Nj Court Forms: Fill & Download for Free

First, Virginia will report the violations to the NJ licensing office, so if you're thinking you can avoid points and potential insurance impacts, that's simply not the case. If the same infraction would cause points on your license in NJ, or be reportable to your insurance in that state, it will happen. Both VA and NJ are signatories to the Driver License Compact (see: Driver License Compact).Second, if you cannot physically attend the court dates, you have three choices: (1) just pay the fine and be done with it; (2) contest or request mitigation and have an attorney represent you; or (3) contest or request a mitigation hearing and ask for a rescheduled date when you can appear.The only time it's really worth hiring an attorney is if the consequences for the ticket(s) are greater than the cost of the attorney; they may or may not be able to get the ticket dismissed or minimized -- it depends on the specific facts of the situation. Getting two tickets in just a couple months is not a good background from which to petition the court for leniency, however.

My ex. He actually tried to get full custody of our daughters. One was almost 18 and one was almost 16. He shared an apartment with 5 other men all in their 40’s. The only space my ex had that was his own was his bedroom. Living room, kitchen, bathroom was all shared space. He thought that by getting custody he would get child support and alimony from me. I however had an apartment for just me and the kids. They each had their own rooms and no one else lived with us. He tried asking the court for a home study to decide who the kids should live with. My daughters spoke with my lawyer. Who in turn spoke with his lawyer. His lawyer finally convinced him it wouldn’t go well to pursue that in court. He would lose and then have to pay the costs of the home study.I got the kids, the dogs, the tools and by time my ex finished dragging the whole thing out my oldest was over 18 and no longer part of the custody agreement. I might add that I specifically worded the custody arrangement. There were no set days he got to see my youngest. It was at her discretion if she wanted to spend time with him, talk to him or have any contact with him. She didn’t and hasn’t to this day almost 10 years later.He was (and still is) a violent, mean drunk drug addict who has never admitted to having a problem, has never held a job (except for one time) for longer than 3 months. The one time he did? I drove him to work every day and picked him up after. He hung on to it for a year. He will lie, cheat and steal to feed his habit.Once he called his mother, gave her this BS story about how he and his new GF had moved to Florida (they had) and all he needed was my youngest’s Social Security Number and Florida welfare would send her a check every month. She actually had the nerve to call and ask for the number! My daughter was smart enough not to give it to her. I called my ex-MIL later that day and asked her just how stupid she was. Florida wasn’t going to send a check to NJ. He was trying to claim that my daughter lived with him in Florida to scam welfare. I called Florida the very next day. I sent a copy of the divorce decree and gave them my ex’s name and Social Security Number (I knew it because I always filled out any paperwork for us including tax returns) and told them in no uncertain terms that none of my children lived with him in that state and he did not have the legal right to any benefits for them. The damage he could have done with that number. Credit cards in her name when she turned 18. Loans.UPDATE:I’ve had to disable comments on this because of one person who seems to intensely dislike me because I mentioned that I got “the tools” in the divorce. For some reason that has led this woman to believe that I am some kind of horrible person and she has let me know that she has judged me and I come up lacking in her mind. I don’t know what her issues are nor do I care to find out. But for all those still reading let me put it this way. His own brother wouldn’t take him in. His sister’s husband wouldn’t let him live with them. Eventually even his mother told him no. My ex was not some paragon of virtue that was treated horribly by “my kind” (according to Lucy Merriweather, she knows “my kind” when she sees it and we are all horrible people).So thank you to all who replied and commented and didn’t go off on a rant about something you know nothing about.See you all later!

Your use of the term “assault rifle” implies that you are talking about a rifle that was designed to be full-auto fire capable. A November 1970 U S Army intelligence document (FSTC-CW-07-03-70) first defined “assault rifle” in the English Language. That definition includes: “Assault rifles are short, compact, selective-fire weapons…” {A ‘selective-fire’ weapon can be set and switched to fire either one shot per pull of the trigger or to fire multiple shots each time the trigger is pulled. The latter often being termed ‘full-auto’ fire.} Unregistered possession of such firearms is a USA Federal offense and often an individual state offense as well.This is a very complicated area of U S Law that often changes and becomes more restrictive by bureaucratic administrative interpretation and decree verses any specific law passed by Congress. In addition some USA states passed or adopted their own laws, like The Uniform Machine Gun Act that once defined some semi- auto only or even manual pump action firearms as being a “machine gun” or prohibited item if its magazine capacity was greater than a specified number of cartridges.In the USA, the BATF has long taken, and currently takes, the position that if a firearm was ever capable of full auto fire, it is forever a machine gun as defined by the National Firearms Act of 1934 or simply NFA, today.The fact that it has been modified so that it cannot practically be restored to have full auto function does not matter. The fact that all parts have been stripped (removed) from the receiver (frame) does not matter. The receiver alone, is still a machine gun.For examples: Many U S M14 rifles that were converted by the U S Government’s Springfield Armory in Springfield, MA to become National Match Target Rifles. Certain parts necessary for full auto function were removed or modified. Their receivers were permanently modified by extensive GTAW (TIG) welding to be semi auto capable only. So modified M14 rifles were once offered for sale to Hi-Power and Service Rifle competitors for U S National Match shooting. However, the actual sales of the so modified M14’s were stopped by the BATF.The following 3 paragraphs are an example addition to my original post.The “U.S. Carbine Caliber .30 M1” was the most U S produced firearm of WWII, with over 6 million made. More were made after the war by Plainfield Machine in NJ and by many other commercial makers. {Many commercial makers initially used tons of surplus WWII parts, sold as scrap by the U S Government.} The WWII produced firearm is commonly called the “M1 Carbine” and is much sought after by collectors, today.In late 1944 or early 1945 production of a selective fire (full auto capable) variant began. It was designated “M2”. Plainfield Machine also made marked “M2” variants for export. The only difference for the receiver (frame) is the stamped marking “M2” verses “M1”. To further complicate things, the U S military issued countless “T17” conversion parts kits; and many M1’s had 7 parts of the trigger assembly changed to become full auto capable M2’s that were often left marked (stamped) “M1” rather than being changed to “M2”. Further, some M2’s were sometimes converted to semi-auto only. {The M2 acquired a reputation for being a less than practical ammo waster.} Semi-auto only M2’s are rarely (but sometimes) encountered for sale by unknowing civilians. They are still machine guns at U S Law, even if they contain only M1 (no M2) trigger assembly parts. The “2” stamp after the “M” makes them such.Today, possession of any .30 Carbine receiver marked (stamped) “M2” is possession of a machine gun. Also, possession of just several of the above mentioned “7 conversion parts” (either loose by themselves or installed in a firearm that is still not full auto capable) can still subject you to arrest and prosecution for having an unregistered machine gun. Beware!Many AK type ‘assault rifles’ that fell into U S hands in Viet Nam were permanently converted to semi-auto only, or made permanently non functional, by U S military armorers; and then brought back as war souvenirs in the late 1960’s to early 1970’s. Today (and since the late 1970’s or early 1980’s) they are still machine guns in the eyes of the BATF! Possibly this is the source of your arrest and legal problem.Finally, as stated in my second paragraph, this is a very complicated area of U S law. Even the possession of some parts (other than a receiver or receiver side plate for some guns) that can enable, or are necessary for, a full auto function of a given firearm can be and are considered as having an unregistered machine gun; and subject you to prosecution. {At the moment this includes all “Bump-Stocks”. They have recently been ruled and declared to be NFA items and contraband. Even though you purchased one legally, possession is now a felony. The is no way to make one legal. Anyone still having one would be wise to throughly destroy it. A near useless “piece of shit” is not worth risking arrest, an expensive court battle, and a felony conviction with a likely subsequent ‘Club Fed Vacation’ (prison) over.}It appears that you need a good attorney, experienced in NFA firearms law and in dealing with prosecutors. He/she might be able to deal with the likely Assistant U S Attorney handling your case and get charges possibly dropped or at least reduced, if you are clearly a victim of your own ignorance with no criminal intent. If you are not totally innocent because of ignorance, and have something to offer, then you and your attorney are likely going to need to play “Let’s Make a Deal” with the Feds.