Tax: Fill & Download for Free

It got into the Brexit mess by joining the EU. (Technically of course, it joined the antecedent of the EU, the EEC, which became the EU via the Maastricht Treaty).It should never have joined.To understand the original foundations of the EU, I recommend reading The Great Deception by Christopher Booker and Richard North. Its authors say, after completing their research in the early 2000s, it had become clear to them that Britain would leave the EU, the only question being when.The timing is significant. By this time, they were able to uncover secret official documents under the 30 year rule. One can read more about that here: 2017 – 012 Lord Kilmuir’s letter to Heath 1972Most significant was the paper FCO 30/1048. It was an official paper that argued joining the EU involved widespread surrender of sovereignty. Knowing this was a hot button issue for the electorate, Prime Minister Edward Heath said:There is no question of Britain losing essential national sovereignty… The British safeguards of habeus corpus and trial by jury will remain intact. So will the principle that a man is innocent until he has been proved guilty.But FCO 30/1048 had argued the EU would involve fiscal and monetary union within 30 years. It was wrong only in the timing. And wrong in its assumption that the Union would be insane enough attempt one without the other. These events show the government knew how important it was to suppress this official paper, and conceal the loss of sovereignty from the public.David Blake writes in Briefings For Brexit:In the last few State of the Union addresses, Jean-Claude Juncker has made it clear that the Commission wants political union by 2025. By which he means a single presidency (i.e., removing the competing Council and Commission presidencies, with a clear preference that Europe’s “President” will be the Commission president), a single foreign policy, a single fiscal and tax policy, and a single military command, etc. This is all allowed by the 2007 Lisbon Treaty which introduced a European constitution by the backdoor – after it was rejected in national referenda in 2005.[1][1][1][1]This is, and always was, the EU’s direction of travel. From Britain’s point of view, the EU is only going to get worse, not better. Perhaps this would be forgivable if there were evidence that the UK had secured clear economic benefit from EU membership, but there is none and plenty to suggest the opposite.[2][2][2][2] [3][3][3][3] [4][4][4][4]Britain’s accession to the EU was a fundamental constitutional change, enacted amid deliberate concealment of its consequences. Britain got into this Brexit mess in 1973, by means of an officially sponsored coup.Footnotes[1] The Withdrawal Agreement is a one-way ticket back into the EU[1] The Withdrawal Agreement is a one-way ticket back into the EU[1] The Withdrawal Agreement is a one-way ticket back into the EU[1] The Withdrawal Agreement is a one-way ticket back into the EU[2] Barney Lane's answer to Do educated people like Boris Johnson and Jacob Rees-Mogg really believe that the UK can do economically better by leaving of one of the biggest single markets in the world?[2] Barney Lane's answer to Do educated people like Boris Johnson and Jacob Rees-Mogg really believe that the UK can do economically better by leaving of one of the biggest single markets in the world?[2] Barney Lane's answer to Do educated people like Boris Johnson and Jacob Rees-Mogg really believe that the UK can do economically better by leaving of one of the biggest single markets in the world?[2] Barney Lane's answer to Do educated people like Boris Johnson and Jacob Rees-Mogg really believe that the UK can do economically better by leaving of one of the biggest single markets in the world?[3] https://www.civitas.org.uk/content/files/mythandparadox.pdf[3] https://www.civitas.org.uk/content/files/mythandparadox.pdf[3] https://www.civitas.org.uk/content/files/mythandparadox.pdf[3] https://www.civitas.org.uk/content/files/mythandparadox.pdf[4] The EU single market in services barely exists, and has been slowly disappearing since 2010 | BrexitCentral[4] The EU single market in services barely exists, and has been slowly disappearing since 2010 | BrexitCentral[4] The EU single market in services barely exists, and has been slowly disappearing since 2010 | BrexitCentral[4] The EU single market in services barely exists, and has been slowly disappearing since 2010 | BrexitCentral

Iqta was an Islamic practice of tax farming. Now tax farming implies to the responsibility of collecting of taxes by groups(Read Third Parties). It became common in the Buyid dynasty in Muslim Asia. The Buyid Dynasty was active from 934 to 1048 AD. A point to note here is that the word farming here does not have anything to do with agriculture other than metaphorically. The word farmer is also not related to agriculture, it relates to the person who pays the taxes.The above given image may give you a fair idea about the system in general.More about the Iqta system can be read about in Orientalist Claude Cahen’s Work Encyclopedia Of Islam.EDIT- Its my first answer on Quora.

Looking at absolute numbers is misleading. You must look at relative change, because the economies under each president is different. If you do this, you’ll note the following:Obama: +68%GW Bush: +101%Clinton: +32%GH Bush: + 54%Reagan: +186%Carter: +43%Ford: +47%Nixon: +34%… (moderate debt increases)Roosevelt: +1048%!!!!Note that Obama’s performance, while bad, isn’t the worst. Three Presidents did much worse. Obama’s debt increase is largely due to the stimulus package they formulated in an effort to stem a worse recession than was had in 2008 combined with tax cuts and increased military spending. Revenues dropped and the stimulus was a rise in expenses; it simply had to result in larger debt growth than average.