See Reverse For Application Instructions: Fill & Download for Free

I think that admissions interviews, for applicants who get that far, are getting more challenging. Some medical schools are switching from traditional interviews to a much more varied and challenging method called multiple mini-interviews (MMIs).In an MMI, a candidate rotates through 8 to 12 stations, each with an interviewer in the room and a prompt outside the room. The candidate gets 2 minutes to study the prompt, then goes into the room and discusses or responds to it. for abut 6 to 8 minutes. It may be a prompt to discuss an issue of medical ethics, for example. In some cases, two candidates go in at once. Without being able to see what each other is doing, one candidate has to give the other one oral instructions of how to make a certain drawing, and then they reverse roles. It’s an exercise in communication, both giving clear information and receiving, interpreting, and acting on it. Or two candidates may be taken in at once and asked to debate opposite sides of a controversial medical issue while the interviewer just watches. Another I’ve heard of is for the candidate to be told to build something from parts provided, and explain the logic of why they’re doing what they do.This is a lot different from the traditional “Tell me about yourself; why do you want to be a doctor?” sort of interview. It seems to me much more challenging and a deeper probe into the personality and thought processes of a candidate.Twenty-eight of the 143 U.S. medical schools are now using an interview method called multiple mini-interviews (MMIs), and another 18 schools are using an MMI–traditional hybrid.

The actual differences between the three are too many for an answer here. Most of these subtle differences lie in the way memory is addressed, exceptions are handled, branches are executed etc. There are many subtle differences too that are beyond the scope of a brief answer here. From a high level though, I can think of these:RISC vs CISC: This is the classic difference between ARM/MIPS and x86. RISC stands for Reduced Instruction Set Computer and CISC is Complete ISC. x86 is a CISC processor and both ARM/MIPS are RISC. The philosophy behind CISC processors is that a single instruction can do multiple things; like add an immediate number with a register, store this value to an address computed using some other register and also set arithmetic flags. RISC processors on the other hand would have two separate instructions for this; one to add two numbers and the other to store the result. This increases the instruction count but makes the instructions simpler. Which brings me to the second point.Power vs Performance: Simpler instructions tend to consume lesser power. x86 processors are typically designed for high performance applications like servers, while RISC processors are used in mobile applications where performance is sometimes compromised for better power efficiency. It should be noted however that these lines are thinning down everyday. ARM has added more complexity to its instructions to get better performance and Intel breaks down its opcodes into micro-ops that are ARM like to achieve better power. MIPS perhaps remains the simplest ISA around and is used more heavily in embedded applications where ultra low power consumption is needed.Security and virtualization: Not sure about MIPS here, but ARM has something called TrustZone and Intel has vPro. Both these features target hardware security. Both ARM and Intel have support for virtualization and memory management, and they differ only in their implementation. These are rather new features that are needed in newer applications and thus, both ISAs have one or the other flavor. So you see, the differences are trimming down.All in all, the ISAs matter only from the programming point at this time. The mobile software ecosystem is way better developed and maintained for ARM than it is for x86. The picture reverses when it comes to desktop applications. That is the main reason why Intel is struggling to get into the mobile market and ARM is having a hard time to get into servers. In all of this, MIPS is there somewhere along with Sparc, PowerPC etc being used in rather niche applications.

I will try to make it simple for you.See every copyrighted product it can be a game or a software etc.when you buy it off the shelf officially by paying the amount contains a product key or a license which is only to be used for that certain piece of content. The people who pirate these games or softwares need a way through which you can use these applications without paying for them, so what they generally do is that they decrypt the copyright protection installed on the software and then reverse engineer it which leads to a crack or many times a key generator (mostly crack).The crack file is a part or a certain portion of the files which the application needs to run and the people who made the software put the copyright protection in this file( Of course they want to make money.!! ), but there are people who can bypass it easily/hardly, they reverse engineer it so it can be used by us ( without paying even a penny ).In layman terms a crack file is a patch file or a part of the program which has been reverse engineered so it can be used without using the original license keys or authorization.How to use it ?This depends from app to app/game to game because of the vastness of the available copyright protections there is no one way which will work for all the applications ... the application you have downloaded must contain instructions on how to use the crack file.Thanks for A2A.