Form 111 Cms: Fill & Download for Free

If biggest means tallest, than its Great Danes (average size 70–80 cms) and Irish Wolfhounds (minimum height of 80 cms). The world record was set up by Great Dane Zeus, who had height of 111 cms.But if biggest means heaviest, than its English Mastiffs with weight around 100 kgs.There are other very large dogs, for example Neapolitan Mastiffs, Saint Bernards, Newfoundlands, Leonbergers, Cane Corsos, Dogue de Bordeaux or Scottish Deerhounds.You can watch my video about all these dogs here:

Is this a game of “spot the odd one out”?Because at first glance, I see in the list 3 CMs/ex CMs of some of the biggest states in India.However, the trick lies in looking closer.Mayawati, the voice of the oppressed Dalit community, the face of the downtrodden, the one who is affectionately called “Behenji” (“Respected Sister”) is a con artist at best.In the Rajya Sabha nomination papers, Mayawati herself has given details of her property. In 2007 her total wealth was Rs 52 crore which increased to 111 crores in 2012.A bungalow spread over five acres of land in the posh area of Lucknow has been constructed at a cost of around 100 crore rupees which was all the public money. Rs. 86.56 crore was spent on its construction and renovation whereas another Rs. 20.15 lakh was spent on its maintenance. The money spent on the bungalow was also not audited either. In 2004, she used to have a government bungalow and a house worth Rs 1.75 crore only.During her tenure as Chief Minister her brother Anand Kumar also made huge gains. His fortunes grew exponentially between 2007 and 2014. His net worth rose from nearly Rs 7.5 crore to Rs 1,316 crore.(Million Dollar Mayawati: The total worth of the "Dalit Leader" She! What a cleaver leader!)Despite the fact that she ruled over India’s largest state, one that is grappling with poverty, joblessness, law and order, she decided to splurge thousands of crores on parks celebrating former Dalit leaders.But her fresh demand for grants has perturbed the Opposition parties, who say that she has already spent over Rs 2,500 crore on her pet projects - five parks and memorials in the name of Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar, Ramabai Ambedkar and BSP's founder Kanshi Ram - in Lucknow between 2007 and 2009. A few months ago, another Rs 500 crore was approved for maintenance and new construction in and around these buildings.(Mayawati government spends on parks, ignores healthcare, education and infrastructure)UP consistently ranks as one of the worst-performing states in terms of most socio-economic parameters. A 2018 report by CRISIL showed that UP was the worst performing major Indian state from 2013–17 (just post Mayawati’s 5-year stint as CM)Mamata Banerjee, on the other hand, does not have a declared net worth in 100s of crores. But we can all see the drama around the Sharada Chit Fund Scam and the stopping of CBI enquiry into the same unfolding right now.Most are aware of the pathetic condition of WB under her rule wherein communal harmony has taken a long leave of absence. In just 2017, there were dozens of riots, and Didi (elder sister) just sat there silently. From Dhulagarh to Kaliachak. From Asansol to Bhaduria.What once used to be the intellectual capital of India has been reduced to a poor, warring state ruled by the iron fist of MaoMata. The state rarely discloses data around growth.There has been a huge state-sponsored influx of Bangladeshi immigrants for vote-bank politics.We had an estimate that there were 3 crore illegal Bangladeshi immigrants in Bengal of which 1.2 crore moved to other parts of the country. The situation in Bengal is more calamitous, when compared to the rest of the states, Bhushan says.(Calamitous situation in Bengal: 3 crore illegal Bangladeshis reside there)The state routinely backs out of government schemes like Ayushman Bharat and Smart Cities. RERA, a breakthrough initiative to curb the land mafia and black market of real estate was disallowed in WB too (guess why!). She cares zilch for the state or its people. Her only goal is to say no to anything the central government says in order to stoke her ego (Mamata vs Modi govt: 5 central schemes stonewalled by the West Bengal CM)Going by the RBI Data, from 2011–12 to 2017–18, the real NSDP per capita of Bengal grew at a sluggish 4.2%, beaten only by Uttar Pradesh at 3.7%.There is literally no comparison between the two who have managed to run two of India’s largest states into the ground versus Modi who lifted Gujarat into one of India’s best performing states in his 3 terms as CM and has done the same for the entire nation in the last 5 years.

The word “think” is misleading. It indicates that they thought about it, and came to a firm conclusion that the private companies would agree. Instead, they decided that they could not let go of all of Air India - need some control for various reasons. All of these reasons are political and privilege.As I see it, the Union government was trying to sell Air India under very tough terms:1. Take on a lot of AI's debt.2. GOI to be co-pilot- own 24%. This is the point in the question.3. Employees to be protected.In my opinion, point 3 is the most constraining. It is the deal breaker. No new owner wants holdover senior staff - or even unmotivated junior staff. The buyer knows that costs cannot be cut with these employees, who are used to a different style of working. And, costs have to be cut. It is possible to increase revenues, but without cutting costs, the buyer will not generate enough net revenues. This is a particularly tough task, given the high levels of debt service.Condition number 2 is tolerable by itself. Meaning that if condition 3 was not there, it’s possible that there could be a sale. And, if both conditions 1 and 3 were missing, then condition 2 would not be enough to stop buyers.A company is as good as its employees. If they are not the employees you chose, then you don’t want to run that company.But, this is a major political headache of the Union government. The preparation for the Lok Sabha elections has already begun. If the new owner of Air India fired many of the current employees - even with some small severance package - that would create a problem. The economy is not creating enough jobs. Air India is maintaining some jobs at great cost to the Union government. But, at least, the jobs are there.So, in the end, no sale will go through of the buyer cannot change/reduce the employees.UpdateSee this quote from Why no one wants Air IndiaAI has the largest number of employees per aircraft among Indian airlines. As per the preliminary information memorandum, AI had 26,978 employees (including permanent, contractual, casual, and on-deputation staff) for a fleet of 115 aircraft — or 234 employees per aircraft. In comparison, as of March 31, 2017, IndiGo had 111 employees per aircraft (for its fleet of 131), Jet Airways had 142 (for a fleet of 112 aircraft), and low-cost carrier SpiceJet, 140 (for 49 planes). The employees-per-aircraft ratio is a key metric used in the industry to identify the operational efficiency of an airline. Eventual reduction of contractual employees was one of the measures to be undertaken by Air India as part of its turnaround plan.Air India has far too many employees, and too many of them are deadwood. With GOI owning 24%, the new owner would never be able to do anything significant abut this.Sikkim and its Chief MinisterI have written several times that India’s progress depends as much upon its CMs as on the PM. Today’s Washington Post highlights the good work done by Sikkim’s CM - on his own. Mr. Chamling has been CM since 1994, and is currently the CM with the longest tenure.https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/pesticides-helped-bring-modern-farming-to-india-one-tiny-state-is-leading-the-charge-to-ban-them/2018/05/29/95c7e594-3da6-11e8-955b-7d2e19b79966_story.html?utm_term=.670d00b1003dFifteen years ago, the tiny Indian state of Sikkim launched a radical experiment: Its leaders decided to phase out pesticides on every farm in the state, a move without precedent in India — and probably the world.The change was especially significant for India, a country whose progress in agriculture was defined by the introduction of fertilizers and pesticides that rapidly boosted food production across the country, staving off famine and reducing the country’s reliance on foreign aid.But with the indiscriminate use of pesticides came a spike in cancer rates in industrial farming areas. Rivers became polluted and soil infertile. Sikkim’s leaders say they were driven to go all- organic by those concerns and because pesticide residue — including from some chemicals banned in other countries — was tainting fish, vegetables and rice.The cloud-wreathed Himalayan state is starting to see the dividends. Overall health has increased in the state, leaders say, and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government has embraced Sikkim and organic farming throughout India, pouring about $119 million into supporting organic farmers nationwide. India is betting that Sikkim can be the global model for other jurisdictions around the world that want to go all-organic.I am not suggesting that other States should also go all-organic. The bigger picture is that the CM decided to do something on his won for his State. That’s what all CMs need to do.