Affidavit To Dispense With The Filing Of A Bond: Fill & Download for Free

To put it simply Electoral Bonds (EB) issue policy is fraud on Indian democracy and perpetrated to amass all the quid pro quo moneys or bribes either before deals or after the deals like what might have happened in Rafale Deal. The most opaque way of running a party and using the moneys to buy MLAs (e.g. Goa, KA or even Haryana) or MPs to buy the state Govts or even could have been used to silence the opposition leaders in addition to threatening using Govt agencies like IT, ED or CBI.Electoral Bonds policy before become law was objected by RBI and in fact it was mentioned in one of their communications as a tool for ‘Money Laundering’ and Election Commission is objecting every time the issue is opened up for subscription. Thanks to Nitin Sethi from Huffington Post, the whole perpetrated fraud is exposed now through information from RTI and all the opposition parties failed to analyse properly when the bill was presented and now crying wolf.Modi & Co made huge money (>Rs.6000 Crs) since 2017–18 obviously would like to defend using CA Piyush Goyal (another liar as if he doesn’t understand the scheming involved in EB) but failing miserably and irony is Supreme Court didn’t take the plea against EB issue so far though all elections since 2017–18 to current 2019 state elections including 2019 Parliament elections were manipulated using these moneys from various corporate or HNI in a way helping black money hoarders to convert into white and this scheming is next only to biggest scam of DeMo solely brought by Modi.Image courtesy: GoogleThere are few points worth mentioning after RTI disclosure now with link below from Huffington Post:Govt claiming secrecy is a lie/farce and its traceable by ruling dispensation in addition to SBI and tracking of alpha numeric number can be traced right from origin of buying to encashing the bonds by entities;RBI objected even before policy was introduced in Parliament as EB can be used as possible tool for money laundering;EC has objected right from beginning as opaque way of funding an election as nobody knows who is funding (routing through several hands possible) and lacks the transparency required;PMO intervened to sell bonds beyond published periods especially before State elections in Mar’18 and Nov’18 and even extended in Apr-May’19 which is not legal as per law;Govt asked SBI to accept even expired bonds for en-cashment and thats beyond the remit of the law;Modi PMO Ordered Illegal Electoral Bond Sale Before Vital State PollsElectoral Bonds Are Traceable: Documents Nail Govt Lie On Donor AnonymityGovt Made SBI Accept Expired Electoral Bonds Sold In Illegal WindowTo summarise, there is no doubt BJP is exercising fraud against people of this country using EB schemes that are not prevalent in any country with such opaqueness and its blatant corruption in kind.The top 10 controversial issues about EB so far from RTI disclosure sought by HuffingtonPost, Indian express, etc are listed below provided byhttps://www.thenewsminute.com/article/electoral-bonds-controversy-all-you-need-know-10-points-112763The report by Huffington Post stated that the government ignored the objections raised by RBI, and only after the Bill was passed did the government figure out how the bonds would work.The report added that when questioned in Parliament in 2017 if the Election Commission raised concerns about electoral bonds, then MoS P Radhakrishnan lied on the floor of the House that it hadn’t when it in fact had. The EC had reportedly written to the Law Ministry, who sent the concerns to the Finance Ministry — who never took cognisance of it.In 2019, finance minister Nirmala Sitaraman tabled a ‘corrected reply’ the 2017 question, which acknowledged that the EC had raised concerns. Nirmala’s response was tabled after the EC’s objections became public knowledge due to an affidavit that it filed in the Supreme Court in March 2019.Furthermore, the concerns of opposition parties were also ignored.Five state Assembly elections were scheduled in 2018. According to the HuffPost article, the prime minister’s office asked for the rules laid down for electoral bonds to be broken — and had special windows apart from the stipulated 10-day window where bonds were issued. The bonds had been opened for in March 2018, April 2018 (when it was actually supposed to be opened) and once again in May 2018, before the Karnataka elections.94.5% of the bonds received during this period went to the BJP. The opening of extra windows to sell bonds is crucial because a time limit was imposed in order to curtail money laundering.After the Karnataka election threw up a hung Assembly, the report states that the Prime Minister’s office forced the banks to accept expired electoral bonds — which had been bought during the special window opened prior to the elections.The expired bonds, which SBI initially refused to accept as they were cashed beyond the 15-day period. The bank wrote to the finance ministry — to see if the period is 15 working days or 15 calendar days. The ministry wrote back that it was 15 calendar days.Technically, the bonds had lapsed and couldn’t go to the political party, and should have been given to the National Disaster Relief Fund.However, an official from the finance ministry directed that the bonds could be accepted within 15 working days due to the confusion this time alone.Electoral bonds are supposed to be untraceable. However, a 2018 investigation by The Quint found that they actually carry an alphanumeric code which can be seen under a UV light. At the time, the Finance Ministry issued a press release, stating that security features had been built in to eliminate chances of forgery or presentation of fake bonds, but is not noted in any record by the bank and can’t be used to track a donation. According to HuffPost, however, citing an RTI filed by Commodore Lokesh Batra (Retd), said — “SBI does use the alphanumeric code to keep track of who bought how many bonds, and the political party to whom the bond was eventually donated.The rules also state that if required, this data can be shared with law enforcement agencies. This, in turn, means that there is a clear map of the route a bond takes — but only the general populace and opposition parties aren’t aware of it.According to the Indian Express, RTI documents that Lokesh Batra received showed that bonds of Rs 1 crore and Rs 10 lakh were nearly 99.7% of the total bonds sold in between March 1, 2018, and July 24, 2019. Of this, bonds of Rs 1 crore accounted for 91%.On Thursday, the Congress and some other opposition parties staged a walkout from the Lok Sabha, calling electoral bonds a "big scam" and said it wasn’t transparent.The matter was raised by the Congress soon after the House assembled for the day with its leader Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury announcing that his party has moved an adjournment motion over the issue.The BJP on Thursday held a press conference to explain its stand and said that it is only natural that the Congress opposed a system which is cleaning the electoral process of black money. “The allegations against the government over electoral bonds are baseless. The Modi government has, in fact, for the first time, taken a number of steps against corruption," Union Railways Minister Piyush Goyal said. He further added that cash had been removed from the electoral process.On Friday morning, the Congress protested at Gandhi Statue and demanded that the Prime Minister should break his silence on the issue. "Speak up Prime Minister," shouted Congress MPs who gathered near the Mahatma Gandhi statue in Parliament with placards reading "Rs 6,000 crore robbery".

You can seek early trial citing the same reason andvery importantly one can seek the dispensation of attendance depending upon the case. i.e. you need not to attend every hearing and lawyer woud take care of it. But this would not exempt someone from not attending permanently, whenever summons or lawyer is directed to present before the court on so and so day and one must be present, otherwise an adverse impression would be made to the court.Further Write in affidavit and seek the permission court to fast process the case and you would stay till then say for one month.Further you can put a case in the supreme court where both the accused and informant could go and appear before court for hearings or witness would come and court may put condition to give allowance for victim to come and appear before that court and such provision is there itself in the constitution itself.Otherwise sometimes as an example AM saying, one resides in Delhi and another Jaiselmar and the case is filed at jaiselmar, then one can seek rajasthan high court itself to transfer the case to jaipur.But it depends whether court could give such relief or not. Usually courts are liberal as the justice would serve both.Conditions may include the bail bond, number of sureties, other bank guarantees etc depending on the nature of the case.Further reason behind the presence of accused to be mandatory is that whatever the trial happens, it must be in the presence of accused where accused can rebut it properly.