Moving Timeline Rex: Fill & Download for Free

It depends on which Star Trek you’re going off of.In TNG the Borg are ancient, and completely dominate an entire quarter of the galaxy. Nothing stands against them. Nothing can hurt them. They move slowly, methodically, logically, and give nothing in return. They slowly analyze new species when they come across them and when finally combat begins, they have absorbed their new foes’ unique technological advances and have developed the perfect defense for fighting them.The power from the Borg comes not from their raw strength, which they certainly have, but their incredible and vast technological knowledge. They have a scientific response for everything.. such as one for whatever weapon you use. They can adapt to it and nullify it. Somewhere in their bag of tricks is the perfect way to stop whatever it is you are doing. You should note, they’re not just generating super strong shields. When they’re hit with something they have adapted to, it just out right isn’t dangerous to them. It’s not a weapon they have to tank. It’s energy they have completely dispersed or nullified somehow. They don’t even notice it. Like absorbing a punch with a pillow, or deflecting a light with a mirror, to use some more simplistic examples. They’re using just the right tech to handle the situation.Then Voyager came along, and immediately retconned around 99% of everything we know about the Borg. They are a much smaller faction than before, who move even slower at everything, and do not have the ability to grow their own numbers. They do not have an actual functioning hive mind. Their queen is basically more immature than a primarch. And they’re basically blocked off from expanding by various super powers in their quadrant, such as the Voth, who have civilian ships that could body anything in 40k, let alone Borg Cubes. They’re losing a war to a faction that can blow up planets on the spot with just 8 ships (There was a TOS episode where the original enterprise was sloooowly losing a battle with an unrecognized alien ship that alone could do the same thing with its main gun, that it was also repeatedly battering them with, to put this in perspective of how much weaker everything is in Voyager). The Borg are idiots who have no way to actually expand, no way to grow, and no way to get more powerful. Their only real technological innovation is a new form of FTL travel that they’re using to get around their issues.It’s pretty sad stuff.If we were to use the TNG Borg, I’d say yes. They would do extremely well. Agriworlds would just go dark sometimes. Traders would vanish. Then over time, patrols would begin to lose contact with Terra. The Borg would be probing the Imperium, learning their technology, and so on. They would initially appear as horrifyingly silent blanks, because Star Trek doesn’t have warp attached souls. But the unified souls of those collected from 40k’s galaxy would begin to grow more cohesive.. grow louder. The Borg Hive Mind would slowly begin to get ever more noticeable in the galaxy as it grew over the centuries. Where the Borg come from, and what the Borg want, who they are.. would all be unknown to the Imperium. But they would have all races counted among their ranks.If we follow them to the latest point in their timeline, which would be Star Trek Online, the Borg eventually have the ability to assimilate entire planets very quickly, they develop new war cubes called “Tactical cubes”, and their numbers sky rocket. They don’t have a technological edge on the Federation anymore, but they are catching up. They still have the most powerful plasma weapons in the galaxy, which is their primary weapon, and they produce city sized ships akin to V’Ger which are deployed in very small groups, usually pairs. Their war with the Undine (Species 8472) continues, and they are able to keep their numbers up despite the Undine’s entire strategy being “Drop in to their reality, IMMEDIATELY BLOW UP THE PLANET, then leave.” Their raw force they can put out lets them play on the same level of not just the Undine, but the Voth as well, and the three routinely will throw down in massive three way battles, their enormous vessels forming the backdrop to the levels they’re encountered on and taking up so much space that you literally can’t see the space behind them.TNG Borg probably are still the most powerful here. TNG era was still a big fan of science over brute force and technobabble. It was not difficult for them to drill to the core of a planet in but a split second with a single phaser shot for the purpose of science in that show. There’s still the kind of over the top style of science fiction that you tended to see in 60’s and 70’s science fiction novels being employed here, just with not so much focus on combat. We’d probably see the Borg easily adapt to nullifying most weapons used against them in 40k because the show is still written with science in mind, and this was understood.Voyager Borg are probably the weakest.STO Borg will do well in 40k, They will assimilate entire planets at the drop of a hat, which is very in theme with the over the top nature of 40k, and they throw down with planet busters now with little concern. So they can definitely muscle their way through Nova Cannon shots. They would make for a good faction to play both in the table top game and in battlefleet gothic. They have a lot of fun variety to them and new abilities and vessels. If we were to insert any version of the Borg in to 40k, this is the one that we would derive the longest entertainment value out of. But their numbers rise and fall so swiftly that a singular, cohesive, horrifying, warp-present hive mind probably won’t establish itself the way the TNG Borg’s methods would result in such.

- Would a polar or grizzly bear stand a chance against a Tyrannosaur rex? -- According to research in palaeontology and excavations of dinosaurs, the scientists have established that most of them had feathers by as little or maybe they were entirely covered in feathers like big fat birds. We actually have no idea how did they really looked like so the way Hollywood presenting them is absolutely erroneous.- When dinosaurs had feathers we can safely assume their way of life and fighting techniques which would be very similar to that of non flying birds like chickens for example.- So, when mentioning T Rex we could assume he had fighting techniques similar to like today's modern birds.- On that manner, we can answer your question by another question:- How the rooster for example could fight against the polar bear if the rooster is 14 tons in weight, 5 metres tall, 12 metres long and has 60 teeth in his beak where many of his teeth are 30 cm in length?Everyone of you have seen the rooster fight once in your life.How would one of them would fight against the polar bear if they had the T Rex dimensions?Image source: COCKFIGHTING IN PUERTO RICOLet's show the approximate realistic look of the T Rex:Source: https://funnyjunk.com/channel/----ing-science/Fluffy+trex/DkqrLQx/Addition- Some people have pointed out in the comments below how the T Rex was a scaly reptile based on the alleged skin imprints of his skin that were found hardened in the ground and how the T Rex couldn't have feathers because of its sheer size so we need to address that here.The T Rex was a scaly reptile based on the skin imprints found - WRONG- The skin imprints that were found are the size of postcard and were made by 12+ metre large animal which means it's impossible for anyone to talk about the skin of a large organism leaving such a small imprint of its skin; we cannot state its skin was scaly based on a small skin impression it left simply because of the giant size of an animal that left a skin imprint the size of a postcard.It's like I make a small pouch like impression in the ground with my hand and you conclude that Emir is marsupial.Look at this impression of the T Rex's skin:Source: World’s only fossils of T. rex skin suggest it was covered in scales—not feathersNow, which animal/s can leave such impression in ground too?Source: The Cabot’s tragopanBased on the size of this bird, it would leave small imprint on the ground by its left cheek, the same with the T Rex leaving its imprint when compared with its size: the T Rex will leave bigger impression because of its large size.So, can we conclude that a Tragopan bird is a reptile if it left its skin imprint in the ground; specifically its left cheek?Here's more:Source: T. Rex Was Likely Covered in Scales, Not FeathersSource: MM* Wake-Up Call: What? Have YOU looked in the mirror? funny-turkey-picture-face-close-cool | Chickens backyardOn this second imprint picture it's guessed that it was made by T Rex's neck.Maybe roosters are reptiles too.Tyrannosaur Rex couldn't have feathers because of his size; it would be too hot for such an animal to exist when compared to the elephants which have almost none of the bristle due to their size; they would be cooked on savannah's temperatures - WRONG- The fur of the mammals is different from the feathers and we can say that feathers are even better in protection from high temperatures.- We will start our case in Australia, comparing the Emu, Australian endemic, second largest bird in the world coming from the Ratite species or flightless birds, weighing to 50 kg being 1,80+ metres in height with the Red Kangaroo.Emu's soft feathers absorbs 83% of solar radiation which is 22% more than the fur of kangaroo which absorbs 61% of that radiation.Besides the emu's feathers special colouration which even more contributes to the heat regulation, these feathers are deeply layered where the upper layers capture the radiation, dispersing the heat away and the thickness of the lower layers prevent the majority of heat to reach this bird's skin.That results in the fact that the kangaroo's skin receives 25% more solar radiation than the emu's even though kangaroo's heat load is lower.That's why, on Australian hellish temperatures, the kangaroo is more nocturnal while the emu is more diurnal type of animal.This means it would be even better to have more feathers to withstand high temperatures than to be almost naked or furry.Stray Feathers: Reflections on Science, Behaviour and Evolution of the Birds, page 74Source: Stray Feathers- Let's move further. We all know about the biggest bird in the world, the Ostrich, which can grow almost 3 metres in height and weight even 200 kg.- Then we have an Elephant Bird, 700+ kg in weight, over 3 metres tall endemic ratite bird of Madagascar, extinct since 1200 AD.Source: Extinct Elephant Bird Aepyornis Maximus Madagascar Stock Vector (Royalty Free) 1303871368- Then we have the Terror Bird that lived from 62–1 million years ago.Source: Terror bird, artwork - Stock Image - C001/3501- We should also know that the temperatures in the cretaceous period were lot higher than today for example, the annual temperature on the area of modern Germany in Eocene roughly 50 million years ago was 23–29°C greater than today according to the simulation of the scientists in this link below:Source: Scientists Have Uncovered a Frightening Climate Change Precedent- Furthermore, we know about the Yutyrannus (who’s fully feathered) that lived from 130 - 113 million years ago in the Early Cretaceous period where the cool temperature from Jurassic period started to rise again and reached its peak around 90 million years ago and again started to go down. We know that the T Rex was living around 80–70 to 65 million years ago when the planet started to cool down again.Cretaceous Thermal Maximum - WikipediaSource: Yutyrannus hualiConclusion- Based on all facts above, we can understand the timeline as it goes further in the past (excluding the Ice Age since we live in another warming up period of the Earth), temperature goes higher, animals get bigger and yet they again, have feathers no matter how big in size they grow nor the temperature that is rising.- Now we can tell that the Tyrannosaur Rex had feathers no matter its size and he needed even greater, more layered feathers to protect it and cool its body in the extreme (compared with today's) temperatures of the Cretaceous period.UNTIL THE NEW EVIDENCE PROVES DIFFERENT.Read the comments below to have more of insight into how the T Rex was fighting.Thank you for reading,

Nam-Myoho-Renge-Kyo.To answer this question, its best if tell you some of the time travel thought experiments I have thought of over my life, and it should give you an idea of what is possible, and what is not possible, if you have an actual time machine.If you have a time machine, you need to be able to lock up the time period you left from causality effects, effecting it.Imagine if the time machine you had could move things from the past, from the future.Move a quark out of place in an atom in a grain of sand, on a beach 1000 years ago.Something as little as this, is enough to change the whole history of the earth from that point on.If you watch videos on the grandfather paradox it is a misconception that you can have enough time to stand in front of him to pull the trigger, let alone have a conversation with him.But how can you exist if you were always going to go back in time, and kill your grandfather?I believe that it can be set in stone that you will go back in time, and kill your grandfather, but you will not vanish from existence until you actually visit, and tear a hole in the space in the past.So there was one scenario where you existed in a timeline, then when you went back, and killed your grandfather, you created a whole new timeline where you do not exist.But there was always a timeline that once existed with you in it, that has vanished, and that is now gone.Click on the YouTube video (below) to see the mad scientist paradox.So you cannot go back in time and get the winning lottery numbers, you cannot kill Hitler, stop Pearl Harbor attack, you cannot save JFK, or stop September 11th.Another example is if you went back in time after the super bowl final, and moved this football in the field (above) out of place by a foot, this would completely change the score of the game from what the score was originally.You can only change these things if the time machine can lock up causality effects from the past you visited, so causality effects do not effect you, and so you can return to the future you came from without anything have changed.But the changes would never count in reality you came from, just the other dimension you went back into, and messed around in.If a machine can do something as amazing as recreate the past, then locking up causality should be no problem for the time machine to do.Maybe people from the future go into the past in the technique I described above, or have the technology to view the past from the future on a television monitor, without visiting the past in person, and causing causality effects.These are the only three ways I can think of that do not effect causality.In the diagram above just imagine timeline 2 is the recreated past in another dimension, where anything you do, and change does not effect time line 1, the timeline where you came from.So after doing what you wanted to do in time line 2, you just go back into timeline 1, a second after you left to be safe, because the same matter cannot occupy the same space.Lets say for a minute we could reverse time.As you reversed time backwards the time machine would have to split you into a kind of a other dimension (like in the picture above) because the same matter cannot occupy the same space, if this does not happen there could be a scenario where you meld with your older self in the past as you reverse into time in the past.It would depend how your time machine works, but there could be a scenario like this in the picture (above) where Han Solo is melded into carbonite, where you meld with your previous self as you reverse into time in the past, because there is now two of you in the past, and you are occupying the same space.It would be a lot safer to reverse time backwards slowly, while adjusting your place in space as you reverse time.It would be dangerous also to vanish from the present, and re-appear in the past because of factors like the earth is in a different place in the past, from where you are in the present, and the same matter cannot occupy the same space.Or, imagine a room where time reverses, you would have to live in this room for a period of time so that there is information, or an event to reverse in the first place.So you stay in the room for lets say a year, then you push the button to reverse time, for exactly 1 year.So you would step out of the room, after a year of time reversing backwards, and you would have no memory of time reversing, so from your perspective you would step in the room, and step right back out of the room instantly, with no memory of being inside the room for a year, but 2 years have passed for you from your perspective.Imagine that in the image (below) is every moment in space, and each, and every moment in time, that has ever existed from the big bang.Maybe it would be better to send a cubic area in space back in time rarther, than send the whole of space back in time.Its also very spooky, and mysterious how electrons are able to get through a wall with enough momentum (like in the diagram below, click on the diagram to see the electron animation) maybe the electron is time traveling into the past to a place before the wall was up.In another causality experiment I thought if its the interactions with people, and other things which cause causality, then what if you went back in time into a solid thick steel container, that was buried ten miles deep down in the in moons crust, it would be one mile thick in every direction up, down, left, right, forwards, and backwards.You MAY be able to subdue causality effects from going back in time.So if you go back in time into the container on the moon, it should not create any causality effects, because you do not interact with anything.Click on the picture (below) if it is too hard to read.The ripple effects of causality have been subdued.There would be dampening systems in the container to stop your vibrations, but it may not be enough, and not work at all.Just interacting with the air molecules could be enough to cause causality, even the space in the container.Dark matter, and energy is still not understood, and time travel into the past into the steel container could have an effect on the way dark matter, and dark energy effect other objects, to maybe cause causality.In this thought experiment which really cannot be confirmed to be correct.Imagine a really long line of people, standing on a platform, stretching from earth to Pluto.At there closest Pluto is 2.66 billion miles away from earth, it would take light just over four hours to get to Pluto.So the last person in this huge line of people would be standing on Pluto, if you placed a camera on the last person, at say 12:00pm, and recorded exactly what the person was doing, for say 1 minute.So if you went back in time to 11:55am, to the front of the line of people on earth, and you did something different, like say hello to the first person in the line.Would the ripple effects of causality travel through the whole line of people from earth to Pluto instantly?So at 12:00pm the last person in line who is standing on Pluto would the person be doing different things, than before in the 1 minute camera recording.If you you recorded the persons new actions on camera for a 1 minute would they be different, or exactly the same?You going back in time has sent ripple effects of causality through all those people, right up to the last person in the line, for the person to be doing what he was doing differently.The point is this is a instant change, in a straight race between the speed of light, and causality effects traveling through people, and other objects, from going back in time, are ripple effects of causality faster?So are ripple effects faster than light?Causality ripple effects are an invisible force, but they do have an effect on things.Things like dark matter, dark energy, air, gravity, and sound are all invisible but you can see the effects of them on things.So why are causality ripple effects no different, the change of what the last person in line was doing, after going back in time, is proof of a change, and an effect on something even though the force is invisible.So what's faster the speed of light, or ripple effects that travel through people from going back in time, and changing something?What do you think?In this next causality thought experiment it possibly proves that aliens never built a time machine, BUT it only proves they never did it from a certain time period, and if causality is a problem they cannot get around.In this picture there is around 10, 000 galaxies, according to the best estimates of astronomers there are at least one hundred billion galaxies in the observable universe.They've counted the galaxies in a particular region, and multiplied this up to estimate the number for the whole universe.Which kind of gives me hope that the aliens probably have a time machine, but this next causality experiment tells me they possibly did not.You could use an infinite amount of examples to choose to do this next causality experiment, but I am just going to use a T-Rex skeleton, and my own time lifeline from November 3rd 1981, to the Present, to demonstrate this causality experiment.If aliens had a actual time machine, and were time traveling all the time we would never know, there would be no way to tell, but if they can not get past the time travel causality problem with the technology they have, they would probably kill themselves each time they went into the past, if they went into the past into long periods into the past, because of the Grandfather Paradox rule.Click on the diagrams below if the text is too small, and hard for you to read.Below is a arrow of timeline of around 65 million years, from the time the T-Rex in the photo was around, to my own timeline of 3rd of November 1981 to the present up to Febuary 28th 1016So this real T-Rex Skeleton (below) existence has been set for around 65 million years or more.No causality effects in time have affected the T-Rex’s existance in the last 65 million years.The blue arrows show where the aliens time traveled from, to the point where to, in the 65 million year timeline.👽🛸The aliens could have time traveled an infinite amount of times before the T-Rex was born, up until the last point where they stopped time traveling.This changed history for the T-Rex to be born, and me. (If the aliens were ever time traveling at all🤷‍♂️)The aliens could have gone back in time AFTER the period the T-Rex was around, and this changed history for this specific T-Rex in the photo to be born, right up until the last point the aliens stopped time traveling.The aliens could have gone back in time a infinite amount of times from way into the future, back to before 65 million years, or more, and this changed history for the T-Rex, and me to be born.Remember when aliens time travel into the past, they would create a new timeline of new things happening in that time, whatever existed in time from before the aliens went back in time is now gone.So to sum up I cannot prove aliens have been time traveling in these time periods.But what I can prove in the next experiment (below) is that they cannot, and have not been time traveling in ANY time period while I have been alive from November 3rd 1981 to Present day Febuary 28th 2016If the aliens did any time traveling in the period i was alive from Novemeber 3rd 1981 to the present day Febuary 28th 2016, I and the T-Rex would just vanish becaise of causality effects, and the Grandfather Paradox rule.Example, if the aliens did any time traveling just once from 1985, to any time period before the T-Rex was born, the T-Rex and I would just vanish because of the time travel causality rule.Because I am still alive, and the T-Rex is still alive, and I can go to the museum, and touch the T-Rex, and there are memories of the T-Rex in my mind, so there has been no time traveling by aliens, not even once, in the universe, and beyond further in space.Any time traveling done by aliens from 1981 to today me and the T-Rex vanish because of time travel causality rules.So in this experiment proves that any aliens have not done any time traveling in the last 35 years, IF the aliens time travel technology cannot find a way to to stop the effects of causality from traveling back in time.But this experiment does not disprove aliens have not been going back in time from other time peroids like way in the future.You can do this causality experiment with any 2 things, for example you could do it woth a living creature that has lived longer than the T-Rex, like the organism Coronacollina acula, at between 550, and 560 million years old, an animal discovered in South Australia recently is the oldest with a skeleton ever found.Organism Coronacollina Acula in the picture (below)The most visited place by a time traveler if possible, would be the bookstore depository (picture below) where Lee Harvey Oswald shot JFK back in 1963, at the exact moment he shot him, or the Dinosaur period.Maybe there is some clues around there of future time travelers, especially in the Zapruder film of JFK being assassinated.Some people think this lady present at the JFK assassination is a time traveler, they call her the Babushka Lady.Some people think time will stop, or reverse when the speed of light is broken.I think that time would continue to stretch with time dilation.Speed of Light (c): Light travels at a constant speed of 1,079,252,848.8 (1.07 billion) km per hour.That works out to 299,792,458 m/s, or about 670,616,629 mph (miles per hour).That is just a random number.If you could see a light clock, on a light beam exceeding 670,616,629 mph, I doubt you would see it freeze, and stop, but this is my opinion, I could be wrong.As for going back in time, by exceeding the speed of light, I doubt that would happen also.If you could see the behavior of a light clock as it travels at the speed of light.You would see the the beam move from the top of the clock to the bottom, and back to the top again, to complete 1 second, as the light clock moves forward through space.If you are not familiar with what a light clock is you can see how a light clock works in this video below, you can skip to 17 minutes, and 20 seconds to see the explanation about how a light clock works.So you see the light clock create a V shape, as it moves from the top to the bottom, and back to the top again.So no matter how fast you are going the V shape is just going to get longer, and longer as speed increases, from point A, to point B, even if the distance from point A, to point B is googolplex long amount of distance in light years.The V shape of the light clock, would never stop growing longer as speed is constantly increased, or stop, or reverse, why would it, it can’t.Even if it takes a googolplex amount of time in light years for the light clock to move vertically by 1 cm, time has not stopped, message me if I am wrongIn this other thought experiment it is possible to double the time dilation rate you would get, because it is not possible to travel faster than the speed of light.I emailed the thought experiment to a physicist at Princeton University, and he confirmed it to be correct.He said “I was free-styling with the laws of physics.”Now this though experiment is totally impractical, and just as impossible from happening as traveling faster than light, but it is a way of doubling the time dilation rate.Say there are three identical twins, called twin A, twin B, and twin C, and they are all the same age 20 years old.Twin C lives on earth, twin B is on a rocket ship traveling at light speed, and twin C is in a small rocket ship, small enough to fit inside twin B’s larger rocket ship.If twin B travels for 1 year at the speed of light in his rocket ship, from twin B’s perspective his brother, Twin A on earth will be 70.4 years older because of time dilation.So after the trip twin B is going to be 21 years old, and twin A is going to be 90.4 years older.Now this is the complicated part, imagine for a minute that twin B’s rocket ship is really big, and long horizontally, long enough for his brother twin C to travel at the speed of light inside of twin B’s rocket ship, in a westerly direction.So what is going to happen is that twin C is being already carried at the speed of light, in twin B’s rocket ship in the north direction, so as he travels at the speed of light in a westerly direction he is getting double the time dilation rate.Remember twin C is already being carried at the speed of light, as he travels at the speed of light in the westerly direction inside twin B's rocket ship, this it what doubles the time dilation rate.Or you could just imagine the black circle (below in the diagram for you to see) is the path twin C traveling at the speed of light in long circles inside a very large, and very long horizontal space ship if this is easier.If twin C travels for a 1 year from his perspective, his brother twin B is going to be 90.4 years old, and his brother on earth twin A is going to be 160.8 years old.If twin A could live to be 160.8 that is.Totally impractical, but it works, and it is a way to double the time dilation rate without traveling faster than light.Short term time travel though like 10 seconds into the past, I am unsure about the outcome, in this thought experiment it might help you.The time is 11:45 a.m. a time traveler decides to visit himself in the past, he would go into the past at 12:00 p.m. exactly, to go back in time to 11:50 a.m.He would go back in time from across the room from himself, (because both time traveler's cannot occupy the same space).So at 11:50 a.m. he knows that he will see another copy of himself appear from the other side of the room.But he says to himself before the time travel experiment, “that no matter what happens, it must be set in stone that I must go back at 12:00 p.m”Because if he does not, who is the other person standing across the room from him.So can the time traveler visit himself, have a conversation with himself before going back in time?I am unsure to what's the answer:Will time and space, not be able to handle this paradox, and causality would instantly kill him.Causality would thrust him instantly somewhere else, but not kill him.If it is allowed a endless loop would be created, where time would never go past 12:01 p.m. ever. Because it was set in stone that the time traveler would always go back in time at 12:00 p.m. no matter what happens.Both time travelers are unaffected, by causality, and the time traveler remembers his other self visiting him, just before he visits himself in the past, and all this is allowed to happen in physics.As the time traveler meets himself, he sees his other self go into past at 12:00pm, and an endless loop is not created, and time goes on for him from that moment.Orbiting a black hole to time travel into the future is a lot safer than using a neutron star, because of gamma waves, would be tearing your rocket ship apart, and there would be a problem with the landing, because the fastest-spinning neutron star ever found has been discovered in a crowded star cluster near the center of the Milky Way, a new study reveals.The star rotates 716 times per second, and has an escape velocity of about 33% the speed of light.Which means that any object caught in a neutron star’s gravity would be accelerated to a tremendous speed.If you are not ripped apart during your descent (you would be), all of your atoms would most likely be destroyed upon impact, for the most part you would be turned into a pile of neutrons.It just is not possible to make a man made neutron star, to then keep adding matter to it to collapse it into a black hole, to try and use the black hole as a natural time machine.Because there is just not the means on earth technologically, to force electrons, and protons into neutrons to make a man made neutron star.Like a medium sized star does with its strong gravity.Then there is the problem of getting the material to build a neutron star.There is more material (atoms) in a 20 kilometer neutron star than all material in the solar system.Let's say you could get enough material, and force it together with enough force like in a medium star, to make a fairly small stable piece of neutron star matter, you could park it next to a star to get the rest of the material to grow in mass, to collapse it into a black hole.The material from a star would be neutronified, by the small piece of neutron stars gravity, and the neutron star matter would grow in mass, then collapse into a black hole.This is probably the closest thing humanly possible to ever to building a time machine, and even then its impossible to do currently.So the problem is getting the matter to make the neutron star, and forcing the matter into one place with enough force.If you could remove a cubic piece of neutron star matter from the neutron star, it would expand and violently explode, because there is nothing holding it together with enough force.The best thing to do is to time travel into the future orbiting the black hole, a lot safer also.There is also this YouTube video below, of Stephen Hawking explaining how to a black hole can be used to time travel into the future, by orbiting the black hole.The best documentary I ever saw about time was Brian Greene’s Fabric Of The Cosmos: The Illusion Of Time (below) in the YouTube link.Also Michio Kaku’s four part Time series is excellent, in the YouTube link (below)Also look at Ronald Mallet's time machine on in the YouTube video in the Worlds First Time Machine link above, but it can only send information back to the point when it was switched on.Hope these thought experiments helped you understand more about time travel, and what we can, and cannot do.The universe I believe is just a area of planets, stars, and galaxies in space.Space, and time is ultimately everywhere in all directions, and maybe if you travel far enough through space, like a vast distance like a googleplex in light years, you would reach a point where space, the up, down, left, right forwards, and backwards, and time, as we know it ends, and something else begins, a place with no space, and no time maybe, and its something out brains cannot comprehend.Maybe its a place where the physics of time travel are possible🤔 but how do we get there?Time travel is interesting to people because people want to go back in time to fix their personal problems.But even if you go back in time you will still remember those bad events even if you fix them.Depending on the situation, and circumstances, possibly it would be better to erase the memory of the event from your mind, it would be more simple to do that than go back in time to fix the problem.That is what I am working on below.If you are interested please look at my idea for a human memory erasing machine, the link to see the idea is in another Quora answer below.Nicholas Xee's answer to How do I forget a bad memory?