Business Federal Forms: Fill & Download for Free

I have used and paid estimated taxes for years because of the ups and downs of my revenue flow from my business consulting enterprise, and I have Never paid a filing fee. trump may be confused, as I assume he uses his own tax attorneys to file his personal and various businesses federal, state and foreign taxes and would Not have to pay a filing fee to the IRS, but with what H & R Block and others may charge for filing for a federal tax extensions on taxes that could be the $750. that trump imagines, or it could be that with the deductions and losses trump personally has used, that according to the 1040 forms the New York Times released, trump has only paid $750. in personal federal income taxes.If trump carried loses year after year, trump would owe very little in personal federal income taxes, and would NOT have to pay “millions of dollars” in estimated taxes, just another whopping lie from trump, that some will believe.I usually do Not pay any attention to what trump says, as he has spread the truth so very very thin that the truth becomes non-existent.At tonight’s debate on 10–22–2020, trump told so many whoppers it was like spreading manure on a cowpie, while Biden held it together and only spread the truth thinly less than a dozen times.

Yeah, I remember a mundane job I had-a project really-but I liked it!H & R Block had a pack of forms hat client’s had to sign to get their returns completed.One was a federal form sequenced in a 10 digit numerical system that had to be signed and filed for auditing purposes. One season, over 400 returns had been prepared before I began my support of the office; and each of those 400 federal forms was piled in a mess of three stacks— willy nilly — needing to be organized and filed.I forget but it seems like it took about 4 hours. I enjoyed it though. I guess most people would be bored by that kind of job, but I prefer single focus stuff not multi-focus. After sequencing, I arranged hanging folders in spans of 50 for it all.Boss came back from lunch with a Starbucks for me ;)

FOR ANYONE WHO HAS ALREADY READ THIS, PLEASE READ AGAIN. IT HAS BEEN EXPANDED AND A SUMMARY ADDED. THANKS.Women justly complain that they in many, many cases:Do not get equal pay;Do not get equal job opportunities;Are often NOT believed in sexual assault (or even unpleasant “pass” cases)And more.They are correct, and so I support the INTENT of #MeToo. BUT THE #$%&+ SWORD CUTS BOTH WAYS. You ladies would get millions of allies if you included the injustices I shall describe.These primarily originate from the FACT that in Divorce, Child Custody, and related cases our legal system assumes “ALL WOMEN TELL THE TRUTH AND ALL MEN LIE.”. BULLSHITHumans are humans — some honest, some not. I went through this system, eventually had custody and raised my kids after my ex got caught in a few too many lies. Along the way, I served in a Fathers Rights Group. The cases which follow are all REAL, and I can personally testify on them.MEDIA BIAS: To even apply for membership in our Fathers Rights Group you had to be totally paid up on ALL child support and alimony, and have NO charges of any form of violence or abuse made against you. On Father's Day we gathered peacefully in Times Square, NYC to advocate for better enforcement of Child Visitation Court Orders. A group of women assembled across from us and began yelling and throwing things. The Media decided that was more interesting and “more accurate of society” and filmed THEM. The Fathers Day message the TV news carried was that brave women faced down a rally by child molesters.CHILD CUSTODY/VISITATION BUREAUCRACY: A father was advised by his attorney that he had to personally get a petition form from the County Child Support / Custody Visitation bureaucracy before the Judge would hear the case. When he arrived there were two dozen women in line for similar forms. At first, they were very hostile, but when they realized the similarities of cases, they became supportive. Finally the clerk brought out his form. It was filled in on a PRE-PRINTED MASTER on which there were DOZENS of gender-specific pronouns, which to a reader totally inverted his case. He demanded this be corrected. The clerk's supervisor was called and his advice was to get assistance from “that pain in the ass Fathers Rights bunch” and then handed him a business card. It was HIS OWN card. The window then shut for lunch. The ladies — over a dozen of them — took him to lunch. When they all got back, THE WOMEN staged a demonstration in the lobby demanding that his form's pronouns be corrected. They won, and joint planning meetings were held for a while by both Men's and Women's groups. Hey Gals, we are on the same side in this crap — why not unite?GENDER PREJUDICED MOMS: All local Girl Scout and Brownie troops were at capacity. A new Troop was announced at school, but the notice stated that no girl would be admitted unless a parent attended the organization meeting and volunteered for a job among the adult leaders. A Single Father with Custody appeared. He was ordered to leave. Ladies only. He pointed out the notice. “We will make an exception.” “ Not good enough — what will you do when the other girls make cutting remarks? I want to help. I was a Boy Scout leader, so I know kids.”. “But you might peek at the girls when they are dressing.” He replied and the argument went on for about an hour, by which time he had indicated his next step would be an article WITH NAMES in the local paper. They eventually put him in charge of organizing the car pools. That worked for years. But why the gender argument in the first place?COP BEATING TODDLER: Two parents lived several hundred miles apart. Judge ordered Visitation exchanges at a halfway point. Father arrives there to return children at end of Visitation. No one to pick up. Phones; receives only obscene screams. Calls lawyer, who advises him to take children home, put them to bed, and new exchange would be arranged. NEXT DAY WHILE LAWYERS ARE ACTIVELY NEGOTIATING, police raid the man's home on a kidnapping accusation. The entire mess is a setup. As the children are walking to the mother's car, the youngest, a toddler in diapers, turns and runs back to the father. The child hugs his knee, kisses it, and says, “I love you, Daddy.” The child then starts towards the car. The father has done nothing, only said, “I love you, too.” The nearest cop picks up the child, turns the child upside down and begins a very hard spanking while screaming repeatedly, “Never kiss that bad man.”. The thick diaper prevented serious injury, but not the kid's screams. The father goes to report this and is told to drop the complaint or his name, license number, and fact that he “made trouble for a police officer” would be given to every Law Enforcement Officer in the County. But also think of the trauma to one confused toddler…LAW ENFORCEMENT BIAS: One of our members had Custody of his two children. His ex and her boyfriend kidnapped them complete with a ransom phone call. He contacted the FBI. He was informed that if a FEMALE Custodial Parent made such a report, an armed rescue team would be dispatched ASAP as kidnapping is a Federal Crime, BUT if a MALE Custodial Parent made that same call, the FBI treated it as Custodial Interference — a State responsibility — and MIGHT followup in a week or so. The determining factor on this by FBI policy was the gender of the Custodial Parent making the complaint, NOT which one had Court-ordered Custody. Let's hope the FBI has or will change policies…JUDGE IN DIRECT VIOLATION OF FEDERAL LAW: The couple had been married 8 years when she filed for Divorce, 9 years when it came to trial. The father was a Field Grade Commissioned Officer in the Military (Translation: he had lots of rank and looked forward to a good pension). He had not been Deployed during any portion of the marriage (Translation: She was never inconvenienced by his Military Status). Her lawyer demanded that the pension be considered Marital Property and be awarded to the wife. The Judge ordered the father to testify as to its worth. “Your Honor, I do not know.” “ Why not?” “I have over 20 years, so I can retire now or continue to serve. I am under consideration for Promotion. The amount of my pension will depend on my final rank and date of retirement, so I cannot answer your question.”. “By 8 AM tomorrow, you will have on my desk a full accounting of the worth of the pension under each option you have named OR YOU WILL SERVE 6 MONTHS IN JAIL FOR CONTEMPT.” At that point, the father's attorney rose and stated, “The marriage has lasted less than 10 years. Federal Law clearly states that no portion of a Military Pension can be awarded in a Divorce for any marriage under 10 years.” “I do not give a <expletives deleted> for the Federal Law. When I give her his pension it will be by removing that amount from his other assets. Court adjourned until 9 AM tomorrow.”The father called the military Finance and Accounting. A FEMALE Sergeant answered. By this time the man was stuttering. The Sergeant calmed him down and got the details. She then said, “I have a loving stable marriage. But if I were going through a divorce, my military pension would be untouchable. I EARNED MINE; I KEEP MINE. YOU EARNED YOURS; YOU KEEP YOURS! Did that Judge make that threat about an equivalent portion of your assets to reflect your pension in open court?” “Yes.”. “The Judge Advocate will be calling him. And I have selected just which one. As for the accounting statement, an ALL FEMALE VOLUNTEER CREW will insure the FAX IS ON HIS DESK BY 8_AM. They will have to work through the night because of your rank and options, but it will be there.”At 9 AM the next morning the Judge retracted his statements, publicly noting Federal Law and that for even threatening what he had said, he could do jail time.Why can't men and women work together on things like this? The way this Sergeant did!PAUPER'S OATH: The marriage had ended years before, and the ex lived hundreds of miles away in a different state. The father had consistently OVERPAID child support. A few months after his second wife gave birth, he received a Court Summons charging failure to send child support. He showed up, cancelled checks in hand. He was confronted with a Pauper's Oath document claiming his ex could not attend the trial for lack of funds to get there. The Judge ruled that since the document and the ex could not be cross-examined, the document would be considered TRUE and the cancelled checks declared REBUTTAL EVIDENCE and disallowed. He then decreed ALL the man's assets and ALL his income to be sent to the ex to settle claimed missing child support.The man, his wife, and child fled the State with what they could carry over the few days grace period his lawyer could obtain. Eventually his lawyer got a private detective who obtained a statement from the ex-wife's employer as to her status, salary, and how long employed. She had inherited her home and it had no mortgage, She had a rather hefty bank account.The Judge was loath to reopen the case because the man had fled. When it became imminent that the case would make the local newspaper, a rather odd resolution was decreed. The ex-wife was sentenced in absentia to a 6 month PRISON sentence for the perjury of the Pauper document. The father was sentenced to a rather hefty child support payment, BUT COULD DELAY PAYMENT UNTIL SHE SERVED HER SENTENCE. His debt would be cancelled if she did not serve her sentence before the youngest child came of age. The Warrant for Perjury stayed open for close to a decade. Nobody involved returned to that state.CHILD ABUSE, PHYSICAL, FEMALE: Then there was a mother who bribed someone to severely beat her young son in hopes that it would enrage the father to hit her. Instead, he yelled at her, gave first aid, and lay down on his bed. She called 911. Cop arrived WITH DRAWN GUN. Father offered full cooperation including being cuffed, but with a condition. Listen to the young child. The Officer did so despite the age of the child. Then, an outraged policeman confronted the mother. After that the local police bulletin board listed that address and phone with the admonition, “Arrest the woman FIRST.”Are all women like this bunch? HELL NO! I am happily married to a lady who has had difficulty even visualizing these cases. But they do exist. A large portion of unpaid Child Support is the result of cases like these that were not resolved. I could cite more examples.When the #MeToo movement advocates society's abandonment of gender stereotypes and true gender equality, RATHER THAN simply empowerment and justice for females, it will obtain the support of men who have been abused in Divorce Courts and elsewhere.I SAID I SUPPORT THEIR INTENT, BUT NOT THEIR TACTICS.