Cert 134: Fill & Download for Free

I like to use 134-L but it might be hard to find right now. If you are in the states RCS has a modified MDI Modified MDI Isocyanate Curative 1 Gallon that seems to be pretty good and you dont have to buy it from some guy in an alley. There are some others selling other curatives that will work just as well.I would recommend finding a mentor that has done this before. Join Tripoli rockety association TRA,www.tripoli.org/ and get your level 2 cert. You wont have an ejection charge on these so learning to fly with electronics is a plus. I would recommend starting with a 3 grain 38mm. This will let you learn the basics and not waste a tone of chems and you wont have that much invested if you Cato.The rocketry forum has a pretty good EX section. The Rocketry Forum

Yes, because under the federal justice system marks it as a class 1 narcotic. You have aposession charge thus by law you have a drug problem.Federal law also says that any person "who is an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance" is barred from possessing guns. 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3). What does that mean? Good question. "[T]he exact reach of the statute is not easy to define," to say the least! United States v. Jackson, 280 F.3d 403, 406 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 911 (2002).The consensus seems to be that the statute does not apply to "infrequent" drug users or to those who used drugs in the "distant past." Instead, it is aimed at those whose drug use is "sufficiently consistent, 'prolonged,' and close in time to [their] gun possession to put [them] on notice that [they] qualified as an unlawful user of drugs under the statute." United States v. Edwards, 38 Fed. Appx. 134, 138 (4th Cir. 2002), cert. denied, --- U.S. ---, 123 S.Ct. 1764 (2003).The bottom line is that if you have someone with a drug problem, you should tell them to get rid of their guns. If it is a close call, tell them about the law and let them decide if they want to take the risk of owning a gun. So you risk falling under a federal gun ban by owning firearms. A future drug arrest with a firearm looks even worse, like drug dealing and because the laws are as they are May end up with a felony firearms conviction because you have a gun with an illegal substance.DONT BE A DOPE, get clean and enjoy a life of freedom.

Could the order be served by publication if it is not served by personal process? I would argue the failure to provide a current address is unlawful avoidance of service of process. If you knew the new address and simply failed to serve, that could be a problem; but a new order could be issued to start the clock for service again. If you did not know and made every reasonable effort to find the new address, that ought to be in your favor at a hearing.A similar rule applies in federal court where an order that is known binds all who know of it. Reich v. United States, 239 F.2d 134 (1st Cor. 1956) cert. denied 352 U.S. 1004 (1956) (a federal court order binds all who know of it nationwide, even if not a party to the original case issuing the order).There are at least 2 ways to argue this in your state court if needed. since this is federal law binding in all states because the Supreme Court approved the result without addressing the reasoning, Article 6 Clause 2 makes this the supreme law of the land and binding on all state judges to follow. In the alternative your lawyer can research the headnotes of the case to see if any rulings from the state court follow the same principle.