Check Gma: Fill & Download for Free

i almost passed on this question, but it rang a bell when i read it a few times.maybe they do. i do know that my gma was definitely abusive and narcissistic. thinking about your question if she was malignant, and i can definitely check off some boxes on that one.ok, so here you go. she would always fart when standing right beside you. and wouldn't move. was she too old to move? hell no! she got around good so it wasn't bc she was old and “couldn't help it”.she would ride in the car, and fart and not say anything. no window rolled down or nothing. no warning. just god awful shit! no apologies. shes been like that since i can remember. im 43. shes 82.

I have had this appear on a few things I have posted on facebook.There is also the removal of posts, even in private groups, which has happened to be several times. The most curious of which was when locking horns with the editor of Bellingcat, on twitter…who obviously has some influence, and the very next day, my posts about bellingcat and MH17 in a private group on facebook were deleted with a warning that they were fake news.This is not some crazed tin hat conspiracy theory, but censorship at work of anything that criticizes/challenges the mainstream media narrative. It also very clearly demonstrates the links between twitter and facebook - which extend to youtube and google of course also.The most popular social media platforms are the true hotbeds of propaganda. And anyone who believes otherwise is incredibly naive and very well controlled indeed. The worst case of this is for those who consider themselves intelligent, well read, objective who are unable to accept that the very platform they are using is incredibly censored and biased to the very stance they have been fed from a million angles…It is a common goal of any group of overseers to create the impression of free will, and to completely own the discourse. if you can make those who need to feel like activists feel like they have formed their own opinion and can express it, and control that from all sides, then you have complete control and there is zero real dissent…at least, zero real dissent permitted on the social media platforms were everyone is now plugged in morning day and night.The mainstream ‘media’ channels reinforce this and are very much connected both state and corporate (barely any different, as the latter generally owns the former) wise to the same censorship and One Narrative allowed routine. This also involves the academic world with Harvard one of a few who have got involved with the ‘fact checking’ and ‘fake news’ industry.Yet back to facebook…and their faithful PolitiFact partners.Who are Politifact?They are owned by Poynter Institute.Well they seem partnered up with Stanford and part of a process paid for and orchestrated by the mainstream media owned by the financial elite to censor and remove anything not meeting their narrative>Search engine and advertising monolith Google continued to press its offensive against alternative media this week with an announcement unveiling a new $300 million project called the Google News Initiative.The initiative encompasses a range of new projects announced by the tech giant, which has long been accused of enjoying a monopoly position and of siphoning off digital advertising revenue from traditional news publishers.Google sees it differently, however, and asserted in a press statement announcing the initiative that it “paid $12.6 billion to partners” while driving “10 billion clicks a month to publishers’ websites for free.” The company is now promising to continue working “with publishers to elevate accurate, quality content and stem the flow of misinformation and disinformation.”The move will likely drive the stake further into the heart of independent media while merging Silicon Valley with mainstream publishers traded on Wall Street and aligned with the agendas of beltway politicians in Washington.Marginalizing dissident voices en masseAccording to Google:The commitments we’re making through the Google News Initiative demonstrate that news and quality journalism is [sic] a top priority for Google. We know that success can only be achieved by working together, and we look forward to collaborating with the news industry to build a stronger future for journalism.”Launched in a partnership with a range of traditional corporate media giants – including The Washington Post, The New York Times, Financial Times, and U.S. newspaper giant Gannett – the project promises to combat so-called “fake news” and misinformation. Many reasonably fear, based on recent trends, that this will mean the further marginalization of non-hegemonic left-wing and conservative media — as well as a sort of “death by algorithm” for already-struggling publishers who once flourished, prior to the hysteria over alleged “Russian interference” and propaganda in the 2016 elections.The initiative will include a new lab to analyze and parse out what is deemed “mis- and disinformation during elections and breaking news moments;” a fact-checking partnership with Stanford University and corporate media non-profit groups like the Local Media Association and the Poynter Institute; and a new service meant to expedite reader subscriptions to pay-gated news websites, among other new projects.Google Partners With Corporate Media to Defeat Independent JournalismWho funds Poynter Institute?They are openly funded by George Soros Open Society Foundation - which also funds a multitude of other NGO companies with fancy names who basically churn out-validation and promotion of US led global hegemonysteady attacks on the enemies of the US led empiremasquerading as a force for democracy and transparency, reinforces the mass propaganda of their partners in the elite owned corporate media e.g. BBC, NYT, Wash Post, FT, Bus Insider…Soros himself as long been involved with various regime change routines and is one of the richest men on Earth.To get an idea of how everything he supports adopts his agenda on Russia and Putin>Putin is a bigger threat to Europe’s existence than Isis - SorosPutin is a bigger threat to Europe’s existence than Isis | George SorosGeorge Soros: Russia threatens EU’s survivalGeorge Soros: Russia threatens EU’s survivalOther form of the Soros fiend>Directly contribution to the hideous balkanisation of Yugoslavia-The Open Society Institute of George Soros was also funneling money into Popović ’s Otpor! for the toppling of Milosevic. I have yet to find a CIA and US State Department regime change or Color Revolution in which the “democracy-building” foundations of Soros were not in a kind of harmony with the Washington State Department and CIA agenda.CIA Backed Color Revolutions - Global ResearchGeorge Soros’ supposed philanthropy is actually a functional instrument of investing. Nowhere is this more clearly seen than in the hedge fund billionaire’s Middle East effort. As one researcher mildly put it, “Soros-funded groups increase tensions in this troubled region” of our world. Here’s a look into how a now notorious instigator of conflict and regime change affects the crises surrounding the nation of Israel.I am not the first analyst to research and report on the nefarious machinations of George Soros. We’ve all heard of the hedge fund financial legend’s checkered past, his aiding the Nazis in Hungary as a teenager, his busting the Bank of England, and making billions off the losses of the multitude in financial crisis. Soros efforts in trouble spots worldwide are now the stuff of urban legend. His complicity or direct intervention in regime change, the societal upheaval of whole regions, it all seems beyond the scope of what most people can come to grips with. Soros’ power, the power of those behind him, it is almost unbelievable even to those in the know. I for one, am surprised by the man’s leverage on a daily basis. Today, a report from 2013 by Alexander H. Joffe, Ph.D., and NGO Monitor brings new revelations. Most notably, the sheer size of the network of Soros philanthropic efforts is extraordinary, even larger than I had imagined. Single cases of “investment” like the supposed philanthropic $100 million matching gift made in 2010 to Human Rights are miniscule when framed against the larger picture. If the reader can come to grips with the term “unimaginable influence” when thinking of Soros efforts, the rest of this report will make a lot more sense.The ROI of Crisis Building in the Middle East: More Soros Hedging | New Eastern OutlookGeorge Soros is a Hungarian-American financier who made his billions by speculating through a hedge fund; he is also a former director of the Council on Foreign Relations, and recently funded the creation of the European Council on Foreign Relations. Yet despite his establishment background, many progressive activists (particularly Democrats) hold Soros up as an important critic of the status quo, often citing as their evidence his book Open Society: Reforming Global Capitalism (2000). Clark (2003), however, provides a welcome antidote to such uncritical thinking, and describes the crucial role that Soros played in facilitating the collapse of socialism in Eastern Europe. Indeed, from 1979 onwards Soros:"...distributed $3m a year to dissidents including Poland's Solidarity movement [which was also sponsored by the CIA (15)], Charter 77 in Czechoslovakia and Andrei Sakharov in the Soviet Union. In 1984, he founded his first Open Society Institute in Hungary and pumped millions of dollars into opposition movements and independent media. Ostensibly aimed at building up a 'civil society,' these initiatives were designed to weaken the existing political structures and pave the way for eastern Europe's eventual colonisation by global capital. Soros now claims, with characteristic immodesty, that he was responsible for the 'Americanisation' of Eastern Europe." (16)The Soros Media "Empire"I won’t carry on. Either the blinkers will have come on, and there will be people stupid enough to use a Poynter connected ‘fact-checker’ to discard the sites quoted and somehow find it logical to ask Soros if Soros is a good chap or otherwise, and accept the answer as truth.Essentially, the nut of the matter is that Facebook are using one of the most obvious, mass manipulators of democracy, free speech and transparency, a man who used to direct the CFR*, one of the richest men in the world connected to many uprisings which also the CIA sponsored…as their judge of what constitutes True and False.*The CFR are a collection of corporate connections to the US intelligence services, CIA, NSA, major US military contractors, Major western Oil corporations with staggering sway over the mainstream media…>>I have barely touched the surface of Soros and his involvement in US/NATO backed bloodshed, constant demonization of Russia and financial ruin of his enemies, even when they means impoverishing millions of people in the process. That would take days!You can trust the Facebook FactChecker, Politico as much as you can trust the most powerful manipulators of the mainstream media…with a vested interest in manufacturing consent for their actions directed of the state actors they own.And yet as pointed out by Daye below, I have focused perhaps too much old George. as he is but one of several of the usual suspects in this venture. For alongside Soros, as the main funders of Poynter are to be found:Charles Koch FoundationDemocracy FundFacebookGoogle News InitiativeNational Endowment for Democracy…If you ever had any doubts of the cost of truth, or that it is for sale, just look at that listFacebook fund a company, who they then use as their ‘fact checker’.Google do the same.They pay into the pool of money which Soros and the others invest in alongside, to ensure that their ‘fact checking’ authority has the widest public exposure, the strongest endorsement from the most powerful trusted corporations on the payrol (universities like Stanford and Harvard included).And who else is there?? Funding Poynter?The Koch foundation…is of course part of the Koch family fortune, which is estimated at 50bn. Charles is somewhat similar to Soros in the funding of a huge amount of companies, many NGOs, media companies, regime change and of course oil and climate change denials.What is especially kept out of the daily news is the incendiary fact that the infamous, election-interfering Koch brothers have a dominant stake in the toxic crude of the Alberta tar-sands seeking a massive BC-pipeline out to their US refineries.Koch-owned industries have already extracted countless billions of their near $100-billion fortune from the tar-sands and deployed their well-known voter-manipulations to change the balance of power in Canada as they have done in the US.The objective is the same in both cases – ever more tax-free, publicly subsidized and state-enforced control by US Big Oil of Alberta’s massive oil resources with no government regulations or interferences in the way.For many years now, the Kochs have made most of their vast fortune from processing billions of barrels of tar-sand crude in the US, not Canada. This is why their octopi funding fronts have relentlessly pushed for ever more pipelines through others’ lands (including Dakota’s indigenous Standing Rock) to control this bigger and safer business than tar-sand extraction itself.This is also why the Kochs have led the huge financing of climate change denial against the known science, in which tar-sand extractions and burning produce far more toxic carbon gases than high-grade oil. Most of all, the Kochs have acted out of sight to ensure control over elected governments that might regulate and control their above-the-law activities. They spent more than the Republican Party itself on the 2012 US elections.Behind the Scenes and Elections: Koch-Oil Big Lies and Ecocide Writ Large in Canada | Prof. John McMurtryAlso heavily involved with GM and Monsanto…and Pompeo.According to news reports, Congressman Pompeo plans to introduce legislation to prevent states from enacting laws requiring the labeling of genetically engineered (GE) food. The bill would instead codify a failed 13-year old voluntary labeling standard for GE foods.“GMA’s selection of Congressman Pompeo as their champion shows how extreme the proposal really is,” said Colin O’Neil, director of government affairs for Center for Food Safety. “Selecting Pompeo creates an unholy alliance between Monsanto and Koch Industries, two of the most reviled corporations in America.”Congressman Mike Pompeo was the single largest recipient of campaign funds from the Koch Brothers in 2010. After winning election with Koch money, Congressman Pompeo hired a Koch Industries lawyer to run his office. According to The Washington Post, Congressman Pompeo then introduced bills friendly to Koch Industries while Koch hired outside lobbyists to support them.Koch Industries’ subsidiary, Georgia-Pacific, is a member of the Grocery Manufacturers Association which donated more than $7 million against the recent Washington State ballot initiative to label GE foods. Monsanto, another GMA member, was the single largest contributor to that campaign. Between Washington State and California, Monsanto, GMA (including Georgia-Pacific), and others, have contributed over $67 million to keep consumers in the dark about GE foods.Center for Food Safety | Press Releases | | Koch Industries and Monsanto Team up to End Your Right to KnowToo long for many, but I may as well make one final dash to touch briefly upon the other Poynter funders:\National Endowment for DemocracyThis is a super article by a chap who is so rarely mentioned and yet whenever I come across him, he seems intelligent, brave, very well researching and passionate for exposing truth. mr William BlumAllen Weinstein, who helped draft the legislation establishing NED, declared in 1991: „A lot of what we do today was done covertly 25 years ago by the CIA.“{2)In effect, the CIA has been laundering money through NED.In a multitude of ways, NED meddles in the internal affairs of numerous foreign countries by supplying funds, technical know-how, training, educational materials, computers, faxes, copiers, automobiles, and so on, to selected political groups, civic organizations, labor unions, dissident movements, student groups, book publishers, newspapers, other media, etc. NED typically refers to the media it supports as „independent“ despite the fact that these media are on the US payroll.The NED, like the CIA before it, calls what it does supporting democracy. The governments and movements whom the NED targets call it destabilizationInternationale & Europäische Casinos für DeutschlandThey have a fancy name, like Soros’ Open Society foundation and yet are demonstrable foreign regime change specialists and completely run by US intelligence agencies. They ‘legitimize’ funding interference in foreign countries by promoting their agents as independent, democratic, freedom fighters against tyranny!Of course they are to be found funding the ‘protests’ which many HKers here on quora report as ‘foreign backed violence and brutality’…Confirmed on the NED website> Search Results for “hong kong” - NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR DEMOCRACYHere in Tibet…https://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PCAAB589.pdfPlenty more, just dig around a bit.So we have billionaires with form for regime change, election interference, media control, huge and powerful connections to the oil and agricultural industry…along with the CIA’s polished regime change team masquerading as seeking to promote democracy, alongside Google and Facebook funding…which Facebook and Google use to censor the most powerful and popular social media and search engines online.