Instructions For Employment Applications: Fill & Download for Free

Fundamentally because the USA is and always has been an extremely racist place and is more interested in dividing people by separating them into groups than it is in uniting people based on their common humanity. As Alejandra stated, it seems to be a compulsion in the USA.According to USA usage, the designation “Hispanic”, or alternately “Latino” refers to an ethnicity that is based on the countries of origin and that the common language of those areas is Spanish. Instructions for completing race and ethnicity designators in forms such as applications for employment, applications for federally-subsidized free and reduced price school lunch programs, US federal census data, and the variety of other forms in the USA that intrusively request information on an individual’s racial and ethnic profiles specifically state that a person who is considered for US federal purposes “Hispanic” by ethnicity may identify as any race—white, black, Native American, Asian—but who has ancestors who spoke Spanish.It is to me a rather odd and arbitrary way to classify people. The USA doesn’t class the ethnicity of people who are descendants of people who spoke, for example, French, regardless of what racial profile that person may have. They definitely do not track by ethnicity people descended from English or German speakers. The only ethnicity designation tracked is Hispanic. Go figure.

Excerpts from instructions for filling up passport application form.‘Indian citizens categorized as ECR, are required to get a clearance from the office of Protector of Emigrants, Ministry of Overseas Indian Affairs before leaving the country for employment purpose. For further clarification refer website http://www.moia.gov.in’Please visit the website mentioned above for detailed instructions.

In the details of your question, you add:That is: If I want to accomplish task A, and instruction X does just that, can I be sure that it will do it in the optimal way?In general, no. At least, not always.There are some instructions which exist for historical reasons, but you’re better off not using them on modern processors.For example, x86 processors have a LOOP instruction. But, if you grab Agner Fog’s instruction tables, you’ll find many processors impose a fairly large penalty for that instruction. For example, Ivy Bridge expands it to 7 µops.Does that mean it’s slower? Not necessarily. But it does suggest you need to measure if you care about performance.I remember a DSP at my previous employer that had an LMS instruction that was intended to accelerate the least-mean-squares algorithm. The next generation of DSP in that same family could compute the LMS algorithm faster if it used other instructions—the LMS instruction itself could not be sped up.If you care about the last iota of performance, measure. But, be sure it actually matters.Chances are, if you can’t measure a difference, it didn’t matter. If you can, though, then it might matter if the code sequence is important enough.At that point, measure in the context of the full application. If you can’t see a difference at the application level, then it didn’t actually matter, even if you saw a difference at the microbenchmark level.Ultimately: write clear and maintainable code whenever possible.And avoid assembly language unless it’s absolutely necessary.