live with either parent for at least half of the year, it gets more complicated. If neither parent provides at least half of the child’s financial support, it also gets complicated. If the child provides more than half of his or her own support from his or her own income, neither parent can claim the child.In most cases, the parents can enter into a voluntary agreement to allow the parent with which the child does not spend the most time to claim the child (this is often done when the noncustodial parent has greater income, because that results in a larger tax reduction). The noncustodial parent may offer the custodial parent anything of value as consideration to enter into such an agreement (and if such an offer is made and accepted, the custodial parent is legally obliged to execute Form 8332 for each year for which the agreement is in effect). In general, any language in the divorce decree which sets forth which parent may claim the deduction or credit will be binding, although there are exceptions to this too.Two absolute rules are that a person may be claimed as a dependent on one and only one tax return in any given year, and that a child may be the basis for the child tax credit on at most one tax return in any given year. Any attempt to violate these two rules will result in a very large blizzard of attention from the IRS.(ObSillyFact: I once got a letter of adjustment from the IRS because the IRS disallowed my attempt to claim myself as a dependent on my own tax return. This was due to a mismatch that arose because I had a name change in process at the SSA at the same time my tax return was processed, resulting in a “no match” when the IRS attempted to verify my SSN. The IRS agent apologized for the mixup when I called the processing center to inquire.)