Forensic Discharge Summary: Fill & Download for Free

Warren Commission ErrorsAt Work:1. No staff of investigators; near-total dependence on informationgathered by others, while claiming to conduct "an independentinvestigation." In its "Forward to the Report," it openly boasts that ithad the power to grant immunity, but never used it.2. Too much emphasis on getting it over with, at the expense of leadswhich even their own staff thought important, while claiming to conducta "thorough" investigation.3. The decision not to request access to the autopsy photos and X-rays,much less not to request evaluation by qualified forensic pathologists.4. The decision not to question Jack Ruby away from Dallas.5. The decision to assume Oswald's guilt at the outset, and theadversarial attitude toward witnesses who didn't assume it.6. The failure to aggressively pursue records held by less cooperativeagencies, like the military, the CIA, etc.7. The decision not to make its evidence files available for study byscholars, and instead to seal them until 2039, and the small printing(5000) of the volumes of evidence that were released, with no allowancefor a second printing based on demand.The Report:The Narrative: How the Commission Wanted You to Look at the Evidence1. Secret Service agent Clint Hill didn't push Mrs. Kennedy back intothe rear seat; she was returning to the seat before he reached her. (after she reacheda piece of her husband's head that went to the rear of the limo.)2. Although they precisely indicated the location of the wound in thefront of the neck, all they said about the head wound was that it was "extensive,"thus evading the Parkland doctors, reports that it was in the rear ofthe head.3. In a misleading statement, the body reportedly "was given a completepathological examination." From the standpoint of forensic pathology,this is utterly false. Even from the standpoint of hospital pathology,it is questionable.4. It implies that the head wound described in the autopsy reportmatches the descriptions from Parkland, when in fact it didn't even match most ofthe descriptions by Bethesda personnel.5. It ascribes accounts of shots from locations other than the TexasSchool Book Depository to "evident confusion at the outset," and suggests thatthe actual sole source, the Depository, was identified "within minutes." TheHouse Select Committee on Assassinations found witnesses and evidencethat supported a shot from the grassy knoll "some of them known to theWarren Commission,” but disregarded or subjected to hostile questioning.6. "Several eyewitnesses," it said, reported a rifle being fired fromthe Sixth Floor window. In fact, only one, Howard Brennan, reported seeing itfire.7. They report the suspect description broadcast by Dallas Police was"based primarily on Brennan's observations," though it included detailsBrennan could not have known.8. They give Oswald extra time to get down the stairs, saying "Not morethan 2 minutes had elapsed since the shooting" when Officer Baker andTSBD supervisor Roy Truly dashed up the stairs. In fact, no more than aminute and a half, and possibly less, had elapsed by the time OfficerBaker confronted Oswald in the second floor lunchroom. This kind ofshading of facts in the direction of a conclusion resembles aprosecutor’s brief more than the objective analysis claimed by theCommission.9. "On the bus was Mrs. Mary Bledsoe, one of Oswald's former landladies,who immediately recognized him." They fail to note that she reported theelbow of his shirt was "torn out," which wasn't accurate, and the busdriver later suggested the passenger may not have been Oswald, but ayoung man who was a regular on that run of the bus, Milton Jones.10. They noted that Oswald took a cab, but omit that he offered it to awoman who arrived after he did, as the narrative is slanted to suggestOswald was in a big hurry.11. The narrative has Oswald talking with Officer Tippit through a carwindow that was rolled up, not down.12. Reporting that Domingo Benavides called the shooting in at 1:16,they imply that this was done almost immediately, which wasn't the case.The shooting could have occurred as early as 1:10, but that didn't leaveenough time for Oswald to get there from his rooming house.13. Neutrally, we are told "The assailant ran into the lot, discardedhis jacket and then continued his flight west on Jefferson," but notthat no one had any success connecting the discarded jacket to Oswald.14. In describing Oswald's teenage years, no mention is made of the factthat his family was deeply enmeshed in the Marcello crime organization;his uncle worked for Marcello, and his mother dated Marcello employees.An odd man with Mob and intelligence connections, David Ferrie, headedthe unofficial Civil Air Patrol unit that Oswald joined. The "loner"also belonged to an Astronomy Club.15. The second description of Oswald as a "loner" comes in the summaryof his Marine career. Anyone who believes that should read his friendKerry Thornley's novel based on their time in the Marines, "The IdleWarriors," or read the accounts of his Marine buddy Nelson Delgado. TheCommission account is fiction by selection.16. He spent time overseas, we are told, "most of it in Japan." That'sall we learn about that unusual period, where he frequented the QueenBee, an expensive nightclub out of the price range of a simple Marine.Also avoided is any mention of the Atsugi base at which he wasstationed, a center of both U-2 and MKULTRA CIA operations.17. The Commission implies that Oswald could shoot well, and explainshis low rifle test scores as an indication that he wasn't interested inthem.18. The highly unusual circumstances of his discharge are glossed over.He was released to care for his mother, on whom several boxes had fallenat work months before. It's true that she was injured, and had adifficult time for a while, but she was doing better by the time he wasdischarged, and he only spent three days with her before leaving forRussia.19. The Commission mentions the odd fact that Oswald applied for apassport, saying he intended to go to Russia, before he left theMarines. What is not said is that his superior officer. Lt. Ayers, wasaware of this, as he signed a form which included that intendeddestination.20. There is mention that he entered the Soviet Union via Finland, butnot that he somehow knew that Helsinki was the easiest entry point.21. There is no mention that he told the U.S. embassy he intended togive the Russians information he had learned in the Marines. Perhapsthis made it easier for them in not having to explain why the StateDepartment later loaned him money for his return.22. His time in Russia is also quickly skipped over, thus no mention ofthe circle of friends "the loner" developed there. His wife seems tocome out of nowhere.23. In it's rush to emphasize the Dallas Russian-speaking community’sdislike for Oswald, the Commission completely omits any mention ofGeorge DeMohrenschildt, a worldly sophisticate who is often described as"Oswald's best friend."24. The Commission flatly states that Oswald tried to kill General EdwinWalker, despite the fact that the bullet recovered from the scene wasnot compatible with his rifle. It only "became compatible" after theassassination, when it turned out to be a different kind of bullet thanDallas Police had reported it to be in April.25. We learn that Oswald returned to New Orleans,·but not that he returned to the milieu of the Marcello crime family.·We are also not told of the many employees of right-wing private detective Guy Banister who remember Oswald as another Banister "employee"·or the students at Lousiana State University who recall seeing Banister and Oswald visiting the campus together,·or the editor of a CIA-supported newsletter on Central Americawho reported seeing them on the street, and in Mancuso'sRestaurant (in the same building as Banister,s office. David Ferriealso worked with Banister.26. We're told that he visited the Mexico City embassies of Cuba and theSoviet Union,·but not that someone continued to pretend to be him after he left, in a callto one embassy.·One of the rumors the Commission doesn't debunk (or mention) is thepossible affair Oswald had with the Cuban embassy's Mexican secretary,though in this case they had the documents reporting it. Not the sort ofthing a loner would do, apparently.27. In mentioning that Oswald rented a room from Mary Bledsoe briefly,it restates (again probably incorrectly) that she saw him on the bus afterthe assassination.28. Although the summary said Ruth Paine phoned the Texas School BookDepository about a job for Oswald "at the suggestion of a neighbor," butthe neighbor had told her she didn't think they were hiring.29. The Commission implies that Oswald had not visited his wife at thePaine home on a Thursday, prior to November 21, but in fact this was hissecond Thursday visit in the relatively short time he had been back inDallas.30. The Commission says Oswald left "his wallet" with $170 for his wifethe morning of the assassination, but it wasn’t his wallet. He had putmoney into HER wallet. His wallet was in his pocket at the time of hisarrest (a detail the narrative omits, presumably to avoid contradictingitself). The falsehood adds to the picture of finality the Commissionseeks to paint. The reality is much less clearcut.31. The Commission's Oswald placed "a long, bulky package" in the rearof Buell Wesley Frazier's car, but neither Frazier nor his sister, whoalso saw it, described it as long enough to carry even the disassembledrifle, and it seemed light enough that Frazier, who had worked in adepartment store, believed Oswald's statement that the package containedcurtain rods.32. The Commission says Frazier saw Oswald carry the package into theDepository, but that's not true. The only employee who actually sawOswald enter the building, Jack Dougherty, said Oswald wasn’t carryinganything.33. The Commission says that "positive firearm identification evidencewas not available at the time," failing to add that there was never aballistics match made between Oswald's pistol and the bullets fired atOfficer Tippit. Lamely, they report that the pistol was of a type thatcould have fired the bullets.34. Of details given the press by the Dallas Police, the Commissiondismissively stated: "Some of the information divulged was erroneous."The same could be said of the Commission.35. Jack Ruby, we learn, was in the crowd of newsmen shouting questionsat Oswald that Friday night. We aren't told that he knew more aboutOswald's political activities than did District Attorney Henry Wade, atwhom he shouted a correction. Of course, Ruby probably spent more timein New Orleans than Wade, and he got his strippers from the Marcellocircuit there. Maybe he didn't need to rely on the news media forinformation about Oswald.36. We are told that numerous threats against Oswald were called in topolice. We aren't told that Officer Billy Grammar, who took one of thecalls, identified the caller as a familiar voice, Jack Ruby. He stalksOswald, he makes a phone threat, and then, on a "sudden impulse," heshoots Oswald. What a coincidence!The Conclusions: What The Narrative Was Preparing You to Believe1. We hear again that "witnesses" saw a rifle being fired from the TSBDwindow.2. We're told that a bullet matching Oswald’s rifle was found atParkland Hospital on Governor Connally’s stretcher, but it was in factfound on the stretcher of an injured little boy, Ronald Fuller,according to the man who found it.3. We have here the false claim that the Single Bullet Theory "is notnecessary to any essential findings of the Commission," though withoutit a lone assassin would be impossible.4. Though no one saw the Mannlicher-Carcano in Oswald,s possessionafter he left New Orleans, the Commission informs us that it was "wasowned by and in the possession of Oswald" on the day of theassassination. Producing evidence of this is apparently also "notnecessary to any essential findings."5. Also on no evidence, we are told that "Oswald carried this rifleinto the Depository Building on the morning of November 22, 1963."6. And we have only the word of Howard Brennan that "Oswald, at thetime of the assassination, was present at the window from which theshots were fired."7. We are told that "the improvised paper bag in which Oswald broughtthe rifle to the Depository was found close by the window from which theshots were fired." How unfortunate that none of the witnesses who sawthe bag Oswald actually carried recognized the bag reportedly found onthe Sixth Floor.8. The claim that Oswald attempted to kill General Walker is hererepeated.9. Oswald is convicted as Tippit’s killer, partly based on a matchbetween cartridge cases in evidence and Oswald's pistol, but the Officerto whom the cases found at the scene had been given was unable to findhis initials in the cases matched to Oswald's pistol. Damningly, we aretold that Oswald owned the pistol that was found in his possession(duh!). Then we’re again told the falsehood that "Oswald's jacket" wasfound abandoned.10. We are told that Oswald was given the opportunity to obtaincounsel. We aren't told that he asked for an ACLU attorney, and theDallas Police turned away an ACLU attorney, telling him that Oswalddidn’t want his assistance.11. Oswald's opportunities to speak directly to the press in thehallway of the Dallas Police Department are described as "harassment"that shouldn’t have been permitted, as it failed to protect his rightsto an "orderly interrogation."12. The Commission found no evidence of a conspiracy, because itcouldn't tie Oswald or Ruby to one or to each other, it said.13. The Commission couldn’t figure out a motive for killing thePresident, either, so it offered a list of possible "contributingfactors."14. One of these is "His inability to enter into meaningfulrelationships with people." At the time, people who had known Oswaldwell were living in fear that they would be accused of beingaccomplices. As time went on, we’ve learned about more of these"meaningful relationships" he supposedly didn’t have.15. The Walker shooting, now taken for granted as an Oswald act, isused to show his "capacity for violence."16. Apparently the Commission's finding "that the FBI took an undulyrestrictive view of its role in preventive intelligence work prior tothe assassination" is another way of saying the FBI failed to pass onreports of Mob threats against Kennedy to the Secret Service" oops, theFBI didn’t tell the Commission about them, either. They didn't reallycome out until the late 1970s.What we find is that the Commission's presentation of evidence was no more objective than the much criticized Oliver Stone film "JFK," but in a different direction. The narrative is slanted to support the conclusions, and the conclusions often rely on errors made in the narrative, and on statements for which there is no evidence, or evidence pointing in a different direction.

I quite like doing Sherlock, being an introvert and preferring to guess things rather than ask or telephone. Sometimes, however, asking is not an option… So I’ve become a self-styled forensic IT specialist, too.I will tell three stories. Some details may have been intentionally changed to keep people’s information private. :)The easy one:The Strayed Letter.The postman delivers a letter with driving authority response clearly visible in the letter window. Says on the letter (address is handwritten) it is for number 72 on my street but that’s my house, and my last name is definitely not the one on the letter. Hmm!The postcode on the letter is correct. In the UK, street/postcode relationship is usually either 1:1 or occasionally 1:2, rarely otherwise. My postcode has one whole street in it. So, the street must be correct.The Englishman/woman would probably write 1 as I (simple vertical dash). However who said that the person who wrote the address was English? On the next, real close, look into the number, it’s obvious that what the postman thought was a 7, is actually a 1 with an elongated left dash, but long dash of 1 is slanted to the right, so the resultant looks like a 7.The rest is easy. I walked up number 12 and rang the bell. “Oh, thank you, we thought they forgot us!”Case solved. People’s problem alleviated.The medium difficulty one:The Mystery of the Forlorn Bin.I walked my dog after a stormy night and found a recycling green bin marked “80” with open lid, lonely lying on its side on the pavement (rubbish strewn all around). It was obvious it was not from here, the number 80 present only on one street in our block and that number being among my neighbours; I knew their bins number font as ours often stood next to theirs on the collection day.Storm or not, however, the bins don’t fly in the air (usually :) on their own. Storm was strong but not that strong. However I’ve seen a few kids in the vicinity (our parish is wealthy, but surrounding ones are not — gentrification in its fullest) which tried to throw bins under passing cars. This must be them bastards doing it.Now I wanted to return it to its lawful owner (walking my dog). However the seedy district didn’t really invite to walk much through three dozens of little “streets” and “closes”. I let it be and went home, where I took Google maps; bummer again, there was no way to know the house numbers, not in England…I loaded the postcode map and compiled the list of postcodes closest to us within one mile. Loaded them into Royal Map scanner one by one and each street I checked for maximum numbers — most of them were short and only lasted up to 30–60. I found four streets with numbers higher than 80. One only had odd numbers higher than 80, exclude that. Three.Tomorrow morning, I went to walk my dog again and visited all three streets. One of them had only black bin (general rubbish) at the house and no green one, and the font of digits attached to it matches. Bingo!! In the evening, I picked up the forlorn bin and while walking the dog, rolled it quietly to the people’s house. Knocked the door and asked if they haven’t lost a bin. It was them! Glad to see their bin back, as otherwise they’d have to pay for a new bin.Case solved! Screw you, good-for-nothing kids. Rightful owners have reunited with the bin.Here’s a full-fledged case. (Some minor details are changed and omitted for clarity.)The Sh-IT-ty Employees Society.In one of the companies I worked for, there was a man working for the same department, let’s call him Steve (not his real name), who was quite arrogant, and a major pain in the arse for colleagues and the department head. Problem with him was, he was quite vocal, challenged each and every thing we asked him to do, but failed to show good work for this attitude. He cut the corners, always was in haste so other people had to finish job after him, and several times his blunders tarnished the department image and led to company being fined by regulators.However this is the UK and once the probation period has ended, it’s extremely difficult to make a person go. We chose the strategy of three warnings, as is the legal way to make an underperformer redundant. But Steve kept avoiding our traps masterfully — and continued to wreak havoc; most colleagues started to refuse to work with him. The situation became grave, he was damaging the entire department.I came up with the idea that he must get the information from somewhere. Since people who worked on this were quite trusted, I thought he is reading emails he should not have access to. (IT can do that, however they won’t get away with it, everything is logged in good houses, and the logs themselves are duplicated to prevent tampering.).The logs however failed to show his desktop system having access to sensitive mailboxes. Hmm, said I, and filtered out who had access to Head’s mailbox. Mostly it was the Head himself, but some of them showed mobile access with some funny ID. This was not the ID of Head’s corporate mobile. He also denied he used other phones to read his mail. Red flags went up in my head. But how do I know whose mobile is that?An epiphany happened when I went into corporate support system logs to look for the same ID. Bingo! Samsung Galaxy 4 phone of the same ID was used with Steve’s corporate account all the time. Gotcha…But I suspected that the problem could be deeper. I filtered mail server logs to see who else goes into mailboxes which are not theirs (legitimately or not), and where else his mobile ID had access to. Turned out: Steve was peeking into Head of HR’s mailbox on his phone a few times a day (considering he was often called into HR), and some other CxO people... (the Board of Directors).Then I checked these new mailboxes for unauthorised access and found that “Mike”, Steve’s one of few buddies, also had been peeking into mailboxes he should never, ever peek.I just collected the evidence, made it solid, forwarded it all to the Head. The only thing he could say was: “Oh, FUCK…” He was often working late, so didn’t go home that night and went on studying the information and printed out the relevant stuff, which took him the best part of that night. Next day, I was out of the office for half a day, and when I came to work, there was neither Steve, nor Mike present. I asked the Head about it, and two words made it all. “Gross misconduct”. The guys had fully confessed and admitted constantly reading VIPs mails on their mobiles. “We were anxious about our fate, so had checked these boxes, to be ready”… It turned out that “Mike” was also in proceedings with the HR for some less than brilliant behaviour. God, what a nasty feeling. Like you find bugs in your bed.Summary Dismissal. In the Army that’d be a Dishonourable Discharge. They were escorted out by security to never return. No non-statutory severance as well. Good riddance buggers.Instead we were able to hire decent guys who won’t steal or go where they shouldn’t, respecting the IT profession where the trust is essential.

Well, Mr. Larry Boyer, I have invented several novel and un-obvious technologies relevant to the energy sector and the agricultural sector; based on your profile, perhaps you would like to engage with me on an investment level? You can read about my story in Wes Hansen's answer to How would a homeless person spend $100?.I was formerly a highly qualified Mechatronic Development Specialist - although thanks to the FBI I have been unemployed for the last decade and have a very undeserved criminal and “mental health” (delusional disorder they claim) histories. My basic knowledge of ASME and robotic type fitting and welding should still be solid; my basic knowledge of practical electronics and electricity should still be solid; my basic knowledge of practical hydraulics should still be solid but would certainly need updating in more advanced areas; my technical expertise with regards to PLCs and such will certainly need updating; I am now quite competent at mathematics - mathematical logic in particular, see, for instance:Wes Hansen's answer to What can be said about the concept of number, which has not been said before?Wes Hansen's answer to Can Godel's incompleteness theorem also apply to an unsolved conjecture that is totally irrelevant to the self-referential liar paradox?If you would like to engage with me on a professional level with regards to my technologies, then that would require a non-disclosure agreement; other than that, I would just like to see some justice and perhaps gainful employment! For 10 years now I’ve been living in the dumpsters and, quite frankly, I’m sick of it! But it’s really the injustice which gets to me . . .Here’s an edit; it is a comment I have left on Matthew F. Ware's answer to Are some of Mueller's staff about to reveal where Barr has hidden the real story?which I think is relevant to the situation:Yeah, it’s kinda like “asset forfeiture” isn’t it? I was living in a shack in the woods by Bush Intercontinental in Houston, Texas, (see my comment to Brian Cananzey above) back when the whole hooplah about forfeiture came to the fore. The congressman who introduced legislature putting limits on asset forfeiture did so because some little town in East Texas, situated on some main highway in between, I believe, Houston and Shreverport, Louisiana, was financing their whole operation off of a speed trap. The problem was, when a white person got caught in their trap, they would give out a warning or a ticket and an admonishment to “slow down now,” and send them on their way; however, when a black person got caught, they would confiscate the vehicle, all loose cash, all jewelry, and anything else of value - I’m surprised they didn’t take kidneys and livers. Their “logic” was, “Well, they’re black and traveling to Shreveport from Houston so they must be a dope dealer.”Your problem is, you’ve never been caught up in this bullshit; I have! There is no “logic” to the so-called criminal justice system, the entire bedrock is based on your logical fallacy (anecdotal); what do you think legal precedent actually is!?! In spite of the constitution, our set of axioms, the law isn’t some theory deduced from that set - especially on the freaking liberal side! Okay, so let’s talk a bit about obstruction!Here’s my story: Wes Hansen's answer to How would a homeless person spend $100?. No, I’m not online panhandling, just read it!I’ve been eating shit sandwiches for the last 20 years because of Bob Mueller and James Comey - among others. Everything that I describe in that email to Spence happened in a conservative county, Harris, in a conservative state, Texas, under a conservative administration, George Bush. I contacted the ACLU in Houston in 2007; I had an email account with AT&T at the time and contacted some Jewish lady - an attorney. I received one response and never again received a response to my emails. I contacted the Houston Chronicle and Leonard Pitts at the Miami Herald; here’s my email exchange with Pitts:“ MLK5 messagesWes HansenMon, Feb 3, 2014 at 10:17 AMTo: [email protected]. Pitts,I read your column regularly via the Houston Chronicle and have long admired it; you have an eloquent way with words and seem particularly adept at exposing the emperor’s nakedness. On many occasions I have contemplated writing a quick note of respect but have always held back, for whatever reason.Recently I read your column, “On the issue of race in America, conservatives are silent,” and found it rather poignant. With regards to the Martin Luther King, Jr. quote, “We who engage in nonviolent direct action . . . ,” it would seem to me that journalists, especially popular journalists such as yourself, are the ideal agents of nonviolent direct action; “the pen is mightier than the sword.” As such I can’t help but wonder . . .I’m a former U. S. Marine who signed a guaranteed 0300 contract just prior to the first Gulf War; I was young and looking for adventure. In the same issue of the Chronicle that your above referenced column appeared there was a story titled, “Hero: Was sacrifice in Fallujah worth it?” (http://www.houstonchronicle.com/news/houston-texas/houston/article/Fallujah-veteran-questions-sacrifice-5175608.php). The hero in question, Marty Gonzalez, was a 24 year-old Marine sergeant who received three Purple Hearts and two Bronze Stars in the battle for Fallujah. He had nine surgeries to repair a shattered elbow, received a brain injury from a grenade, injured his back, an injury which was exacerbated by subsequent surgeries to the point he requires a wheelchair, and he suffers from PTSD. During the battle for Fallujah, 18 young men from his battalion paid the ultimate.Mr. Gonzalez is upset about the recent situation in Fallujah to the point he became physically ill. This is understandable and I certainly empathize; however, Mr. Gonzalez expresses anger at President Obama for the President’s decision to withdraw from Iraq in the manner in which he did and I feel this anger is grossly misdirected! And of course the Chronicle, being who they are, magnified this expression of anger, or so I feel.If you read the recent book by Stephen Kinzer, “The Brothers” (http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/10/books/review/the-brothers-by-tephen-kinzer.html?_r=0), it becomes readily apparent that the Dulles brothers conspired with Johnson and, most probably, the Brown brothers, to murder John F. Kennedy. The result of this assassination, hence, their motive, is a matter of historical record: the ascendancy of Johnson to the Presidency; the escalation of the Vietnam conflict based on false premise; the enrichment of Texas and Kill, Burn, and Loot (KBR) from the blood and tax money collected from all other 49 states and re-directed, through Vietnam, to Texas!Fast forward a number of years and you have Darth Vader’s clone, Dick Cheney, as CEO of Halliburton, owner of Kill, Burn, and Loot. A Texan, George Dumbya Bush, becomes President taking Cheney along. In spite of having the most advanced intelligence apparatus in the world, an intelligence apparatus clearly focused on Al Queda, America’s leadership (executive branch and congress) unbelievably (emphasis on unbelievably) fails to comprehend the intent of a dozen Saudi Arabians resulting in 9/11. Capitalizing on the anger generated by 9/11, Cheney and company, under false pretense, a pretense negated by said intelligence apparatus (although I question the motive of said negation), organize the invasion of Iraq. Once again, Texas and Kill, Burn, and Loot get filthy rich (emphasis on filthy) off the blood and tax money from all the other states, this time filtered through Iraq!Human beings evolved to recognize patterns and I question that I’m the only one in existence who sees this pattern. Why does no-one in the popular news media have the courage to point it out? These are the same people responsible for many of the lies and much of the injustice which you rail against Mr. Pitts; perhaps you can find the courage. Feel free to mention my name and link to my blog:(On my blog was a redacted copy of the Credence document referenced in my Quora answer above, which I linked to)“Our lives begin to end,” said King, “the day we become silent about things that matter.”Best regards,Wes HansenPitts, Leonard <[email protected]>Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 10:18 AMTo: [email protected] received your email. Thank you for writing. I or my assistant will try to get back to you as soon as possible.Please note that we do not open unsolicited attachments, and we do not read or respond to forwarded emails sent to mass-distribution lists, or to invitations sent via Twitter or LinkedIn.Yours Truly,Leonard Pitts, Jr.Author of "Freeman," "Before I Forget" and "Forward From This Moment"Pitts, Leonard <[email protected]>Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 10:51 AMTo: Wes Hansen <[email protected]>Thanks for taking the time to write, and for your kind words about Mr. Pitts' column. I'll make sure he sees your email.Sincerely --Judi SmithAssistant to Leonard Pitts, Jr.Yeah, okay, so shortly after that (I was homeless in the woods at the time) some hacker working for the Washington Post hacks into my G+ account and leaves a message IN MY BLOG - not in the comments. He tells me he is a hacker working for WP and that someone had already hacked my G+ making it impossible to comment so the reporter he worked for had him hack in and he told me I should read some book - I don’t recall the book and had no way to read said book at that time.Roughly around this same time, I sent a return receipt requested letter to the Texas Innocence Project and it was returned to me unaccepted - I had erected a “mail-box” beside the road passing by my woods. I sent that rejected letter along with a letter of explanation to the National Innocence Project and received a form letter telling me that they didn’t handle cases like mine and that I needed to contact the Texas branch. Thinking that perhaps they had squared things with the Texas branch, I sent a second return receipt requested letter to the Texas branch and it was once again returned unaccepted. The property I was living on was sold and they began tearing out the woods in preparation for development; I road an old bicycle to San Antonio, caught the UP train to El Paso, and took Greyhound to Los Angeles.Upon arrival in L. A. I contacted Sandy Banks and Steve Lopez at the L. A. Times; two weeks later, Sandy Banks, a black woman, took early retirement; here is a copy of that email:“Homeless VeteranWesley HansenWed 7/8/2015 4:06 PMTo: [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>1 attachments (2 MB)Credence.pdf;Ms. Banks and Mr. Lopez,I’m a homeless veteran living under a bridge crossing the Los Angeles River and I’ve been reading your columns on homelessness recently. I was honorably discharged from the United States Marine Corps in 1994, have 57 credit hours of Community College with a 3.89 GPA, and have been homeless since March of 2009. From 2009 until September of 2014 I lived in the woods near Bush Intercontinental Airport in Houston, Texas, and have been here in Los Angeles since last September.The city of Houston has approached homelessness in much the same way that Los Angeles is doing now. The first thing they did was remove all of the water spigots from the public parks; then, they placed stainless steel locking mechanisms on all of the fire hydrants; concurrently, they passed a city ordinance making it illegal to solicit on city streets and roadways and making it illegal for organizations to feed the homeless anywhere within city limits. And compared to Los Angeles housing in Houston is highly affordable if not cheap.Here’s the thing about politicians and business owners here in America: they like to think they can have their cake and eat it too, a logical absurdity. I survive by sifting through other people’s trash and I occasionally find newspapers, magazines, and even books that I like to read. At one point during this last recession, I came across a Wall Street Journal, Special Edition, which was celebrating the positive effect trust-fund children were having on the upscale housing market; this at a time when the general housing market was in the tank. They featured several stories about trust fund babies including a story about two young girls, one 19 years the other 21, whose father had given them each a $90 million trust fund. Each of these girls owned homes, each priced in the tens of millions, in different cities around the world, New York, Los Angeles, London, Paris, etc. The youngest girl, her husband, and their four dogs spent part of the year living in the 60,000 square foot “Spelling” mansion here in Los Angeles; this is the size of a Mid-Western shopping mall and their master suite is over 4,000 square feet, larger than most duplexes housing two families of the working poor. This was being celebrated by the Wall Street Journal; it was presented as something to be envious of.A year or so after reading the Special Edition of the Journal, I found a Houston Chronicle carrying a full page story, with a lead in on the front page, of Martha Turner’s sale of an equity stake in her company, Turner Properties, to Sotheby’s International. The Houston Chronicle was celebrating the idea that the arrival of Sotheby’s International elevated them to the same lofty echelon as San Francisco, Los Angeles, New York, Miami, London, and Paris. In that very same issue of the Chronicle, in the City and State section, was an article about the city-wide ordinance prohibiting solicitation on roadways becoming county-wide. Apparently, the city ordinance forced the panhandlers out to the suburbs and now the leaders, in their infinite wisdom, thought they’d use the same tactic to chase them clean out of the county; after all, you can’t have homeless people in the same proximity as Sotheby’s International. Never mind the fact that you could house all of the homeless in Harris County, Texas, in two or three of the average sized, “single family” homes listed by Sotheby’s.So now I’m here in Los Angeles and I find the most wonderful Special Edition of Forbes magazine. It features the “alpha activist,” Bill Ackman on the front cover and features a story about Ackman’s Howard Hughes Corporation. Allow me an extended quote:[. . .] “But despite his rococo extravagances, Howard Hughes was a master businessman, particularly skilled in the art of avoiding taxes. In his memoir, Hughes’ accountant Noah Dietrich claims Hughes paid only about $20,000 in income taxes a year. Indeed Howard Hughes Corp.’s circuitous journey into Bill Ackman’s portfolio began as a tax scheme. In the 1930s the IRS levied a 37.5% penalty tax on unnecessary accumulated surpluses. Hughes operations never paid dividends, so Dietrich began plowing profits into undeveloped land. That’s how subsidiary Hughes Aircraft came to own the 25,000 acres of land adjacent to the Las Vegas Strip, now called Summerlin in honor of Hughes’ grandmother Jean Amelia Summerlin.In 1972 Hughes put his Vegas real estate into Summa Corp., which finally began developing Summerlin in the 1990s. Summa sold to mall developer Rouse in 1996, and in 2004 General Growth bought Rouse for $12.6 billion. During General Growth’s bankruptcy, Ackman carved out a trove of unwanted assets plus the Howard Hughes name.Fittingly, Howard Hughes Corp. still retains about $250 million in crises-related tax-loss carryforwards today, so it currently pays no taxes. Eventually Ackman may turn Howard Hughes into a REIT, dodging still more taxes. Hughes himself couldn’t have done better.” [. . .]- Forbes Magazine, the 2015 Global 2000 Issue, pg. 89Now, if Steve Forbes were to read this email, he would probably say I was just some liberal, communist agitator who doesn’t understand the benefits of capitalist principles; he would probably throw a couple of Ludwig Von Mises quotes at me as a counter-argument; and he would probably try to put me out of mind as quickly as conveniently possible. But I am not a communist agitator and I do understand the apparent benefits of a “self-organizing” economic system. All I am stating, to the politicians and business leaders, is this: you can’t celebrate these extravagant excesses, which our society does on a daily basis, without also celebrating the fact that there are multitudes of homeless people roaming OUR cities, sleeping in tents on OUR sidewalks, shitting in OUR gutters, panhandling along OUR roadways, and sifting recyclables out of OUR trash receptacles; you can’t have your cake and eat it too, it’s a logical absurdity.As for me, all I need to get off the street is for the F.B.I., the Office of the U.S. Inspector General, or some branch of law enforcement to simply do their job. I have attached a 20 page document, with lots of pictures, called, “Credence: A Tale of Corruption,” which summarizes my story. Every level of law enforcement, city, county, state, and federal, knows my story and they have consistently done absolutely nothing.With regards,Wes Hansen”Here’s a copy of the email I sent to Anthony Kelley, a former Marine who works with the L. A. County Sheriff’s department and who was put in my life by the social worker at the VA clinic on Temple St.:“HelloFromWesHansen/SemperFi4 messagesWes HansenSat, Sep 24, 2016 at 4:21 PMTo: [email protected]. Kelley,I spoke to you and your associate today, on 7th and, I believe, Flower, downtown - about the Valor program. Please find attached a brief document, "Credence: A Tale of Corruption," which provides an introduction to the circumstances which led to my current situation. I am also a fairly competent fine artist and you can see some examples of my work (oil paintings and drawings) on my blog:http://atomicdecompositions.blogspot.com/As I mentioned to you and your associate, I have been studying mathematics since becoming homeless in March of 2009 and I have made a small number of novel contributions, four to the applied side and one, the Non-standard Peano Arithmetic which I was telling you about, to the pure side:https://johncarlosbaez.wordpress.com/2016/04/02/computing-the-uncomputable/"Ever since reading this blog post (some time ago now) I’ve been thinking about these non-standard models of PA and I don’t particularly care for any of them!?! I’m not a formally trained mathematician but I’ve been thinking about this a great deal and it seems to me that the non-standard models are not the most effective approach. So here’s a question posed as an idea that I’ve had.Consider the natural numbers defined as sets in ZFC by von Neumann. Since ZFC/AFA subsumes ZFC, could you not define the natural numbers as sets in ZFC/AFA, define an additional 1-place, non-logical symbol, @, call it the hyperloop, which, when applied to any set, generates that set’s hyperset. Would it not then be reasonable to suggest that the natural number @{null} is greater than one but less than two and could you not apply @ recursively generating an order-preserving non-standard model of the von Neumann naturals that also had the power of the continuum? And then could you not develop PA the standard way but with this set of non-standard von Neumann naturals as the universe? Would that not preserve sequentiality, hence, be a bit more practical and effective as opposed to these other non-standard models? To me it just seems to make a whole lot more sense and, of course, my motivation, as always, is that damn Goldbach conjecture . . .Anyway, back to the grind . . ."This was comment number 91, the very last comment on that post. Now, don't think that since there was no response that my idea is not valid; quite the contrary, if you read the comment I replied to I think it will indicate to you not only the validity of my idea but that it is a rather good idea! Of course, if you doubt my comprehension of mathematics I would not be offended. I have been exposed to a large number of mentally compromised individuals during the last fifteen years so I well know how subtle the symptoms can sometimes be. Anyone with a knowledge of mathematical logic and elementary number theory can tell you that the above idea and the proof of the Binary Goldbach Conjecture on my blog, which I authored sometime in 2010-2011, demonstrate at least a working familiarity with the subject matter.Now Harris County, Texas, did send to me to the North Texas State Forensic Psychiatric Hospital in Vernon, Texas, for a competency evaluation when I was in their custody, but there was not then nor has there been anytime since, any doubt as to my mental competence; the court, and I believe the attached document should at the very least make you consider the truth value of this, simply wanted to be able to tell a jury that I was incompetent. You know, I first contacted the FBI with this situation, with a written letter from jail, in 2005. I scheduled an appointment with the FBI office in Beaumont, Texas, and met with an agent for a very short time in late 2007 or early 2008. Finally, I then sent the entire story organized in three-ring binders with table of contents and tabs, including all legal documents (Non-disclosure agreements, court papers, etc.) to the Office of the U. S. Inspector General, the Assistant U. S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Texas (I spoke with a gentleman from that office for a short time on the phone), an office at ABC Investigative News with Brian somebody (I forget the last name), and a childhood friend in Nebraska, Harris Grunden (Harris and I are no longer friendly).I don't know if you can do anything about this situation or not; I certainly have contacted a number of people to no avail. Generally, the people I contact about this do not even acknowledge that contact, for whatever reason. I have, in my possession, design documents regarding the inventions outlined in the Credence document, should you need proof of those claims.With regards,Wes HansenCredence.pdf2072K”Here’s a follow up email after I figured out that he was lying to me - hey Semper Fi:“Go Fuck Yourself2 messagesWes HansenThu, Dec 15, 2016 at 12:30 PMTo: AKelly <[email protected]>Yeah, I went down Figueroa today and found out there is no VA facility on Figueroa; came back to the library and found out the VALOR program is for Pharmacy students.http://www.wsj.com/articles/the-perils-of-empathy-1480689513You remind me of my family; they're all rotten as fuck as well.”Here’s a copy of the email I sent to Bernie Sanders’ PAC back in 2015 prior to the primaries. My biggest fear was seeing Clinton and Cruz in the general so I registered democrat (in California) so I could vote in the primary and voted for Sanders (I’m a Libertarian) - he has absolutely no integrity and is part of the conspiracy against Donald Trump. Read my Quora answer before you judge the email; the problem with these emails is, they have a word limit. In the case below, I attached a 20 page summary which outlines the criminal activity quite well. It also includes proprietary drawings of my inventions related to the Ares Robotics gig - I was an independent contractor, hence, Ares had no legal right to these inventions. The email:“Homeless Veteran2 messagesWes HansenWed, Nov 11, 2015 at 11:17 AMTo: [email protected]. Sanders,I submitted the following to Senator Sanders via the comment form on his government website:I am a homeless veteran who has been homeless since March of 2009. Please find attached a 20 page document, with lot’s of pictures, called, “Credence: A Tale of Corruption.” It is a brief summary of the events leading up to and resulting in my current situation. In summary:In 94’ I was honorably discharged from the U. S. Marine Corps; in 95’ I was an honor graduate, class D252, at The Ocean Corporation, a commercial dive school in Houston, Texas; after an illusion bursting stint with American Oilfield Divers, I took a manufacturing job and started night school full-time at Houston Community College; studying pre-science with the intent to transfer, in a couple of years I accumulated 57 credit hours with a 3.89 GPA; working as an independent contractor, albeit exclusively for a robotics firm, Ares Robotics (the deal was, being a recent start-up and short on cash, Ares Robotics would hire me as an independent contractor, pay my tax bill, and when the business became solid the board would assess my contribution, sweat equity they called it, and extend me ownership based on that assessment), I invented a number of novel technologies, technologies which should have made me independently wealthy; almost immediately I acquired two felonies and three misdemeanors on a previously spotless criminal record and found myself incarcerated at the maximum security forensic psychiatric hospital in Vernon, Texas; I notified the Houston office of the F. B. I. of these events in 2005 with a letter sent from the Harris County Jail; the situation deteriorated; I scheduled a meeting with the F. B. I. in Beaumont, Texas, in 2007 while on parole and experiencing “difficulties” with securing gainful employment in 2007; the situation continued to deteriorate; in January of 2009 I wrote a detailed account of my experience supported by copies of all legal documents, professionally organized with Table of Contents and Tabs, and sent copies to the U. S. Office of the Inspector General and Assistant U. S. Attorney, Eastern District of Texas; in March of 2009 I became homeless, a situation which continues to this day; a little over a year ago I moved to Los Angeles, California; my extended family, as well as many of the people from the community in Nebraska where I grew up, Nebraska’s official Easter City, are intimately involved in the theft of my technologies; during my time as a homeless man I have studied mathematics, practiced yoga, and further developed my meditation practice; I now know considerably more about mathematics than I did in 2009; I am a Buddhist so I assume the long view . . .I am convinced the Federal Bureau of Investigation has been involved in this despicable conspiracy since day one! I served my country with honor and don't feel out of line for expecting my country to serve me honorably; to date, this has not been so . . .With regards,Wes HansenCredence.pdf2072K”Here’s a copy of the Whistleblower notice I sent to Chuck Grassley’s office; at that same time I also sent emails to the Congressional Offices of Grassley, Sue Collins, Rand Paul, Lindsey Graham, and Devin Nunes - all along the same lines:“Mueller investigation/pertinent info2 messagesWes HansenSun, Aug 26, 2018 at 3:16 PMTo: [email protected],This email is in regards to the on-going Bob Mueller investigation; I have pertinent information about said situation. Both Jeff Sessions and Rudy Guiliani, hence, the President, are aware of this situation; this situation is why the President is upset with Jeff Sessions.I’m a homeless Marine Corps veteran (0352, 1991 – 1994) living under a bridge on the east side of the LA River and I’m homeless BECAUSE of Bob Mueller and James Comey! I know first-hand how they really operate!I was honorably discharged from the USMC in 1994, graduated from The Ocean Corporation, a commercial dive school in 1995, and, after a short disillusioned stint in the off-shore industry, started work in a small job shop during the day and going to school full-time in the evening at the Houston Community College. I was making $60,000/year and maintaining a 3.9 GPA at the college - things were going well. Then I invented some novel technologies relevant to the oil and gas industry and a couple of wealthy individuals decided they wanted to steal the IP. I went from having zero criminal history and zero mental health history to having 3 misdemeanors and 2 felonies AND a full-blown mental history in a very short time.I took the second felony case to trial, hence, the trip to the North Texas State Hospital; they wanted to tell the jury I was mentally incompetent. I filed an appeal and it was run through the system without my notification - something which is illegal, even in Texas. After I was released on parole, I had an FBI agent follow me around everywhere I went, eventually resulting in joblessness and homelessness. The story is long but here’s a relevant excerpt (I sent this to a mathematician at the University of Lethbridge in Canada recently; I made a couple of significant contributions to pure mathematics, with implications for cyber security, hence, national security, and he and his wife were both very helpful: http://vixra.org/author/wes_hansen):“I really do live on the streets of Los Angeles (for four years now, the previous six on the streets of Houston, Texas) and that's really why I do the weird stuff I do; it would most likely be impossible to explain to someone who has never experienced the street.I have been homeless for the last decade; I don't mind living hard like I do, but I'm sick and tired of living in the trash receptacles - where I get my $25/week for groceries. I was put on the streets by my family working in conjunction with the USA's FBI, although in truth, the FBI was setting my family up. I was doing well, honorably discharged from the USMC, working full-time during the day making $60,000/year, and going to the community college full-time in the evening, studying Pre-science/Pre-engineering with intent to transfer and maintaining a 3.9 GPA (out of 4.0). Then I invented some novel technologies relevant to the Oil/Gas/PetroChemical industries and a host of rather wealthy/powerful individuals decided they wanted my stuff. It's a long story but here's a couple of relevant excerpts:[M]y parents, Harley and Kathy Hansen, leased considerable properties from a lady named Bertha Hengler for more than twenty years. Bertha lived in Casper, Wyoming, and both her son, Jim, and daughter-in-law, Alice, retired from executive positions at Casper refineries. We used to visit Bertha, Jim, and Alice at least once a year to go snow skiing. Jim and Alice were cross-country enthusiasts. My parents, upon Bertha’s death, purchased half of the Hengler property they had rented from Jim and Alice and continued to rent the other half from Bertha’s son, Bob. While working at Ares Robotics I tried to get my parents to leverage these connections but they would have none of it. I sent Ares Robotics marketing packages to both my parents and my godmother, Zella Mae Sanders, and received no response from either party.[I] filed a lawsuit in a Texas court requesting the return of confidential documents as provided by a provision in the Confidentiality Agreement. The defendant, Mark Hansen, was a resident of Colorado so it was necessary to involve the Texas Secretary of State. I received notice from the Secretary of State, via certified mail, that Mark Hansen had been duly served on December 11, 2008. The Texas court in question never received such notice thus a trial date was never set. I filed two separate lawsuits in this same court, one on the same day as I filed the suit naming Mark Hansen as defendant, and its integrity was well established.The Secretary of State sabotaged the judicial proceedings of a Texas court in the attempt to prevent the authentication of said Confidentiality Agreement while, at the same time, convincing my family of their intent to help them (my family) steal the technologies and trade secrets covered by said Confidentiality Agreement. They failed in this endeavor for, as the old saying goes, “There’s more than one way to skin a cat.” They made this attempt in order to assist William Albion Anderson, an extremely wealthy Perry campaign contributor, in his attempted theft of technologies and proprietary information which rightfully belong to me; technologies I have since patented. I have also managed to maintain Trade Secret status, as defined by both Texas State law and the Economic Espionage Act of 1996, on the majority of the technologies in question.So why did the Texas Secretary of State foolishly interfere with the judicial proceedings of a Texas court? They planned to arrest my whole family, myself included, for “Theft of Trade Secrets.” Here’s how:I knew my family was being set up, I just didn’t know how. I knew there had to be a connection between William Albion Anderson and Rex Hansen. I started pounding the internet searching for it. On William Albion Anderson’s Forbes profile it demonstrated that he had been appointed as a Director for Rancher Energy of Denver, Colorado, in the spring of 2007 and a Director for Far East Energy of Houston, Texas, in the fall of 2007. Considering this whole conspiracy was coming into play in 2007, I found these appointments suspect. I became even more convinced of their conspiratorial nature when I discovered that Rancher Energy, a company using CO2 injection to extract oil from spent oil wells, was working solely in oil fields conveniently located in the direct vicinity of Casper, Wyoming.In the offering memorandum for Sausalito Foods Rex Hansen emailed to me, it reveals that Rex Hansen is a Managing Director for Bathgate Capital of Denver, Colorado. I began researching Bathgate Capital and discovered, in their tombstones, that Bathgate had extended $1.4 million in seed capital to a company in Houston, Texas, called Far East Energy. Bingo! The Rex Hansen/William Albion Anderson connection. The State of Texas/FBI had all of my information including social security number. They planned to demonstrate, in a Texas court, that Rex Hansen became aware of the pump and robotic system in question while engaging William Albion Anderson through the Bathgate/Far East Energy connection. They then planned to demonstrate, in a Texas court, that Rex Hansen directed me, his cousin, to work for the William Albion Anderson company manufacturing said pump and robotic system thus familiarizing myself with the technology and facilitating the theft of that technology. They were going to put my whole family in prison.This all started in 1999, when I was 30 years old - 19 years I’ve either been locked up for crimes I didn’t commit, in the Maximum Security Forensic Psychiatric Hospital for evaluation I didn’t need, working a minimum wage job, a monitor on my ankle, on parole for a crime I didn’t commit, or, as now, homeless and living out the dumpsters!This all happened in a conservative state - Texas, under a conservative President from that state - George W. Bush. When Obama won the election in 2008, I was ecstatic. I thought, “Oh, yeah, we’re going to have some fun now!” I put this whole story together in three ring binders with table of contents and tabs; it took 2 three inch binders, two 1.5 inch binders, 3 legal folders, and 2 CDs - everything was documented, Non-disclosure agreements, Court docs, memos from meetings with FBI personnel, emails, photographs, everything. I had six copies; I boxed up five of them and sent them to the U. S. Office of Inspector General, the U. S. Assistant Attorney, Eastern District of Texas, Brian Ross at ABC News, a friend I grew up with, and a former girlfriend who was a lawyer at the time - now a District Court Judge. Everyone screwed me over except the ex-girlfriend! She kept my documents for me! Shortly after mailing everything, I received a call from someone at the U. S. Assistant Attorney’s office - I now regret mailing them the documentation. The FBI put me out on the street specifically to make me lose my documentation - I’m certain of it, but the Judge saved my day.Now you tell me, do you really think Comey and Mueller are capable of an impartial investigation? And the whole tale is way worse than what I have revealed here. I’d like to see Barack Obama, Eric Holder, Loretta Lynch, Comey, Mueller, McCabe, Rosenstein, and that whole rotten bunch locked up where they belong. And don’t think for a minute ole Barry Boy doesn’t know about my situation, because he damn sure does - so does Bernie “can’t be bought by billionaires” Sanders. So does the Washington (Democracy dies in darkness) Post, the Houston Chronicle, the L A Times, Leonard Pitts at the Miami Herald, and, more recently, the Wall Street Journal.Jeff Sessions, I believe, has gone over to the Dark Side. He says that under his charge the DOJ will not be used for political ends but what is Mueller’s investigation? It was started with the Steele dossier for goodness sakes, and I tend to believe the entire circus was deliberate on the part of Comey, Mueller, and the rest of Obama’s DOJ and administration. Let’s be serious, liberals like to think that Donald Trump “stole the election” from Hillary Clinton, but Clinton lost that election with her “basket of deplorables” comment; in other words, she lost that election due to her own misplaced sense of superiority. Did Trump cut a deal with Putin, exchanging dirt on Clinton for a revisit of Magnitsky? That doesn’t even make sense given that the President is essentially powerless with regards to Magnitsky!With regards,Wesley W. Hansen”And it goes on and on!And now we have Bob Barr, a good friend of Bob Mueller, telling the American People that there is no systemic problem at the FBI only a small leadership issue; obviously Bob could give a fuck about me; obviously the American People could give a fuck about me. Now talk to me about obstruction!