Option To Buy Agreement It Is Hereby Understood That: Fill & Download for Free

Nice idea, but they already have their country: JORDAN.according to INTERNATIONAL LAW Israel is the rightful sovereign between the sea and the river (and the Golan)here is the explanation:Should Israel abandon the West Bank annexation plan?Meir SprecherNO!!!! NO!!!!!Israel should TODAY annex the whole of the “West Bank”.This based on Israel's right to all the lands between the sea and the river according to the international law basic “Terra Nullius”Here some answers I wrote about this right of Israel:+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++This is actually the end of this article, but it is the easiest to understand so I put it in front.On my answers about Israel’s rights to the lands west of the Jordan river I got the following remark:You misread international law principles. I cannot immigrate to Ontario Canada with my cousins and claim the borders of Ontario as my newly formed state. International law does not allow it.The “uti possidetis juris” that newly-formed states should retain the internal borders that their preceding dependent area had before their independence” has a keyword (THEIR). Since Mandate of Palestine was not “theirs”- the Jewish immigrants; But actually shared with other peoples/ethnicity then Israel cannot claim the entire borders of the Mandate of Palestine.I replied as follows:You are right on that, you cannot go to Amsterdam and say this city is mine.But that was not the situation in 1948!!!!Let’s tell a story:In Toronto there are some street gangs: The J….’s and the Mu….’s. They all live there legally as they all have id cards from the Canadian government. They fight and kill day and night. So the government of Canada says enough is enough: “From 1.1.2020 we will leave the area of the city of Toronto and relinquish our sovereignty over that area. They go to the UN and declare that goal officially.On 31.12.2019 they strike the Canadian flag and all Canadian personnel and equipment leaves the city boundaries. From that moment the city inside the city boundaries is “Terra Nullius” and “uti possidetis juris”. And everybody, living that day in the city, who wishes can claim sovereignty over the area.If more than one group wishes to do so, they both need to declare it. If they cannot agree on which portion of the territory goes to which group, war will start between those groups, and the winning street gang will become the sovereign of the area. But if there is only one “gang” that declares independent sovereignty, then there is no legal issue; that group is the sole legitimate sovereign over the whole areaIf street gangs from other places invade the city and take some neighborhoods in control, they are occupiers and invaders.The street gang who won the war and created his sovereignty over part of the city has then the right to take the rest of the city from those invaders/external occupiers.THE SAME SITUATION existed in 1946 when the British left their Indian colonies. The inhabitants became the sovereigns, and as they made war on each other, there were created two nations India and Pakistan.But here the MU… gang never declared sovereignty and cannot come now and require from the J… to return to the 1948 situation. That option was lost to them when they decided to start the wars on Israel with the support of the Muslim world/nations. After having lost war after war the 1948 situation is lost in history.+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++This is the land of Israel!!!! As agreed upon in the San Remo conference of 1922. (See maps a little further). Do you need a magnifying glass to see it????It’s the Blue AND red dot in the middle of an ocean of Muslim nations. And these are not even all the Muslim nations of the world!!! For that you have to include much of the world including from Turkey to Indonesia and all in between.Still Europe (and the Muslim world) doesn’t like the Jews to have their own nation, here is a photo that tells it all:Abbas showing the map of “Palestine” as he sees it in the future:+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++If you are standing on top of the Golan Heights and you open Google Maps on your cell phone, what does the reading say: You are in Syria or you are in Israel?(Or what was actually the plan for the creation on a Jewish state in Mandatory Palestine after WW I?)Michael Davison,Google Maps doesn’t identify the Golan as belonging to any country. However, place names tend to be in English only, as opposed to the surrounding Lebanese and Syrian areas, where place names are in both Arabic and English.There is no international border indicated outlining the Golan, only dotted lines indicating cease-fire lines. The actual legal status of the Golan is in question, since the British ceding the Golan from the “Mandate for Palestine” in 1923 to the “Mandate for Syria was illegal and violated the conditions of the League of Nations “concerning the “Mandate for Palestine”:ART. 5. The Mandatory shall be responsible for seeing that no Palestine territory shall be ceded or leased to, or in any way placed under the control of the Government of any foreign Power.(The Palestine Mandate, San Remo resolutions)Therefore, the Syrian claim to the Golan Heights has no basis in international law.This is what the League of Nations defined as “Palestine” in 1920 at the San Remo Conference:There is no international border indicated outlining the Golan, only dotted lines indicating cease-fire lines. The actual legal status of the Golan is in question, since the British ceding the Golan from the “Mandate for Palestine” in 1923 to the “Mandate for Syria” was illegal and violated the conditions of the League of Nations “Mandate for Palestine”:The top map shows the original “Mandate for Palestine”. The map on the bottom shows what remained after the British finished violating their promises to all concerned ion the Middle East.After the Brits mutilated the Mandate they had been given, only 22% of the entire Mandate allowed for Jewish settlement at all.If the Syrians hadn’t used their control of the Golan to bombard Israeli citizens for 19 years and divert the sources for the Sea of Galilee, you wouldn’t have to ask this question at all.+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++Does the West Bank legally belong to Israel? If so, is it legal for Israel to treat the Palestinians differently?Kjell HYPERLINK "Kjell A. Amundsen (https://www.quora.com/profile/Kjell-A-Amundsen)" A. Amundsen, SM (2011-present)International law establishes the borders of new states emerging from Mandates or colonies on the basis of territorial frontiers at the time of independence. Application of this doctrine (known as uti possidetis juris) to the Mandate for Palestine means that the State of Israel has a legitimate claim of sovereignty up to the territorial frontiers of the Palestine Mandate in May 1948 when Israel became an independent state, inclusive of Jerusalem, the Gaza Strip and the “West Bank”.International law contains several principles upon which legally enforceable borders can come into existence. These include: effective control; historical title; and treaties. In recent years, many legal judgments, including the rulings of the International Court of Justice regarding border disputes in Asia and Africa, and examinations by lawyers regarding issues such as the borders of the new states emerging from Yugoslavia and the former Soviet Union, have emphasized that the most persuasive principle for determining the borders of new states is the doctrine known as uti possidetis juris. The borders of the state of Israel, no less than those of other states, are subject to this doctrine.Uti possidetis juris is one of the main principles of customary international law intended to ensure stability, certainty and continuity in the demarcation of boundaries. The principle acts to clarify and determine the territorial boundaries of newly emerging states by providing that states emerging from decolonization or mandates shall presumptively inherit the colonial administrative borders that existed at the time of independence. In effect, the principle of uti possidetis juris transforms the colonial and administrative lines existing at the moment of the birth of the new State into national borders. The principle applies to the State as it is [at the moment of independence], i.e. to the ‘photograph’ of the territorial situation then existing.In 1947 Britain decided to terminate her stewardship of the Mandate for Palestine and notified the United Nations accordingly. It should be noted that the Mandate itself was not terminated but only Britain’s stewardship of it. Applying the principle of uti possidetis juris to the borders of the State of Israel (the only state to emerge in Palestine upon the withdrawal of Great Britain), the administrative boundaries of the Mandate for Palestine on 14th May 1948 became the borders of the State of Israel that came into existence upon the proclamation of its independence on that date. On 15th May 1948, Great Britain, the Mandatory for Palestine, officially departed. The eastern boundary of the Mandate on 14th May 1948 was the Jordan River, and a line extending south from the Dead Sea (into which the Jordan River empties) to the Red Sea near Aqaba. (The Mandate had originally included the territory of Transjordan, but Transjordan was administratively separated from Palestine in 1922, with the approval of the League of Nations, and granted its independence by Britain in 1946.)It is generally understood that the principle of uti possidetis juris operates retrospectively to the moment of independence, without reference to the territories actually controlled by the new state. Thus, even though the State of Israel, upon its creation, did not have effective control over all of the area previously covered by the Mandate for Palestine, it acquired the borders of the Mandate.The administrative boundaries of the Mandate for Palestine remained effective right up to the proclamation of the State of Israel on 14th May, 1948. It is important to note that the November 1947 UN “Partition Plan”, recommended by General Assembly Resolution 181, never went into effect. Its primary objective was to partition the remaining Israel territory (already reduced - as a result of the separation of Transjordan in 1922 - by approximately 78% of the originally mandated territory) to create independent Jewish and Arab states, which were to work together in an economic union. The principal reason the Plan was never implemented was that the Arabs rejected it in its entirety and chose instead to engage in war, thereby destroying any possibility of the cooperation necessary to realize the economic union and precluding any subsequent attempt to revive the resolution. Owing to the Arab rejection and subsequent military aggression, counter to the UN Charter, the Security Council, even though asked by the General Assembly, took no action to implement the resolution. Likewise, Britain took no action to implement the resolution and it refused to facilitate the Palestine Commission's attempts to do so.Finally, it is strongly arguable that nothing that has happened since May 1948 has altered the legal status of those borders. Specifically, neither the 1949 Armistice Agreements, the 1994 Israel-Jordan Peace Treaty, the PLO’s claims since 1988 to the existence of a “State of Palestine”, nor the Oslo Agreements, have been legally effective to alter the borders of the State of Israel as they existed in May 1948. Moreover, Article 3.1 of the peace treaty between Israel and Jordan recognized that the "international boundary between Israel and Jordan is delimited with reference to the boundary definition under the Mandate" which is significant since it comports fully with the application of uti possidetis juris.Are "Israeli" and "Palestinian" distinct ethnic groups, or is it too recent to say?Genetically there is nobody on Earth who can claim to be genetically 100% descending from a certain historical group of persons. Much too much intermingling has happened, willfully or forcefully.So we have to look at other aspects of the history of a group of persons before we claim them to be an “Ethnic group” Like religion, family and group history, language, personal, family history and self-determination of deciding to declare “I belong to this or that ethnic group.Jews have a long history of about 3000 to 3500 years of many aspects painting a picture of a distinct ethnically defined group or nation.The (so called) Palestinians have none of this at all!!!!They belong to a great group of people living in the area of the former Ottoman Empire. split into tribes, who were used to wander nearly fully free in the area, without official interference.The splitting up of this great “heap” persons into national groups was done under English/French supervision after the collapse of the former Ottoman Empire.Then the nation people of Jordan, Iraq, Yemen and many others came into being. But eve today those people are in principle one great group of what they call themselves “ARABS”The so called Palestinians are but a small minority in this great group, and only in +/- 1964 started to define themselves as a distinct group inside this “Arab” nation.++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++Who is wrong for their actions: Israel or Palestine?Meir SprecherThere is no Palestine. It was called that for a time under Roman rule and later after the Ottoman Empire collapsed by the new English overlords. Indeed, they, the English, were colonial overlords.The problem is the unwillingness of the Muslim world to accept a non-Muslim entity inside the Middle East. Surely not an entity created by the early “Dhimmis” of the Arab world. I mean those non-Muslims who lived in the slums of the Muslim cities for hundreds of years. (Dhimmi=second, third class person)Since the Jews, who were the rightful owners from +/-1500 before Christ until Roman times, started to come back at the end of the 19th century. The Muslim world has tried to destroy the Jewish settlements in what is today Israel from day one. Even if those settlements were legally created by the then sovereign lords of the land.By the way: Most of the land which was private owned, was private owned by absent landlords, living in Damascus or Istanbul. That land was bought by Jewish agencies for prices much above the real value. The not private owned land became national not private owned land of the state of Israel. 95% of the Muslim population were tenants and had no ownership at all. Today there exists a thriving fake document industry in the PLO administered areas.To give you a short history of the legal ownership of the area throughout history I send you two other answers to other questions:+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++Can you justify the building of Israeli Settlements in the West Bank?Meir SprecherYES! YES!For that we need some history. I will not go back 1000, 2000 or 3000 years ago, but start at the last legal owned status of the Levant”The last undisputed legal “ownership” in modern times was the Ottoman Empire. They were destroyed in WW I and England and France took over the management of the whole Middle East, the “Levant” Their legality was universally acknowledged by the then existing League of Nations.The first partition of the area was in 1919/20 when French control was given over today’s Lebanon, Syria and more. (By the way, the Golan height were not included.) The English received control over what came to be known as the “Palestine Mandate” this included today’s states of Israel AND Jordan and the area we now call the Golan Heights.In these International agreements it was CLEARLY stated that west of the Jordan river a Jewish Homeland should be created. According the Balfour declaration of 1917. Hereby giving international legality to this declaration. East of the river there was to be created an Arab nation.The English, beyond the back of the international community, gave in 1922/23 the Golan heights to the French “Mandate of Syria” (=actually they created the states of Lebanon, Syria and Iraq). In 1947 the English, again beyond the back of the international community, gave the area east of the river to some Bedouin tribes as Emirate(=kingdom). Those tribes were not original from this area, but got the prize as they “helped” (today we know that that help was very little) Lawrence of Arabia (=was an English officer) to destroy the Ottoman Empire. Originally they came from more southern area in today’s Saudi Arabia.In fact, they gave 77% of the mandatory area to Arabs who had no place there, leaving the locals with the rest. Due to all out trouble between Arabs and Jews the English decided they had enough and wanted to leave. So they asked for a commission from the today’s existing UN to find a solution. This solution was simple: Divide the resting 24% between Jews and local Arabs. and all is well.The Jews accepted this deal. Better to have a little place of our own than nothing. The Arabs rejected it. Deciding that after the English would leave they could easily destroy the small Jewish community of 600.000 persons. These 600.000 Jews were legitimate inhabitants of the country, in other words: They were Palestinians. This rejection had as result that the proposal to decide the area never reached legal status. To get this proposal legal status at the UN it needed approval of BOTH sided.The English decided to leave. This had the result that the whole area west of the Jordan river became land without legal ownership. There exists a nice Latin name for land that has no legal ownership, but I forgot it.So the day the English left in 1948 the Jews declared their state Israel, but the Arab’s send 5 armies (Egypt, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, Iraq). Funny, but the Arab inhabitants, instead of fighting for their land, ran away, ordered by the commanders of those 5 armies with the words: “You can come back when we have finished the Jews of and take their property”.The world sat back and waited for the slaughter. Most leaders thought and hoped that the Arab armies would finish these cheeky Jewish, who thought that they had the same rights as other nations have. But G’d was this time at our side and we won that war. then the situation was like this. We, the Jews, had created our state as per definition of the original mandate. In other words, legally. But the area’s occupied by the invading armies of Jordan (=West Bank), Egypt(=Gaza) and Syria(=Golan) were illegally occupied. Jordan is the Arab Muslim state created in the original Palestinian Mandate’s East of the Jordan river and had no rights to invade the west bank. As a result, Gaza, the "West bank" and the Golan became area’s without international legal status.This situation stayed until 1967, when the Arabs again thought they could destroy us. Again in this war God was with us and we won again. This time conquering the land that was illegally occupied by Egypt, Jordan and Syria from 1948. As this was a defensive war and the land had no Legal ownership we have all the legal right to claim these lands as being robbed from the area that was originally planned to belong to the Jewish state.So we have all the rights to settle there. Even if the world is against it. If you follow the UN behavior against Israel you quickly come to the conclusion that anti-Semitism is not dead, it is alive and thriving.We live with anti-Semitism some 2000 years. This time we will not freely enter the cattle cars taking us towards our second Holocaust. Like my family did some 75 years ago.But what about the Arabs living here, you ask now. They have their country: It is called Jordan. Let them go there.+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++Were Palestinians stripped of their country before they were considered stateless?Meir SprecherThere never was a Palestinian people. There were (and are) many tribes of original middle east roots who roamed the area freely until in 1918, when the Ottoman empire collapsed.The new lords (England and France) introduced alien ideas, like nation and nationhood, resulting in much upheaval and death.There never existed a Palestinian state, the name was first given by the Romans to the province of Judea. This as punishment for the Jewish revolts in trying to regain our freedom and country back.Back to yesterday. Until 1948 all inhabitants of the area of the “British Mandate of Palestine” were called Palestinians. Indeed, the Jewish first Prime minister David Ben Gurion had a Palestinian passport. It was the non-Jewish inhabitants of the area who refused this title and called themselves “South Syrians” and other names.Until 1967 after the Six Day War the Jordanian gave their name to all. On the day they (the Jordanians) decided they stopped representing the people west of the river Jordan. They told all persons from that area living in Jordan they were no longer Jordanians but Palestinians.In short, there never was a Palestinian people, only many tribes living in the Middle East. There never was a country called Palestine. There exists no history of “the Palestinian People’ before 1967. There exists no Palestinian, city, religion or something which could be interpreted as “Palestinian” if you don’t take in account the word “terror”, or the popular Palestinian culture that has evolved since 1968, under encouragement from the PLO and UNWRA.+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++If Israel has the right to have Jerusalem and Palestine because they’ve won a war/wars, why not Germany or Russia have the right to have parts of Poland because they’ve won a war too?Meir Sprecher⦁ Russia and Nazi Germany ATTACKED Poland, a sovereign state⦁ Israel, a sovereign state, defended itself when it was attackedThis is a basic difference which creates different standards as to the results of wars, and Germany got beaten in the end and lost all areas. Russia created the Eastern European union (Behind the Iron Curtain) to keep control over Sovereign Nations that were invaded.Israel never invaded a sovereign nation to hold its lands, we retreated from Sinai, and (twice) from Lebanon.The West bank and Gaza are occupied areas that were in 1948 Terra Nullius and the international legal term, uti possidetis juris, fits the situation exactly. So Jordan and Egypt were the occupying nations and Israel freed the lands and is its legal owner.+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++Was Goliath in the Bible a Palestinian?Thomas HYPERLINK "https://www.quora.com/profile/Thomas-Warmuth"Warmuth (https://www.quora.com/profile/Thomas-Warmuth"Warmuth), ChristianGoliath was a Philistine, and many people automatically assume that the Palestinians descend from them.Not so. The dirty little secret is that there is no such thing as a Palestinian ethnically. Palestine is a region, but the people who have inhabited it over time have been from various ethnicities.When the PLO was formed, Yasser Arafat (an Egyptian), supported by the KGB, led a movement to stir up unrest among the former Jordanians, Syrians, and Lebanese who had been displaced by both the occupation by the British in British Palestine post World War I and by the creation of the state of Israel following WWII. The home countries of these people refused to take them back into their borders, hoping to create a grass-roots uprising against Israel.Not even the Philistines were native to this region in biblical times. They lived along the Mediterranean coastline between the mountains and the sea, and were descended from the “Sea People.” These “Sea People” were Greeks who formed an early seafaring empire, and these colonies continued on after the original empire had fallen, so the Philistines were a Greek tribe, not of Semitic Middle Eastern roots.+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++What are some things Israel that did, that might be seen as illegal?Mark L. LevinsonI can think of a few.⦁ When France, having sold some boats to the Israeli navy, decided not to deliver them after all, Israel sent a crew to board them and sail away. You might say Israel should have politely gone through the French court system.⦁ When Israel found out where Adolf Eichmann was hiding, it kidnapped him. You might say Israel should have politely gone through the Argentine court system.⦁ When Israel found out that an airplane had been hijacked to Uganda, it sent special forces to rescue the crew and passengers. You might say Israel should have politely gone through the Ugandan court system.⦁ When Ethiopia was unwilling to let its Jewish citizens leave, Israel loaded them onto planes and took them in as immigrants. You might say Israel should have politely respected the Ethiopian government’s authority.+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++What are misconceptions about Middle Easterners that you are sick and tired of hearing or reading or both?Collin SpearsI’m tired of hearing that Palestinians are victims of “evil Zionists” and not just “losers of multiple conflicts initiated by them”, which were attempts to purge Israelis from their homeland. When you lose, people take your stuff…happens in every war. Move on.Instead of lying to Palestinians for 70 years, they (the world, especially the Arab world, specifically Syria, Lebanon, Egypt, Saudi, Jordan) should have absorbed all Palestinians and fully nationalized them and let them move on with their lives. By the time all the people who remember 1948 are dead, it won’t be nearly as big an issue, and once all their children die, then it will be a historical footnote, but the grandchildren will feel local in the nations they are in, so far less likely to engage in terrorism against Israel. However, that’s too rational, so it won’t happen, so instead Palestinians and Israelis will continue to fight and die over something that will never happen. There will never be fully independent continuous Palestinian state, ever. Not going to happen, not as long as Israel has the IDF and nukes. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++Why is Israel planning to illegally annex the remaining West Bank territories and destroy Palestinian land when this is a violation of international law?Michael Davison Updated July 5I would like the OP to specify which international law Israel would be violating before even considering an answer to this question.Please specify the name of the law, the relevant clause, article, section or paragraph and the date that any Israeli government ratified its participation as a contracting party.For the sake of brevity and honesty, please DO NOT:Attempt to present UN resolutions as international law. The UN is not a world government or a legislative body and only has the authority to pass non-binding resolutions that must be accepted by all relevant parties to become binding.Attempt to use the 2004 advisory opinion of the ICJ. Advisory opinions are issued by the ICJ in the absence of relevant international law and are non-binding. When there is any relevant international law, the court hands down decisions, not advisory opinions.Attempt to misuse Article 49 of the Geneva Conventions, which is inapplicable to the issue of Israel:Inappropriate Use of the Fourth Geneva Convention SettlementsThe crux of the matter are two sentences:“Individual or mass forcible transfers, as well as deportations of protected persons from occupied territory to the territory of the occupying power or to that of any other country…are prohibited…”Which has not happened.“The Occupying Power shall not deport or transfer parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies.”Even if we consider Israel as an “occupying power”, no Israeli government has deported or transferred Israelis to the disputed territories by force, nor have Palestinians living in the West Bank been deported to any other country.Since the West Bank has not had a legitimate sovereign since the fall of the Ottoman Empire (Britain, as the Mandatory Authority was never the sovereign of the Mandate for Palestine, only a trustee charged with preparing the local population for eventual self-rule), when the Higher Arab Committee for Palestine “neglected” to declare its independence as an “Arab state” (mentioned in UNGAR 181 no less than 22 times), the land allocated according to the partition plan became terra nullius under international law the moment the Mandate for Palestine was ended.With Jordan being an illegal occupier between 1948 and 1967, when the land was re-taken by the only surviving legitimate heir of the Mandate for Palestine in a defensive war (see the legal opinions in the article “Settlements” above), with the PLO claiming its right to the territory, the land became “disputed territory”, and has never been “occupied territory” since the end of the 6-Day War.Last but not least, the so-called “1967 borders” are nothing of the sort. They are simply the 1949 Rhodes Armistice Agreement lines, denoting the separation of forces at the time of the cease-fire that ended the 1948 War of Independence. The agreements go so far as to describe these lines as “not to be considered recognized international borders by any means”, reinforced by UNGAR 194, which required determination of finalized borders through direct negotiations between the relevant belligerents… a resolution the Arab League and Higher Arab Committee for Palestine rejected in its entirety, making the resolution a piece of waste paper.Now, would the OP like to explain and cite the international law that he believes Israel is violating?++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Terms and ConditionsThis instrument here after referred to as the agreement executed between Applicant and Company. The Company is engaged in the business of Direct Selling through Multi Level Marketing (M.L.M.) and in other business activities as stated in the object clauses of Memorandum and Articles of Association of the Company. The Company authorises Direct Sellers across the country for marketing and sale of its Products and Services. An individual (Indian Citizen only) intended to become Direct Seller can apply for the same in prescribed application form of the Company. There is no fee or charge for becoming Direct Seller of the Company. The applicant must be 18 years of age or above. The Company exclusively uses its website to display the details of the products, marketing methods and business monitoring. It also uses verbal publicity to promote its business. For smooth running, simplifying, keeping transparent, prevention of fraudulent practices and betterment of the business of Direct Selling, the Company has framed certain rules and regulations, marketing plan, terms and conditions etc. These terms and conditions are construed in accordance with model guidelines on direct selling issued by the Govt. of India, Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food & Public Distribution, Department of Consumer Affairs, New Delhi vide F. No. 21/18/2014-IT (Vol.-II) dated 9th Sept, 2016.WHEREAS the applicant has gone through the Company's official website and read printed documents, brochures including stipulated terms and conditions for becoming Direct Seller.The Company and Direct Seller have clearly understood and agreed to abide by the terms and conditions as laid down herein at the time of agreement.NOW THIS AGREEMENT OF DIRECT SELLING WITNESSES AS FOLLOWS:DEFINITIONS:The following words used in these presents shall have the meaning as defined hereunder: -Direct SellingMeans marketing, distribution and sale of goods/products or providing of services as a part of network of Direct Selling.Direct Selling EntityMeans a Company namely M/s. Avencia Life Sciences Private Limited (CIN-U24232RJ2013PTC043945) having its Registered Office at 2, Adarsh Nagar, Bhilwara (Rajasthan) -311001 and Corporate Office at 117/H-1/56, Pandu Nagar, Kanpur (U.P.) - 208005 running its main business in the name and style of SHEERSH which sells or offers to sell goods or services through Direct Seller.Direct SellerMeans a person authorised, directly or indirectly, by a Direct Selling Entity through a legally enforceable written contract to undertake direct selling business on principal to principal basis.ConsumerMeans a person who purchases goods or hires services for personal use/consumption and not for resale or commercial purposes. It shall have the same meaning as provided under the Consumer Protection Act., 1986.Goods / Products and ServicesMeans goods/products as defined in the Sale of Goods Act, 1930. "Services" Means service as defined in Consumer Protection Act, 1986.Cooling-Off PeriodMeans the duration of time counted from the date when the Direct Seller and the Direct Selling Entity enter into an agreement and ending with date on which the contract is to be performed and within which direct seller may repudiate the agreement without being subject to penalty for breach of contract.Unique ID/Track IDMeans Unique Identification Number issued by the Company to the Direct Seller as token of acceptance for direct selling of goods/products and services of the Company.PasswordMeans unique password awarded to each Direct Seller to allow him to log on to the website of the Company.WebsiteMeans the official website of Company i.e.- http://myvestige.com2. THE AUTHORISATION OF DIRECT SELLER AND UNDERSTANDING:After submitting application form to the Company duly signed by applicant, the Company upon scrutiny and verification of the details submitted by applicant in application form may register as "Direct Seller" and authorise him for selling of the goods/products and services of the Company. The Company exclusive reserves the right to accept or reject or decline the application at its discretion without assigning any reason whatsoever.The Direct Seller shall enjoy the following privileges: -Incentive for effecting sale of goods/products and services of the Company as per marketing plan.No territorial restriction to sell the goods/products and services.Search and inspect his/her account on website of the Company through I.D. and password awarded by the company.Incentive of the Direct Seller shall be in proportion to the Business Volume of the Direct Seller either by his personal efforts or through team as stipulated in the marketing plan of the Company.Direct seller shall be entitled to a Cooling-off Period of 30 days from the date of execution of Agreement between Direct Seller and company without any punishable clause.Direct Seller has the option of Buy back or return of currently marketable goods and services purchased by him/her within 30 days from the date of purchase at Direct Seller's request at reasonable terms. The return of the products must be supported with bill of purchase and such products should not be damaged any angel. The purchaser should insure that quality and condition of the product should be similar to the quality and condition which was prevailed at the time of purchase. Such return shall be governed by the return policy published on website of the Company.An individual, upon appending his/her signature at the bottom of this application form shall be deemed to have accepted the terms and conditions stipulated herein. Upon registration after scrutiny of the details submitted by applicant in application form, he shall become the Direct Seller of the Company. Allotment of password and ID shall be construed as registration as Direct Seller.The applicant hereby covenants that as under: -That he has clearly understood the marketing methods/plan, the compensation plan, its limitations and conditions. He/She agrees that he/she is not relying upon any misrepresentation or fraudulent inducement or assurance that is not set out in terms and conditions or other officially printed or published materials of the Company.Relation between the Company and the Direct Seller shall be governed, in addition to this agreement, by the rules and procedure mentioned in the marketing plan available on website. The Direct Seller further confirms that he/she has read and understood guidelines and terms & conditions carefully and agrees to be bound by them.Direct Seller shall act as freelancer. He shall not commit any misfeasance or malfeasance to create any liability/obligation on the Company of whatsoever nature.Direct Seller shall be responsible for paying all taxes whether direct or indirect including but not limited to income tax, GST and other taxes chargeable to Direct Seller on amount earned hereunder. All legal, statutory, financial and other obligations associated with Direct Seller's business shall be the sole responsibility of Direct Seller.It is made and understood in very clear terms that Direct Seller is not an agent, employee, an authorised representative of the Company or its service provider and shall not be entitled to any employee's benefits. He/She is not authorised to receive/accept any amount/payment for and on behalf of the Company. Any payment/amount received by him/her will not be deemed to be received by the Company and the Company shall take necessary action against such Direct Seller.Direct Seller shall keep proper book of account stating the details of the sale of products, price, tax, quantity etc.Direct Seller hereby declare that all the information furnished by him to the Company are true and correct to his/her best of knowledge and nothing is concealed. Company reserves the right to take any action against the Direct Seller in the event of it is discovered that the Direct Seller furnished any wrong/false information to the Company.3. GENERAL TERMS:The Company may appoint any person for collection/distribution services. Direct Seller is required to visit the Company's official website from time to time to get such appointment and avail facilities, make payment, collect valid receipt and products/services from its outlet/permanent retail centre.Direct Seller shall use his/her best efforts to promote the sale of goods/products and services and maximize them. Direct Seller shall also provide reasonable assistance to Company in promotional activities.The Direct Seller will be eligible for remuneration as per business volume of sale of products and services done by him/her subject to the eligibility of norms formulated by the Company from time to time according to marketing plan and not in any other form/manner is payable/given.Track ID has to be quoted by the Direct Seller for all his/her transactions and correspondence with the Company. The Track ID once chosen cannot be altered at any point of time.No communication will be entertained without unique ID and password. Direct Seller shall preserve the ID and password properly as it is "must" for logging on website.Incentive to the Direct Seller shall be subject to statutory deductions under income tax and other acts as applicable for the time being in force.The Company reserves right to withheld/block/suspend I.D. of the Direct Seller in the event of the Direct Seller fails to provide any detail as desired by the Company from time to time.Direct Seller undertakes to adhere to policies, procedures, guidelines and rules & regulations formed by the Company.The Direct Seller shall be faithful to the Company and uphold the integrity and decorum of the Company and shall maintain good relations to other Direct Sellers and his/her clients.Company reserves the right to modify the terms and conditions, Products, Marketing Plan, Business and other policies at any time without any prior notice. Modification shall be published through the official website of the Company or any other mode as Company may deem fit and proper and such modification/ alteration and amendments made by the Government from time to time, shall be applicable and binding upon the Direct Seller from the date of such modification/alteration.If any Direct Seller loses his contractual capacity due to any reason or in case of death of Direct Seller either his nominee or one of the legal heir with consent in writing of all the legal heirs, may join the Company as Direct Seller in place of incapable or the deceased provided he executes written agreement and undertakes to abide by all rules and regulations and terms & conditions etc. in the same manner as that in case of original Direct Seller. In case of failure to arrival at such consent within six months from the incapability or death of the Direct Seller, the Company shall be at liberty to terminate the unique I.D. and for this period the Company will keep his unique ID in abeyance.Direct Seller shall be abided by all statutory, central, state and local body laws, rules and regulations and guidelines in operation of Company's business. Direct Seller shall not engage in any deceptive of unlawful trade practices as defined under different statutes.Direct Seller shall not manipulate the Company's marketing plan, products and services, rate, B.V. etc. in any way.Direct Seller shall not send, transmit or otherwise communicate any message to anybody on behalf of the Company without any authority from the Company.Direct Seller or any other person under him is strictly prohibited to use promotional material, other than the developed and authorised by the company.Direct Seller shall not use the SHEERSH trademark, logotype and design anywhere without written permission of the Company and the said permission can be withdrawn at any time by the Company.Direct Seller shall be self-responsible for all arrangements, expenses and permissions from Central/State Government and local bodies for conducting meetings or seminars.Direct Seller shall bear the cost and expenses of conducting its business in accordance with these terms and conditions. The Company will not entertain any reimbursement on any expense made by the Direct Seller other than sales incentive earned by the Direct Seller as per the marketing plan.Direct Seller shall carry his/her Identity Card issued by the company and not visit the consumer premises without prior appointment/approval. He shall not use I.D. Card apart from Company purposes.Direct Seller shall not sell any product for a price exceeding Maximum Retail Price (M.R.P.)Direct Seller shall not make medical claim for the effects arising out by using the products of the Company.4. PROHIBITIONS/ RESTRICTIONS:Direct Seller or his/her relatives (relative means dependent son or daughter, father/mother, spouse) shall not engage in any activities of Multi Level Marketing of any other Company/Person. If it is found, such direct seller shall be terminated.Direct Seller is prohibited from listening, marketing, advertising, promoting, discussing or selling of any product or the business opportunity on any website or online forum that offers like auction as a mode of selling.The Direct Seller hereby undertakes not to compel or induce or mislead any person with any false statement or promise to purchase products or services from the Company or to become direct seller of the Company.5. DUTY AND CONFIDENTIALITY:Direct Seller shall keep and maintain secrecy and confidentiality and shall not disclose the secret information to anybody.6. SPECIAL CONDITIONS:Notwithstanding anything stated or provided herein, the Company shall have all powers and discretion to modify, alter or vary the terms and conditions in any manner or mode as the Company deems fit and proper and shall be communicated through official website. If any Direct Seller does not agree to such modifications/ alterations, he may terminate his agreement within 30 days of such publication by giving a written notice to the Company. Without any objection to such modifications/alterations, if Direct Seller continues his/her business activities, it will be deemed that he/she has accepted all modifications/alterations for future.7. TERMINATION:Company may terminate this agreement on ground of any reason which shall not be limited to the following: -On non-compliance with the provisions of the marketing plan and discipline of the Company.For reason of non-performance with the business activities of the Company.For any unethical or prejudicial work to the interest of the Company.For breach of any term and condition of this agreement and marketing plan.In case information given by Direct Seller is found to be misleading/wrong/false.If he/she is found to be convicted on any offence punishable under law for the time being in force.If he/she is declared bankrupt/insolvent.If he/she is not mentally sound or physically fit to handle the business.If he/she migrates to other country.Where a Direct Seller is found to have made no purchase/sale by himself/herself of goods/products and services for a period of two years since the date of joining as Direct Seller or where there is no purchase/sale of goods/products and services for a period of two years since the date of last purchase/sale made, the company shall have the right to terminate the agreement by giving thirty days notice in writing or by electronic means to the direct seller.Where Company deems it necessary to terminate the Direct Seller in the interest of other Direct Sellers connected with his/her group/team.The Direct seller may terminate this agreement at any time by giving written notice to the Company.A. Termination of a Direct Seller means termination of.All rights and entitlements as Direct Seller of Company.Personal information given on websiteIdentification as Direct Seller of CompanyRight to go at any Company's office and attend Company's meetings/seminars.All the Company's trademarks, trade names, data, photographs, literature, sales aids and all kinds of customer related database and any other information generated shall always remain the property of Company. Within five (5) days after the termination of direct seller, he/she shall return all such items to Company. Direct Seller shall not make or retain copies of any confidential item or information that may have been entrusted to him/her and upon the termination of direct seller, he/she shall cease to use all trademarks and trade names of Company.8. RENEWAL / AGREEMENT PERIOD:Direct Seller authorisation shall continue till the end of twelve months from the date of acceptance of application by Company. To continue the authorisation as Direct Seller of Company for next one year, the Direct Seller shall have to renew his/her authorisation on or before the last date of expiry of twelve months. In case of failure in submission of renewal application within stipulated period, the authorisation shall be ceased automatically.Renewal application is available on Company's website in personal information. Direct Seller has to apply for renewal through his/her login.Company reserves the right to refuse any renewal request and can revoke agreement if, in Company's opinion, the activities of the Direct Seller are not in the interest of Company or the Direct Seller has failed to comply with the rules, procedures, guidelines, terms & conditions etc. during the twelve proceeding months.The agreement will automatically come to an end in case of non-compliance of renewal formalities.9. FORCE MAJEURE:The Company shall not be liable for any failure to perform its obligations where such failure has resulted due to acts of nature (including fire, flood, earthquake, storm, hurricane or other natural disaster), war, invasion, act of foreign enemies, hostilities (whether war is declared or not), civil war, rebellion, revolution, insurrection, military or usurped power or confiscation, terrorist activities, nationalization, Government sanction, blockage, embargo, labour dispute, strike, lockout or interruption or failure of electricity, any type of redirection by Government (Central/State), Local Authority etc.10.DISPUTE SETTLEMENT AND ARBITRATION:If any dispute or difference arises out of or in relation to this agreement including any question regarding its existence, validity, termination or terms and conditions, the company and Direct Seller shall endeavour to settle through mutual discussions within 30 days of such dispute arising. In case of dispute or difference is not mutually settled within period, it shall be referred to Grievance Redressal Committee of the Company. If Direct Seller is not satisfied with the decision of Grievance Redressal Committee and dispute or difference is remaining unsolved, the same shall be referred to sole Arbitrator appointed by the Company in accordance with the provisions of Arbitration and conciliation Act, 1996 as amended from time to time. The arbitration proceedings shall be conducted at Kanpur in the state of U.P. and language shall be English. The decision of Arbitrator will be final and shall have binding effect on the both parties to the agreement.The terms and conditions stipulated in the forgoing paragraphs shall be governed in accordance with the law for the time being in force in India. Disputes, either civil or criminal in nature, shall be subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the court in Kanpur (U.P.) only.11. SMS. ALERTS:The Direct Seller agrees to receive the SMS Alert from the company on Mobile No. mentioned/ quoted above and will not object even if they are received despite of DND activated. Direct Seller shall intimate the change in Mobile No. (if any).