Sworn Personal History Statement Form: Fill & Download for Free

If it’s a security clearance, you most likely have no say in the matter.If you know someone is going to tell scurrilous lies about you, you’ll just have to be prepared to deal with that after the security check is conducted.

Well, it turns out that if a judge seals your records, then you will be able to deny committing those youthful indiscretions if you were applying for a civilian job.The Federal Government and the Military are a whole different story. You have to tell them. Depending on what you did, the Recruiter might be able to get it waived. You have to remember that the Recruiter is working for you, since every new recruit is a feather in his cap.Before you get sworn in, you are taken to military entrance and processing station where you get a physical, have to fill out a bunch of forms, including a statement of personal history, and sit and take some written exams.Then, right before you take the oath, they read you the “Riot Act,” telling you what all is going to happen to you if you lied about anything up to now. You have to come clean or face federal charges for fraudulent enlistment. It usually works. Some guys are like, my faded memory is coming back to me.

This answer may contain sensitive images. Click on an image to unblur it.I used to believe that no such thing as a question that deserves a rant. But this one does.There is no such thing as a "righteous kill", let alone one involving Gandhi. Even Godse will not agree with this question - the Godse brothers were fans of Gandhi before they decided that Gandhi was favoring Muslims and decided to kill him. Godse did so because in his own way, he decided that doing so would cause the Hindu Mahasabha and RSS to gain traction. But it ended up doing just the opposite.Gandhi is a man, not a saint. And like all people, he has his fair share of flaws. Gandhi is the most famous leader of all time and for various reasons, people have come to prepare list of things he had done wrong. All that is trumped by his biggest and I would say only achievement - He is responsible for India as we know it today. Without Gandhi, India would have fallen apart after being granted freedom.Update:I have nothing against personal opinions justifying Godse, as some of them are true, I acknowledged before that Gandhi had his flaws. But history is being misquoted in answers, and I would like to clarify certain things:1.The statement about a Supreme Court Judge saying Godse would have been acquitted has no factual basis. Besides the obvious sworn oath Judges take not to give personal opinions and violating that would get them disbarred, Godse was tried at Punjab High Court. Supreme Court was not even formed when Godse was alive. It had its first sitting on Jan 28,1950 after Constitution of India was written and Godse was hanged several months (Nov '49) before the first Supreme Court Judge was sworn in (Jan '50).2. Gandhi recommended that funds be given because that was a part of the Indian Independence act. Initially the share was 17.5 Pakistan to 82.5 India, but it was adjusted to 20-80 finally. Believe it or not, this included everything from books in libraries to railway bogies and broomsticks owned by the government at the time. It was complied with down to ink bottles that the Government owned at the time. Please note that this debt (75 crore) included the cost of Wine cellars (Pakistan, being a Muslim country alcohol was Haraam there). Gandhi had no role in the Act, it was negotiated by Nehru, Jinnah and Mountbattem who was the plenipotentiary. The pre-partition debt of India was 75 crore, which we were to pay up in three installments. If we had not paid it, it would have added to our liabilities. After paying the first installment of 20 crores (not 62 crores as quoted here), war broke out (war of Kashmir '47) and we did not pay the remaining 55 crore. 20 crore is peanuts for India and, 0.00594 percent of the $33750 Million GDP in 1950. Statements saying it could have helped immigrants are not factual. Pakistan's pre-partition debt is 475 crore technically, and 300Crore as per our annual budget. If you take a look at our budget during filing by Minister of Finance, there will be a section titled "amount due from Pakistan on account of share of pre-partition debt." with 300Cr rupees every year. Interesting to note that GoI has not added interest every year for Pakistan. The original act, Section 14, sub section 2 says:3. The Chauri Chaura incident is seen as a small in magnitude. Gandhi called off the non-cooperation movement because it had the ability to go pan-India causing many deaths. While the Indian struggle for independence was hardly bloodless, without Gandhi, the implications are much worse - balkanisation, mutiny and a war of independence. We bypassed all that by sacrificing a decade or two in terms of when we got independence.4. Sardar was old and volunteered to get his hands dirty as the Home Minister. He believed that his task was unifying the country and he became known as "Iron hand in velvet glove". Nehru headed the Planning commission in '39 when Bose was President of Congress, and there was no one else with the diplomatic or negotiation skills. Think about it - Sardar and Nehru took on roles which they were best suited for. Bose was ousted when he wanted to go against the very foundation Congress was built on - work for a peaceful resolution. Bose then formed the Forward Block, was arrested and put under house arrest. That would have happened anyway if Gandhi had not ousted him.5. Gandhi's own sons were never against him - in fact Gandhi did not involve any of his relatives in politics and avoided nepotism at all costs which is the trend nowadays. When Godse was sentenced, Gandhi's sons came out publicly against hanging Godse, as per Gandhian principles. The other person who was against capital punishment was Nehru.6. The Khilafat movement was not supported by Jinnah, who founded Pakistan. To say that the Khilafat movement is directly responsible for Pakistan is a wrong conclusion.7. I would finally like to point out one more thing - during mass riots and genocide during the Noakhali genocide, which most people convinently leave out of history books, the only national leader who went to save the Hindu women and restore peace was Gandhi. The other leaders (Congress, Muslim league, RSS, Hindu Mahasabha) surveyed the area with military escort and went back, where as Gandhi went into the riot prone region without security of any kind and lived there for a few weeks. He received death threats and another attempt was made on his life. That did not deter him. His methods were ineffective, but compared to other to other leaders who left the region in chaos for the problem to sort itself out, he did what he could - he was a 76 year old man, walked barefoot to the place and calmed down the situation in a few days. Could anyone point out any other leader in the world who takes security risks, goes into a region which hates him, to save another group of people who hated him as well? That is the cost of doing the right thing. Note that Gandhi risked his life for Hindus in Bengal. I bet this story is left out huh?History can be portrayed in many ways based on how you look at it. Gandhi, despite his many flaws did what nobody else had a clue about - Moral acts of aggression instead of physical acts of aggression.