Application For Invalidity Benefits: Fill & Download for Free

Initially, a provisional patent application will be reviewed for formalities such as whether it contains a specification that is legible and the filing fee was paid, but not much more than that.However, if a non-provisional patent application is subsequently filed that claims the benefit of the provisional, the examiner may look over the provisional to determine whether there is proper support in the provisional for the claimed subject matter recited in the non-provisional. If there is inadequate support, then the examiner would not allow the applicant to use the provisional application for the earlier effective filing date.

This is Arindam Chaudhuri.A Self proclaimed Business Whiz with a Ponytail. He claimed to make Business Geniuses of all Mediocre Students claiming that India was going the ‘Wrong way’ in teaching Business Practices.His ‘Victims’ dont have a JOB after 3 years of believing the drivel. His course has been declared invalid and so at the end of the day - His Victims are still paying the Loans taken and have zero benefit.Investopedia is a better bet and it is free.The Simple Question is this - Why is SRK not liable?SRKs simple contention would be that he is an Actor and a Professional and he does not need to investigate a person to endorse his product. He would also say Arindam is a Great Guy as an Individual.The Reason is Our Laws. We still have Colonial British Laws and those laws did not exactly envision that one day there would be Crore Rupee endorsements and every single Celebrity would take advantage and mislead and misguide the public.In other Countries there are Regulations.Lets see SRKs fate in the following Countries:-USA - Nothing. Zilch.UK and Europe - Nothing. Zilch. Not even Civil Liability.Japan - Nothing. Zilch.China - CAPA - Misleading the Public and Public Deception - Punishment 3–7 Years and a fine of upto 50 Million Yuan or an additional 3–7 year imprisonment (Maximum upto 14 years). [Usually this is applicable for Political Statements only but in 2013 they did jail 2 Radio Hosts for endorsing a potentially cancer causing product despite knowing the risks)Furthermore - Actors can be punished by (a) Ensuring that no performance of theirs be screened or no movie or advertisement or serial of theirs be aired - where the actor makes an appearance for 30 seconds or more unless it is approved by the Ministry.Countries like US, UK and Europe - assume the People to be wise enough to fall victim to people like Arindam Chaudhuri. For instance before joining any university - the first thing is to look at the UGC document and certificate.Yet in India- people are FOOLS. They fall victim to SRKs endorsements. They fall victim to Sonam Kapoor or Deepika Padukones endorsements.SRK and others know this very well. They know the law wont punish them. They know most Judges are their fans. They know we have short memories. They know that all we can do is talk nonsense on Twitter or Quora and then rush to watch his next film.If India were different, say like China - he would be Much more cautiousTomorrow if the Govt say found out that SRK endorsed Arindam and Students were cheated - he would be hauled up to a CAPA Court and outright told to pay 50 Million Yuan and for the next 3 years - no appearances on any media over 30 secs (No Movie releases, No Ads, not even interviews) and in the worst case - Prison for upto 14 years.He would think 500 times about signing any contract. He would demand to attend their marketing strategies. He would demand to see safety certificates for products.Right now - we have to follow the simple rules(a) Does SRK send his children to IIPM? Does SRK send his Kids to BYJU. No they go to some Fancy School in London or Switzerland.(b) Is SRK doing this out of the benefit of his heart? No he is taking a Fat Fee. He is nothing more than a Paid Lackey.(c) Is it worth Paying Byjus in the Short and long run?After this - we simply turn the channel when SRK bleats his endorsement of Byjus.We have no other Way - This is a Democracy and here our people have no ethics or standards. They are FOR SALE.

Let’s make one thing clear: Trump can’t do nothing on his own. All he can do is to enact some rules, which can easily be overturned by the next president. What he does is not something that everyone is concerned about.After that, there is no penalization of green card applicants for needing public benefits, because just being an applicant doesn’t entitle them to any benefit. Once they are green card holders, we can talk about this but it is a moot point then too. “Why ?” you may ask.Well, if you obtained your green card by family based immigration, the person sponsoring you or their financial supporter is in charge of your well being, as they signed an affidavit of financial support so that you can get your green card. Hence you should not need government handout for a while.If you obtained your green card via employment based petition, you should be working and not needing government assistance. When and if you get laid off, there is unemployment insurance to pitch in before you go to other sources from government and unemployment payments come from the company which laid you off, not the government. So, it doesn’t count as government handout.Lastly, if obtained your green card via DV-1, you declared that you have sufficient funds to last you a year’s worth of unemployment. If you don’t, well, you lied on your declaration and it basically invalidates your green card.Having said all of this, if you were in this country for more than a year, you worked you fall into hard times, then there is no punishing you or anyone else for that matter.So your question is an oxymoron on its own.