Urine Initial Drug Screen Result: Fill & Download for Free

I have been answering questions on drug screening at many online forums for years and now here on Quora for a month or two. And it still baffles me that people are so uninformed on this growing subject. The biggest myth that I see everywhere is that water, if drank in copious amounts, will somehow “wash” or “flush” THC from your system. This is absolutely untrue. When I’m helping someone that has time to detox (for a heavy smoker- 1 to 3 months), I always include a healthy amount of water intake, but only as part of a high cardio/low weight workout. This is only to remain hydrated, not excessive amounts to wash your system of THC. THC is stored in your fat cells, therefore water plays no role in the actual detox process.Next is the people that keep perpetuating the rumor that this detox drink or that magic pill will help you pass a drug screen. Pure urban myth. There has been a small handful of products over the years that can alter your results, Goldenseal and aspirin come to mind. But the testing industry took steps to eliminate these loopholes. Allow me to explain why some of these products, Certo, Qcarbo32, QuickClen, etc… have had some success. Each of these products or methods have one thing in common, water. The Certo method, for example, calls for you to drink 1 pouch mixed with a 32 oz bottle of Gatorade, 2 to 4 hours before your test time. Then, 6 to 8, eight oz glasses of water leading up to the test. IF someone was to pass using this method, it would be because they diluted their sample enough to bring their THC metabolites below the nanogram level of the test. The problem here is that this method will only pass the initial drug SCREEN. The immunoassay (dipstick) test. During this screening, if it looks like pee and is warm like pee, it is pee. I know people that have passed using flat Mountain Dew! As long as your tester thinks its pee, the little temp strip on the side of the cup reads within the proper range and the dipstick comes back negative, it will never see the inside of the lab. If he is suspicious, he will send it to a lab as a presumptive positive. There he will ask for confirmation and your diluted sample will get you busted. In the end, the only thing any detox drink or magic pill will clean out is YOUR WALLET.Before I bore everyone to sleep, let me answer the question. There are only 3 was to pass a drug TEST. I’m talking about the ones sent to an actual lab. The first is a no-brainer, abstinence. The difficult part, if your smoking habits include longevity, heavy chronic smoking or high THC content, is knowing when you will be able to test clean. Luckily there are home testing kits to help out. But if you're on a timetable that does not allow enough time to get clean, there is a way to decrease your clean date. Strict adherence to a low fat/high fiber diet and a high cardio/low weight workout routine. I have helped people knock 2 to 3 weeks off an expected clean date (this is my own personal estimate, as no one can give you an exact time and date) with this detox program.The second is dilution. Yes, dilution is still a viable option. But I’m NOT talking about the kind you’ve heard about where you drink massive amounts of water hours before the test and pee water into the cup. I’m talking about real dilution. The kind where you DO hand in a watered down sample, but it has the correct amounts of vitamins, nutrients and minerals to test exactly like your real pee. Or at least close enough to fool any lab. Doesn’t that sound good? Probably sounds easy too, right? Just add a few spoons of this and that from GNC and POOF…dilution. NOT. A good friend of mine that helps stoners pass UAs on a forum at Grasscity wrote a post named, “The Dilution Solution” If your interested in the proper way to pull this off, look it up at Grasscity.com. But for now, let’s move on to…The third and most reliable way to CHEAT a drug test is substitution. For those of you new to this whole “drugtestcheatingthingy”, that is the act of handing in someone else’s/synthetic urine in place of your own. For employment testing, this is the most widely used and easiest way to beat a drug test. You simply get clean urine from a friend or buy synthetic at your local head shop or online (I suggest synthetic as it is easier to work with and safer). BTW, unlike what you may have heard, synthetic urine cannot be detected by a lab. I could tell you why, but I’ve made this too long already. LOL. Once you have your urine, you have two more hurdles to get over. What to carry it in and how to keep it warm. PLEASE take my advice and do not attempt to sneak it in by filling a condom with pee and taping it somewhere warm! 1 out of a hundred will get away with this. The other 99 wind up with wet pants and a funny story to tell everyone at the unemployment office. Likewise, using a small bottle wrapped in handwarmers or tucked in your gooch has a success rate of around 50%. Too unreliable for me to recommend.Bottomline, if you want to cheat your drug screen or test, buy a device that is made for doing just that. Most of you have heard about the outdated Whizzinator, urine bag tied around your waist, heated by hand warmers with hoses that run down to a fake penis. Decent product for unobserved/employment testing. The weak link is the hand warmers. Since it was introduced in the 80’s, 10 or 20 knock-offs have followed. All having the same body temperature drawback. But recently there have been a few innovative products that have hit the market. One is the Urinator. It has a battery operated heating element inside the urine bag that keeps it at body temperature for 8 hours. This is the second best product out there for unobserved/employment testing. But is useless for observed testing. As it has no fake penis, just a hose that hangs down.And now, for those of you that are still with me, I present the best way for men to beat ANY drug screen or test, HeWhizz. It has not been around long, so most of you have not heard of it. But I have recommended it many times and used it a couple of times myself. Completely hidden (even if your naked), natural looking urine stream and delivers it at exact body temperature EVERY TIME. I won’t go into details, but look it up online. It’s ingenious.Before I go, don’t think that I have forgotten the women out there. Google, “CUPID, Clean Urine Personal Insert Device” and you will have your answer too. It is the only device made exclusively for women. NOT a device made for men with the fake penis removed! With these devices, Ladies and Gentlemen, you will not have to ever worry about a drug test again! And now that I have taken up so much of your time and mine to give you the Holy Grale of beating a drug test, let me know what you think. An upvote if you find this useful or leave a comment if I have missed something or you disagree. Peace.

It shouldn’t but any screen can give false positive (5–10% of cases is considered acceptable) Drug Tests Often Trigger False PositivesFalse-Positive Interferences of Common Urine Drug Screen Immunoassays: A Review | Journal of Analytical Toxicology | Oxford Academichere is an abstract from some research suggesting screenings should be considered advisory unless confirmed with an independent test:Urine drug screen (UDS) immunoassays are a quick and inexpensive method for determining the presence of drugs of abuse. Many cross-reactivities exist with other analytes, potentially causing a false-positive result in an initial drug screen. Knowledge of these potential interferents is important in determining a course of action for patient care. We present an inclusive review of analytes causing false-positive interferences with drugs-of-abuse UDS immunoassays, which covers the literature from the year 2000 to present. English language articles were searched via the SciFinder platform with the strings ‘false positive [drug] urine’ yielding 173 articles. These articles were then carefully analyzed and condensed to 62 that included data on causes of false-positive results. The discussion is separated into six sections by drug class with a corresponding table of cross-reacting compounds for quick reference. False-positive results were described for amphetamines, opiates, benzodiazepines, cannabinoids, tricyclic antidepressants, phencyclidine, lysergic acid diethylamide and barbiturates. These false-positive results support the generally accepted practice that immunoassay positive results are considered presumptive until confirmed by a second independent chemical technique.Diagnostic Validity of the Drug Abuse Screening Test in the Assessment of DSM‐III Drug Disorders this research give 85% accuracy meaning more than one in ten is WRONG.drug testing is a con perpetuated by companies selling testing kits on the basis they give evidence, unless there is a clear evidence chain and the testing is of the highest standards drug screenings are well dodgy and should only be considered as offering a guide.Challenge all results.

In most cases the lab will only give results to their client. In the case of a pre-employment drug screen the potential employer is the client, not the potential employee.