County Of Los Angeles Claim Form 2006: Fill & Download for Free

Here is the entire criteria, selectively compiled to include all of the rules and specific details required for nominating a film for the Best Picture Oscar. It can be found on the Oscar Web site itself, under the main heading "The Awards" on the site toolbar (top left), inside the drop-down menu under "Academy Awards®," in "Rules & Eligibility," numbers 2, 3, 5, and 16 (which are the bold categories in the detailed listings below, including Eligibility, The Award Year and Deadlines, Balloting and Nominations, and Special Rules for the Best Picture of the Year Award).Or ignore all that and just click here: http://www.oscars.org/awards/academyawards/rules/index.htmlEligibilityAll eligible motion pictures, unless otherwise noted (see Paragraph 9, below), must be:feature length (defined as over 40 minutes),publicly exhibited by means of 35mm or 70mm film, or in a 24- or 48-frame progressive scan Digital Cinema format with a minimum projector resolution of 2048 by 1080 pixels, source image format conforming to ST 428-1:2006 D-Cinema Distribution Master – Image Characteristics; image compression (if used) conforming to ISO/IEC 15444-1 (JPEG 2000), and image and sound file formats suitable for exhibition in commercial Digital Cinema sites.The audio in a typical Digital Cinema Package (DCP) is 5.1 channels of discrete audio and that is the preferred audio configuration, although up to 7.1 channels is acceptable. The minimum for a non-mono configuration of the audio shall be three channels as Left, Center, Right (a Left/Right configuration is not acceptable in a theatrical environment).The audio data shall be formatted in conformance with ST 428-2:2006 D-Cinema Distribution Master – Audio Characteristics and ST 428-3:2006 D-Cinema Distribution Master – Audio Channel Mapping and Channel Labeling.for paid admission in a commercial motion picture theater in Los Angeles County,for a qualifying run of at least seven consecutive days,advertised and exploited during their Los Angeles County qualifying run in print media, andwithin the Awards year deadlines specified in Rule Three.Films that, in any version, receive their first public exhibition or distribution in any manner other than as a theatrical motion picture release will not be eligible for Academy Awards in any category. This includes broadcast and cable television as well as home video and Internet transmission. Motion pictures released in such non-theatrical media on or after the first day of their Los Angeles County qualifying run remain eligible. Also, ten minutes or ten percent of the running time of a film, whichever is shorter, may be shown in a nontheatrical medium prior to the film’s qualifying run.Eligibility is contingent on the receipt by the Academy of the following information on Official Screen Credits forms, available on the Academy’s website, to be signed by the film’s producer or distributor (unless waived by the Academy), which shall include:full, complete and authentic credits,the name of the Los Angeles County theater where the film has played, andthe dates of the Los Angeles County qualifying run.Eligibility for all awards shall first be determined by credits as they appear on the screen and/or as certified to the Academy by the producing companies, but final determination in any event shall be made by the Academy. The Academy shall not be bound by any contract or agreement relating to the sharing or giving of credit and reserves the right to make its own determination of credit for purposes of Awards consideration.In the event of any dispute concerning credits, the Academy reserves the right to declare any achievement ineligible or, alternatively, to reject all claims to credit, list credits as being in controversy and withhold any award until the dispute is resolved.The alteration of an achievement by changing a picture from the version shown in Los Angeles County, upon which eligibility is based, shall subject such achievement to the risk of being declared ineligible by the Board of Governors.Motion pictures from all countries shall be eligible for the annual awards listed in Rule One Paragraph 3, as long as they satisfy the requirements of the other applicable rules, and contain English-language subtitles if released in a foreign language.Exceptions to the eligibility requirements and methods of qualifying listed in Rules Two and Three appear in the Special Rules for the Animated Feature Film award (see Rule Seven), the Documentary awards (see Rule Eleven), the Foreign Language Film award (see Rule Thirteen), the Music awards (see Rule Fifteen), and the Short Film awards (see Rule Nineteen)._____________________________________________________________________The Awards Year and DeadlinesThe required Los Angeles County qualifying run (described in Rule Two Paragraph 2) must begin between January 1, 2012, and midnight of December 31, 2012.A motion picture first theatrically exhibited inside the U.S. prior to the Los Angeles County qualifying run shall be eligible for submission provided the prior exhibition takes place in a commercial motion picture theater after January 1, 2011, and that no other form of public exhibition occurs through the completion of its Los Angeles County qualifying run (previews and festivals excluded).A picture first theatrically exhibited outside the U.S. prior to the Los Angeles County qualifying run shall be eligible for submission provided the prior exhibition takes place in a commercial motion picture theater after January 1, 2011. After the start of its initial theatrical engagement, a picture may be exhibited on television and other nontheatrical media, provided those exhibitions occur outside the U.S. No film that is shown inside the U.S. in any nontheatrical medium prior to its Los Angeles County qualifying run shall be eligible for Academy Awards.Each picture may have only one Los Angeles County qualifying run. The earliest theatrical exhibition that meets such definition shall be designated the picture’s qualifying run.Official Screen Credits forms may be returned to the Academy prior to the Los Angeles County qualifying run, but not later than 60 days after such opening. However, all Official Screen Credits forms must be returned to the Academy by Friday, November 30, 2012.An achievement submitted for Academy Awards consideration may not be withdrawn after Friday, December 28, 2012.Exceptions to the above eligibility periods and submission deadlines appear in the Special Rules for the Animated Feature Film award (see Rule Seven), the Documentary awards (see Rule Eleven), the Foreign Language Film award (see Rule Thirteen), and the Short Film awards (see Rule Nineteen)_____________________________________________________________________Balloting and NominationsVoting on all achievements shall be restricted to active and life Academy members.All eligible motion pictures will be listed in the Academy’s annual "Reminder List of Eligible Releases." Before the Academy makes the Reminder List available to voters, releasing companies may be required to check their productions as they will appear in the Reminder List and assume full responsibility for errors and omissions.Individual reminder lists from which the nominations are voted shall refer only to the motion picture in which the achievement was made, and not to any individual responsible, except in the case of nominations for Acting achievements, which name both the individual and the one picture wherein the achievement occurred.Voting for nominations and awards shall be by secret ballot. Ballots shall be made available by the Academy, and completed ballots shall be received and tabulated by a firm of certified public accountants designated by the Academy President.In the nominations voting, the marking and tabulation of all ballots shall be according to the preferential, weighted average, or re-weighted range voting system. Votes for achievements in motion pictures not on the Reminder List will not be counted in the nominations balloting. Tabulation of final ballots shall be according to the plurality or preferential system. No "write-in" votes shall be counted on the final ballot.Not more than five nominations shall be made for each award, except for the Best Picture award, which shall have not more than ten nor fewer than five nominations.In the event a nominated achievement is declared ineligible by the Academy, it shall not be replaced, and the category will remain with one less nomination.In the event that an achievement voted an award was done in collaboration, each of the eligible collaborators shall receive an award unless the number of awards is specifically limited by a category’s special rules. In the event of a tie for first place in the final balloting, awards shall be given for both achievements.The Board of Governors shall provide for such screenings or special meetings as may be desirable to insure a full and fair consideration of the merits of all eligible achievements.Each branch or other designated committee shall be permitted to formulate its own special rules, provided the final ballot presents not more than five achievements and that nominations and final voting in each category are restricted to active and life Academy members. All rules shall be presented to the Board of Governors for approval before implementation.Exceptions to the above listing in the Reminder List and nominations voting system appear in the Special Rules for the Animated Feature Film award (see Rule Seven), the Documentary awards (see Rule Eleven), the Foreign Language Film award (see Rule Thirteen), and the Short Film awards (see Rule Nineteen)._____________________________________________________________________Special Rules for the Best Picture of the Year AwardA Reminder List of all eligible motion pictures shall be made available along with a nominations ballot to all active and life members of the Academy who shall vote in the order of their preference for not more than five pictures.The pictures receiving the highest number of votes shall become the nominations for final voting for the Best Picture award. There may not be more than ten nor fewer than five nominations; however, no picture shall be nominated that receives less than five percent of the total votes cast.The individual(s) who shall be credited for Academy Award purposes must have screen credit of "producer" or "produced by." Persons with screen credits of executive producer, co-producer, associate producer, line producer, produced in association with or any other credit shall not receive nominations or Academy statuettes. The nominees will be those three or fewer producers who have performed the major portion of the producing functions. The Producers Branch Executive Committee will designate the qualifying producer nominees for each of the nominated pictures. The committee has the right, in what it determines to be a rare and extraordinary circumstance, to name any additional qualified producer as a nominee.Final voting for the Best Picture award shall be restricted to active and life Academy members.

'Is there any relationship between the opioid addiction epidemic among working/middle class Americans, and the uneven gains from the economic recovery following the 2008-09 financial crisis?'.If the 2008-2009 financial crisis and its continuing fallout triggered and/or exacerbated the ongoing US opioid addiction crisis, a striking increase in opioid overdose deaths post-2008 would be expected. However, epidemiological data does not support such a premise. This answers summarizesData showing steady year-on-year increase in opioid overdose deaths from 1999 till date, overdose death rates varying widely from state to state, disproportionately affecting whites, and increasing in tandem as opioid prescribing rates rose from 1999-2010, deaths that the CDC already noted with alarm in 2006-07.How starting in the 1990s aggressive opioid marketing and lobbying gestated the roots of the ongoing opioid epidemic by changing how the US medical system treats pain.Steady Year-on-Year Increase In Opioid Overdose Deaths From 1999 Till DateOpioids prescribed in the US peaked in 2010, decreasing steadily since then (see below from 1) though they're still much higher than in the rest of the world.'CDC analyzed retail prescription data from QuintilesIMS to assess opioid prescribing in the United States from 2006 to 2015, including rates, amounts, dosages, and durations prescribed. CDC examined county-level prescribing patterns in 2010 and 2015. ..The amount of opioids prescribed in the United States peaked at 782 morphine milligram equivalents (MME) per capita in 2010 and then decreased to 640 MME per capita in 2015.’Drug overdose deaths have steadily increased since 1999, doubling already by 2006 in 45 to 54 year olds (see second figure below from 2).Drug overdose deaths vary widely from state to state, with states with rather different economic profiles such as West Virginia, New Hampshire, Ohio, Rhode Island, Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Maine and Maryland experiencing substantial increases from 2010 to 2015 (see below from 3).Overdose deaths disproportionately affect whites (see below from 2) though overall, black males continue to have the lowest life expectancy (see below from 4).Opioid prescribing rates steadily increased 1999-2010 with overdose deaths rising in tandem (see below from 5).Already in 2006-7, CDC reported alarming increases in opioid-induced overdose deaths (see below from 6).Aggressive Opioid Marketing in the 1990s Changed How The US Medical System Treats PainA little known drugmaker best known in the 1980s for the painkiller MS Contin, Purdue Pharma morphed into a multi-billion dollar behemoth on the back of OxyContin, its 1990s upgrade, whose unprecedented marketing vaulted the Sackler family, owners of Purdue Pharma, into the ranks of the wealthiest Americans today.Well worth the reading, Mike Mariani at the Pacific Standard (7) and Patrick Radden Keefe at the New Yorker (8) methodically and comprehensively unravel the process Purdue Pharma used to relentlessly lobby all manner of doctors from general practitioners to pain physicians alike to expand opioid prescription to those with all manner of chronic pain. US doctors in the incalculably innocent pre-OxyContin era tended to view opioids as 'dangerously addictive', limiting their use to those terminally ill, usually terminal cancer patients.Mariani and Keefe recount how sheer money muscle was used to overturn this restriction in use of prescription opioids to instead render them acceptable to treat an expanding list of pain-related conditions.In practical terms, this meant serious boots on the ground in the form of intense lobbying by the likes of the now-defunct American Pain Foundation (9), and thousands of highly paid and hence extremely motivated sales reps to relentlessly push all manner of doctors to start applying the fifth Vital signs - Wikipedia during their routine examination of patients to elicit information about their pain levels and then palliatively treat them with powerful prescription opioids (10, 11), all while repeatedly assuring them opioids weren't addictive (see below from 12, emphasis mine).'Abbott’s relationship with Purdue and its part in building the OxyContin brand are detailed in previously secret court filings unsealed by a Welch, http://W.Va., state court judge at the request of STAT. The records were part of a case brought by the state of West Virginia against Purdue and Abbott that alleged they inappropriately marketed the drug, causing users to become addicted to the opioid. The case was settled in 2004 when Purdue agreed to pay $10 million to the state. Neither company admitted any wrongdoing.The documents include internal Abbott and Purdue memos, as well as sales documents and marketing materials. They show that Abbott sales reps were instructed to downplay the threat of addiction with OxyContin and make other claims to doctors that had no scientific basis. The sales reps from the two companies closely coordinated their efforts, met regularly to strategize, and shared marketing materials.'Opioid prescribing inducements included direct payments to doctors as well. One 2017 study estimated as many as 1 in 12 US physicians and ~1 in 5 family doctors accepted payments related to opioids during the course of the 29-month study (August 2013-December 2015) (13).Such change in prescribing was based not on carefully conducted scientific studies but one mediated by relentless lobbying and marketing, and came into place within the span of a decade from the mid-1990s to the mid-2000s so much so that in 2012, 13 states had more opioid prescriptions than even people (see below from 14, 15). Clearly, change in prescribing (demand) went hand in glove with carpeting of the entire country with a surfeit of opioids (supply).Investigative reporting suggests regulator-opioid maker revolving door also helped grease the wheels.A Los Angeles Times report by Harriet Ryan, Lisa Girion, Scott Glover (16) uncovers how Dr. Curtis Wright, the FDA bureaucrat who led its medical review of Purdue Pharma's OxyContin application in 1995 left the FDA shortly after it approved it and within 2 years began working for Purdue.A piece in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel by John Fauber suggests (see below from 17, emphasis mine) beefing up pain advisory councils with opioid maker-friendly voices also helped smooth the way in expanding usage of opioids in pain treatment,'Federal health industry regulators and executives of companies that make pain drugs have held private meetings at expensive hotels at least once a year since 2002 through an organization funded by the drug companies, according to emails obtained through public records requests and provided to the Journal Sentinel/MedPage Today.Each year a handful of drug companies have paid up to $35,000 each to send a representative to meetings of IMMPACT, where they could discuss clinical trial testing procedures with officials from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and other government agencies. IMMPACT's stated goal is to improve the design of clinical trials conducted to develop new pain treatments.’Such meetings appear to have favored opioid makers even as recently as 2013 (see below from 18, emphasis mine).'The Food and Drug Administration is under enormous pressure to change its mind about a powerful new prescription painkiller. Forty-two public health groups are urging the FDA to withdraw its support of Zohydro. The drug is similar to Oxycontin, except it comes in significantly higher doses. The FDA approved Zohydro last year, despite its own advisory panel voting against it. And critics are, among other things, raising questions about that approval process.’As late in the US opioid crisis as January 2016, a federal government pain advisory panel of 18 had at least 5 with financial ties to opioid makers, connections that came to light (see below from 19),'...after the committee last month bashed a federal plan to recommend doctors scale back on prescribing painkillers for chronic pain. The guidelines by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention are intended to curb deadly overdoses tied to powerful but highly-addictive opioid drugs, including Percocet and Vicodin.'The Center for Public Integrity - Wikipedia also uncovered evidence of opioid maker lobbying of Congress and state legislatures (20), efforts estimated by Mother Jones to be 8X that of the gun lobby and 200X that of those advocating stricter opioid prescription rules (21).Raw numbers reflect the spectacular success of such unprecedented marketing and lobbying. In 1996, annual OxyContin sales were $48 million. For OxyContin's inaugural marketing alone, Purdue doubled its sales force to 600 and spent $207 million, so much so that already by 2000, OxyContin sales grew 23-fold to ~$1.1 billion (22).Already by 2001, OxyContin had become the most frequently prescribed brand name opioid for treating moderate to severe pain in the US, with so much overprescribing that the US GAO issued a 58-page report warning about it all the way back in December 2003 (23).In recent years, other opioid makers such as Insys Therapeutics Inc. (24) and Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals (25) have also come under the public spotlight for their aggressive sales practices, tactics that also applied to antidote makers such as Reckitt Benckiser (26).Like a burst dam, such intense marketing and lobbying ended up transforming how US doctors treat pain, replacing wholesale old true and tried methods that erred on the side of caution to an approach where it suddenly became acceptable to treat any and all pain with extremely powerful opioids (1, 5, 27, 28), a change that a 2016 study (29) suggests had US family doctors and general practitioners at the forefront.Could one seriously argue that from the years 1996 onwards, physical pain and/or existential angst increased so much among the US population as to justify such an increase in opioid sales and consumption? Obviously not. Instead, the US opioid epidemic is inextricably linked to an unprecedented medical culture change in how US doctors were carefully and relentlessly persuaded by opioid makers, their lobbyists and sales reps to treat all manner of pain, not just terminal, late stage cancer pain, with highly powerful opioids.Problem is so far opioid makers haven't been held accountable for their willful recklessness (slaps on the wrist in the form of relatively piddling monetary fines obviously don't count) even as they've saturated the US market. Rather, a report in the Los Angeles Times by by Harriet Ryan, Lisa Girion, Scott Glover suggests that as their profits in the US market start to dry up, their ongoing intense lobbying around the world may end up replicating the US opioid crisis in other countries as well (30). For governments, policy makers and regulators the world over, how to avoid 'globalization of the prescription opioid epidemic' (31) thus becomes a matter of urgency.Bibliography1. Guy, Gery P. "Vital signs: changes in opioid prescribing in the United States, 2006–2015." MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report 66 (2017). https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/66/wr/pdfs/mm6626a4.pdf2. Hedegaard, Holly, Margaret Warner, and Arialdi M. Miniño. "Drug overdose deaths in the United States, 1999-2015." NCHS data brief 273 (2017): 1-8. Welcome to CDC stacks3. Rudd, Rose A. "Increases in drug and opioid-involved overdose deaths—United States, 2010–2015." MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report 65 (2016). https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/65/wr/pdfs/mm655051e1.pdf4. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr64/nvsr64_02.pdf5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC. "Vital signs: overdoses of prescription opioid pain relievers---United States, 1999--2008." MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report 60.43 (2011): 1487. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/wk/mm6043.pdf6. CDC Publications7. Mike Mariani, February 23, 2015. Poison Pill8. New Yorker, Patrick Radden Keefe, October 30, 2017. The Family That Built an Empire of Pain9. Propublica, Charles Ornstein, Tracy Weber, December 23, 2011. The Champion of Painkillers — ProPublica10. Tompkins, D. Andrew, J. Greg Hobelmann, and Peggy Compton. "Providing chronic pain management in the “Fifth Vital Sign” Era: Historical and treatment perspectives on a modern-day medical dilemma." Drug and Alcohol Dependence 173 (2017): S11-S21. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0376871617300030/pdfft?md5=3f2ef3c4ddb2c940d6f48f623ef4cc45&pid=1-s2.0-S0376871617300030-main.pdf11. Harris, Matthew C., et al. "Prescription Opioids and Labor Market Pains." (2017). http://cber.haslam.utk.edu/staff/harris/Opioids_HKMG.pdf12. Stat News, David Armstrong, September 22, 2016. Secret trove reveals Abbott's bold 'crusade' to sell OxyContin13. Hadland, Scott E., Maxwell S. Krieger, and Brandon DL Marshall. "Industry Payments to Physicians for Opioid Products, 2013–2015." American journal of public health 107.9 (2017): 1493-1495. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Brandon_Marshall/publication/319203662_Industry_Payments_to_Physicians_for_Opioid_Products_2013-2015/links/599acf44aca272e41d4089fa/Industry-Payments-to-Physicians-for-Opioid-Products-2013-2015.pdf14. Prescribing Data15. Protect patients from opioid overdose16. The Los Angeles Times, Harriet Ryan, Lisa Girion, Scott Glover, May 5, 2016. http://www.latimes.com/projects/oxycontin-part1/17. Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, John Fauber, October 6, 2013. Emails point to relationship between drug firms, regulators18. Critics Question FDA's Approval Of Zohydro19. Associated Press, Matthew Perrone, January 27, 2016. Federal pain panel rife with links to pharma companies20. Public Integrity, Liz Essley Whyte, Geoff Mulvhill, Ben Wieder, September 18, 2016. Politics of pain: Drugmakers fought state opioid limits amid crisis21. Mother Jones, Julia Lurie, September 21, 2016. Opioids are ravaging the country. These lobbyists want to keep the drugs flowing.22. Van Zee, Art. "The promotion and marketing of oxycontin: commercial triumph, public health tragedy." American Journal of Public Health 99.2 (2009): 221-227. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2622774/pdf/221.pdf23. https://www.gao.gov/new.items/d04110.pdf24. Founder and Owner of Pharmaceutical Company Insys Arrested and Charged with Racketeering25. This company’s drugs helped fuel Florida’s opioid crisis. But the government struggled to hold them accountable.26. Reckitt Benckiser sued by 35 US states for 'profiteering' from opioid treatment27. Boudreau, Denise, et al. "Trends in long‐term opioid therapy for chronic non‐cancer pain." Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety 18.12 (2009): 1166-1175. 6 (2017). https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/66/wr/pdfs/mm6626a4.pdf28. Schuchat, Anne, Debra Houry, and Gery P. Guy. "New data on opioid use and prescribing in the United States." Jama 318.5 (2017): 425-426. https://www.issup.net/files/2017-07/New%20Data%20on%20Opioid%20Use%20and%20Prescribing%20in%20the%20United%20States.pdf29. Chen, Jonathan H., et al. "Distribution of opioids by different types of medicare prescribers." JAMA internal medicine 176.2 (2016): 259-261. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/2474400?version=meter%20at%20null&module=meter-Links&pgtype=article&contentId=&mediaId=&referrer=&priority=true&action=click&contentCollection=meter-links-click30. Los Angeles Times, Harriet Ryan, Lisa Girion, Scott Glover, December 16, 2016. http://www.latimes.com/projects/la-me-oxycontin-part3/31. Humphreys, Keith. "Avoiding globalisation of the prescription opioid epidemic." The Lancet 390.10093 (2017): 437-439.

Rather than using their powers for good, genius criminal minds spend their time figuring out how to pull off the most perfect crimes in history. Keeping this in mind, now I’ll talk about the most intelligent criminal in the history in my opinion.Charles MansonCharles Milles Manson Maddox born November 12, 1934 – November 19, 2017 was an American criminal and cult leader. In mid-1967, he formed what became known as the Manson Family, a quasi-commune based in California. Manson's followers committed a series of nine murders at four locations in July and August 1969. According to the Los Angeles County district attorney, Manson plotted to start a race war, though Manson and others involved long disputed this motive.In 1971, he was convicted of first-degree murder and conspiracy to commit murder for the deaths of seven people. Although the prosecution conceded that Manson never literally ordered the murders, they contended that his ideology constituted an overt act of conspiracy.Manson was also convicted of first-degree murder for the deaths of Gary Hinman and Donald Shae. At the time the Manson Family began to form, Manson was an unemployed ex-convict who had spent more than half of his life in correctional institutions for a variety of offenses. Before the murders, he was a singer-songwriter on the fringe of the Los Angeles music industry, chiefly through a chance association with Dennis Wilson, drummer and founding member of the Beach Boys. In 1968, the group recorded one of Manson's songs, "Cease to Exist," retitled "Never Learn Not to Love", as a B-sided single, but without a credit to Manson. The Los Angeles district attorney claimed that Manson was obsessed with the Beatles, particularly their 1968 self-titled album (also known as the "White Album") though Manson and other disputed this.Allegedly, guided by his interpretation of the band's lyrics, Manson adopted the term "Helter Skelter" to describe an impending apocalyptic race war. At trial the prosecution claimed that Manson and his followers, who were mostly young women, believed that the murders would help precipitate that war. Other contemporary interviews and those who testified during the penalty phase of Manson's original trial insisted that the motive for the Tate-LaBianca murders were copycat crimes designed to exonerate Manson's friend Bobby Beausoleil.From the beginning of Manson's notoriety, a pop culture arose around him in which he ultimately became an emblem of insanity, violence, and the macabre. After he was charged with the crimes of which he was later convicted, recordings of songs written and performed by Manson were released commercially, starting with Lie: The Love and Terror Cult (1970). Various musicians have covered some of his songs. Manson was originally sentenced to death, but his sentence was commuted to life with the possibility of parole after California invalidated the state's death penalty statute in 1972. He served out his life sentence at California State Prison in Corcoran and died at age 83 in late 2017.Beginning in January 1970, Manson was embraced by the underground newspapers Los Angeles Free Press and Tuesday's Child, with the latter proclaiming him "Man of the Year". In June 1970, he was the subject of a Rolling Stone cover story, "Charles Manson: The Incredible Story of the Most Dangerous Man Alive". When a Rolling Stone writer visited the Los Angeles District Attorney's office in preparing that story,he was shocked by a photograph of the bloody "Healter [sic] Skelter" that would bind Manson to popular culture.Prosecutor Vincent Bugliosi pointed out the dispute in the underground press over whether Manson was "Christ returned" or "a sick symbol of our times" to his Helter Skelter co-author, Curt Gentry.Bernardine Dohrn, a leader of the Weather Underground, reportedly said of the Tate murders: "Dig it, first they killed those pigs, then they ate dinner in the same room with them, then they even shoved a fork into a victim's stomach. Wild!"Neo-Nazi and Manson follower James Mason founded the Universal Order, a group which has influenced alt-right movements such as the neo-Nazi terrorist Atomwaffen Division. Universal Order's name and logo, a swastika between scales of justice, were remotely designed by Manson.In an afterword composed for the 1994 edition of the non-fiction book Helter Skelter, Bugliosi quoted a BBC employee's assertion that a "neo-Manson cult" existing then in Europe was represented by, among other things, approximately 70 rock bands playing songs by Manson and "songs in support of him"On September 5, 2007, MSNBC aired The Mind of Manson, a complete version of a 1987 interview at California's San Quentin State Prison. The footage of the "unshackled, unapologetic, and unruly" Manson had been considered "so unbelievable" that only seven minutes of it had originally been broadcast on The Today Show, for which it had been recorded.In March 2009, a photograph of Manson showing a receding hairline, grizzled gray beard and hair, and the swastika tattoo still prominent on his forehead was released to the public by California corrections officials.In 2010, the Los Angeles Times reported that Manson was caught with a cell phone in 2009 and had contacted people in California, New Jersey, Florida and British Columbia. A spokesperson for the California Department of Corrections stated that it was not known if Manson had used the phone for criminal purposes.Manson also recorded an album of acoustic pop songs with additional production by Henry Rollins, titled Completion. Only five copies were pressed: two belong to Rollins, while the other three are presumed to have been with Manson. The album remains unreleased.Manson was admitted to state prison from Los Angeles County on April 22, 1971, for seven counts of first-degree murder and one count of conspiracy to commit murder for the deaths of Abigail Ann Folger, Wojciech Frykowski, Steven Earl Parent, Sharon Tate Polanski, Jay Sebring and Leno and Rosemary LaBianca. He was sentenced to death. When the death penalty was ruled unconstitutional in 1972, he was resentenced to life with the possibility of parole. His original death sentence was modified to life on February 2, 1977.On December 13, 1971, Manson was convicted of first-degree murder in Los Angeles County Court for the July 25, 1969 death of musician Gary Hinman. He was also convicted of first-degree murder for the August 1969 death of Donald Jerome "Shorty" Shea. A footnote to the conclusion of California v. Anderson, the 1972 decision that neutralized California's death sentences, stated that, "any prisoner now under a sentence of death ... may file a petition for writ of habeas corpus in the superior court inviting that court to modify its judgment to provide for the appropriate alternative punishment of life imprisonment or life imprisonment without possibility of parole specified by statute for the crime for which he was sentenced to death."This made Manson eligible to apply for parole after seven years' incarceration:488. Accordingly, his first parole hearing took place on November 16, 1978, at California Medical Facility in Vacaville, and his petition was rejected.There are many documentaries inspired by Charles-1973: Manson, directed by Robert Hendrickson and Laurence Merrick1989: Charles Manson Superstar, directed by Nikolas Schreck2014: Life After Manson, directed by Olivia Klaus2017: Manson: Inside the Mind of a Mad Man, television documentary about Reet Jurvetsen.2017: Murder Made Me Famous, Charles Manson: What Happened?.2017: Inside the Manson Cult: The Lost Tapes2017: Charles Manson: The Final Words, narrated by Rob Zombie, focuses on the "Manson family" murders told from Manson's perspective, directed by James Buddy Day.2019: I Lived with a Killer: The Manson Family. Dianne Lake discusses what she witnessed of Manson's "peace-and-love hippie philosophy" as it became "dark, dangerous and evil"2019: Charles Manson: The Funeral, directed by James Buddy Day.There are several fictions as well inspired by Charles including-1976: Helter Skelter, television drama1984: Manson Family Movies, film drama1990: The Manson Family, musical opera by John Moran1990: Assassins, Broadway musical with references to Manson.1997: The Manson Family, a crime drama horror film centered around The Manson Family.1998: "Merry Christmas, Charlie Manson!", an episode of South Park centered around Manson.2003: The Dead Circus, novel that includes the activities of the Manson Family as a major plot point.2006: Live Freaky! Die Freaky!, a stop-motion animated film based on the murders.2014: House of Manson, a biographical feature film focusing on the life of Charles Manson from his childhood to arrest.2015: Manson Family Vacation, indie comedy inspired by Manson2015–16: Aquarius, television crime drama that includes storylines inspired by actual events which involved Manson.2017–: Mindhunter, the first episode of season 1 used Charles Manson as a case study. Manson is featured in the second season.2017: American Horror Story: Cult, the seventh season of the horror anthology series American Horror Story.2018: Charlie Says, a film centered around Manson and three of his followers.[110]l2019: The Haunting of Sharon Tate, directed by Daniel Farrands, the film revolves around Tate during the last evening of her life.2019: Once Upon a Time in Hollywood, directed by Quentin Tarantino, the film has a plot revolving around Manson and the "Manson Family".Hope you liked it…Regards..