Rule 316 Operation & Maintenance Plan - Maricopa County: Fill & Download for Free

Fresh water flush places an obvious load on a ships fresh water capacity that makes sea water flush seem to be superior, and in circumstances where the area of operation permits stage one treated (macerated) discharge into the ocean it may be so.However, where the black and grey water cannot be discharged, the Great Barrier Reef being one obvious area, but has to be held in a tank and pumped into the home ports sewage system, salt water may not be permitted as many modern municipal sewage systems rely on bacteria which may be destroyed by salt water.The ship I was involved with before this one used fresh water flush and vacuum heads which economise on water a lot, and the pleasure boat industry is starting to produce 12 and 24 volt complete treatment systems.Also, the piping that carries sewage can be corrosion proof PVC only outside fire hazard areas such as engine rooms, where it must be carried in steel, or stainless steel piping. Apart from weight and cost issues, type 316 or even type 2205 stainless does not do well coping with the corrosion issues of raw sewage and salt water.Sewage systems are the bane of my life, and have been since my early days as a shipwright in the navy. I spent a large part of my formative years clearing the most unlikely and revolting things out of sewage lines, and I am pretty hardened to it now.The rule is “Never put anything into a marine toilet unless you have eaten it first.”

Actually, I’m going to disagree with all of the answers here. Great Britain did invade Poland, but it invaded occupied Poland, so it invaded the expanding Nazi empire in support of Polish resistance to the Nazi invasion.In July 1940, Winston Churchill founded the Special Operations Executive (SOE). to operate in disguise behind enemy lines, developing resistance in countries occupied by the Nazi war machine. Individuals were trained. When France and Poland fell, people from those countries joined the SOE in hopes of helping to free their countries from the Nazi occupation. In January 1941, SOE dropped Polish and perhaps British operatives behind enemy lines in Poland. This is, in an odd sense, an invasion of Poland in defense of Poland.See Minute 36 of Episode 1 of Churchill’s Secret Army (https://www.netflix.com/watch/80195911?trackId=14170289&tctx=0%2C0%2Cf8ae9bff-fa10-4ba3-ab41-34d329486e67-22222591%2C7fc002c3-efe4-4e6f-a930-1fa3e7ff5bf1_86069463X3XX1532574513024%2C7fc002c3-efe4-4e6f-a930-1fa3e7ff5bf1_ROOT) for a description of how British special forces dropped a team of agents behind enemy lines into occupied Poland.Success in entering Poland opened the door to sending SOI agents into all of Europe. These agents did a great deal to slow down German forces, and over 10,000 French Resistance fighters were ready to assist the invading Allied forces on D-Day.In a comment, Marcin Terlecki added some interesting information. All in all, 316 Polish operatives were trained by the SOE and dropped into Poland by parachute. As all the operatives in Poland were Polish, one could say that this was not a British invasion. This, I think, is a matter of interpretation. They were Polish citizens and soldiers, but the SOE put them in there because the British government wanted them in there. They were also given 630 tons of war material and lots of money. The Polish infiltrators, called the Silent Unseen, were more independent than SOE in other nations. You can learn more at Cichociemni - Wikipedia and on YouTube:This information led me to a point of speculation. As the SOE operatives finished training, the RAF (Royal Air Force) refused to drop troops out of uniform behind enemy lines, as this was not within accepted rules of war. Yet they were willing to make the first drop into Poland. Probably the fact that they were sending Polish men (and perhaps women) back to Poland, rather than sending British citizens in disguise was what gave legitimacy to the method in the eyes of the RAF. Once the Polish effort showed success, the rest of the British military was more willing to cooperate with the SOE.

There is a doctrine called intergovernmental immunity that states that the federal government may not tax the states without their consent, and that states may not tax the federal government without its consent.The principle that a state may not tax the federal government (or any of its instrumentalities) was set down by the Supreme Court in 1819, in its decision in McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 U.S. 316 (1819), in a dispute over the First Bank of the United States, which Maryland attempted to prohibit by imposing a ruinous tax upon it.The principle that the federal government may not tax states is more complicated. The original rule, set down in 1871 in the case The Collector v. Day, 78 U.S. 113 (1870), was that states were entirely immune to federal taxation and that the federal government could lay no tax on the activities of a state. However, there are now a large number of holes in this doctrine, not the least of which is the Sixteenth Amendment, and states are subject to some forms of taxation when they engage in what are called “market participant activities”. For example, if a state operates an entity that sells some product to its residents and that product is subject to a federal excise tax, the state must pay that tax (or, in the case of an excise tax collected by the seller from the buyer, collect it from its customers and remit it to the federal government) because it is acting as a “market participant”. However, any revenue collected by the state (or any of its instrumentalities) acting in its distinctive role as a sovereign rather than as a market participant is entirely immune from federal taxation.