Student Employee Evaluation & Termination Form: Fill & Download for Free

This summer I'm working on the following (all of which are not annual events, or haven't been in the past)Create training for students via video or screen shotsRelocate all Game Room equipment (we're losing the Gaming space for an office)Integrate Strengths-based leadership into our evaluation and student employee model

There is an old saying:Those who can, do.Those who can’t, teach.Those who can’t teach, administrate.I question the first statement, and disagree with the second.But, in my opinion, the third is not only true, but is the main reason there are problems in the education system.The biggest problem I saw when my wife was a teacher was the school system’s inability to mimic the most basic of standard business practices. I’m not talking about how teachers manage classrooms, or how educators deal with students. I’m referring to how administration deals with teachers. If administration would deal with teachers the way Paychex, or Xerox, or Wegmans, or Corning deals with employees and lower level supervisors, the school districts would be in much better shape.For example, (here, Gary Wagner plagiarizes Gary Wagner) on one of my wife’s last evaluations, she waited almost a month to hear feedback. Although feedback was typically negative, she still looked forward to hearing what administration had to say. Normally the more inane the criticisms were, the better she was doing at her job. This time, however, she needed to track down the vice-principal to find out the results of the evaluation. The vice-principal said there was nothing to report.Nothing to report?!? In the corporate world, there are annual employee evaluations, and often monthly one-on-one meetings, formal or otherwise, to see how things are going. The slightest accomplishment is lauded in hopes of encouraging improved behaviors (“In the past 20 days, you’ve punched in on time 15 times. That is a noticeable improvement over last month, and we’re looking forward to seeing hopefully more improvement in the near future.”) “Nothing to report” means everything was so perfect, there was nothing to criticize. In the corporate world, there would be a blue ribbon, or a special pin, or a $5 Starbucks’ card, or a cake, or a bonus, or a merit increase in pay. In the teaching world, administrators don’t seem to understand the basics of employee management.Too many people going into teaching have no clue.

I am going to write the truth about this unfair evaluation..there are few things u must know...1. GGSIPU pays Rs. 25 per answer book ....in one bundle there are 30 answer books so it makes Rs750/- for evaluating one bundle....GGSIPU norms say that a evaluator must take 3 hours to evaluate one bundle....so in a day a evaluator can evaluate a maximum of two bundles.....which makes a total earning of Rs.1500/- per day + a conveance of Rs.600/- per day making the total amount = Rs. 2100/-.Now what actually happens is in the university there are two evaluation centres one for first and third year and the other for second and final year.....now actually what happens is....an evaluator reaches centre A at 9:30 am and get a bundle issued which he/she checks in one hour but do not deposit it as the university employees will not take it back before three hours...so they leave that bundle there and rush too the B centre and get another bundle issued there at 11:00 they check it by 12:00 now they rush back to centre A to return their previous bundle and get a new bundle issued there....the same process is repeated and an evaluator ends up in checking two bundles each at both evaluation centres thus earning Rs. 4200/- a day instead of Rs. 2100/- a day..now just imagine the answer book u wrote in 3 hours is evaluated in less then 2 minutes.....coz the evaluator has to right the marks on front sheet and do the total and also fill an additional evaluation sheet with marks....and all this he does in a maximum of 1 and a half hour for 30 answer books. This is done by around 20 % evaluators who comes for evaluation.2. To be an evaluator the university ask every evaluator to fill a form which contains a maximum of four subject that the evaluator has taught in the current semester.....this form need to be signed by the hod and the head of the institution also......now the beauty is very few teachers teaches more then two subject in college but in these forms most of the evaluators fill four subjects....now imagine four subject for centre A and four subject for centre B which mean they know 8 subjects and thus makes them elligible to check copies of 8 different subjects...coz if one subject answer books are over then they can get the next subject issued....3. Approx. 80 % of the evaluators do not prepare a solution nor do they know the solution.....they are just giving average marks.....that is the reason why the students writing anything get marks and often pass the exams.4. Most of the senior and sincere teachers do not go for evaluation....the people doing evaluation are primarily those who are on consolidated salary getting anything between Rs.20,000/ to Rs. 30,000/- as salary from there parent college....so they find it as an opportunity to earn some extra money.....just imagine that there are evaluators who earn around Rs. 50,000/ or even more during evaluation......this should explain most of the reasons....5. The fact is very few evaluators actually evaluate the answer books....90% of evaluation is done with just the monitary benefits associated with it....so until the university takes some serious counter measures .....this will continue to happen.....I am sorry for those who feel offended by my answer....but am ready to face any debate who could challenge my answer.....Mukesh Sahu.Assistant Professor (ECE Deptt)H.O.D. (Industry Institute Partnership Cell).Branch Counsellor IEEE-GTBIT.Guru Tegh Bahadur Institute of Technology.G-8 Area, Rajouri Garden ,New Delhi.