Proposal For Delivery Of An: Fill & Download for Free

Why did the LG of Delhi reject the proposal of the doorstep delivery of 40 services? What was wrong with this proposal?There was nothing wrong with this proposal, just the difference of opinion between the LG of Delhi and the Delhi government. It isn't the first time when LG has rejected any ambitious project of the AAP lead Delhi government, it had happened multiple times be it Maholla Clinic, Mohalla Shabha, JanLokpal or Aam Aadmi Centeen.Since, you might not be aware about the issue,so read it here.[1]The Delhi government planned to deliver 40 services (30 additional services to be added each month) at the doorstep of the Delhites including driving licence, caste certificate, domicile and new water connection.The applicants would have to give a call to the Delhi government and a representative (Mobile Sahayak) of the Delhi government will visit them at the time of their convenience.The Mobile Sahayak will be having necessary equipment, he will fill the form and upload the required documents.And the desired document will be delivered directly to the applicants via home delivery.However, the LG of Delhi rejected the proposal and has cited several reasons to justify his action, I'm listing them along with point wise reply of them given by Deputy Chief Minister of Delhi (Manish Sisodia) in a press conference.[2]In the digital era, doorstep delivery service is not needed.Sisodia’s reply: People standing in queues for already digital services, said they had to come to submit affidavits. Is this digital delivery? No, We scraped off 199 affidavits after that. Home delivery is a way to ensure digital delivery.Out of 40 services, 35 were already digital, hence no need of doorstep delivery.Sisodia’s reply: Exactly. Still 25 Lakh people have to go to government offices for the same. Why? Because it is half baked, we are talking about 100% digital delivery.Close the gaps between digital delivery, no need of doorstep delivery.Sisodia’s reply: Doorstep delivery is nothing but closing the gaps between the half baked digital delivery.Setup Suvidha Kendras/ Kiosks instead of doorstep delivery of services.Sisodia’s reply: Kiosks have been tried by numerous the goverments in India. It is a failed model. Jeevan Kendra for example, was failed model in Delhi.Doorstep delivery of governance compromises on safety and security of the citizens.Sisodia’s reply: So, Pizza Delivery, Post Services, LIC agents, and Bank agents are dangerous. E-commerce industry is successful because of doorstep delivery. Why wouldn't it be here? Should citizens should start talking their latters and services from post offices and bank rather?Corruption may increase with doorstep delivery of services.Sisodia’s reply: Corruption is because, citizens have to pay bribe fed up of going from one desk to another. With executive coming at home and a full proof feedback system, there will be no scope of Corruption.Citizen's documents may get lost in the doorstep delivery system of services.Sisodia’s reply: Documents were lost in government offices after repeated submissions. There is no question of loss of documents when executive will scan the document and return it to the citizens.Doorstep delivery may result delay in delivery of services.Sisodia’s reply: Delay? What can be faster processing than executive reaching at residence at the choice of time of the citizens, be it 8AM or 11PM.Field trips and traffic will increase with doorstep delivery of services.Sisodia’s reply: According to our survey with 255 people who came to transport department and 214 from the revenue department almost all of them said that they had to make 2 or more trips to Government offices.Doorstep delivery will result in pollution due to field trips.Sisodia’s reply: A field trip by trained executive and multiple trips by citizens, reducing to zero will save time, money and would reduce pollution too.Service charge for doorstep delivery service would be a burden for citizens.Sisodia’s reply: A large section of users of our survey tells that they spend up to 100 on the one trip, multiply it with the number of trips. Nominal service charge compared to that would rather ease the burden.Go for 100% digital delivery instead of doorstep delivery.Sisodia’s reply: This is super-digitalisation, it is ensuring the outcomes of digitalisation. Dire need to understand the project.As everything question has been already answered by Manish Sisodia, I think that I don't need to add my bit, it will only lengthen the answer.Meanwhile, Delhi government has re-sent the current proposal along with answers to queries of the LG followed by the meeting between CM Arvind Kejriwal and LG of Delhi.[3]Edit (15 January, 2018): Congratulations Delhites, the proposal is finally approved by the LG of Delhi, enjoy the doorstep delivery of services by the Delhi government.Thanks for reading.Footnotes[1] Delhi govt to deliver 40 public services at doorstep frm 2018[2] Manish Sisodia Press Conference on Door Step Delivery Of Public Services[3] Kejriwal urges LG to approve Doorstep delivery & Quality Health schemes - Medical Dialogues

LG not approving Doorstep delivery [1] because it’s another master stroke by Arvind kejriwal and AAP government after Mohalla Clinic, Subsadised Power, Improvement in education, Free lifeline water.Doorstep delivery of ration will plug Big revenue leakage. It’s will save lot of time of beneficiaries. It’s going to be a huge hit and very popular.Or you can say LG stopped it because BJP want to copy this master stroke. They want to take credit of it. They want to stop delhi government from doing it and propose it themselves.Yes[2]Yes, central government also asking states to deliver ration at doorstep.But, they are not approving Delhi government project despite regular reminders.[3]But it’s ok.Whenever something like this happens. It’s reminds me a dialogue of Arvind Kejriwal.We are here, not to do politics. We are here to change politics.People should get Doorstep delivery of ration and other services. Whosoever provides it be it Kejriwal, Modi, Gandhi or LG.Cheers to Modi Ji.Footnotes[1] L-G ‘rejects’ Delhi government’s doorstep delivery of ration[2] Deliver PDS grains at doorstep to check starvation death, Centre tells states[3] ‘Reminders on doorstep delivery of ration ignored’

Amazingly, it's about as anti-free market as it gets, replacing individual consumer decision with government selection of products.It's "let's cut the benefits to those undeserving layabouts," repackaged in the hope that we will be fooled.But we aren't:Trump's plan to replace food stamps with food boxes is his meanest idea yetBay Area officials 'outraged' at Trump food stamp proposalTrump wants to cut back on food stamps for the poor and substitute with packaged food deliveriesTrump Administration Wants To Decide What Food SNAP Recipients Will Gethttp://www.chicagotribune.com/business/ct-biz-food-stamps-snap-changes-20180213-story.html